[00:00:13]
GOOD EVENING. WELCOME TO THE JUNE 23RD MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THIS IS OUR QUESTION. WE, COMMISSIONERS START OUR MEETING WIT A PLEDGE. YOU'RE INVITED TO JOIN US. WILL YOU DO OR NOT? IN NO WAY AFFECTS THE DECISIONS OF THIS COMMISSION. ARE YOUR RIGHTS IN FRONT OF THE COMMISSION? TONIGHT'S PRAYER AND PLEDGE WILL BE LED BY COMMISSIONER CORNELIUS. LET US BOW OUR HEADS. DEAR GOD, WE COME BEFORE YOU WITH GRATITUDE AS WE GATHER TO SERVE OUR COMMUNITY. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK TOGETHER IN SHAPING A CITY THAT REFLECTS WISDOM, COMPASSION, AND FORESIGHT. WE ASK YOUR BLESSING ON THIS MEETING. GOD, OUR THOUGHTS AND DECISIONS WITH WISDOM AND FAIRNESS. WE LIFT UP OUR FIRST RESPONDERS AND CITY WORKERS. BLESS THEM WITH STRENGTH, SAFETY AND GRATITUDE FOR ALL THEY DO TO KEEP OUR CITY SAFE AND RUNNING SMOOTHLY. MAY OUR WORK TONIGHT REFLECT, CARE, RESPECT, AND A SHARED VISION FOR THE GOOD OF ALL. IN YOUR SON JESUS NAME, WE PRAY. AMEN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. GOOD EVENING. WELL, GOOD EVENING, AND WELCOME TO OUR MEETING. WELL, IT WAS CRANKED UP BECAUSE I WAS STANDING BACK THERE AND HE'S CRANKING IT BACK DOWN. THERE WE GO. ALRIGHTY. ONE ITEM ON OUR AGENDA OF NOTE IS CASE Z 23 DASH 11 MAX SHIELD SERVICES. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A POSTPONEMENT TO OUR JULY 14TH MEETING, SO COMMISSIONERS WILL DO THAT TO THE DATE DETERMINED. ALSO, IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT, IF YOU'LL PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE SPEAKER CARDS WHICH YOU CAN GET OUT IN THE HALLWAY OR THE SECRETARY'S STATION, FILL IT OUT, HAND IT TO HER, AND THEN WE CAN CALL YOU UP TO SPEAK ON A CASE. APPLICANTS GET 15 MINUTES TO PRESENT THEIR CASE. OTHER SPEAKERS, WE ALLOW THREE. YOU'RE SPEAKING FOR GROUPS SUCH AS A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. LET US KNOW AND WE'LL DEFINITELY ALLOW YOU SOME MORE TIME. AND ANOTHER THING IS, WE NEED YOU TO STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS IN THE MICROPHONE FOR THE OFFICIAL RECORDS. IF YOU DON'T, SOMEBODY WILL REMIND ME TO REMIND YOU. SO NAME AND TOWN KIND OF THING, AS THEY USED TO SAY IN THE RADIO. ALL RIGHT. ON
[a. June 9, 2025 Plan Commission Minutes]
TO OUR AGENDA. FIRST ITEM IS ITEM ONE, A JUNE 9TH, 2025 PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES FOR THE JUNE 9TH, 2025 MEETING. ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONER ABEL. OKAY. LET'S TRY THIS. YEAH. HERE WE GO. I MAKE A MOTION THAT THE JUNE 9TH MINUTES AS PRESENTED. WE HAVE MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ABEL AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER DALTON TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED. AND WE'LL TAKE A LITTLE BIT. WE'RE DEALING WITH SOME NEW SOFTWARE HERE, SO PLEASE BEAR WITH US. AND. YEAH. AND THAT PASSAGE IS UNANIMOUSLY WITH COMMISSIONER CORNELIUS. CORNELIUS, I BELIEVE ABSTAINING. CORRECT. ALRIGHTY. ZONING. OUR[a. Z 23-51 Hooda Enterprises, Inc. (District 7)]
FIRST CASE. Z 23 DASH 51. HODA ENTERPRISES, INC. CALLED A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF HODA ENTERPRISES, INC, REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PROVISION FOR FUEL PUMPS, RETAIL USE AND PROPERTY, ZONED COMMUNITY RETAIL, AND A CONCEPT PLAN FOR EXISTING FUEL PUMPS. RETAIL USE. THE SITE IS LOCATED AT 1401 BELTLINE ROAD. GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A STOP FOR FUEL PUMPS ON A SITE ZONED COMMUNITY RETAIL, AND AGAIN, THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WEREN'T HERE EARLIER WATCH THESE SCREENS. THE SCREENS AND THE POLLS OUT THERE HAVE AN EIGHT SECOND DELAY, SO YOU'LL BE ABLE TO FOLLOW EASIER BY WATCHING THESE. IT'S LOCATED AT 1401 BELTLINE ROAD. IT'S A 0.759 ACRE SITE. THIS IS WHERE IT'S LOCATED WITHIN THE GENERAL AREA. IT'S SURROUNDED BY GENERALLY COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT, AS WELL AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR A TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH AND WEST.THE RETAIL ZONED AREAS CONTAIN VARIOUS RETAIL USES LIKE RESTAURANT, RETAIL, EVEN AUTOMOBILE USES, AS WELL AS A CHURCH. THE SITE IS ZONED COMPREHENSIVE. THIS SITE IS
[00:05:03]
SLATED FOR COMPACT NEIGHBORHOODS, WHICH DOES ALLOW KIND OF LOWER DENSITY RETAIL USE LIKE THIS TO SUPPORT IT. HERE ARE PHOTOS OF THE SITE. THE SECOND, INCLUDING A CAR WASH THAT IS DEFUNCT AND THE OWNER DOES UNDERSTAND IF HE WISHES TO EVER BRING IT BACK UP, IT WOULD REQUIRE AN SUV. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A 20 YEAR TIME PERIOD, AND THE TIME PERIOD GUIDE IS 20 TO 25 YEARS. HERE'S THE CONCEPT PLAN SHOWING THE SITE. NOW, THERE HAD BEEN A FEW MINOR CODE VIOLATIONS IN THE PAST FOR THIS SITE. HOWEVER, THEY HAVE ALL BEEN RESOLVED PER THE CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT. THINGS SUCH AS LANDSCAPING, DYEING AND GRAFFITI THAT HE CLEANED. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. HOWEVER, WITH A FIVE YEAR TIME PERIOD TO START WITH TO ENCOURAGE THE BUSINESS TO STAY VIGILANT ON UPKEEP OF THE SITE. WE SENT OUT 76 LETTERS AND RECEIVED ZERO RESPONSES. I AM OPEN TO ANY AND ALL QUESTIONS, SIR. ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? SEEING NONE. OH, COMMISSIONER JENKINS AND. OKAY. IT SHOULD BE LIVE. NOW. LOOK FOR THE LITTLE RED LIGHT ON YOUR MIC. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. IS THE FIVE YEAR TIME FRAME THE MINIMUM THAT WE CAN DO? WELL, THE MINIMUM, I MEAN, THEORETICALLY, IS WHAT, LIKE ONE YEAR? NABILA? YES. IT COULD BE THEORETICALLY ONE YEAR, BUT WE FELT THAT WAS TOO EXTREME WITH FIVE YEARS BEING THE P PROR AMOUNT OF, OF GIVING HIM SOME TIME TO JUST, YOU KNOW, SHOWS THE UPKEEP AND DEDICATION TO THE SITE AND THEN COMING BACK, IF THERE ARE THINGS LIKE NO CODE VIOLATIONS. NO. NO OTHER KIND OF ISSUES WITH THE LANDSCAPING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, THEN WE WOULD CERTAINLY CONSIDER A LONGER SUP TIME RECOMMENDED. THANK YOU. I BELIEVE YOU SAID THERE ARE NO CURRENT CODE VIOLATIONS. THEY'RE ALL ALL PAST CODE VIOLATIONS HAVE BEEN RESOLVED. OKAY, THERE ARE NONE.OPEN ANY ISSUES WITH ANY NUISANCE ISSUES, ANY POLICE ACTIVITY AT THE SITE LOCATION OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY OF THAT. THAT COULD BE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.
AND THEN AS FAR AS ANY OF THE PAST CODE VIOLATIONS, THEY ALL RELATED TO GRAFFITI OR JUST POOR LANDSCAPING. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER ROSEN AND COMMISSIONER DALTON. GAS STATION THERE NOW AND IN A DEAD CAR WASH BUILDING IN THE BACK. YES, SIR. ARE THERE GOING TO BE LEVELED? NO, SIR. THE GAS STATION WILL REMAIN THERE, BUT IN IT IS IN GOOD CONDITION, PER THE PHOTO HERE. SO THEY'RE GOING TO ADD TO IT. THE APPLICANT DOES NOT. I SPOKE TO THE APPLICANT PREVIOUSLY AND HE DOES NOT BELIEVE IT WOULD BE THE BEST CHOICE FOR HIM TO DEMOLISH IT.
BUT YOU CAN CERTAINLY DISCUSS WITH HIM. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER DALTON AND COMMISSIONER DUCKWORTH. AND IT TAKES A SECOND FOR YOUR MIC TO COME LIVE. HAS THE CODE VIOLATIONS BEEN SYSTEMIC? THEY'VE BEEN PRETTY CONSTANT. OR DID THEY JUST GET BROUGHT UP? SO THEY WE JUST SIMPLY REACHED OUT TO CODE OURSELVES. AND I WOULD SAY IT WAS ABOUT MAYBE A SLIGHTLY OVER ONE VIOLATION PER YEAR SINCE IN THE LAST DECADE. SO THEY AREN'T A CONSTANT, PERSISTENT THING, BUT SOMETHING SYSTEMIC. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER DUCKWORTH.
AND. YOU SHOULD BE LIVE IN ABOUT NOW. THANK YOU. HEAR ME NOW? YES, SIR. TALKING ABOUT THE VEGETATION, IS IT IS IT IN, IN. ACCORDING TO COMPLIANCE. NOW THERE ARE CURRENTLY ZERO OUTSTANDING CODE VIOLATIONS WHEN IT COMES TO LANDSCAPING UPKEEP. OKAY. AND IN READING THIS, I UNDERSTAND THE CURRENT SUV RAN OUT IN 23. YES, SIR, I BELIEVE SO. THEY THE SUV. SO YES, THIS THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN AN SUV RENEWAL, BUT THEIR SUV EXPIRED IN MARCH 2023 AND THEN THE APPLICANT APPLIED OFFICIALLY IN CEMBER 2023. SO IT IS AN EXISTING GAS STATION. BUT WE DID TITLE IT JUST A SPECIFIC USE PROVISION AS OPPOSED TO A RENEWAL BECAUSE OF THIS. I'M JUST WONDERING, DID THE APPLICANT NOT NOT APPLY BEFORE THE OTHER ONE RAN OUT? WELL, HE DID NOT APPLY BEFORE THE OTHER ONE RAN OUT. HOW HOW DOES. SO I'M LEARNING ON THIS LIKE SOME COUNCIL. HOW FAR AHEAD SHOULD THEY APPLY FOR RENEWAL BEFORE IT RUNS OUT? SO CURRENTLY WE ARE LOOKING INTO THOSE PROVISIONS TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE A POLICY IN PLACE. WE DO NOT NECESSARILY
[00:10:03]
HAVE A POLICY IN PLACE, BUT THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE EXPIRATION OF THE PREVIOUS OF THE EXISTING SUPPY OTHERWISE, THEY'RE IN VIOLATION. AS LONG AS THE APPLICATION IS IN. WE CAN CONSIDER THAT AT LEAST THEM TRYING TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR POLICIES. BUT THESE ARE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE'RE GOING TO FLESH OUT IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS REGARDING THE TIMELINES, WHEN THE APPLICATIONS NEED TO COME IN FOR RENEWAL PURPOSES, AND WHAT SHOULD BE GENERALLY OUR POLICY TO NOTIFY THE PROPERTY OWNERS ABOUT THE UPCOMING EXPIRATION OF THE RECIPES. THANK YOU. YEAH. AND THIS IS JUST KIND OF GENERAL INFORMATION. NOT A PART OF THIS CASE IS THE CITY IS LOOKING INTO SOFTWARE TO TRACK SUPS. AND I'M GUESSING IT'LL TRIGGER A NOTICE TO GO OUT TO REMIND PEOPLE COULD POSSIBLY DO THAT. BUT IS ANY OF YOU OWNED A BUSINESS BEFORE YOU DON'T WAKE UP ONCE A MONTH AND GO, OH, IS MY SUP UP TO DATE? SO THE SOFTWARE IS IN GENERAL FOR ALL PERMITTING AND PLANNING AND ZONINING APPLICATION. WE WILL TY TO INCORPORATE THE SUP NOTIFICATION WITHIN THE SOFTWARE, BUT THAT'S STILL A WORK IN PROGRESS. IT'S A WORK IN PROGRESS. YEAH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER JENKINS. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. COMMISSIONER DUCKWORTH HAD AN EXCELLENT QUESTION, AND I JUST I WASN'T QUITE CERTAIN. I HEARD THE ANSWER IS THE CURRENT LANDSCAPING AT THE PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE WITH WHAT TODAY'S STANDARD WOULD BE? NO, SIR. SO WHEN THE GAS STATION WAS BUILT AND LANDSCAPING WAS INSTALLED, IT WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE AT THE TIME. BUT FAST FORWARD TO TODAY. IF SOMETHING HAPPENED TO TRIGGER, WHICH NOTHING HAS HAPPENED TO TRIGGER YET, THEM COMING UP ALL THE WAY TO CODE WITH LANDSCAPING, THEN THEY WOULD NOT BE IN COMPLIANCE. SO YES, THEY ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THEIR SITE PLANS RIGHT NOW.BUT IF A NEW GAS STATION WAS THEORETICALLY BUILT ON THIS SITE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO ADD LANDSCAPING IN THE BUFFER AS OPPOSED TO THE THOUGHT IS IF THEY HAVE TO, WE'RE TRIGGERING THE RENEWAL OF AN SP THAT WAS COMPLETELY TERMINATED, RIGHT. WE ARE GIVING THEM TECHNICALLY A NEW SUV, BUT YES IT IS. THERE WAS ONE BEFORE. SO IF I'M CORRECT, DON'T TRIGGER LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE. OH YES, IF THAT'S WHAT THE QUESTION WAS. AN SP RENEWAL OR NEW SP WOULD NOT TRIGGER. THEY DO NOT. BUT THE PLAN COMMISSION CAN ADD THAT IN A CONDITION IN YOUR MOTION.
THANK YOU. THAT WAS THE ANSWER THAT I WAS LOOKING FOR. YEAH. I ACTUALLY HAD SOME QUESTIONS TONIGHT. NO, Y'ALL KEEPING ME ON MY TOES. THANK YOU. AND IF YOU NEED TO, YOU CAN MOVE THE MICROPHONE CLOSER TO YOU. UNLESS THERE'S STUFF IN THE WAY. THERE YOU GO. I THINK THAT'S IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I HAVE NO SPEAKER CARDS ON THIS. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? CARE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? YEAH. YOU DON'T HAVE TO. AND JUST NEED YOUR. GOOD EVENING. I JUST WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU. NEED YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. MY NAME IS RALPH ARIF. HUDA AND MY BROTHER AND I. IT'S A FAMILY BUSINESS. THIS WAS OUR FIRST BUSINESS. SO THAT'S. THAT'S WHY MY NAME IS ON AS RALPH CHEVRON. AND ALL OUR OTHER STATIONS. WE DO NOT HAVE AN SUV ON ANY OF THOSE. SO IT'S KIND OF THIS IS KIND OF A LITTLE BIT NEW TO US. SO THAT'S WHY THE WORK IS BEING DONE ACROSS THE CHANNEL TO MAKE IT, YOU KNOW, WITH THE ELECTRICAL GRID AND ALL THAT PEOPLE MOVING, THEY'RE WORKING ACROSS BELTLINE AND GARLAND AVENUE. ONCE THEY ARE FINISHED, WE'RE GOING TO START LEVELING IN AND MAKING SURE THAT EVERYTHING IS LOOKING CLEAN AND NEAT. BUT I ASSURE YOU, WE'VE BEEN THERE FOREVER. OUR COMMUNITY ALL LOVES US, WE'VE BEEN THERE, AND WE'LL ALWAYS BE THERE FOR THEM. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? I THINK THERE MAY BE 1 OR 2 COMING, COMMISSIONER JENKINS, HERE WE GO. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. SIR, YOU'VE HEARD THE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE LANDSCAPING, WOULD YOU BE AMENABLE, AGREEABLE TO PUTTING IN ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING TO BRING THE PROPERTY UP TO TODAY'S. ABSOLUTELY, ABSOLUTELY.
YEAH. I MEAN, I THINK I THINK THE IDEA, IN MY OPINION, IS TO ADD SOME CRAPE MYRTLES TO THE FRONT, BECAUSE LAST TIME WE DID THE SOUP, WE ADDED THE CRAPE MYRTLES ON THE SIDE AND WE ADDED THE BUSHES IN THE FRONT. BUT ALL THOSE BUSHES DIED BECAUSE OUR WHILE THEY WERE DOING ALL THESE CONSTRUCTION YEARS AGO, ALL THE SPRINKLER WAS COMPLETELY GUTTED OUT. SO WE DON'T HAVE ANY SPRINKLERS IN THERE. SO WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST TO MAKE IT LOOK NICER THAN WHAT IT IS NOW WE DO
[00:15:04]
HAVE TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE CRAPE MYRTLES ON THIS SIDE. WE HAVE 2 OR 3 THIS SIDE. PLUS WE HAVE A TREE IN THE FRONT, TREE IN THE BACK AND TWO OVER THERE. SO WE COULD ADD SOME CRAPE MYRTLES ON BELTLINE. WELL LOOK WE HAVE SOME OF THE BEST STAFF IN THE REGION AND THEY CAN DIRECT OR HELP GUIDE YOU TO WHAT YOU KNOW YOU COULD PUT IN THAT AREA, BUT WE LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR CONTINUED WORK THERE. THANK YOU. ABSOLUTELY. YEAH. I TOOK THE WORDS OUT OF MY MOUTH. GET WITH STAFF BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AND DOESN'T HAVE TO COME COMPLETELY TO CODE. JUST ENHANCE IT, MAKE IT NICER. WE WILL HAVE TO WAIT FOR ALL THE CONSTRUCTION TO FINISH BECAUSE THEY ARE STILL DOING IT RIGHT NOW. ALL RIGHT, CITY OF GARLAND. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER ROSE. AND. UP AND.THERE WE GO. THERE YOU ARE. THE GAS PUMPS GOING TO STAY THERE AND BE OPERATIONAL? OH, YEAH.
THE GAS PUMPS ARE BRAND NEW. BUT THE BRAND, THEY'RE BRAND NEW LIKE THEY'RE SEVERAL FIVE, FIVE YEARS OLD AND THEY USUALLY LAST 20 YEARS. AND THE GAS STATION ITSELF, IS THAT GOING TO BE REMODELED? NO, IT'S ALREADY REMODELED. THAT'S WHY I GOT THE FIRST. IT'S VERY FULL. THAT'S WHY I GOT THE FIRST SUV IN 2003, WHEN THE CITY OF CITY OF GARLAND TURNED WET WILL BE IN WINE.
YEAH, THAT'S WHEN I WENT FROM A SMALL 700 SQUARE FOOT STORE TO THE 2000FT■S. SO THAT'S WHY I HD TO APPLY FOR THAT. AND THE CAR WASH IN THE BACK, IS THAT GOING TO GET REMOVED? SO THE CAR WASH WE ARE GOING TO WE ARE GOING TO FIGURE OUT ANOTHER ALTERNATE PROFIT CENTER. AND I UNDERSTAND THAT I WOULD NEED A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THAT, WHICH I WOULD HAVE TO APPLY AT THAT TIME, WHATEVER IT IS. OKAY. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT I SEE NONE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING DOWN. ALL RIGHT. AND I HAVE NO OTHER SPEAKER CARDS. ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE CARE TO ADDRESS THIS CASE? SEEING NONE.
COMMISSIONERS. MOTION DISCUSSION. WE HAVE A COMMISSIONER. ROSE, LET ME GET YOU LIVE THERE. YEAH, GO FOR IT. WELL, I MOVE THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE REQUEST AS PRESENTED. OH, I THINK TEN YEARS WOULD PROBABLY BE BETTER. WELL, WAS THAT GOING TO INCLUDE THE REQUEST THAT THEY WORK WITH STAFF ON LANDSCAPING TO ABSOLUTELY IT. AND YOU'RE SUGGESTING TEN YEARS, CORRECT? CORRECT. OKAY. COMMISSIONER JENKINS WANTED TO SECOND A MOTION. YOU ARE LIVE NOW, SIR, I AGREE. SECOND TO THAT. OKAY. WITH TEN YEARS AND ENHANCED LANDSCAPING STOPPED. OKAY. ALRIGHTY. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION APPLICATION OF THE SCP FOR A PERIOD OF TEN YEARS, AND THAT THEY WORK WITH STAFF BEFORE GETTING THE COUNCIL TO ENHANCE THE LANDSCAPING. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION THE MOTION IS TO APPROVE. ALRIGHTY, AND TAKE A SECOND. BUT WE SHOULD GET. THERE WE GO.
YEAH. REMEMBER TO HIT THE SAVE BUTTON AGAIN. NEW EQUIPMENT. WE HAVE TO VOTE AND HIT SAVE. AND
[b. DD 25-02 Rashad Haiddar (District 2)]
THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU SIR. THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS ITEM TWO B HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF RASHAD HAIDER. NOW HE HAS ASKED THAT THIS ITEM BE POSTPONED TO OUR JULY 14TH MEETING. DO I HEAR A MOTION TO DO SO? OKAY, LET ME CLEAR THE LAST ONE. OKAY, COMMISSIONER DALTON, AND LET ME. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE POSTPONE THE MEETING, POSTPONE THIS CASE AS REQUESTED. AND, COMMISSIONER JENKINS, YOU SECONDED. ALL RIGHT. AND THAT WAS TO THE TIME DETERMINED JULY 14TH. CORRECT? CORRECT. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND TO POSTPONE THIS ITEM TO JULY 14TH. ANY DISCUSSION? PREPARE TO VOTE.[00:20:01]
AND THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ALRIGHTY THEN. NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS ITEM 2CZ 25 DASH 12[c. Z 25-12 Wikkibear LLC (District 5)]
WHISKEY BEAR, LLC. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF WHISKEY BEAR, LLC, REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PROVISION FOR FOOD PROCESSING AND STORAGE USE ON PROPERTY. ZONED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. THE SITE IS LOCATED AT 2740 OAKLAND STREET. GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OKAY. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A FOOD PROCESSING USE AND STORAGE USE. IT'S FOR AN SCP REQUEST. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND THE ADDRESS IS 2740 OAKLAND STREET. THE PROPERTY IS SHY OF ONE ACRE IN SIZE. AND THIS IS THE LOCATION OF THE SITE OFF OF OAKLAND STREET. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THE PROPERTY IS COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY INDUSTRIAL, ZONING, DISTRICT, AND INDUSTRIAL USES. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAS IDENTIFIED THIS AS INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRY CENTER. INDUSTRY CENTERS PROVIDE A CLUSTER OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY THAT CUMULATIVELY EMPLOY LARGE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE. OPERATIONS WITHIN THIS DEVELOPMENT TYPE MAY REQUIRE SUBSTANTIAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND MAY RESULT IN MORE SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE IMPACTS SUCH AS SOUND, AIR TRAFFIC, OUTDOOR LIGHTING, STORAGE, AND OTHER FACTORS.OPERATIONS MAY INCLUDE SUCH ELEMENTS AS SEMI TRUCK TRAFFIC, LOADING DOCKS, VISIBLE AND VISIBLE OUTDOOR STORAGE. OVERALL, THE ARCHITECTURE, CHARACTER, SCALE AND INTENSITY SHOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TYPES. THESE ARE PHOTOS OF THE SITE OFF OF OAKLAND STREET. AND MORE PICTURES OF THE SITE. AND THIS IS AN AERIAL. THE SITE WAS ACTUALLY IN OPERATION AS A FOOD PROCESSING AND STORAGE USE PRIOR TO THIS NEW PROPERTY OWNER PURCHASING IT FOR 29 YEARS. THE THING IS THAT DURING THAT TIME WHEN IT WAS PURCHASED, THE CODE DID NOT REQUIRE FOR THEM TO GET AN SCP FOR THE USE, SO IT WAS PERMITTED BY RIGHT. SO WHEN THE APPLICANT AFTER THE APPLICANT PURCHASED THE PROPERTY AND IT EXCEEDED THAT LEGAL NONCONFORMING PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS, WHICH TRIGGERED WHICH MAKES THEM HAVE TO COME INTO CONFORMANCE WITH OUR CODE REQUIREMENTS. SO AN SCP REQUIRED. THE SCP TIME PERIOD GUIDE RECOMMENDS A PERIOD OF 20 TO 25 YEARS, AND THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE MAXIMUM TIME PERIOD PERMITTED. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST, WITH THE CONDITION THAT ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING BE ADDED ON SITE. THIS IS AN AERIAL IMAGE OF THE SITE. IT HAS ALMOST NO PERVIOUS GROUND OR AREA. TO ADD MORE LANDSCAPING, SO WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT THE APPLICANT ADD SOME SORT OF. IT'S KIND OF BLOCKED HERE. PLANTERS ALONG THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING WITH XERISCAPE PLANTINGS THAT ARE PLANTINGS THAT ARE DROUGHT RESISTANT AND DISEASE RESISTANT UP AT THE FRONT. AND THE SITE HAS ABOUT SEVEN PARKING SPACES. THE THIS USE WOULD REQUIRE 21 PARKING SPACES. THE WAY THAT IT'S WRITTEN IS THAT IT'S ONE PARKING SPACE PER EVERY 1000 GROSS FLOOR AREA, OR FIVE SPACES PER VISITOR, OR PER NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES PER SHIFT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. AND IN THIS CASE, THE 21 PARKING SPACES WOULD BE GREATER. SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME IN FOR AN ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE REQUEST AND SUBMIT A TRAFFIC STUDY TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PARKING ON SITE IS SUFFICIENT FOR THE PROPOSED USE. AND THERE WAS ONE LETTER IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST. STAFF IS AVAILABLE. ANY QUESTIONS? ONE CLARIFICATION THE PARKING SITUATION IS NOT A CONSIDERATION IN THE ISSUE TONIGHT, CORRECT? YES. EVEN THAT EVEN IF IT'S
[00:25:02]
APPROVED, THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO COME THROUGH THE ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE PROCESS AND WE'D HAVE TO REVIEW THE PARKING STUDY TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S SUFFICIENT, WHICH WE DON'T FORESEE AN ISSUE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICANT CAN ALSO SPEAK ON THIS BECAUSE OF THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES THAT THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE ON SITE. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? SEEING NONE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AGAIN, I DON'T HAVE A SPEAKER CARD IN THIS CASE IS COME ON DOWN, SIR. AND NAME AND ADDRESS PLEASE. GOOD EVENING. HUGH PINDER WITH MASTER PLAN. ADDRESS IS 2201 MAIN STREET, DALLAS, TEXAS. 75201. I AM REPRESENTING MR. LABARBA TONIGHT. HE COULD NOT BE HERE.HE'S TRAVELING WITH HIS FAMILY ON HIS WAY BACK FROM SEATTLE. SO SMALL FAMILY COMPANY THERE IN GARLAND RIGHT NOW ON MARKET STREET. HE'S BEEN THERE FOR JUST OVER FIVE YEARS. MAY WAS HIS FIFTH YEAR ANNIVERSARY THERE. HE BOUGHT THIS LOCATION, AS THE PLANNER EXPLAINED, THINKING THAT HE COULD MOVE RIGHT IN ANDET A BUILDING PERMIT TO DO THAT. AND WE FOUND OUT WE NEEDED THE SPACE. SO HERE WE ARE, THE CONTAINER THAT YOU SEE OUT FRONT. HE IS REPLACING THE ROOF ON THE BUILDING. SO THAT'S WHAT THAT'S FOR. HE HAS EIGHT EMPLOYEES. AND RIGHT NOW THIS LOCATION IS GOING TO BE OVERFLOW. SO WE DON'T FEEL LIKE THE PARKING WILL BE AN ISSUE.
BUT WE UNDERSTAND THE ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE. AS YOU AS YOU MAY HAVE SEEN, I HAD A VERY HARD TIME FINDING A PLACE FOR THE SIGN BECAUSE THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO GROUND OTHER THAN CONCRETE. I FOUND AN EXPANSION JOINT THAT WAS WIDE ENOUGH TO FIT THE SIGN, OTHERWISE I DIDN'T KNOW HOW I WAS GOING TO PUT THE NOTICE OUT THERE. YEAH, EVEN THE RIGHT OF WAY IS CONCRETE OUT THERE. SO THE ENTIRE SITE MINUS THE BUILDING IS CONCRETE. SO HE'S NOT CRAZY ABOUT THE LANDSCAPING, BUT HE WILL CERTAINLY COMPLY WITH THAT. SO I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. THAT'S WHY IN MY ZONING CLASS I STRESS RUN THE TRAPS BEFORE YOU BUY ANY PIECE OF PROPERTY. COMMISSIONER DUCKWORTH, JUST A SECOND. THERE WE GO. AND. THERE YOU GO. THIS WILL SAY THANKS TO THE OWNER. WE APPRECIATE HIM HELPING US TO KEEP A PROPERTY IN IN PROGRESS AND KEEPING OUR CITY MOVING FORWARD. DULY NOTED. I'M GLAD TO HEAR THAT. SO I'M HOPING THAT'S WHAT THE ONE SUPPORT LETTER WAS FROM RIGHT NEXT DOOR WAS HAPPY THEY WOULDN'T HAVE A VACANT NEIGHBOR, RIGHT? WELL, IT'S NOTHING LIKE HAVING A VACANT BUILDINGS AROUND FOR CREATING PROBLEMS THAT WE DON'T NEED. SO THANK YOU. CERTAINLY WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN HIGH GRASS AND WEEDS, RIGHT. WITH NO. NO LANDSCAPING. YEAH. MANY YEARS AGO I HAD A GENTLEMAN WHO CREATED OR PRODUCED DONUT FLOUR. SO I'M KIND OF FAMILIAR WITH THOSE KIND OF THINGS. I GUESS I SHOULD PROBABLY TELL YOU WHETHER YOU'RE GOING TO ASK OR NOT. SO I DON'T KNOW WHERE HE GOT THAT NAME FROM. THE COMPANY IS AMERICAN PRODUCE AND REPACK, SO THIS WILL JUST BE AN EXTENSION OF THAT. THEY GET PRODUCE IN FROM THERE, KIND OF A LAST MILE DISTRIBUTOR FOR FOOD SERVICE AND RETAIL LOCATIONS. SO I LIKE THE NAME. YEAH I DON'T KNOW WHERE THAT CAME FROM. SO IT'S NOT AS EXCITING AS PROBABLY AMERICAN PRODUCE. SORRY. WELL I SEE NO OTHER QUESTIONS. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING. I'LL ASK ANYBODY ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO ADDRESS THIS CASE, SEEING NONE. COMMISSIONERS MOTION DISCUSSION. AND IF YOU JUST WANT TO DISCUSS AT ANY TIME ON A YOU CAN JUST HIT THAT REQUEST TO SPEAK TO. SO OKAY, COMMISSIONER JONES, LET ME GET YOU LIVE HERE. YEAH. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE AS. OKAY. CLARIFICATION. THERE'S A 20 TO 25 YEAR SP ONE PREFERRED OVER THE OTHER. NO PARKING IS THAT A RECOMMENDATION? WELL, HE ASKED, WE HAVE TO DO AN SP FOR A TIME. DETERMINES. YEAR 20, 20, 20 YEARS. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SNP FOR A TIME PERIOD OF 20 YEARS. COMMISSIONER PARIS CHIMED IN FIRST. IT WAS A SECOND. THE MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ACCEPT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION FOR THE 25 YEAR TIME PERIOD. I THOUGHT YOU WERE GOING WITH IT. OKAY, BUT ARE YOU STATING THAT WE NEED TO HAVE DISCUSSION BASED ON IS IT 25 YEARS OR 21 TO GO ALONG WITH STAFF RECOMMENDED? IT WAS 25. I'LL DO THAT ONE. IT'S JUST WE'RE GOOD, BUT 25. BUT WE ALSO HAVE A CONDITION ABOUT THE LANDSCAPE PLANTERS. IT WILL BE
[00:30:05]
GOOD TO INCLUDE THAT IN THE MOTION. WE KIND OF MAKE OUR MOTIONS HERE A LITTLE BIT. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SP FOR 25 YEAR TIME PERIOD, AND WITH THE ADDITION OF THE PLANTERS FOR PLANTERS WAS STAFF RECOMMENDATION MOTION. AND SECOND, AND I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER DALTON. DID YOU CARE TO SPEAK OR COMMISSIONER DUCKWORTH OR UP. OKAY. AND YOU SHOULD BE LIVE IN ABOUT EIGHT SECONDS. I WAS GOING TO JUST MAKE A COMMENT OR A QUESTION IN AN INDUSTRIAL AREA LIKE THIS, WHAT IS THE REAL BENEFIT OF CREATING A REQUIRING LANDSCAPING ON A STREET? THAT IS RARELY DRIVEN DOWN? I'M JUST KIND OF WONDERING WHAT THIS IS GOING TO ACCOMPLISH IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. GENERALLY SPEAKING, WE DO WANT TO EVENTUALLY, IN LONG TERM, OUR STREETS NOT TO LOOK AS. AS THIS STREET RIGHT NOW AND HAVE SOME BEAUTIFICATION ADDED. SO IT MAY SEEM A LITTLE IRRELEVANT RIGHT NOW FOR THIS ONE PROPERTY, BUT EVENTUALLY, OVER 20 YEARS, IF WE CAN GET PROPERTIES AFTER PROPERTIES TO ADD SOME LANDSCAPING AND THAT WILL GENERALLY BEAUTIFY OUR STREETS AND WHOEVER DRIVES DOWN THE STREET, THAT WILL HELP BUILD UP GARLAND'S IMAGE A LITTLE BETTER, IN OUR OPINION. I CAN'T DISAGREE WITH THAT THINKING, BUT SOMETIMES I WONDER. I DO KNOW OF A COUPLE OF STREETS AROUND WHERE WE HAVE PASSED ON LANDSCAPING COMPLETELY, JUST DUE TO THE WAY THE STREETS WERE MADE. AND IF THIS IS PUTTING AN UNDUE BURDEN ON ANYONE BECAUSE IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN IN 20 YEARS, THE OTHER BUSINESSES AREN'T GOING TO BE TURNING OVER. AND IT'S MUCH. NO, I UNDERSTAND, AND THIS IS NOT EVEN LANDSCAPING ALONG A STREET.IT'S LANDSCAPE PLANTERS IN FRONT OF BUILDINGS, WHICH IS DIFFERENT THAN YOU HAVING A LANDSCAPE BUFFER, PUTTING TREES IN THAT BUFFER. THERE'S NO SPACE FOR THAT IN HERE, BUT THE PLANTERS WILL HELP TO BRING IN SOME BEAUTIFICATION. OKAY. THANK YOU. I'VE HAD TO DO THAT BEFORE.
THERE WAS AN OLD GAS STATION ZONE DOWN IN KAUFMAN THAT WAS ZONED BEFORE SUPREME COURT. EVEN CODIFIED ZONING LAWS, AND THEY ASKED US TO PUT PLANTERS OUT BY THE STREET AND EVERYTHING. AND IT LOOKS NICE. AND IT'S PROBABLY THREE WORDS. IT'S A START. SO I THINK THAT'S WHERE THAT COMES FROM. COMMISSIONER DUCKWORTH AND. THERE WE GO. WE SHOULD BE LIVE NOW. I'M SORRY, I THINK I THINK THE PLANNERS ARE HAVE BEEN COVERED. I THAT'S WHAT I WAS GOING TO BRING UP. OKAY. GOTCHA.
ALL RIGHT. I HAVE NO OTHER SPEAKERS TO REMIND. THE MOTION IS TO APPROVE THE SUB FOR A 25 YEAR TIME PERIOD WITH PLANTERS UP AGAINST THE BUILDING. NO MORE DISCUSSION. PLEASE VOTE, MR. ROBERTS. YES, SIR. WHO MADE THE SECOND COMMISSIONER? PARIS. IT'S STILL UP HERE IN THE MOTION THING. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER JONES MADE THE FIRST COMMISSIONER PARIS A SECOND.
THANK YOU. AND THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, NEXT ITEM ON
[d. Z 25-15 Crafton Communications Inc. (District 1)]
OUR AGENDA IS ITEM TWO. YEAH. 2DZ 25. DASH 15 CRAFT AND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF CRAFTON COMMUNICATIONS, INC, REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PROVISION FOR AN ANTENNA. COMMERCIAL USE A PLAN DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE A DEVIATION RELATED TO THE REQUIRED DISTANCE FROM A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BOUNDARY LINE, AND A CONCEPT PLAN FOR AN ANTENNA. COMMERCIAL USE. ON PROPERTY ZONED WITH THE BASE ZONING OF COMMUNITY OFFICE DISTRICT. THE SITE IS LOCATED AT 4413 NAAMAN SCHOOL. SO. SO JUST TO PREFACE THIS CASE, BACK IN FEBRUARY MARCH, OUR GDC HAD AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT STATING THAT ALL NONRESIDENTIAL ANTENNAS COMMERCIAL THEY HAVE TO DO AN S U P, AND IT ALSO WAIVED THE REQUIREMENT FOR BEING 5000FT■S R LINEAR FEET FROM ANOTHER TOWER.THAT JUST DOESN'T SHOW IN OUR CODE RIGHT NOW. THE APPLICANT'S REQUESTS A PD AMENDMENT AS WELL AS AN SP FOR 50 YEARS FOR THIS COMMERCIAL ANTENNA USE IS THAT A4413 NAAMAN SCHOOL ROAD? IT IS
[00:35:03]
A .22 ACRE SITE. HERE'S THE SITE. IT IS ZONED PLAN DEVELOPMENT 87 ONE FOR COMMUNITY OFFICE. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY THAT AS WELL AS AGRICULTURAL LAND. NOW, THE REASON IT'S NEEDING THE PD AMENDMENT IS FOR DISTANCE TO RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. AND THAT WOULD BE AGRICULTURAL THOUGH THIS AGRICULTURAL ZONING THAT IS ENTIRELY CITY OWNED AS WELL AS FLOODPLAIN AND UTILITY EASEMENT. SO IT IS NOT REALLY EVER GOING TO ACTUALLY BE RESIDENTIAL. THIS SITE IS ZONED FOR PARKS AND OPEN SPACE, PRIVATE SIGNALING THAT THE AREA IS LARGELY FLOODPLAIN.THERE ARE PHOTOS OF THE SITE. AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S QUITE LOW LYING EXCEPT FOR THE CORNER. AND THE APPLICANT REQUEST 50 YEARS. THE TIME PERIOD GUIDE RECOMMENDS 20 TO 30. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS 50 BECAUSE THE LEASE IS 50 YEARS. SO HERE IS THE CONCEPT PLAN. YOU CAN SEE THE ONE LITTLE PART OUTSIDE OF THE FLOODPLAIN AND THAT'S WHERE IT'S GOING TO GO. WE INITIALLY DISCUSSED POSSIBLY PUTTING A LANDMARK FOR GARLAND THERE, BUT AFTER DISCUSSION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS, THEY FELT THIS WASN'T A FEASIBLE PART WITH THE SIGN. BUT THE APPLICANT DID NEGOTIATE WITH US AND WAS OPEN TO IT. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH THE PROVISION THAT THERE'D BE A 120 FOOT REDUCTION, OR REDUCTION TO 120FT FROM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AS OPPOSED TO 200, WHICH IS REQUIRED. AND THAT WAS JUST BECAUSE WE FELT THAT WAS THE MINIMUM POSSIBLE DISTANCE, EVEN FOR ANY INTERPRETATION, FOR BEING NEAR THAT AGRICULTURAL ZONE. WE SENT OUT 20 LETTERS AND RECEIVED ZERO IN RETURN. I'M OPEN TO ANY AND ALL QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS CASE. COMMISSIONER PEARS, THEN COMMISSIONER DUCKWORTH, THANKS FOR TAKING US THROUGH THIS, THIS CASE. I HAVE A QUESTION ON STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION ON THE ACP I MAY HAVE OVERLOOKED. IF YOU AGREE WITH THE 100 YEAR ACP OR THERE ARE SOME RECOMMENDATIONS AROUND ANTENNAS, I BELIEVE, GO AHEAD. SORRY. NO NO WORRIES. I BELIEVE BEFORE OR IT MAY BE UPDATED, BUT JUST IF YOU CAN REMIND ME, I'VE SEEN WHERE IT'S BEEN A 30 YEAR PERIOD AND THEN 20, 20 AND 20 TO 30 YEAR. MY SECOND QUESTION AND THEN THE ACP GOES WITH THE LAND, RIGHT? CORRECT. SO THE ACP GOES WITH THE LAND. THE ACP TIME PERIOD GUIDE RECOMMENDS 20 TO 30 YEARS. THE APPLICANT'S RECOMMENDING 50. AND WE ARE IN SUPPORT OF THE 50 BECAUSE THEIR LEASE IS 50 YEARS FOR THIS LOCATION. AND IN GENERAL, PART OF OUR REASON FOR RECOMMENDING APPROVAL IS THAT AFTER TALKS WITH EVERY DEPARTMENT DEVELOPER, EVEN OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ON THE FLOOD STUDY, THAT WE FELT LIKE THERE WAS NO OTHER DEVELOPMENT POSSIBILITY FOR THIS SITE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND.
COMMISSIONER DUCKWORTH. THANK THE APPLICANT. I DIDN'T THINK WE'D EVER PUT ANYTHING THERE, SO AT LEAST WE'LL HAVE SOMETHING PRODUCTIVE QUESTION THAT RAN ACROSS MY MIND WHEN I WAS LOOKING AT THIS, AND I CAN'T MEASURE IT. BUT DO WE KNOW HOW TALL THE TOWER IS GOING TO BE? AND WOULD IT, IF IT FELL? WOULD IT EVER REACH A STREET? IF IT DID FALL TO THE WEST OR SOUTH, IT WOULD CERTAINLY HIT BRAND OR OR NAAMAN SCHOOL THERE, BUT IT'S AN 80 FOOT, 85 FOOT TOWER, WHICH IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE GDC. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND THOSE TOWERS ARE DESIGNED NOT TO COMPLETELY FALL OVER, BUT TO BREAK. SO YOU'RE PROBABLY LOOKING ABOUT HALF THE DISTANCE IT BREAKS AND DOES THAT OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER ROSEN? LET ME. YOU SHOULD HAVE GO. DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW LONG IT'S GOING TO TAKE TO REDEVELOP THE NAAMAN SCHOOL ROAD GOING FAR EAST? BECAUSE THAT MIGHT AFFECT THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY. MIGHT. YES. SO WHEN I DID MY SITE VISIT, I MEAN, IT DID SEEM LIKE THEY WERE COMING ALONG PRETTY WELL. BUT THAT WOULD BE A QUESTION FOR, YOU KNOW, OUR STREETS DEPARTMENT REALLY FOR THE TIMELINE ON THAT.
OKAY. THANKS. YEAH. THE ROAD APPEARS TO BE CURRENTLY IMPROVED ALMOST TO THE END OF THE SITE.
NOT QUITE. YEAH, THE SITE, I BELIEVE. LET ME SEE IF I CAUGHT IT IN MY PHOTOS, BUT IT REALLY DID TO MY MEMORY. UNFORTUNATELY, IT SEEMS MY PHOTOS DON'T PORTRAY IT, BUT IT FELT LIKE THE SITE, AREA AND CORNER THAT ACTUALLY BORDERS NAAMAN SCHOOL WAS ALL DONE WITH THE MOST OF THE WORK WAS MORE IN THAT LIKE WOODED REALLY FLOODPLAIN AREA TO THE EAST. AND SHOWING LIKE THE LOOK MAP HERE, LIKE IT'D BE OVER HERE IS WHERE IT WAS REALLY MOST OF THE WORK. WHILE THE SITES HERE, THE ONLY THING I WOULD ADD IN IS LOOKS LIKE THIS SITE ISN'T THAT WELL MAINTAINED RIGHT NOW, BUT WITH THIS OWNER COMING IN, THEY'LL BE THEY HAVE TO MAINTAIN IT. YES, SIR. AND THAT'LL BE
[00:40:02]
WRITTEN INTO THE. YES, SIR. AND JUST IN GENERAL, I DID WANT TO MENTION THAT JUST FOR THE GDC, THEY HAVE TO ADD LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING TO THIS TOWER, WHICH THEY WILL DO. OKAY. THANK YOU.YOU KNOW THE QUESTIONS. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? CARE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION OR. AND NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. GOOD EVENING. MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. I'M DOUG HENDERSON WITH CRAFTED COMMUNICATIONS, 5600 WEST LOVERS LANE, SUITE 116 NUMBER 382 DALLAS, TEXAS. ALSO HERE TONIGHT IS DAVID PREJEAN, CEO OF CRAFTON. CRAFTON IS REPRESENTING THE SITE DEVELOPER, WHO IS. WHICH COMMUNICATIONS TOWER GROUP I, LLC. AND. CTG HAS LEASEHOLD RIGHTS, AS YOU HEARD FOR THIS SITE, IT INCLUDES THE ENTIRE TRIANGLE THAT'S THERE.
AND IS TRIANGLE IS ABOUT 20,000FT■S. WITH THE MOST EASTERLY 12,000FT■S ALMOST COMPLETELY COVERED BY FLOODPLAIN AND FLOOD WAY. NOW WE ARE PLANNING TO DEVELOP 8000FT■S THT BORDERS BRAND. AND SO YOU SEE THE DEVELOPMENT THERE WHERE WE'VE GOT OUR COMPOUND AND THE.
DRIVEWAY AND TURNING RADIUS TO MEET YOUR CODE. IT'S ALSO SET BACK, AS YOU'LL NOTICE, 16FT FROM BOTH STREETS FOR LANDSCAPING. SO WE HAVE SQUEEZED EVERYTHING IN THERE TO BE JUST PERFECT. IT IS COMPLETELY OUTSIDE OF THE FLOODWAY AND THE FLOODPLAIN, AND WE HAVE NO INTENTION OF TOUCHING THAT FLOODPLAIN OR FLOODWAY. AND WE THINK THAT AS THEY CONTINUE TO DEVELOP THE STREAM IN THE PARKS THAT THEY'VE GOT FOR NEWMAN, SORRY, NAAMAN SCHOOL THAT OUR STUFF WILL BE COMPLETELY OUT OF THE WAY. THE PROPOSED 85 FOOT STEEL MONOPOLE WILL BE SERVING EVER GROWING DEMAND FOR VOICE AND DATA USES IN THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND THE INCREASED TRAFFIC VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IN THE AREA. WE SUPPORT THE FINDINGS PRESENTED BY YOUR VERY PROFESSIONAL PLANNING STAFF. WE WOULD LIKE TO ADD THAT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS BEFORE YOU ARE CONSISTENT WITH OUR REQUEST FOR THE SCP AND FOR THE PD CONDITIONS, PARTICULARLY THE SETBACK FROM THE AG ZONING NORTH OF OUR SITE. THAT ZONING DISTRICT, ABOUT 100FT NORTH OF THE STRUCTURE, IS CURRENTLY USED FOR RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE TOLLWAY AND A LITTLE PART OF THE OLD NAAMAN SCHOOL. I THINK IT'S VERY UNLIKELY THAT ANY RESIDENTIAL USES WILL EVER BE DEVELOPED ON TOP OF THESE RIGHTS OF WAY, AND WE'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. SURE. COMMISSIONER DALTON, BY THE WAY, WE'RE FOND OF OUR STAFF, TOO, SO THANK YOU. THERE ARE A BUNCH OF VERY GOOD PEOPLE. DO YOU HAVE CARRIERS ASSIGNED ALREADY? ONE TO ALL THREE, OR. I THINK THERE'S TWO CARRIERS. ONE, ONE. I KNOW IT'S A SHORT TOWER, SO IT'D BE REAL HARD TO PUT MORE THAN ONE CARRIER ON THERE. I JUST THINK, WELL, THAT'S RIGHT.
NOW WE HAVE DESIGNED THIS TO HANDLE THREE. AND WHICH WOULD THAT THAT WOULD BE ABOUT THE LIMIT. WELL SINCE ALL THEY'RE ALL THERE ARE THREE. SO. YEAH. YEAH. SO I JUST THINKING IT'S, IT'S FAIRLY SHORT TO SOME OF THE TOWERS. WE DO SEE WITH MULTI CARRIERS I WAS JUST KIND OF WONDERING OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. UNLESS IT'S IN A LOW AREA TOO. ALL RIGHT I SEE NO OTHER
[00:45:05]
QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING DOWN. I HAVE NO OTHER SPEAKER CARDS ON THIS ITEM. IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE WHO CARE TO SPEAK ON THIS CASE? SEEING NONE. COMMISSIONERS. MR. CHAIR, COMMISSIONER DALTON. YES. SECOND, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT. I APPRECIATE THE APPLICANT COMING IN THE PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT HE'S PLANNING ON BUILDING ON IS AN EXTREMELY DIFFICULT PIECE OF PROPERTY. I CANNOT SEE IT BEING USED FOR ANYTHING ELSE. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE FOR 50 YEARS. THE REQUEST. WOULD THAT INCLUDE THE DISTANCE DEVIATION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? YES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I HEARD A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DALTON TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION FOR 50 YEARS WITH THE REQUESTED DEVIATIONS. AND THE SECOND WAS FROM COMMISSIONER ROSE. ALL RIGHT.ANY DISCUSSION? I SEE, COMMISSIONER PATTERSON. COMMISSIONER JENKINS CHIMED IN TO MAKE MOTIONS, BUT HE BEAT YOU TO IT. BUT CONVERSATION FIRST. WE'LL GET USED TO THIS SYSTEM.
YEAH. YOU EVER KNOW ME TO DO ANYTHING LIKE I'M SUPPOSED TO KNOW? THE MOTION IS TO APPROVE.
IT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM 2EA GDC AMENDMENT,
[e. GDC Amendment ORD 25-06]
ORDINANCE 20 2-06. ALL THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER TWO ZONING REGULATIONS. ARTICLE TWO, DIVISION ONE APPLICATION FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING. SECTION 205 PROCESSING OF ZONING APPLICATION, PLAT PLAN AND DECISION, WHICH SETS A 30 DAY MAXIMUM PERIOD FOR EACH POSTPONEMENT OF A MUNICIPAL ACTION ON A PLAN OR PLAT. GOOD EVENING. WAITING FOR THE PRESENTATION TO LOAD. MY NAME IS MICHAEL WADE. I'M PLANNING ADMINISTRATOR FOR LONG RANGE PLANNING. PLEASED TO BE WITH YOU TONIGHT. SO YES, TODAY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2506. REGARDING THE 30 DAY POSTPONEMENT TIMELINE. THIS IS VERY SMALL UTILITARIAN TYPE OF CHANGE, JUST BRINGING US INTO ALIGNMENT WITH STATE LAW. SO PROPOSING TO REMOVE THE 30 DAY MAXIMUM PERIOD FOR EACH POSTPONEMENT OF MUNICIPAL ACTION ON A PLAN FROM SECTION 2.05. AGAIN, JUST ALIGNING OUR GARLAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WITH STATE LAW.UNTIL RECENTLY, THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIRED THAT A PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE OR DENY A PLAN OR PLAT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE APPLICATION IS RECEIVED BY STAFF, AND THEN ALSO SET A MAXIMUM TIME PERIOD OF 30 DAYS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION COULD POSTPONE A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THAT PLAN OR PLAT. IN 2023, THE STATE REMOVED THESE 30 DAY SHOT CLOCK REQUIREMENTS FROM PLANS, SO THEY STILL ARE REQUIRED FOR PLATS. HOWER, WE'RE JUST ALIGNING OUR GARLAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WITH STATE LAW IN THIS EFFECT. SO IN FEBRUARY 2025, THERE WAS AN ORDINANCE, AMENDMENT 2502 GOING MOST OF THE WAY. AND THTHIS I JUST COMPLETING THAT EFFORT. YOU DON'T HAVE TO READ THIS. THIS IS IN YOUR PACKET. I'M JUST SHOWING. I CAN'T EVEN READ THIS.
THIS IS JUST SHOWING THAT THERE IS SORT OF A FORMAT CHANGE TO THE LANGUAGE. THIS IS JUST BRINGING OUR CODE AGAIN TO LOOK LIKE STATE STATE CODE AND REALLY REMOVE ANY AMOUNT OF SPACE BETWEEN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE. ALSO, YOU'LL SEE IN BLUE A COUPLE OF REFERENCE CHANGES. INSTEAD OF 2.05 F9, IT'S 2.05 G7. THAT'S JUST CORRECTING AN ERROR THAT WAS IN THE PACKET. AND WITH THAT, STAFF RECOMMEND APPROVAL. AND WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONER JENKINS, AND THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE TEXT, PLEASE? FORGIVE ME. IT READS AS IF. SO, WE LOST IT. SORRY, I HATE TO USE WHAT WE'VE GOT IN THE PACKET BECAUSE WE'VE ALREADY SAID THE PACKETS COMPLETELY WRONG. RIGHT. OKAY. WE'VE GOT 2.05 G7 THAT SAYS IN ORDER TO POSTPONE THE DECISION, YOU'VE GOT TO DO EVERYTHING IN A AT THE END OF A, WE HAVE SUBSECTION TWO THAT SAYS OR. RIGHT. SO EITHER THEY CAN DO EVERYTHING IN A OR B AND THEN C KIND OF HANGS. IS THERE A WAY THAT WE CAN I DON'T KNOW. IS THAT IS THAT JUST ME. AND I GUESS THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. WE'RE IT LOOKS LIKE WE'RE ADDING AN ADDITIONAL CONDITION OR WE HAVE A SERIES OF CONDITIONS WITH NO CLEAR STOP. ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ITEM C? YEAH. SO WE'VE GOT
[00:50:02]
STATE. THAT'S WHAT THE STATE LAW DID AT NOT THIS SESSION, BUT THE ONE BEFORE BECAUSE CITIES WERE ASKING SOME CITIES NOT GARLAND WERE ASKING APPLICANTS. WELL HERE, SIGN THIS AND WAIVE THE TIMELINE. I THINK THAT'S WHAT THAT'S DIRECTLY I'M WONDERING IF THAT SHOULD BE 2.058. THIS IS HOW IT'S WRITTEN IN STATE LAW. WE'RE TRYING TO KIND OF CAPTURE HOWEVER IT IS IN THE STATE LAW.SO A COUPLE THINGS I WANT TO KIND OF CLARIFY IT. YES, THERE WAS AN ERROR IN THE PACKET, BUT WE WERE REFLECTING HOW IT'S CURRENTLY SHOWING ON CODE, UNFORTUNATELY E CODE HADN'T UPDATED OUR FEBRUARY AMENDMENT, SO THAT'S WHY THE REFERENCES WERE A LITTLE MESSED UP. AND HERE WE'RE TRYING TO REFLECT THE TRUE REFERENCES. THAT WOULD BE POST FEBRUARY 2025. THAT'S WHY THERE'S A CONFUSION. IT'S NOT TRULY AN ERROR. IT'S REALLY THE REFERENCE ISSUE IS AN ISSUE OF CODE NOT UPDATING THE TEXT POST FEBRUARY 2025. SO THAT'S ONE THING. ON THE OTHER PIECE, I UNDERSTAND THE CONFUSION KIND OF IS IT A OR B OR C? IS THAT THE QUESTION? IT IS IF A BOTH OF 1 OR 2 IF THOSE HAPPENS OR B OR OR C. THAT'S HOW I READ IT. BUT IT'S ALL RELATED TO PLATS. NO, I UNDERSTAND I'M WITH YOU AND YOU'RE IT SOUNDS LIKE WE'RE WE'RE STARTING TO KIND OF MEET IN THE MIDDLE HERE. IF I READ THIS AND I GO 3030 DAY PERIOD DESCRIBED BY THAT SUBSECTION FOR ONE OR MORE PERIODS EACH, NOT TO EXCEED 30 DAYS. IF AND I'M JUST READING, SEE IF THE CITY MAY NOT REQUEST A REQUIRED APPLICANT TO WAIVE A PLAT DEADLINE. IT'S. OH, SO YOU'RE MAKING SENSE. THAT'S HOW THAT'S HOW THE STATE HAD WRITTEN IT. BUT WE DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE TO COMPLETELY COPY IT. IT DOES. IF IT DOESN'T MAKE FULLY FULL SENSE, WE CAN CREATE ANOTHER, NOT MAKE IT A SUBSECTION OF THAT. IF AND THEN YEAH, YEAH WE CAN DO THAT. 2 OR 5. OH YEAH. YEAH YEAH WE CAN CLARIFY THAT FOR SURE. BUT WHAT I TRULY WANT TO MENTION THIS IS REMOVING A RESTRICTION ON PLANNED COMMISSION, HAVING TO STICK TO 30 DAYS FOR ZONING PLANS. THAT'S TRULY IT'S ENABLING YOU TO BE ABLE TO POSTPONE A CASE EVEN WHEN THERE IS A CONCEPT PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH IT, BECAUSE THE STATE ALLOWS US TO DO IT. WE KIND OF HAVE BEEN DOING IT AS NEEDED, BUT WE WANTED TO UPDATE OUR CODE TO MAKE SURE THE CODE IS IN ALIGNMENT OF YOUR PRACTICE AND POLICIES. YOU'RE GOOD. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH. IF WE JUST THINK THERE WAS SOME CONFUSION FOR ME TOO. AND IT TOOK A PHONE CALL TO CLEAR IT UP. FOR INSTANCE, IN THE NOTIFICATION HERE, IT SAYS ON A PLAN OR PLAT, WE'LL NEED TO REMOVE PLAN WHEN IT GOES TO COUNCIL. WE SELL OFF A PLANNER PLAT IS HOW IT WAS BEING WRITTEN. LIKE WAS SHOWING ON CODE. IN OUR LAST AMENDMENT, WE HAD TAKEN OUT PLAT AND THAT'S AND THAT'S PART OF WHAT CONFUSED ME BECAUSE I WENT WENT TO THERE AND I START ASKING QUESTIONS AND THAT CONFUSED THAT WAS CONFUSING US TOO. BUT BECAUSE WE WERE THINKING, OH, IT'S BEEN WITH THE ORDINANCE IS POSTED ON CODE, BUT THE TEXT WASN'TT REFLECTING IT. SO WE'RE GOING TO FIGURE IT OUT WHY IT'S NOT BEING REFLECTED ON THE TEXT, BUT THAT'S WHY THE CONFUSION HAPPENED. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. IT SOUNDS LIKE WE CAN DO THIS INDEFINITELY, WHICH OF COURSE CERTAINLY HAS ITS BENEFIT, I'M GUESSING. WHAT ARE THE WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL CONS OF BEI ABLE TO INDEFINITELY POSTPONE OR, YOU KNOW, A POTENTIAL PLAN AND WILL WE IS THERE A COUNT I GUESS, WILL WE BE NOTIFIED OR WILL WE KNOW HOW MANY TIMES IT'S BEEN POSTPONED OR SO? GENERALLY SPEAKING, THINGS THAT COME BEFORE YOU ARE GOING TO BE PLANS RELATED TO ZONING, CONCEPT PLANS AND SOME INSTANCES DETAIL PLANS WITH THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN, THINGS LIKE THAT. SO THOSE BECAUSE THERE'S NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT WITH IT, WE ALWAYS RECOMMEND UNLESS IT'S ONE ONCE IN A BLUE MOON WE CAN HAVE THOSE SITUATION WHERE THE CASE IS COMPLETELY IS TAKING A DIFFERENT ROUTE. THAT'S WHY IT NEEDS TO BE STPONED INDEFINITELY. BUT 99% OF THE TIMES WE WILL ADVISE AGAINST AN INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT. AND THERE ARE TWO REASONS THERE HAS TO BE A DUE PROCESS. THERE HAS TO BE A CERTAIN TIMELINE FOR THE APPLICANT TO EXPECT AN OUTCOME OF THEIR APPLICANT. BUT THE MORE CRITICAL PIECE IS ONCE WE NOTIFY IF PLANNED COMMISSION POSTPONE TO A DATE CERTAIN THAT RELEASES US FROM THE BURDEN OF NOTIFYING
[00:55:06]
AGAIN BECAUSE THE IDEA IS THAT, HEY, IT'S BEEN NOTIFIED THE PUBLIC'S FOLLOWING THE MEETING SO THEY KNOW WHEN THE ITEM IS COMING BACK TO PLAN COMMISSION. BUT IF IT'S NOT POSTPONED TO A DATE CERTAIN, THEN THE BURDEN FALLS ONTO STAFF AGAIN TO NOTIFY THE SAME AMOUNT OF PEOPLE 100, 200, 501 MORE TIME. HUGE USE OF YOUR RESOURCES. CORRECT. AND SOMETIMES THAT IS THAT IS NEEDED. FOR EXAMPLE, WE HAD ONE CASE TODAY, THE 136 LAVON DRIVE. THE APPLICANT DECIDED THAT, OH, WE NEED TO ADD THE SIDE SIGN TO THIS VARIANCE REQUEST, BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT WE HAD NOTIFIED IT FOR. SO NOW WE HAVE TO NOTIFY IT. SO THERE ARE INSTANCES WHERE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DO IT.BUT FOR POSTPONEMENT WE'LL ALWAYS RECOMMEND THAT YOU POSTPONE IT TO A DATE CERTAIN TO AVOID THAT SITUATION. SO THERE PROBABLY WILL NOT COME A SITUATION WHERE YOU'RE POSTPONING SOMETHING INDEFINITELY. AND BESIDES OUR OUR BYLAWS OF THE COMMISSION REQUIRE DATE CERTAIN. I GUESS MY QUESTION WAS A LITTLE UNCLEAR. WE CAN POSTPONE TO A DATE.
CERTAIN ANY AN IMMEASURABLE NUMBER OF TIMES IS KIND OF WE CAN WE CAN DO THAT IN THE PAST AFTER A COUPLE TIMES. AND YOU LOOK AT WHERE THE POSTPONEMENT STEMS FROM, WHETHER IT'S THE APPLICANT OR WHATEVER, YOU GO, NO, LET'S GO AHEAEAD AND HEAR I. I HAVEN'T SEEN IT GONE ON. AND YOU'VE BEEN HERE, COMMISSIONER DALTON, I THINK TWICE, MAYBE, MAYBE THREE WITHIN THE PAST 20 YEARS. BUT USUALLY IT'S ONE AND IT'S FOR A DISTINCTIVE PURPOSE. AND IF THEY HAVEN'T DONE THEIR PURPOSE, WE CALL IT ANYHOW. ALS, TO ADD ON TO THE ANSWER AND STAFF'S EXPERIENCE, VERY OFTEN IN OTHER STATES. AND I THINK THIS WAS THE PROMPTING FOR THE 2018 ORIGINAL HOUSE BILL AMENDMENT THAT APPLIED THE 30 DAY TIMELINE TO EVERYTHING. THERE WILL BE 1 OR 2 MAJOR CASES WHERE THERE IS A PLANNING COMMISSION THAT'S ACTING UNSCRUPULOUSLY, AND THEY USE THEY USE IT AS A TOOL TO EFFECTIVELY DENY. JUST LET SOMETHING DIE. NOT THIS COMMISSION. I WILL POINT THAT OUT. IT'S NOT THIS COMMISSION HASN'T BEEN THIS COMMISSION.
HOWEVER, THIS WAS ANOTHER ONE OF THOSE SITUATIONS, I THINK, WHERE ONE THING HAPPENED, WENT UP TO THE STATE LAW AND CAME BACK DOWN ON EVERYBODY, PROBABLY INAPPROPRIATELY. SO I DON'T THINK IT NEEDS TO APPLY FOR US. AND KIND OF A STATEMENT OF PERSONAL POLICY ON OUR ABILITY TO POSTPONE THAT. IT SHOULD BE USED AS A SCALPEL, NOT A HAMMER, AND THAT IT SHOULD BE USED AS RARELY AS POSSIBLE. BUT IT CAN BE AN EFFECTIVE TOOL IN CERTAIN CASES. ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE? OH, AND BE PREPARED. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE MORE STUFF LIKE THIS COMING THROUGH BECAUSE THE STATE JUST MET AND THEY MESSED WITH A BUNCH OF THINGS IN THE ZONING SYSTEM. SO BE PREPARED FOLKS.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SORRY. CLARIFICATION FOR THE YES, COMMISSIONER PARISH. YOU'RE LIVE NOW. DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION? I WAS JUST GOING TO ASK. JUST TO RESTATE, I WANT TO CLARIFY WHAT THE EDIT IS THAT YOU'RE REQUESTING. WE WENT AROUND. AROUND. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I'M CLEAR. YOU'RE REQUESTING FOR SECTION C TO BE NOT IN THERE DATED. OKAY. I JUST WANTED TO. CLEAR. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MR. WELL, YEAH, I WOULD MAKE THAT AS A S SGESTION AND LET THE LEGAL LEGAL DEPARTMENT FIGURE THAT ONE OUT. BUT BEFORE WE DO ANY OF THAT, I HAVE TO ASK OF ALL THE PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO'S JUST DYING TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE, IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING. OKAY. DID YOU DID YOU WANT TO CRAFT A. I THINK WE'RE ALL LOOKING TO YOU. DID YOU WANT TO CRAFT A MOTION? COMMISSIONER JENKINS? CERTAINLY, MR. CHAIR, IT'S SURE I MAKE A MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH THE CONDITION THAT SECTION 2.0 7G7 IS AMENDED SUCH THAT THE C SUBPARAGRAPH IS THE INDENTATION IS DECREASED SO THAT IT BECOMES ITS OWN PARAGRAPH OR OWN SUBSECTION. I KNEW WHAT THAT MEANT. IT SOUNDS GOOD. SOUNDS GREAT. WE HAVE A MOTION. DO I HEAR A SECOND? IS THERE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER OR COMMISSIONER ALREADY? OKAY, OKAY. AND ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CHANGE WITH THE INDENTATION OF WHATEVER IT WAS.
AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PARIS. AND THAT'S WHY WE RECORD THESE THINGS. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. LET'S VOTE. AND THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ALL RIGHT. ITEM
[01:00:16]
THREE IS ACTUALLY JUST AN INFORMATIONAL ITEM. SO THERE'S NO ACTION TO BE TAKEN THERE. AND SINCE THAT WAS THE LAST ITEM IN OUR AGENDA AND IT IS NOW 730. SO UNTIL OUR MEETING OF JULY 14TH, WE ARE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU.* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.