Oct 11, 2022 City Council

[Call to Order]

[00:01:35]

WE ASK GOD TO REMIND US BECAUSE WE ALL FORGET FROM TIME TO TIME, ESPECIALLY IN THE NOISY NOUS OF WHAT PASSES FOR POLITICAL DEBATE TODAY. AND WE'RE NOT ALWAYS AT OUR BEST. REMIND US NO MATTER WHERE WE LIVE. EVERYONE IS OUR NEIGHBOR. SIBLINGS. AND THAT THROUGHOUT THE AGES, PROFITS OF CALLED THE LEADERS OF PEOPLE TO RESPECT AND PROTECT THE LEADERS OF THESE AMONG US OUR CHILDREN.

THE ELDERLY. THE POOR. THOSE WHO ARE HUNGRY. THOSE WHO HAVE NO HOMES. THOSE WHO ARE ILL IN BODY, MIND AND SPIRIT. THE STRANGERS, EVEN THE IMMIGRANTS THAT ARE MISSED. BOWLES WHO LIVE ON THE MARGINS AND THOSE WHO GO ALONG. THOSE WHO HAVE FORGOTTENS WISDOM AND COURAGE TO KNOW. AND DO WHAT IS RIGHT AND GOOD AND TRUE. MAY WE SPEAK OUT WHEN IT'S TIME TO SPEAK OUT AND LISTEN PATIENTLY AND RESPECTIVELY, WHEN IT'S TIME TO LISTEN. MAY WE ALWAYS BE GUIDED BY THE SPIRIT OF COMMUNITY. BY THE SPIRIT OF JUSTICE AND BY THE SPIRIT OF LOVE. THIS. WE PRAY ALL. OUR SECRET AND HOLINESS. AND ALL THAT WE HOLD GOOD AND RIGHT AND TRUE. MAY IT BE SO FATHER IN THE PRECIOUS NAME OF JESUS. WE PRAY ALL OF GOD'S CHILDREN SAY IT TOGETHER. AMEN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE PLAN. OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. DEGREE OF PUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS.

WHAT NATION ON THE GUY. INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

[Mayoral Proclamations, Recognitions, and Announcements]

[00:05:06]

I THINK THEY SAY IN THE ACTING WORLD NEVER WORKED WITH KIDS AND DOGS BECAUSE THEY'LL ALWAYS UPSTAGE YOU. I THINK THAT'S I THINK THAT IS ABSOLUTELY 100% TRUE. ALRIGHT BEFORE WE GET STARTED. I JUST WANT EVERYBODY NO COUNCIL MEMBER. WILLIAMS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO JOIN US THIS EVENING. BUT HE DID HAVE AN ANNOUNCEMENT THAT HE WANTED ME TO MAKE ON TUESDAY. EXCUSE ME THURSDAY, OCTOBER 20TH. HE IS SCHEDULED TO HAVE A DISTRICT FOR TOWN HALL MEETING. THIS WILL BE AT 6 30 AT AUDUBON REC CENTER. OVER ON OATS, AND THE TOPICS WILL BE UTILITY UPDATES FROM GARLAND POWER AND LIGHT AND ALSO GARLAND WATER UTILITIES. SO THURSDAY, OCTOBER 20TH 6 30 AUTOBAHN REC CENTER DISTRICT FOUR TOWN HALL. ALL RIGHT. WE WILL. I GUESS WE SHOULD GO AHEAD AND HAVE A MEETING. YOU KNOW THE KIDS AND THE DOGS OUT. THEY'VE ALL CONGREGATED IN THE LOBBY,

[CONSENT AGENDA]

COUNCILORS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW EACH OF THESE ITEMS AT A PREVIOUS WORK SESSION AND APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AUTHORIZES THE CITY MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT EACH ITEM. I WILL NOW SEE AGENDA AND PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR THE COUNCIL TO REQUEST AN ITEM BE REMOVED AND CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. CURRENTLY I DO NOT HAVE ANY REQUEST. LET ME SO LET ME READ THE AGENDA. ITEM ONE. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 20TH 2022 REGULAR MEETING. ITEM TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING BIDS ITEM TO A BATTERY BACKUP UNITS. ADAM TO BE WATER MAINS REPLACEMENT. ITEM. TWO C. AMS SUPPLIES AND MEDICATIONS ITEM TWO D G. P AND L ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTING. ITEM TWO E G P AND L

[00:10:08]

APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION. MADAM SECRETARY. IF YOU COMPARE THE VOTE FORCE, PLEASE. AND COUNCIL. AND DISPLAY THE VOTE, PLEASE. AND THAT ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY AND AGAIN. WE ARE EIGHT TONIGHT. NEXT ON OUR AGENDA IS ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. MADAM SECRETARY. COULD YOU GO OVER THE SPEAKER? REGULATIONS FOR US, PLEASE? YES, SIR. THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK IS GIVEN TO PROVIDE TESTIMONY RATHER THAN TO QUESTION THE CITY COUNCIL OR STAFF, THE CHAIRMAN, COLLEAGUES SPEAKER OUT OF ORDER IF THE SPEAKER PRESENTS QUESTIONS OR REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION THAT WILL UNDULY DELAY THE TRANSACTION OF BUSINESS AT THIS MEETING. SPEAKER SHALL BE ALLOWED TO SPEAK ON A FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED BASIS SPEAK BASIS AS DETERMINED BY THE ORDER IN WHICH THE CITY SECRETARY RECEIVES THE SPEAKERS, INFORMATION. APPLICANTS ARE ALLOWED 10 MINUTES FOR PRESENTATIONS AND ALL OTHER SPEAKERS WILL BE ALLOWED THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. WHEN THE PODIUM BUZZER SOUNDS, THE SPEAKER MUST END THEIR COMMENTS. VERY GOOD, MR GARIN. YES, SIR. MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

GOOD EVENING. THIS IS A THIS IS KZ 22 DASH. SORRY I SHOULD PROBABLY YEAH, YOU WERE WAITING

[Items 8A & 8B]

[00:15:04]

I'LL GO OVER THOSE CHANGES HERE IN A FEW SLIDES AS WELL. THE APPLICANT, OF COURSE, BUT BUT THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN AND SHE CAMPBELL ROAD RUNNING HERE. MORE SHALLOW ROAD RUNNING HERE. AGAIN. THESE ARE TOWNHOUSES THAT ARE ON INDIVIDUALLY PLANTED LOTS. SO SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED AND DEVELOPMENT IS HOW THE GARLAND DEVELOPMENT CODED CLASSIFIES THESE THERE'S OPEN SPACE AND AMENITY AREAS, UM, DISPERSED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING TWO DOG PARKS, ONE ON THIS SIDE SHOWN HERE IF YOU CAN SEE MY CURSOR AND ONE SHOWN HERE AN ADDITIONAL AMENITY AREA HERE, UM, AND YOU'LL NOTICE SOME OF THE TOWNHOUSE. LOTS. UM FRONT ONTO SOME GREEN OPEN SPACES AND OUR THAN ALI LOADED AS FAR AS THE GARAGES GO, WE'VE SEEN THIS CONCEPT BEFORE WITH THE RIVER SET NEIGHBORHOOD AS WELL AS HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE THE TOWNHOUSES OR IN SOME CASES , SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS. THEY OPEN ONTO AN OPEN COMMON GREEN SPACE, BUT THE GARAGES ARE TUCKED IN THE BACK. AND ALI LOADED. AND THE AMENITIES PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT INCLUDE A CLUBHOUSE SWIMMING POOL, FITNESS CENTER AND AGAIN TO DOG PARKS, AND ALL RESIDENTS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE TRACKS WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THE AMENITIES. AND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT MEETS THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GDC ALSO POINT YOU TO THE THERE'S A TRAIL CONNECTION HERE THAT AS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT, THAT ALIGNMENT WILL BE OR BE EXCUSE ME, REVIEWED FURTHER BY THE PARKS AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW , BUT THEY ARE PROPOSING AN EIGHT FT TRAIL CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING SPRING CREEK HARRIS TRAIL. SHOWING JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THIS WESTERN TRACKED. THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS. AND IT'S KIND OF COMBINATION OF FRONT ENTRY AND REAR ENTRY AND AGAIN AS I MENTIONED KIND OF AMUSED CONCEPT WHERE SOME OF THE HOUSES WILL FRONT ONTO SOME GREEN OPEN SPACE, INCLUDING ACTUALLY THE KIND OF JUMP BACK THE. CITY PARK AREA THAT THESE WILL KIND OF OVERLOOK AND THE GARAGES WILL BE ALONG THE STREET EDGE. SAME SITUATION OVER HERE TO THE EAST.

UM THERE'S A WELL TREED AREA, WHICH, FOR THE MOST PART WILL REMAIN. ALL TREES WILL BE PRESERVED THAT ARE IN THE FLOODPLAIN SHOWN THERE. AND JUST BUILDING ELEVATIONS. AND HERE'S THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR THE CLUBHOUSE. SO THERE ARE SOME DEVIATIONS THROUGH THE PD PROCESS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT THIS EVENING. I'LL JUST KIND OF START FROM THE TOP

[00:20:02]

THE GDC REQUIRES A MINIMUM, THE DRIVEWAY LENGTH OF 20 FT. THAT'S FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE GARAGE FACE. THE APPLICANT ADHERES TO THE 20 FT DRIVEWAY DEBT FOR ALL STREET FACING GARAGES, BUT IN SOME OF THE LOTS THERE WOULD BE JUST A FIVE FT DEPTH OF DRIVEWAY FOR THE TOWNHOUSES. UM FACING ALLEYS. EXCUSE ME, THE GARAGES FACING ALLEYS EXCEPT FOR LOTS FACING CAMPBELL ROAD, SHILOH ROAD IN THE FLOODPLAIN ON THE EAST, SO THE AFRICAN CONTENDS THAT THIS IS A DESIGN USED IN THE RIVER SET NEIGHBORHOOD. THEY HAVE SOME PHOTOGRAPHS TO KIND OF RUN THROUGH YOU SHOW YOU WHAT THAT CONCEPT LOOKS LIKE AND KIND OF HOW IT'S FUNCTIONED. IT'S ALSO IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE O A WILL HAVE REQUIREMENTS ADDRESSING RESIDENT PARKING. SO FOR EXAMPLE, THOSE WHO HAVE THE SHORTENED DRIVEWAY WILL BE REQUIRED TO USE THE GARAGE FOR ACTUAL VEHICLE PARKING. UM SO TO KIND OF MITIGATE FOR THAT POTENTIAL CONCERN, AND IN ADDITION TO THAT, SINCE THE PLAN COMMISSION MEETING, THE APPLICANT HAS ADDED SOME ADDITIONAL GUEST PARKING AREAS AND HAVOC HAS EXCEEDED THE GCS MINIMUM FOR GUEST PARKING THROUGHOUT THE SITE. STATS. RECOMMENDATION OF THE REQUEST IS APPROVAL. THIS IS OF THE CHANGE IN ZONING TO ALLOW FOR THE TOWNHOUSES AS WELL AS THE DETAILED PLAN, UM, PLAIN COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 12TH RECOMMENDED DENIAL THAT WAS A 6 TO 2 VOTE. THERE WERE SOME CONCERNS RAISED DURING THE HEARING ABOUT THE ABOUT THE REQUEST. BUT IN THE NEXT SLIDE HERE, I'LL GO THROUGH THE WHAT THE APPLICANT HAS RESUBMITTED SINCE THE PLAN COMMISSION HEARING IT IS PRESENTED BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IN YOUR AGENDA PACKET. I'M SURE THE APPLICANT WILL WALK THROUGH THESE WITH YOU AS WELL. BUT I'LL I'LL, UM KIND OF RUN THROUGH THESE REAL QUICKLY. THE TWO STARTING FROM THE TOP, THE AMENITY CENTER WAS RELOCATED TO A MORE CENTRALIZED LOCATION ON THE WESTERN TRACK. FOR BETTER LATE VIEW, UM, KIND OF ILLUSTRATE THAT THE PREVIOUS PROPOSAL THAT THIS IS NEW THAT THE, UM, INTERVIEW CENTER WAS SHOWN MORE LIKE OVER HERE VERY CLOSE TO SHILOH ROAD, SO THEY MOVED IT OVER TO MORE CENTRAL LOCATION AND HAS MORE BETTER ACCESS TO THE SUM OF THE GUEST PARKING. EXCUSE ME. AND NUMBER TWO, THEY EXPANDED THE PARKING IN THE CENTER OF THE WESTERN TRACK BY ADDING THREE ADDITIONAL HEAD AND PARKING SPACES ACROSS FROM THE AMENITY CENTER. WE JUST LOOKED AT THE APPLICANT EXPANDED PARKING ON THE EASTERN TRACK BY ADDING SIX ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES TO HELP ACCOMMODATE VISITOR PARKING. A DOG PARK WAS ADDED TO THE WESTERN TRACKED THE DOG PARK. I SHOWED HERE WAS PREVIOUSLY NOT IDENTIFIED AS A BUNK DOG PARK. I BELIEVE IT WAS JUST KIND OF GENERAL OPEN GREEN SPACE. BUT THERE WAS SOME CONCERN ABOUT ONLY HAVING HAVING A DOG PARK ON THE EASTERN TRACKED AND NOT THE WESTERN TRACKED. UM SO THAT'S BEING PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT. UM THE TOWNHOUSES ON THE WESTERN TRACK ARE NOW RESTRICTED TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF TWO STORIES. UM ONE OR TWO OF THE PLAN.

COMMISSIONERS HAD RAISED CONCERN ABOUT THE THREE STORY OR POTENTIAL THREE STORY HEIGHT OF

[00:25:04]

AND GEORGE BALDWIN. IS THAT. IS THERE ANY PARTICULAR ORDER, WOULD YOU? OKAY? GENTLEMEN, IF YOU CAN COME FORWARD AND. AND YOU ARE THE APPLICANT. YES. HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. I AM ANTHONY NATALI. 73 12 OAK BLUFF DRIVE IN DALLAS, TEXAS. WE'RE GOING TO GIVE A LITTLE PRESENTATION. TRY TO GET THROUGH THIS QUICKLY. UM SO JUST WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHO WE ARE.

AND HOW DID WE ARRIVE? AT THIS POINT? A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T KNOW OUR COMPANY. GRENADIER HOMES. UH WE STARTED ABOUT 31 YEARS AGO. IT'S MY BUSINESS PARTNER AND I WE'VE KNOWN EACH OTHER SINCE WE WERE FIVE YEARS OLD. SO WE GO WAY BACK AND KIND OF THAT'S THE FOUNDATION OF OUR BUSINESS. UM IT IS A PRIVATE COMPANY JUST OWNED BY THE TWO OF US. AND LAST YEAR JUST TO KIND OF GET AN IDEA. WE STARTED ABOUT 300 TOWN HOMES. WE FOCUS PRIMARILY ON TOWN HOMES. WE DO HAVE THE LONGEST HISTORY. WE BELIEVE IN THE CITY. WE STARTED DOWN IN THE ST THOMAS AREA IN 1993. SO THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE DO AND THAT WE FOCUS ON. UM WE HAVE DONE MANY OTHER DIFFERENT TYPES OF PRODUCTS. EVEN ST THOMAS AREA. AND IN THE DEEP ELLUM AREA. WE'VE DONE SOME URBAN MID RISE RESIDENCES. WE'VE DONE SOME CUSTOM LAKE HOMES, PATIO HOME, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES , VILLAS AND TOWN HOMES. BUT ABOUT FIVE YEARS AGO WE DECIDED THAT WHAT WE DID BEST WAS TOWN HOMES, AND THAT'S WHAT WE WANTED TO FOCUS ON. SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE HERE TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT THIS EVENING. AND THE PRODUCT THAT WE'RE, UM, WE'RE PLANNING TO DO ON THIS SITE. WE HAD PRESENTED IT. WE'RE BUILDING IT IN ANOTHER COMMUNITY AND PROSPER AND IT WON THE AWARD FOR BEST ARCHITECTURE AT THE TEXAS STAR AWARDS. SO I'M JUST GOING TO KIND OF MOVE THROUGH HERE AND JUST SHOW YOU SOME OF THE PRODUCTS. I TALKED ABOUT THE VARIATION OF WHAT WE'VE BUILT IN THE COMPANY. UP IN THE TOP LEFT HAND CORNER SOME HOMES ON CEDAR CREEK LAKE. TWO STORY TOWN HOMES ON THE TOP RIGHT CORNER. UM WITH THAT WE DID IN MCKINNEY. BOTTOM RIGHT CORNER OR SOME TOWN HOMES THAT WERE BUILT IN FAIRVIEW, TWO STORIES AND THEN THE PRODUCT THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS EVENING AND MORE CONTEMPORARY URBAN STYLE WE FELT FOR THIS SITE IS VERY URBAN SITE, SOMETHING MUCH MORE CONTEMPORARY . THAT'S IN THE BOTTOM LEFT HAND CORNER. ONE OF THE THEMES THAT YOU'LL SEE WITH ALL THOSE PICTURES IS OUR FOCUS ON LANDSCAPING. UM I'M GOING TO KIND OF MOVE THROUGH HERE. THESE ARE THE TWO SITES. I KNOW. MR GARIN TALKED ABOUT WHAT'S AROUND US FROM MULTI FAMILY APARTMENTS OF THE SOUTH TO THE EAST TOWN HOUSES SIMILAR TO WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS EVENING AND APARTMENTS TO THE NORTH AND RETAIL AND THEN THE LAKE OFF TO THE WEST, SO I'M NOT GOING TO SPEND TOO MUCH TIME THERE. MR GARRETT ALSO TALKED ABOUT OUR SITES. I THINK BEFORE WE EVEN GOT INVOLVED IN WORKING ON THIS . UM WE MADE A CALL TO THE CITY.

AND SO WHAT IS YOUR FUTURE LAND USE PLAN. IS THIS AN ALIGNMENT WITH? I KNOW THAT THERE'S A PD IN PLACE THAT'S FAVORING RETAIL AND OFFICE AND IS, ARE WE IN A LINE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN, AND WE FOUND OUT THAT AS MR GARIN TALKED ABOUT COMPACT NEIGHBORHOODS ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER AND URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER, SO BOTH ALLOWED FOR TOWN HOUSES TO BE PRESENTED AND DESIGNED ON THIS, AND SO BEFORE WE PROCEEDED FORWARD, WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE

[00:30:05]

[00:35:02]

[00:40:03]

SMALL LITTLE TEXT CENTER AREAS. PEOPLE WORKING FROM HOME WANT TO HAVE A SPACE WHERE THEIR DESK AND THEN THIS IS REALLY GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF THE PATIO LIVING AND OR I BELIEVE ONE OF THE ONLY TOWN HOUSE BUILDERS IN THE CITY THAT ARE USING FRONT PATIOS THAT ALLOW PEOPLE TO LIVE OUTDOORS AS WELL. MOVED THROUGH A COUPLE OF RENDERINGS WANTED TO SHOW HOW WE'VE BROKEN UP THE MASSING THIS IS FACING TOWARDS THE POND SHOWS IT AGAIN RIGHT HERE. I'M GOING TO MOVE THROUGH THESE QUICKLY BECAUSE I KNOW I'M OUT OF MY TIME. THERE WAS A LOT OF DISCUSSION ON THE THREE STORY TOWN HOMES WE'VE SHOWN WE'RE SHOWING A COUPLE OF THEM HERE THAT COULD FRONT ON POSSIBLY FRONT ONTO THE CREEK AREA WHERE THERE'S A WHOLE BUNCH OF TREES. I DON'T THINK ANYONE WOULD SEE THIS BEYOND THE TREES. AND I DON'T EVEN KNOW IF THERE'S A DEMAND FOR THAT. THIS IS THE TRAFFIC CALMING ISLAND. UM THIS IS IF YOU'RE FRONTING ONTO THE LAKE, I KNOW THERE'S ALL THE ALL THOSE TREES THERE. I'M GOING TO KIND OF JUST MOVE THROUGH HERE. THE CENTER AREA OF THE EASTERN TRACK. I THINK THERE WERE SOME COMMENTARY THAT ARE YOU DOING ENOUGH ON THE EASTERN TRACK? WE'VE ADDED THIS PAVILION INTO THE CENTER OF THE EASTERN TRACK TO GIVE ANOTHER AMENITY FOR PEOPLE ON THE EAST. SO THAT'S PART OF OUR TRYING TO GIVE MORE TO PEOPLE ON BOTH THE EAST AND THE WEST AND TRYING TO PAIR IT UP. THIS GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF THE AMENITY CENTER WITH THE POOL. THERE'S AN EXERCISE FACILITY. IT'S QUITE A LARGE EXERCISE FACILITY COVERED OUTDOOR PATIO. UM AND THEN, OF COURSE, OUR YOGA MAT AREA. AND THAT'S ALL I HAD FOR. MY PRESENTATION. I'M SORRY. I TOOK A LITTLE BIT LONGER. THERE WAS A LOT TO COVER. ALL RIGHT, UM, TO ANSWER ANYTHING. I JUST WANT TO CHECK. YOU HAVE OTHER FOLKS WITH YOU FROM YOUR TEAM HERE TONIGHT AND NEED TO SPEAK OR THERE WAS JUST I WAS GOING TO ASK THE ENGINEER TO THE ONE AREA THAT I DIDN'T REALLY COVER AND I NOT QUALIFIED TO COVER. IT IS STORM RUNOFF AND EROSION OF THE CREEK AREA. BECAUSE I KNEW THAT WAS A CONCERN OF SOME OF THE RESIDENTS ON THE TOWNHOUSE SIDE. HE'S HERE AND HE JUST NEEDS PROBABLY A MINUTE TO TALK ABOUT THAT. IF ANYONE WANTS TO HEAR THAT. OKAY WELL, WHAT I WHAT I'D LIKE TO DO , AND I KNOW I'VE GOT A COUPLE OF FOLKS THAT HAVE ALREADY QUEUED UP. I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND GET ALL THE SPEAKERS IN BECAUSE THERE IS THERE IS A LOT OF MOVING PARTS TO THIS CASE. I'D LIKE TO GET ALL THE SPEAKERS IN AND THEN WE CAN ASK THE APPLICANT QUESTIONS SORT OF AS A GROUP, THE GROUP TO A GROUP AND ANSWER AS MANY QUESTIONS AS YOU HAVE VERY GOOD, SIR. AND WE CAN, MADAM SECRETARY IF YOU CAN, AND I KNOW WE HAVE MR BALDWIN, WHO IS THE LANDOWNER AS WELL, WE'LL WE'LL HOLD YOU FOR LAST. SO MADAM SECRETARY. IF YOU CAN CALL THE NEXT APPLICANT SPEAKER THROUGH MY PRESIDENT, THAT'S ALRIGHT, SIR. DOING WELL. GOOD EVENING, MADAM TOLD KIM LEE HORN , 13, 4 55. NOEL ROAD, DALLAS, TEXAS. I'LL BE VERY QUICK. THE LAST GUY SAID THAT TO PROMISE I'LL BE QUICKER, SO I'M WORKING WITH CITY STAFF ON THE RUN OFF.

THERE WAS A COUPLE OF COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. SO WHAT WILL THE WAY THE SITE BREAKS DOWN? THERE'S THREE DRAINAGE SUB CATCHMENTS. ONE GOES TO THE POND ON THE WEST. ON THE EAST SIDE.

THERE'S TWO BROKEN UP SO EIGHT ACRES TO THE WEST, AND THEN THERE'S FOUR ACRES THAT GOES TO AN EXISTING STORM SEWER THAT'S ALREADY ADJACENT TO SHILOH ROAD. AND THEN THE FAR EAST SIDE GOES TO THE CREEK ON THE EAST. ALL OF THAT WE WILL NOT ENCROACH INTO THE FEMA FLOOD PLANTS ALREADY BEEN STUDIED ITS ZONE E. SO THERE'S NO ENCROACHMENT INTO IT . WE'RE NOT RISING IT. WE CANNOT SO THAT IF YOU HAVE MORE QUESTIONS I DRANK, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER THOSE. AND THEN AS FAR AS EROSION WE GOTTA FOLLOW TCP GUIDELINES, WHICH DOESN'T ALLOW, UM WE WILL HAVE DOWNSTREAM PROTECTION, SELF FENCE ALL OF THOSE NECESSARY THINGS TO PROTECT THE LAKE. OBVIOUSLY IT'S AN AMENITY FOR THE DEVELOPER AND THEN FOLLOW THE INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS, WHICH IS ONCE EVERY TWO WEEKS OR AFTER A HALF INCH RAINFALL AND THEN OBVIOUSLY THEY'RE GOOD STEWARDS OF THE ENVIRONMENT, AND WE'LL DO THAT. WOW YOU REALLY WERE FASTER THAN ALASKA. ALL RIGHT. STICK AROUND,

[00:45:05]

THAT YEAH, I BELIEVE THAT THAT WILL BE A CITIZEN COMMENT, SO I BELIEVE NEXT UP WOULD BE MR BALDWIN AS FAR AS THE APPLICANT SIDE. YES, SIR. MR BALDWIN. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR AND COUNCIL, UH, TRYING TO MAKE IT VERY BRIEF WITH MY FATHER AND STARTED THIS INVESTMENT BACK IN THE LATE SIXTIES EARLY SEVENTIES, AND WE'VE TRIED TO BE GOOD PARTNERS WITH THE CITY AND A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS WE'VE DONE IN NORTH IRELAND AREA. I THINK THIS , UH, DEVELOPERS EXPRESSED GREAT EFFORT TRYING TO WORK WITH THE CITY AND WITH ALL THE DIFFERENT PIECES, UH, THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND WHATNOT, AND WE THINK THAT THE LAND USE YOU KNOW, WE'VE MARKETED IT FOR A LONG TIME. WE HAD IT IN HIS OFFICE, WHICH THERE HAVE NOT BEEN HAVE NOT BEEN IN THE OFFICE TAKERS NOT BEEN ANY RETAIL TAKERS ON THIS SIDE. EVEN IF WE DID HAVE THOSE YOUR DENSITY AND YOUR TRAFFIC AS WELL AS YOUR RUNOFF, AND EVERYTHING ELSE WOULD BE MUCH WORSE THAN WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING THROUGH THIS DEVELOPMENT. AND WOULD PRETTY MUCH APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION. ALRIGHT VERY GOOD, SO I BELIEVE THAT SHOULD BE ALL THE SPEAKERS FROM THE APPLICANT TEAM. IS THAT CORRECT ? THAT IS CORRECT. ALRIGHT COUNCIL WILL OPEN IT UP FOR QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. UH, AND FIRST STEP I HAVE COUNCIL MEMBER BASS. THANK YOU, MAYOR. ACTUALLY, UM, IN ALL OF YOU MIGHT AS WELL COME DOWN TO THE FRONT ROAD, SO THAT WAY YOU'RE AVAILABLE. INTERCHANGE EITHER WAY. LET ME JUST GET RID OF THIS THING. AND THEN PAUL. PARLIAMENT TO QUESTION FOR YOU TOO, AS WELL. THANK YOU. OKAY NO, I'M SORRY FOR YOU GUYS FIRST. YES. SO, UM, LOOKING AT THE AMENITIES HERE? IS THERE ONLY ONE POOL. THERE'S ONE POOL. OKAY CORRECT. PEOPLE FROM THE EASTERN TRACKS WANT TO COME TO THE POOL THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO CROSS. SHILOH ROAD. CORRECT? YES OKAY. AND THEN THANK YOU. OKAY SO MY FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS RELATED TO THIS WILL BE FOR PAUL. THANK YOU, PAUL. OKAY PAUL, I'D LIKE TO SO LOOKING AT WHERE ■THE UM WHERE THEY PROPOSED FOR THE FOR THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TO BE ON THE NORTHERN PART OF THEIR PROPERTY. JUST LOOKING AT THIS AND WITH WHAT HE WAS TALKING ABOUT EARLIER ABOUT A CROSSWALK. LIGHT? UM. YOU KNOW, JUST LOOKING AT THIS. I WOULD THINK A GOOD LOCATION FOR THAT WOULD BE WHERE THE WHERE THE SOUTHERN INTERSECTION COMING ACROSS THIS PROPERTY WOULD BE AND THERE'S ANOTHER ONE JUST A QUARTER MILE DOWN THE ROAD FROM HERE, SO AND I SEE PEOPLE USE IT ALL THE TIME. SO THEN I KNOW THAT THEY FUNCTION WELL IN THAT AREA. UM, DID YOU GUYS LOOK AT THE POSSIBILITY OF HAVING ONE ON FURTHER SOUTH. I DON'T BELIEVE THEY TRYING TO REMEMBER BACK. I DON'T BELIEVE THEY HAVE PROPOSED ONE DOWN THAT FAR SOUTH. THEY REALLY WERE TRYING TO PUSH IT TOWARDS THE INTERSECTION AND WHERE IT IS NOW IT'S SO CLOSE TO THE INTERSECTION THAT IT DOESN'T REALLY MAKE SENSE TO CROSS IT THERE, SO RIGHT, I CAN AND I AGREE WITH YOU. I AGREE WITH YOU WITH IT BEING FURTHER NORTH, BUT I'M JUST THINKING OF, YOU KNOW IF THERE'S GOING TO BE KIDS CROSSING SHILOH ROAD. I JUST I JUST DON'T REALLY SEE THEM. WALKING FROM THE SOUTHERN END OF THIS PROPERTY ALL THE WAY TO THE INTERSECTION ACROSS AND THEN ALL THE WAY BACK DOWN TO THE SOUTHERN TO THIS PROPERTY. TO WALK ACROSS TO THE POOL. I THINK I THINK WE SHOULD WE SHOULD LOOK AT HAVING SOME KIND OF A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE ON THE SOUTHERN END OF THIS PROPERTY, WHERE THERE'S ALREADY A ROAD GOING ACROSS. IF WE'RE GOING TO PUT ONE THERE SOMEWHERE ALONG THERE , THAT WOULD BE A LOT BETTER PLACE. OKAY, I THINK SO. YES, SIR. WE NEED TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT DESIGNING IT FROM UP HERE. QUESTIONS RELATED TO IF IT DOESN'T MEET TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS, OR IF IT DOESN'T MEET A CERTAIN SAFETY OR REGULATION REQUIREMENT AS AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR REGULATION, AND THAT'S OKAY TO QUESTION THAT , BUT IF IT MEETS THOSE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS, IT'S REALLY NOT APPROPRIATE FOR US TO BE REDESIGNING THEIR PLAN. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. OKAY. WAS YOUR BEST ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? YES PAUL, CAN YOU TELL US ABOUT AND TRAFFIC STUDIES THAT WERE DONE TO THE ABOUT THE INTERSECTION OF SHADOW ON CABLE? YEAH, THEY DID A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. UH FOR THE FOR THE T I A AND I MEAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.

AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS WERE BASICALLY TO, UM. REALLY THE ONLY RECOMMENDATION WAS TO, UH

[00:50:04]

UM IT'S NOT ONE OF THE ONES THAT GOT FUNDED. VERY GOOD. COUNCIL MEMBER HEDRICK. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. AND YOU CAN THANK YOU. THANKS, PAUL. ANOTHER QUESTION FOR ENGINEER, PLEASE. I'VE HAD SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE RUNOFF INTO THE CREEK. AND THE PARK, ESPECIALLY ON THE WEST SIDE. YOU SPEAK A LITTLE MORE ABOUT THAT, AND ANY IMPACTS THE FLOODPLAIN OR IMPACT. YOU MAY HAVE THEIR ABSOLUTELY SO ALL OF THE ALL THE STORMWATER WILL BE COLLECTED IN AN UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER SYSTEM FAIRLY COMMON, SO THERE WON'T BE SHEET RUNOFF SPEAKING STUFF SPECIFICALLY FOR THE WEST TRACK, YOU KNOW, SHEET FLOWING OVER INTO THE INTO THE POND. IT WILL BE COLLECTED. AND THEN WE'RE RUNNING A STORM SEWER PIPE TO THE WATER LIMITS TO PREVENT EROSION. SO WE GOT TO COORDINATE THAT WITH THE CITY, WHICH WE'RE WORKING WITH ROMAN FOR THE FINAL ALIGNMENT WHEN WE DO CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO AVOID THAT AND HIS DETENTION REQUIRED FOR YOUR SITE. NO, IT'S NOT. SO WE'RE NEXT TO A STUDIED FEMA FLOODPLAIN AND SO ARE REQUIREMENT IS TO NOT INCREASE THE MOTOR SERVICE ELEVATION OF THAT OR ENCROACH INTO IT, WHICH WE'RE AVOIDING, AND YOU'VE DONE A STUDY SHOWING NO IMPACT THE WATER LEVEL OF THE DOWNSTREAM, OKAY? THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. VERY GOOD. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. I SEE NONE. THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN.

BUT STAY PUT. MADAM SECRETARY. IF YOU CALL HER NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE. AND IF YOU CAN COME FORWARD AND GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES DAYS, MY HUSBAND TONY, AND I LIVE AT 26. OH, FIVE HAZELWOOD PLACE GARLAND. OUR HOME IS ACTUALLY RIGHT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE GREEN BELT THAT FRONTS CAMPBELL LAKE. AND I WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU SO MUCH TO ALL THE COUNCIL MEMBERS, ESPECIALLY OUR MAYOR FOR ALL YOUR SERVICE TO GARLAND. GOOD THINGS ARE HAPPENING HERE, AND I ALSO WANTED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THIS BUILDER. VERY IMPRESSIVE, NO QUALMS AT ALL ABOUT THE PRODUCT. WE'VE DONE A GREAT JOB. I THINK TAKING IN WHAT THE PLANNING COMMITTEE WAS CONCERNED ABOUT AND BREAKING THAT DOWN THE DETAILS. I'D LIKE TO LIKE BACK OFF FOR A MINUTE. LET'S LOOK AT THE TOTALITY. OF THE BUILD ON THE WEST SIDE. SO THE SIDE WHERE THE POND IS THAT'S A UNIQUE SPACE AND THE FACT THAT OUR CITY HAD ZONED NONRESIDENTIAL.

PROBABLY WAS THE UNIQUENESS OF THE LAND THERE, ELEVATION THE WAY THAT IT'S SITUATED HERE. IT STILL FEELS LIKE, ALTHOUGH I WAS VERY EXCITED TO HEAR THE THREE STARTED TO STORY ON THAT SIDE. I THINK THAT'S GREAT. UM FOR THE APPEARANCE IF YOU THINK ABOUT THE GATEWAY TO GARLAND COMING DOWN, SHILO, YOU'RE GOING TO BE COMING DOWN SHILOH TOWARDS CAMPBELL AND YOU'RE GOING TO BASICALLY HAVE LIKE FORTRESSES ON BOTH SIDES. I WONDERED ABOUT THAT. I'M CONCERNED FOR THE CITY AND THE PARK AGAIN. NO OFFENSE, BUT I THINK THAT MUCH CONSTRUCTION IT'S GOING TO BE VERY DIFFICULT TO KEEP THE POND SAFE. SO I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT WILL LOOK OR WHAT YOU KNOW WHAT WILL THE CITY'S OBLIGATION BE TO KEEP THE PARK CLEANED UP? THE EROSION PIECE THAT I WAS DISCUSSING. I REALLY APPRECIATED THE ENGINEERING COMMENTS. THAT WAS AWESOME. IT'S NOT EVEN SO MUCH. HOW THAT WATER IS COMING ACROSS THE TOP. BUT YOU KNOW, I'M NOT AN ENGINEER, BUT FOR EVERY PIECE OF GREEN SPACE THAT'S GONE AND REPLACED BY CONCRETE OR ELEVATED ROOFS. IT'S MORE WATER RUNNING FASTER, AND SO THAT GOING THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE SYSTEM HITTING THE CREEK IS OUR CONCERN. EROSIONS OF THE CREEK. IT'S BEING ERODED BY ALL SORTS OF PEOPLE UPSTREAM , AND NOW WE'RE ADDING ANOTHER. WITH THIS BUILD, IT'S PROBABLY INSIGNIFICANT, BUT IT IS A CONCERN WHEN YOU'RE HAVING ISSUES WE'RE HAVING WITH EROSION. SO THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT. TODAY THE PLANNING COMMITTEE IMPRESSED UPON ME. IS THIS THE BEST HIGHEST USE FOR THIS LAND? IS IT REALLY WHAT WE WANT TO HAVE FOREVER ON? WHAT IS SUCH A BEAUTIFUL, UNIQUE PIECE? NOW I RESPECT THE FACT THAT HASN'T SOLD. IT WOULD BE NICE. IF SOMETHING YOU KNOW A LITTLE BIT MORE LOW PROFILE COULD BE THERE. BUT AGAIN, I APPRECIATE THE COUNCIL'S TIME TO SPEAK. I APPRECIATE THE BUILDERS PRESENTATION. I DID THINK IT WAS VERY GOOD, VERY DETAILED AND THANK YOU FOR LISTENING TO OUR CONCERNS. BUT I JUST HOPE THAT MAYBE OUR COUNCIL COULD THINK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT HOW THIS WILL LOOK GOING FORWARD, YOU KNOW, JUST THINK ABOUT THAT OVERALL APPEARANCE, THE DENSITY THAT'S ALREADY IN THE AREA AND KIND OF OVERPOPULATION. THAT'S THERE NOW , BUT I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. VERY GOOD. HANG ON. LET ME JUST COMMENT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE SPEAKER? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I WAS AT. I BELIEVE THAT WAS OUR LAST SPEAKER. CARD OR REGISTERED SPEAKER. IS THAT CORRECT? LAST SPEAKER? UH, JUST REAL QUICK. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? IF NOT, I WOULD LIKE

[00:55:03]

AND GOING THROUGH THE WHOLE PROCESS. WATCH THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING. AND YOU SAW THE LIST OF CHANGES THAT HE'S MADE SINCE SENT TO RESPOND TO ALL THEIR COMMENTS. UM PLAN COMMISSION WAS A BIT VAGUE ON WHAT THEY'D LIKE TO SEE THAT ON ON THIS SIDE, THEY WOULD KEPT SAYING, HIGHEST AND BEST USE, AND AS YOU HEARD, THE OWNER OF, SAY, THERE HASN'T BEEN ANY OFFICE USERS PROPOSED THERE HASN'T BEEN ANY COMMERCIAL USES PROPOSED. THERE IS COMMERCIAL USE OF MAJOR ONE RIGHT ACROSS THE WAY WITH A RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER WITH A GROCERY STORE AND TENANT THERE. THERE'S UM. IT WAS OWNED BACK IN 85 FOR ON ONE SIDE AND NOTHING SINCE THEN. ZONE IN 2006 ON THE OTHER SIDE. WE HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING YET. YOU GOTTA PROVE BUT NEVER GOT BUILT BECAUSE OF THE WHOLE HOUSING CRASHING. OH, EIGHT, BUT NOTHING SINCE THEN. SINCE THAT TIME WHEN I'VE BEEN ON PLANNING COMMISSION ON COUNCIL I'VE SEEN OTHER THESE RESIDENTIAL TYPE DEVELOPMENTS.

THERE WAS A HORIZONTAL, MULTI FAMILY THAT CAME THROUGH. I THINK THIS USES A MUCH BETTER USE THAN THAT ONE THAT WE SAW AT THAT TIME. UH, BETWEEN ALL WHAT ALL THEY'VE DONE TO REALLY WORK WITH THROUGH THE PROCESS ADDRESSED THE CONCERNS THAT WE'VE SEEN FROM THE PLAN COMMISSION. I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FOR APPROVAL OF THE PD AND ALLIE WAIVER, AND I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE TWO STORY RESTRICTION ON THE WEST SIDE SEAM MYSELF OUT THERE ENJOYING A CUP OF COFFEE ON A MORNING OVERLOOKING THE PARK IF I OWN ONE OF THOSE HOUSES, ONE OF THOSE TOWN HOMES THERE SORRY. MAKING SOME NOTES HERE. OKAY WE HAVE A MOTION. UH, COUNCIL MEMBER HEDRICK AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER LUCKED. IN THIS WOULD BE FOR ITEMS EIGHT A AND EIGHT B WITH THE BUT REMOVING THE TWO STORY RESTRICTION. IT WAS FOR EIGHT. A I'M SORRY. YES YES, YES, YES, YES. PD AND THE ALLEY WAIVER, OKAY? MOTION FOR EIGHT A.M. WITH WE STILL HAVE THE SAME SECOND. ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS? WE'RE VOTING ON EIGHT. A MOTION IS TO APPROVE.

SECRETARY. IF YOU COULD PRAY THE VOTE FOR US, PLEASE. AND DISPLAY THE BOAT. AND THAT ITEM IS APPROVED 71 WITH DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TIM SMITH IN OPPOSITION. SORRY. I TURNED YOUR MIKE UP. GO AHEAD. I UNDERSTAND THAT I'D LIKE TO MOVE FOR APPROVAL OF THE DETAILED PLAN. ITEM EIGHT B. WE

[01:00:02]

COUNCIL. AND DISPLAY THE VOTE. THAT ITEM IS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN. AND THAT MOVES US TO ITEM EIGHT. SEE, THIS ITEM ALSO HAS TWO PARTS. EIGHT C IS

[Items 8C & 8D]

THIS MAP SHOWS THE GENERAL LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND. HERE IS A MORE SPECIFIC LOCATION MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED HERE IN TEAL AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST MILLER ROAD AND COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. YOU CAN SEE THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH, A GARLAND FIRE STATION TO THE EAST, SOME MORE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS TO THE NORTH. AND TO THE NORTHWEST. UM ACROSS THE STREET IS A RETAIL STORE AND THEN TO THE WEST ACROSS COUNTRY CLUB IS A GIS D FACILITY. AND AGAIN THE TRACTORS DESIGNATED FOR COMMERCIAL USE. AND SO IT WOULD NECESSITATE A REZONING. THE CONFERENCE OF PLAN IDENTIFIES THIS TRACK AS COMPACT NEIGHBORHOODS, WHICH AGAIN IS KIND OF A MID DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION VERY MUCH ALIGNED WITH TOWNHOUSES AS OUR AS OUR PROPOSED THIS EVENING FOR THIS SORT OF INFILL SIGHT, IF YOU WILL. THIS IS SHOWING SOME PHOTOS OF THE AREA. THE VACANT SUBJECT SITE SHOWN. HERE ON THE TOP LEFT AND TOP RIGHT FROM SOUTH COUNTRY CLUB AND THEN MILLER ROAD AND JUST SOME OTHER VIEWPOINTS OF THE AREA LOOKING AT YOU LOOKING SOUTH. HERE'S THE PRO SITE PLAN. IT WOULD HAVE ACCESS, UM ALONG BOTH SOUTH COUNTRY CLUB AND EAST MILLER ROAD AGAIN. IT IS FOR 37 TOWNHOUSES. THESE WOULD BE INDIVIDUALLY PLANTED LOTS. AND THERE'S SOME GREEN OPEN SPACES AS WELL IN THE SITE AS WELL AS, UM, GUEST PARKING. THE AMENITIES PROPOSED FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD INCLUDE A SHADED STRUCTURE , BARBECUE GRILL, PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT, BIKE RACK, PICNIC TABLES AND BENCHES. THEY MEET THE GDC REQUIREMENT IN TERMS OF AMENITIES AND OPEN SPACE. AND AGAIN THE MENTIONED THE KIND OF MID DENSITY 6 TO 12 UNITS PER ACRE. THIS IS ABOUT 11.6 UNITS PER ACRE. SO WITHIN THAT COMPACT NEIGHBORHOODS, DESIGNATION OR RANGE PER THE CONFERENCE OF PLAN. HERE'S THE LANDSCAPE PLAN MEETS THE LANDSCAPING REGULATIONS OF THE GARLAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. AND JUST KIND OF A SNAPSHOT OF THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS. THIS WAS ASSOCIATED WITH AN ALLEY WAIVER AS WELL, OF COURSE THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANE COMMISSION. THESE WOULD BE FRONT ENTRY GARAGES. AND THERE ARE SOME DEVIATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS AS WELL. SIMILAR TO THE LAST CASE LOT AREA LOT DEPTH LOT WITH. I SHOULD MENTION THAT THIS IN THE PREVIOUS PROPOSAL, TOO, FOR THAT MATTER, MEET THE MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZE OF 1400 SQUARE FEET, SO THE DEVIATIONS ARE SIMPLY REGARDING THE LOT DIMENSIONS, NOT THE ACTUAL HOME OR DWELLING SIZE. THE DEVIATION FOR LOT AREA IS 1740 SQUARE FEET. WHEREAS THE REQUIREMENT IS 2000 SQUARE FEET FOR SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED. THE APPLICANTS JUSTIFICATION AS THE MINIMUM BUILDINGS WERE FOOTAGE IS BEING DECREASED TO ALLOW FOR THE PRODUCT. THE BUILDER WOULD LIKE TO PUT IN WHICH PER THE APPLICANT WILL BE A HIGHER QUALITY PRODUCT FOR THE END, USER LOT DEPTH SIMILAR TO THE PREVIOUS PROPOSAL, THE MINIMUM WOULD BE 70 FT, AS OPPOSED TO 90

[01:05:03]

APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST, AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AS WELL.

THAT WAS WITH AN 8 TO 0 VOTE DURING THEIR SEPTEMBER 12TH. MEETING. ABOUT THE ZONING CHANGE AND THE DETAILED PLAN. AND MAYOR WE MAILED OUT 101 NOTIFICATION LETTERS ON THIS CASE, AND WE RECEIVED TWO IN FAVOR. ONE IS WITHIN THE NOTIFICATION AREA AND ONE OUTSIDE AND WE RECEIVED SIX IN OPPOSITION FOR WITHIN THE NOTIFICATION AREA AND TWO OUTSIDE. BE GLAD TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS. VERY GOOD. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS ITEM? CASINO. THANK YOU WILL MADAM SECRETARY. CORNELL IS THE SPEAKER. THAT'S A REGISTERED VERY GOOD, SIR. COME FORWARD.

GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND WE'LL 10 MINUTES. YOU CAN MAKE YOUR PRESENTATION OR JUST ANSWER QUESTIONS TO YOU. MY NAME IS CODY CORONEL CCM ENGINEERING.

2570 JUSTIN ROAD. HIGHLAND VILLAGE, TEXAS. WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED A LOT OF SPECIFIC NEGATIVE FEEDBACK OR OPEN ROAMING, UM QUESTIONS OR ANY OUTSTANDING ISSUES. SO REALLY, JUST IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS YOU GUYS HAVE OR ANY KIND OF EXPLANATION WE CAN GIVE WE'D BE HAPPY TO DO SO. THE DEVELOPER IS ALSO HERE. VERY GOOD. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? PRO TIM MORRIS. THANK YOU, MAYOR, UM , HIGH CARDIO AGAIN. UM SHE'S OVER THERE. YEAH JUST A VOICE THAT YOU HEAR COMES THROUGH THE SYSTEM. UM A SENSE OUR MEETING WITH THE COMMUNITY THERE AND GIVING THEM A FIRST. LOOK AT THIS FOR ONE. I APPRECIATED THAT THE TIME THAT YOU ALL INVESTED WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE EFFORT YOU WENT TO PUT ACTUALLY PUT OUT FLYERS IN ADDITION TO THE POSTCARDS, IN ADDITION TO THE NOTIFICATIONS, UM, SINCE THAT TIME HAVE YOU RECEIVED ANY ? YOU SAID YOU HAVEN'T RECEIVED MUCH. HAVE YOU RECEIVED ANY SPECIFIC KICKBACK FROM THE FOR INSTANCE, THE H O A. THAT'S THAT'S NEAREST. PERSONALLY WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY FEEDBACK AND YOU HAVE. YEAH INSHALLAH IS NOT EITHER. HAVE I OKAY? THAT WAS REALLY MY ONLY QUESTION.

THANK YOU. IT IS A, UM IT IS A VERY INTERESTING AND BOUTIQUE, UH, TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENT IN AN AREA THAT WE NEED. MORE NICE HOUSING FOR SALE. THANK YOU, MAYOR. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? SECRETARY DO WE HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM? WE DO NOT HAVE ADDITIONAL SPEAKERS. VERY GOOD. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? I SEE NONE. MA'AM. MRS IN YOUR DISTRICT. GO AHEAD. OKAY THANK YOU. MAYOR. CAN WE TAKE EIGHT CND TOGETHER? CERTAINLY OKAY, SO I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THAT WE APPROVE A C AND D D AS PRESENTED. HAVE EMOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM MORRISON, A SECOND BY COUNCILOR MORE TO APPROVE ITEMS EIGHT C AND D AS PRESENTED ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION. MADAM SECRETARY. IF YOU COMPARE THE VOTE FOR US, PLEASE. AND COUNCIL. AND DISPLAYS BOTH PLEASE. AND THAT ITEM IS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU, SIR. ALL RIGHT. NEXT UP. WE HAVE

[Items 8E - 8G]

[01:10:04]

AND THE APPLICANT IS STATED THAT THE CHANGES IN THE ROUTING OF THE VEHICLES THAT WILL INCLUDE IMPROVE VEHICLE TRAFFIC FLOW AND ORGANIZATION ON SITE TO ALLOW FOR INCREASED PRODUCT FLOW. AND LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT THE REQUEST IS NOT TRIGGERED ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING SCREENING STANDARDS OR REQUIREMENTS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE ADDITIONAL PARKING SHOWN ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF THE SITE, WHICH THEY'RE MEETING THE PARKING LOT TREE REQUIREMENT. THEY'VE GOT SOME TREES SHOWN IN THE PARKING LOT FOR THE G. D. C. AND THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS. THE PREFABRICATED BUILDINGS. THESE WILL BE LOCATED WELL, INTERIOR OF THE SITE SHOULDN'T BE VISIBLE FROM UM PUBLIC STREET VIEW SHADED, CANOPIES SHADED STRUCTURES BEING PROPOSED. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THE S U P TIME PERIOD TO BE IN EFFECT FOR 20 YEARS. THAT IS THE TIME PERIOD THAT WAS APPROVED IN 2019. BUT SINCE THE APPLICANT IS AMENDING THE S U P. THEY'VE ASKED FOR KIND OF A, UM RESTART OF THEIR 20 YEAR. S U P TIME PERIOD. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. THIS, OF COURSE, IS A THREE PARTER. IT'S AN AMENDMENT TO A PD, THE S U P AND A DETAILED PLAN. AND THE PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AS WELL OF ALL THREE REQUESTS WITHIN 8 TO 0 VOTE. AND MAYOR WE MAILED OUT 36 NOTIFICATION LETTERS ON THIS CASE WE RECEIVED ONE RESPONSE IN FAVOR AND TWO AGAINST THE REQUEST. ALL THOSE WERE WITHIN

[01:15:05]

WE HAVE SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM. WE HAVE ONE SPEAKER MIKE CHECKED.

OKAY? YEAH. SEE IF THEY WANT. OKAY THANK YOU, SIR. I CAN GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. YOU'LL HAVE 10 MINUTES TO MAKE YOUR PRESENTATION OR JUST SIMPLY ANSWER QUESTIONS. IF THERE ARE ANY GOT MY NAME. PARDON ME. I'VE GOT A LITTLE LARYNGITIS. MY NAME IS MICHAEL SHOCKED WITH WHAT YOU MET RECYCLING. 6226 BLACKBERRY LANE. DALLAS TEXAS, 75248. MY PARTNER JIM AT RECYCLING AND FOUNDING MEMBER AND OUR EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT. I DO HAVE A PRESENTATION. I'M HAPPY TO SHARE IT. BUT IN THE INTEREST OF TIME , I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, AND I DO HAVE OUR CIVIL ENGINEER IF THERE'S ANY MORE TECHNICAL QUESTIONS. UM THAT NEED TO BE ANSWERED. UNFORTUNATELY THE ARCHITECT CAME DOWN WITH A CASE OF THE FLU SO HE COULDN'T BE HERE. BUT HE SAID. WE CAN CALL HIM SO I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS.

UH, BUT UP TO THIS POINT, UH, WELLS TEAM, THE PLANNING COMMISSION. AH AND COUNCILMAN VERA HAVE GIVEN US YOU KNOW UP TO THIS POINT, A LOT OF YOU KNOW, MUST HAVES TO GET TO WHERE WE ARE TODAY, YOU KNOW, STARTING BACK IN 2019, SO IT'S BEEN A NICE PROCESS AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE THE BEST PARTNERS WE CAN SO AVAILABLE TO TALK IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, VERY GOOD. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I DON'T SEE ANY. THANK YOU, SIR. APPRECIATE IT. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SAYING NONE. KESSLER RIVERA, THE SENIOR DISTRICT, SIR. THANK YOU, MAYOR. UM I WOULD LIKE TO PUT EXCUSE ME. E, F AND G TOGETHER. THREE OF THEM. YES, SIR. HMM. AND. I'M READY TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE IT. OKAY, AND THIS WOULD BE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS E EIGHT E EIGHT F AND A G. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILOR RIVERA'S SECOND BY COUNCILOR LUCKED ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION. SAYING THAT MADAM SECRETARY IF YOU COMPARE THE VOTE FOR US, PLEASE COUNCIL. AND DISPLAY THE VOTE. AND THAT IS APPROVED.

UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN. ALRIGHT WE'RE GOING TO KEEP GOING HERE WE ARE AT

[8H. Consider a Change of Zoning request by Kehinde Omo-Iyamu from Neighborhood Office (NO) District to Community Retail (CR) District, to allow a beauty salon in the existing building. The site is located at 2940 Broadway Boulevard and 2955 Dairy Road in District 5.]

BOTH SIDES OF THE BUILDING, AND THE APPLICANT IS NOT PROPOSING ANY BUILDING EXPANSIONS OR ANY REALLY PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS AT THIS TIME. IT IS JUST A USE CHANGE. BEAUTY SALONS ARE CLASSIFIED AS PERSONAL SERVICES AND THE G D. C, WHICH IS NOT A PERMANENT USE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE DISTRICT, BUT IT IS ALLOWED BY RIGHT AND COMMUNITY RETAIL. AND SO THE APPLICANT. IF APPROVED, THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO PROCEED WITH THEIR CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE BEAUTY SALON, AND IT WOULD OCCUPY A PORTION OF THE BUILDING. MY UNDERSTANDING IS A COUPLE OF OTHER TENANTS WOULD REMAIN AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE IS COMMUNITY RETAIL ZONING ALREADY IN PLACE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THIS INTERSECTION TO THE EAST, SOUTH AND WEST, OF COURSE, THE REMAINDER OF THE VACANT PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AND THERE'S AN OFFICE KIND OF SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY FURTHER TO THE NORTH AT HIS OWN NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE, BUT ACROSS FROM DAIRY

[01:20:03]

LOOKING SOUTH ACROSS THE INTERSECTION OF BROADWAY AND DAIRY AND LOOKING WEST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND ADDITIONAL PHOTO SHOWING THE RETAIL AND GAS PUMPS TO THE EAST. AND AGAIN BECAUSE THIS IS STRAIGHT ZONING. THERE IS NO DETAILED PLAN. OUR SITE PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REQUEST IS A CHANGE OF ZONING. ONLY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. WE FIND THAT THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGES COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND AS APPROPRIATE AS A CORNER LOT ON A PRIMARILY COMMERCIAL RETAIL INTERSECTION. THE PLANE COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AS WELL WITH AN 8 TO 0 VOTE. DURING THEIR SEPTEMBER 12TH MEETING. AND MAYOR. WE MAILED OUT 37. EXCUSE ME. 38 NOTIFICATION LETTERS ON THIS CASE, AND WE RECEIVED ONE IN FAVOR AND ONE OPPOSED AND BOTH OF THOSE WERE WITHIN THE NOTIFICATION AREA. OKAY VERY GOOD. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THE SIDE OF HASINA. THANK YOU. SECRETARY DO WE HAVE SPEAKER CARD ON THE SIDE OF I HAVE NO SPEAKER CARDS ON THIS AUTUMN. OKAY. DO WE KNOW IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT? OKAY UH, COUNCIL, IT APPEARS THAT THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT IF WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I SEE NONE. THANK YOU, SIR. JUST REAL QUICK. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? I SEE NONE. CAST FOR ELECTRICITY. YOUR DISTRICT MR MAYOR. I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEM. EIGHT H.

PRESENTED. VERY GOOD MOTION BY COUNCILOR LUCK. AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL HERE, VERA TO APPROVE ITEM EIGHT H AS PRESENTED. PRESIDENT SCUSI SHIN. MADAM SECRETARY, PRAYER THE VOTE FOR US, PLEASE. AND COUNCIL. AND DISPLAY THE VOTE. THAT ITEM IS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU, SIR. ALRIGHT COUNCIL. WE SEEM TO BE ON A ROLL. I KNOW WE'RE NEARING. WHAT WE NORMALLY DO IS BREAK TIME, BUT I HAVE FAITH THAT THAT OUR LUCK WILL HOLD. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO ITEM

[Items 8I & 8J]

[01:25:03]

COUNSELOR RELUCTANCE IN YOUR DISTRICT. I BELIEVE. MAKE A MOTION THAT SORRY. MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEMS. EIGHT I N J. HAS PRESENTED I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILOR RELUCTANT TO SECOND BY COUNCILOR MORE TO APPROVE ITEMS EIGHT I AND A J AS PRESENTED ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. MADAM SECRETARY. PRESIDENT VOTE FOR US, PLEASE. AND COUNCIL. AND DISPLAY THE VOTE. AND THAT ITEM ARE THOSE ITEMS ARE APPROVED. UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU, SIR. AND OUR LAST, UG

[8K. Consider amendments to the Garland Development Code relating to multi-family development covered parking and horizontal multi-family developments.]

[01:30:03]

TOWNHOUSE DENSITY MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT UNDER MF ZERO WOULD FOLLOW MULTI FAMILY STANDARDS FOR AMENITIES. THAT'S YOUR CLUBHOUSE, SWIMMING POOL, ETCETERA PARKING. SO THAT'S YOUR PARKING PER UNIT, DEPENDING ON THE NUMBER OF BEDROOMS, UM, AND SCREENING FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, SO JUST LIKE APARTMENT COMPLEX APARTMENT COMPLEX WOULD HAVE TO SCREEN AGAINST AN EXISTENT AND EXISTING ADJACENT SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. THIS WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW THOSE SAME STANDARDS THAN ANY OTHER MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, UM, WOULD BE REQUIRED TO ADHERE TO, HOWEVER, IT WOULD FOLLOW SINGLE FAMILY STANDARDS FOR BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS AND PERIMETER ROADWAY SCREENING. SO, UM, ANY ANY. DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE THOROUGHFARE WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW THOSE SIMILAR SCREENING ALONG THAT THEIR AFFAIR THAT A SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD AND THE COMMITTEE FURTHER RECOMMENDED, ELIMINATING A ROOF PITCH REQUIREMENT FOR THE STYLE OF DEVELOPMENT. THAT WAS ONE OF THE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE SINGLE FAMILY BUILDING STANDARDS, SO THEY KIND OF PICKED THAT ONE OUT AS SEEING THAT NOT BEING NECESSARY, SO ELIMINATING THE ROOF PITCH REQUIREMENT. ALSO THAT BUILDING SHALL BE A PLACE OF MINIMUM OF 10 FT. APART VERSUS THE MULTI FAMILY STANDARD OF 20 FT APART THAT ACTUALLY WAS ONE DEVIATION FROM THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED HORIZONTAL, MULTI FAMILY THAT, UM NOT A FEMALE REQUIREMENT WAS TO HAVE BUILDINGS 20 FT APART. 10. FT WAS REALLY MORE OF A SINGLE FAMILY STYLE, HAVE THEM A LITTLE BIT CLOSER TOGETHER. AND FINALLY, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THERE SHALL BE ONE ATTACHED AND CLOSED GARAGE PARKING SPACE PER UNIT. AND SOME OF THESE STANDARDS WERE BASED ON SOME A COUPLE OF OTHER CITIES IN THE REGION THAT WE LOOKED AT THAT HAD APPROVED A FEW PDS WITH THESE PARTICULAR STANDARDS, SO WE KIND OF HAD SOMETHING TO WORK WITH. UM AND THEN MOVING ON TO THE OTHER. REQUIREMENT PROPOSED REQUIREMENT. AN AMENDMENT TO THE GDC REGARDING MULTI FAMILY COVERED PARKING, WITH THE EXCEPTION, OF COURSE OF THE PROPOSED REQUIREMENT. I JUST MENTIONED FOR ENOUGH ZERO REGARDING PARKING KIND OF ONE ENCLOSED SPACE PER PER UNIT. THE COMMITTEE ALSO RECOMMENDED THE ELIMINATION OF A GENERAL COVERED PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. COVERED PARKING, OF COURSE, INCLUDES CARPORTS AND GARAGES. AND AS A RESULT OF THIS ELIMINATION, DEVELOPERS WOULD SIMPLY PROPOSED THE AMOUNT OF COVERED PARKING THE DESIRED AMOUNT OF COVERED PARKING FOR THEIR RESIDENTS, RATHER THAN RESPONDING TO A CITY REQUIREMENTS ARE KIND OF, IN OTHER WORDS, LEAVING IT TO THE MARKET VERSUS UM UM, HAVING IT BE A CITY REQUIREMENT. AND OF COURSE, THAT AS YOU KNOW, COUNCIL THAT'S BEEN A FAIRLY COMMON DEVIATION THAT WE'VE SEEN WITH. WITH SOME OF THE MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS. IT'S OFTENTIMES IT'S A DEVIATION IN ITSELF. THEY MAY NOT WANT THEY MAY NOT DESIRE TO HIT THAT 50% MINIMUM FOR VARIOUS REASONS, BUT IN OTHER CASES WHEN THEY DO PROVIDE THE 50% COVERED PARKING, USUALLY THROUGH CARPORTS OR COMBINATION OF CARPORTS AND GARAGES, IT OFTENTIMES TRIGGERS OTHER DEVIATIONS, SUCH AS BUILDING SETBACKS AND WHERE THE CARPORTS ARE PLACED AND KIND OF CREATE SOME OTHER ISSUES AS WELL. SO THAT'S KIND OF THE THOUGHT BEHIND THAT FROM FROM THE COMMITTEE, THE PLAN COMMISSION REVIEWED THE CHANGES BEFORE IT IS GONE BEFORE YOU ALL THIS EVENING. THEY REVIEWED IT UNDER DURING THEIR SEPTEMBER 12TH MEETING, AND THEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. THEY HAD SOME ADDITIONAL KIND OF CONVERSATIONS. THOUGHTS DURING THE PRE MEETING. THOSE DID NOT. THOSE WERE NOT PART OF THE MOTION, BUT THEY DID REQUEST THAT BE SHARED WITH THE COUNCIL . SO THAT IS YOUR STAFF REPORT THIS EVENING, BUT AGAIN, THE FORMAL MOTION WAS TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL. AND MAYORAL. STOP THERE. TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS. VERY GOOD. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS SIDE? UM I SEE. NO THANKS, SIR. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? I HAVE NO REGISTERED

[01:35:05]

COUNCIL MEMBER HEDRICK. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. I'D LIKE TO MOVE FOR APPROVAL TO THE AMENDMENTS OF THE GDC FOR MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT COVERED PARKING AND HORIZONTAL MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS. VERY GOOD. I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER HEDRICK AND THE SECOND BY COUNSELING RIVERA TO APPROVE ITEM EIGHT K AS PRESENTED. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION. SECRETARY IF YOU COMPARE THE VOTE FOR US, PLEASE. COUNCIL. AND DISPLAY THE VOTE PLACE COUNCIL MEMBER HEDRICK WAS GREEN LIKE I WASN'T SURE IF HE WAS GOING TO VOTE FOR HIS OWN HIM ON MOTION OR NOT THAT ITEM. THAT ITEM IS APPROVED . UNANIMOUSLY THANK YOU, SIR. I WAS WONDERING WHY YOU WEREN'T GOING TO VOTE FOR YOUR OWN MOTION THERE FOR A SECOND. ALL RIGHT. THAT WAS OUR LAST ITEM.

[9. Citizen comments]