Sep 12, 2022 Plan Commission

[Plan Commission Pre Meeting]

[00:00:09]

GOOD EVENING. WELCOME TO THE SEPTEMBER 12TH MEETING OF THE GARLAND PLAN COMMISSION. THIS FIRST PORTION OF OUR MEETING IS OUR WORK SESSION PORTION WHERE STAFF WILL BRIEF US AND ALL THE CASES. AFTER THAT, WE WILL TAKE A RECESS AND COME BACK AT SEVEN O'CLOCK FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF OUR MEETING. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING . FIRST I'D LIKE TO GO OVER THE CONSENT AGENDA. THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS AND THE CONSENT AGENDA. I SEE NONE. YES COMMISSIONER JENKINS. YOUR LIVE. YEAH THANK YOU. I'M SORRY. I DO HAVE A QUESTION REGARDING IT LOOKS LIKE, UM P 20 TO 25 HAS ANY. WAS THERE ANY REASON THAT THE APPLICANT WITH TRULY APPLICATION. YES SIR, IS NOT DUE TO A TECHNICAL TECHNICAL ISSUE OR ANYTHING INVOLVING THE CITY WAS A CIVIL MATTER OF WHY THEY WANT IT WITHDRAWN AT THIS TIME.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. GOOD QUESTION. OKAY NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA. I BELIEVE THE 20 TO 26.

AND THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT 37 TOWN HOUSES AND OPEN SPACE. HERE'S THE CASE INFORMATION. THE ACREAGE IS 3.183 ACRES AND EXISTING ZONING IS PLAN DEVELOPMENT 85 52.

HERE'S THE LOCATION MAP AND THE RED STAR SHOWS THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND THIS IS THE LOCATION MAP THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES OUTLINED IN THE TEAL BLUE COLOR. IT IS OWN PD 85 52. AND, UM, THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH OR HIS OWN FOR PD, 0 6-12 AND PD 83, 54 RETAIL AND SINGLE FAMILY USES THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST IS DEVELOPED FOR THE FIRE STATION. AND THEN TO THE SOUTH ARE ALL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND TO THE WEST ACROSS COUNTRY SOUTH COUNTRY CLUB, HIS OWN COMMUNITY RETAIL WITH RETAIL USE. THE FUTURE LANDES MAP OF THE ENVISION GARLAND PLANT AS IGNATZ, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS COMPACT NEIGHBORHOOD. IN THIS PROPOSED USE IS COMPATIBLE TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. HERE ARE SOME OF THE SITE PHOTOS. THE TOP LEFT IS VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SOUTH COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. THE TOP RIGHT IS THE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM MILLER ROAD. BOTTOM LEFT IS EAST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND BOTTOM RIGHT IS SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND HERE IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN, WHICH SHOWS A TOTAL OF 37 SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED TO LOTS, THEIR THEIR TOWN HOUSES AND TWO H O A LOTS AND THE ACCESS WILL BE FROM ONE ACCESS FROM MILLER ROAD, AND THE OTHER ONE WILL BE FROM SOUTH COUNTRY CLUB. AND IT DOESN'T MEET THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND THE GUEST PARKING REQUIREMENT PER THE G D. C. THEY ARE PROPOSING AMENITY, WHICH INCLUDES A PLAYGROUND AREA, AND THERE ARE SOME GAZEBO HERE WITH BENCHES. AND THERE ARE SOME LOT , UM, DEVIATIONS THAT THEY ARE REQUESTING AND I'LL GO OVER THAT IN JUST A MOMENT. AND HERE'S THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT DOES COMPLY WITH THE SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING STANDARDS FOR THE G. D. C. ALONG EAST MILLER ROAD AND SOUTH COUNTRY CLUB. THE AFRICAN IS PROPOSING ORNAMENTAL FENCE WITH THE MASONRY COLUMNS AND APPROPRIATE VEGETATION TO FULLY SCREEN THE DEVELOPMENT. FROM THE STREET. ALONG THE EASTERN AND SOUTHERN PERIMETER LINE. THEY ARE PROPOSING A, UM MASONRY WALL. AND HERE ARE THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS. AND IT DOES COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS. HERE ARE SOME THREE D RENDERINGS. AND HERE ARE THE DEVIATIONS. THE FIRST ONE IS FOR THE LOT AREA. THE MINIMUM REQUIRED PER THE GDC IS 2000 SQUARE FEET. AND PROPOSES 1740. THE MINIMUM BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE IS BEING DECREASED TO ALLOW FOR THE PRODUCT THAT THE BUILDER WOULD LIKE TO PUT IN, WHICH WILL BE A HIGHER QUALITY PRODUCT FOR THE END USER FOR THE APPLICANT. THE SECOND DEVIATION IS ON THE LOT DEPTH. THE REQUIRED IS 90 FT AND PROPOSES 70 FT. THE MINIMUM DEPTH HAS BEEN REDUCED FROM 90 TO 70 FT DUE TO THE SITE CONSTRAINTS THAT WOULD NOT ALLOW FOR MUCH OF THE

[00:05:04]

AND THE ADDITIONAL FIVE FT HAVE BEEN USED TOWARDS THE LOSS AND THE DEVIATION ALLOWED ALLOWS THE DEVELOPER TO MAINTAIN THE CONSISTENCY AND THE PRODUCT. NEXT DEVIATION IS THE GARAGE.

THE GDC REQUIRES AN OFFSET FRONT ENTRY WITH THE GARAGE DOOR. STEP BACK AT LEAST FIVE FT BEHIND THE FRONT BUILDING FACE. AND THEY ARE PROVIDING THE MINIMUM 20 FT DRIVEWAY DEPTH, HOWEVER, THE MINIMUM OFFSET OF FIVE FT IS NOT PROVIDED AND THE OFFSITE THE OFFSET IS NOT PROVIDED DUE TO THE DESIRED ARCHITECTURAL STYLE. THE PROPOSED TOWN HOMES AND THE LAST DEVIATION IS REGARDING ALLEYS AND ALLIES ARE REQUIRED. THEY ARE NOT PROPOSING ANY ALLEYS AT THIS TIME, AND THE SIZE OF THE SITE MAKES IT DIFFICULT TO ACCOMMODATE ALI FRONTAGE. THE GARAGES AND DRIVEWAYS WILL BE IN THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING AND WILL BE SERVICED BY THE STREET. THE APPLICANT IS CONSTRUCTING. THE GARAGE LOCATION MEETS ALL THE CITY SPACING AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE CHANGE IN ZONING FROM PD 85 52 FOR MIXED USES TO PD FOR SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED, USES AND APPROVAL OF THE DETAILED PLAN FOR A SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED USES. AND I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ALSO HAVE NOTIFICATIONS. THERE WERE 100 AND ONE LETTER SENT OUT TO WHERE WITHIN A NOTIFICATION AREA AGAINST THE REQUEST. ONE WAS OUTSIDE OF THE NOTIFICATION AREA FOR THE REQUEST TO OUTSIDE OF THE NOTIFICATION AREA AGAINST THE REQUEST, AND WE RECEIVED A TOTAL OF FIVE RESPONSES. ALREADY ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS, COMMISSIONER OBEN THANK YOU, MR CHAIR. UM ON THE GARAGE. OFFSET IS SO ARE THE IS THE GARAGE IN THE FRONT? IS IT EVEN? OR IS THE GARAGE IN FRONT OF THERE'S NO. FIVE FT OFFSET BUT IT DIDN'T SAY IS WHERE IS THE GARAGE RELATIVE TO THE TO THE BUILDING LINE, SO IT WOULDN'T BE 25 FT WOULD JUST BE 20 FT. RIGHT BUT THERE'S A MAYBE I MISUNDERSTOOD IF YOU COULD GO BACK TO THAT SLIDE. NOT THAT SIDE. THE SIDE THAT DETAILS OF ARIANS, PLEASE. THE VARIANCE. RIGHT WITH THE GARAGE. SO THE GARAGE I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT THE DRIVEWAY DEPTH TALKING ABOUT THE OFFSET. THE GDC REQUIRES AN OFFSET OF FRONT ENTRY WITH THE GARAGE SET BACK FIVE FREE FEET BEHIND THE BUILDING FACE. THIS SAYS THERE IS NO OFFSET BUT IT DOESN'T INDICATE WHERE. DOES THAT MEAN THE GARAGE IS 10 FT.

IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING PHASE OR IT'S FLUSHED. FLUSHED WITH THE BUILDING FACE, OKAY? THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. I'VE GOT A COMMISSIONER JENKINS GO AHEAD. ER MEANS COME RIGHT OUT.

NO, YOUR FIRST I YOU KNOW, FOLLOW UP AT THE END THERE, YOU KNOW ME FEW FEW NUGGETS OF WISDOM. MY QUESTION IS REALLY GONNA CENTER AROUND THE ALLEYS AND MY QUESTIONS AROUND THE ALLEYS AND AROUND DRAINAGE. WE KNOW ENGINEERING HAD A CHANCE TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT. WE'VE GOT A PRETTY STRONG FEELING THAT THAT THAT THERE IS GOING TO BE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE ON THE PROPERTY. AND THAT THIS IS THE WAY THAT IT'S SOCIETY WON'T AFFECT THE SURROUNDING SORT OF AREAS. I KNOW THAT THE. THE ROAD OF HOUSES CLOSE TO THE NEIGHBORS . AT THE END, THEY'RE GOING TO BE KIND OF CLOTHES, SO I JUST WANT AGAIN CONFIRMATION THAT THERE WILL BE NO IMPACT TO THOSE OTHER AREAS BECAUSE OF THE DRAINAGE. THAT IS CORRECT. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, UM, LOOKED AT THE ALL THE CRITERIAS ARE REQUIRED TO QUALIFY FOR AN ALLEY WAIVER, AND THEY MEET ALL THOSE REQUIREMENTS. UM SO THEY'RE FINE. UM AGAIN, A COUPLE OF THINGS. THIS SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE UPDATED. BECAUSE IT ISN'T TECHNICALLY CORRECT NOW AND EVEN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS GIVEN THE FALSE IMPRESSION THAT THERE'S MORE LANDSCAPING BECAUSE THEY'RE SHOWING SINGLE WIDTH DRIVEWAYS. THAT'S WHY I HAD ASKED YOU ARE THEY TANDEM TANDEM GARAGE IN DOUBLE WIDE GARAGE? AND APPARENTLY IT IS. OF COURSE , I'D LIKE TO KNOW WHAT A SPLIT GARAGE STORIES BUT THOSE ARE ACTUALLY UH, 16 FT WIDE DRIVEWAYS, NOT EIGHT FOOTAGE SHOWING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANTS THAT NEEDS TO BE PICKED UP. AND UH, SOME OF THE SIDEWALKS AREN'T SHOWN TO THE FRONT DOORS EITHER,

[00:10:03]

OKAY WITH THAT I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THEY WOULD HAVE MADE HIM AND THEY LIKE HIM, BUT I THOUGHT THEY WOULD HAVE MADE HIM PUSH IT ALL THE WAY TO THE EDGE OF THE PROPERTY VIRTUALLY AND THEN VEERED IN WHICH WOULD HAVE KILLED A BUILDING. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT IT DOES.

TRANSPORTATION HAS SIGNED OFF AND THEY ARE OKAY WITH THAT DRIVEWAY. ALRIGHT? UH ON THE END UNITS, LOTS ONLY BEING 25 INSTEAD OF 30 THAT PUTS ASIDE OF THE BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY LINE. AND THE PICTURE SHOW WINDOWS. HOW THE SIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE AND ACCORDING TO THE BUILDING CODE, THOSE WALLS HAVE TO BE ONE HOUR. THERE'S ONLY A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF WINDOWS THAT ARE LOUD AND WINDOWS HAVE TO BE RATED ALSO, SO THEY MAY WANT TO THINK TWICE ABOUT THAT.

OR THEY MAY HAVE TO ELIMINATE THE WINDOWS FROM THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING. SO THERE'S ANOTHER.

KIND OF BLEND OF ISSUES BETWEEN BUILDING CODES AND ZONING. AND THAT'S ALL I GOT. YES, COMMISSIONER JENKINS. YOU MADE A FANTASTIC POINT REGARDING TRAFFIC IN THE DISTANCE THAT THAT PORTION ON EAST MILLER IS ONE WAY TRAFFIC ALL CONCERNED THAT IT'S GOING TO CAUSE CONGESTION HAS CARS WERE TRYING TO MAKE A U TURN AT THE LIGHT OR HAVE TO GO ALL THE WAY DOWN TO MAKE A U TURN TO GET AROUND. THEY HAVE REVIEWED ALL OF THAT, AND THEY LOOKED AT ALL THE CALCULATIONS AND I BELIEVE THEY ARE FINE WITH WITH THE CITY OR THE PERHAPS IN COLLABORATION WITH THE DEVELOPER, CONSIDER ALLOWING SOME SORT OF CUT IN AT THAT, UM, AT THE AT THE DIVISION THERE THAT'S IN THE ROAD. WE HAVE TO TALK TO THE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT REGARDING THAT, BUT, UM I DON'T THINK IT LOOKS LIKE A LEFT HAND TURN LANE THERE AND THEY PROBABLY WOULDN'T ALLOW A CUT. WHEN MIGHT BE NICE IS MAYBE DIESEL LANE? A LITTLE LONG. IT'S NOT EVEN LONG ENOUGH FOR DECELERATION LEE AND INTO THE PROJECT, SO IT KIND OF STUCK OKAY. THANK YOU. ALREADY. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE 20 TO 20. IT IS ALSO ANOTHER TOWN HOME PROJECT, THE APPLICANT REQUEST TO ALLOW 93 TOWN HOUSES ON THE EASTERN TRACK AND 63 TOWN HOUSES ON THE WESTERN TRACKED AND OPEN SPACES. HERE'S THE CASE INFORMATION. UM THE SUBJECT.

OVERALL SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 21 ACRES, BUT THE EASTERN TRUCK IS 13 ACRES. WESTERN TRACKED EIGHT ACRES. AND THE ZONING IS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 85 50 AND COMMUNITY OFFICE. HERE'S THE CITY BY LOCATION MAP AND THE RED STAR SHOWS THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. HERE IS THE LOCATION MAP AND BOTH THE PROPERTIES ARE OUTLINED IN THE TEAL BLUE COLOR. UM THE EASTERN TRACKED HIS OWN 85 50, WHICH WAS FOR RETAIL USE AND IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED AND THE WESTERN TRACT IS OWNED. COMMUNITY OFFICE , AND THERE WAS ALSO A SPECIFIC USE PROVISIONS APPROVED BACK IN 2006 FOR RETAIL PERSONAL SERVICE USES, WHICH I WAS NEVER CONSTRUCTED. SO IT IS AN IMPROVED OF THIS TIME. AND THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH ACROSS CAMPBELL OR HIS OWN PD 97 04 PD 15 35 PD 16 46. THERE IS CURRENTLY A BANK MEDICAL FACILITY AND APARTMENT COMPLEX AND AN AUTO REPAIR USE. AND PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH. UM A D 85 50. THERE IS AN APARTMENT COMPLEX AND THEN OVER HERE TO THE WEST, THERE IS A CITY PARK HERE. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE ENVISIONED. GARLAND PLANT DESIGNATES THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS COMPACT NEIGHBORHOODS AND URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS. AND HE PROPOSED USE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. HERE ARE SOME OF THE SITE PHOTOS. THE TOP LEFT IS, UM, VIEW OF THE WESTERN TRACK FROM WITH CAMPBELL ROAD.

THE TOP RIGHT IS VIEW OF THE EASTERN TRACK FROM WEST CAMPBELL. THE BOTTOM LEFT IS NORTH OF THE WESTERN TRACKED AND BOTTOM RIGHT IS NORTH OF THE EASTERN TRACK. AND HERE IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN, WHICH SHOWS A TOTAL OF 156 TOWN HOMES AND 18 H O A LOTS TRACKED. ONE IS THE

[00:15:04]

BUT ON THE WESTERN TRACKED, UM THEY ARE PROVIDING THE LARGE CANOPY TREES AND EVERYWHERE THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT. HERE ARE THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS. IT DOES COMPLY WITH THE ARTICULATION. BUT THERE ARE SOME , UM, ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS THAT THEY'RE REQUESTING DEVIATION ON AND I'LL JUST GO OVER IN A MOMENT. THE CLUBHOUSE ELEVATION. EITHER JUST RENDERINGS. AND HERE'S THE DEVIATION TABLE. THE FIRST ONE IS REGARDING A LOT AREA, AND THE REQUIRED IS 2000 SQUARE FEET AND MINIMUM THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING A 1600 SQUARE FEET. PROPOSED LOT SIZE ALLOWS THE DESIRED NUMBER OF TOWN HOMES AND ENHANCED AMENITIES. AND THE PROPOSED THE SECOND DEVIATION IS REGARDING A LOT DEPTH. MINIMUM IS 90 FT REQUIRED, AND THEY'RE PROPOSING 75 FT. AND THIS IS BECAUSE THE LOT WITH IS DUE TO THE UNUSUAL SHAPE OF THE WESTERN TRACKED AND THE FLOODPLAIN ON THE EASTERN TRACK WOULD TAKES UP 2.11 ACRES. AND ALSO REQUESTING DEVIATION ON THE LOT WITH THE MINIMUM IS 30 FT. AND THEY'RE PROVIDING 27 FT. THEY'RE COMPLYING WITH THE INTERIOR LOTS. THE NEXT ONE IS REGARDING LAW ORIENTATION. ALL THE LOTS WITHIN SF A DISTRICT MISS FRONT ON A PUBLIC STREET CITY APPROVED PUBLIC WEIGH OR COMMON LAW AREA THAT IS DEDICATED FOR MUTUAL ACCESS TO EACH LOT, AND THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 81 MUSE TYPE LOTS WHERE THEY DON'T FRONT UNTIL PUBLIC STREET OR CITY APPROVED PUBLIC WEIGH, BUT THEY DO HAVE IN EVERY INSTANCE A COMMON AREA LOT THAT IS DEDICATED FOR MUTUAL ACCESS TO THESE TOWN HOMES. THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT THEY HAVE BUILT MANY MUSE TYPE LOTS FOR OTHER PROJECTS, WHICH INCLUDES HERITAGE PARK AND RIVER SET IN GARLAND. AND THEY HAVE FOUND THE UNIQUE LIVING ENVIRONMENT IS SOMETHING HIGHLY DESIRED BY THEIR HOMEOWNERS TO THE POINT THAT THEY ARE WILLING TO PAY A PREMIUM PRICE FOR SUCH A TOWN HOME FRONTING INTO AMUSED CONDITION. NEXT IS ALI'S AND GDC REQUIRES ALI. AND THE APP CAN PROPOSES 35 FRONT LOADED LOTS AND 121 REAR LOADED LOTS AND THEY'RE JUST PROVIDING A COMBINATION OF FRONT AND REAR LOADED LOTS. NEXT DEVIATION IS GARAGE SET BACK 20. FT IS REQUIRED. AND THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE 20 FT DRIVEWAY

[00:20:06]

AND THE APPLICANT FEEL THE NEED TO CREATE A PT SPECIFIC TO THE SITE LOCATION AND ALLOWING FOR A MUCH MORE CREATIVE AND UNIQUE URBAN STYLE CONTEMPORARY TOWN HOME PRODUCT. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE CHANGE IN ZONING FROM 85 50 AND COMMUNITY OFFICE DISTRICT. TO A P D DISTRICT FOR SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED USES. ALLIE WAIVER AND APPROVAL OF THE DETAILED PLAN. AND WE SENT OUT 109 NOTIFICATION LETTERS. RECEIVE FIVE WITHIN A NOTIFICATION AREA AGAINST THE REQUEST. ONE OUTSIDE OF THE NOTIFICATION AREA FOR THE REQUEST. 50 OUTSIDE OF THE NOTIFICATION AREA AGAINST THE REQUEST AND RECEIVED A TOTAL OF 56 RESPONSES. BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONER DALTON AND COMMISSIONER ROSE. THE SEVERAL OF THE RESPONSES THAT CAME BACK FROM CITIZENS. DISCUSSED OR STATED. THEY DIDN'T WANT THE PARK TO BE TAKEN AWAY.

IS THERE A CITY PARK? ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY. YES IT WILL REMAIN A CITY PARK AND ONE THING I FORGOT TO MENTION IS THEY ARE PROPOSING A TRAIL FROM THIS DEVELOPMENT, WHICH WILL CONNECT TO THE CITY TRAIL. OKAY? DID YOU SAY THERE'S ALSO OPEN SPACE? OR JUST THE CITY PARK ON THE WEST.

THE CITY PARK TO THE WEST. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER ROSE THAT WAS PART OF MY QUESTION AS WELL. THERE'S A BEAUTIFUL FOUNTAIN AND OPEN LAND THERE. HOW ARE CITIZENS GOING TO GET TO THAT IF THEY WANT TO NUMBER ONE NUMBER TWO IF THEY'RE THERE ON THE LAND AND ABSORBING THE SUN IN THE FOUNTAIN AND ALSO FOURTH WHAT IS GOING TO PREVENT THEM FROM WALKING INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT ON THE WESTERN SIDE? AND NUMBER THREE. THERE'S NO THERE'S NOT ANY PARKING FOR CITIZENS TO GET TO THAT PARKLAND WITH THE FOUNTAIN AND SO FORTH. CAN WE REQUIRE THIS DEVELOPER TO PUT A NICE WOODEN FENCE OR SOMETHING BEAUTIFUL LOOKING FENCE SO THEY CAN GET FROM THE OPEN AREA. THAT'S ON THE WEST SIDE OF THAT FOUNTAIN POND AREA OVER TO THE EASTERN SIDE. UM, MAKES SENSE TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND THE SITE PLAN. THERE YOU GO. I MAYBE ABLE TO HELP IN A COUPLE OF THOSE. I THINK THERE'S GOING TO BE ABOUT A FOUR FT RETAINING WALL.

BETWEEN ALONG THE BACKSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHT AND FENCING ON TOP OF THAT, YEAH.

OKAY? I DIDN'T DO THAT. BUT STILL HOW OUR CITIZENS GOING TO GET OVER TO THAT. CITY PARKLAND AND FOUNTAIN AREA. I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT MIGHT HAVE SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. UM WHAT'S THAT SQUIGGLY LINE DOWN THERE AT THE BOTTOM? I NEVER COULD FIGURE THAT OUT TRAIL. OH, THAT'S THE TRAIL. THAT'S YEAH, BUT THERE'S NO PLACE FOR CITIZENS TO PARK THERE BECAUSE THAT'S ALL PRIVATE PROPERTY. THERE'S ALREADY ACCESS TO THAT TRAIL. IT'S ON THE IT'S ON THE EAST SIDE OF SHILOH. NOW THEN YOU'D HAVE TO GO UNDER SHILOH TO GET TO IT. IT HAS A TRAIL THAT GOES UNDERNEATH SHILOH. THEY'VE NEVER HAD PARKING ON THAT SIDE. THERE'S NOT ANY PARKING ON THE FAR WEST SIDE OF THAT POND. THERE NEVER HAS BEEN. THAT'S ALWAYS BEEN CAMELOT HAS ALWAYS WANTED TO HAVE. UM HAS ALWAYS WANTED TO HAVE SOME SORT OF ACCESS THERE, AND THEY NEVER HAVE NEVER HAVE ALRIGHT, IT'S STILL SOMETHING. THAT'S A CONCERN OF MINE THAT THAT'S GOING TO BE REALLY SECLUDING THAT FOUNTAIN AREA THOSE PEOPLE IN THE THREE STORY HOUSES ALONG YOU'RE GOING TO LOVE IT BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE BEAUTIFUL. BUT ANYWAY, THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER RIGHT HERE. WELL MY QUESTION IS PRETTY SIMPLE. THE ON TRACK ONE YOU CAN SEE THERE'S A NICE ROAD

[00:25:05]

THE NEXT ITEM IS E 20 TO 43. THE APPLICANT REQUEST TO ADD THREE UM SHADED STRUCTURES AND THREE PREFABRICATED BUILDINGS TO SUPPORT THE EXISTING RECYCLING SALVAGE YARD. HERE'S THE CASE INFORMATION. AND THE ZONING IS P D 1932. HERE'S THE CITY BY LOCATION MAP AND THE RED STAR SHOWS THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND THIS IS THE LOCATION MAP THIS SUBJECT PROPERTIES OUTLINED IN THIS TALE BLUE COLOR. CURRENT ZONING IS PD 1932 AND BACK IN 2019. THERE WAS ANOTHER LAYOUT THAT WAS APPROVED FOR THIS, UM. EXISTING RECYCLING SALVAGE YARD AND SINCE THEN THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO AMEND, UM THIS LAYOUT. AND THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE ALL MAINLY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH ZONE COMMUNITY OFFICE, AND THERE'S MEDICAL RELATED USES THERE. THE FUTURE LAND USE PEPPER. THE ENVISIONED GARLAND PLAN DESIGNATES THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS A BUSINESS CENTER. AND THE PROPOSED USE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE TOP LEFT IS VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SOUTH INTERNATIONAL ROAD. AND TOP RIGHT IS NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. BOTTOM LEFT IS THE NORTH ENTRANCE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND BOTTOM RIGHT IS NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND HERE IS THE SITE PLAN. AND AS MENTIONED EARLIER.

SOME OF THESE ARE ALREADY EXISTING BUILDINGS. UM THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO ADD ADDITIONAL, UM ADDITIONAL CANOPIES AND. STORAGE BUILDING TO IMPROVE THE TRAFFIC FLOW OF THE EXISTING RECYCLING SALVAGE YARD, SO IT WILL BE DIVIDED INTO TWO PHASES. THE FIRST PHASE WILL HAVE THREE PREFABRICATED BUILDINGS, WHICH ARE THE GREEN, UM BOXES HERE. AND THREE SHADED CANOPY STRUCTURES. AND 80 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES, SO SOME OF THESE WILL BE IN THE NORTH SIDE AND SOME OF THESE WILL BE ON THE SOUTH SIDE. AND PHASE TWO WILL HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10 CANOPIES, WHICH ARE THOSE DASH LINES HERE. IMPROVE TRAFFIC FLOW AND 40 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES, WHICH WILL BE INTO THE SOUTH PROPERTY. AND HERE IS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO FOLLOW THE APPROVED LANDSCAPING FROM 2019, AND THAT'S JUST ENHANCE LANDSCAPING ALONG INTERNATIONAL ROAD. AND THEY WILL ALSO LANDSCAPE ALL THE NEW PARKING SPACES TO COMPLY WITH GDC REQUIREMENTS. THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS. THIS IS FOR BUILDING ONE. IT'S BUILDING TWO AND THREE. THE CANOPY ELEVATION. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS TO SCP TO BE IN EFFECT FOR 20 YEARS. AND

[00:30:13]

I'M JUST GONNA ADD WITH TWO YEARS LIKE, COULDN'T WE ADD IF WE APPROVE IT A CONDITION THAT NOTHING CAN BE. HIGHER THAN X Y Z OR OR BE VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. PROBABLY HAVE TO BREAK IT DOWN INTO TWO PARTS. I COULD PILE STUFF HIGH WITHIN THE BUILDINGS, BUT BUT OUTSIDE RESTRICTION WOULD THAT BE APPROPRIATE? YEAH. OKAY? I BELIEVE THAT'S IT.

TAKE THE NEXT FEW CASES. LUCKY YOU, RIGHT? WELCOME. HERE WE GO. ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT, MR CHAIRMAN COMMISSIONERS. THIS IS A STREET ZONING REQUEST. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE DISTRICT TO COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT IN ORDER TO ALLOW BEAUTY SALON AND THE EXISTING BUILDING. THE LOCATION INCLUDES TWO ADDRESSES . 29 40 BROADWAY BOULEVARD AND 29 55 DAIRY ROAD, THE ACREAGE OF THE PROPERTIES JUST UNDER HALF AN ACRE. AND AGAIN THE CURRENT ZONING, HIS NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE DISTRICT. HERE'S A GENERAL LOCATION MAP. NEAR BROADWAY AND DAIRY. NOT TOO FAR FROM THE BROADWAY CENTERVILLE INTERSECTION. AND THIS IS THE SPECIFIC LOCATION. HERE. RIGHT AT THE NORTH CORNER OF DAIRY AND BROADWAY. THE THERE IS AN EXISTING BUILDING ON SITE AS WELL AS PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BUILDING. IT'S A MULTI TENANT BUILDING CURRENTLY. BUT AGAIN, THE APPLICANT WISHES TO MOVE A BEAUTY SALON INTO THE BUILDING. AS A TENANT, HOWEVER, THE NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE DISTRICT DOES NOT ALLOW THAT PER THE ZONING. YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THE SURROUNDING AREA TO THE NORTH, OF COURSE, IS MORE NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE ZONING THAT LAND IS VACANT. IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTH OF THAT IS A OFFICE KIND OF SOCIAL SERVICE TYPE OFFICE. ALSO ZONE NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE, UM TO

[00:35:06]

THAT'S LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM BROADWAY. AND THIS IS LOOKING NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY KIND OF VACANT LAND THAT'S IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTH. THIS BOTTOM LEFT HAND PHOTO IS LOOKING KIND OF SOUTH SOUTH EAST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. TOWARDS THAT MULTI TENANT RETAIL BUILDING I MENTIONED EARLIER. AND THEN THIS IS LOOKING WEST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ALONG BROADWAY. ANOTHER PHOTO HERE COMMUNITY STORE AND GAS STATION LOOKING EAST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ACROSS THE DAIRY. THAT'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST THE CHANGE IN ZONING FROM NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE DISTRICT COMMUNITY RETAIL. THIS IS A STREET ZONING REQUEST, SO THERE'S NO PLAN DEVELOPMENT OR DETAILED PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REQUEST. IT IS A CHANGE IN ZONING ONLY. AND WE MAILED OUT 38 NOTIFICATION LETTERS ON THIS CASE, AND WE RECEIVED JUST ONE RESPONSE THAT WAS AGAINST THE REQUEST WITHIN THE NOTIFICATION AREA. I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONED ON UH, WHEN WE REDID THE G D. C.

PRIOR TO DOING THAT. I BELIEVE PERSONAL SERVICES HAD TO GET S UPS THAT WE MAKE THAT BY RIGHT INTO THE CURRENT GDC FOR COMMUNITY RETAIL. SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO COME BACK FOR A THAT'S CORRECT COMMUNITY RETAIL. IT IS BY, RIGHT? YES SIR. CHANGES OWNING IS APPROVED, THEY WILL BE ABLE TO GO TO THE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT FOR THEIR CEO. YES, THANK YOU. ON THE RESPONSE THAT CAME BACK AGAINST THERE WASN'T ANY COMMENTARY ON IT. HAS ANYBODY IN THE OFFICE SPOKEN TO HIM? IS THERE ANY KIND OF REASONING. DO WE KNOW WHY? WE DON'T KNOW WHY AND NO, I DON'T BELIEVE WE'VE SPOKEN TO THEM. CURIOUS THANK YOU LEAVE. THAT'S IT. MOVE ONTO THE NEXT CASE HERE. THIS IS THE 22-49. AND THIS IS A REQUEST TO ALLOW A FOOD PROCESSING FACILITY AND AN EXISTING BUILDING. LOCATION IS 26 10 MCCREE ROAD. THE APPLICANT IS SCOUT CALLED LOGISTICS LLC, AND THE ACREAGE OF THE SPECIFIC SIDE IS ABOUT 9.7 ALMOST 9.8 ACRES, AND THE CURRENT ZONING IS INDUSTRIAL. THIS PARTICULAR LAND USE THE FOOD PROCESSING LAND USE REQUIRES AN S U P IN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SO THAT IS THE IMPETUS BEHIND THIS REQUEST. THIS IS THE CITYWIDE LOCATION MAP SHOWING THE GENERAL LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT, PROPERTY AND MORE SPECIFICALLY SHOWN HERE. AS OUTLINED HERE KIND OF TOWARDS THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE OVERALL DALLAS FOOD CENTER.

WHICH ENCOMPASSES THIS LARGER SITE, MOSTLY TO THE EAST ALONG THE CREE ROAD. THIS SITE CAN BE ACCESSED FROM ACRI ROAD. SO THE PROPOSAL THE S U P FOR THIS FOOD PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION.

USED AS THEY WOULD MOVE INTO THIS EXISTING BUILDING, WHICH THE DATA HERE. IT'S APPROXIMATELY 150,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING THE PROPOSED USE TENANT WHICH IS SALAD AND GO BY THE WAY, THIS WOULD BE A PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION CENTER FOR SALAD AND GO. THEY WOULD COMPRISE OF ABOUT FOUR OF 114,000 SQUARE FEET OF THE BUILDING THAT INCLUDES A SMALL UP UPPER FLOOR AREA. BUT OTHERWISE THE APPLICANT DOES NOT PROPOSE ANY CHANGES TO THE SITE.

THERE WOULD BE MOVING IN ONLY OTHER THAN RE STRIPING SOME OF THE EXISTING PARKING THIS WOULD NOT ENTAIL A BUILDING EXPANSION OR ANYTHING ELSE THAT WOULD TRIGGER ADDITIONAL SCREENING OR LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. AND A LITTLE MORE ON THE TENANT SALAD AND GO INCLUDES. THE PROPOSAL INCLUDES INTERIOR RENOVATIONS OF AN EXISTING BUILDING FOR REFRIGERATED FOOD PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY. THE PROPOSED TENANT IS SELLING AND GO AS I MENTIONED THE USE WILL

[00:40:02]

THAT'S A PROPOSED. U HAUL FACILITY. HERE'S A SITE PLAN. IT REALLY JUST REFLECTING THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. YOU CAN SEE THE EXISTING BUILDING OUTLINED HERE AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, OTHER THAN RE STRIPING SOME OF THE PARKING THE APPLICANT IS NOT PROPOSING ANY PHYSICAL CHANGES TO THE SITE. IT'S A S U P FOR THE USE. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THE S U P TO BE IN EFFECT FOR A PERIOD OF 20 YEARS, WHICH ALIGNS WITH THE S U P TIME PERIOD GUIDE FOR THIS PARTICULAR LAND USE AND NO GDC DEVIATIONS HAVE BEEN REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REQUEST. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS APPROVAL. OF THE REQUEST, AND MR CHAIRMAN, WE MAILED OUT 20 LETTERS NOTIFICATION LETTERS ON THIS CASE, AND WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY RESPONSES. I SEE NO QUESTIONS. I'VE GOT ONE MAYBE ADVICE. FEW MONTHS AGO, WE HAD A CASE COME THROUGH COMPOSTING CASE WHERE THEY WERE GOING TO BE LOOKING FOR STUFF LIKE THIS, SO THEY HAVE THROWAWAYS AND STUFF. YOU MAY WANT TO HAVE THEM TALK TO EACH OTHER. MAYBE YOU WOULDN'T WIN A GREAT POINT. OKAY? I BELIEVE THAT WRAPS UP THE ZONING CASES I'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA. WHICH IS A GDC AMEND IT. SO THIS GDC AMENDMENT CAME OUT OF THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE OF THE CITY COUNCIL. THEY REPORTED IT TO THE FOURTH CITY COUNCILOR RECENT WORK SESSION AND SO IT IS FORMALLY COMING FORWARD THROUGH THE PLANE COMMISSION. AND THEN WE'LL GO BACK TO THE FULL COUNCIL FROM HERE, UM FOR A FINAL AND FORMAL VOTE. UM BUT THIS IS REGARDING TWO ITEMS THAT CAME OUT OF COMMITTEE. WINE IS REGARDING REMOVING COVERED PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTI FAMILY. UM AND THE OTHER IS REGARDING CREATING A N F O THIS WEEK. UM I KIND OF BORROWED FROM ANOTHER CITY. UM SINCE WE RECENTLY CREATED AN M F ONE AND F TWO DISTRICT, DEPENDING ON THE DENSITY LEVEL, AND ZERO IS KIND OF GOING A LITTLE BIT DOWN AND DENSITY, SO WE'LL KIND OF JUMP INTO THE DETAILS OF THAT. BUT THIS IS REGARDING THE HORIZONTAL, MULTI FAMILY OR SOMETIMES THEY'RE CALLED SINGLE FAMILY RENTALS. KIND OF CONTEMPLATING THAT LAND USE WITH THE GT, WHICH THE GDC DOES NOT CURRENTLY. CONTEMPLATED IN ANY FASHION. UM, AND WHAT KIND OF START WITH THAT ONE OF THE THAT'S AN ODD FIGHT AT THE TOP, AND IT DIDN'T LOOK LIKE THAT ON MY SCREEN. BUT UM, ANYWAY, THE PART OF THE IMPETUS BEHIND THIS AS I MENTIONED THE GDC DOESN'T REALLY RECOGNIZE THIS TYPE OF MULTI FAMILY OR DEVELOPMENT IN GENERAL, IS THAT, UM, WE'VE HAD A COUPLE OF CROSS, ONE OF WHICH WAS APPROVED NEAR FIRE. WILL AND CASTLE IS THE PARK HOUSE PROMINENT REALTY DEVELOPMENT.

AND WITH THIS STYLE OF DEVELOPMENT, IT'S UM IT KIND OF LEAVES IT A LITTLE OPEN ENDED.

AS FAR AS DO WE APPLY A STAFF. WE APPLY THE SINGLE FAMILY STANDARDS IN THE GDC. OF COURSE , IT NEEDS A PD REGARDLESS OF PLAN DEVELOPMENT, AND IT JUST DOESN'T FIT ANY ZONING CATEGORY CLEANLY. BUT DO WE APPLY THE MULTI FAMILY STANDARDS? DO WE APPLY THE SINGLE FAMILY STANDARDS? DO WE MIX? IF SO, WHAT DO WE MIXING WHERE WE APPLYING? WHAT ARE WE NOT? WHAT ARE THOSE DEVIATIONS LOOK LIKE EXACTLY SO. THIS WOULD KIND OF CAPTURE THE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE MOST PART. SO THESE ARE JUST SOME RENDERINGS FROM THAT APPROVED DEVELOPMENT. I MENTIONED NEAR FIREWALL PARKWAY AND CASTLE DRIVE. AS YOU CAN SEE , IT'S ALL A MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND THAT IT'S ONE UM , PLANTED PROPERTY UNDER ONE OWNERSHIP, AND THE UNITS ARE ALL RENTALS, BUT IT'S DEVELOPED AND MORE OF A SINGLE FAMILY STYLE RATHER THAN YOUR TRADITIONAL 2345 STORY, MULTI FAMILY BUILDING. SO FOLKS TEND TO HAVE MAYBE A LITTLE YARD AND MAYBE SOME UNITS THAT ARE ATTACHED. BUT FOR THE MOST PART, IT'S A PRETTY MOSTLY SINGLE FAMILY STYLE, SO, UM, AS YOU RECALLED, WE RECENTLY CREATED KIND OF BROKE OUT AND IN F ONE AND F TWO DISTRICT KIND OF STAIR STEPPING THE DENSITY LEVEL, ALLOWING THE ALLOWABLE DENSITY LEVELS TO INCREASE IN THE CASE OF THE MF TWO DISTRICT, WHICH NOW ALLOWS UP TO 32 UNITS PER ACRE. THIS

[00:45:04]

I CAN CONTINUE FOR THE COVERED COVERED PARKING COMMISSIONER PARIS. JUST A COUPLE OF QUICK QUESTIONS HERE BECAUSE I DID STRUGGLE WITH WHY'S SINGLE FAMILY IS NOT MORE CONSIDERED AS THE NEW GDC STANDARD, WHETHER IT IS, UH, LABELED DIFFERENTLY OR NOT, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE A LOT OF THE DESIGN THE HORIZONTAL STRUCTURING OF IT, THE LOT USAGE SEEM MORE RELEVANT FOR SINGLE FAMILY JUST TO HAVE CONSISTENCY ACROSS WHEN WE LOOK AT SINGLE FAMILY, I KNOW SPECIFICALLY FOR THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS THERE BY UM, SQUARE FOOTAGE, SO I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT I REALLY UNDERSTOOD THE DRIVER OF MULTI FAMILY VERSUS SINGLE FAMILY. WHY CAN'T WE STAY IN THE SINGLE FAMILY SPACE? BECAUSE YOU'RE YOU JUST CITED. YOU KNOW , DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AROUND SINGLE FAMILIES, SEVERAL ITERATIONS AROUND SINGLE FAMILY THAT IT MAKES SENSE TO STAY WITHIN THAT CONSISTENCY, SO JUST REALLY TRYING TO REALLY UNDERSTAND THE DRIVER FROM MULTI FAMILY AS THE AH, HOW DID LAND THERE? YOU KNOW, SO I WANTED TO JUST CONFIRM RIGHT, WELL AGAIN AT THE END OF THE DAY. IT IS A MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. BECAUSE THIS IS ALL THEY'RE ALL RENTALS. IT'S ALL ONE APARTMENT , MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPER MANAGEMENT COMPANY IF YOU WILL.

UM BUT THE UNITS ARE JUST DEVELOPED IN A MORE KIND OF HORIZONTAL OR SINGLE FAMILY FASHION, BUT BUT, YES, YOU'RE RIGHT IN TERMS OF THE BUILDING THE DESIGN THE LAYOUT, THE WE, IT MAKES MORE SENSE TO APPLY MORE SINGLE FAMILY STYLE. THAT'S REALLY WHAT IT'S AIMING TOWARDS GIVING THEIR RENTERS MORE OF AN EXPERIENCE HAVING FEWER UM, NEIGHBORS THAT SHARE WALLS, SHARE CEILINGS AND FLOORS AND THAT SORT OF THING GIVING MORE OF A YARD AND SOME OPEN SPACE.

BUT OF COURSE, THE BENEFIT OF APPLYING CERTAIN MULTI FAMILY STANDARDS AS YOU GET THE AMENITIES AS I MENTIONED, WHICH THAT WAS ONE THING THAT, UM PARK HOUSE ANYTHING WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A DEVIATION ON THE CLUBHOUSE SIZE, THEY PROVIDED THE REQUIRED AMENITIES AND, OF

[00:50:05]

THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER JENKINS THEN COMMISSIONED DALTON. GOOD EVENING, SIR. YES, I'D LIKE TO KIND OF PICK YOU BACK ON WHAT COMMISSIONER HARRIS IS JUST PARIS. PARIS IS JUST SAID, UM BY WE HAVE RECENTLY CONSIDERED A NUMBER OF CHANGES TO THE G. D. C. URBAN RESIDENTIAL FAMILY DISTINCTIONS. MY QUESTION IS, IS THAT SOME POINT WE'RE JUST MAKING THIS TOO COMPLEX FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING IT COMPLEX. AND THAT HOLD ONTO THAT FIRST ONE. THAT'S OKAY. WELL AND THEN THE SECOND QUESTION IS, I'M HOPING THAT SO I LISTENED TO THE DSC MEETING, AND THERE WAS SOME, UH QUESTION ABOUT. AH YOU KNOW WHY RUFUS PITCHED. AND I'M HOPING THAT THAT YOU KNOW WE CAN . WE CAN SEE SOME SORT OF ENLIGHTENMENT SURROUNDING WHAT? WHY IS EVERYONE PITCHED AND ONE OF THE BENEFITS TO HAVING A FLAT ROOF STRUCTURE AS OPPOSED TO, YOU KNOW, ETCETERA, ETCETERA, SO THERE WE GO. THERE'S TWO OF THEM. SURE, SURE. UM. YEAH ON THE FIRST ONE THAT THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. I MEAN, CERTAINLY, YOU KNOW SOME CITIES OF APPROACH TO KIND OF STICK WITH THIS STYLE OF DEVELOPMENT OF APPROACH THAT JUST AS SAYING , WELL, WE'LL APPROACH EVERYONE ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS THROUGH THE P D PROCESS THAT SEEMED TO BE THE MOST PREVALENT. UM MY UNDERSTANDING IS KIND OF HOW IT ORIGINATED WAS, YOU KNOW, LET'S GO AHEAD AND RECOGNIZE IT IN SOME FASHION IN THE G. D. C. SO WE'RE NOT KIND OF HAVING TO, UM , SORT OF ON THE FLY, YOU KNOW, FIGURE OUT WHICH SINGLE FAMILY STANDARDS APPLY, WHICH MULTI FAMILY STANDARDS APPLY. AND WHAT DO THEY DEVIATING FROM? EXACTLY SO THE DIRECTION DID COME FROM THE COUNCIL LEVEL TO HAVE A DISTRICT AVAILABLE. OF COURSE, STAFF WENT AND DID THE HOMEWORK AND KIND OF BROUGHT SOME DRAFT LANGUAGE AND HAD THAT DISCUSSION WITH THE COMMITTEE. OF COURSE. UM SO IF APPROVED, OF COURSE, WE HAVE THE M F ZERO AND F ONE, WHICH IS YOUR STANDARD 18 UNITS PER ACRE. AND THEN MF TWO. UM I THINK WE MENTIONED A WHILE BACK. THERE'S AN URBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AS WELL. THAT ALREADY EXISTS IN THE G D. C. THAT'S FOR THE MUCH MORE DENSE STYLE OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT. BUT UM THE SECOND QUESTION ABOUT ROOF PITCH. YEAH I THINK THAT WAS JUST SOMETHING THAT COMMITTEE DIDN'T FEEL IT MAY BE A BIT DIFFICULT, DEPENDING ON THE NUMBER OF UNITS IN THE BUILDING TO ADMINISTER THAT, AND THEY DIDN'T FEEL THAT WAS AN IMPORTANT ENOUGH ASPECT TO, UM APPLY IN THIS CASE IN THE STYLE OF DEVELOPMENT. CERTAINLY IT IS AN EXISTING REQUIREMENT FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DEVELOPMENT. THAT'S WHERE YOU'RE ON YOUR INDIVIDUALLY PLANTED ROOFS, BUT, UM, AS FAR AS THE BENEFIT, OF COURSE, YOUR ROOF PITCH ROOF PITCHED ROOFS. UM ALLOW FOR A LITTLE MORE INTERESTING ARCHITECTURE. I THINK THE GDC A NUMBER OF TIMES TENDS TO DISCOURAGE, UM FLAT BUILDINGS, LACK OF ARTICULATION . SO IT KIND OF GOES HAND IN HAND WITH THAT TRYING TO ENCOURAGE MORE ARTICULATION, SO TO SPEAK OVERALL ON THE BUILDING , BUT IN THIS CASE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ROOF PITCH IF IT IS APPROVED WITH THE REMOVAL OF ROOF PITCH THE OTHER BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS, ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS ARTICULATION, THOSE WOULD STILL APPLY. TO EACH BUILDING. OKAY DID YOU HAVE A FOLLOW UP IN THERE, COMMISSIONER? AND I, I GUESS I UNDERSTAND WHAT THE GOAL HERE IS . I GUESS THE CONCERN IS IF THE DEVELOPER COMES TO US, AND YOU KNOW, THEY SAY WE'RE GOING TO WANT SOME SOME DEVIATIONS IN ANY CASE WITH ANY CATEGORY. THEN WHY NOT JUST ALLOW THE DEVELOPER TO TELL US WHAT WOULD BE BEST AT THAT SPOT? AS OPPOSED TO ATTEMPTING TO KIND OF PATCHWORK. YOU KNOW SOMETHING THAT WILL THAT WILL BE HOPEFULLY PALATABLE , PALATABLE TO THE DEVELOPER IN THE LONG TERM, BUT I THINK I SAID, I UNDERSTAND THAT'S THEORY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER DALTON. THANK YOU.

YES COMMISSIONER JENKINS KIND OF TOUCHED ON WHAT? MY QUESTION MY THINKING WAS HERE. SO WE DETERMINED EXACTLY WHICH ONE IF NOT ALL THE RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS WILL BE CARRIED INTO THIS PARTICULAR. UH APPROVAL. WILL IT BE AS THEY STAND NOW FOR SINGLE FAMILY OR WHAT WOULD BE CUTTING OR PICKING AND CHOOSING WHICH ONES WE'RE GOING TO LET THEM HAVE. IT'S SPECIFIES, ACTUALLY, ON THIS SLIDE IN FRONT OF YOU. I'LL GO BACK THROUGH IT HERE THE COURSE I MENTIONED DENSITY. THE DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE M F ZERO WOULD FOLLOW MULTI FAMILY STANDARDS FOR AMENITIES.

[00:55:04]

IT WOULD HAVE THE SAME PURPOSE. WE'D JUST BE DELAYED RIGHT IN THE SAME THINGS ARE GOING TO RECOMMEND. I JUST THINK THAT YOUR IDEAS ARE STARTED WITH. YEAH COMMISSIONER JENKINS THERE ? YEAH. ARE WE CREATING MORE OF A PROBLEM? ALRIGHT ALRIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND THEN I GUESS YOU WANTED TO GO ABOUT THE COVERED PARKING NOW. OH, YES. I'M SO SORRY. YEAH. I WAS ABOUT TO SKIP RIGHT OVER IT. YES THAT WAS THE OTHER ITEM THAT CAME OUT OF COMMITTEE. MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE KIND OF BACKGROUND OF THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDING THIS IS THE FREQUENCY OF DEVIATIONS REQUESTED BY MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPERS THAT HAVE TO DO WITH COVERED PARKING. IN SOME CASES, IT'S REQUESTING REDUCTION OF COVERED PARKING TICKET BACK BACK UP A LITTLE BIT. THESE ARE THE EXISTING COVERED PARKING EXCUSE ME. PARKING REGULATIONS IN GENERAL FOR MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS IN FRONT OF YOU HERE, BUT THE PORTION THAT THE COMMITTEE IS RECOMMENDING TO BE REMOVED AS THAT LAST PART AT LEAST 50. TO BE COVERED. THAT CAN BE THROUGH CARPORTS OR GARAGES. BUT USUALLY, DEVELOPERS ARE HAVING TO ADD A CERTAIN NUMBER OF CARPORTS IN ORDER TO HIT THAT 50% MARK. SO WE FOUND THAT OFTENTIMES APPLICANTS WILL REQUEST DEVIATIONS THAT WHERE THEY CAN'T QUITE HIT THAT 50% FOR ONE REASON OR ANOTHER, OR THEY FEEL. I BELIEVE WE HAD ONE DEVELOPER RECENTLY THAT SAID, THEY REALLY DON'T LIKE TO EXCEED MUCH MORE THAN ABOUT 2025% AND THEIR DEVELOPMENTS. UM, MAY HAVE TO DO WITH UM. RESIDENTS BEING ABLE TO PAY THAT MONITORING. YOU KNOW HOW MUCH THEY GET USED VERSUS UNUSED. UM OFTENTIMES AS WELL IN RELATION TO DEVIATIONS AS AN APPLICANT WILL MEET THE 50% REQUIREMENT, BUT IT MAY TRIGGER OTHER DEVIATIONS IN ORDER TO FIT ALL THE CARPORT. SO WE OFTENTIMES SEE SETBACK VARIANCES AND, UM UH, YEAH. YEAH USUALLY IT RELATES TO A SETBACK VARIANTS. IN MOST CASES WHEN THEY'RE MEETING THE 50% PARKING REQUIREMENTS, SO ANYWAY, THE COMMITTEE DID RECOMMEND, UM THAT THAT BE REMOVED WITH THE

[01:00:03]

THANK YOU, MR CHAIRMAN. UM, WELL, BUILDING ON. WHAT? UH, AH , COMMISSIONER JENKINS WAS SAYING, UM SUPPORTING ZERO FROM 50% THAT'S THAT'S A BIG ASK, UMT WE HAVE TO HAVE NUMBERS OF WHAT

[01:05:01]

THAT'S REALLY ALL I HAD TO HAD TO SAY ABOUT IT. WE'LL FINISH UP BY SAYING, YEAH, I AGREE.

REMEMBER THE DISCUSSIONS WERE BACK IN 2014 2015. WHEN YOU'RE DOING THE G D. C TO REQUIRE THIS TO BRING MORE VALUE AND QUITE FRANKLY, SHADE TWO PARKING SPACES, BUT IT'S A VERY SCENE.

WE DIDN'T ANTICIPATE THAT TIME THAT THE DEVELOPERS AND SAY I CAN CHARGE FOR THIS AND THEN MAYBE ONLY HALF OF THEM GET RID OF THAT AND THE OTHER HALF HAVE BECOME UNUSABLE, AND WE'VE CREATED PARKING ISSUES, SO A REDUCTION IN NUMBERS ARE GOOD. YOU KNOW, I WOULD ALSO PROPOSE WHEN THAT LAST APPLICANT CAME AND WANTED TO GET RID OF MOST OF THE COVERED PARKING I HAD SUGGESTED. LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE THAT REQUIRES THAT YOU KNOW, 50% OF THE PARKING SURFACE IS A SHADED SO MANY YEARS OUT THAT WOULD HELP INCREASE THE VALUE AND PROVIDE SHADE FOR THE CLIENTS. SO MAYBE WE DO A LITTLE SWITCH HERE. DROP THINGS DOWN 2025% AND THEN KICK IN THE LANDSCAPING THAT THEY PUT ENOUGH TREES IN THAT 10 YEARS DOWN THE ROAD. HAVE THE HAVE THE PARKING SUN SHADE. THANK YOU, SIR. AND THE MAINTENANCE OF THEY'VE GOT MAINTENANCE CLAUSES THAT THEY'VE BUT LEGAL HAS DONE SOME WONDERFUL MAINTENANCE CLOSET IF YOU'VE READ SOME OF THE ORDINANCES LATELY. MHM ALREADY. THANK YOU. AND I THINK THE LAST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS ELECTION OF OFFICERS AFTER THAT. SO I THINK WE'RE DONE WITH OUR BRIEFING. SO UNTIL SEVEN O'CLOCK WE ARE IN RECESS.

[Call to Order]

AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. AGAIN. GOOD EVENING AND WELCOME. I SEE MANY OF YOU OUR SIGNING UP TO SPEAK

[01:10:12]

IF YOU COME UP TO SPEAK, PLEASE PUT YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. I MEAN, SPEAK YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS INTO THE MICROPHONE. WE STILL NEED THAT FOR THE RECORDS ON THE TAPE. EXCUSE ME. WE ALLOW APPLICANTS 15 MINUTES TO PRESENT THEIR CASE. OTHER SPEAKERS WE ALLOW THREE IF YOU'RE SPEAKING FOR HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, WE DEFINITELY ALLOW MORE TIME.

AFTER EVERYBODY SPOKEN WELL, THAT'S THE AFRICAN BACK UP TO UM FINISH UP HIS COMMENTS. AND.

[Consent Agenda]

COMMISSION, DALTON. WHO A WAS WITHDRAWN AND I DON'T BELIEVE YOU MENTIONED UH, THAT THAT HAD BEEN WITHDRAWN. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY SO ITEM TO A HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN, SO ANY MOTION WILL NOT INCLUDE ITEM TO A MR CHAIR. COMMISSION DALTON LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION WE APPROVE THE CONSIDERED GENDER AS POSTED MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DALTON THE 1ST 2ND. HMM. BUT COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS PLEASE WILL HMM. AND JUST A SECOND. ELECTRONIC HAVE GIVEN US ALL HOME HOME NEW MEANING OF TIME. IF IT DOESN'T HAPPEN IMMEDIATELY. THERE WE GO. THAT PASSAGE UNANIMOUSLY. SO THE CONSENT AGENDA MINUS ITEM TO A HAS BEEN APPROVED. ONTO OUR ZONING CASES. OUR FIRST ONE IS A

[Items 3A & 3B]

[01:15:03]

ALL RIGHT. OKAY. THANK YOU. I HAVE NO OTHER SPEAKERS LISTED. IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE WHO IN THE AUDIENCE? WE SHOULD SPEAK IN THIS CASE? SEEING NONE. COMMISSIONERS DISCUSSION. MR CHAIR. MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED THIS REQUEST. THIS REQUEST.

EXCUSE ME, AS PRESENTED SECOND MOTION BY COMMISSIONER JENKINS, THE SECOND BACK COMMISSIONER, PAIRS TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED THE APPLICATION. I M D. A AND B.

THERE WOULD BE THE ZONING AND THE DETAILED PLAN. SO, YOU KNOW, DISCUSSION. PLEASE VOTE. AND THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. NEXT ITEM IS ALSO TWO PARTER CONSIDERATION. THE

[Items 3C & 3D]

GOOD EVENING. HONORABLE PLAN COMMISSION. MY NAME IS ANTHONY ATALA, 73 12 OAK BLUFF DRIVE IN DALLAS, TEXAS. UM I'M ONE OF THE OWNERS OF GRENADIER HOMES AND I THOUGHT IT WOULD MAKE A PRESENTATION. UM I DO HAVE A NUMBER OF SLIDES TO SHOW I'LL TRY TO MOVE THROUGH THIS FAIRLY QUICKLY AND I'M SURE YOU MAY HAVE A NUMBER OF QUESTIONS TO ASK ME. UM JUST TALKING ABOUT WHO WHO WAS GRANTED THEIR HOMES BECAUSE WE'RE PROBABLY NOT THAT WELL KNOWN. WE'RE A SMALL HOME BUILDER. WE'VE BEEN IN BUSINESS HERE IN DALLAS SINCE 1991. UM, MYSELF AND MY BUSINESS PARTNER, JONATHAN ATIS. WE'VE KNOWN EACH OTHER SINCE WE WERE FIVE. SO WE GO WAY BACK TO 1970. DON'T DO THE MATH ANYWAY. UM SO. LAST YEAR OR THIS PAST YEAR WE'VE BUILT ABOUT 300 TOWN HOUSES. WE DECIDED TO FOCUS ON TOWN HOUSES. UM WE HAVE THE BASICALLY THE LONGEST HISTORY OF ANY BUILDER IN THE METROPLEX DOING TOWN HOUSES. WE STARTED OUR FIRST ONE BACK IN 1993 AND THE HISTORIC ST THOMAS AREA. UM YOU'LL SEE, I'LL SHOW YOU SOME PICTURES. WE'VE DONE A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTS FROM URBAN MID RISE RESIDENCES, CUSTOM LAKE HOMES, PATIO HOMES, SINGLE FAMILY VILLAS AND TOWN HOMES. ABOUT FIVE YEARS AGO, WHEN WE WERE TRYING TO BE EVERYTHING TO EVERYBODY SORRY. TALK WITH MY HANDS. UM WE DECIDED TO JUST FOCUS ON TOWN HOUSES WHAT WE HAD STARTED ON BACK IN 1993. AND THAT'S ALL WE DO. NOW WE BUILD TOWN HOUSES. UM AND THE PRODUCT

[01:20:04]

IT WAS MY FIRST CALL TO THE CITY WAS TO JUST KIND OF FIND OUT. WHAT IS THE ZONING LIKE? AND I'VE GOT IT CIRCLED IN RED HERE. UM BUT IT'S BASICALLY COMPACT NEIGHBORHOOD ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER AND URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER, BOTH OF WHICH WHICH ANTICIPATED SOMETIME IN THE FUTURE, COULD BE TOWN HOUSES. TOWNHOUSES WAS ALLOWED WITHIN THAT ZONING. UM SO WE FELT MORE COMFORTABLE IN TERMS OF TRYING TO PURSUE AND MOVE FORWARD AND WORK WITH THE STAFF.

I PRESENT THE SITE PLAN, WHICH HAS RIGHT NOW, 100 AND 56 TOWN HOUSES. UM SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE REALLY LIKE ABOUT THE COMMUNITY. WE'RE MAXIMIZING SORT OF VIEWS TO THE WE CALL IT A LAKE TO THE WEST. UM HOMES. IT COULD BE EITHER, TOO. I THINK IT WAS INTRODUCED BY A BEER THAT THE TOWN HOUSES OVER THREE STORIES OVERLOOKING THE POND. WE HAVE AN OPTION TO DO A THIRD STORY WITH A NICE ROOFTOP TERRORISTS, WE THINK WOULD BE A GREAT LOCATION FOR THIS. MOST OF OUR PRODUCT, WE BELIEVE WILL BE TWO STORIES. UM RATHER THAN THREE STORIES, BUT WE HAVE THAT ABILITY TO ADD THAT IN AND IT'S JUST GOING TO BE BASED ON THE MARKET DEMAND IF THERE IS MORE DEMAND. FOR THAT TYPE OF HOUSING WITH THAT TYPE OF TERRORISTS, ALL OF OUR HOMES AND AS I GO THROUGH THIS HAVING OUTDOOR SPACE, SO EVEN THOUGH, UM THERE'S A GARAGE ON ONE END ON THE OTHER SIDE IS ABOUT A 15 BY 15 OUTDOOR SPACE. EVERYBODY HAS A TWO CAR PARKING SPACE, TWO CAR GARAGE AND AN OUTDOOR SPACE. WE'RE PROVIDING AN AMENITY CENTER ON THE WEST SIDE THAT OVERLOOKS THE POND, AND I'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE AMENITY CENTER. WE ENVISION A DOG PARK ON THE EAST SIDE. I THINK THERE WAS A QUESTION AS TO HOW MUCH OF THE FOREST AND THE CREEK AREA ON THE EAST SIDE WE WERE IMPACTING . AND I THINK IF YOU LOOK AT THIS LAYOUT HERE, YOU CAN SEE THE APARTMENTS SOUTH OF US AND WHERE THEY DREW THEIR LINE. UM AND WHILE WE'LL LOOK AT THAT A LITTLE BIT MORE IN DETAIL, BUT WE'RE FURTHER WEST OF THE OF THE

[01:25:03]

UM THERE'S TOWN HOUSES THAT FRONT ONTO BOTH CAMPBELL AND SHILOH. BUT, UM, THE LAND SINCE IT'S REALLY THERE'S A BIG SLOPE . I THINK HE HAD MENTIONED EARLIER THAT THERE'S RETAINING WALLS SO BASICALLY THE SLOPE THE SITE GOES LIKE THIS, AND YOU'RE KIND OF TRYING TO FLATTEN THE SIDE OUT, WHICH MEANS THEY'LL BE A RETAINING WALL ON THE SIDE OF THE POND AREA. AND WE'LL HAVE TO PUT A FENCE UP ALONG THAT AND THEN, UH, THERE'S WE'RE GOING TO BE PROBABLY ABOUT 5 TO 6 FT, BELOW SHILOH AND CAMPBELL ON THE WEST SIDE AND ON THE EAST SIDE, PROBABLY ABOUT THREE OR FOUR FT . SO THEY'RE GOING TO BE SUNKEN DOWN. AND THEN THERE'S ALSO, UM , SIX FT BRICK MASONRY WALL. SO IT ALL SHOWS SORT OF WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE. UM THAT'S KIND OF THE SITE PLAN. WE DID AN OVERLAY BECAUSE WE HAD HEARD THAT THERE WERE SOME CONCERNS THAT WE WERE GOBBLING UP A LOT OF THE FORESTED AREA ON THE EAST SIDE. UM AND WE SHOW THIS. THEY'RE SORT OF LIKE A LITTLE AREA THAT SORT OF JUMPS OUT. UM ON THE FORESTED AREA, AND SO I THINK THERE'S ABOUT FIVE HOUSES IN THAT AREA. UM, WE ARE COMING BACK AND PLANTING BETWEEN BOTH SIDES. ALMOST 300 TREES THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE PUTTING IN. SO I THINK WHAT WE'RE GOING TO BE TAKING OUT AS A HANDFUL OF TREES. AND SO THERE WILL BE A LOT MORE TREES THAN WE STARTED WITH ON THE SITE SITE. PRETTY MUCH IS BARE OF IF YOU LOOK AT THIS PICTURE HERE. THERE'S NOT MUCH OTHER THAN THAT GREEN SPACE IN THE CREEK AREA. WE LOVE THAT CREEK AREA, SO WE WEREN'T TRYING TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT, AND WE DEFINITELY DON'T WANT TO MESS IT UP AND REMOVE IT. SO, UM ANYWAY. THAT WAS. OUR OUR VISION AND THEN JUST SORT OF TALKING ABOUT WE'VE GOT SOME RENDERINGS THAT SHOW THIS SITE IS RENDERED ALL IN THREE D SO WE CAN SORT OF SHOW YOU THE DIFFERENT AREAS OF THE SITE. UM THE RENDERINGS. I DON'T THINK DO A REALLY GOOD JUSTICE OF WHAT THE PRODUCT IS THAT WE'RE PROPOSING, SO WE TOOK SOME PICTURES UP AND WINDSONG RANCH. WHICH IS BASICALLY THE PRODUCT THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT BUILDING HERE. IT'S A CONTEMPORARY TOWN HOME. WE'VE BEEN BUILDING THERE FOR ABOUT 2.5 YEARS. IT'S BEEN OUR MOST SUCCESSFUL. TOWNHOUSE COMMUNITY EVER. WE HAD TO STOP SELLING AT SOME POINT AFTER WE WERE SELLING LIKE 10 A MONTH. AH IT JUST ANYWAY, WHO KNEW THAT IT WAS GOING TO TAKE OFF LIKE THAT? BUT THE WHOLE MARKET WAS CRAZY. BUT I'M GOING TO SHOW YOU A FEW DIFFERENT PHOTOS. THIS IS IT IS HOMES FACING ONTO A STREET, BUT THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF A GREEN SPACE IN THE FRONT. UM, SAME IDEA IT SHOWS. TYPICALLY THERE'S ABOUT FOUR OR FIVE DIFFERENT COLOR EXTERIOR COLOR. ARRANGEMENTS THAT WE USE BETWEEN BRICK STONE, UM, SIDING, AND SO WE'RE DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS SO THEY'RE NOT ALL LOOKING THE SAME. I THINK WHEN YOU LOOK AT OUR RENDERS IN THREE D THEY LOOK A LITTLE BIT MORE SIMILAR, BUT THERE ARE GOING TO BE THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT YOU'RE SEEING IN THIS PICTURE. UM THIS SHOWS TOWN HOUSES ON A SORT OF AMUSED PARK. I THINK MAYBE A MENTIONED OBVIOUSLY, THERE'S SPACES IN OUR COMMUNITY WHERE WE LIKE HAVING PEOPLE FRONTING ONTO A GREEN SPACE RATHER THAN JUST THE STREET. YES WE'RE GOING TO HAVE HOMES THAT FRONT ONTO A STREET AS WELL. BUT THERE'S GIVES PEOPLE DIFFERENT LOOKS AND DIFFERENT THOUGHTS IN TERMS OF WHERE THEY WOULD CHOOSE TO LIVE IN THE COMMUNITY. UM YOU KNOW, WE DID IN RIVER SET. WE DID A ONE STORY VILLA PRODUCT THAT WAS ATTACHED IN RIVER SET. AND THE HOMES. WE DID A NUMBER OF HOMES THAT FRONTED ONTO A PARK AREA WITH AMUSED TYPE SITUATION.

THOSE HOMES SOLD FOR 15 TO $20,000 IN ADDITION TO FRONT ONTO A GREEN SPACE OR SOMETHING VERY POPULAR, AND IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE LIKE TO PRESENT, ESPECIALLY IF YOU'RE SITTING OUT IN YOUR 15 BY 15. FOOT PATIO AREA AND BEING SORT OF CONNECTED WITH NATURE. IT'S BEEN A REALLY UM IT'S SOMETHING THAT OUR HOMEOWNERS REALLY LIKE. THIS SHOWS YOU SORT OF A VISION GOING DOWN THE STREET. UM WITH THE DIFFERENT COLORS THAT WE'VE GOT OF OUR BUILDINGS. THIS IS A STREET ARRANGEMENT WHERE THERE IT'S MORE OF A TRADITIONAL FRONTING ONTO A STREET. AND THEN JUST A LITTLE BIT THAT WE TALKED ABOUT THAT WE'VE GOT SOME CUSTOM BUILDING IN OUR BACKGROUND AND THE DETAIL OF WHAT WE PUT INTO OUR PLANS. IT'S HARD TO SEE FROM A PHOTO FROM A DISTANCE, BUT YOU SEE HOW SORT OF THE NATURAL CEDAR UNDERNEATH THE ROOF LINE ON THE TRELLIS JUST UNDERNEATH THE FRONT DOOR AND WE'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT HOW THIS SORT OF LIVES JUST TO KIND OF GIVE YOU AN IDEA. UM THIS IS THESE ARE PICTURES FROM OUR COMMUNITY. AND IF YOU'RE

[01:30:01]

SO I'M SHOWING YOU A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT SCENARIOS OF HOW SOMEBODY CAN FURNISH THAT SPACE AND USE THAT SPACE EFFECTIVELY. UM AND A LOT OF PEOPLE WILL HANG THOSE CAFE LIGHTS ABOVE THE TRELLIS, WHICH HAS BECOME POPULAR. SO THIS IS, YOU KNOW, TRY TO SHORTEN THIS UP. I'VE GOT A FEW MORE SLIDES TO GO. BUT THIS IS THE THREE D RENDERING OF THE ACTUAL SITE. SO YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE WEST SIDE AND I THINK A BUNCH OF QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN HOW WE IMPACTING THE POND.

WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THE GREEN SPACE AROUND US? WE DON'T OWN THAT SPACE. I THINK IT'S A CITY PARK. AND WE WERE ASKED TO CONNECT INTO THE PARK AREA AND INTO THAT HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL.

WE ACTUALLY WANT TO CONNECT IN BECAUSE WE THINK IT'S A AMENITY FOR HOMEOWNERS. WE FOUND THAT EXERCISE AND WALKING OR KIND OF THE BIGGEST AMENITIES DOG PARK ALSO, SO FOR US, IT'S A BIG DEAL TO BE ABLE TO CONNECT. AND I THINK THE QUESTION WAS ASKED. WHAT ABOUT PARKING AND WHERE DID THESE PEOPLE PARK TO GET ONTO THE TRAIL? FOR OUR HOMEOWNERS, OBVIOUSLY THAT LEAVE OUR COMMUNITY. THEY CAN CONNECT DIRECTLY INTO THE TRAIL. THERE'S A LITTLE GAZEBO DOWN THERE, AND I THINK WE COME IN RIGHT NEAR THE GAZEBO. AND THEN THERE'S A PARKING LOT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF SHILOH THAT YOU CAN PARK A HANDFUL OF CARS. THE TRAIL COMES ACTUALLY UNDERNEATH SHILOH, BUT RIGHT NOW IF YOU COME TO THIS POND AND YOU CAN GO AROUND THE POND, AND YOU CAN GO TO THE, UM , THE GAZEBO. THERE'S NO WAY TO GET UP ONTO THE STREET ON SHILOH WHEN YOU'RE ON THE WEST SIDE, AND THERE'S NO SIDEWALKS, SO I THINK WHAT WILL BE DOING IS BY CONNECTING TRAIL TO SHILOH AND HAVING OUR SIDEWALK ALONG SHILOH. SOMEBODY CAN COME UP OFF OF THE POND. COME UP TO THE WALKING TRAIL ON SHILOH, GO NORTH ON SHILOH AND GO TO THE MEDICAL OR THE, YOU KNOW, GO SHOPPING, SO IT OPENS UP SOME MORE CONNECTIVITY BECAUSE RIGHT NOW THE POND IS A DEAD END. IT'S NICE AND PEACEFUL AND TRANQUIL. I DON'T THINK WE'LL SEE A LOT OF TRAFFIC THAT WE WILL RUIN THE TRANQUILITY OF THE POND. BUT IT'S JUST GIVING MORE FLEXIBILITY OF WORK. AND YOU GO IF YOU COME TO THE POND AND YOU AND YOU'RE WALKING, TOO, SHOULD OPEN UP SOME MORE FLEXIBILITY.

THIS SHOW IS JUST, UM HAVE YOU WERE DRIVING NORTH ON SHILOH AND YOUR PAST OUR ENTRANCE ON THE WEST SIDE, THE AMENITY CENTER IS BEING PUT IN A FAIRLY PROMINENT LOCATION UP IN THE FRONT CORNER SHOWS A LITTLE BIT OF OUR SIGNAGE AND YOU SEE THE HOMES IN THE IN THE PICTURE. THIS IS CENTRAL INTO THE ON THE WEST SIDE. WE'VE GOT A TRIANGULAR INNER PARK AREA SO AGAIN, EVEN THOUGH THESE HOMES SORT OF FRONT ONTO A STREET TECHNICALLY THEIR MUSE LOTS BECAUSE THERE'S A BIG OPEN SPACE AND THEY'RE ON A COMMON AREA. OPEN SPACE. AND THEN THERE'S PARKING ACROSS AS SOMEBODY CAN PARK. THIS SHOWS THE POTENTIAL THREE STORY AND I DON'T WANT EVERYONE TO GET THE WRONG IDEA THAT UM I'M SORRY. I GUESS I'VE GOT A FEW FEW MORE SLIDES. IF YOU GUYS ARE OKAY, TIME WISE, AND IF IT'S JUST A FEW MORE MORE SLIDES. YEAH OKAY, SO THIS IS SHOWING THE THREE STORY OVERLOOKING THE POND. THERE'S GOING TO BE THE RETAINING WALL. YOU TALKED ABOUT BEING ABOUT FOUR FT. AND THAT'S WHAT THE FENCING THIS IS A PARTICULARLY THAT WE'RE KIND OF EXCITED ABOUT THESE HOMES FRONT ONTO EITHER SHILOH OR CAMPBELL. YOU SEE THAT? THERE'S THE RETAINING WALL, WHICH IS THE STONE AT THE BOTTOM, WHICH IS ABOUT FOUR OR 56 FT. TALL AND THEN THE FENCE ABOVE. IT IS ABOUT SIX FT. CREATING A VERY SORT OF PRIVATE AREA FOR PEOPLE TO HAVE. WHAT THERE. IT JUST GIVES SOMEBODY A DIFFERENT CHOICE IF THEY WANT TO BE OUT ON THEIR PATIO, AND THEY'RE NOT LOOKING ACROSS AT SOMEONE ELSE. THIS IS A VERY SORT OF LIKE ZEN SORT OF QUIET AREA FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO ENJOY. UM THIS IS ON THE EAST SIDE WHERE THERE'S ANOTHER MUSE AREA AND HOMES ARE FRONTING ONTO EACH OTHER, AND WE THOUGHT WE'D LEAVE IT FAIRLY OPEN WHERE KIDS COULD PLAY INTO THIS GREEN SPACE. THIS SHOWS ARE AMENITY AREA AND I'LL GO QUICKLY THROUGH UM, THERE'S AN EXERCISE FACILITY IN THE AMENITY AREA YOU CAN SEE HERE. IT'S QUITE A ROBUST EXERCISE FACILITY. COVERED PATIO AREA, AND THEN THERE'S A LITTLE YOGA AREA JUST NEXT TO THE FITNESS FACILITY WITH SOME LIGHTS ABOVE IT. AND THAT'S ALL I HAD. AND I WOULD OPEN IT UP TO ANY QUESTIONS. IF ANYONE HAS ANY OR I CAN COME BACK UP IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. COMMISSIONER ROSE. WHAT'S YOUR TIMING ON BUILDING ALL THIS?

[01:35:06]

ONE OF THE THINGS WE'VE BEEN DOING MORE AND MORE AND DEVELOPMENTS IS GETTING A VARIETY WE'VE BEEN DOING. SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WITH DIFFERENT WIT, LOTS. WE RECENTLY HAD A COUPLE APARTMENTS COME THROUGH. WERE THERE WERE APARTMENTS. AND THEN THERE WERE TOWN HOMES, SO THEY WERE MIXING IT UP AND BUFFERING AND DOING THINGS LIKE THAT. TO TALK DIRECTLY ABOUT TRACK ONE WITH THE POND AND EVERYTHING. UM YOU'VE GOT THOSE BUILDINGS ALL LINED UP. THERE ARE NO SIGHTLINES BETWEEN THEM OR ANYTHING ELSE, AND YOU'VE GOT THREE STORY BUILDINGS ON TOP OF THE WALL, SO IT WILL BE A BLOCKADE FOR THE PEOPLE EXPERIENCING THE PARK. TO BRING AN ITEM NUMBER ONE ABOUT VARIETY , AND THAT IS YOU HAVE A PRODUCT. YOU'RE ONE STORY VILLA PRODUCT THAT I SAW ON YOUR WEBSITE AND EVERYTHING. THOSE WOULD BE MUCH BETTER ALONG THE POND AND ALONG THE PARK. GO TO THE EAST. AND YOU WOULD GET A PREMIUM FOR THOSE YOU CAN STEP BACK IN HAVE TALLER YOUR TWO OR THREE STORIES. THEY WOULD ALSO HAVE A VIEW. YOU GET A PREMIUM FOR THOSE TWO BECAUSE WITH THE THREE STORIES ALONG THE PERIMETER. EVERYTHING'S LOCKED INSIDE. THERE'S NO VIEW. THERE'S NO NOTHING THEY'RE NOT, AND THAT'S WHERE I SAID IT DOESN'T REALLY RESPOND TO THE LAND AND YOUR TOE POSE. PRETTY PRETTY GOD . AWFUL. REALLY ONE OF THE BUILDINGS THAT I KNOW YOU'LL BE CUTTING AND FILLING. IT'S GOT 11 FT DROP FROM WENT INTO THE EXISTING LAND 11 FT. DROP ONE END TO THE OTHER. SO YOU'VE GOT THAT TO DEAL WITH AND. ANOTHER ISSUE IS ON 60 OF THE UNITS. YOU WANT TO FIVE FT DRIVE. INSTEAD OF A 20 FT DRIVE THE 20 FT DRIVERS TO STORE CAR AND WE KNOW PROBABLY HALF THE PEOPLE PUT STUFF IN THEIR GARAGE. SO YOU'LL HAVE 30 UNITS WITH TWO OR MORE CARS, NO PLACE TO PARK THEY'LL FILL UP THE GUEST SPACES WILL BE PARKING ELSEWHERE. SO THAT THAT BECOMES AN ISSUE TOO. YOU WANT ME TO ADDRESS THAT, OR DO YOU WANT TO JUST GO AHEAD AND FILL IT UP AND YOU DON'T HAVE ANY GUEST PARKING NEAR ANY OF THE AMENITIES. SO AND THE AMENITIES ARE SEPARATED, IN ESSENCE, HAVE TWO SITES ACROSS A MAJOR. STREET SO ANYBODY WANTING TO USE A DOG PARK? EITHER GOING TO HAVE TO WALK ACROSS A BUSY STREET DRIVE ACROSS AND IT'S ABOUT 1/10 OF A MILE WALK FOR HIM TO GET TO THE DOG PARK. SAME THING FOR THE POOL. MOST OF THE PEOPLE REALLY WON'T HAVE ACCESS TO IT, AND I LIVE IN A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT'S DIVIDED BY A CREEK WHERE YOU HAVE TO DRIVE AROUND. THERE'S NOT THAT MUCH INTERACTION. THAT THERE SHOULD BE AN EVERYTHING. SO IT'S ALMOST LIKE YOU HAVE TO DEVELOPMENTS THERE. SO I THINK YOU NEED A LITTLE MORE ON EACH SIDE. AND. THE UNITS AND THIS IS MORE ARCHITECTURAL. BUT AGAIN, IT'S TOO USABILITY AND THAT IMPLEMENTATION THOSE UNITS ALONG THE POND FACE SOUTHWEST. THEY CAN'T BE FACING A WORST DIRECTION IN TERMS OF THE SUN, INFUSE YOUR THREE STORY UNITS WITH THE OPEN TERRACE. THEY'RE NOT GOING TO USE THE OPEN TERRORISTS, YOU KNOW? BETWEEN MAY AND OCTOBER BECAUSE IT'S JUST GONNA BURN HIM OUT. NOW YOU DO HAVE COVERAGE OVER SOME OF THE STUFF DOWN BELOW, AND THAT'S THAT'S A GOOD POINT. RIETI SPACING, SO I DON'T THINK IT REALLY RESPONDS TO THE LAND AND THE NEEDS AND. I THINK IT CAN WORK. BUT AGAIN, I SEE THE COSTS IN LINE AND EVERYTHING ELSE DRIVING A NEED. TO MAXIMIZE IT OUT. AND I DON'T THINK THAT PEOPLE WOULD HAVE AS MUCH OF AN ISSUE IF THERE WERE FEWER UNITS THERE. SO THAT I JUST UNLOADED.

THANK YOU, UM WITH REGARDS TO THE FIVE FT PARKING AND WAS SIMILAR TO WHAT WE DID AT RIVER SET. AND WE'VE DONE IT IN A NUMBER OF OUR COMMUNITIES. WE HAVE A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION THAT WE PUT IN PLACE. I DIDN'T REALLY TALK ABOUT THAT. BUT WE PUT RESTRICTIONS ON PARKING. SO

[01:40:05]

YOU MENTIONED LACK OF PARKING NEAR THE AMENITY CENTER. WE HAD PROPOSED TRYING TO ADD SOME PARKING UP IN THIS AREA, BUT IT DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER. SO WE DID ADD A COUPLE OF SPACES HERE. THERE IS A MALE KIOSK AT THE AMENITY CENTER FOR PEOPLE TO PICK UP MAIL. THERE'S ALSO A LOT OF PARKING SPACES HERE WHERE THEY COULD. I MEAN, YES, YOU'RE PROBABLY 100 FT, AWAY FROM THE AMENITY CENTER. WE FELT A BIT MORE OF A PEDESTRIAN SO SOMEBODY COULD PARK AND WALK OVER TO THE AMENITY CENTER. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT IT. UM AND THEN WITH REGARDS TO WE DON'T KNOW IF THEY'RE GOING TO BE THREE STORIES ALONG THE POND BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO CAUSE SOMEBODY AN EXTRA 60 OR $70,000 TO HAVE A ROOFTOP TERRORISTS SO IT'S POSSIBLE THAT A LOT OF THE PRODUCT IS GOING TO END UP BEING . WE ANTICIPATE BEING TWO STORIES WE WANTED TO SHOW. THAT PRODUCT AND THAT VARIABILITY THAT WE HAD UM. I GUESS WE SEE THIS SIDE A LITTLE DIFFERENT THAN YOU DO. AND THAT'S OKAY. UM WE'VE WORKED REALLY HARD ON IT, AND WE FEEL LIKE WE'VE GOT DIFFERENT COMPONENTS GOING ON. SO MAYBE THE PRODUCT IS THE SAME, BUT YOU'VE GOT DIFFERENT VIEWS AND DIFFERENT EXPERIENCES HAPPENING WITHIN THE SITE PLAN.

SO WE'VE TRIED TO REALLY GIVE THAT UM. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU THAT I'M NOT SO I MISSED YOU TRIED. SORRY. I DIDN'T WRITE THEM ALL DOWN. SO, UM, I'M JUST TRYING TO GO OFF OF MEMORY. UM THAT WAS ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT COMMISSIONER ROSE UM, DO YOU INTEND ON KEEPING THIS? UH IF THIS IS DONE. FOR FIVE YEARS. 25 YEARS. HOW LONG YOU BEFORE YOU SELL IT? YAHOO I DIDN'T CLARIFY . IT'S A GOOD QUESTION. THESE ARE ALL FOR SALE. TOWN HOMES.

OKAY SO WE'LL BE SELLING THEM. SO TYPICALLY, THE WAY WE'RE DOING IS WE'RE BUILDING BUILDING BY BUILDING AND THAT'S WHY I SAID IT WOULD TAKE US. PROBABLY ONCE WE START DEVELOPMENT. ONCE THE LOTS ARE READY, IT'LL TAKE US PROBABLY ABOUT THREE OR FOUR YEARS TO COMPLETE, BUILD EVERYTHING AND SELL EVERYTHING. UM IF YOU CHECK INTO OUR BACKGROUND, WE'VE NEVER SOLD TWO

[01:45:05]

YOU CAN'T HAVE ANY AIRBNB. WE'RE NOT LOOKING FOR PEOPLE THAT ARE TRANSIENT THAT ARE MOVING IN AND OUT ON AN AIRBNB TYPE SITUATION . WE WANT TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR TO THE TO THE PEOPLE AROUND US, AND WE WANT TO HAVE PEOPLE THAT HAVE A STAKE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND HER INVESTED. ALRIGHT, GO AHEAD. WILL YOU RETAIN MANAGEMENT OF THE COMMON AREAS AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. SO. FROM DAY ONE. THERE'S A BOARD THAT SET UP AN HOA BOARD. WE WILL RUN THE H O A BOARD OR HAVE A NUMBER . TYPICALLY THERE'S 3 TO 5 PEOPLE THAT SIT ON THE BOARD.

WE'LL HAVE THOSE PLACES TAKEN. AND THEN WE ONCE WE START SELLING HOMEOWNER WILL COME ON THE BOARD. AND THEN WHEN WE'RE TYPICALLY AT 80 TO 90% SOLD THE BOARD TRANSITIONS OVER TO HOMEOWNER CONTROL. AND THEY'RE TAKING OVER THE RUNNING OF THE COMMUNITY. THE DAY TO DAY OPERATIONS ARE RUN BY A THIRD PARTY, UM, PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY. WE DON'T DO THE MANAGEMENT OURSELVES. THEY GET PAID FOR MANAGING THIS AND THEN THEY CONTINUE AFTER WE'RE GONE. AS THE WORD TO DECLARE IT AFTER WE'RE GONE, THEY TAKE OVER THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTINUE. ANY OTHER. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING DOWN. ALRIGHTY I THINK I'VE GOT SOME OTHER SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM. AH! JEAN THIERS. AND IF I MISPRONOUNCED NAMES I DO IT FOR A LIVING. NICE TO SEE THE COMMISSION ON JEAN TASE 26. OH, FIVE HAZELWOOD PLACE IN GARLAND. I APPRECIATE THIS BEING LEFT UP.

THIS WILL HELP A LITTLE BIT. SO I THINK THE PRODUCT AND ALL THAT WE'RE SEEING IS GREAT. I'M ACTUALLY NOT EVEN HERE TO BLESS IT OR ANYTHING. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT HOW THIS COULD BUILDER HAS ANALYZED THE LAND AND THINKS THEY KIND OF KNOW HOW TO RESPOND TO THE LAND. I'M FOCUSED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER WHERE THE POND IS. I'VE KNOWN THE LAND SINCE 2004 AND I'VE SEEN A LOT OF STUFF GOING ON WITH THE POND, WHICH I THINK IS NOW REBRANDED CAMPBELL LAKE. UM SOME DAYS THE LAKE IS DRY DRIES UP COMPLETELY. AND SEVERAL TIMES DURING MY LIFE . THERE HAS BEEN A DAY LOOSE SO APPARENT THAT THE PAGODA THAT YOU REFERRED TO AS COMPLETELY UNDERWATER SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE FOOTPRINT OF WHERE THESE TOWN HOMES ARE STARTING TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE RETAINING WALL I'M THINKING ABOUT THE SLOPE OF THE LAND HOW THE WATER RUSH HAPPENS NOW WITH GOOD GREEN GRASS AND WITHOUT THE OTHER ELEVATION, MY HOUSE IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WOODS ON THE SIDE OF THE CREEK AND FOR EACH PIECE OF GREEN SPACE WE LOSE, REPLACED WITH CONCRETE OR PITCHED ROOFS THAT ARE 33 STORIES TALL. THE VELOCITY TO THAT WATER RUSHED TO THAT CREEK JUST SPEEDS UP AND IT IS ABSOLUTELY STRIPPING OUT THE WALL THAT SUPPORTS OUR HOME. SO EROSION IS ONE CONCERN. I'M ACTUALLY CONCERNED FOR THE CITY . I'M WONDERING OVER THAT BUILDING TIME 3 TO 5 YEARS WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN TO CAMPBELL? LIKE ALL THE RUNOFF AND EVERYTHING THAT'S GOING TO GO INTO THE POND, SO I'M REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT MAINTENANCE OF THE PARK. UM I ACTUALLY LOVE THE CONDOS ON THE RIGHT SIDE OR THE TOWN HOMES. I'M SORRY. I THINK THAT IT'S A BEAUTIFUL PRODUCT. I THINK IT'S A GREAT AREA. I'M REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER, THOUGH. IT'S TOO DENSE THE TRAFFIC AT THAT INTERSECTION NOW AGAIN, WE LIVED THERE. THERE ARE SIRENS AND ACCIDENTS PRETTY MUCH EVERY WEEKEND. IT'S A REALLY HARD INTERSECTION WITH THE HILL AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO HAVE MORE IN AND OUT. SO I'M REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT GENERALLY THE SAFETY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. INCREASED EROSION. IS THERE ANY WATER RETENTION PLANNING FOR THESE PROPERTIES TO THE CITY ENGINEERS ADDRESS THAT? WHERE'S THE WATER RUSH GOING TO GO? I'M ASSUMING THE RETENTION WALLS ARE GONNA HAVE PIPES COMING OUT IS GOING TO BE MORE WATER, AND I'M GUESSING IT'S GOING IN THE CREEK SOMEHOW, RIGHT FOR THAT SOUTHWEST CORNER, SO THAT'S MORE WATER UPSTREAM THAT'S GONNA ENDANGER THE CURVE WILL ASK ABOUT THAT. AND, YEAH, THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE THAT. AND I OUT OF TIME. OKAY, PERFECT. SO EROSION. THE LAST PART IS WILDLIFE. AND I DON'T EVEN KNOW HOW BUILDERS AND THE ZONING COMMISSION FEEL ABOUT THAT. I WAS LOVING THAT THAT WAS LIKE A COMMERCIAL. POTENTIAL THAT WE WOULD HAVE MAYBE A SMALL RESTAURANT WITH A BEAUTIFUL PATIO THAT WOULD OUTLOOK CAMPBELL LAKE AND SOMETHING LIKE THAT WOULD STILL ALLOW ALL THE GEESE THAT WINTER THERE TO COME IN AND NOT FLY INTO THINGS. IT WOULD HAVE LESS POPULATION. WE HAVE SCISSOR TALES THAT NEST IN

[01:50:05]

UNLESS UNLESS THAT IS THE CASE. UM HOWEVER, UNFORTUNATELY, WON'T BE ABLE TO ANSWER THE DETAILED QUESTIONS. BUT IF THE APPLICANTS ENGINE CIVIL ENGINEER IS HERE, IT LOOKS LIKE HE'S RIGHT THERE.

HE'S ABLE TO CONFIRM. UM YEAH, MY NAME IS MATT DUENWALD. 13 4 55 NO ROAD ON THE LIST HERE.

OKAY. ALRIGHT YES. SO THE POND OR LAKE WHATEVER YOU WANNA CALL THAT IS A DETENTION POND. IT'S MEANT TO RETAIN WATER. AND WHEN THIS SITE WAS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED THAT POND THAT AREA WAS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT FOR COMMERCIAL RUNOFF. SO THIS POND SO WE DON'T NEED TO DETAIN ON OUR SIDE. WE ARE BELOW THE PRE DEVELOPMENT FLOWS DOWN. TO HER POINT. THAT AREA, SHE SAYS, IS INUNDATED. YES SO THEY'RE FEMA HAS FLOODPLAIN ADJACENT TO THE SITE, SO THERE'S A BUFFER THAT YOU SEE AT THE FRONT OF THOSE HOMES. IT'S ABOUT 25 FT. WIDE THAT IS TO ALLOW FOR THE STORAGE OF THE WATER AND ALL THE STRUCTURES ARE TO AT LEAST TWO FT. ABOVE THAT FLOODPLAIN LIMIT.

BUT, YEAH, THE WHOLE AREA IS INUNDATED IN THE 100 YEAR. RIGHT EVENT. I WOULD AGREE. WE ANTICIPATED AND EXPECTED, UH, TO BE PERFECTLY TRANSPARENT. I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH THAT SITE BECAUSE IN OH, SIX I DESIGNED TO RESTAURANTS AND SOME OFFICE AND RETAIL FOR THAT CORNER, BUT SOMETHING CALLED THE CRASH OF OH, EIGHT KIND OF KILLED KILLED ALL THAT, SO WE'LL GO TO THE ONE POINT ON TRAFFIC. SO WE COMPLETED A T I A AND WE'VE GONE THROUGH IMPROVED OUT THAT OUR SITE GENERATES 90 TRIPS IN THE PM PEAK HOUR, WHICH IS ACTUALLY LESS THAN THE THRESHOLD FOR TEDIOUS. WE WORKED WITH STAFF TO GO THROUGH THAT ANALYSIS, BUT THIS LAND, USE SINGLE FAMILY OR MULTI FIT OR EXCUSE ME. TOWN HOME IS MUCH LESS INTENSE USE THAN, SAY, A RESTAURANT COMMERCIAL THAT GENERATES A LOT MORE TRIPS THAN A SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED. SO FROM A TRAFFIC STANDPOINT, AS AN ENGINEER IS PROBABLY THE BEST USE I COULD ASK FOR, UH, TRAFFIC CONGESTION ISSUES. ALRIGHTY, COMMISSIONER ROSES QUESTION YES, UH IF YOU'RE GOING EAST ON CAMPBELL ROAD. AND YOU SEE A BACKUP OF TRAFFIC BECAUSE OF THE LIGHT AT SHALLOW AND CAMPBELL WHY WOULDN'T YOU AS A DRIVER CUT THROUGH THAT ROAD AND GET DOWN TO SHILOH ROAD ALONG BASICALLY ALONG THE THREE STORIES, WE'RE GONNA PUT SPEED HUMPS IN THERE OR SOMETHING THAT'S SLOW TRAFFIC DOWN CONTROL TRAFFIC SOMEHOW BECAUSE I CAN SEE THAT DEVELOPING SO THEIR CAPACITY ISSUES RIGHT IN THE CITY HAS A PLAN FOR THE FULL BUILD OUT OF THAT ROAD AND TURN LANES IN THE INTERIM. YOU KNOW, I CAN WORK WITH ROMAN. AS FAR AS YOU KNOW, SOME SPEED REDUCTION THROUGH THERE. I'M NOT OPPOSED TO THAT AND GRENADIERS NOT AS WELL, PUTTING SPEED SPEED BUMPS AND THEIR SPEED HUMPS, BUT WE'D HAVE TO WORK WITH ENGINEERING STAFF TO SEE IF THEY'D BE ACCEPTABLE TO THEM. ALRIGHTY THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE ENGINEER? ALRIGHTY. THANK YOU. OKAY, UH, LET'S SEE. PETTY MORE. HELLO I LIVE AT 66 11 WILDLIFE TRAIL. MY HOUSE IS GOING TO BACK UP RIGHT TO THE DOG PARK. AND RIGHT BEHIND ME IS A GREEN BELT. THAT IS ONE REASON I BOUGHT MY HOME. IT'S A LUSCIOUS, IT'S GOT TREES. IT'S VERY PRIVATE. WE DON'T HAVE ANY PEOPLE RUNNING IN AND OUT THROUGH THERE. AND THERE'S REALLY NICE WILDLIFE. THERE'S RABBITS. WE HAVE A NICE COMMUNITY. I LIVE IN A TOWN HOME. I'M NOT OPPOSED TO TOWN HOMES. AND HE ALSO SAID THE VERY FIRST THING, HE SAID WAS THAT WAS A CONGESTED AREA. THE TRAFFIC GOING UP CAMPBELL BECAUSE I LIVE ON THE CORNER. CAMPBELL. AND I MEAN, MY HOUSE BREAKS UP TO CAMPBELL AS WELL THAT TRAFFIC IN THE AFTERNOONS IS BACKED UP FOR MILES. WHEN THEY ADD THIS MANY MORE HOMES IN THERE, WE'RE NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO GET THROUGH THERE. THAT'S A CONCERN. AND I'M CONCERNED FOR

[01:55:03]

DON INGRAM IT 65 34 TALLYHO. UME HAVE ALREADY PUBLISHED BASICALLY EVERYTHING I HAD ON MY MIND AND PARTICULARLY CHAIRMAN ROBERTS, I THINK YOU'RE SPOT ON AND I'M GONNA SUPPORT 100% ALL THE THINGS YOU TALKED ABOUT THERE. I THINK THAT SIDE IS A VERY UNIQUE PROPERTY, VERY UNIQUE SITE.

THERE'S A LOT THAT CAN BE DONE WITH IT, AND I JUST HOPE THAT THEY CAN THEY IN THE CITY CAN MAXIMIZE THE POTENTIAL OF THAT VERY UNIQUE. ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE OUTSIDE. TIME I JUST ALSO WANTED TO REITERATE WHAT EVERYBODY ELSE HAS BEEN CONCERNED ABOUT, AND THAT'S THE DRAINAGE. THE STORM WATER, YOU KNOW, I KNOW Y'ALL RUN YOUR MODELS ON, UH, STORM FLOW AND SO FORTH, AND THEY ALL YOU KNOW FIT . THE MODEL PASSED THE TEST AND SO FORTH, BUT REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE MODELS ARE SAYING THAT CREEK IS BEING DESTROYED OVER THERE. THE CITY SIDE OF THAT POND IS LOST. PROBABLY 30 FT OF EMBANKMENT THERE, AND THERE'S BEEN TONS OF SAND FROM THE RIVER RIVER SAND WASHED OFF INTO THE CREEK, AND I'M SURE IT'S BEING ACCUMULATED BACK ON YOUR PROPERTY IN THE PARK AND I SAW WHERE THERE WAS SOME CITY ORDINANCES NOW PUTTING THE OWNERS OF CLEANING UP ALL THAT SAND BACK ON THE HOMEOWNERS, AND THAT'S A CONCERN TO ME BECAUSE I OWN SOME PROPERTY THERE, AND I DON'T WANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A BUNCH OF SAYING THAT I DON'T KNOW WHERE IT'S COMING FROM. WINDING UP, YOU KNOW MY SHORE'S AND THEN I'M GOING TO BE ACCUSED OF, YOU KNOW, COME UP WITH A $50,000 CLEANUP BILL FOR SAND OUT OF THE CREEK. UM BUT YOU'RE LOSING A LOT OF LAND ON THE PARK SIDE THERE. ERODING AWAY. IT'S UM IT'S WASHING DOWNSTREAM, SO UM, THAT STORM WATER THAT POND CANNOT TAKE ANY MORE WATER. IT'S MAXED OUT. UM, I DO. I THINK THAT THIS IS A VERY. GOOD DESIGN . THAT'S PROBABLY THE BEST THAT CAN THEN HAPPENED WITH. THE POROSITY OF THE GROUND THERE AS OPPOSED TO A PARKING LOT. YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO GET MUCH BETTER THAN THIS. BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOME HIGH END EXECUTIVE LEVEL HOUSING SOMEWHERE AROUND HERE FOR THE PROFESSIONALS FOR THE DOCTORS FOR THE PROFESSORS AT THE SCHOOLS AND STUFF, THEY'RE JUST NOT ENOUGH HIGH LEVEL EXECUTIVE HOUSING INSIDE 1 92. MEET THE DEMAND. I FEEL I THINK THAT THEY COULD SELL SOME OF THAT KIND OF A PRODUCT. SO UM. BEYOND THAT, I WANT TO POINT OUT AND I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING YOU WERE SAYING ABOUT THE CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC.

THERE WE LIVE. YOU KNOW, WE'RE GONNA SEE THAT CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC. HMM. COME AND OFFER.

CAMPBELL ROAD AND. LIKE THEY SAY THAT CAMPBELL SHALLOW INTERSECTION BACKS ALL THE WAY BACK UP TO THE CHURCH IN THE AFTERNOONS. AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE CITY HAS PLANNED FOR.

CAPACITY THERE, BUT THAT INTERSECTION. PEOPLE ARE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO GET OUT ON THE CAMPBELL ROAD FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN THE AFTERNOON. THAT'S THAT'S A FACT. SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING DOWN. I HAVE NO MORE SPEAKERS LISTED. IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE KNOW DIDN'T YOU? WHICH IS TO ADDRESS THIS CASE? SEEING NONE OF THE APPLICANT WANTS TO COME BACK UP AND ADDRESS ANYTHING ANYBODY SAID YOU'RE WELCOME TO OR.

BUT IT WOULD JUST ADDRESSED TO DIFFERENT ITEMS. ONE IS THE POND AND SILT AND YOU KNOW IF WE'RE GONNA BE BUILDING OUT THERE FOR 3 TO 5 YEARS, I THINK THAT WAS A GOOD POINT. UM THE CITY WILL MANDATE US IN THE STATE WILL ALSO MANDATE US TO PUT UP EROSION, CONTROL FENCING AND DO OUR BEST TO KEEP ANY SILT FROM WASHING INTO THE POND. WE HAVE TO BE RESPECTFUL, KNOWING THAT IT'S AN AMENITY FOR THE FOR THE HOMEOWNERS AND FOR THE RESIDENTS OF GARLAND SO AND WE SEND SOMEBODY OUT ON A WEEKLY BASIS. THEY DO A NY INSPECTION AT EVERY ONE OF OUR COMMUNITIES, SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE TO DO, AND I THINK THAT'S DEFINITELY HEARD THAT THE OTHER POINT IS THE CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC. WE ARE DEFINITELY OPEN TO PUTTING IN SOME KIND OF SPEED BUMPS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE POSITION OF THE CITY'S TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT IS. WE DID A TRAFFIC

[02:00:05]

SO THIS IS GOING TO BE ENOUGH MID FOUR HUNDRED'S TO PROBABLY 600,000. INJURY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING DOWN. COMMISSIONERS WE HAVE NO MORE SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM. SO CHAIR OR ENTERTAIN A MOTION OR DISCUSSION. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ROSE SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. THIS IS TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ONLY. OKAY WE ARE IN DISCUSSIONS.

PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. WE'RE IN DISCUSSION. COMMISSIONER ROSC AND D I DIDN'T. TERESI AND THREE D MOTION TO APPROVE AND THE SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ALBAN ANY DISCUSSION. I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SUPPORT THIS MOTION. I HAVE TO LOOK AT THE WORST CASE SCENARIOS. AND WHAT IF YOU KNOW? AND I'M NOT LIKING WHAT I'M SEEING RIGHT NOW. THE DEVIATIONS AND THE DENSITY. THAT JUST ISN'T WORKING IN RESPONSE TO THE LAND. IF YOU ARE MITIGATED WITH DIFFERENT HEIGHTS. UH I WOULDN'T WANT TO MOVE THERE BECAUSE I'M GETTING OLDER. I DON'T WANT TO THREE STORY. IF THEY HAD A BILL OF THEIR IT MIGHT JUST WORK, BUT I CAN'T SUPPORT THIS AT THIS TIME COMMISSIONER ARE BEEN COMMISSIONED DALTON THANK YOU, MR CHAIR. UM I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS AND INPUT ON THE CHURCH INPUT ON THIS. UM BUT I LOOK AT THIS STRICTLY AS A YOU KNOW MORE IN THE LAND USE AS OPPOSED TO THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF WOULD I WANT TO LIVE THERE OR TO DESIGN PIECE AND FROM A LAND USE

[02:05:05]

SO I KNOW THAT THERE ARE PLANS FOR THAT. I WOULD I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO REACH OUT TO YOUR CITY COUNCIL MEMBER WHO IS VERY ACCESSIBLE, VERY ENGAGED, UM TO TALK ABOUT THESE KINDS OF CHANGES, THE THINGS YOU WANT TO SEE AND GET A PRESENTATION FROM THE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TO LONG TERM PLAN. THE VERY LONG TERM PLAN FOR SHILOH IS THAT IT WILL BE HAVE MORE CAPACITY WILL BE WIDER. UM I DON'T KNOW IF THAT GOES ALL THE WAY UP TO 6 35 OR NOT. I'M SORRY UP TO 1, 90 OR NOT, IT'S BEING WIDENED. FROM THE SOUTH UP TO THE NORTH. BUT, UM. SO I DON'T SEE IT AS CAUSING TRAFFIC PROBLEMS. UM YOU KNOW, THERE'S ALWAYS THIS, YOU KNOW WHAT ELSE COULD IT BE? BUT THE FACT OF MATTER IS, IT'S BEEN I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG IT'S BEEN VACANT FOR, YOU KNOW, BUT OBVIOUSLY SINCE 2006 AND BEFORE THAT, AND SO I THINK IF IT WAS GOING TO BECOME SOMETHING ELSE THAT WOULD HAVE, SO WE'RE LOOKING AT SOMETHING THAT IS PROBABLY DOES CONFORM WITH THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE THAT ALSO PROBABLY HAS THE LOWEST AMOUNT OF IMPACT. ON THE AREA ON THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS ON THE ON THE WILDLIFE AND EVERYTHING ELSE. YOU KNOW IF THIS WAS COMMERCIAL, I THINK YOU'D BE IT WOULD HAVE MUCH GREATER IMPACT BOTH OF THESE IF BOTH OF THESE SIDES GET DEVELOPED AS COMMERCIAL, AND I JUST DON'T SEE IT'S JUST NOT. YOU KNOW THAT THE CITY IS HISTORICALLY NOT BEEN IN THE BUSINESS OF BUYING UP LAND AND TURNING IT INTO PARKS. SO UM , FOR THAT REASON I INTEND TO SUPPORT THE MOTION. THANK YOU, MR CHAIR. THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONER, PARIS THEN COMMISSIONER JENKINS. THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN. I THOUGHT, UM, COMMISSIONER DALTON WAS NEXT WITH WITHDREW. OKAY DROPPED OFF . SO NO WORRIES. COUPLE OF THINGS. CHAIRMAN, YOU HAD LICIT A NUMBER OF CONCERNS AND WAS WONDERING HOW WILL THAT GET ADDRESS WITHIN WHAT WE'VE SEEN PRESENTED, SAID I WAS ONE QUESTION THAT I HAD WITH THAT I'LL PAUSE FOR THE ANSWER THERE. WELL, THAT GOES TO THE DEVIATIONS AND THE DETAILED PLAN WHERE I WAS GOING WITH TOOK AWAY THE ABILITY FOR US TO PLAY WITH DETAILED PLANS. UM. A LAND USE MAY BE APPROPRIATE, BUT IT COULD BE IMPLEMENTED TO WHERE IT IS INAPPROPRIATE TO, AND THEY'VE SHOWN US THREE STORY ALONG THE PERIMETERS AND THINGS SO THEY'VE SHOWN US WHERE IT CAN BE, TO MY OPINION, POORLY IMPLEMENTED, SO I HAVE TO LOOK AT THE GOOD AND THE BAD POTENTIALS. IN TERMS OF DEVIATIONS THAT HELPS INCREASE THE DENSITY WITH THE SHORT, SHORTER LOTS. SHORT OF DRIVEWAYS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. AND SO THOSE THOSE ARE DIRECT THINGS THAT WE CAN GOVERN THROUGH THE P D. WHAT HEIGHT STUFF GOES WHERE WE CANNOT MESS WITH DUE TO STATE. INPUT THEY WOULD HAVE TO OFFER IT UP IN THEIR DETAILED PLAN. THANK YOU FOR RESPONDING THERE. THAT WAS WHERE I WAS WANTING TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTOOD BECAUSE I AM LOOKING AT LAND USE. FOR MY DECISION, SEE A LOT OF DEVIATIONS REALLY WAY THROUGH WHAT THOSE ARE AND WHAT WE'VE HEARD EARLIER OF WHY THOSE DEVIATIONS ARE THERE AND THIS IS THE BEST USE OF LAND AND I UNDERSTAND AND I THINK IT WAS MENTIONED BY, UH COMMISSIONER AUBURN AROUND IS IT? THE BEST USE IN TERMS OF YOU KNOW OF COMMERCIAL WOULD BE BETTER EVERY TALE ETCETERA, AND THAT'S ANOTHER QUESTION THAT I HAVE, YOU KNOW. IS THIS THE BEST USE OF LAND? UH BASED ON WHAT WE'VE HEARD TODAY, SO YOU'VE ANSWERED

[02:10:06]

THEN WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING HERE SHALLOW AND, UH, AND CAMPBELL ROAD. TRAFFIC HAS INCREASED AT BUCKINGHAM AND SHILOH. BUT IT'S NOT INTOLERABLE. YOU JUST HAVE TO WAIT A LITTLE. YOU HAVE TO PLAN AHEAD TO GET THROUGH THERE. UM AND IT'S BEAUTIFUL AND THE TRAFFIC HAS NOT DESTROYED. THE ENVIRONMENT NOW? YES THERE'S NOT A CREEK OR A POND. IT WAS JUST ALL OPENED FLAT LAND, BASICALLY, BUT UH, IF THIS IS DEVELOPED AS RIVER SET HAS BEEN DEVELOPED. I THINK THIS IS GOING TO BE A SUCCESS FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. UM, YOU KNOW, GIVEN THAT THEY TAKE CARE OF THE DRAINAGE AND SO FORTH. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS. ALRIGHT, WE HAVE EMOTION. AND GET THIS RIGHT. A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CHANGE IN, UH YEAH, THAT'S ALMOST READING THE WRONG ONE. SORRY THEY'RE CHANGING. ZONING. UH, TWO FOR PD FOR TOWN HOMES AND THE DETAILED PLAN. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. SEEN THE MORE DISCUSSION. LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE.

WE ONLY HAVE FOUR VOTES SHOWN. CAN WE RESET THE VOTE? YES I'M WORKING ON THAT. WE'RE HAVING ISSUES RIGHT NOW. OKAY IF YOU CONTINUE HAVE ISSUES JUST LET ME KNOW AND WE'LL DO A SHOW OF HANDS. CAN WE PLEASE DO YOU SHOW HANDS ALREADY? ALL IN FAVOR.

COMMISSIONER ROSE AND COMMISSIONER AUBIN AND FAVOR ALL OPPOSED. COMMISSIONERS, DALTON.

UH PARIS, JENKINS, ROBERTS, WILLIAMS AND HARDENED OPPOSITION. OKAY THAT MOTION FAILS. WE ARE LOOKING FOR ANOTHER MOTION NOW. BECAUSE WE GOTTA PASS SOMETHING. DON'T EVERYBODY SPEAK UP AT ONCE? COMMISSIONER JENKINS. I GUESS I HAVE A QUESTION, ARE WE. WELL, LET'S LET'S DO IT LIKE THIS. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE JUST THE REQUEST TO REZONE.

THAT'S IT, NOT THE DETAILED PLAN. OKAY THAT PUTS US IN A BIND, AND THAT IF WE WERE APPROVED THE REQUEST TO REZONE THE DETAILED PLAN IS IN IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. AND WE MUST VOTE ON IT, OR IT IS APPROVED BY DEFAULT WITHIN 30 DAYS. AM I CORRECT ON THAT? TO PREVENT THEN THEN THAT THAT MOTION IS WITHDRAWN QUESTIONS. WHAT'S WRONG? YES SINCE THE STATE MESSED WITH HOW WE HANDLED DETAILED PLANS. IT'S A TECHNICAL ISSUE LIKE A PLAN. RIGHT NOW, IT IS NOT TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH THAT THE CORRESPONDING ZONING GO WITH IT. HMM. OKAY. OKAY.

QUESTION. COMMISSIONER ROSE. WE LEAVE IT AS IT IS. THE APPLICANT CAN GO TO THE NEGATIVE OF THE APPLICANTS RIGHT TO THE CITY COUNCIL REQUEST APPROVAL. WHAT. YEAH DEFINITELY. BUT WE HAVE TO APPROVE EMOTION FIRST. UH WHY? WE SAID NO FAILURE TO APPROVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR DOES NOT

[02:15:02]

ANSWERS. YES. GOOD BECAUSE I HATE LONG ANSWERS. OKAY ALRIGHTY . WE HAVE A MOTION TO DENY THE REQUEST. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? COMMITTEE COMMISSIONER ROSE. MY QUESTION IS OF OUR FELLOW COMMISSIONERS. WHY DO THEY? WHY ARE THEY AGAINST US? WHAT? WHAT? WHAT'S IN YOUR HEAD TO SAY, OH, THIS IS REALLY GOING TO BE TERRIBLE. WELL I THINK I THINK I'VE STAYED IN MY CASE ALREADY, AND I THINK SOME OF THEM PROBABLY ALONG THE SAME LINES OR SOMETHING. ITS IMPLEMENTATION IS NOT RESPONSE OF ENOUGH TO THE LAND. COMMISSIONER JENKINS. SO TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, ACTUALLY, THIS EVENING CAME HERE WITH THE INTENT TO APPROVE. BUT AFTER LISTENING TO THE CONCERNS OF THE COMMITTEE, AND LISTENING TO THE RESPONSE IS A SORT OF SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES HAVE BEEN SWAYED THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION. I THINK PART OF WHAT I WHAT I INTEND PART OF WHAT I SEE THIS THIS RESPONSIBILITY TO BE TO LISTEN TO THE CONCERNS OF THE COMMUNITY , AND THE COMMUNITY SPEAKS A CERTAIN SORT OF WAY. AND I HEAR THAT WE'VE GOT AN OPPORTUNITY IN THE FUTURE TO CONSIDER SHILOH TO LOOK DIFFERENTLY IN THE FUTURE. RIGHT NOW THE COMMUNITY IS SAYING, THIS IS HOW THEY'RE IMPACTED. THIS IS WHAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE. THIS IS WHAT THEIR CONCERNS ARE AND UNTIL THE DEVELOPER HAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE COMMUNITY'S CONCERNS DIRECTLY. I'M GOING TO SIDE WITH THEM. SO THAT'S THAT'S WHERE I'M I'M I AM MAN ON THAT. ALRIGHTY ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ITEM DOESN'T JOB. COMMISSIONER ART. WELL THANKS. PUTTING MY TWO CENTS ON IT IS I AM AND IN OPPOSITION TO THIS PROJECT, UM, THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THE WESTERN SIDE AS WHAT HAS GIVEN ME THE MOST HEARTBURN ON IT. IT'S NOT THE EASTERN SIDE. IT IS LIKE TWO SEPARATE PROJECTS ALL AND ONE OF THE AMENITIES BEING SPLIT THE. AND I WANT TO HAVE SOMETHING THAT IS AS RESPECTFUL TO THE LAND TO THE PARK AS POSSIBLE. I THINK CHAIRMAN YOU SAID IT BEST.

THIS SEEMS LIKE IT IS SOMETHING THAT THAT THE ROW OF HOUSES THAT IS GOING TO BE ALONG THAT SIDE, SO IT'S IT REALLY IT'S BOTHERING ME, SO I DON'T THINK THAT THIS IS THE HIGHEST BEST USE THAT WE CAN DO WITH THIS. I THINK THEY CAN DO BETTER. AND SINCE OUR ONLY RECOURSE IS A DENIAL IN TOTAL, THAT'S REALLY ALL THAT WE HAVE THAT WE CAN DO. ALREADY. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION. OKAY THE MOTION IS TO DENY. WE CLARIFY THE MOTION, PLEASE. OKAY THE MOTION IS TO DENY THE ZONING AND TO DENY THE DETAILED PLAN FOR 2200 AND 23. OH, TWO, WEST CAMPBELL.

ALREADY WE'RE WORKING. PASSES SIX TO DO WITH COMMISSIONERS ARE BEEN AND ROSE AND OPPOSITION

[Items 3E - 3G]

[02:20:20]

2015. WHAT'S THE TERM I'M LOOKING FOR, WILL, UH, STANDARD . THEY WERE OUT OF COMPLIANCE.

WE BROUGHT THEM UP TO COMPLIANCE. GM, IT IS A FAMILY OWNED COMPANY WERE PRIVATELY HELD. WE'VE BEEN IN THE INDUSTRY FOR YOU KNOW, SINCE 1976. ULTIMATELY I HAVEN'T BEEN THERE QUITE SINCE 1976. WE, UH. YOU REALLY JUST WANT TO BRING A STATE OF THE ART RECYCLING FACILITY TO THE CITY OF GARLAND? UM WE'VE GOT SOME CORE VALUES. I CAN GO OVER AND I'M REALLY, YOU KNOW, PROUD OF THESE. WE CAME UP FROM THEM AS A GROUP, GRATITUDE, INTEGRITY, PASSION, SUSTAINABILITY AND SAFETY. THAT'S HOW WE RUN OUR BUSINESS AND HOW WE FIND OUR STAFF. AND OUR OUTREACH TO THE COMMUNITY. MM WILL BE FIVE YEARS OLD IN OCTOBER OF 2022. WE STARTED WITH NINE EMPLOYEES. TODAY WE HAVE OVER 100, THE JOBS AND THE DFW METROPLEX AND WE RECYCLE ROUGHLY 5000 TONS OF METAL EVERY MONTH, BRINGING THAT AWAY FROM THE LANDFILLS AND GETTING IT BACK INTO A CIRCULAR ECONOMY, WHICH WAS REALLY PROUD OF UM, AND ALL KIND OF BURNED THROUGH SOME OF THESE QUICKLY, PLEASE STOP ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. REMEMBER THIS. THIS PICTURE HERE IF YOU CAN. IT DOESN'T LOOK TOO PRETTY. THIS WAS TAKEN IN THE MIDDLE OF 2020. SO WE I'M SORRY. MIDDLE EARLY 2021. WE'VE MADE SOME SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENTS SINCE THIS BEFORE GEOMETRIC CAME INVOLVED WITH THE PROPERTY, MR OTT, THIS IS EFFECTIVELY WHAT YOU CAN FIND ON GOOGLE EARTH.

YOU CAN SEE, UM YOU KNOW, ON THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY THERE IS, YOU KNOW, A LACK OF OFFENSE LINE. THERE ARE SOME TREES THERE. SCRAP PILED UP. EVERYWHERE THERE IS TRAILERS ACTING AS A FENCE DOWN IN THE SOUTH CORNER. WITH VISIBILITY TO THE DART RAIL. THERE WAS AGAIN TRAILERS ALSO VISIBLE FROM THE DART RAIL. UM, YOU KNOW, REALLY? MISMANAGED FACILITY. THERE IS A BIG PILE OF SCRAP RIGHT HERE IN FRONT OF THE IN FRONT OF A WAREHOUSE COULDN'T EVEN GET TO THE FOUR DOCKS ARE THERE TODAY THIS NORTH ENTRANCE WAS TOTALLY UNDEVELOPED. UM WHAT WAS NOT BEING USED. THIS WAS THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED THE END OF 2019. AND

[02:25:03]

[02:30:03]

IT'S GOING TO SHRED EVERYTHING IN THAT AREA. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU HAD A SCRAPYARD OR BUILDING. EVERYTHING IS COMING DOWN. EVERYTHING'S GETTING MOVED AROUND. BUT OUR STRATEGY IS NOT TO SPECULATE TO YOUR POINT ABOUT INVENTORY. WE TURN INVENTORY OVER. UM AND THAT'S WHAT I WAS HOPING TO SHOW AND SOME OF THE SOME OF THE SLIDES IS, YOU KNOW, PRIOR TO US GETTING THERE THERE WAS MONSTROUS PILES ALL AROUND THE PROPERTY AND OVER TIME WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO REDUCE THAT TO A MORE MANAGEABLE LEVEL, AND THAT WILL CONTINUE TO BE THE CASE. BURNING QUESTIONS. I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU FOR PROVING THAT SIDE OUT THERE AND MAKING IT THE DISNEYLAND METAL RECYCLING DONE, BUT I APPRECIATE YOU THINK SO WELL IN HIS STAFF FOR VERY HELPFUL AND THEY'RE NOT IT'S NOT EASY ON US. GOOD. THANK YOU. ALRIGHTY UH, LET ME SEE IF THERE'S ANYBODY ELSE OR HIDING WHO WISHES TO YOUR SISTER DOWN. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS OF YOU. ANYBODY ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM? BECAUSE I DON'T THINK I HAVE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS. I DON'T SEE NONE COMMISSIONERS. MR CHAIR. COMMISSIONER WILL COMMISSION WILLIAMS YOU CHIMED IN. THANK YOU, MR CHAIRMAN. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE ALL THREE REQUEST SECOND. OKAY WHERE DID I HEAR THE SECOND? COME FROM, COMMISSIONER ROSE, OKAY. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS AND BIKE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT. I THOUGHT I COULD PLEASE, OKAY. WELL WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. I'LL READ THE DEAL AND THEN WE'LL HAVE COMMENTS ALREADY, UH, WE HAVE A MOTION TO REQUEST APPROVAL AMENDMENT TWO P D 19-32 TO APPROVE A SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS AND A PLAN. AND YES, SIR. FOLLOW UP. THANK YOU, MR CHAIRMAN. I JUST WANTED TO TELL THE APPLICANT THAT WE ALL GET EXCITED ABOUT PEOPLE COMING IN AND IMPROVING THAT AN EXISTING PROPERTY AND, UH, IT SOUNDS BY YOUR PRESENTATION THAT IT'S A TOP NOTCH. SITUATION OVER THERE , AND THAT'S IN MY DISTRICT AND WE NEED ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE CAN GET ON PROPERTY LIKE THIS. IT'S TO ME. THAT PLACE WAS RUN DOWN BEFORE Y'ALL TOOK OVER AND STUFF. AND SO I APPRECIATE YOU TAKING THE TIME AND THE EFFORT TO IMPROVE THAT PROPERTY, SO IT'S PRESENTABLE TO THE SETTING. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS. MM E G AND F. IT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

[02:35:05]

[3h. Consideration of the application of Kehinde Omo-Iyamu, requesting approval of a Change in Zoning from Neighborhood Office (NO) District to Community Retail (CR) District. This property is located at 2940 Broadway Boulevard and 2955 Dairy Road. (District 5) (File Z 22-45 – Zoning)]

SIMPLE. I JUST WANT. THE TO REZONE A BUILDING FROM AIRBALLED OFFICE. TO COMMUNITY RETAIL. SO THIS WORKED ME TO MOVE MY OWN SALONE IN THEIR BUSINESS. SO I CAN MOVE FROM DALLAS TO GARLAND.

SIMPLE THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, UM , BEFORE SOMEBODY ELSE CAN I GET YOU TO STATE YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE. UH MY ADDRESS WANT TO 613? NATALIE DRIVING BOSS SPRINGS, TEXAS. ALRIGHTY. VERY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING DOWN. IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THIS CASE? SEEING NONE. COMMISSIONERS. COMMISSIONER JENKINS. THIS ITEM IS ONE VITAMINS. I'M SORRY I MISSED UNIQUE YOU, COMMISSIONER ROBERT COMMISSIONER ROBIN SECOND TRUCK . I INTO ACUTE IF WE'RE NOT GONNA LOOK AT A I MISS IT FROM TIME TO TIME. SORRY ABOUT THAT. WE HAVE MOTION BY COMMISSIONER JENKINS. WHERE WAS THE SECOND FROM? COMMISSION IN SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS. TO APPROVE THIS APPLICATION. I N J.

YES. NO JUST ONE ITEM H. IT'S JUST ITEM H. IT'S THE APPLICATION CHANGING ZONING. AND THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR BUSINESS HERE, SIR. ALREADY THE NEXT ITEM IS A

[Items 3I & 3J]

THANK YOU FOR HAVING US BACK. WE WERE HERE ABOUT A MONTH AND A HALF AGO ON ANOTHER MATTER, AND WE'RE HAPPY TO BE BACK AND FAMILIAR. HAPPY TO BE HERE AS WELL. AS, UM, YOU KNOW, ADDING ANOTHER TENANT TO THE DALLAS FOOD CENTER. UM THIS IS FOR A TENANT IMPROVEMENT FOR 26 10 MCCREE. WE CALL IT BUILDING BE THERE ACTUALLY. EVENTUALLY GONNA BE THREE BUILDINGS OUT THERE. A B AND C, UH, SALAD AND GO WILL BE DOING A TENANT IMPROVEMENT AT THIS FACILITY SO THAT THEY CAN BRING IN VEGETABLES, WASH. MAKE SOME LEMONADE TO DO SOME DIFFERENT THINGS TO SUPPORT.

THEY HAVE A DRIVE. THRU ONLY FORMAT RESTAURANTS THAT ARE POPPING UP ALL OVER. WE HAVE A COUPLE OF REPRESENTATIVES HERE FROM SALAD AND GO. THAT COULD PROBABLY TELL YOU ALL ABOUT WHAT THEY DO. UM BUT THIS WILL BE A NICE FACILITY THAT THERE WILL BE DOING SOME FLIGHT FRUIT PROCESSING THERE. IT'S NOT LIKE A MEAT CUTTING PLANT OR KILL PLANT OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

IT'LL BE WASHING VEGETABLES, YOU KNOW, MAKING SOME SALADS. UH AND IT WILL ALSO, UM YOU KNOW, ANOTHER NICE THING ABOUT THIS IS GOING TO EMPLOY OVER 200 PEOPLE. THERE WILL BE THREE SHIFTS.

THERE WILL BE TWO PRODUCTION AND CLEANING SHIFT, I BELIEVE AS WELL AS SUPPORTING THE TRUCK DRIVING COMMUNITY, SO THERE'S GOING TO BE A GREAT OPERATION HERE. UM IF YOU'VE GOT ANY QUESTIONS ON THE DETAILS OF THE FACILITY WE DON'T ANTICIPATE CREATING ANY VOTERS OR ANYTHING, YOU KNOW, NOXIOUS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IT'S JUST GOING TO BE A NICE SELF CONTAINED, UM AND IT'S GOING TO BE A GREAT ADDITION TO THE DALLAS FOOD CENTER AND SO ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. I NEED YOUR ADDRESS, SIR. I'M SORRY, AMERICA COMER. 2 48 CEDARHURST DRIVE.

[02:40:04]

[4a. Consider amending Section 4.24, “Multifamily Developments,” of Chapter 4, “Site Development,” the Land Use Matrix, and Table 7-1, “Downtown District Land use Matrix” of chapter 7 of the Garland Development Code; and amending Table 2-4 of Section 2.34 and Section 2.39 of Chapter 2, “Zoning Regulations,” and the Chapter 2 Land Use Matrix, of the Garland Development Code, removing general covered parking requirements for multi-family developments and creating a Multi-Family-0 [MF-0] District allowing “horizontal multi-family” developments. ]

THE SECOND PART OF IT IS THERE IS A NEW FORM OF MULTI FAMILY CALLED HORIZONTAL MULTI FAMILY, WHICH. TYPICALLY INCLUDES SMALL , SINGLE FAMILY STYLE HOMES, POSSIBLY DUPLEXES. INSTEAD OF YOUR TYPICAL APARTMENT STRUCTURE. AND ON THAT WE WOULD HAVE THOSE IN GENERAL. GOVERNED BY SOME MULTI FAMILY REQUIREMENTS, BUT IN OTHER AREAS GOVERNED BY SINGLE FAMILY REQUIREMENTS. INSTEAD OF GOING INTO ALL THE NITTY GRITTY ABOUT THAT WHICH WE DID IN OUR PRE MEETING WE ALL HAD SOME INPUT, WHICH I THINK STAFF WILL TRANSMIT TO THE COUNCIL. SO.

UNLESS THERE IS SOME DISCUSSION . IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO MAKE A MOTION TO DO SO AND INCLUDE OUR COMMENTS FROM THE PRE DEVELOPMENT MEETING, WE COULD PROBABLY COVER IT ALL THAT WAY.

JUST COMMISSIONER PARIS YOU LIVE HERE? GO AHEAD. NO THAT WAS FROM OKAY. YEAH JUST PUNCHING AND TALK. SOMEBODY MR CHAIR COMMISSION. DALTON GOT IN. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A BOAT. DON'T DO WE HAVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS. OKAY WELL, IT'S IT KIND OF GOES WITHOUT SAYING THAT. I DON'T THINK THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF JUMP ON ME TOO BAD NOT I WANT TO MAKE A MOTION. WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND FORWARD WITH OUR RECOMMENDATION, AS NOTED TO CITY COUNCIL. THE. MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES, TOO. THE. GARDEN DEVELOPMENT CODE. ADAMS FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION, OKAY MOTION BY COMMISSION, DALTON'S SECOND BACK, COMMISSIONER ROBINY COUNCIL WITH THEIR COMMENTS.

PLEASE VOTE. TWO PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ALREADY THE LAST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS NOW

[4b. Election of Officers]

[02:45:02]

THAT PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. I AGAIN I DO MY BEST. AND I APPRECIATE YOU ALL SUPPORT. AND I CAN'T DO ANY OF THIS WITH THAT. ANY OF YOU AND THAT INCLUDES EVERYBODY ON STAFF TO NONE OF THIS HAPPENS WITH THAT STAFF. NONE OF THIS HAPPENS WITHOUT ANY OF YOU. YOU ALL HAVE YOUR UNIQUE INPUTS, WHICH I TRULY VALUE AND I THANK YOU. THAT WAS THE LAST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA. SO INTERJECT REAL QUICK. YES CONGRATULATIONS. THANK YOU. YOU NOTICE HOW THE LAWYERS ALWAYS HAVE THE LAST SAY WE NEED TO MAKE A CLARIFICATION ON NUMBER FOUR, A. O NUMBER 48 CLARIFY. I BELIEVE THE MOTION WAS TO PASS IT ALONG. WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT MR GARIN WAS GOING TO MAKE. WE JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT PASSING ALONG MEANS WE'RE APPROVING IT WITH THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE STRESS IS GOING TO MAKE. I THINK WE ALL UNDERSTOOD THAT WAS THE CASE RECOMMENDATION ON VOTING FOR OUR OFFICERS. IT WAS FOUR WELL BEFORE WE GET TOO FAR. GOD THERE WAS THE LAST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA. SO OUR UNTIL OUR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 26TH WE ARE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.