Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:11]

GOOD MORNING AND WELCOME TO OUR SPECIAL BUDGET SESSION. TODAY IS SATURDAY, AUGUST 16TH AND WE'RE HAVING A SPECIAL BUDGET SESSION WORKSHOP FOR THE GARLAND CITY COUNCIL. OUR FIRST ITEM ON OUR

[ PUBLIC COMMENTS]

AGENDA IS PUBLIC COMMENTS. MADAM SECRETARY, DO WE HAVE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO SIGNED UP TO SPEAK? WE DO. ALL RIGHT. WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR FIRST SPEAKER FOR US, PLEASE, MR. DUCKWORTH? YES. YOU KNOW THE PROCEDURE. NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, SIR, AND YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES. THANK YOU, MAYOR, FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY. MY NAME IS BOB DUCKWORTH, 909 WAKEFIELD DRIVE, GARLAND, TEXAS. AND I'M HERE THIS MORNING TO PRIMARILY SPEAK, JOKING WITH KRIS ABOUT LOOKING AT THE BUDGET. I WENT THROUGH THE BUDGET PRETTY CLOSELY AND BUT MY ONE OF MY CONCERNS IS, IS FOR THE GENERAL, FOR THE CITIZENS, THE TAXPAYERS OF GARLAND. AND WE HAVE A PROGRAM IN OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT CALLED THE SRO PROGRAM. LAST YEAR I RAISED SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT, AND I'M SURPRISED THIS YEAR THERE'S NOT ONE WORD IN THIS REPORT THAT SPEAKS TO THE SRO PROGRAM. IT'S ROUGHLY 7% OF OUR STAFF, AND IT'S 5 OR $6 MILLION OF OUR BUDGET. WHEN YOU CARVE THOSE NUMBERS OUT. EXCUSE ME, I'M GOING TO READ. AND I ALSO ASKED FOR AN AUDIT OF THE SRO PROGRAM AND MET WITH THE AUDIT COMMITTEE. AND AT THE CONCLUSION OF THAT MEETING, GOOD INTERNAL AUDITORS SUMMARIZED THAT MEETING AND SAID, THIS IS GOING TO GO THROUGH THE BUDGET PROCESS. THE CHIEF IS GOING TO PROVIDE THE DETAILS FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO MAKE APPROPRIATE AMENDMENTS OR CHANGES TO THE CONTRACT OR THE MOU. I FIND NOTHING ABOUT THAT IN THIS REPORT. AS WE KNOW THE SCHOOL. WE ALL KNOW THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REIMBURSES US FOR SOME OF THIS PROGRAM. MY CONCERN IS, IS HOW MUCH OF OUR TAX DOLLARS ARE WE USING TO PROVIDE THAT SERVICES OF THOSE 35 PEOPLE, AND HOW MUCH ARE WE RECOVERING FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT TO REIMBURSE OUR TAXPAYERS FOR THAT AMOUNT OF MONEY? AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU. I WOULD LIKE FOR ME AND I WOULD LIKE FOR THE PUBLIC TO SEE THOSE NUMBERS. THEY SHOULD BE FAIRLY EASY TO PUT TOGETHER. THE AUDIT HAS A MUCH MORE DETAILED REPORT IN IT. THE 21 AUDIT THAT I LOOKED AT HAS MUCH MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IN IT THAN I'VE EVER SEEN IN THE BUDGET, AND THAT WOULD BE SO SIMPLE TO PUT IN HERE. I'M ASSUMING THAT THAT GOING FORWARD, THAT THE CHIEF WILL BRING THAT INFORMATION THAT WAS DISCUSSED IN THE AUDIT COMMITTEE THAT WAS INDICATED, WILL BE BROUGHT FORWARD TO THIS COUNCIL FOR YOU TO LOOK AT. PERSONALLY, I THINK THAT MOU SHOULD BE LOOKED AT TO DETERME WHAT COST THE CITY IS, IS INVOLVED, WHAT IS INVOLVED IN THAT PROGRAM FROM A COST STANDPOINT AND WHAT IS RECOVERABLE FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR PROVIDING THAT SERVICE. ON PAGE 409 OF YOUR BUDGET, IT SAYS REGARDLESS OF HOW ALTERNATIVE POLICY AND PROGRAM CHOICES ARE IDENTIFIED AND CONSIDERED, THE NUTS AND BOLTS FRAMEWORK OF THE BUDGET MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN SUCH A WAY THAT IT CAN BE ANALYZED.

THIS PROGRAMAN'T BE ANALYZED IN THIS BUDGET. YET YOU SAY THAT'S THE PROCESS HERE. SO I WOULD I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU, COUNCIL, TO GET SOME INFORMATION, INFORMATION ON THAT. LOOK AT I HAVE I LOVE OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT. I LOVE OUR POLICE OFFICER. I LOVE EVERYTHING THEY DO. THIS IS A MATTER OF DOLLARS AND CENTS. AND I WANT YOU AS OUR COUNCIL TO MAKE SURE IT'S BEING PRUDENTLY HANDLED AS AS A PROGRAM. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. MADAM SECRETARY, DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS SIGNED UP? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. MR. DUCKWORTH, WE HAVE ONE QUESTION FOR YOU. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. YES, SIR. GOOD MORNING. THANK YOU.

HAVE YOU LOOKED AT THE BUDGET? YOU HAVEN'T. THEY DON'T PROVIDE AS MUCH INFORMATION AS THE CITY DOES. HOW DO YOU KNOW IF YOU HAVEN'T LOOKED AT IT? I DON'T KNOW WHAT. HOW DO YOU KNOW IF YOU HAVEN'T LOOKED AT IT? HOW DO I KNOW WHAT? WHAT THE ISSUES. WHAT? WHAT DID I SAY THAT YOU WANT ME TO ANSWER? YOU SAID LOOK AT THE BUDGET. LOOK AT YOUR BUDGET, NOT THE SCHOOL BUDGET. I

[00:05:01]

ASK YOU, I KNOW YOU TALK ABOUT OUR BUDGET. MY QUESTION IS, HAVE YOU LOOKED AT THE SCHOOL BUDGET? I LOOKED OVER IT. I HAVEN'T STUDIED IT AS MUCH AS I HAVE THE CITY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANSWER MY QUESTION. THANK YOU, THANK YOU SIR. ALL RIGHT THEN WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR FIRST

[1. Overview of FY26 Proposed Budget and navigating the budget document presentation]

ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS THE OVERVIEW OF THE FY 26 PROPOSED BUDGET AND NAVIGATING THE BUDGET DOCUMENT PRESENTATION, MR. CITY MANAGER. GOOD MORNING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, WE'RE EXCITED TO BE HERE WITH YOU THIS MORNING TO TAKE A DEEP DIVE INTO OUR PROPOSED FISCAL 2026 BUDGET. I DO WANT TO RECOGNIZE THE BUDGET TEAM, ALLISON AND HER HER BUDGET TEAM, MANY OF WHICH ARE HERE TODAY FOR THEIR WORK IN PREPARING THE BUDGET FOR THIS YEAR. AND THEN ALSO MATT AND HIS TEAM FOR THE WORK THAT THEY DO. SO MUCH BEHIND THE SCENES GOES INTO THE 481 PAGES THAT MAKE UP OUR BUDGET. AND THEN, OF COURSE, OUR DEPARTMENT HEADS, OUR DIRECTORS THAT SPEND A LOT OF TIME EARLY ON IN THE YEAR PREPING THEIR BUDGETS FOR CONSIDERATION. COUNCIL. WE HAVE A LOT OF INFORMATION TO PRESENT TODAY. THIS IS FOR YOU. THIS IS YOUR TIME. AND SO WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS. AND IF WE CAN'T ANSWER THEM HERE TODAY WE WILL FOLLOW UP. WE HE SUBSEQUENT BUDGET MEETINGS PLANNED AND PROPOSED. AND SO IF WE CAN'T ANSWER IT TODAY, WE'LL CERTAINLY FOLLOW UP AND PROVIDE RESPONSES TO YOUR QUESTIONS. IF YOU LEAVE HERE TODAY AND YOU THINK OF SOMETHING THAT YOU FORGOT TO ASK, OR AS YOU CONTINUE TO GO THROUGH THE BUDGET, IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, PLEASE REACH OUT. BEST WAY TO DO THAT, AND WHAT WE'VE TYPICALLY DONE IN THE PAST IS SEND MYSELF AN EMAIL OR ALLISON AN EMAIL, AND WE'LL ADD THAT TO OUR LIST OF FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS FOR BUDGET CONSIDERATION, AND EITHER RESPOND IN WRITING OR AT ONE OF OUR UPCOMING BUDGET MEETINGS. EITHER WAY, IT'S YOUR PREFERENCE WE DO HAVE ON OUR WORK SESSION AGENDA FOR MONDAY, A FOLLOW UP MEETING. AND SO THERE THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL TIME IF THERE'S ANY FOLLOW UP FROM THIS MEETING OR BETWEEN NOW AND MONDAY, WE WILL BE PREPARED TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AT THE WORK SESSION ON MONDAY AS WELL. MYSELF, ALLISON AND MATT ARE GOING TO BE TAG TEAMING KIND OF THIS UP FRONT PART OF THE OF THE PRESENTATION TODAY, BUT YOU'RE ALSO GOING TO BE HEARING FROM SEVERAL OF OUR DEPARTMENTS.

YOU'LL NOTICE THAT THE LINEUP IS A LITTLE BIT LIGHTER THIS YEAR FOR A LOT OF REASONS, MOST OF WHICH IS THAT NOT A LOT OF CHANGE TO THE BUDGET THIS YEAR. YOU'LL SEE THAT ESPECIALLY IN THE GENERAL FUND, THINGS ARE TIGHT. AND AS FAR AS NEW PROPOSALS, NEW SERVICES, NEW PEOPLE, THEY'RE VERY FEW AND LIMITED AND FAR BETWEEN. SO WITH THAT, I'M GOING TO JUMP IN SOME OF THIS UPFRONT STUFF YOU'RE GOING TO RECOGNIZE FROM MY PRESENTATION A WEEK OR SO AGO WHEN WE INTRODUCED THE BUDGET AND PROVIDED IT FIRST TO COUNCIL. AND SO I'LL PROBABLY NOT SPEAK IN GREAT DETAIL ON THOSE THINGS, BUT I'LL BE TAGGING BACK IN OVER, OVER TIME FOR SOME OF THE SLIDES. AND LIKE I SAID, WE'RE ALL GOING TO SHARE IN THIS THIS MORNING. SO I DID WANT TO START OUT WITH KIND OF OUR BUDGET PRIORITIES AND CONSIDERATIONS. AND I'VE MENTIONED BEFORE COUNCIL THAT THIS IS A BRIDGE YEAR, PARTICULARLY FOR THE GENERAL FUND WHERE WE STARTED OUT IN A IN A IN THE RED AND WORKED OUR WAY OUT IN ORDER TO MEET SOME OF THE NEEDS THAT ARE THAT WERE RECOGNIZED WITHIN THE BUDGET. WE'RE ALSO FOCUSING ON PREPARING FOR A TAX RATE SWAP ELECTION IN NOVEMBER 2026. I KNOW WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THAT FOR QUITE A WHILE NOW, INCLUDING LAST YEAR'S DURING LAST YEAR'S BUDGET PROCESS. AND SO IN ORDER TO BRIDGE TO THAT FISCAL 2027 BUDGET IN NOVEMBER 26TH ELECTION, WE'RE REALLY LIMITING SPENDING IN THE GENERAL FUND, AND WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH IN DETAIL SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE ARE PROPOSING TO USE ONE TIME DOLLARS FOR IN THE GENERAL FUND THIS YEAR IN ORDER TO BRIDGE TO THAT NOVEMBER 2026 ELECTION. LONG TERM, WE'RE REALLY LOOKING TO BUILD SOME ADDITIONAL SUSTAINABILITY INTO OUR EXISTING FUNDS. AND I'M GOING TO TALK SPECIFICALLY AGAIN ABOUT GROUP HEALTH AND SOME OF THE CHALLENGES THAT WE'RE FACING THERE. WITH THE HEALTH BENEFITS THAT WE PROVIDE OUR EMPLOYEES. THAT'S ONE IN PARTICULAR THAT'S HIGH ON MY RADAR IN TERMS OF MAKING SURE THAT WE HAVE A SUSTAINABLE PROGRAM THAT CAN BE FUNDED OVER TIME AND THAT WE REALLY LIMIT THE GROWTH OF EXPENSES IN. NEXT SLIDE. AND OF COURSE, AS WE GO THROUGH THE BUDGET, ALWAYS LOOKING TO ALIGN ANYTHING THAT ANY BUDGET DECISIONS AND PROPOSALS WITH OUR STRATEGIC INITIATIVES IN THE GPS, THAT'S ALWAYS IN MIND AS WELL. I DID WANT TO SPEND JUST A

[00:10:01]

MINUTE TO TALK ABOUT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OUR OPERATING BUDGET AND OUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET. YOU'LL RECOGNIZE AND REMEMBER, COUNCIL, THAT THAT WE HAVE TWO SEPARATE PROCESSES FOR REVIEW FOR EACH OF THESE TWO, FOR EACH OF THESE TWO BUDGETS. WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT RIGHT NOW IS, IS THE OPERATING BUDGET. THIS IS THIS IS PEOPLE AND PROGRAMS VERSUS ONE TIME EXPENSES ON EQUIPMENT AND BOND PROGRAMS AND BUILDING THINGS, WHICH ARE REALLY WITHIN THE CIP. AND SO INEVITABLY AND IT'S A QUESTION IS GOING TO COME UP ABOUT A CIP PROGRAM OR PROJECT, AND WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. BUT RIGHT NOW WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS THE OPERATING BUDGET, WHICH RUNS ON A FISCAL YEAR FROM OCTOBER THROUGH SEPTEMBER AND IS FUNDED THROUGH TAXES AND FEES, VERSUS IN THE CIP. THOSE ARE ALL DEBT FUNDED PROJECTS THAT ARE GENERATED BY TAXES AND FEES AND ULTIMATELY TIE BACK TO RATEPAYERS OR TAXPAYERS, BUT ARE ISSUED THROUGH DEBT AND PAID FOR THROUGH DEBT. I DID WANT TO NOTE THAT WE HAVE, WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF A OF A CONSULTANT, WE'VE BEEN USING AND WORKING THROUGH WITH STAFF COUNCIL. WE ARE PLANNING TO MERGE THESE TWO PROCESSES INTO ONE PROCESS, AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT AS A TARGET FOR FISCAL 28. THIS IS GOING TO TAKE CONSIDERABLE TIME TO KIND OF MERGE THESE TWO PROCESSES. THERE'S A LOT OF BEHIND THE SCENES WORK THAT GOES INTO THIS, AND IN PART WHY WE'VE HAD SEPARATE PROCESSES IS THAT IT TAKES A LOT OF STAFF EFFORT TO PUT TOGETHER, YOU KNOW, THESE NOT JUST THE DOCUMENTS THEMSELVES, BUT THE AMOUNT OF RESEARCH AND PREPARATION TIME THAT GOES INTO BOTH OF THESE, BOTH OF THESE BUDGETS IS VERY CONSIDERABLE. AND SO IT'S GOING TO TAKE SOME TIME FOR US TO WORK THROUGH THAT. YOU MIGHT ASK, WELL, WHY WHY WOULDN'T WE DO IT NEXT YEAR? YOU'LL RECALL THAT IF WE'RE GOING TO PREPARE FOR A NOVEMBER 2026 ELECTION, WHICH IS FISCAL 27, WE BASICALLY HAVE TO START OUR OPERATING BUDGET PROCESS ABOUT A MONTH EARLY. AND SO WITH THAT, WE REALLY DIDN'T WANT TO THROW ON TOP OF THAT, ANOTHER OVERLAPPING CIP BUDGET PREPARATION. AND SO WE'RE GOING TO TARGET FOR FISCAL 28 TO MERGE THESE TWO PROCESSES AND BRING THEM TOGETHER. ONE OF THE BIG BENEFITS I SEE IN DOING THAT IS THAT THE TAXES AND FEES THAT YOU ESTABLISH IN THE OPERATING BUDGET ULTIMATELY ARE WHAT FUND THE CIP. AND SO HAVING A CONVERSATION ABOUT BOTH AT THE SAME TIME REALLY MAKES SENSE, AND I THINK WILL HELP TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATION AT THE SAME TIME FOR US TO MAKE THE BEST DECISIONS BOTH ON THE OPERATING SIDE AND ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SIDE. SO I DID WANT TO JUST TAKE A MINUTE TO NOTE THAT AND, AND KIND OF POINT OUT THE DIFFERENCE AND THEN TALK ABOUT OUR PLANS IN THE FUTURE TO BRING THOSE TWO PROGRAMS TOGETHER. THIS YEAR, OUR CONSOLIDATED BUDGET. SO THIS IS ALL OF THE DIFFERENT FUNDS TOGETHER, INCLUDING OUR GENERAL FUND, OUR UTILITY, ELECTRIC, WATER, WASTEWATER, ALL OF OUR ENTERPRISE FUNDS, SANITATION, ALL OF THOSE CONSOLIDATED TOGETHER ARE JUST LAST YEAR, I THINK WE WERE JUST SHY OF A BILLION. WE'RE AT ABOUT 1.1 BILLION NOW, AN OVERALL INCREASE OF 32.8 MILLION ON THE GENERAL FUND. WE ARE PROPOSING AN INCREASE OF 10.3 MILLION. THAT PUTS US UP TO 257.2 MILLION.

LOOKING CLOSER AT SOME OF OUR OUR SORT OF FIVE BIGGEST FUNDS SHARED THIS BEFORE AS WE INTRODUCED THE BUDGET. YOU CAN SEE WHAT THE TOTAL BUDGET AMOUNTS ARE FOR EACH OF THESE DIFFERENT FUNDS AND WHAT THE FUND BALANCE REQUIREMENTS ARE, AND OUR OUR FUND BALANCE GOALS AND WHAT THE PROPOSED RESERVES WOULD BE AT THE END OF FISCAL 26. SO THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT WE ARE IN GOOD SHAPE WHEN IT COMES TO OUR FUND BALANCE REQUIREMENTS AND GOALS. I DID WANT TO NOTE, YOU'LL NOTICE ON ELECTRIC WATER WASTEWATER THAT THOSE PROPOSED RESERVES ARE HIGHER, SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER, I SHOULD SAY, THAN OUR FUND BALANCE GOALS. AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS THE VOLATILITY IN THOSE FUNDS IS MORE CONSIDERABLE. AND BUT PARTICULARLY ON THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SIDE, WHY WE HAVE EXTRA DAYS OF RESERVES THERE IS THAT AND I THINK THIS HAS BEEN COUNCIL'S PREFERENCE OVER TIME IS RATHER THAN RATHER THAN COME IN WITH A, YOU KNOW, SAY A 2% INCREASE TO OUR RATES IN ONE YEAR AND THEN NEXT THE FOLLOWING YEAR WHEN WE HAVE A LOT OF DEBT THAT WE'RE GOING TO ISSUE, COME IN WITH A 15 OR 20% INCREASE. WE TRY TO SMOOTH THAT OUT OVER TIME, WHICH MEANS THAT AT TIMES WE ARE GOING TO ACCUMULATE FUND BALANCE SO THAT WE CAN LATER

[00:15:02]

DRAW THAT DOWN AND SMOOTH OUT THE RATE INCREASES THAT WE THAT WE TAKE TO OUR RESIDENTS. SO THAT'S KIND OF WHAT YOU SEE HAPPENING THERE. AND JUST WANTED TO NOTE THAT BECAUSE YOU'RE PROBABLY THINKING, HOLY COW, WE'RE HANGING ON TO A LOT OF A LOT OF RESERVE THERE. SO WANTED TO NOTE THAT IN OUR UTILITY FUNDS. AGAIN, I KEEP CALLING THIS A BRIDGE YEAR D WORKING TOWARD GETTING TO A TAX RATE ELECTION IN NOVEMBER 2026. SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE'VE DONE IN THE BUDGET IN ORDER TO HELP HELP ACCOMPLISH THAT ONE, IS THAT YOU'RE GOING TO SEE AND WE'LL DETAIL THEM HERE IN JUST A MINUTE, THAT WE'RE PROPOSING SOME OF THE REALLY WHAT OUR ONGOING EXPENSES IN THE GENERAL FUND FUNDING THOSE WITH ONE TIME RESOURCES THAT HAS TO DO WITH OUR PARKS, FACILITIES, SURF AND SWIM, SOME OF THE MAINTENANCE, THE PARKS, NEW MAINTENANCE THAT PARKS HAS TO DO. AND THEN SOME OF OUR LARGE INCREASES IN FLEET AND FUEL. THOSE ARE PROPOSED AS ONE TIME EXPENSES AS WELL. AND THEN WE ARE PROPOSING IN THE BUDGET A 2.5% ONE TIME LUMP SUM FOR EMPLOYEES. THE GENERAL FUND COST OF THAT IS ABOUT $3.5 MILLION. SO WE ARE GOING TO TALK MORE ABOUT THE TAX RATE ELECTION HERE IN JUST A FEW MINUTES. AND I'M GOING TO EXPLAIN THAT FUNNY LOOKING GRAPHIC THAT'S UP THERE WITH, WITH WATER SPILLING OUT OF A GREEN BUCKET. AND WITH THAT I'M GOING TO HAND IT OVER TO ALISON. THANK YOU JED. STARTING WITH OUR PROPERTY TAX BASE, WHICH WE AS YOU RECALL, WE REIVED CERTIFIED VALUES AT THE END OF JULY EACH YEAR. SO UP OVER THE SUMMER WHEN WE'RE MEETING WITH YOU FOR OUR COUNCIL WORKSHOP AND PROVIDING PRELIMINARY PROJECTIONS. ALL OF THOSE ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OVER THE COURSE OF THE SUMMER.

SO AT THE END OF JULY, WE RECEIVED OUR CERTIFIED PROPERTY TAX BASE. OUR CERTIFIED VALUATION IS 28.3 BILLION. THIS IS A INCREASE OF 5.6% FROM OUR 2024. JUST TO SUMMARIZE THOSE INCREASES BY AREA, WE HAD A VERY MODEST BUT HEALTHY INCREASE TO OUR PROPERTY TAX BASE AT 5.6%.

WHAT IS NOTABLE IS OUR RECORD NEW CONSTRUCTION. THIS IS THE HIGHEST NEW CONSTRUCTION. THE CITY OF PORTLAND'S HAD 2.1% INCREASE, 552 MILLION OF NEW CONSTRUCTION, OF WHICH 308 MILLION OF THAT IS DIRECTLY TO THE GENERAL FUND. WITH A LOT OF THAT PROPERTY TAX BASE GROWTH AND NEW CONSTRUCTION GROWTH COMING FROM OUR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TAX BASE. WE ARE PROPOSING TO HOLD THE PROPERTY TAX RATE FLAT TO THE 2024 2025 FISCAL YEAR. AS YOU RECALL, SB TWO AND THE TRUTH AND TAXATION PROCESS DOES DETERMINE THE CALCULATION OF OUR PROPERTY TAX RATE SO THAT WE CANNOT INCREASE GENERAL FUND REVENUES MORE THAN 3.5% FROM THE PRIOR YEAR. SO OUR PROPOSED RATE FOR 2526 IS 0.2886, WITH A PROPOSED DEBT SERVICE TAX RATE OF 0.4011, FOR A TOTAL COMBINED PROPOSED RATE OF 0.6897. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT SINCE SB TWO WENT INTO EFFECT BACK IN 2020, THE CITY HAS FOREGONE 29.3 MILLION IN ONGOING REVENUE TO THE GENERAL FUND AND AN OVERALL TAX RATE INCREASE. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THIS GRAPH OF 10.5 $0.04 PER $100 OF VALUATION, ALL TAKEN FROM THE O&M SIDE OF THE TAX RATE, WHICH GOES DIRECTLY TO GENERAL FUND REVENUE. EARLIER THIS YEAR, THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COMMITTEE DELIBERATED AND APPROVED SOME CHANGES TO THE CITY'S HOMESTEAD AND SENIOR EXEMPTIONS. THESE ARE REVIEWED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, AND ANY CHANGE MUST BE ADOPTED BEFORE JULY 1ST, SO THAT OUR ESSENTIAL APPRAISAL DISTRICTS CAN BE NOTIFIED. THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A 1% INCREASE IN THE HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION AND A $4,000 INCREASE TO OUR SENIOR EXEMPTION. THIS NOW MEANS THAT THE CITY OF GARLAND PROVIDES AN 11% HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION AND A $60,000 SENIOR EXEMPTION. SO MOVING INTO OUR IMPACT ON OUR RESIDENT OF THE 2025 PROPERTY TAX, YOU CAN SEE THAT OUR AVERAGE MARKET VALUE OF A GARLAND HOME ONLY INCREASED 1.1% ON, YOU KNOW, JUST FOR YOUR AVERAGE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENT WITHIN THE CITY OF GARLAND, DUE

[00:20:01]

TO THE 10% APPRAISAL CAP, THE AVERAGE APPRAISED VALUE IS GOING UP 6.7%. AS YOU RECALL, WE'VE HAD SOME REALLY RECORD INCREASES IN OUR RESIDENTIAL TAX BASE OVER THE PAST COUPLE YEARS, WELL ABOVE THAT 10% CAP. SO WE ARE SEEING A PORTION OF THOSE PRIOR INCREASES FILTER THROUGH, AS WELL AS JUST A SMALL AMOUNT OF GROWTH ON THE OVERALL MARKET VALUE. THE AVERAGE APPRAISED VALUE FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION IN 2025 IS 299,370.

AFTER APPLYING THAT HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION OF 11%, WE GET TO THEIR AVERAGE TAXABLE VALUE OF 266,439 AND THE AVERAGE ANNUAL CITY TAX OF $1,838, WHICH IS A 5.5% INCREASE, OR $96 INCREASE FROM 2024. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT OUR MARKET VALUE DID ONLY INCREASE 1.1%. HOWEVER, WHEN WE COMPARED TO DALLAS COUNTY CITY COUNTYWIDE, THE AVERAGE MARKET VALUE INCREASED 4.76%. SO THIS IS A CONCERNING FIGURE THAT OUR HOUSING STOCK AND PROPERTY TAX BASE IS NOT GROWING AT THE SAME RATE AS OTHER PEER CITIES WITHIN THE COUNTY. MOVING TO OUR ESTIMATED IMPACT ON A RESIDENT WITH A HOMESTEAD AND SENIOR EXEMPTION. LOOKING AT THAT SAME INCREASE ON THE MARKET VALUE OF 1.1%. INCREASE ON YOUR AVERAGE APPRAISED VALUE OF 6.7%. AFTER APPLYING OUR 11% HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION AND $60,000 SENIOR EXEMPTION, YOU'LL SEE THAT THEIR AVERAGE ANNUAL TAXABLE VALUE FOR 2025 IS 206,439, A 5% INCREASE FROM 2024. AND THAT AVERAGE ANNUAL CITY TAX IS $1,424, AN INCREASE OF $68, OR 5%, FROM 2024 TAXES. OUR GENERAL FUND FY 26 PROPOSED RESOURCES ARE SHOWN HERE. ON THIS GRAPHIC. YOU'LL SEE THAT OUR PROPERTY TAX BASE MAKES UP 78.2 MILLION OR 30%. SALES TAX IS 45.9 MILLION, 18% OUR LANDFILL AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT MAKE UP ANOTHER THIRD OF OVERALL GENERAL, ALMOST A THIRD OF OVERALL GENERAL FUND REVENUE, WITH OUR ALL OTHER REVENUE TOTALING 77.2 MILLION. ALL OTHER REVENUE FOR THE GENERAL FUND INCLUDES REVENUE FROM SOME OF THE DEPARTMENTS IN THE GENERAL FUND, SUCH AS EMS FEES, DEVELOPMENT PERMITS AND FEES, MUNICIPAL COURT FINES AND FEES, RECREATIONAL FEES, ALL THE ALL THE REVENUE FROM THE VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS IN THE GENERAL FUND. OUR FOUR LARGEST REVENUE SOURCES FOR THE GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT FOR 69% OF TOTAL GENERAL FUND RESOURCES. LOOKING AT THE EXPENDITURE SIDE FOR PROPOSED FOR FY 26, YOU'LL SEE THAT PUBLIC SAFETY TOTALS 171.4 MILLION, OR 67% OF TOTAL GENERAL FUND SPEND, WITH OUR CULTURE AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT BEING OUR SECOND LARGEST AT 31 MILLION OR 12%, FOLLOWED BY OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND DEVELOPMENT, GENERAL GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS. IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT PUBLIC SAFETY COMPRISES 67% OF TOTAL GENERAL FUND SPEND. OUR TWO LARGEST REVENUE SOURCES, PROPERTY TAX AND SALES TAX, ONLY MAKE UP ABOUT 48%. SO QUITE THE DICHOTOMY AND THE COST OF OUR CORE CITY SERVICES AND HOW MUCH OUR CORE REVENUES CAN BRING IN ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. LOOKING AT THE FUND SUMMARY FOR OUR CHANGE IN RESOURCES FROM FY 25 ADOPTED, WE'RE PROPOSING A $2.4 MILLION INCREASE IN OUR PROPERTY TAX BASE. THIS IS APPROXIMATELY 3.2%, SLIGHTLY LOWER THAN THE 3.5% IN SB TWO. AFTER YOU BACK OUT NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATED WITH OUR TIFS, ALL THE GROWTH IN OUR TIF VALUES, IT DOESN'T ALWAYS QUITE WORK OUT TO BE EXACTLY THAT. 3.5%. WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT THE CHANGE FROM OUR REVISED BUDGET, WHICH WE DID UPDATE OUR ESTIMATES BASED ON THE PROPERTY TAXES WE ARE SEEING COME IN, IT'S ABOUT A 4% INCREASE OVER OUR CURRENT YEAR REVISED BUDGET FOR OUR SALES TAX. AS YOU MAY RECALL, WE CAME TO THE COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP BACK IN JUNE TALKING ABOUT SOME

[00:25:02]

OF THE LARGE REVENUE TRENDS WE'RE SEEING THAT WILL TOUCH ON THIS LATER TODAY. JUST SOME OF THE STAGNATION WE'RE SEEING IN OUR SALES TAX GROWTH COMPARED TO PRIOR YEARS. WE'VE HAD SOME REALLY RECORD YEARS AND OVERALL SALES TAX AND WE'RE SEEING THAT LEVEL OUT. SO WE ARE PROPOSING A $1.9 MILLION DECREASE FROM OUR FY 25 ADOPTED BUDGET, JUST BASED ON THE TRENDS WE'RE SEEING. WE ARE PROPOSING WITH THIS BUDGET A CHANGE IN OUR ROI METHODOLOGY. SO WE ARE PROPOSING A $2.9 MILLION INCREASE TO THE TRANSFER FROM GPL TO THE GENERAL FUND FOR FY 26, AS WELL AS A $1.6 MILLION INCREASE IN OUR LANDFILL AND DISPOSAL SERVICES AS A RESULT OF SOME PROPOSED LANDFILL FEES, WHICH CHRIS HOOFNAGLE WILL TOUCH ON LATER TODAY, AS WELL AS A PROPOSED CHANGE IN THE DISPOSAL TRANSFER METHODOLOGY. WE ARE STILL IN THE PROCESS OF EXPANDING OUR ARPA FUNDS AWARDED FOLLOWING THE PANDEMIC. A PORTION OF THOSE ARPA FUNDS WILL GO TO REIMBURSE THE GENERAL FUND FOR PUBLIC SECTOR STAFFING, WHICH HAS THEN IN TURN FREED UP ONE TIME CASH TO HELP ASSIST WITH CIP PROJECTS THAT HAVE EXPERIENCED INFLATION SINCE THE PANDEMIC. SO WE ARE SEEING AN INCREASE OF ABOUT 1.7 IN THE IN THE TRANSFER FROM THE ARPA FUND TO THE GENERAL FUND ASSOCIATED WITH THAT, OUR INDIRECT COSTS AND TRANSFER ENDS PROPOSING TO INCREASE. WE ARE PROPOSING TWO NEW TRANSFERS TO THE GENERAL FUND AS PART OF THE FY 26 BUDGET. WE'RE PROPOSING A $300,000 TRANSFER FROM THE FIRE WILL FUND TO REIMBURSE THE GENERAL FUND FOR CONTRIBUTIONS MADE OVER THE LAST 20 YEARS, WHEN THAT FUND EXPERIENCED SOME VOLATILITY IN THE PAST. AND WE ALSO ARE PROPOSING A TRANSFER FROM TIF NUMBER TWO, WHICH MATT WATSON WILL TALK ABOUT HERE SHORTLY, ALONG WITH A PROPOSAL TO EXTEND THAT TIF LIFE. ALL OTHER REVENUE WE'RE PROJECTING TO INCREASE 4.8 MILLION. WE ARE DRAWING DOWN LESS FUND BALANCE THAN WE DID BEFORE. SO YOU DO SEE THAT WE'RE UTILIZING ABOUT $2.6 MILLION LESS OF FUND BALANCE. BUT WE ARE STILL DRAWING DOWN OUR FUND BALANCE FOR A TOTAL PROJECTED CHANGE IN RESOURCES OF 10.3 MILLION.

MOVING INTO THOSE PROPOSED REVENUE CHANGES, SEVERAL OF THESE WILL BE TOUCHED ON BY THE DEPARTMENTS YOU'LL HEAR FROM TODAY, BUT THE DISPOSAL FEE IS PAID BY THE SANITATION FUND. WE ARE WE WILL NOT NECESSARILY BE PRESENTING ON THIS TODAY, BUT WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. WE ARE PROPOSING TO ADJUST THE METHODOLOGY TO CHARGE THE COMMERCIAL TONNAGE COLLECTED BY SANITATION. THE COMMERCIAL RATE, INSTEAD OF JUST A COST OF SERVICE RATE. SO THIS IS JUST CHARGING OURSELVES THE RATE WE EXPECT OUR OTHER COMMERCIAL ENTITIES TO PAY. SO THIS IS PROPOSING AN INCREASE TO GENERAL FUND REVENUE OF ABOUT 1.1 MILLION. ALONG WITH THAT, CHRIS HOOFNAGLE WILL BE HERE LATER TODAY TO PRESENT ON SOME PROPOSED FEE CHANGES FOR THE LANDFILL, WHICH APPROXIMATELY BRING IN ABOUT ADDITIONAL 400,000, CHIEFLY WILL BE HERE TO PRESENT ON A PROPOSED CHANGE TO OUR EMS REVENUE, WITH THE PROPOSED INCREASE OF ABOUT 700,000 ASSOCIATED WITH THAT PROPOSED FEE CHANGE. OUR STAFF IS WORKING WITH THE CONSULTANT TO PRESENT OPTIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL ABOUT EXTENDING THE LIFE OF SHIFT TWO THAT WILL GO INTO THIS LATER TODAY. BUT AS PART OF THAT CONSIDERATION, WE WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE A TRANSFER FROM TIF TWO TO THE GENERAL FUND FOR SOME COST RECOVERY OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY ASSIGNMENT TO THAT TIF ZONE. PROJECTED REIMBURSEMENT FOR FY 26 OF ABOUT 1.1 MILLION. AND THEN FINALLY, OUR PARKS AND RECREATION STAFF WILL BE HERE TODAY TO PRESENT ON A PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE ASSOCIATED WITH OUR ENHANCED SURF AND SWIM AQUATIC FACILITY. WITH THE PROJECTED REVENUE INCREASE OF ABOUT 150,000. LOOKING AT THE EXPENDITURE SIDE OF OUR FY 26 PROPOSED GENERAL FUND, WE HAVE ABOUT 3.5 MILLION BUDGETED FOR A 2.5% ONE TIME LUMP SUM PAYMENT. WE HAVE 1,000,001.1 MILLION BUDGETED FOR A 6% INCREASE IN THE GENERAL FUND TRANSFER TO THE GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE FUND FOR OUR EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS, AND $92,000 INCREASE TO OUR CONTRIBUTION TO THE GROUP HEALTH FUND FOR OUR RETIREE PLAN, AN INCREASE FOR OUR CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT STABILITY BENEFIT GOING FROM THE CITY CONTRIBUTION AT 2.5% TO 2.75%. ABOUT 354,000 FOR THE FY 26 BUDGET. WE HAVE

[00:30:14]

WHAT OUR NEW BUDGET REQUEST, WHICH WE CALL STRATEGIC PRIORITY PROPOSALS INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE GENERAL FUND OF JUST SHY OF 2.3 MILLION, SOME ADDITIONAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES OF ABOUT 800,000. AND OF COURSE, CHANGES TO OUR SUPPORT SERVICES AND TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS OF ABOUT 5.3 MILLION. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT A LARGE PORTION OF THIS INCREASE ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS IS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT CASH BEING TRANSFERRED TO THE CIP FOR THOSE PROJECTS. AS PART OF OUR OVERALL ARPA PLAN, TOTAL CHANGE IN PROPOSED EXPENDITURES IS 10.3 MILLION. LOOKING AT THE GENERAL FUND BOTTOM LINE, WE HAVE TOTAL FUNDING RESOURCES OF 257.2 MILLION. TOTAL PROPOSED FUNDING USES OF 257.2 MILLION. WE ARE PROPOSING A BUDGET THAT MEETS OUR 30 DAY FUND BALANCE REQUIREMENT, WHICH FOR FY 26 IS 19.2 MILLION. AND THEN WE'RE ALSO PROPOSING THAT WE HOLD IN RESERVE AN ADDITIONAL 14.7 MILLION, SO THAT THE COMBINED 30 DAY FUND BALANCE REQUIREMENT OF 19.2 PLUS THIS ADDITIONAL 14.7 MILLION, WILL PROVIDE US 53 DAYS OF TOTAL RESERVES IN THE GENERAL FUND. IN FRONT OF YOU WITH YOUR PRESENTATIONS. TODAY IS A LIST OF ALL THE STRATEGIC PRIORITY PROPOSALS BY FUND AND BY DEPARTMENT, DETAILED OUT THAT'S INCLUDED IN THE FY 26 BUDGET. SO HOPE YOU'RE ABLE TO FIND THAT IT WAS AT THE TOP OF YOUR PACKET. TODAY. I WILL GO OVER A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE PSPS, AS WE CALL THEM, THAT ARE IN THE GENERAL FUND FOR FY 26. WE HAVE PSPS, MOST SIGNIFICANTLY FOR OUR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT IN FY 26 ASSOCIATED WITH OUR SURF AND SWIM AQUATIC FACILITY OPENING UP THIS YEAR, AS WELL AS SOME OTHER REQUESTS THAT WE HAVE BEEN FUNDING IN A ONE TIME BASIS IN PRIOR YEARS THAT WE'RE NEEDING TO CONTINUE INTO FY 26 FOR OUR ANIMAL SERVICES,UMAN RESOURCES, MUNICIPAL COURT AND SPECIAL EVENTS. YOU'RE LOOKING AT A TOTAL OF ABOUT 2.3 MILLION OF NEW BUDGET REQUESTS FOR FY 26 AND THE GENERAL FUND. LOOKING CITYWIDE, WE'RE PROPOSING ABOUT 9.4 MILLION IN NEW BUDGET REQUESTS, OR PSPS, FOR THE VARIOUS FUNDS AND DEPARTMENTS OF THE CITY. MOST SIGNIFICANTLY FOR OUR ELECTRIC UTILITY, TOTALING ABOUT 3.8 MILLION, FOLLOWED BY OUR WATER AND WASTEWATER DEPARTMENTS, EACH AT 1.6 AND 1.1 MILLION, RESPECTIVELY. WITH THE FY 26 PROPOSED BUDGET, WE ARE PROPOSING SOME UTILIZATION OF SOME SHORT TERM DEBT TO FUND ITEMS THAT WE HISTORICALLY WOULD HAVE FUNDED WITH ONE TIME CASH, DUE TO HAVING RESTRICTED RESOURCES. THIS YEAR, WE'RE HOPING TO LEVERAGE THE DEBT SERVICE PORTION OF THE TAX RATE TO MEET THESE DEPARTMENTAL NEEDS. WE ARE PROPOSING THE AN ADDITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK PARTY TRAILER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD VITALITY, SOME PARKS AND RECREATION REPLACEMENT TRACTORS, AND CONTINUATION OF TRANSPORTATION SIGNS AND MARKINGS PROGRAM. AND IT'S JUST IMPORTANT TO NOTE, BECAUSE THAT WILL BE ON THE CIP SIDE OF THE EQUATION, WE ARE BRINGING FORWARD A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO CITY COUNCIL ON MONDAY NIGHT.

THESE ITEMS ARE INCLUDED ON THERE IN PARALLEL TO THIS FY 26 OPERATING BUDGET PROCESS. I'LL TURN IT BACK OVER TO JED TO TALK ABOUT OUR GROUP HEALTH FUND COUNCIL. THE GROUP HEALTH FUND IS SOMETHING THAT WE'VE BEEN PAYING ATTENTION TO CLOSER. AND WHAT WHAT THE FUND IS, IS ESSENTIALLY ALL THE MONEY THAT COMES IN AND GOES OUT FOR THE PACKAGE OF BENEFITS THAT WE PROVIDE EMPLOYEES. SO MEDICAL INSURANCE, DENTAL VISION, BOTH FOR ACTIVE EMPLOYEES AND FOR RETIREES. AND SO, AS I'VE MENTIONED BEFORE, WHAT WE'RE REALLY TRYING TO DO WITHIN THIS, WITHIN THIS FUND IS TO PROVIDE A SUSTAINABLE PATH WHERE THE GROWTH OF THE FUND REALLY CORRESPONDS TO THE RESOURCES THAT WE HAVE AVAILABLE. AND YOU'LL SEE, HISTORICALLY, THE

[00:35:04]

FUND HAS GROWN MUCH MORE THAN REALLY WHAT OUR 3.5% CAP IS IN THE GENERAL FUND. AND SO IT'S DOUBLED. THE SIZE OF THE FUND HAS DOUBLED OVER THE LAST TEN YEARS AND IS CAUSING SOME, SOME PRESSURES REALLY ACROSS THE, ACROSS THE CITY. SO NOT JUST WITH THE GENERAL FUND BUT WITH ALL OF OUR, OUR FUNDS AS WELL. SO THOSE ARE THOSE ARE KIND OF MY COMMITMENTS, KIND OF MY GOALS WITH THE GROUP HEALTH FUND. IF YOU GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE DIVING INTO THE DETAILS ON THE ON THE HEALTH OR THE MEDICAL SIDE, THIS MAKES UP THE GREATEST PART OF OUR GROUP HEALTH FUND. WE ARE SELF SELF-FUNDED, MEANING THAT CLAIMS ARE PAID OUT DIRECTLY FROM THE GROUP HEALTH FUND. AND SO WHAT? WHAT PROBABLY USED TO BE VERY A LOT MORE PREDICTABLE IN THE IN THE CURRENT HEALTH CARE ENVIRONMENT. IT'S IT CAN BE VOLATILE AT TIMES. AND SO WE'RE ALWAYS TRYING TO, YOU KNOW, MOVE DIALS AND LEVERS TO GET THE BENEFITS TO, TO THE POINT WHERE THEY'RE ATTRACTIVE BUT ALSO SUSTAINABLE AND ALSO JUST PROVIDE THE RIGHT MIX WCH WHICH IS WHAT YOU SEE HERE IN TERMS OF WHAT THE CITY CONTRIBUTES TO THE PREMIUMS AND WHAT THE WHAT THE EMPLOYEES CONTRIBUTE TO, TO PREMIUMS. SO ON THE ACTIVE SIDE, WE HAVE ABOUT 2000 EMPLOYEES ON OUR ON OUR PLAN, IT'S ABOUT 8317 MIX WHEN IT COMES TO CITY, COVERING 83%. ON THE MEDICAL SIDE, 17% FOR EMPLOYEES. WE DID BUILD IN A 6% INCREASE TO EMPLOYEES AND A 6% INCREASE TO THE CITY THIS YEAR. ON THE RETIREE SIDE, WE HAVE ABOUT 833 RETIREES OF 265 THAT ARE BEFORE OUR PRE 65 AND THEN 568 THAT ARE POST 65 FOR A MEDICARE SUPPLEMENT THAT WE THAT WE OFFER THROUGH THE CITY. AND IT'S ABOUT A 5347 MIX. WE DID DO A 10% INCREASE TO RETIREES AND A 3% INCREASE TO CITY CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE RETIREES. LOOKING AT THE AT THIS, YOU KNOW, I MENTIONED ABOUT THE GROWTH OF THE FUND AND OUR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS. YOU KIND OF SEE THE TREND OF WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE. DEFINITELY NOT A SUSTAINABLE PATH. AND WHILE WE NEED TO CONTINUE TO COMPETE IN THE MARKET FOR RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF GREAT EMPLOYEES AND MEMBERS OF TEAM GARLAND, WE ALSO NEED TO BALANCE THAT OUT WITH WITH BEING ABLE TO PROVIDE A SUSTAINABLE FINANCIAL SITUATION FOR THE GROUP HEALTH FUND. SO AGAIN, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT YOU'RE YOU'RE GOING TO KEEP HEARING ABOUT IN FUTURE, FUTURE BUDGET YEARS. WE DID WHAT WE COULD THIS YEAR TO BALANCE OUT AND NOT SORT OF SPREAD THE COST COMPLETELY TO EMPLOYEES. BUTLONE SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE TO HAVE TO ADDRESS AND LOOK AT CLOSELY. SO JUST WANTED TO KEEP IT ON YOUR RADAR. AND LIKE I SAID, YOU'RE GOING TO KEEP HEARING ABOUT THIS IN IN FUTURE YEARS. THANK YOU JED. SO MOVING INTO SOME OF OUR OTHER CITY FUNDS. MAYOR PRO TEM MARK, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. GOING BACK TO SLIDE 25, THE 6% INCREASE, WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE ON A PAYCHECK? HOW MANY DOLLARS IS THAT. SO? FOR OUR BASE PLAN, WHICH IS JUST AN EMPLOYEE BEING COVERED NO DEPENDENTS. IT'S JUST SHY OF $4 PER MONTH INCREASE. AND I THINK WE AS FAR AS THERE'S SOME OTHER PLANS THAT ARE OFFERED, BUT THAT'S THE THAT'S THE POPULAR ONE. OKAY. FOR EMPLOYEE PLUS FAMILY PLAN WHICH IS OUR SECOND LARGEST PLAN. YOU'RE LOOKING AT A $27 INCREASE OKAY. WHEN IT COMES TO FULL COVERAGE HEALTH CARE THOSE NUMBERS ARE QUITE LOW. I MEAN, I, I HAVE HEALTH CARE THROUGH MY HUSBAND AND IT'S INCREASED WAY MORE THAN THAT. SO I'M I'M GLAD THAT THOSE NUMBERS AREN'T. WHEN YOU SEE A PERCENTAGE LIKE THAT, IT MAKES IT A LITTLE SCARIER. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND IF I MAY ADD, THERE IS A GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE FUND NARRATIVE AND THE PROPOSED BUDGET DOCUMENT. AS PART OF THAT NARRATIVE, WE DO OUTLINE THE CHANGES IN RATES FOR EACH OF THE PLANS. OKAY. THANK YOU. VERY GOOD. COUNCILMAN. MOR. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. AND ALISON AND MATT, YOU GUYS, AS ALWAYS, WONDERFUL JOB. LOTS OF NUMBERS AND LOTS TO CONSIDER. COULD YOU GO BACK AND EXPLAIN A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE MEDICARE SUPPLEMENT ASPECT OF THE BENEFIT PACKAGE AND HOW THAT FINANCIALLY IMPACTS

[00:40:09]

THAT PARTICULAR BUDGET? SURE. SO FOR OUR RETIREES, WE OFFER PRE 65 AND POST 65. SO ON PRE 65 YOU ARE NOT ON MEDICARE YET. SO YOU WOULD BE LOOKING TO THE CITY TO HELP YOU PAY FOR ALL OF YOUR MEDICAL INSURANCE. WHEN YOU HIT POST 65. WE PROVIDE A MEDICARE SUPPLEMENT. SO TYPICALLY MEDICARE PROVIDES HISTORICALLY ABOUT 80% OF YOUR HEALTH CARE NEEDS. THE SUPPLEMENT LOOKS TO PROVIDE THE REMAINING PIECE OF THAT OF YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE NEEDS. SO FOR THE CITOF GARLAND, WHAT WE DO IS WE PROVIDE BOTH PRE 65, WHICH COVERS ALL THE COSTS OF YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE UNTIL YOU CAN GET TO MEDICARE. AND THEN WHEN YOU GET TO MEDICARE, WE PROVIDE A SUPPLEMENT THAT COVERS THE COST OF THAT GAP THAT MEDICARE DOESN'T PAY FOR. AND THE SUPPLEMENT DOES EACH YEAR OR PERIODICALLY INCREASES AS AGE INCREASES. IS THAT CORRECT? YEAH. ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT AS FAR AS THE PREMIUMS FOR THE SUPPLEMENT, THE MONEY THAT WE ACTUALLY PAY OUT? IN OTHER WORDS, WE'RE TALKING NOW ABOUT, AS JUDD IS SAYING, WE'RE GOING TO BE TALKING ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR THIS GROUP HEALTH PLAN FOR QUITE SOME TIME BECAUSE OF THE EXPENSES OF IT. AND I WOULD THINK THAT THE MEDICARE SUPPLEMENT AFTER 65 IS PROBABLY ONE OF THE REASONS FOR THAT, BECAUSE IT GOES UP AS AGE INCREASES. CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. SO WE DO HAVE AN ACTUARIAL STUDY THAT LOOKS AT WHAT WE CALL OPEB. IT'S OTHER POST EMPLOYEE BENEFITS. AND WHAT THEY LOOK AT IS WHAT IS THE LONG TERM IMPACT OF YOUR RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE. AND FACTORS THAT GO INTO THAT IS PEOPLE ARE LIVING LONGER. ONE AND YOU JUST SAW HOW MUCH MEDICAL COST IS GOING UP AS WELL. SO THESE FACTORS OVER THE TIME HAVE INCREASED THE COST. RIGHT NOW OUR OUR POLICY ON RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE IS YOU NOTICE THAT THE CITY IS AT 3%. WE HAVE CAPPED OUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO ALL RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE AT 3% PER YEAR, MEANING THE RETIREES WILL HAVE TO PICK UP THE REST. SO IF YOU'RE HAVING EIGHT 9% INCREASES, OUR CAP IS THREE, OKAY. AND WE PUT THAT INTO PLACE ROUGHLY IN 2018 TO TRY TO MITIGATE AND REDUCE THE GROWING NUMBER OF OUR LONG TERM LIABILITY. HOWEVER, WE STILL, YOU KNOW, AS JUDD SAID, WE STILL NEED TO LOOK AT A SUSTAINABLE PATH FOR RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE AND FOR THE EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE BECAUSE OF THE VOLATILITY IN IN WHAT WE'RE SEEING. AND THEN JUST THE ONGOING COST IS TRENDING ROUGHLY 7%. SO WHEN YOU'RE HAVING A 7% IN YOUR LARGEST REVENUE SOURCE, IT'S CAPPED AT THREE AND A HALF. IT MAKES IT DIFFICULT. SO THERE ARE A MULTITUDE OF THINGS THAT WE NEED TO LOOK INTO WITH HEALTH INSURANCE. BUT YES, THAT IS ONE WITH THE WITH THE POST 65 MEDICARE SUPPLEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT. THIS BENEFIT IS VERY GREAT, VERY GOOD FOR OUR EMPLOYEES BECAUSE WHAT IT DOES IS IT ALLOWS THEM THE SUPPLEMENT PICKS UP THE CO-PAYS, THE COINSURANCE, THE DEDUCTIBLES, WHICH BASICALLY JUST BY GIVING THEM 100% PROTECTION. CORRECT. THAT IS CORRECT. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. THANK YOU. SIR. IF I CAN ADD REAL QUICK TOO, IF YOU GO BACK TO THE PREVIOUS SLIDE, THE ON THE RETIREE SIDE. SO A COUPLE NOTES. ONE IS THAT THE MARKET MIX OF WHAT WHAT AN EMPLOYEE OR SORRY WHEN EMPLOYERS WHEN OTHER CITIES DO OFFER A RETIREE MIX, IT'S CLOSER TO ABOUT A 25% CONTRIBUTION BY THE CITY, 75% FOR RETIREES. THAT WAS THE LAST DATA WE HAD. AND SO YOU SEE THAT WE'RE WE'RE A LITTLE HEAVIER ON THAT SIDE, ON THE CITY SIDE. AND THEN WE DO HAVE I MEAN, YOU SEE THE NUMBERS 568 THAT ARE ON THE POST 65 PLAN. AND I THINK THAT MAKES UP IT'S NORTH OF 3 MILLION WHEN IT COMES TO THE ACTUAL CITY'S COST. SO WE ARE HEAVY ON THE ON THE POST 65 SIDE OF THINGS. THAT'S WHAT WOULD MAKE SENSE. YEAH, YEAH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. I'M NOT I. AGENT BUT THAT 10% INCREASE. IN IN DOLLAR VALUE. CAN YOU CAN SOMEBODY SAY WHAT WHAT THAT IS. AND THE SECOND QUESTION IS JUDGE YOU MENTIONED THAT IT WOULD BE THAT THAT'S GOING TO BE AN ONGOING TOPIC. HOW ARE YOU GOING TO ARE YOU GOING TO IN ADVANCE SURVEY THOSE PEOPLE OR HOW ARE YOU HOW

[00:45:05]

DO YOU HOW DO YOU ANTICIPATE GOING FORWARD WITH WITH THOSE CHANGES AND MEASURING ACCEPTANCE AND NON ACCEPTANCE AMONG RETIREES AND EMPLOYEES FIRST. YEAH I CAN GO FIRST. SO FOR OUR PRE 65 OUR MOST POPULATED PLAN WHICH IS THE RETIREE ONLY YOU'RE LOOKING AT ABOUT A $29 INCREASE PER MONTH PER MONTH OKAY. ALL RIGHT. AND THEN OR OUR MEDICARE ELIGIBLE OUR MOST POPULATED PLAN AGAIN RETIREE ONLY. ALSO LOOKING AT A $29 INCREASE PER MONTH. THAT'S MORE THAN REASONABLE. AND HOW ARE YOU PLANNING ON MARKETING THIS GOING FORWARD. YOU KNOW IT'S A TOUGH ONE TO MARKET. COMMUNICATION REALLY IS KEY. AND WE'VE BEEN WE'VE BEEN CLEAR WITH EMPLOYEES THAT WHEN WE DID OUR TOWN HALL A FEW WEEKS AGO, FIRST OFF, COMMUNICATING WHAT THE CHANGES ARE GOING TO BE AND THEN ALSO COMMUNICATING THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT THIS CONTINUALLY MOVING FORWARD.

SO I YOU KNOW, YOU MENTIONED A SURVEY. THOSE GET TRICKY BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, IF YOU SURVEY SOMEBODY, DO YOU WANT US TO CUT YOUR YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE ARE GOING TO SAY, NO I'M NOT. SO IT'S MORE MORE COMMUNICATION. I JUST THREW THAT OUT. I WAS NOT SUGGESTING THAT. YEAH I JUST THREW IT OUT AS ONE POSSIBILITY. BUT WE DO I I'M COMMITTED TO COMMUNICATING WHATEVER CHANGES WE MAKE EARLY AND OFTEN BECAUSE I. AND PART OF WHAT WE'VE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT INTERNALLY IS THAT ANY CHANGES WE MAKE LONG TERM, WE'VE GOT TO BE ABLE TO PHASE IN AS MUCH AS WE CAN SO THAT IF I'M IF I'M POST 65 AND I KIND OF HAVE MY BUDGET SET AND I KNOW WHAT TO EXPECT IF WE TELL THEM, YOU KNOW, THREE, FOUR YEARS, WE'RE GOING TO PHASE THIS IN, IT GIVES THEM TIME TO CONSIDER THEIR OPTIONS AND REALLY LOOK AT THINGS. SO I THINK THE I THINK THE KEY IS COMMUNICATION AND PHASING IN ANY CHANGES OVER TIME OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. COUNCILMEMBER BASS THANK YOU. ON THE RETIREE SIDE. IT'S OF COURSE, I THINK IT'S A GREAT BENEFIT THAT WE OFFER RETIREES AND CURIOUS A COUPLE THINGS IS ARE THERE ANY STATISTICS ABOUT, YOU KNOW, BUSINESSES OR, OR GOVERNMENT THAT HOW RETIREE BENEFITS LIKE OFFERING A RETIREE BENEFIT, HOW DOES THAT AFFECT EMPLOYEE RETENTION? AND ALSO HOW COMMON IS IT TO PROVIDE MEDICAL INSURANCE TO RETIREES? WE HAVE THAT INFORMATION NOT IN FRONT OF US, BUT WE CAN PROVIDE THAT IN A WRITTEN RESPONSE OR AT A FUTURE WORK SESSION. OKAY, I'M JUST CURIOUS ABOUT THAT BECAUSE I'M ASSUMING THAT, YOU KNOW, THAT THAT OUR RETIREE BENEFIT IS PRETTY, PRETTY STRONG COMPARED TO OTHERS. BUT I'M JUST MAKING THAT ASSUMPTION. SO IT IS IF WE WHEN WE WERE GOING THROUGH THE COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT FOR THE TWO-YEAR PROCESS LAST, LAST FISCAL YEAR, YOU MAY HAVE RECALLED, WE PROVIDED A PRESENTATION SHOWING METROPLEX CITIES LOOKING AT THE TRYING TO LOOK AT THE COMPLETE RETIREE BENEFITS OR LOOKING AT YOUR PENSION, PLUS YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE. AND WHAT THAT SHOWED WAS, YES, WE DID NOT HAVE A COLA AND WE WERE THE ONLY CITY THAT DID NOT HAVE IT. BUT WHAT WE'VE TRIED TO DO OVER TIME IS PROVIDE A RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE BENEFIT THAT WAS STRONGER, SO THAT IT COULD HELP SUPPLEMENT THE FACT THAT WE DON'T HAVE A COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT. SO WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING ACROSS MOST METROPLEX CITIES, THERE ARE THERE ARE METROPLEX CITIES THAT JUST FLAT OUT DO NOT PROVIDE RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE. THERE'S AND THERE'S ALSO SOME THAT, AS JUDD MENTIONED, THE NORM IS ROUGHLY ABOUT A 25% CITY CONTRIBUTION. WE'RE AT 53. SO THAT'S OUR THAT'S ON THE ONES THAT ARE ACTUALLY PROVIDING A HEALTH INSURANCE BENEFIT. AND SO OUR FIRST STRATEGY WAS TO CAP OUR OUR CONTRIBUTION AT 3% PER YEAR. AND YOU SEE THAT THE THIS YEAR RETIREES ARE AT TEN. SO AND WE'RE AT 5347 OVER TIME, IF THAT TREND CONTINUES, WHICH WE ALL ANTICIPATE IT WILL, THAT 53% WILL DWINDLE DOWN LOWER. AND THEN THE RETIREES WILL GROW HIGHER. HOWEVER, THAT WILL TAKE MULTIPLE YEARS TO DO. OKAY. THANK YOU. MAYOR. I DID WANT TO MENTION TO BECAUSE I'M SURE THE QUESTION WILL BE ASKED AT SOME POINT. DO WE HAVE TO PROVIDE RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE? AND STATUTORILY, THERE IS A REQUIREMENT THAT CITIES ABOVE 30,000, 50,000, I FORGET WHAT THE THRESHOLD IS, HAVE TO AT LEAST PROVIDE AN OPTION FOR RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE,

[00:50:05]

DOESN'T DOESN'T SPEAK TO HOW MUCH IT HAS TO BE OR WHAT THE CITY'S CONTRIBUTION IS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. BUT THERE IS A REQUIREMENT THAT WE AT LEAST PROVIDE AN OPTION OUT THERE.

THANK YOU, MAYOR PRO TEM LUCK. I HAD KIND OF TOUCHED ON THIS EARLIER. THE LAST TIME WE WERE JUST GIVEN LIKE A BROAD VIEW OF OUR BUDGET. I REALLY THINK THAT THOSE PERCENTAGES NEED TO BE ADJUSTED, AND I'M I'M SURE THAT RIGHT NOW ISN'T A GOOD TIME TO DO IT, SINCE WE'RE JUMPING INTO THINGS AND CODIFYING EVERYTHING SOON. BUT NEXT YEAR, I WOULD REALLY LIKE TO SEE THOSE PERCENTAGES ADJUSTED AND. I JUST LIKE AN 8020 AND THEN 6040 TYPE SITUATION, IF NOT EVEN MORE SO.

I WOULD REALLY LIKE THOSE NUMBERS PRESENTED TO US AS FAR AS LIKE WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE ON AN EMPLOYEE'S PAYCHECK, JUST LIKE EARLIER, $4, YOU SEE 6%. IT'S REALLY $4. THAT'S, YOU KNOW, THE BIG TO SEE THE NUMBER VALUE REALLY MAKES A BIG DIFFERENCE. AND I MEAN HEALTH CARE IS EXPENSIVE. IT JUST IS. ONE OF THE PERKS OF WORKING FOR A MUNICIPALITY IS THAT YOU GET GREAT BENEFITS. BUT YOU ALSO, YOU KNOW, ARE STILL GETTING GREAT BENEFITS. EVEN IF THOSE PERCENTAGES CHANGE SLIGHTLY. SO THANK YOU. WE CAN PROVIDE THAT INFORMATION FOR YOU. THANK YOU, THANK YOU COUNCILMEMBER MORE. SORRY FOR JUMPING BACK IN ONE MORE TIME, BUT I, I BROUGHT THAT SUBJECT UP BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT VERY IMPORTANT FOR COUNCIL AND ESPECIALLY OUR EMPLOYEES AND FOR THE COMMUNITY TO RECOGNIZE THAT THIS THIS PLAN IS ONE OF THE BEST THAT YOU CAN HAVE, ESPECIALLY BY WAY OF THE SUPPLEMENT BEING PART OF IT. WHEN IT COMES TO RETAINING EMPLOYEES. THIS IS A PLAN THAT WILL DO THAT WHEN IT COMES TO NOT HAVING, AS YOU STATED, THE COLA. THIS IS A PLAN THAT WILL DO IT. WHY? BECAUSE TO HAVE A SUPPLEMENT MEANS THE 8020 THAT YOU'RE SPEAKING OF. FORGET IT. THERE IS NO 8020. IT'S 100% PRETTY MUCH BECAUSE THE SUPPLEMENT TAKES CARE OF THE CO-PAYS, THE INSURANCES, AS WELL AS ANY DEDUCTIBLES. SO THIS IS A VERY GOOD BENEFIT FOR OUR EMPLOYEES. THAT WAS THE REASON THAT I WANTED TO BRING THAT UP.

THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. COUNCILMEMBER DUNCAN. I THINK WE CAN ARGUE ABOUT BENEFITS ALL DAY LONG, BUT WHAT'S GOING TO COST US OUR EMPLOYEES IS A LUMP SUM PAYMENT, BECAUSE THAT DOESN'T GET THEM INTO THE MARKET RATE WITH OTHER CITIES. THAT'S WHAT'S GOING TO LOSE OUR, OUR, OUR EMPLOYEES. SO I THINK THAT THE HEALTH CARE ASPECT OF IT IS SO TRIVIAL.

THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY WHAT OUR EMPLOYEES ARE CONCERNED ABOUT RIGHT NOW, BUT THEY'RE CONCERNED ABOUT IS THAT THEY'RE NOT GOING TO GET THAT INCREASE ON THEIR REGULAR WAGE. SO WHAT HAPPENS NEXT YEAR WHEN WE GO TO GIVE PAY RAISES? THEY'RE GOING TO GET THE PAY RAISE THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN THIS YEAR. SO IF SOMEONE IS MAKING $15 AN HOUR, THEY'RE GETTING A 2.5% LUMP SUM. BUT THEN NEXT YEAR WE GIVE THEM A 3% RAISE. IT'S NOT GOING TO IT'S NOT GOING TO EQUATE WE ALREADY LOSE PEOPLE BECAUSE OF THEIR CITIES, PAY HIGHER HOURLY WAGES. SO I THINK THAT ARGUING OVER THE HEALTH CARE ASPECT OF IT, $4, $10, WHATEVER IS THE LEAST OF OUR WORRIES IF WE'RE WORRIED ABOUT EMPLOYEE RETENTION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MA'AM. COUNCIL. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU SO MUCH. ALONGSIDE THE FY 26 PROPOSED BUDGET, WE PRESENT OUR UTILITY RATES TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION. OVER THE PAST THREE YEARS, WE'VE PRESENTED A STORMWATER UTILITY RATE STRATEGY. IF YOU RECALL, BACK IN FY 24 BUDGET PREPARATION, WE COMMITTED TO INCREASING OUR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL STORMWATER RATES TO PROVIDE SEED FUNDING OVER TIME FOR ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AND OR EROSION CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS. F 26 PROPOSED IS THE FINAL YEAR OF THAT THREE YEAR PHASE IN TO THE METROPLEX AVERAGE, WHICH HAD A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL RATE OF $6.44. WHILE WE ARE NOT SEEKING DIRECTION OR, YOU KNOW FROM COUNCIL AT THIS TIME, THERE WILL NEED TO BE DISCUSSION AS PART OF NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET IF WE WANT TO CONTINUE THAT PHASE IN STRATEGY TO GET TO THE. WHAT IS THE CURRENT METROPLEX AVERAGE OF $7.53 FOR AN AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY? THIS SLIDE OUTLINES OUR OVERALL PROPOSED RATE CHANGES INCLUDED IN THE FY 26

[00:55:08]

PROPOSED BUDGET. WE ARE PROPOSING INCREASES TO OUR WATER AND SEWER, TRASH, RECYCLING. AND OF COURSE, AS DISCUSSED ON THE LAST SLIDE, OUR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FEE, OUR GARLAND GARLAND WATER UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WILL BE PRESENTING LATER TODAY TO DISCUSS THE FACTORS DRIVING SOME OF THEIR RATE INCREASES, AS WELL AS URIEL WITH THE SANITATION FUND PRESENTING ON HIS FEE CHANGES AS WELL. SO WE'RE LOOKING AT A TOTAL RATE INCREASE OF $7.17 WITH THIS FY 26 PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE AVERAGE RESIDENT. OUR OVERALL MONTHLY CITIZEN IMPACT OF A PERCENT OF INCOME IS INCREASING. WITH THIS FY 26 PROPOSED BUDGET. IT'S ABOUT OUR AVERAGE CITIZENS PAYING ABOUT 6.3% OF THEIR AVERAGE INCOME IN PROPERTY TAXES AND UTILITY RATES. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE CITY OF GARLAND'S AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD INCOME HAS BEEN RELATIVELY LEVELED FOR THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS. THE CURRENT AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD INCOME IS $89,165. SO, AS YOU KNOW, INFLATION HAS HIT THE CITY AND THE COST TO OPERATE SOME OF THESE CORE SERVICES ON A DAILY BASIS HAS CONTINUED TO RISE. WE HAVE NOT SEEN OUR AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD INCOME RISE AT THAT SAME RATE. AS PART OF THE ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS, WE ARE REQUIRED TO DISCLOSE AND PRESENT ON THE ANY PROPOSED LINE ITEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF NARCOTIC SEIZURE FUNDS. OUTLINED HERE IS THE STATE AND FEDERAL RESTRICTIONS THAT APPLY TO THE USAGE OF THOSE NARCOTIC SEIZURE FUNDS. AND ON THIS SLIDE, HERE IS THE FY 26 PROPOSED USE OF THOSE FUNDS. WE'RE PROPOSING TO USE ABOUT 185,000 OF OUR FEDERAL SEIZURE FUNDS, MOST NOTABLY ARE OUR KIND OF OUR TWO ONE TIME EXPENDITURES THAT WE DON'T TRADITIONALLY FUND ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. WITH THESE IS THE REPLACEMENT AND OUTFITTING OF OUR OFFICERS WITH BALLISTIC SHIELDS AND A NEW K-9 UNDER OUR STATE SEIZURE FUND, WE'RE PROPOSING THE USE OF ABOUT $64,000 FOR ITEMS THAT WE TYPICALLY REQUEST APPROVAL FOR ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, FOR A TOTAL PROPOSED USE OF ABOUT 249,000 OF SEIZURE FUNDS AS PART OF THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT. WE'VE COMMITTED TO PRESENTING THE USE OF THESE FEDERAL GRANT DOLLARS ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. AS THE COUNCIL RECALLED, WE RECEIVED 53.5 MILLION OF ARPA FUNDS FOR THE CITY'S USE. COUNCIL HAS GONE THROUGH A PROCESS ON AN ANNUAL BASIS TO REVIEW THAT PROJECT LIST, AS WELL AS THE ALLOCATION OF THOSE. WE ARE NOT PROPOSING ANY CHANGES TO THE BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR THOSE FUNDS THIS YEAR. JUST WANTED TO REPORT ON OUR PROGRESS WITH SPENDING THOSE GRANT FUNDS, AS THEY ALL HAVE TO BE EXPENDED BY THE END OF DECEMBER 2026. AND WE HAVE ABOUT 50, ALMOST 54% EXPENDED. ONE SECOND. YES, SIR. COUNCIL MEMBER MOORE, AM I LOOKING AT THE WRONG INFORMATION HERE, I SEE. LET ME SEE WHEN JOE WAS ON THERE, IF YOU. YES. ANYTHING REGARDING THE WIND, JOYCE PARK? YES, SIR. IF YOU RECALL, DUE TO THE SCHEDULE OF WHEN JOYCE BEING GOING THROUGH THE DESIGN, THE CITIZEN COMMITTEE PROCESS AND THEN ULTIMATELY CONSTRUCTION, THERE WAS CONCERNS THAT WE WOULD NOT MEET THE DECEMBER 2026 DEADLINE. SO WE FOUND WE FOUND OTHER RESOURCES IN THE CIP TO FUND THAT. WE TRANSFERRED FUNDS. YEAH. YES, SIR. MR. MAYOR, THANK YOU, SIR. AND WE ARE EXPECTED TO EXPEND ALL THESE FUNDS BY OUR DEADLINE. CORRECT. I DON'T WANT TO LEAVE ANY MONEY ON THE TABLE.

VERY GOOD. WITH THE FY 26 PROPOSED BUDGET, WE ARE ALSO PROPOSING THE UTILIZATION OF SOME OF OUR RESTRICTED USE TREE MITIGATION FUND. WE ARE PROPOSING SOME PLANT AND LANDSCAPE REPLACEMENT MAINTENANCE OUT OF OUR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT, AND SOME TREE CANOPY AND BRUSH MAINTENANCE THROUGH OUR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT FOR A TOTAL PROPOSED USE. PROPOSED USE OF $175,000 IN FY 26. WITH THAT, I WILL MOVE OVER TO OUR LONG TERM OUTLOOK. IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS ON THE FY 26 OVERVIEW ONE SECOND.

COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS YEAH, I JUST THOUGHT OF QUESTIONS. SORRY. JUDD. OR YOU DOES THE

[01:00:07]

WHAT'S GOING ON NOW WITH WITH THE TREE AND TREE PRESERVE AND THIS BACK THAT DOES IT HAVE ANY RELEVANCE, ANY CONNECTION AT ALL TO. NO. SO THE TREE MITIGATION FUNDS COME FROM FEES THAT DEVELOPERS PAY WHEN THEY REMOVE TREES ON ON PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT. AND IT GOES INTO A POT OF MONEY.

AND COUNCIL CAN ALLOCATE THAT FOR RELEVANT USES. I, I THOUGHT THAT WAS THE CASE WITH THE PRESERVE IS A SEPARATE ENTITY RIGHT. YES. OKAY. AND WE'RE DEALING WITH THAT SEPARATELY RIGHT. YES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. JUST I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE. OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU SIR. MAYOR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COUNCIL, BEFORE WE MOVE ON, PLEASE CONTINUE. SO I'M GOING TO KICK OFF AND JUST TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE LONG TERM OUTLOOK AND WHAT WE'RE ANTICIPATING SEEING OVER THE NEXT FIVE PLUS YEARS. AND THEN WE'LL AND THE REASON WHY THIS TAX RATE SHIFT THAT WE'RE PREPARING FOR NEXT YEAR IS SO IMPORTANT AS WE KEEP MOVING FORWARD. BUT OF COURSE, BEFORE YOU DO THAT, I WANTED TO TAKE A STEP BACK AND TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT HOW WE GOT TO WHERE WE ARE NOW AND SOME OF THE HISTORICALLY WHAT SOME OF THE CHALLENGES HAVE BEEN FROM A FINANCIAL STANDPOINT. SO I'M SHOWING YOU IN THIS CHART REALLY THREE DIFFERENT THINGS AND THE THREE DIFFERENT WAYS. SO THE FIRST THING IS IF YOU LOOK AT THIS CHART, IT'S THE PROPERTY TAX VALUES AND ITS GROWTH SINCE 2009 AND WHY SINCE 2009. THAT WAS THE START OF THE GREAT RECESSION. AND IN THE BLUE IS THE INCREASE OR DECREASE TO THE PROPERTY TAX VALUES OVER THAT TIME. AND WHY IT TURNS GREEN IS TH'S WHEN SB TWO WENT INTO EFFECT. YOU'LL SEE A RED DOTTED LINE THAT IS GOING FROM 2009 TO 2026. THAT REPRESENTS JUST A 3.5% INCREASE EACH YEAR. SO YOU CAN SEE FROM THE TAX BASE GROWTH, WE HAD AN $11.2 BILLION TAX BASE IN 2009.

IT DWINDLED DOWN AND WE DID NOT RECOVER BACK TO $11.22 BILLION TAX BASE UNTIL 2016. HOWEVER, WE TYPICALLY NEED ABOUT 3.5% INCREASE IN OUR REVENUES TO SUPPORT ONGOING EXPENDITURES AND KEEP SERVICE LEVELS WHERE THEY NEED TO BE. YOU CAN SEE IT TOOK ALL THE WAY TO 2021 BEFORE THE TAX BASE GOT TO THAT INFLATIONARY NUMBER. SO THAT'S A 12 YEAR PERIOD WHERE WE WERE HAVING TO REALLY MAKE DO WITH MUCH LOWER REVENUE THAN WE NEEDED TO KEEP CURRENT SERVICE LEVELS. HOWEVER, THERE WAS A HUGE SPIKE AFTER THAT. EVERYONE KNOWS POST-COVID THAT THE TAX BASE GREW BECAUSE THE HOUSING BOOM. BUT YOU'LL NOTICE THAT THE GREEN REPRESENTS SB TWO. SO THAT'S WHEN WE STARTED BEING CAPPED ANYWAY AT 3.5%. SO HOW DID THAT IMPACT TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES. SO THIS IS A LOOK SAME KIND OF LOOK. BUT LOOKING AT TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE.

AND 2008 WE HAD $130 MILLION OF GENERAL FUND REVENUE. THE IMPACTS OF THE RECESSION AND THE LONG TERM IMPACTS OF THAT. WE DID NOT BREAK EVEN WITH THE 3.5% UNTIL 2024. AND HERE'S THE SAME LOOK LOOKING AT EXPENDITURES. SO OBVIOUSLY WE WERE NOT ABLE TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURES THAT WE NEEDED TO OVER THIS LONG PERIOD OF TIME. SO REALLY ON ALL THREE OF THESE SLIDES, WHAT WHAT THE POINT OF THEM IS, IS TO SAY THAT OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS, WE'VE HAD SOME REALLY LARGE GROWTH IN OUR REVENUES, AND WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO INCREASE OUR BUDGET, ADD NEW STAFF. BUT A LOT OF IT WAS TO TAKE CARE OF PAST PROBLEMS BECAUSE OF THIS. 12. EXCUSE ME, SIR, CAN YOU PLEASE KEEP THE DISTRACTIONS DOWN? YES, SIR. THANK YOU. PLEASE CONTINUE. SO BACK TO WHAT? WHAT THESE CHARTS ARE TRYING TO SHOW IS THAT THE GREAT RECESSION, WHILE IT TOOK PLACE IN 2008, IT TOOK 12 YEARS FOR US TO FULLY RECOVER FROM THAT EXPERIENCE. AND THEN AFTER THAT, THE POST-COVID BOOM, WE WERE ABLE TO HAVE ADDITIONAL REVENUES. BUT A LOT OF THAT WAS GEARED TOWARDS MAKING UP FOR LOST GROUND DURING THAT GREAT RECESSION. AND HERE'S ONE MORE LOOK AT THAT. ON THE AMOUNT OF EMPLOYEES THAT WE HAD IN THE GENERAL FUND. SO AGAIN, THE RED BAR REPRESENTS THE GREAT RECESSION. YOU CAN SEE THAT WE HAD 2116 EMPLOYEES IN 2008, AND WE DID NOT REACH THAT SAME LEVEL UNTIL 2018. SO ROUGHLY TEN YEARS OF REDUCED STAFF LEVELS TO PERFORM THE SAME TYPE OF WORK.

[01:05:06]

SO A LOT OF CATCH UP HAS HAD TO HAPPEN. AND THIS IS PROBABLY THE SLIDE THAT I'M MOST NOTABLE FOR TALKING ABOUT THE GARLAND'S CHALLENGE. THIS IS A LOOK AT ALL OF OUR METROPLEX CITY'S PROPERTY TAX BASE, SALES TAX BASE, AND THE PER CAPITA REVENUE WE RECEIVE, THEY RECEIVE FROM THOSE TWO TYPES OF TAXES. AND WHAT THE CITY OF GARLAND'S TAX BASE IS. AND YOU CAN SEE THAT WE ARE 42% BELOW THE METROPLEX AVERAGE. AND IF WE WERE JUST AT THE AVERAGE, THAT'S ROUGHLY $89 MILLION OF ADDITIONAL TAX REVENUE THAT THE GENERAL FUND WOULD BE RECEIVING. SO MOVING FORWARD, WE TALKED ABOUT THIS A LITTLE BIT AT THE JULY RETREAT, AS SE OF THE THINGS WE'RE SEEING IN TRENDS.

AND EARLIER, ALLISON, WHEN SHE WAS TALKING ABOUT OUR TAX BASE GROWTH, WE REALLY WHAT WE WERE REALLY WHAT YOU SAW WHEN THE TAX BASE GROWTH IS NEW CONSTRUCTION AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES WERE REALLY THE ONLY THING THAT WAS GROWING. YOU SAW THAT ON THE RESIDENTIAL BASE THAT IT WAS ONLY A 1.9% INCREASE. AND THIS CHART SHOWS FROM THE BOOM OF POST COVID, THE INCREASES WE WERE SEEING FROM MLS DATA ON THE PRICE PER SQUARE FOOT AS COMPARED TO WHERE WE ARE NOW, THE PEAK PRICE OF GARLAND HOME WAS AT $184.92, AND THAT WAS IN APRIL OF 2024. YOU CAN SEE BY APRIL OF 2025, IT IS STARTING TO RETREAT BACK AT 183.35. SO SEVERAL THINGS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS HERE IS, IS THIS JUST STAGNATION OR IS THIS GOING TO CONTINUE TO DROP? ANOTHER CONCERNING NUMBER ALLISON POINTED OUT, IS THAT THE METROPLEX COMPARED TO US, AGAIN, WE WERE AT ABOUT A 1% THE METROPLEX. THEIR MARKET VALUES WENT UP STILL AROUND 5%. SO THERE'S SOME THINGS THAT WE NEED TO DIG INTO AND REALLY WATCH THESE NUMBERS CLOSELY. BUT YOU CAN DEFINITELY SEE THAT THE TREND RIGHT NOW FROM THESE 12 MONTH MOVING AVERAGE IS THAT HOME VALUES SHOULD ARE APPEARING TO BE STAGNATING OUT AND DIPPING JUST SLIGHTLY. SAME STORY IS REALLY TRUE FOR OUR SALES TAX. SALES TAX AFTER THE GREAT RECESSION REALLY REALLY WAS THE ONE KEY THING THAT SAVED US AND ALLOWED US TO START BEING ABLE TO TAKE CARE OF A LOT OF THE ISSUES THAT WERE THAT THAT WERE CAUSED FROM THE GREAT RECESSION.

MANY THINGS HAPPENED IN THE FIRST YEAR THERE IN 2021. ONE WAS THAT THE SOMETHING CALLED THE WAYFAIR ACT WAS SIGNED INTO LAW, WHICH ALLOWED US TO COLLECT SALES TAX ON ONLINE PURCHASES FROM THINGS LIKE AMAZON TO ANYTHING THAT YOU'RE BUYING ONLINE FROM A DESTINATION BASE.

ALSO, INFLATION WAS AT EIGHT 9% AT THAT TIME. SO OBVIOUSLY THAT WOULD FLOW THROUGH TO THE COST OF GOODS, INCREASING SALES TAX. AND THEN THE THIRD THING WAS IS JUST THE POST-COVID BOOM. PEOPLE WERE OUT WANTING TO SPEND THEIR MONEY AGAIN. SO YOU CAN SEE IN THAT FIRST YEAR OF THE POST COVID, WE HAD ABOUT A 24% INCREASE IN OUR SALES TAX. THE NEXT YEAR, WE HAD ABOUT A 14% INCREASE IN OUR SALES TAX, AND THEN DOWN TO 10% IN 2024. I WILL SAY THAT WHAT WAS GOING ON IN 2024 WAS THERE WAS A LOT OF ONE TIME SALES TAX THAT WE COLLECTED FROM THE DATA CENTERS THAT ARE OFF OF GEORGE BUSH FOR THE SERVERS AND EVERYTHING THAT THEY HAD TO PURCHASE TO RUN THOSE FACILITIES. SO THIS PROBLEM UNDER THE UNDERLYING THERE WAS ALREADY A STAGNATION OUT IN 2024 THAT WE WERE EXPERIENCING, BUT WE HAD THOSE ONE TIME REVENUES TO HELP INCREASE THE SALES TAX.

HOWEVER, FOR 2025, YOU CAN SEE THAT IT'S ALREADY A 3% DROP FROM 2024. IT DOES APPEAR THAT THE SALES TAX NUMBERS ARE STARTING TO STAGNATE OUT, NOT NECESSARILY CONTINUING TO DIP DOWN OR DROP, WHICH IS A GOOD SIGN. BUT THE BAD NEWS IS, IS EVEN STAGNATION IS GOING TO MAKE IT HARD FOR US TO CONTINUE YEAR TO YEAR TO ADD SERVICES OR CONTINUE TO PROVIDE THIS SERVICES WE ALREADY HAVE.

SO LONG TERM IN OUR GARLAND PLUS FIVE, WE'VE THIS MODEL LOOKS TO TAKE NOT JUST THE INFORMATION I SHOWED YOU, BUT EVERY REVENUE SOURCE THAT WE HAVE AND WE TREND IT OUT BASED OFF OF HISTORICAL NORMS AND HISTORICAL PERCENTAGES. AND YOU CAN SEE THAT WE ARE PROJECTING TO HAVE ABOUT $6 MILLION MORE EACH YEAR IN REVENUE IN THE GENERAL FUND. BUT WE'RE ANTICIPATING JUST TO COVER THE SERVICES. WE ALREADY HAVE ABOUT $10.7 MILLION OF ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURES, WHICH IS ABOUT A $4.8 MILLION DEFICIT EACH YEAR. NOW, WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THERE ARE YEARS WHERE WE

[01:10:04]

HAVE BETTER THAN ANTICIPATED FUND BALANCES, AND THAT USUALLY HISTORICALLY RUNS AT ABOUT 1.5 MILLION. SO THAT 4.8 CAN BE ANYWHERE FROM A 4.8 MILLION DEFICIT DOWN TO SOMEWHERE IN A $3.3 MILLION DEFICIT. HOWEVER, THERE IS STILL GOING TO BE SOME GROUND THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE UP OVER TIME. ANOTHER BIG IMPACT IS IN THE 2019 BOND PROGRAM. THE NEW FACILITIES THAT ARE COMING ONLINE HAVE A COST TO OPERATE, AND RIGHT NOW WE'RE ESTIMATING BETWEEN PARKS, LIBRARY AND FIRE THAT BETWEEN FY 26 AND FY 30, WE WILL NEED AN ADDITIONAL $3.7 MILLION TO FULLY OPERATE THOSE FACILITIES. SO THAT IS ON TOP OF THE $4.8 MILLION DEFICIT NUMBER THAT I SHOWED YOU IN THE PREVIOUS SLIDE. AND THIS SLIDE IS JUST A LOOK AT THE BOND PACKAGE THAT WAS APPROVED, WHICH IS VERY EXCITING FOR STAFF AND FOR THE RESIDENTS AS WE MOVE FORWARD WITH PROGRAMING THESE DOLLARS. ONE THING I WILL POINT OUT IS THAT THESE THE PROGRAMING OF THESE DOLLARS WILL SHOW UP IN YOUR CIP, WHICH WILL BE TALKING ABOUT IN THE JANUARY TIME FRAME.

AND THIS, THESE THESE DOLLARS WILL NOT IMPACT WHAT I'M ABOUT TO GET INTO. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE TAX RATE SHIFT. AND JUST TO ADD, AS WE GO THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PROGRAM, WE ARE GOING TO BE TRACKING AND PRESENTING TO COUNCIL ANY OPERATIONAL IMPACTS THAT RESULT OUT OF PROP C AND D SPECIFICALLY. BUT AT THIS TIME, A STAFF IS STILL IN THE KIND OF THE RESEARCH AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PHASE. WE DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION YET AVAILABLE.

SO WE'LL MOVE INTO THE TAX RATE SHIFT THAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT FOR NOVEMBER 2026. THIS CHART JUST SHOWS SINCE 2008 WHAT OUR TAX RATE HAS BEEN. YOU CAN SEE IN 2008 WE'RE AT 68.86. AND THEN FOR A LONG PERIOD OF TIME ALL THE WAY TO 2019, WE HELD OUR TAX RATE FLAT AT 70.46. AND AT THAT TIME, THE COUNCIL I TALKED EARLIER ABOUT THE GREAT RECESSION AND HOW IT TOOK 12 YEARS TO GET OUT OF THAT, OUT OF THAT GREAT RECESSION. AND AT THAT TIME RESIDENTS WERE STRUGGLING AS WELL. AND SO THE COUNCIL AT THAT TIME DID NOT WANT TO INCREASE THE TAX RATE AND WANTED TO HAVE A LEVEL TAX RATE IN ORDER TO PROTECT RESIDENTS AS WELL. SO WE DID NOT HAVE A TAX RATE INCREASE UNTIL 20 1920. AT THAT TIME. THAT WAS THE 2019 BOND PROGRAM. WHEN WE WENT TO THE VOTERS FOR THE 2019 BOND PROGRAM, WE ALSO ASKED FOR A SIX AND A HALF CENT TAX RATE INCREASE TO FUND THE DEBT SERVICE PORTION OF THE TAX RATE AND TO CONSTRUCT THESE FACILITIES. AND THEN YOU SEE THE RED LINE IS SB TWO. THAT IS WHEN THE LEGISLATURE CAPPED OUR SIZE.

SO OUR OPERATIONS SIDE, WHICH FUNDS THE GENERAL FUND AT 3.5%. AND HOW THEY DID THAT WAS AS TAX BASE THE BASE GROWS, THEY CAP YOUR THEY LOWER YOUR TAX RATE TO GET THE DELTA TO COME OUT TO 3.5%, WHICH IS THE REVENUE. SO IF YOUR TAX BASE GOES UP 20%, YOUR RATE'S GOING TO HAVE TO COME DOWN TO FORCE A 3.5% REVENUE. AND WITH THE HOUSING BOOM, WE OBVIOUSLY SAW SOME MASSIVE TAX BASE GROWTH. AND YOU CAN SEE THAT OUR TAX RATE ON ALL ON THE NO SIDE HAS DWINDLED ALL THE WAY BACK DOWN TO 68.97, WHICH IS THE LOWEST LEVEL WE'VE SEEN SINCE 2007 EIGHT AND REPRESENTS ALMOST OVER $30 MILLION OF ONGOING REVENUE THAT'S BEEN FOREGONE TO THE GENERAL FUND, AND IS ABOUT 11.1 CENTS PER $100 OF VALUE THAT'S BEEN LOST DUE TO SB TWO. SO NOW LET'S GET INTO THE TAX RATE SHIFT THAT WE ARE PROPOSING TO DO IN FY 26 AND FY 27. SO OUR CURRENT TAX RATE IS MADE UP OF THE TAX RATE, WHICH IS 0.290 FOR THIS YEAR. AND THIS FUNDS THE GENERAL FUND. THIS IS WHAT FUNDS OPERATIONS AND PUBLIC SAFETY PARKS, THINGS OF THAT NATURE.

THE DEBT SERVICE TAX RATE IS 0.3993. AND THAT FUNDS THE BOND PROGRAMS AND OUR CIP FOR A TOTAL TAX RATE OF 0.689 $0.07 PER $100 OF VALUATION. SO FIRST, I WANT TO GO THROUGH STATUS QUO. WHAT WE MEAN BY STATUS QUO IS WE DO NOT LOOK TO MAKE ANY TAX RATE SHIFTS, AND WE ALLOW SB TWO TO CONTINUE TO ERODE AWAY THE TAX RATE ON THE NO SIDE. SO IN FY 26, THAT 0.2904 CURRENT TAX RATE WITH CERTIFIED VALUES WILL BE 0.2886. WHAT WE ARE. AND THEN ON THE DEBT SERVICE TAX RATE ON A

[01:15:08]

STATUS QUO SCENARIO, WE WOULD HOLD THE DEBT SERVICE TAX RATE LEVEL AT 0.3993 FOR A TAX RATE OF 0.6880. MOVING INTO FY 27, ASSUMING MORE GROWTH IN OUR TAX BASE, THE RATE IS SCHEDULED TO BE 0.2851. BASED OFF OF OUR PROJECTIONS, AND THE DEBT SERVICE TAX RATE WOULD NEED TO GO BACK DOWN TO THE .3756, WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLYY APPROVED BEFORE WE STARTED HAVING THIS THIS CYCLE OF KEEPING THE TAX RATE FLAT. SO AT THAT POINT, OUR TAX RATE WOULD BE 0.6607 PER $100 OF VALUE. THE PROPOSAL IS TO CONTINUE TO HOLD THE TAX RATE FLAT AT 0.6897. HOWEVER, AGAIN, THE TAX RATE WILL HAVE TO GO DOWN BECAUSE OF THE LEGISLATIONN FROM SB TWO. HOWEVER, WE WOULD INCREASE THE DEBT SERVICE TAX RATE TO 0.4011 THIS YEAR AND UTILIZE THOSE FUNDS AS A SHORT TERM DEBT INSTRUMENT, WHICH ALLISON TALKED ABOUT A LITTLE BIT EARLIER, TO FUND NOT JUST SOME OF THE ITEMS THAT YOU SAW IN THE IN THE, IN THE BUDGET EARLIER, SOME OF THE EQUIPMENT, BUT ALSO FUND OUR STREETS PROGRAM. THOSE WOULD ALL BE PAID OFF WITHIN ONE YEAR. AND THEN NEXT YEAR WE WOULD LOOK TO REDUCE THE DEBT SERVICE TAX RATE AND SHIFT THAT OVER TO THE TAX RATE TO HELP FUND ALL THE NEEDS WE HAVE JUST TALKED ABOUT IN THE GENERAL FUND. THIS IS ANOTHER WAY TO LOOK AT IT, JUST FROM A TABLE PERSPECTIVE ON WHAT OUR WHAT OUR PROPOSAL IS. AND YOU CAN SEE IN THE GREEN COLUMN, THAT IS OUR PROPOSAL TO KEEP THE TAX RATE AT 0.6897 FOR BOTH 20, 25 AND 26. AND WITH THIS, IF THE TAX RATE IS APPROVED IN FY NEXT NOVEMBER, NOVEMBER 2026, THIS IS EXPECTED TO GENERATE ABOUT $8 MILLION OF ADDITIONAL REVENUE TO THE GENERAL FUND. SO AGAIN, WE'VE ALREADY MENTIONED THAT WE'RE EXPECTING SOMEWHERE ROUGHLY IN THE $4 MILLION DEFICIT NEXT YEAR TO PUT ALL OF THE NEW 2019 BOND PROGRAM PACKAGES AND OPERATIONAL OPERATIONALIZE THOSE. THAT'S ANOTHER 3 MILLION. SO REALLY, THIS $8 MILLION IS OF SIGNIFICANT IMPORTANCE TO GET MOVED OVER TO THE SIDE JUST TO COVER OUR CURRENT SERVICE LEVELS AND OUR CURRENT COMMITMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY ON THE BOND PROGRAM. LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE THE TAX RATES SLIDE. AGAIN, JUST JUST TO SHOW WITH THE STATUS QUO VERSUS THE SHIFT. SO YOU CAN SEE IN 2026, IF WE STAYED WITH THE STATUS QUO SCENARIO, THE TAX RATE WOULD BE ABOUT 0.6607.

HOWEVER WE ARE PROPOSING TO KEEP IT LEVEL AT 0.6897. SO COUNCIL, AS WE LOOK TO NOVEMBER OF NEXT YEAR TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I'M TRYING TO BUILD A STORYBOOK FOR AND FIND A WAY TO TALK WITH RESIDENTS ABOUT GARLAND'S CHALLENGE, AND I WANTED TO SHARE A FEW SLIDES. WE SHARED THIS AT COUNCILMAN MOORE'S TOWN HALL THE OTHER NIGHT. THAT WAS KIND OF OUR OUR TRIAL RUN, OUR TEST ON ON THIS BECAUSE I, I REALLY WANT TO FIND WHAT RESONATES WITH RESIDENTS FROM A FROM AN EXPLANATION STANDPOINT ON ON GARLAND'S CHALLENGE. AND SO WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS, IF YOU LOOK AT A TYPICAL SINGLE FAMILY HOME, NOT WHAT IT ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE, BECAUSE THIS IS JUST A CARTOON. BUT WHAT IF YOU, AS WE MENTIONED EARLIER, OUR AVERAGE HOME TAXABLE VALUE IS ABOUT $266,000. THAT'S AFTER OUR EXEMPTIONS. THE HOMESTEAD AND SENIOR EXEMPTIONS.

AND SO IF YOU LOOK AT OKAY, OVER A 20 YEAR PERIOD BASED ON OUR OUR CURRENT TAX RATE OF 0.6897, HOW MUCH REVENUE DOES THAT GENERATE OVER A 20 YEAR PERIOD? YOU GET TO ALMOST $52,000. AND SO EVERYBODY LOVES STREETS, RIGHT. AND PEOPLE ARE VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE STREET IN FRONT OF THEIR HOUSE. IF YOU IF YOU LOOK AT THE AVERAGE COST TO MAINTAIN JUST THAT SEGMENT OF ROADWAY IN FRONT OF YOUR HOUSE, AND I SAY MAINTAIN IT, ESSENTIALLY BUILD A BRAND NEW CONCRETE STREET IN FRONT OF YOUR HOUSE AND THEN MAINTAIN IT FOR A 20 YEAR PERIOD, THAT SAME 20 YEARS THAT WE'RE COLLECTING TAX REVENUE, THE TAXES WE RECEIVE FROM THAT AVERAGE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE DO NOT DOES NOT COVER THE COST TO MAINTAIN THAT STREET. AND SO THAT GIVES PEOPLE A SENSE

[01:20:02]

OF JUST HOW UPSIDE DOWN WE ARE FROM A FROM A GARLAND'S CHALLENGE STANDPOINT. OBVIOUSLY, IF YOU CHANGE ANY OF THE ANY OF THE NUMBERS IN THE EQUATION HERE, PARTICULARLY THE AVERAGE HOME TAXABLE VALUE, THAT NUMBER GOES UP AND OUR TAX RATE STAYS THE SAME, THE EQUATION CHANGES AND THIS PLAYS OUT DIFFERENTLY. AND THAT'S WHY YOU SEE THAT SOME CITIES DON'T HAVE THE SAME TYPE OF CHALLENGE THAT WE HAVE WHERE THAT THAT AVERAGE TAXABLE VALUE IS HIGHER. SO IT GENERATES MORE TAX REVENUE AND COVERS THAT, THAT STREET COST. BECAUSE WHETHER YOU'RE BUILDING A REPLACING A STREET IN FRONT OF A HOUSE IN PLANO, FRISCO, MCKINNEY OR GARLAND, IT'S GENERALLY GOING TO BE ABOUT THE SAME. AND SO THIS IS ONE WAY TO LOOK AT LOOK AT GARLAND'S CHALLENGE AND THE, THE, THE WIDER SPREAD ISSUE IS THAT IT'S ABOUT THREE QUARTERS OF OUR LANDMASS IS MADE UP OF THESE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WITH THAT AVERAGE VALUE. AND SO FOR THAT EXTRA 25% OF LANDMASS, THAT'S MULTIFAMILY AND COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL. IT DOES SPIN OFF. THE NUMBERS LOOK DIFFERENT THERE, OBVIOUSLY. AND SO YOU TRY TO GAIN SOME GROUND THERE. BUT THAT'S WHY WE ALWAYS TALK ABOUT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TRYING TO SQUEEZE MORE JUICE OUT OF THE OUT OF EVERY PIECE OF LAND THAT WE CAN, BECAUSE IT HELPS THIS UPSIDE DOWN SITUATION THAT WE'VE GOT. ANOTHER WAY TO LOOK AT IT IS, AS MATT'S TALKED ABOUT BEFORE, THAT WE'RE ABOUT 90 MILLION SHORT OF ON AVERAGE, PER CAPITA, PER CAPITA, PROPERTY TAX AND SALES TAX. AND IN FACT, IF YOU IF YOU ADD UP OUR PROPERTY TAX AND SALES TAX, IT STILL DOESN'T COVER THAT TWO THIRDS OF OUR GENERAL FUND BUDGET THAT MAKES UP PUBLIC SAFETY. AND SO THAT'S ANOTHER WAY TO LOOK AT IT. WE KNOW THAT WE'RE ALMOST BUILT OUT. AND REALLY THE WAY TO OVERCOME GARLAND'S CHALLENGES IS TO TAKE FOCUSED ACTIONS AND MAKE DECISIONS THAT ARE REALLY GOING TO CHANGE THAT TRAJECTORY, ONE OF WHICH IS, EXCUSE ME, THE TAX RATE ELECTION IN IN NOVEMBER 2026. AND SO I TALKED ABOUT THE BUCKETS EARLIER. AND THAT'S WHAT YOU SEE HERE. NEXT IS AGAIN TRYING TO EXPLAIN TO RESIDENTS A WAY THAT THAT THAT THAT RESONATES WITH THEM ABOUT THESE TWO BUCKETS THAT WE HAVE AND WE HAVE THE RED BUCKET THAT'S DEBT SERVICE THAT'S NOT CAPPED. AND AS PROPERTY VALUES GO UP, WE CAN CAPTURE ALL OF THAT. AND ON THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SIDE, IT'S LEAKY. IT'S THE 3.5% CAP THAT WE'RE DEALING WITH. AND SO HOW DO WE HOW DO WE INTERACT WITH THESE TWO BUCKETS AND MAKE IT HAPPEN. AND OF COURSE, THAT LEADS US TO THE NOVEMBER ELECTION NEXT YEAR WHERE WE WANT TO TAKE THIS UNCAPPED DEBT SERVICE TAX RATE THAT WE'VE KEPT LEVEL FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS AND MOVE IT OVER TO THE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SIDE OF THINGS, AND ULTIMATELY NOT LOOKING TO INCREASE THE TAX RATE, JUST MOVE IT BETWEEN BUCKETS AND TRY TO REMEDY THE SITUATION WE'RE IN.

SO AS YOU GUYS HAVE TOWN HALLS THIS FALL AND INTO NEXT YEAR, I'M HAPPY TO COME AND PRESENT THIS AND CONTINUE TO MAKE TWEAKS TO IT. BECAUSE ULTIMATELY WHEN WE GET INTO, YOU KNOW, REALLY SPRING SUMMER OF NEXT YEAR LEADING INTO NOVEMBER, WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO HAVE A REALLY GOO, A REALLY GOOD OUTREACH OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN WHAT WHAT'S HAPPENING NOW, MUCH LIKE GISD IS DOING WITH THEIR WITH THEIR UPCOMING ELECTION IN NOVEMBER. SO I THINK THAT I THINK THERE'S ONE MORE GRAPHIC ON THERE SHOWING THE TAX RATE ELECTION THERE. AS MATT MENTIONED, AT LEAST OUR ESTIMATES RIGHT NOW, RIGHT NOW ARE THAT THIS IS GOING TO MOVE ABOUT $8 MILLION OF REVENUE FROM DEBT SERVICE TO OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AND, AND ALLOW THAT TO SPIN OFF AND, AND DO THE THINGS THAT WE NEED TO DO TO KEEP PROVIDING SERVICES. SO THAT NUMBER IS GOING TO CHANGE. WE DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH NEXT YEAR WHEN WE GET OUR CERTIFIED VALUES, BUT ULTIMATELY IT'S GOING TO CHANGE TO SOME EXTENT AND WE'LL KNOW THAT NEXT YEAR.

COUNCIL MEMBER MOORE, DID I HEAR YOU SAY WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A TAX INCREASE? NO. THIS FEELS LIKE IT FEELS LIKE A TRICK QUESTION. NO. NOAX RATE INCREASE. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR.

I WAS A LITTLE BIT OF AN INSIDE JOKE. YES. I WANTED TO MAKE SURE. NO TAX INCREASE. JUST TO BE CLEAR. NO TAX INCREASE. IT'S REAL QUICK. I WANTED TO GIVE THE COUNCIL A QUICK OVERVIEW OF THE BUDGET DOCUMENT THAT WE PRESENTED TO YOU AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS MONTH, AND WE'VE CONTINUED TO DISCUSS LEADING UP TO THE OVERVIEW. YOU WILL FIND SECTIONS DEDICATED TO THE CITY'S MISSION, VISION AND STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS. OUR CITY ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, AND THE CITY MANAGER'S PROPOSED BUDGET MESSAGE. THEN YOU'LL GET INTO OUR FIRST MAJOR SECTION, WHICH

[01:25:01]

IS THE OVERVIEW WHICH THE GOAL HERE IS TO SUMMARIZE ALL OF THE SECTIONS IN OUR PROPOSED BUDGET DOCUMENT. AND JUST TO GIVE YOU A HIGH LEVEL SUMMARY OF ANYTHING CONSIDERED IN THE BUDGET, THAT'S A CHANGE. YOU'LL THEN MOVE INTO OUR FINANCIAL SUMMARY SECTIONS, WHERE YOU'LL SEE A THREE YEAR FINANCIAL REPORT FOR EACH OF THE CITY'S DEPARTMENT AND FUNDS, A STAFFING LEVEL, AND A NARRATIVE ABOUT ANY BUDGET CHANGES THAT ARE CONSIDERED WITH THIS YEAR'S BUDGET. FOLLOWING THAT IS, WE HAVE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF OUR CIP, SINCE THAT IS ON A DIFFERENT CYCLE. BUT THE TWO RELATE AS MANY FACILITIES CONSTRUCTED IN THE CIP IMPACT THE OPERATING BUDGET. WE HAVE A SECTION DEDICATED TO SUMMARIZING THOSE AND FORMALIZING THAT CONNECTION. WE HAVE A SECTION DEDICATED TO PERSONNEL WHERE WE OUTLINE ANY MAJOR PERSONNEL CHANGES. HISTORIC DATA SECTION WHERE WE SUMMARIZE A TEN YEAR HISTORY OF SOME OF THE MAJOR BUDGET VALUES, INCLUDING PROPERTY TAX BASE GROWTH, PROPERTY TAX REVENUE, STAFFING LEVELS, COST OF GOVERNMENT OVER THE PAST TEN YEARS. AND THEN FINALLY YOU GET INTO OUR APPENDICES, WHICH IS JUST A BUNCH OF SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, INCLUDING HOW THE BUDGET PROCESS WORKS, WHAT ARE HOW WE GO ABOUT THAT PRIOR TO THE COUNCIL PROCESS, WHAT THE COUNCIL PROCESS IS OUTLINED TO BE A CALENDAR ASSOCIATED, ANY CHANGES IN OUR REVISED BUDGET, WHICH THIS COUNCIL CONSIDERS AT THE SAME TIME AS NEXT YEAR'S PROPOSED, AS WELL AS A SUMMARY OF ANY REVENUE ENHANCEMENTS PROPOSED WITH THIS YEAR'S BUDGET. AND IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE CITY'S PROPOSED BUDGET DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE. WE WILL ALSO BE POSTING THE PRESENTATIONS FROM TODAY TO THAT CITY WEBSITE UNDER A PAGE DEDICATED TO THE PROPOSED BUDGET AND CITIZENS OR MEMBERS OF THE CITY STAFF CAN ALSO ACCESS THOSE DOCUMENTS AT THE GARLAND PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND IN THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE.

AND THEN WE WILL HAVE MULTIPLE OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENGAGEMENT ON THE PROPOSED BUDGET AND THE PROPOSED TAX RATE. OVER THE REMAINDER OF THIS MONTH, WE'LL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR DISCUSSION ON AUGUST 18TH, THIS UPCOMING MONDAY, AS WELL AS A PUBLIC HEARING ON BOTH THE PROPED BUDGET AND TAX RATE. ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 19TH. THE CITY COUNCIL HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST AN ADDITIONAL SPECIAL SESSION ON AUGUST 6TH 26TH IF REQUIRED. OTHERWISE, WE WILL PLAN TO COME BACK ON SEPTEMBER 2ND FOR ANY HIGH LEVEL OVERVIEW OF ANY CHANGES DISCUSSED TO DATE, AND THEN ALSO SEEK ADOPTION THAT SAME NIGHT. SO WITH THAT, I'LL OPEN UP TO ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE WE BEGIN OUR PRESENTATION. MAYOR PRO TEM LUCHT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE PRESENTATION. I WE'VE GOT A SHORT SUMMARY PACKET AND I HAVE SEVERAL QUESTIONS WITHIN THIS PACKET. DO YOU WANT TO YOU WANT ME TO WAIT UNTIL THE PRESENTATIONS ARE DONE OR DO YOU WANT TO DO THOSE BEFORE WE START PRESENTATIONS? UNLESS YOU DISAGREE, THE DEPARTMENTS WILL BE TOUCHING ON SEVERAL CIP PSPS OVER THE COURSE OF THE DAY, AND WE HAVE AN OPEN TIME AT THE END FOR ANY GENERAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND QUESTIONS. IF YOU'RE ALL RIGHT WITH THAT, THAT'S FINE. I JUST WANTED TO KIND OF LET YOU KNOW. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU MAYOR.

THANK YOU MA'AM. COUNCIL MEMBER MOORE. I'D LIKE FOR OUR CITY MANAGER TO JUST ONCE AGAIN. GIVE US A RATIONALE AS IT RELATES TO THE ONE TIME BONUS TO EMPLOYEES. VERSUS. INCREASES IN SALARY. I THINK THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE DISCUSSED TODAY. CAN YOU GIVE US A RATIONALE AGAIN FOR.

THANK YOU, SIR. SO PRIMARILY, YOU KNOW, I TALKED ABOUT THIS BEING A BRIDGE YEAR TO GET TO NOVEMBER 2026. AND SO PRIMARILY IT IS BECAUSE IF WE'RE IF WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE THAT MONEY ONGOING, I DON'T WANT TO SPEND IT NOW AND COMMIT THE DOLLARS JUST TO NOT HAVE IT NEXT YEAR AND, AND ESSENTIALLY RUN INTO AN EVEN MORE DIFFICULT BUDGET SITUATION NEXT YEAR. AND SO I'D RATHER I WANT WE WANTED TO RECOGNIZE THE TEAM SOMEHOW AND STILL PROVIDE SOME, SOME PAY RECOGNITION IN THAT WAY, BUT NOT COMMIT THE DOLLARS LONG TERM UNTIL WE KNOW WHAT HAPPENS NEXT NOVEMBER. I T THINK THAS THE PRIMARY, THE PRIMARY ISSUE. AND SO AS WE OUTLINED, IT'S A IT'S A WE'RE PAYING FOR IT WITH ONE TIME DOLLARS BECAUSE THE ONGOING DOLLARS ARE IN QUESTION. AND WHETHER WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THOSE NEXT YEAR. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR.

[01:30:04]

COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS, PIGGYBACKING ON THAT. THANK YOU. I HAD SENT YOU WE DISCUSSED A NUMBER OF QUESTIONS. HOW HOW ARE WE GOING TO HANDLE THE RESPONSE TO THOSE, OR ARE YOU GOING TO HANDLE THEM? OR AT THE END OF THE SESSION, OR ARE THEY GOING TO BE INTEGRATED WITH THE DISCUSSION? HOW YOU PLAN ON HANDLING THESE QUESTIONS..O WE ARE PRO THOSE QUESTIONS WERE PROVIDING ANSWERS TO I THINK WE KIND OF TOUCHED ON SOME OF THE THINGS THAT ARE GOING TO BE RESPONSES. BUT ULTIMATELY WE HAVE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL THE QUESTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED BOTH BY YOU AND OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS. AND I THINK WE HAVE THAT READY TO GO OUT TODAY.

I SENT IT OUT ABOUT 730 THIS MORNING. OKAY, OKAY. ALL RIGHT. IF YOU'RE AN EARLY BIRD, I WASN'T READING, I WAS TRYING TO GET HERE, SO. OKAY. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. CITY MANAGER. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COUNCIL, BEFORE WE CONTINUE, WE'RE AT A NATURAL STOPPING POINT HERE, SO LET'S TAKE A RECESS. LET'S BE BACK AT 1015.

WE'RE IN RECESS.

GOOD MORNING, AND WELCOME BACK TO OUR AUGUST 16TH BUDGET WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE CITY

[2. Department presentations on FY26 Proposed Budget:]

COUNCIL. WE'LL MOVE ON TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO. IT'S DEPARTMENT PRESENTATIONS ON THE FISCAL YEAR 26 PROPOSED BUDGET. WE'LL START WITH OUR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT. GOOD MORNING MAYOR COUNCIL. MR. CITY MANAGER EXCITED TO BE THE FIRST DEPARTMENT TO GET TO GO THIS MORNING. JOINING ME THIS MORNING IIAVE CARRIE PACHECO. SHE'S OUR PARKS DIRECTOR AND I HAVE ALBERT MONTEIRO, OUR RECREATION DIRECTOR. BOTH WILL BE FORMALLY INTRODUCED AND YOU'LL GET A LITTLE BIT MORE BACKGROUND ON THEM. AT MONDAY NIGHT'S WORK SESSION. SO WE'LL JUST GET STARTED, SURF AND SWIM. THIS TOTAL ASK IS $1.4 MILLION. SURF AND SWIM IS SCHEDULED TO BE FINISHED. SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION NEXT MARCH AND SO OPEN FOR THE SUMMER SEASON. AND SUPER EXCITED. IT'S A BEAUTIFUL FACILITY. ANOTHER ONE OF THE 2019 BOND PROGRAMS THAT YOU ALL AND OUR CITIZENS CAN BE VERY PROUD OF. AND SO IN THAT ASK OF $1.4 MILLION, WE ARE LOOKING AT ONGOING FUNDING FOR THIS YEAR OF 759,000 AND THEN ONE TIME FUNDING OF 649. BUT YOU'LL NOTICE THAT LITTLE ASTERISKS AND THEY'VE TALKED ABOUT THAT IN THIS MORNING'S OVERVIEW, IS JUST DUE TO RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS. THAT $647,000 OF WHAT SHOULD BE ONGOING WILL BE FUNDED AS ONE TIME THIS YEAR. THE FUNDING THAT WE HAVE FOR THIS IS ASSOCIATED WITH A THE STAFFING. SO THE SEASONAL STAFFING THAT IT TAKES TO RUN THAT FACILITY AND TO JUST PUT THAT INTO PERSPECTIVE FOR YOU ALL THE FACILITY WHEN IT WAS OPEN BEFORE AS A WAVE POOL, REQUIRED NINE LIFEGUARDS. AND NOW WE HAVE ALL THESE NEW AMENITIES AND WE HAVE A LAZY RIVER AND SLIDES, AND WE'LL SHOW YOU SOME PICTURES ON THAT. BUT IT TAKES 28 TO 29 LIFEGUARDS JUST TO SAFELY STAFF THAT NEW OPERATION. SO THAT'S WHY YOU SEE SUCH AN INCREASE IN OUR SEASONAL STAFFING. IT ALSO IS GOING TOWARDS A FULL TIME EMPLOYEE IN THE PARK OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT TO BE ABLE TO HELP WITH THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT FACILITY. AND THEN OF COURSE, WE JUST NEED OPERATIONAL DOLLARS FOR THAT FACILITY. OKAY. SO SOME OF THE AMENITIES FOR THE NEW FACILITY, WE HAVE THREE SLIDES AND ACTIVITY POOL THAT WILL HAVE IN-WATER LOUNGERS. WE HAVE THE SURF SIMULATION MACHINE. WE HAVE THE CHILDREN'S WATER FEATURE THAT THEY CAN PLAY ON. LAZY RIVER CONCESSION STAND WITH A SEATING AREA, INDOOR PARTY ROOM, HAVE THREE SHADE LARGE SHADEDWEE STRUCTURES AT THE NEW FACILITY.

THIS NEXT REQUEST IS FOR PART MAINTENANCE. THIS IS FOR MAINTENANCE OF PARK PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN RECENTLY COMPLETED OR WILL BE UPCOMING IN THIS NEW FISCAL YEAR, AND THIS IS ONE TIME FUNDING FOR THIS YEAR IN THE AMOUNT OF $200,000. SO OVERALL, PARKS AND RECREATION. THE REQUEST FOR THE PROPOSED BUDGET IS $1.6 MILLION, WITH 759 OF THAT BEING FUNDED THROUGH ONE TIME. I'M SORRY, ONGOING FUNDING, AND THEN 849,000 THROUGH ONE TIME AGAIN

[01:35:01]

WITH THAT NOTE, THAT 647,000 IS REALLY ONGOING MONEY THAT WOULD BE REQUESTED AGAIN NEXT YEAR.

THAT IS BEING FUNDED AS ONE TIME. OOPS, SKIPPED TOO MANY. SO THE FEES. SO WE TALKED A LOT ABOUT FEES LAST YEAR WHEN WE OPENED HOLFORD RECREATION AND AQUATIC CENTER, AND WE WERE VERY METHODICAL WITH OUR PRICING OVER THERE AND KNOWING THAT SURF AND SWIM WOULD BE COMING ONLINE. SO THIS SHOWS YOU THE ADMISSION FEES FOR SURF AND SWIM. WHAT USED TO COST $6 AND $8 FOR THE WAVE POOL. AND THAT WAS AGAIN BASED ON AGE. SO AGES 2 TO 12, $6.13 AND UP IS $8. THE PROPOSED FEE IS NOW $10 AND $13, AND WE HAVE A RESIDENT AND A NONRESIDENT RATE. SAME STRUCTURE THAT WE DID FOR HOLFORD AQUATIC CENTER. AND THEN THE NONRESIDENT RATES ARE $14 AND $17. AND THEN WE ARE ALSO PROPOSING A COOLER FEE, WHICH AGAIN, THAT WAS SOMETHING NEW THAT WE IMPLEMENTED OVER AT HOLFORD AQUATIC CENTER THIS PAST SEASON. ALSO COUNT SOME OF YOU ALL MAY REMEMBER IN OUR DISCUSSIONS LAST YEAR, WE TALKED A LOT ABOUT THE AFTER HOUR RENTALS. AND SO AT THE WAVE POOL FORMERLY, YOU COULD RENT THE ENTIRE FACILITY FOR $600 ON A WEEKDAY AND $700 ON THE WEEKEND. AND WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING THIS YEAR IS $1,400 AFTER OUR RENTAL FEE FOR RESIDENTS, AND THEN AGAIN, ALIGNING WITH OUR DISCUSSION LAST YEAR ABOUT HOLFORD AQUATIC CENTER. WE HAVE A COMMERCIAL SLASH NONRESIDENT FEE OF $1,600, AND THAT WOULD BE AN AFTER HOURS RENTAL, AND IT WOULD BE FOR TWO HOURS. AND THEN WE HAVE OUR PAVILION. SO WE HAVE THREE SHADED STRUCTURES AT THE FACILITY. AND ONE OF THOSE CAN BE RENTED OUT. AND THAT'S $250 FOR RESIDENTS. THAT'S FOR ALL DAY RENTAL AND $330 FOR NONRESIDENTS. WE HAVE CABANAS THAT WILL BE A NEW FEATURE OVER AT THE FACILITY. IT'S FOR THREE HOURS, $45 FOR THE RESIDENT, AND THAT'S FOR THE THREE HOURS, NOT HOURLY AND $60 FOR NONRESIDENTS. AND THEN WE HAVE A PARTY ROOM SIMILAR AGAIN TO WHAT WE HAVE OVER AT HOLFORD HOLFORD AQUATIC CENTER, WITH A FEE OF $120 FOR RESIDENTS AND $160 FOR NONRESIDENTS. WE DIDN'T JUST COME UP WITH THESE FEES AND PULL THEM OUT OF THE AIR. WE DO BENCHMARKING AS PART OF OUR ANNUAL BUDGET EXERCISE, AND SO WE HAD TO LOOK AT COMPARABLE FACILITIES WITHIN THE METROPLEX. AND SO WHAT WE'VE OUTLINED FOR YOU ARE THE RESIDENT NONRESIDENT FOR YOUTH AND ADULTS. WE'VE GIVEN YOU WHAT THAT AVERAGE IS AND THEN WHAT OUR SURF AND SWIM PROPOSED FEES ARE, ARE THAT LAST LINE. SO YOU CAN SEE WHERE WE STAND WITH OUR PROPOSED FEES BASED ON THE BENCHMARK. SO FOR YOUTH RESIDENTS, THE AVERAGE IS $11.13 FOR THE FEE FOR WITHIN THE METROPLEX. AND WE ARE PROPOSING $10. AND THEN FOR ADULT RESIDENTS, THE AVERAGE IS $13.88. AND WE ARE PROPOSING A FEE OF $13 AS DISCUSSED EARLIER, THERE ARE, IF YOU'RE THINKING FUTURE, THERE ARE SOME OPERATIONAL COSTS FROM THE 2019 BOND PROGRAM, WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE CIP PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE. AND SO OF COURSE, WE'VE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT SURF AND SWIM AND SOME OF THE PARK OPERATIONS DOLLARS. AND THEN IN FISCAL YEAR 27, WE WILL HAVE THE GARLANDD SIOR ACTIVITY CENTER WILL BE COMING ONLINE. AND THERE IS GOING TO BE AN ASK OF ONE AND A HALF FTES FOR THAT FACILITY AND OPERATIONAL DOLLARS FOR THAT FACILITY, AND THEN MORE PARK MAINTENANCE DOLLARS WILL COME ONLINE JUST WITH NEW PROJECTS.

AND THEN THIS WAS ALSO DISCUSSED EARLIER, BUT JUST TO GIVE YOU SOME HISTORY. SO CIP AMENDMENT IS GOING TO BE COMING BEFORE COUNCIL AT THE UPCOMING WORK SESSION. AND PART OF THAT CIP AMENDMENT IS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT OF $500,000. AND SO I KNOW SOME OF YOU WHO HAVE EITHER SERVED ON PARK BOARD OR JUST THROUGH CONVERSATIONS, KNOW THAT WE ARE ALWAYS DEALING WITH AGING EQUIPMENT. SO JUST TO PUT IT INTO PERSPECTIVE, THIS $500,000 WILL GO TOWARDS 19 PIECES OF NEW EQUIPMENT. THAT'S SIX PIECES, SIX RIDING MOWERS, WHICH AGAIN, THOSE RANGE IN AGE FROM 8 TO 12 YEARS OLD. UTILITY TRACTORS, TEN NEW TRACTORS AGAIN 13 TO 26 YEARS OLD. SOME OF THOSE PIECES OF EQUIPMENT THAT OUR STAFF ARE HAVING TO UTILIZE, A FLATBED TRAILER THAT'S 37 YEARS OLD. I WISH I COULD HAVE SAID THAT IT WAS OLDER THAN ME, BUT I CAN'T. A FORKLIFT FOR 20

[01:40:04]

THAT'S 26 YEARS OLD, AND THEN A GATOR THAT IS 17 YEARS OLD. SO WE ARE IN DIRE NEED OF THIS REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT. IT GOES TO OBVIOUSLY BE ABLE TO HELP OUR STAFF DO THE JOBS THAT THEY NEED TO DO. I BELIEVE THAT WAS THE LAST SLIDE. SO WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU ALL MAY HAVE. THANK YOU. I THINK THAT 37 YEAR OLD TRAILERS, GIVEN OUR STREETS DEPARTMENT TRAILER AGE RUN FOR ITS MONEY THAT WE HAD A FEW CYCLES AGO. COUNCIL MEMBER BASS, THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION. APPRECIATE YOU GUYS AND I'M SURE I SHOULD KNOW THIS. I JUST DON'T SEE IT WRITTEN RIGHT HERE. AND SO I'M THINKING WHAT IS OUR WHEN ARE WE OPENING SURF AND SWIM? IT WILL BE OPEN NEXT SUMMER. IT IS NEXT. OKAY. AND THEN. SO THE SURF AND SWIM OKAY. SO THAT'S GOING TO BE OPEN THE FULL SEASON NEXT YEAR RIGHT OKAY. THAT'S CORRECT THEN. SO MY QUESTION IS LIKE FOR EXAMPLE ON SLIDE FOUR. YOU KNOW WE'VE GOT SOME WE'VE GOT SOME NEW NEW THINGS ON THERE, SOME NEW MAINTENANCE ITEMS, SOME ITEM MAINTENANCE ITEMS ON SOME NEW PLACES HERE.

OKAY. SO MY QUESTION IS LIKE, YOU KNOW, LIKE SURF IS GOING TO BE OPEN THE ENTIRE SEASON, RIGHT? SO WE HAVE THE ONGOING IS GOING TO BE PRETTY MUCH THE SAME THE FOLLOWING YEAR PLUS INFLATION. BUT ON SOME OF THE ITEMS THAT YOU KNOW, MAYBE HAVE, THEY MIGHT HAVE MORE MAINTENANCE COST IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE THIS IS AN NOT AN ENTIRE YEAR PRESENT ON HERE. SO I'M JUST CURIOUS WHAT IT'S GOING TO LOOK LIKE IN THE FUTURE FOR SOME OF THESE. SO FOR SOME OF THESE, WE WOULD HAVE TO ACCOUNT A LOT OF THIS IS CONTRACT DOLLARS. SO WE WOULD JUST HAVE TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY INCREASES COST TO CONTRACTS EACH. USUALLY WE TRY AND KEEP THEM TO WHATEVER THE NATIONAL INFLATION AVERAGE IS TO TRY AND HOLD THEM TO THAT SO WE CAN PLAN FOR THAT PROPERLY THROUGH OUR BUDGET PROCESS. OKAY. I WANT TO SAY THIS YEAR WE ADDED ABOUT 5%, I THINK, TO OUR CONTRACT MOWING.

OKAY. YEAH. I'M JUST I'M OKAY. I'M JUST CURIOUS ABOUT HOW MUCH YOU KNOW, THESE ARE GOING TO BE INCREASED AGAIN ONCE THEY BECOME YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? ONCE YOU HAVE A FULL YEAR OF MAINTENANCE ON THEM AS OPPOSED TO JUST HAVING SO SOME. SO THIS LIST, SOME OF THIS LIST PROJECTS ARE ALREADY COMPLETED AND SOME OF THEM WILL BE COMING ONLINE. SO IF WE NEED TO GO BACK THROUGH AND SHOW YOU WHAT A FULL YEAR WOULD LOOK LIKE. SO FOR EXAMPLE, WHEN JOYCE COMMUNITY PARK MAINTENANCE, OF COURSE IT WON'T BE FINISHED AT THE START OF THE YEAR, FISCAL YEAR, SO WE CAN BRING THAT INFORMATION BACK OR PROVIDE THAT BACK TO COUNCIL IF NEED TO. WELL, YEAH, I DON'T KNOW. I GUESS I'M JUST LOOKING FORWARD HOW MUCH THAT'S GOING TO CHANGE IN THE FUTURE TOO. OKAY.

BUT THE SURF AND SWIM, THAT'S THE BIG ONE RIGHT. THAT'S THE BIG ONE. THESE AREN'T QUITE AS BIG. I WAS JUST CURIOUS ON THE SURF AND SWIM IF THAT'S A THAT'S A FULL. SO THAT IS A FULL SEASON ALREADY IN HERE. YES. I WAS WONDERING WHAT KIND OF, YOU KNOW, ARE WE GOING TO TAKE A BIG HIT THE FOLLOWING YEAR WHEN IT'S A FULL SEASON? BUT WE DON'T ANTICIPATE THAT. YEAH, THAT WAS MY BIG QUESTION ON THAT. OKAY. COOL. THANK YOU. AND THEN ON THE. ON THE SLIDE SEVEN ON THE PAVILION RENTAL AND CABANA AND PARTY ROOM AND ALL THAT. SO THIS IS NEW. WE HAVEN'T DONE THAT BEFORE. RIGHT. SO I'M JUST CURIOUS ABOUT THE PLAN TO, YOU KNOW, TO MONITOR THAT, YOU KNOW, MONITOR THE LIKE THE USAGE OF THE PAVILION, THE USAGE OF THE CABANA RENTALS, JUST, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE WE HAVE A PLAN JUST TO KEEP PEOPLE FROM JUST GOING IN THERE AND SITTING DOWN AND BASICALLY SQUATTING. YES, WE'LL HAVE STAFFING AVAILABLE TO BE ABLE TO HANDLE THAT. ALL OF THAT AND THE RESERVATIONS. OKAY. OKAY. THAT SEEMS LIKE IT'S GOING TO BE A INTERESTING THING TO TRY TO CONTROL. SOMEONE SEES SOMETHING THAT I WANT TO SIT THERE AND THEY GO, YOU KNOW, WELL, AND THEY HAVE, YOU KNOW, SIGNAGE, FOR EXAMPLE, WHERE MAYBE IF IT'S NOT RENTED OUT, BUT IT WILL HAVE A SIGN, AN A FRAME, A FRAME SIGN, MAYBE, OR SOMETHING ON THE TABLE THAT SAYS, HEY, IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN THIS SPACE, YOU CAN RENT IT OUT. HERE'S HOW YOU DO THAT. AND WE CAN BLOCK OFF AREAS IF THEY ARE INTENENDED NOT TO BE UTILIZD BY EVERYBODY. OKAY. COOL.

AWESOME. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. MAYOR PRO TEM, HELLO. WELCOME TO THE TEAM.

WE'RE REALLY HAPPY TO HAVE YOU. THANK YOU. SO ON THE PARK MAINTENANCE SLIDE FOR KINGSLEY PARK MAINTENANCE. WHAT'S GOING ON THERE? SO WHEN YOU SEE MAINTENANCE DOLLARS, IT'S LITERALLY THE MOWING. IT'S THE UPKEEP. YOU KNOW, WEED EATING. IT'S THOSE TYPES OF THINGS. SO IT'S NOT THIS DOES NOT COVER ANYTHING. IF A REPAIR NEEDED TO HAPPEN AN EMERGENCY REPAIR WE WOULD HAVE TO FIND THAT WITHIN OUR OPERATING BUDGET. THIS IS JUST STRICTLY MAINTENANCE DOLLARS TO UPKEEP IT. THERE'S NOTHING TO REPAIR THERE. NOT YET. NOT YET. YES. AND THEN GRAFFITI REMOVAL. DOES THAT INCLUDE FUNDS FOR JOHN COMER SKATE PARK? BECAUSE I KNOW

[01:45:04]

THAT'S DONE LIKE ON A WEEKLY BASIS. DO YOU KNOW WHEN THAT FENCE IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED? YOU'RE CURRENTLY WORKING THROUGH THAT RIGHT NOW. IT'S ACTUALLY IN PROCESS. AND THEN LET ME GO BACK TO THE GRAFFITI REMOVAL. WE'VE ALWAYS HAD A LINE ITEM IN THE PARK OPERATIONS BUDGET FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL. THIS IS JUST ADDING DOLLARS TO IT, JUST TO THE INCREASE THAT WE SEE WITH THROUGHOUT THE PARK SYSTEM. OKAY. WELL HOPEFULLY THAT NUMBER WILL DECREASE ONCE THERE'S A FENCE THERE. HOPEFULLY THAT'LL HELP. I THINK THAT WAS ALL I HAD. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

WELCOME, MA'AM. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS, THANK YOU. THANK YOU. EXCELLENT PRESENTATION. JUST A FEW NOTES. ONE, THOSE SAID RENDERING FOR SERVING SWIMS STILL ON DISPLAY DOWN AT THE REC CENTER. YES OKAY OKAY OKAY. PLEASE HAVE IT AVAILABLE FOR THE TOWN HALL. I DON'T HAVE A DATE YET, BUT BUT YOU'LL YOU'LL GET THAT INFORMATION. OF COURSE. SECONDLY. DO YOU HAVE.

MAINTENANCE ONGOING MAINTENANCE FOR CERTAIN. FOR CERTAIN SWIM. EXPLAIN AGAIN THAT IS THAT MONEY COMING FROM. AND IS THAT A ONE TIME COST OR IS ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE TO COME BACK NEXT YEAR AND RE-UP THAT MAINTENANCE COST. SO THE TOTAL ASK FOR THE SURF AND SWIM IS $1.4 MILLION. PART OF THAT IS STAFFING. PART OF THAT IS THE MAINTENANCE, THE WAY THAT BUDGET AND IF THEY WANT TO CHIME IN, CAN HELP OUT. BUT THEY'RE FUNDING 759,000 OF THAT OUT OF ONGOING MONEY FOR THIS YEAR, AND THEN THIS $647,000 THAT SHOULD BE ONGOING IS BEING FUNDED THROUGH ONE TIME FUNDING THIS YEAR. SO AGAIN, NEXT YEAR WE'D COME BACK AND ASK FOR IT AS ONGOING OR IN BUDGET WORK WITH BUDGET ON WHETHER THAT WOULD BE AGAIN FUNDED AS ONE TIME OR PUT INTO THE BUDGET AS ONGOING. IT WILL BE DONE. IT WILL BE LOOKED AT YEARLY. RIGHT? RIGHT. YES. UNTIL PUT IN AS ONGOING. OKAY, OKAY, OKAY. I SAW A COMPLAINT OR. I HAVE SOME SENSE FROM THAT. YOU NAME THIS THE CENTER.

AUDUBON. NO, THE ALFRED. I SAW A COMPLAINT. LOOKED LIKE IT HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE USE OF AQUATICS OVER THERE. I DON'T I DON'T REMEMBER WHAT IT WAS, BUT A LADY COMPLAINED ABOUT FEES AND WHAT HAPPENED TO IT. I DON'T KNOW, BUT. BUT YOUR FEE SCHEDULE AND YOU MENTIONED AFTER HOURS.

DO YOU HAVE A FEE SCHEDULE FOR SENIORS FOR RENTAL? IF SO, WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE? WE DON'T HAVE THAT INTO OUR FEE STRUCTURE RIGHT NOW. IT IS SOMETHING THAT IF COUNCIL WISHES FOR US TO GO BACK AND LOOK AT, WE COULD DEFINITELY DO. DO YOU HAVE? THOSE FOR SENIORS AT AT THE OTHER FACILITIES AT THE RECREATION CENTERS FOR THE FITNESS THEY HAVE, THEY HAVE POOLS. OH NO. NO. DO YOU HAVE THAT HAVE SIMILAR SPACE RENTALS. DO YOU HAVE HAVE THOSE FACILITIES. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THAT SLIDE? I CAN'T ON THE FEES. NO. YEAH. THAT RIGHT THERE. DO YOU DO YOU HAVE DO WE HAVE A FACILITY WITH SIMILAR LAYOUT. SO THE ONLY THING THAT WOULD BE SIMILAR FOR EXAMPLE THE PARTY ROOM. SO WE HAVE THAT AT HOLFORD AQUATICS AND WE HAVE THAT. WE HAVE PARTY ROOMS AVAILABLE AT ALL OF OUR RECREATION CENTERS AND SENIOR CENTERS. SO THE ONLY DISCOUNT YOU HAVE WITH THAT, WITH THAT SAID, DO YOU HAVE A SENIOR RENTAL RATE FOR THOSE AT AT HOLFORD? NO. ARE YOU THINKING ABOUT THINKING ABOUT CONSIDERING A SENIOR RATE FOR THE FACILITY? WE WEREN'T AT THIS TIME PROPOSING A SENIOR RATE. AND MAY I ASK WHY? IT'S JUST AS PART AS THE FEE STRUCTURE AT THIS TIME. IT WAS JUST NOT SOMETHING THAT CAME UP AS A PRIORITY, EITHER IN THE MASTER PLAN OR THROUGH OUR CONVERSATIONS. BUT IF IT IS PRIORITY FOR COUNCIL, WE CAN DEFINITELY GO BACK AND LOOK. THERE ARE SOME FACILITIES THAT OFFER SOME DISCOUNTS LIKE THAT THROUGHOUT THE METROPLEX AND WE CAN EXPLORE THAT. WELL, I JUST MENTIONED THAT BECAUSE HOPEFULLY SURF AND SWIM WILL BECOME A REGIONAL, NOT JUST A GARLAND. AND ATTRACTING SENIORS FROM OTHER AREAS, WHETHER THEY ARE GRANDMAS OR WHATEVER, YOU YOU YOU MAY WANT TO CONSIDER, NOT

[01:50:01]

NECESSARILY FIRST YEAR, BUT DOWN THE LINE LOOKING AT COMING UP WITH A SENIOR STRUCTURE TO ATTRACT MORE VISITORS. SO AND ON THAT NOTE, THE ONLY SENIOR FEE THAT WE HAVE AVAILABLE. SO THE FITNESS PASSES AT REC CENTERS WE HAVE A SENIOR FEE. BUT IT IS FOR SEORS SPECIFICALLY. SO IF YOU'RE A NON RESIDENT AND A SENIOR YOU STILL PAY THE REGULAR RATE. SO THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD ALSO HAVE TO LOOK AT OKAY OKAY. AND THAT WOULD BE GOOD. BUT BUT BUT AT LEAST INITIALLY FOR GUIDANCE FOR GARLAND RESIDENTS. THAT WOULD THAT WOULD BE BECAUSE I HAVE A, A LARGE SENIOR CITIZEN POPULATION IN MY DISTRICT. SO IT WOULD IT AGAIN NOT NOT OUT OF THE GATE, BUT SOMETHING TO ATTRACT THEM SO THAT THEY THEY WOULD FEEL MORE INVOLVED. IT IT IT MAY BE FEASIBLE. IT MAY NOT. I'LL LET YOU MAKE THE DETERMINATION. BUT I'VE BEEN ASKED BY A NUMBER OF SENIORS WHO HEARD ABOUT THAT THAT AND, AND SO THAT THAT WOULD MAY BE OPPORTUNITIES TO, TO ATTRACT ANOTHER GROUP OF PEOPLE. RIGHT, RIGHT. OTHERWISE EXCELLENT REPORT. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. I LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING ALL THE GRANDMAS ON THE WAVERIDER WHEN WE OPEN UP. YEAH, YEAH, YEAH, YEAH, YEAH. YOU'D BE SURPRISED. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER BEARD. OKAY. THANKS. LEE. WE DISCUSSED THIS BEFORE THE MEETING. CAN YOU ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF THE PART TIME POLICE OFFICER NOT BEING INCLUDED IN THE BUDGET? SO IT'S NOT IN THE PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THIS YEAR. AND SO IF WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO OFFER THAT PROGRAM, WHETHER IT'S AT THE SAME LEVEL THAT WE HAD IT BEFORE OR SOME SORT OF REDUCED SCHEDULE, WE WOULD NEED TO FIND THAT WITHIN OUR OPERATING BUDGET. AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE ARE LOOKING INTO BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN A BENEFIT TO THE PARK SYSTEM. SO WE'RE LOOKING INTO THAT. OKAY. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER MOORE THANK YOU. LEE JOHN PAUL JONES SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN ON THE CHOPPING BLOCK, NOT NECESSARILY CONSTRUCTION BLOCK, FOR QUITE SOME YEARS NOW, QUITE SOME TIME.

AND I STILL DON'T SEE IT ANY PLACE IN THE WAY OF THE MAINTENANCE AND THE WAY OF SOMETHING THAT'S EXCITING THAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE FINISHING UP. CAN YOU GIVE ME SOME INSIGHTS ON WHAT'S HAPPENING THERE? SO JOHN PAUL JONES IS STILL UNDER REVIEW WITH DALLAS WATER UTILITIES.

IT'S CURRENTLY UNDER THAT REVIEW PROCESS. IT'S A LENGTHY PROCESS. SO IT IS NOT PROJECTED TO BE FINISHED WITHIN THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR. SO BECAUSE OF THAT, YOU'RE NOT SEEING IT AS INCLUDED IN MAINTENANCE DOLLARS. HOW MANY YEARS NOW HAVE WE BEEN DEALING WITH THIS ONE. OH, OKAY. THAT'S GOING TO I'M GOING TO HAVE TO. YOU'RE NOT THAT OLD EITHER. I'LL HAVE TO PHONE A FRIEND. ALRIGHT.

I REALLY WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOMETHING THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO EVEN TALK ABOUT, BUT I THINK THAT WE REALLY NEED TO SEE SOMETHING IN THE WAY OF SOME IMPROVEMENTS OR SOME PROGRESS OR SOMETHING THAT RELATES TO THAT PARK. IT'S BEEN I KNOW I'VE BEEN A COUNCIL MEMBER FOR FIVE YEARS, AND THIS WAS AN ISSUE EVEN BEFORE THEN. SO MONIES WERE ALLOCATED, AS I RECALL, FOR THE PROJECTS. WE ARE GIVING YOU AN UPDATE ON MONDAY ON WHEN JOYCE WILL GIVE YOU AN UPDATE ON THAT AND JOHN PAUL JONES. SO HOPEFULLY THAT MAYBE WILL ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS. MR. MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. COUNCIL MEMBER DUTTON, I WOULD LIKE TO AGREE WITH. I'M SORRY, I JUST WENT CRAZY FOR A SECOND WITH BJ. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SEE SOME SENIOR RATES FOR THE POOLS, ESPECIALLY SINCE ONE OF THE BIGGEST. POINTS OF CONTENTION WITH THE SENIOR CENTER IS NOT HAVING AQUATICS THERE. I WOULD LIKE TO GIVE THAT, GIVE THEM THAT LITTLE, GIVE THEM THAT LITTLE TIDBIT OF INCENTIVE TO GO CHECK OUT THE OTHER POOLS IN SENIORS ON THE WAVERIDER WOULD BE FANTASTIC.

JUST SAYING. YOU MIGHT BREAK SOMETHING, BUT I THINK THAT THAT WOULD BE A NICE LITTLE, A NICE LITTLE TOKEN THAT WE COULD GIVE THEM JUST A FEW BUCKS OFF OR WHATEVER IT MAY BE. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, MA'AM. COUNCIL MEMBER THOMAS YES, I, I KNOW THAT HOLFORD IS IN MY DISTRICT IN DISTRICT SEVEN, AND I'M LOVING THE HOLFORD AQUATIC CENTER AND HEARING GREAT THINGS ABOUT IT. BUT I HAD ONE LADY THAT SENT ME A THING. YOU'RE CHARGING WAY TOO MUCH. $8 IS TOO MUCH. I CAN SWIM AT BARFIELD FOR $3. AND IT'S LIKE BARFIELD IS NOT THE SAME AS HOLFORD. MADAM, IF YOU WANT TO SWIM LAPS, THERE'S A SPOT FOR YOU AT HOLFORD. BUT IT'S NOT QUITE THE SAME. AND SHE, SHE AND. MR. HESTER GAVE ME SOME FACTS ABOUT HOW WE GOT TO OUR RATES. AND THERE WERE WELL REASONED TO ME AND I AND HIS THING. WE HE SAID WE DON'T OFFER A SEASON PASS.

[01:55:02]

AND WE THOUGHT ABOUT THAT MAYBE FOR THE FOLLOWING YEAR. LET'S KIND OF PLAY IT BY EAR. SO I DON'T SEE ANYTHING ON HERE ABOUT SEASON PASSES. THIS LADY WAS SAYING, I CAN GO OVER TO RICHARDSON AND GET A SEASON PASS FOR $65 AS A NONRESIDENT. AND SO ANY PLANS FOR THAT FOR NEXT SEASON? WE ARE LOOKING AT THAT FOR HOLFORD. SO SOME OF YOU THAT WERE PART OF THE BUDGET PRESENTATION REMEMBER MAY REMEMBER LAST YEAR WE'RE DOING THE SAME METHODOLOGY FOR SURF AS WE WANT TO HAVE ONE YEAR OF OPERATION TO KIND OF SEE, YOU KNOW, WHAT ARE THE BUSIEST TIMES. WHAT ARE THE PEAK TIMES, WHAT IS EVERYTHING LOOK LIKE. AND SO FOR HOLFORD, WE ARE EXPLORING A SEASON PASS FOR NEXT YEAR. WE JUST HAVEN'T FLESHED ALL OF THAT OUT. SO THAT IS SOMETHING BECAUSE THAT HAS BEEN ONE OF THE HIGHLY REQUESTED THINGS THAT WE HEAR FROM PEOPLE WHEN THEY'RE COMING OVER TO VISIT. OKAY. YEAH. AND I YOU KNOW, RICHARDSON, I KNOW THERE'S CHALLENGES WITH THAT. AND I KNOW BUT RICHARDSON SEEMS TO HAVE FIGURED THEM OUT. SO MAYBE WE CAN TALK TO THEM AND SEE HOW THEY OVERCAME SOME OF THOSE CHALLENGES. BUT SO WHEN WE SEE SOMETHING ON THAT WHERE YOU'VE SAID, OKAY, WE'VE DECIDED THAT SEASON PASS IS A GOOD IDEA AND HERE'S HOW MUCH WE WOULD CHARGE FOR SEASON PASS. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT POOL PASS. WE WOULD BRING THAT FORWARD. I MEAN, IT'S NOT PART OF THIS PROPOSED BUDGET BECAUSE WE'RE STILL WORKING THROUGH THOSE DETAILS. WE WANTED TO GET THROUGH, LIKE I SAID, THE FULL SUMMER OPERATION. SO I GUESS WE WOULD BRING THAT FORWARD AS AN AMENDMENT OR WE WOULD ADD IT TO THE FEES, AND THEN IT WOULD BE ADDED IN NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET. SO, OKAY, SO NEXT SUMMER, SO YOU YOU WOULD HAVE SOMETHING, WE WOULD HAVE A WE WOULD AMEND THE BUDGET TO ADD SOMETHING LIKE THAT GOING FORWARD OR HELP, HELP ME UNDERSTAND WHEN, WHEN CAN I TELL THIS LADY WHAT THE FEE IS GOING TO BE. SO FEES ARE ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE. WE DO UPDATE FEES THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF THE YEAR. OF COURSE, ANY REVENUE IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE WOULD NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED AND BROUGHT TO COUNCIL. SO IF THIS IS SOMETHING YOU WANT PARK STAFF TO UPDATE THE COUNCIL ON BEFORE NEXT SUMMER SEASON, WE COULD WORK WITH THEM AND TRY TO BRING THAT IN EARLY, MAYBE CIP TIME, BUT JUST KNOW THAT IF THERE'S GOING TO BE A REVENUE IMPACT ASSOCIATED WITH IT, THE COUNCIL MAY HAVE TO REALLY REVIEW THAT REQUEST AND POTENTIALLY REVIEW AN IMPACT TO OUR EXPENDITURES AS WE PRESENT A BALANCED BUDGET, OR IF IT'S NOT NECESSARILY NOT SAYING IT'S NOT A PRIORITY BUT NOT URGENT FOR THE UPCOMING SEASON, THEN WE COULD INCORPORATE IT INTO THE FY 27 BUDGET PROCESS. SO THERE'S REALLY TWO PATHS OKAY. AND BY REVENUE IMPACT YOU MEAN OFFERING A SEASON PASS MIGHT MEAN LESS REVENUE THAN ALL THE ONE TIME FEE CHARGING ONE TIME FEES. IS THAT MY UNDERSTANDING? YOU'RE YOUR DEPARTMENT TO RESEARCH THAT. YEAH. OKAY. OKAY. VERY GOOD. YEAH. I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING WE NEED. I DO WANT IT TO LOOK AT THAT BECAUSE I AM GETTING ASKED ABOUT IT. AND I'VE TALKED TO THE FRONT DESK DOWN THERE. THAT'S THEIR NUMBER ONE. ASK WHEN CAN WE DO. WHAT ABOUT SEASON PASS? AND OF COURSE WHO'S GOING TO CLOSE IN A MONTH OR SO. AND SO THERE'S NO REASON TO DO IT THIS YEAR. BUT I'M THINKING FOR NEXT SEASON, THAT'S SOMETHING WE REALLY WANT TO LOOK AT HARD. IT'S BEEN REQUESTED A LOT. SO LET'S UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT I AGREE WITH THAT. BUT SOMETHING THAT I WANT US TO REALLY LOOK AT AND SEE HOW SEE IF WE CAN FIGURE THAT OUT. I DO APPRECIATE YOU BRINGING UP CITY OF RICHARDSON. I ACTUALLY COMMUNICATE A LOT WITH THEM, AND WE ARE ACTUALLY IN CONVERSATIONS WITH THEM ABOUT THE SEASON PASS AND HOW THEY MONITOR THAT WITH CAPACITY THAT'S ALLOWED IN AND JUST CHALLENGES THAT THAT POSES. OKAY I SEE. YEAH. VERY GOOD. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. AND I'D ASK ALSO JUST TO ADD ON IF YOU WOULD LOOK INTO A CITYWIDE AQUATICS PASS AS PART OF THAT. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT RICHARDSON DOES AS WELL RATHER THAN JUST INDIVIDUAL HOLFORD AQUATICS PASS. COUNCILMEMBER DUTTON I LIKE THE AQUATICS PASS. THAT'S A GREAT IDEA. SO FOR THE 2026 SEASON, WHILE WE'RE LOOKING AT DIFFERENT RATES AND THINGS, I KNOW ONCE WE FINISH OUT THE YEAR, WE'LL HAVE A TIME TO SIT BACK AND KIND OF ASSESS HOW THE YEAR WENT. NOW, SINCE INDOORS DID NOT WORK FOR ME AND I BROKE MYSELF, WE SPENT MORE TIME OUTDOORS AT HOLFORD, AND THERE WERE QUITE A FEW TIMES THAT WE WENT, AND THERE JUST WERE NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE. AND I KNOW THAT PROBABLY SOME OF THAT IS PEOPLE NOT KNOWING THAT IT'S BACK OPEN, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO MAYBE PLAY WITH THE IDEA OF MAYBE LIKE A PEAK AND OFF PEAK HOURS, JUST MAYBE, THAT WE CAN DRAW MORE PEOPLE IN DURING THE WEEK, IF THAT, YOU KNOW, IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE FEASIBLE. BECAUSE, I MEAN, WE DO HEAR SOME PEOPLE SAY LIKE THAT THE RATES ARE HIGHER OR WHATEVER, BUT IF WE COULD GET PEOPLE KIND OF, YOU KNOW, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY WHEN WE FIRST OPEN FOR THOSE FEW HOURS, IT'S PRETTY SLOW. SO IF WE CAN, I

[02:00:03]

WOULD RATHER TAKE A COUPLE OF DOLLARS OFF AND GET MORE PEOPLE IN TO COVER OUR COSTS. IF THAT IS SOMETHING THAT MIGHT BE FEASIBLE, I THINK. I THINK THAT MIGHT HELP US, EVEN IF WE ONLY DO IT FOR A YEAR OR TWO UNTIL WE GET, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE REALIZING THAT WE ARE UP AND RUNNING AND THAT IT'S A FANTASTIC POOL. AND ALSO, I WOULD LIKE TO FIND PEOPLE THAT BRING GLASS IN AND BREAK OUR POOLS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR PARKS AND REC? COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS. YOU REMINDED ME OF THAT. JUST WHY ARE YOU CONSIDERING ALL THIS? PERHAPS FOR AQUATICS, YOU MAY, IN CONSIDERING THE SEASON PASSES, THE DISCOUNT OR DISCOUNT PASSES WE CONSIDER A. MONITOR THE TIMES OF DAYS AND MAYBE OFFER. A AN AQUATIC OPPORTUNITY OR AN INDOOR OPPORTUNITY OR OTHERWISE FOR SENIORS. FOR SENIORS ONLY, FOR. SIX, NINE TO FROM 9 TO 10 OR OR SOME. SOME. SOME SOME OUTLANDISH TIME SLOT AND JUST FOR TRIAL AND TRY IT OUT AT YOUR AT ALL THE FACILITIES OR PICK ONE. OKAY, I DON'T CARE SERVING SWIM OR HARTFORD PICK ONE AND SEE IF THAT WORKS. AND IF YOU NEED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS BEFORE ROLLING OUT TO ALL OF YOU. BUT THAT'S ANOTHER IDEA THAT I HAD FOR THAT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COUNCIL? I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY I THINK THE FEES AT HOLFORD ARE VERY REASONABLE.

I'VE HOSTED A NINE YEAR OLD BIRTHDAY PARTY THERE ALREADY THIS SUMMER. ALL THE KIDS HAD A WONDERFUL TIME, RENTED A COUPLE CABANAS AND THEY ALL ENJOYED CERTAINLY ENJOYED THEIR TIME THERE. SO I KNOW THAT WHEN SURF AND SWIM COMES ONLINE, IT' EVEN BIGGER AND BETTER COMPLEX THERE AND EVEN BETTER VALUE. SO THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR TIME AND THANK YOU FOR THIS PRESENTATION. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR NEXT PRESENTATION. IT'S THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF LEE.

YOU CAN TELL I DIDN'T DO IT, CAN'T YOU? COUNCILMAN? MR. MAYOR, COUNCIL, CITY STAFF HONORED TO BE HERE TODAY. THIS IS A NEW ADVENTURE FOR MARK LEE. I'M USUALLY HERE ASKING YOU FOR MONEY TODAY. I'M TRYING TO RAISE IT, SO WE'LL SEE HOW WE GO HERE. PROPOSED EMS FEE SCHEDULE. WE HAVE HAD MANY DISCUSSIONS IN THE PAST ABOUT OUR EMS FEES, AND WE'RE HERE AGAIN THIS YEAR.

WE'RE LOOKING TO RAISE OUR FEES. THE CURRENT FEES CHARGED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ARE NOT OPTIMIZED FOR RECOVERY OF ANY OF OUR COSTS, OR VERY MINIMUM OF OUR COSTS THAT WE HAVE OUT THERE. EACH EMS AGENCY IN TEXAS IS ALLOWED TO SET THEIR FEES FOR THE SERVICES THAT THEY PROVIDE.

COMMERCIAL INSURANCE REIMBURSES US BASED ON THEIR POLICIES AND COVERAGES, WHICH CAN VARY FROM COMPANY TO COMPANY. AS YOU WELL KNOW, SIMILAR TO YOUR INSURANCE THAT YOU PAY YOUR PHYSICIAN, THEY ALL CONTRACT DIFFERENTLY. GOVERNMENTAL PAYERS LIKE MEDICARE AND MEDICAID. THEY ESTABLISH THE FEES THAT THEY WILL PAY. IT'S NOT NEGOTIABLE FOR US OR ANYBODY ELSE.

CURRENTLY, GARLAND FIRE DEPARTMENT CHARGES LESS THAN WHAT MEDICARE ALLOWABLE IS FOR AN ALS TO CALL. AN ALS TO CALL IS ONE IN WHICH WE PROVIDE THREE ADVANCED SKILLS OR INTERVENTIONAL METHODS ON THE PATIENT. SO CURRENTLY, MEDICARE ALLOWS $759.79. GARLAND IS CHARGING $675. SO THIS THIS SHOULD GIVE YOU A GOOD IDEA OF WHERE WE ARE IN THE MARKET. OF NOTE, COMMERCIAL PAYERS WILL PAY THE LESSER OF THE DEPARTMENT'S FEE, OR 325% OF MEDICARE RATE.

SO IF YOU TAKE THAT SAME 759 THAT THEY WILL PAY, IT GETS UP AROUND $2,600. IF THEY WILL

[02:05:06]

ALLOW FOR AN ALS TO CALL. AND WE'RE ONLY CHARGING 675 TO THE COMMERCIAL INSURANCE COMPANIES AS WELL. FEE SCHEDULES SHOULD ENABLE AN AGENCY TO CAPTURE THE MOST REVENUE FROM THEIR COMMERCIAL INSURANCE. THAT'S THAT'S WHO OUR OUR TARGET MARKET WOULD BE FOR EMS FEES. AGAIN, THE GOVERNMENT RATES ARE SET PRIVATE PAY IS NOT A BIG PAYER IN OUR CITY FOR THE UNINSURED.

SO WE'RE LOOKING TO MAXIMIZE REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE COMMERCIAL INSURANCE AND ALIGN THE AGENCY WITH CURRENT INDUSTRY PRACTICES. FOR COMPARISON DATA. HERE'S WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING.

ALS TWO CALLS $1,750. AGAIN, THE COMMERCIAL INSURANCE ALLOWS WHAT WE WOULD BILL OR UP TO THAT 325%. SO ROUGH NUMBERS, $2,600 WOULD BE ALLOWABLE. THE BLS NON-EMERGENCY WOULD GO TO 1350.

MILEAGE FEE GOES UP TO $24. A DISPOSABLES FEE FOR ADVANCED CARE AND BLS CARE. OXYGEN RATE TREATMENT. NO TRANSPORT. I KNOW THAT EVERYBODY IS LOOKING AT THIS AND IS IN SHOCK RIGHT NOW.

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

AND THEN WE WOULD COME IN BEHIND IT. SO THE DEDUCTIBLES HAVE BEEN MET. CO-PAYS ARE LIKELY TO HAVE BEEN MET AS WELL. AND WE WILL TAKE WHAT THE COMMERCIAL INSURANCE PROVIDES FOR US AND WRITE OFF THE REST OF THAT BILL. SO BIGGEST CONCERN IS FOR OUR RESIDENTS. THEY'RE THE ONES THAT

[02:10:01]

PAY THE TAXES IN THE CITY. THEY'RE THE ONES THAT ALLOW US TO PROVIDE THEIR SERVICES. AND SO WE WANT TO TAKE CARE OF THEM. AND IF EY CAN'T PAY, THEY CAN'T PAY. WE'RE GOING TO WRITE IT OFF. THE. BILLING AGENCY WOULD BE EXPECTED TO TRACK RESIDENT WRITE OFFS, SO WE COULD SEE WHAT WE ARE WRITING OFF AND WHAT WHAT WE'RE COLLECTING AS WELL. BUT THE RESIDENT WRITE OFF POLICY COMES IN CONFLICT WITH THE CHARITY CARE POLICY. MANY OF YOU SEE ME HERE MANY TIMES ADJUSTING OUR CHARITY CARE POLICY. THE CHARITY CARE POLICY ALLOWS ME TO SEND ALL PATIENTS A BILL IF THEY ARE 400% OR OR LESS ABOVE THE POVERTY LINE, THEN WE APPLY THAT TO CHARITY CARE. THIS USED TO BE A GOOD WAY FOR US TO RECEIVE MONEY FROM THE STATE, AND THEY WOULD HELP COVER A LOT OF THE CHARITY CARE PROVIDED. THERE WERE TIMES IN MY CAREER HERE THAT WE'VE COLLECTED UP TO THE 3 MILLION OR SO ON CHARITY CARE. THAT NUMBER IS DOWN TO LESS THAN 300,000 NOW. SO I THINK THE TIME FOR US TO ADJUST FROM CHARITY CARE TO JUST FULL RESIDENT WRITE OFF IS PROBABLY ALONG THE SAME LINE. PROMPT PAY DISCOUNTS. I TALKED ABOUT THAT. IF YOU ARE UNINSURED OR NON TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE COMMERCIAL INSURED PATIENT, WHICH IS ALL OF THE BIG CARRIERS, THE BILLING COMPANY WOULD WOULD BE AUTHORIZED TO ALLOW A 25 TO 40% DISCOUNT IF SOMEBODY WANTED TO PAY THAT NON RESIDENTS SAME THING, THEY COULD GET THAT SAME DISCOUNT IF THEY IF THEY ASK FOR IT. AND AGAIN WE JUST TALKED ABOUT THE CHARITY CARE AND THE SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT PROGRAM. WE WOULD PROPOSE TO GET RID OF THAT PROGRAM AND JUST USE RESIDENT WRITE OFF FOR OUR RESIDENTS. NONRESIDENTS WOULD STILL BE BILLED. CASPER TRANSPORT IS A TERM THAT IS USED IN EMS INDUSTRY. IT'S THE DOLLARS COLLECTED AND BUILD OUT TO INSURANCE PAYERS FOR A PARTICULAR CLAIM. IT WILL VARY BY PAYER. AGAIN, GOVERNMENT PAYERS ARE PRETTY STABLE. WE CAN ESTIMATE THAT PRETTY ACCURATELY. THE COMMERCIAL INSURANCE FLUCTUATES AND THEN PRIVATE PAYS. WE ASSUME NO PAY ON THAT PROPOSED FEE. SCHEDULE IS IN LINE WITH OTHER AGENCIES IN THE STATE, AND SHOULD OPTIMIZE THE COMMERCIAL INSURANCE REVENUE, GIVING US A BETTER PROJECTED CASH FOR TRANSPORT TO SUPPORT OUR OPERATIONS. THOSE NUMBERS ARE PROJECTED TO GO TO ABOUT $445 PER TRANSPORT, AND THE TOTAL REIMBURSEMENT ON THAT WOULD BE JUST OVER 5 MILLION. OUR CURRENT CASH FOR TRANSPORT IS ESTIMATED AT $315. WE'RE LOOKING TO RAISE THAT TO $415 PER TRANSPORT, AGAIN THROUGH COMMERCIAL INSURANCE REVENUE.

AND OUR CURRENT REVENUE ON EMS FEES IS 4.3 MILLION, PROJECTED WOULD GO TO 5.08 MILLION.

QUESTIONS INVOLVING RESIDENT WRITE OFFS. HOW DOES RESIDENT WRITE OFF POLICY IMPACT OUR CHARITY CARE? WE COVERED THAT CHARITY CARE WOULD HAVE TO GO AWAY IF WE DO. RESIDENT WRITE OFF POLICY WOULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR AMBULANCE SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT PROGRAM.

YES IT WOULD. WE WOULD GO TO RESIDENT WRITE OFF AND FOREGO THE NEARLY $300,000 THAT WE GET FROM THE STATE AT THE END OF THE YEAR. CURRENTLY, IS IT LEGAL TO WRITE OFF RESIDENT BALANCES AND BILL NONRESIDENTS? YES IT IS. WE CHECKED WITH OUR LEGAL FOLKS AND THEY DID A LITTLE RESEARCH ON IT, AND THEY SAID YOU CAN CHARGE DIFFERENT FEES FOR RESIDENT VERSUS NONRESIDENT. SO RESIDENT WRITE OFF WOULD BASICALLY BE A ZERO FEE. AND FOR NON INSURED AND NONRESIDENTS THE RATE WOULD BE IDENTICAL. BUT THE PERCEPTION WOULD BE WE CAN WRITE OFF THE RESIDENT UNINSURED FEES. DOES IT NEGATIVELY IMPACT MEDICARE OR MEDICAID. NO. THOSE FEES ARE SET AND STANDARD. WE SEND THEM A BILL. THEY SEND US A CHECK. AND DO PRIVATE INSURERS INSURANCE PROVIDERS ALLOW THIS PRACTICE? CURRENTLY THE PRACTICE IS YES, THEY CAN CERTAINLY CHANGE THAT AT ANY POINT IN TIME, BUT IT'S NOT FORESEEN THAT THEY WILL. AGAIN, THEY WE COULD BE BILLING UP TO $2,600 ON THAT ALS TWO CALL, AND WE'RE ONLY PROPOSING 1750. SO THEY'RE PROBABLY GOING TO BE PRETTY HAPPY WITH THAT FEE TAKING THEIR DEDUCTIBLES AND CO-PAYS AND SENDING THE CHECK. WITH THAT, I'LL ENTERTAIN ALL THE QUESTIONS. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS, THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR.XCELLENT PRESENTATION. CHIEF, THESE ALL OF THESE WITH THE CHANGES AND PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULES. HOW HOW DO YOU ANTICIPATE GETTING THIS INFORMATION, THE NEW FEES, IF THE COUNCIL APPROVES IT OUT TO

[02:15:08]

THE COMMUNITY. ARE YOU GOING TO PUT IT ON YOUR WEBSITE. AND ALSO PROBABLY GOES TO CITY MANAGER.

BUT BUT EXPLAIN BRIEFLY HOW HOW THIS INFORMATION IS GOING TO GET GET OUT TO HOPEFULLY THE USERS.

BECAUSE AS A AS A ONE TIME USER, I EXPERIENCED BUT IT WAS POSITIVE ONE. BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE THAT EXPERIENCE. SO PAINT A PICTURE FOR ME ON HOW YOU PLAN ON GETTING IF THE NEW FEE SCHEDULE IS ADOPTED, HOW HOW ARE YOU ENVISION GETTING THE WORD OUT? SO YOU DON'T HAVE THE NEGATIVE DOWNFALL THAT IS COMMON IN SOME OTHER CITIES? THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION, SIR, AND I WILL I WILL TELL YOU MY FEAR. AND THIS IS WHETHER IT'S A $500 BILL OR A 1750 INVOICE THAT I WOULD BE SENDING SOMEBODY. I'M HESITANT TO PUSH THAT MESSAGE REAL STRONGLY IN FEAR THAT SOME OF THOSE THAT NEED OUR SERVICES THE MOST WON'T CALL. AND SO I THINK IT WOULD BE BETTER FOR US TO DELIVER THAT BILL, THAT INVOICE THAT SAYS, DO YOU HAVE INSURANCE? AND IF THEY CHECK NO, OR THEY CHECK MEDICARE OR THEY CHECK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD AND LET US DO THE BILLING ON THAT, LET THEIR CO-INSURANCE APPLY. IF THERE IS CO-INSURANCE, IF IT'S A MEDICARE BILL, THEY'LL NEVER GET ANOTHER MESSAGE FROM US. SO I WOULD RATHER REMAIN. IN THE FEE SCHEDULE. OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE TO DO THAT, BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT I WANT TO PUSH THAT MESSAGE OUT IN FEAR THAT SOMEBODY WILL SAY, I CAN'T AFFORD TO CALL 911, BECAUSE THAT'S MY BIGGEST FEAR IN THE WORLD, IS THAT SOMEBODY WILL SUFFER FOR FEAR OF BEING ABLE TO MAKE PAYMENT. AS YOU ALL KNOW, WE ARE VERY SOFT ON COLLECTIONS ANYWAY. WE HAVE WRITE OFFS AT THE END OF THE YEAR, EVERY YEAR FROM THOSE THAT CAN'T PAY US, WE JUST WRITE IT OFF ALREADY OR IF WE CAN APPLY IT TO CHARITY CARE WE DO, BUT THOSE THAT WE CAN'T AND THEY STILL CAN'T AFFORD IT, THEY, THEY MAKE A MODEST INCOME, BUT IT'S ABOVE THAT 400% LINE AND THEY STILL CAN'T PAY AN AMBULANCE BILL. WE'RE GOING TO INVOICE THEM 2 OR 3 TIMES JUST TO MAKE SURE THEY DIDN'T THINK IT WAS JUNK MAIL, BUT THEN IT'S JUST GOING TO GO AWAY. AND I WOULD SEE THE SAME THING HAPPENING HERE TODAY. MR. MR. CITY MANAGER HAVING THOUGHTS ON ON THIS? I'M NOT ADVOCATING. I'M JUST ASKING IS IT'S WE MAYBE THIS MAYBE THIS IS A SOLUTION LOOKING FOR A PROBLEM. BUT DO YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS. YEAH. I MEAN I CONCUR WITH CHIEF THAT OUR FEAR IS THAT PEOPLE ARE NOT GOING TO CALL 911 IF THEY THINK THAT THE CITY IS GOING TO SHAKE THEM DOWN FOR AN AMBULANCE RIDE, AND THAT THAT'S NOT THE CASE. AND SO WE SHOULDN'T SORT OF PUT OURSELVES OUT THERE IN THAT WAY.

THE INFORMATION IS ALWAYS AVAILABLE. I MEAN, IF SOMEBODY DOES WANT TO COME IN AND SCRUTINIZE WHAT, WHAT THE FEES ARE, THE INFORMATION IS THERE, IT'S IN THE FEE SCHEDULE. AND CERTAINLY ANYONE TUNING IN ON THE BUDGET CONVERSATION WILL KNOW ABOUT IT TOO. BUT AND WE'RE NOT TRYING TO HIDE FROM HIDE ANY FEES OR ANYTHING. I THINK IT'S JUST WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES ARE OF, OF, I GUESS, PUTTING TOO MUCH INFORMATION OUT THERE AND GIVING THE RESIDENTS THE PERCEPTION THAT WE'RE GOING TO SHAKE THEM DOWN FOR, FOR MORE THAN MORE THAN WE WANT TO. SO, I MEAN, THE REALITY OF, OF, OF WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH HERE IS THAT WE'RE WE'RE LEAVING MONEY ON THE TABLE FOR PEOPLE THAT HAVE INSURANCE THAT COVERS AN AMBULANCE, AN AMBULANCE CALL. WE'RE LEAVING MONEY ON THE TABLE. AND IT'S NOT MONEY THAT'S GOING TO COME OUT OF RESIDENTS POCKET. IT'S GOING TO COME OUT OF THE INSURANCE THAT THEY'RE ALREADY PAYING. VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT WE DID LAST YEAR WITH WITH SOME OF OUR ACCIDENT RESPONSE FEES AND THAT SORT OF THING. SO IT'S JUST A CONTINUATION OF US TRYING TO NOT LEAVE MONEY ON THE TABLE. I APPRECIATE, I APPRECIATE, I APPRECIATE THAT BECAUSE I HAVE HAVE EXPERIENCED THIS FROM SOME PUBLIC. AND THAT I FOUND OUT WAS NOT TRUE. BUT THEY SAID ANYWAY, SO I WAS I WAS THAT'S WHY I SAID QUESTION HOW HOW WE WERE GOING TO COMMUNICATE. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR RESPONSE. THANKS. THANK YOU, MR. CITY MANAGER. I'D MUCH RATHER PUT OUT TO THE PUBLIC THAT WE DON'T HAVE A CREDIT CARD MACHINE IN THE AMBULANCE, AND THERE'S NO TIPPING EITHER. YES, YES, YES, I'VE HEARD THAT ONE TOO. OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU MAYOR, PLEASE ANSWER THIS ONE QUESTION AS YOU GET YOUR COFFEE. YES. COUNCILMEMBER. THOMAS. YES,

[02:20:05]

CHIEF. FUEL, GO BACK TO SLIDE THREE, PLEASE, SIR. YOU HIT THE WRONG BUTTON. AND YOU CONTINUE TO HIT THE WRONG BUTTON. YES, SIR. SO IF YOU WILL HELP A NEW COUNCILMAN WITH MY GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS, I SEE ALS, TWO, ALS, AND BLS, AND I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THOSE STAND FOR. COULD HELP ME OUT. FOR THE RECORD, THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION AND I SHOULD BE MORE COGNIZANT OF THAT WHEN I PREPARE THESE. BLS IS BASIC LIFE SUPPORT. ALS IS ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT. SO IF WE SHOW UP AND DO BASIC WOUND CARE, WE DON'T START AN IV. WE WE'RE NOT DOING EKGS ON YOU AND ALL THAT STUFF. THAT WOULD BE A BASIC LIFE SUPPORT. WHEN WE START IV, IT STEPS INTO ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT, A 12 LEAD EKG, ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT, AIRWAY INTERVENTIONS ARE ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT. AND THERE'S DRUG ADMINISTRATION. IF WE GIVE THREE DRUGS AND AN IV, THAT'S FOUR ADVANCED SKILLS, WHICH WE'RE NOW INTO ALS TWO TYPE SITUATION OKAY. VERY GOOD. I JUST I KNEW THOSE REPRESENTED DIFFERENT LEVELS, BUT I WASN'T QUITE SURE WHAT THAT ENTAILED. SO AND I AGREE THAT WE'RE I MEAN WE'RE CHARGING LESS THAN MEDICARE WOULD PAY. THAT MAKES NO SENSE. WE SHOULD AT LEAST GET THAT MUCH. IT'S A LITTLE ALARMING. YES, SIR. I SO YEAH, I'M REALLY HAPPY TO COME AND SEE WHAT WE'RE DOING. SOMETHING THAT'S MORE, YOU KNOW, EQUIVALENT TO GET US IN THE STATEWIDE AVERAGES. WE'RE WE'RE LEAVING A LOT OF MONEY ON THE TABLE OTHERWISE. SO ANYWAY, I DO THANK YOU FOR THIS PRESENTATION. I' I'M FULLY SUPPORT YOUR PROGRAM HERE. THANK YOU SIR.

THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. MAYOR PRO TEM LUCK. SO LAST YEAR YOU HIRED A WELL CITY, HIRED A NEW COMPANY TO DO COLLECTIONS FOR FEES. HAVE YOU SEEN AN INCREASE IN THE ABILITY TO COLLECT FEES FROM PEOPLE THROUGH THAT IMPLEMENTATION? I WOULD HAVE TO GET THAT INFORMATION FOR YOU. I DON'T HAVE IT AVAILABLE FOR ME TODAY. WHEN I PREPARE A LIST OF FIVE QUESTIONS THAT I HOPE YOU DON'T ASK, THAT W NOT ONE OF THE FIVE, SO THANK YOU FOR ASKING THAT. NUMBER SIX.

WE'LL GET THAT INFORMATION FOR YOU. THANK YOU. AND SO OTHER OTHER CITIES HAVE LIKE PRIVATIZED EMS SERVICES IN A CASE WHERE THERE IS A PRIVATIZED EMS SERVICE, THEY ARE IN CONTROL OF THE FEES. WE WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO THOSE OTHER CITIES DON'T TELL THEM WHAT TO CHARGE. NOT REAL SURE ON THAT. I'M SURE THAT COULD BE A CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT OR A NEGOTIATING TOOL IN IT, BUT TYPICALLY THEY CHARGE THEIR OWN FEES AND SET THEIR OWN FEE SCHEDULE. OKAY, I WAS JUST CURIOUS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SURE. SOUNDS LIKE GREAT INFORMATION THAT WE'RE GOING TO RESEARCH. I THINK WE MIGHT BE TALKING ABOUT THAT AGAIN VERY SOON. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MA'AM, THANK YOU MA'AM. COUNCIL MEMBER BEARD OKAY, FIRST OF ALL, WE NEED TO CHARGE MORE FOR AMBULANCE SERVICES. I'VE HAD TWO AMBULANCE CALLS IN THE LAST FEW YEARS. BOTH WERE ASL TWOS. ONE WAS GARLAND, ONE WAS DALLAS. I DID NOT CALL IN ADVANCE TO ASK HOW MUCH THE FEES WERE GOING TO BE, BUT WHEN I GOT THE BILLS, DALLAS WAS ALMOST THREE TIMES AS MUCH AS GARLAND'S NOW FILLED OUT THE INFORMATION. YES, I HAVE INSURANCE. HERE'S MY INSURANCE INFORMATION. I EXPECTED TO RECEIVE A BILL FOR THE DIFFERENCE. STILL GOT A EOB FROM MY INSURANCE COMPANY THAT SAYS YOU DON'T OWE ANYTHING. SO I THINK THAT'S A GREAT POLICY AND WE SHOULD NOT BE LEAVING MONEY ON THE TABLE. IF MEDICARE AND INSURANCE WILL ALREADY PAY THESE FEES, OUR SERVICES FAR EXCEED THE FEES WE'RE CHARGING. SO I'M IN FULL AGREEMENT THAT WE NEED TO BE CHARGING MORE. SO THANK YOU SO MUCH AND KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK. THANKS I APPRECIATE THAT. THANK YOU. MA'AM. COUNCIL MEMBER BASS THANK YOU. THANK YOU. CHIEF. WHEN IS THE LAST TIME WE REVIEWED THESE FEES FOR AN INCREASE? TWO YEARS AGO. REALLY? OKAY. WOW. JUST I DON'T RECALL THAT, BUT IT JUST SEEMS LIKE.

MAN, IT SEEMS LIKE WE'RE WAY BEHIND, YOU KNOW? JUST A SECOND. WAS IT TWO YEARS AGO? MATT AND ALLISON? YEAH. TWO YEARS AGO. WE WERE TALKING ABOUT ELASTICITY OF THE MARKET. AND WHAT CAN THE CITY WITHSTAND? WE KEPT THAT IN MIND WITH THESE FEES BECAUSE AS A RESIDENT, THESE FEES ARE PROBABLY MORE THAN I COULD COULD STAND FOR. BUT THE RESIDENT RIGHT OFF POLICY AND THE NO BALANCE BILLING THAT IS IMPLEMENTED IN 23 BY THE LEGISLATURE HAVE MADE THIS MORE

[02:25:03]

PALATABLE, IF YOU WILL. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. AND YOU'VE THOUGHT ABOUT IT THE RIGHT WAY, TOO. AND I REALLY, REALLY APPRECIATE THAT. WE UNDERSTAND WE TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION OUR RESIDENTS AND WHAT THEY CAN AFFORD, AS OPPOSED TO JUST PUTTING BILLS ON THEM. BUT YOU'RE RIGHT WITH IT, YOU KNOW, INSURANCE AND MEDICAID, THEN WE SHOULD BE WE SHOULD BE WE SHOULD NOT BE LEAVING MONEY ON THE TABLE. SO I APPRECIATE IT. APPRECIATE THAT YOU'VE THOUGHT OF THE IMPACT ON THE RESIDENTS AND HOW WE'RE GOING TO WORK AROUND THAT, TOO. SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. AND YEAH, IF WE LOOK AT THIS AT LEAST EVERY TWO YEARS, THEN I'D LIKE TO, YOU KNOW, I'D LIKE FOR US TO CONTINUE TO DO THAT SO THAT WE DON'T LOOK BACK IN FIVE, SEVEN YEARS FROM NOW AND LIKE, WAIT, WE'RE LEAVING. WE'VE BEEN LEAVING MONEY ON THE TABLE AGAIN. OKAY. AWESOME. THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION. THANK YOU SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON FIRE FEES? FEES I SEE NONE. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU ALL. COUNCIL, I'D LIKE TO DO ONE MORE DEPARTMENT BEFORE WE BREAK FOR LUNCH. SO NEXT UP IS OUR LANDFILL DEPARTMENT. THANK YOU. MARK, I WAS TRYING TO THINK OF A QUESTION THAT YOU WOULDN'T HAVE. QUITE THE ENTRY THERE, CHRIS. I WASN'T THINKING FAST ENOUGH.

STEAMER COMING IN HERE. YEAH, A LOT OF QUESTIONS. TEXT, SOMETHING. IT'S JUST A MESS WITH HIM. OH. OH, YOU WANT TO DO ALL THE TALKING? I'M GOING TO DO AWESOME. IT IS HOT. WHY IS THIS? IMPLEMENTATION SCREWED UP? YEAH, I'LL DO IT RIGHT. YES, SIR. OKAY. WELCOME, EVERYONE. THANK YOU EVERYONE. GOOD MORNING. WE'LL TALK ABOUT THE LANDFILL FEE CHANGES. SO TO BEGIN WITH JUST A REVIEW OF REVIEW OF OUR REVENUES OVER THE LAST TEN YEARS BASICALLY AND A LITTLE PERSPECTIVE IN IT, WHAT WE'VE SEEN SINCE 2021 IS ABOUT A 21% INCREASE IN OUR TONNAGE THROUGHOUT THAT PERIOD, AND ABOUT A 42% INCREASE IN OUR REVENUE, WHICH IS MOST OF IT CAME IN 2023, OBVIOUSLY, BUT JUST JUST SHOWING YOU THIS HISTORY AND THE LINE IS THE GAS PLANT REVENUE, WHICH IS STILL REALLY SUCCESSFUL. IT'S IN EXCESS OF $1 MILLION A YEAR, ALTHOUGH IT HAS SORT OF FLATTENED OFF THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS. AND WHAT I'M HEARING ABOUT THAT REVENUE STREAM IS THAT IT'S EXPECTED TO STAY STABLE. THAT MARKET IS VERY VOLATILE, AND THE RECENTLY PASSED THE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL HAD SOME SOME ENERGY INCENTIVES IN IT. AND MOST OF THAT WAS DISINCENTIVES FOR SOLAR AND WIND. AND IT REALLY DIDN'T AFFECT THE LANDFILL GAS SIDE AT ALL. SO THE PEOPLE IN THAT MARKET ARE EXPECTING IT TO STAY STABLE AND MAYBE INCREASE OVER A LONGER PERIOD, BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT OF NEW SPECULATION ABOUT THAT BEING BOLSTERED BECAUSE IT DIDN'T GETISINCENTIVIZED. SO THAT'S GOOD NEWS FOR THE GAS REVENUE. AND THIS IS JUST A SHORT REVIEW OF OUR TIPPING FEE INCREASES OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS. SO IN 2021, WE RAISED OUR RATES BY 8%. AND THEN IN 20 ON THE CONTRACT RATE ONLY, WE HAVE SEVERAL RATES. IF YOU RECALL, THE CONTRACT RATE IS WHAT WE CHARGE OUR LARGE COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE GUARANTEED VOLUMES, BIG VOLUMES. THE NEXT RATE WE HAVE IS CALLED THE GATE RATE. THAT'S WHAT WE CHARGE, WHAT I CALL WALK UP CUSTOMERS. BUT THEY'RE DRIVING IN AND THEN WE HAVE ANOTHER RATE THAT'S FOR C AND D WHICH IS $60. SO IN 2021 WE INCREASED THE CONTRACT RATE 8%. IN 2022 WE INCREASED THE MINIMUM FEE. THE MINIMUM FEE IS WHAT WE CHARGE. SOMEONE WHO HAS LESS THAN ONE TON. IT'S JUST A FLAT RATE. IF YOU HAVE LESS THAN ONE TON IT WAS $10. NOW IT'S $25. AND THEN IN 2023 WE INCREASED THE GATE RATE BY 4%. WE ALSO INCREASED THE CONTRACT RATE BY 7%. AND THAT'S THE YEAR THAT WE CREATED THE C AND D RATE. AND I'M SURE YOU ALL RECALL THE REASON WE DID THAT. IT'S AN EFFECTIVE RATE SO THAT WE'RE GETTING THE SAME AMOUNT OF DOLLARS FOR THE AIRSPACE BECAUSE OUR COMMODITY IS AIRSPACE, BUT WE SELL IT BY THE TON. SO

[02:30:01]

THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF A LANDFILL BUSINESS. I DON'T WANT TO CALL IT A TRICK, BUT IT'S A CALCULATION THAT YOU WANT TO MAKE SO THAT YOU ARE SURE YOU'RE GETTING THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF MONEY FOR YOUR AIRSPACE. CHRIS, PLEASE EXPLAIN THE C AND D. OH, I'M SORRY, C AND D STANDS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION AS OPPOSED TO HOUSEHOLD TRASH, WHICH WE ALSO CALL MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE. THANK YOU. AND THEN MOVING RIGHT ALONG. SO THESE ARE OUR PROPOSALS FOR THE COMING YEAR. AND WE'RE LOOKING AT EACH OF THE RATES THIS YEAR. IT'S ESSENTIALLY IT'S A 5% INCREASE.

WE'VE ROUNDED THE NUMBERS SO THAT ALL OF OUR RATES ARE EVEN DOLLAR AMOUNTS. SO WE'RE PROPOSING TO TAKE THE GATE RATE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY45 A TON, AND RAISING IT BY $2 TO 47.

WE'RE PROPOSING TO TAKE THE C AND D RATE, WHICH IS $60 A TON, AND RAISING IT TO $63. THE MANUAL UNLOAD RATE IS WHAT WE CHARGE. MOST OF THEM ARE ALL C AND D TRUCKS, BUT THE FOLKS WHO DON'T HAVE AUTOMATIC TIPPING TRUCK OR TRAILER, THEY TAKE UP A LITTLE MORE TIME, THEY TAKE UP A LITTLE MORE SPACE. SO WE HAVE A PREMIUM ON THAT. SO THAT'S WHAT THAT RATE IS. IT'S $65 A TON, AND WE'RE PROPOSING TO MOVE IT TO 68. THE MINIMUM FEE WE'RE PROPOSING TO TAKE TO $50 FOR A MINIMUM FEE IF YOU'RE UNDER ONE TON. AND WE WANT TO POINT OUT THAT GARLAND RESIDENTS ARE NEVER CHARGED ANY FEE WHEN THEY COME TO THE LANDFILL, AS ARE RESIDENTS AND ROWLETT RESIDENTS.

I'D ALSO JUST TO PUT A LITTLE PERSPECTIVE ON THAT FEE IN THE REGION, THERE ARE A COUPLE OF LANDFILLS WHO HAVE A TWO TON MINIMUM, AND SO THOSE RATES LOOK LIKE 101, $103 AND ONES 104 14.

THERE ARE SOME MINIMUM FEES THAT ARE LOWER THAN OURS. THERE'S A THE LOWEST MINIMUM FEE IS $34.

THAT'S DALLAS MCCOMBS BLUFF LANDFILL. SO OUR RATES RIGHT KIND OF IN THE AVERAGE SWEET SPOT FOR THAT. THE AVERAGE MINIMUM RATE CHARGED ACROSS OUR REGION IS $54. AND THEN OUR NEXT SLIDE IS A COMPARISON ACROSS LANDFILLS IN OUR REGION. SO YOU CAN SEE THE HIGHEST RATE IS AT $60. THAT'S LEWISVILLE LANDFILL WHICH IS ACTUALLY OWNED BY A PRIVATE COMPANY. IT'S PUBLIC LANDFILL. AND THE LOWEST RATE IS FERRIS, WHICH IS A LITTLE BIT OUT OF THE RANGE OF WHERE A TRUCK MIGHT GO, WHO COMPETES WITH US. BUT IT'S IN OUR REGION THAT'S ALSO A PRIVATELY OWNED LANDFILL BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. SO THE REST OF THESE ARE MUNICIPALLY OWNED LANDFILLS, WITH FORT WORTH BEING ON THE HIGH END, ARLINGTON BEING AT THE LOW END. SO OUR PROPOSAL TO $47 IS PUTTING US RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THAT AVERAGE RATE. AND REALLY THAT'S IT WOULD BE THE FASTEST MUCH. MAYOR PRO TEM LUCHT. SO I MENTIONED THIS EVERY SINGLE YEAR. WHAT ARE OUR OUR CONTRACT RATE. THAT IS OUR RATE FOR COMMERCIAL WASTE COMPANIES LIKE WASTE MANAGEMENT. YOU'RE NOT GOING UP ON THAT RATE THIS YEAR. WE. WE ARE NOT GOING UP ON THAT RATE THIS YEAR. WE ALSO DON'T HAVE ANY OF THOSE CONTRACTS COMING UP FOR RENEWAL THIS YEAR. SO ALL OF THOSE CONTRACTS WILL RENEW. WE'LL HAVE ANOTHER CHANCE TO LOOK AT THAT RATE BEFORE THE CONTRACTS RENEW.

OKAY. DO YOU KNOW WHEN THEY RENEW? I'M SURE THEY'RE ALL LIKE DIFFERENT TIMES. BUT WHEN WILL WE SEE THOSE AGAIN? THERE ARE FOUR CONTRACTS. TWO OF THEM ARE GOING TO RENEW AT THE END OF NEXT YEAR. OKAY. I MEAN, I'VE, I'VE BEEN A WITH MY PREVIOUS JOB, WE HAD A CONTRACT WITH REPUBLIC. IT WENT UP FROM $1,400 A MONTH TO $3,200 A MONTH UNDER THEIR CONTRACT. WE COULD DO NOTHING ABOUT IT. THE SOME OF THOSE COMPANIES ARE REALLY PRICE GOUGING PEOPLE, AND I'M NOT SAYING PRICE GOUGE THEM, BUT I AM SAYING THAT LIKE OUR 2023 INCREASE WAS 7%. THEY'RE CHARGING THEIR CUSTOMERS WAY MORE THAN THAT. SO I THINK IT'S ONLY FAIR. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT CONVERSATION. WE'LL HAVE A CHANCE TO LOOK AT THAT. WE DID HAVE SOME CONVERSATION, BUT SINCE THERE WEREN'T CONTRACTS, I ALSO THINK THAT THE I'M GOING TO SAY THE DISTANCE BETWEEN OUR GATE RATE AND OUR CONTRACT RATE, WE MIGHT WANT TO TALK ABOUT CLOSING THAT GAP.

OKAY, GREAT. I'M OPEN TO IT. OKAY. NOW'S THE TIME. NO, BUT THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YOU'RE WELCOME. THANK YOU, MAYOR. THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBER BASS. THANK YOU. CHRIS, CAN YOU GO TO SLIDE TWO, PLEASE? SORRY. THIS ONE. ONE MORE BACK. ONE MORE. THERE YOU GO. RIGHT THERE OKAY. COOL.

[02:35:06]

SO QUESTION ABOUT THE GAS TO ENERGY. OF COURSE I LOVE THAT PROGRAM. THOUGHT IT WAS A GREAT IDEA. WHAT. BUT I'M TRYING TO REMEMBER WHAT WAS THE INITIAL PROJECTIONS FOR REVENUE THAT WE WERE GOING TO COME IN. HOW DOES THAT COMPARE TO THE ACTUAL. IT'S A GREAT QUESTION. INITIALLY, WE THOUGHT THAT WE WOULD BE EARNING BETWEEN 600 AND $700,000 PER YEAR OFF THAT PROGRAM. OKAY, SO IT'S BEEN REALLY GOOD. OKAY, COOL. AND I'M GLAD YOU MENTIONED BECAUSE I WAS THINKING ABOUT THE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL. I THOUGHT THAT WAS GOING TO NEGATIVELY IMPACT THIS. SO GLAD TO HEAR THAT IT THAT IT DIDN'T. I WAS REALLY WORRIED ABOUT THAT. SO ANY QUESTIONS I HAD APPRECIATE THE BRIEF PRESENTATION AND KEEP DOING WHAT YOU DO. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR.

COUNCILMEMBER. EXCUSE ME, DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM. MR. MAYOR. THANK YOU CHRIS. THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION, ESPECIALLY THE LANDFILL GAS. THAT WAS ONE OF THE QUESTIONS I HAD WAS WHETHER THE BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL WAS GOING TO HAVE AN EFFECT ON IT, AND THANKFULLY IT DOESN'T. SO THAT'S GOOD. AND WE APPROVED A GRINDING MACHINE FOR THE LANDFILL I THINK IT WAS LAST YEAR. HAS THAT YIELDED THE BENEFIT THAT YOU EXPECTED? AND SINCE WE'RE SELLING AIR SPACE AND ULTIMATELY HOW MUCH WE CAN COMPACT THINGS. THAT'S ANOTHER GREAT QUESTION. THE ANSWER IS YES. I THINK IT IS YIELDING A BENEFIT. I DON'T HAVE NUMBERS PREPARED RIGHT NOW, AND WE'VE HAD A BIT OF TIME LEARNING HOW TO USE THE MACHINE. SO AT THIS TIME WE REALLY ARE HITTING OUR STRIDE USING THAT MACHINE. IT'S DEFINITELY PROVIDING A BENEFIT OF REDUCING THE VOLUME, AND I WOULD LOVE TO COME BACK AND GIVE YOU MORE DETAILS ABOUT THAT PROGRAM. SURE. I'LL JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR YOUR HARD WORK. THE LANDFILL, IT'S AN UNUSUAL REVENUE SOURCE FOR A CITY, BUT IT WORKS VERY WELL FOR US. AND SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR STEWARDSHIP OF IT. YOU'RE WELCOME. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. ONE QUESTION I HAD REGARDING THIS IS THAT WITH THE WE'VE CONSTANTLY BEEN INCREASING FEES OVER THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS. HAVE YOU SEEN ANY. OF THE COMPANIES COMING TO DROP OFF AT OUR LANDFILL? HAVE THEY DECIDED TO GO OTHER PLACES? ARE WE DRIVING CUSTOMERS AWAY BY OUR CONSTANT INCREASE OF FEES? THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. AND THE ANSWER IS PROBABLY OUR TONNAGE IS DROPPED AFTER WE INSTITUTED THE NEW CAP RATE. THE PREVIOUS YEAR, WE HAD AROUND 762,000 TONS TOTAL. AND THEN THE NEXT YEAR, WHICH WAS 2024, OUR TONNAGE DROPPED 2% TO 749,000. I THINK THIS YEAR WE'RE GOING TO BE ABOVE THAT. WE'RE GOING TO I'M PROJECTING PROBABLY AROUND 760,000. SO WE'LL BE BACK UP 1%. MOST OF THAT WAS WE GOT A LOT OF ROOFERS WHO CAME TO OUR LANDFILL BEFORE, AND THEY'VE GONE AWAY. IT'S NOT A BAD THING, OPERATIONALLY SPEAKING. THAT'S VERY HARD MATERIAL TO MANAGE AND BURY TAKES UP CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF SPACE. THE OTHER, THE OTHER C AND D NUMBERS DID DROP OFF, BUT OUR REVENUE INCREASED AS A RESULT OF CHANGING OUR C AND D RATE. SO IT'S A GOOD THING TO HAVE LESS TONS BECAUSE WE'RE KEEPING THE LANDFILL LONGER, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU CAN KEEP THE SAME OR EVEN A LITTLE BIT MORE REVENUE. SO IT'S A LITTLE BIT OF A MIXED ANSWER. ON THE SURFACE IT SOUNDS BAD. YEAH, I THINK WE LOST SOME TONS. BUT A LITTLE BIT DEEPER DIVE. I THINK WE'RE BENEFITING IN THE LONG RUN BECAUSE THE REVENUE IS THE SAME AND WE'RE USING LESS AIRSPACE. AND POSSIBLY THAT COULD DO WITH THE MARKET, WITH MORE OR LESS CONSTRUCTION HAPPENING ACROSS THE METROPLEX. IF MY INDUSTRY, I'VE SEEN CONSTRUCTION SLOW DOWN A BIT, THEN PRODUCES LESS DEBRIS, POSSIBLY. SO MAYBE AN ANSWER, BUT THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COUNCIL. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? ALL RIGHT I SEE NONE THEN. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. AND COUNCIL, WE'LL TAKE A BRIEF RECESS AND I ASK YOU TO BE BACK AT NOON. WE WILL RECESS FOR LUNCH. THANK YOU.

GOOD AFTERNOON AND WELCOME BACK TO OUR AUGUST 16TH, 2025 SPECIAL BUDGET WORK SESSION. WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM DISCUSSION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCE ZONE NUMBER TWO. MR. WATSON, PLEASE.

THANKS, MAYOR. THIS THIS IS A PROPOSAL THAT WILL BENEFIT BOTH THE GENERAL FUND AND FUTURE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES ALONG THE I-30 CORRIDOR THAT WE WANTED TO PUT IN FRONT OF YOU ALL AS A PART OF THE 20 2526 BUDGET. SO FIRST, I JUST WILL GIVE YOU A QUICK HISTORY ON TIF NUMBER TWO. SO TIP NUMBER TWO IS ESTABLISHED JANUARY 1ST, 2005 WITH A BASE VALUE OF $75 MILLION. AND WHAT I MEAN BY THAT, IF YOU LOOK AT THIS TRIANGLE, WHAT WHAT A TIF DOES

[02:40:02]

IS WHEN YOU CREATE A TIF AROUND A GEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARY, THE VERY FIRST YEAR IT'S CALLED THE BASE VALUE, AND THAT IS THE VALUE OF THE TAXES THAT START THAT, THAT BEGINNING OF THAT YEAR. BUT OVER TIME, THIS TIF WAS IS A 20 YEAR TIFF. SO OVER TIME, AS TAX BASE GROWS, INSTEAD OF THAT GOING TO THE GENERAL FUND AND DEBT SERVICE FUND, THAT INCREMENTAL GROWTH GOES INTO A TIF FUND TO BE USED SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS GEOGRAPHIC AREA. SO AGAIN, THE BASE VALUE IN 2004 WAS 75 MILLION. IT HAS GROWN TO OVER 414 MILLION HERE. NOW THIS TIF IS SET TO EXPIRE DECEMBER 31ST, 2025. AND IT WAS PRIMARILY ESTABLISHED TO FACILITATE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE I-30 CORRIDOR AND SPECIFICALLY AT THE BASS PRO SHOP. SO IN 2005, WHEN THE TIF WAS FIRST SET UP, IT WAS IN THE PROJECT PLAN. THE ONLY PROJECT WITHIN THE PROJECT PLAN IS TO PAY FOR THE DEBT SERVICE ASSOCIATED WITH BASS PRO. OVER TIME, IT HAS BEEN PAYING A PORTION OF THAT DEBT SERVICE, BUT NOT ALL OF IT, AND I'LL GET INTO THAT IN A LITTLE BIT LONGER. BUT WE ARE HAPPY TO SAY THAT THE LAST DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT FOR BASS PRO OCCURRED THIS YEAR, SO THERE IS NOW NO MORE EXPENDITURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE TIF. SO THE QUESTION COMES, DO WE LET THE TIF EXPIRE, ALLOWING ALL THAT INCREMENTAL GROWTH TO FLOW BACK TO THE DEBT SERVICE TAX RATE INTO THE TAX RATE TO HELP THE GENERAL FUND, OR DO WE EXTEND IT TO DO OTHER PROJECTS ALONG THE HARBOR POINT AREA OR ANYWHERE ELSE ON I-30 SO QUICKLY? HERE'S A LOOK AT THE GEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARIES OF THE CURRENT TIF TWO. YOU CAN SEE THAT IT FOLLOWS I-30. YOU KNOW, SOUTH ALL THE WAY UP TO THE BASS PRO SHOP, BUT DOES NOT ENCOMPASS A WHOLE LOT OF THE HARBOR POINT AREA. RLLY JUST LOOKING TO PICK UP VACANT PROPERTIES. AND THIS IS A SIMILAR STORY OF WHAT I TOLD EARLIER ON ABOUT THE GREAT RECESSION. SO WHEN WE FIRST ESTABLISHED THIS TIF, AGAIN, WE ISSUED DEBT FOR BASS PRO, THE FACILITIES THERE, AND WE'RE WE'RE WE'RE TO BEGIN TO START ISSUING PAYMENT. HOWEVER, YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS TIF DID NOT PERFORM WELL AT ALL, ESPECIALLY ALL THE WAY UP THROUGH 2018. AND IN FACT, IN 2009, WE HAD ABOUT $425,000 OF REVENUE THAT WAS BUILT UP. AND BY 2017, IT TOOK THAT LONG JUST TO GET BACK TO THAT EXACT SAME REVENUE LEVEL, WHICH IF YOU'RE A TIF, WHICH STANDS FOR TAX INCREMENT FOR EIGHT YEARS, THIS WAS A DETRIMENT, NOT AN INEMENT. AND ALL ALONG THAT TIME WE'RE HAVING TO PAY THE DEBT SERVICE ON BASS PRO. BUT YOU CAN SEE IN 2022 THIS TIF REALLY STARTED TO EXPLODE WITH SIGNIFICANT NEW CONSTRUCTION BEING PERFORMED ALONG I-30 IN THE WAY OF NEW HOMES, IN THE WAY OF MULTIFAMILY. AND MATT, REAL QUICK, HOW MUCH WAS THE ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE ON THE ON THE BASS PRO OR WAS ISSUED FOR TIF TWO? IT WAS IT WAS I MEAN, IN THE FIRST PART OF THE YEAR THAT WE SET IT UP SO THAT THERE WERE BALLOON PAYMENTS AT THE END THIS. SO THE $2 MILLION DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT, THAT'S ROUGHLY 40% OF THE TOTAL DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT THAT WE HAD TO PAY THIS YEAR. AND HERE'S A LOOK ON THE MAP OF SOME OF THOSE LARGE DEVELOPMENTS THAT HAVE REALLY HELPED GROW THE TIF REVENUE OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS WITH THE LOFTS, I-30 DOWN SOUTH ALL THE WAY UP TO THE LAKE VIEW POINT UP NORTH WITH SOME SUBDIVISIONS AND ADDITIONAL APARTMENTS, YOU KNOW, KIND OF SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE WAY. BUT ALL OF THIS IS WHAT REALLY GENERATED, YOU KNOW, ROUGHLY 173.7 MILLION OF NEW CONSTRUCTION, WHICH HAS CAUSED THE REVENUE OF THE TIF TO INCREASE ALL THE WAY TO ABOUT $2.3 MILLION, IS OUR PROJECTION FOR 2025. SO AFTER SPENDING A LOT OF TIME LOOKING AT THIS AND THINKING ABOUT IT, THE PROPOSAL THAT WE'VE PLACED INSIDE OF THE FY 2526 BUDGET IS TO EXPAND THE OR EXPAND THE TERM OF THE TIF ANOTHER 20 YEARS. AND IT'S REALLY FOR TWO REASONS. ONE, ONE IS WE DO KNOW THAT WE NEED TO PROTECT THE GENERAL FUND. AND ORIGINALLY I WAS WANTING THE TIF. I WAS ACTUALLY GOOD AT WAIT FOR THE TIF TO EXPIRE SO THAT I COULD GET THAT MONEY BACK TO THE GENERAL FUND, WHICH IS ROUGHLY ABOUT HALF OF IT. BUT ALL ALL Y'ALL KNOW, WE'VE TALKED ABOUT SB TWO A LOT. IF WE ALLOW THAT TO OCCUR, ALL THAT MONEY WILL GO BACK TO THE GENERAL FUND AND THEN POTENTIALLY ERODE AWAY OVER TIME BECAUSE OF THE EFFECTS OF SB TWO AND THE 3.5% CAP. SO THIS

[02:45:02]

PROPOSAL THAT WE'RE THROWING IN FRONT OF YOU IS YOU KEEP THE TIF, YOU EXTEND THE TERM WHICH KEEPS THAT REVENUE STREAM GROWING, AND IT'S NOT CAPPED BECAUSE IT'S NOT A PART OF THE CALCULATION. BUT WE ENTER INTO A PROJECT PLAN THAT PROVIDES A 50% RETURN TO THE GENERAL FUND FOR PUBLIC SAFETY NEEDS ALONG I-30. AND IN FY 2526, THAT'S WHERE WE'RE WE'RE PROPOSING 50% OF THE TIF REVENUE. THAT'S ABOUT ONE $1 MILLION AND 59,000. THAT WOULD GO BACK TO THE GENERAL FUND TO HELP SUPPORT THE PUBLIC SAFETY EFFORTS THAT GO ALONG I-30. MANY OF Y'ALL PROBABLY KNOW THAT 1 MILLION IS NOT COVERING EVEN JUST A FRACTION OF THE AMOUNT OF FIRE AND POLICE SERVICE THAT IS REQUIRED ALONG THE I-30, AND THEN THE REMAINING 50% WILL STAY IN THE TIF FUND TO BE USED FOR FUTURE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES ALONG I-30 IN THE HARBOR POINT. WITH THAT, THE EXPANDED TIF, AT THE BARE MINIMUM, IS PROJECTED TO GENERATE ABOUT 35 ADDITIONAL MILLION DOLLARS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. SO IT'S GOING TO DO THAT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUT ALSO PROVIDE THE SUPPORT THE GENERAL FUND DESPERATELY NEEDS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY EFFORTS ALONG I-30. SO RIGHT NOW, OUR PROPOSED NEXT STEPS IS, AS YOU ALL KNOW, THE TIF BOARD WILL HAVE TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL REGARDING THE EXPANSION OF THE TIF OR CHANGES IN BOUNDARIES.

THEY ARE SCHEDULED TO HAVE A MEETING AUGUST 20TH NEXT WEEK, WHERE WE WILL PROPOSE THE SAME THING YOU'RE SEEING HERE. WE'VE ALSO HIRED A CONSULTANT TO HELP US IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CHANGES IN THE TIF BOUNDARY. SO THIS WILL COME LATER. THIS WON'T BE DISCUSSED AT THE AUGUST 20TH MEETING, BUT WE DO WANT TO LOOK AT THE OTHER BOUNDARY LINES OF THE TIFF TO SEE IF WE NEED TO EXPAND IT, CONTRACT IT, AND MAKE SURE THAT WE'VE GOT THE MOST EFFICIENT PIECES OF PROPERTY WITHIN THESE PROPERTY LINES, SO THAT IN THE FUTURE, WE DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT MISSING OUT ON OPPORTUNITIES. RIGHT NOW, WE'RE PROJECTING IN SEPTEMBER WE'LL HAVE THE CONSULTANT'S FULL REPORT AND WE'LL GO BACK TO THE TIF BOARD. AND AT THAT TIME, WE'LL BE ASKING THE TIF BOARD TO TAKE DIRECT ACTION ON THE PROJECT AND FINANCING PLAN, WHICH IS THEIR PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY, AND THEY WILL BE ASKED THEY WILL BE CONSIDERING EXPANDING THE TIF FOR ANOTHER 20 YEARS, AND THEN ANY POSSIBLE BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENTS THAT ARE IDENTIFIED THROUGH THE CONSULTANT. AFTER THAT, WE'LL BE BACK IN FRONT OF THE COUNCIL IN OCTOBER TO NOVEMBER. THE NEXT STEPS WOULD BE IF THE TIF BOARD AGREES WITH THESE CHANGES, THEY THEN WILL HAVE TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL. SO THEY WILL COME BACK TO COUNCIL IN OCTOBER TO TALK ABOUT THESE CHANGES. WE WILL NEED TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND ALL OF THIS NEEDS TO OCCUR BEFORE OBVIOUSLY THAT DECEMBER 31ST TIMEFRAME. BUT WE'RE THIS IS THE SCHEDULE. WE'RE PROPOSING TO HAVE EVERYTHING PRETTY MUCH BUTTONED UP ON THIS IN NOVEMBER, WITH THE TIF EXPANDED AND A NEW PROJECT AND FINANCING PLAN FOR THE TIF. WITH THAT, I'LL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBER BASS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MADAM. I'M GLAD YOU TALKED ABOUT BOUNDARIES TOO, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, LOOKING AT THE LOOKING AT THE CURRENT CURRENT BOUNDARIES AND SEE SOME OPPORTUNITY FOR GEOGRAPHICALLY EXPANDING IT, HAVE WE HAD WHAT KIND OF BOUNDARY CHANGES HAVE WE HAD ON THIS TIF? NONE. IT'S NEVER HAD A BOUNDARY CHANGE. IT HAS NOT HAD. OKAY COOL. ONE QUESTION I HAD. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON TIP NUMBER TWO. I SEE NONE. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. COUNCIL WILL THEN MOVE ON TO OUR NEXT ITEM. IT'S WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY FUNDS.

GOOD AFTERNOON MAYOR COUNCIL. SO FOR THE WATER UTILITY DISCUSSION I JUST HAVE AN INTRO SLIDE THAT'S GOING TO REALLY JUST SORT OF ENCAPSULATE WHAT I'VE SEEN FOR THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE AT GARLAND, AND JUST BRIEFLY TOUCH ON A FEW THINGS THAT ARE CURRENT AND SOME FUTURE CHALLENGES THAT WE HAVE IN THE WATER DEPARTMENT, AND THEN WE'LL GET INTO THE BUDGET REQUEST. SO JUST ON A BIG MACRO PERSPECTIVE, SOME OF THE THINGS WE'RE SEEING IN IN WATER UTILITIES, SIGNIFICANT AGING INFRASTRUCTURE. GARLAND IS ONE OF THE OLDER CITIES HERE. AND THE NORTH TEXAS SERVICE AREA. BUT WE HAVE A LOT OF AGING INFRASTRUCTURE. AND WHAT I'VE

[02:50:04]

SEEN IS THERE'S A LOT OF DEFERRED MAINTENANCE THAT HASN'T BEEN PERFORMED FOR ONE REASON OR THE OTHER. AND SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS SOME OF OUR PLANTS ARE BUILT IN 1952, 1962. WE OVERSEE ABOUT 1800 MILES OF MAIN FOR WATER AND SEWER. SO WITH THOSE PLANTS BEING ABOUT 65 YEARS OLD, ONE OF THE THINGS I FIRST LOOKED AT WAS THE STAFFING LEVELS. AND THEY'RE VERY LEAN STAFFING LEVELS. AND WHAT GARLAND HAD DONE WAS SIGNIFICANTLY INVESTED IN THEIR STAFF TO BE THE JACK OF ALL TRADES, BEI ABLE TO START AT AN ENTRY LEVEL AND GET ALL THEIR LICENSING ALL THE WAY UP. SO VERY TALENTED STAFF AND THEY WERE ABLE TO PERFORM A LOT OF THAT. BUT A LOT OF THOSE FOLKS HAVE GROWN OLDER, AS WE ALL HAVE. BUT NOW THAT WE HAVE AN AGING WORKFORCE, AND WHEN WE LOOKED AT THE NEW FOLKS THAT ARE COMING ON, THEY'RE NOT AS SKILLED AND NOT AS TALENTED YET. AND SO WE'RE STRUGGLING WITH TRYING TO BRING IN THOSE REPLACEMENTS FOR EXISTING STAFF TO HELP US WITH THE MAINTENANCE ISSUES. FOROME REASON, WE'VE SEEN A LOT OF DEFERRED MAINTENANCE AND SOME OF THESE PLANTS VISIBLY. YOU DON'T SEE IT INITIALLY, BUT THEN AS YOU START TO MAKE REPAIRS, YOU'RE REALIZING THAT THEY'VE DEFERRED A LOT OF MAINTENANCE AND PUSH THAT OUT TO THE OUT YEARS. AND REGIONALLY, GARLAND IS STILL GROWING AND OUR CUSTOMER CITIES ARE STILL GROWING AND THEY'RE STILL PUTTING ADDITIONAL FLOWS ON OUR WASTEWATER FACILITIES. WE'RE STILL HAVING AN INCREASED WATER DEMAND FROM FROM NORTH TEXAS. SOME OF THE CITY CONTRACTS, AS YOU GUYS HEARD EARLIER, I THINK IT WAS EARLIER THIS YEAR. WE HAVE 50 AND 20 YEAR CONTRACTS FOR DIFFERENT CUSTOMER CITIES THAT ARE ESSENTIALLY LOCKED IN FOR THOSE PERIODS OF TIME. SO THERE'S LIMITED ABILITY TO BE ABLE TO RECOVER ADDITIONAL REVENUES OR CHANGE THAT FUNDING STRUCTURE WITH REGARD TO THOSE CUSTOMER CITIES. AND THAT PLACES A BIGGER BURDEN ON GARLAND RESIDENTS. AND WITH THAT LIMITED ABILITY TO COVER COSTS, WE ARE SEEING INFLOW AND INFILTRATION SPIKE NOT ONLY FOR GARLAND BUT ALSO OUR ADJACENT CITIES, WHICH PUTS ADDITIONAL FLOW REQUIREMENTS ON THOSE PLANTS. AND THOSE PLANTS ARE AT CAPACITY, ESSENTIALLY. AND WE'RE HAVING CHALLENGES WITH PEAK FLOWS. SO. T-C-EQ HAS SOME REQUIREMENTS. AS YOU START TO REACH PLANT CAPACITY, THEY MAKE YOU START TO PLAN AND THEN THEY MAKE YOU START TO CONSTRUCT THE CAPACITY NECESSARY FOR LONG TERM WASTEWATER PLANNING. SO AS WE GET INTO THOSE ADDITIONAL FLOWS AND THE PERMIT RENEWALS THAT GO WITH THOSE PLANTS, THE REGULATORS ALSO LOOKING AT INCREASING YOUR CAPABILITIES ON WHAT YOU'RE ABLE TO TREAT, THEY WANT TO NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN LOOK AT AMMONIA. THEY WANT TO LOOK AT TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS, PFAS, SOME OF THOSE ADDITIONAL THINGS THAT ADD TO THE COST OF INCREASING THAT PLANT SIZE. SO THOSE TRIGGERS BECOME ENACTED WHEN YOU START TO GET ADDITIONAL INI. AND SO WE'RE WE'RE TRYING TO MINIMIZE THAT AS MUCH AS WE CAN WITH, WITH OUR EXISTING STAFF. WE'VE BEEN VERY REACTIONARY WITHIN GARLAND OVER THE PAST DECADE AT LEAST. THERE'S NOT A LOT OF PROACTIVE WORK GOING IN TO PREVENT SOME THINGS. AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO CHANGE THAT CULTURE A LITTLE BIT, TRYING TO FOCUS OUR OUR STAFF ON NOT HITTING THE EMERGENCIES, BUT TRYING TO GET THEM BEFORE THEY ARE EMERGENCIES. THOSE EMERGENCIES ARE SO EXPENSIVE TO REPAIR, AND YOU HAVE LIMITED TIME CAPABILITIES TO BE ABLE TO MAKE THOSE CHANGES. IT'S MUCH BETTER TO TRY TO PROACTIVELY ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES, AND THAT'S WHERE WE'RE HEADED FROM A FROM A WATER UTILITIES PERSPECTIVE. BUT OUR BEST ASSETS ARE OUR PEOPLE. WE HAVE SOME SIGNIFICANTLY VERY QUALIFIED STAFF, AND IT'S JUST GETTING THEM ORGANIZED, GETTING SOME GOOD LEADERSHIP. WE'VE REORGANIZED ABOUT A YEAR AGO, AND WE'RE STARTING TO HAVE GOOD PRODUCTIVITY WITHIN OUR TEAMS, AND WE THINK WE CAN TAKE ON SOME ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES IF WE PRIORITIZE THOSE PROJECTS CORRECTLY. SO REALLY GOOD WORK FORCE, ALTHOUGH THEY ARE MOVING UP AND THROUGH THE AGE OF WORKFORCE, WE'RE TRYING TO BRING IN NEWER, NEW, NEWER GENERATION AND TRYING TO TRAIN THEM UP AND HELP US. BUT THAT'S BEEN N A ALLENGE. SO SOME OF THE THINGS AS WE GO INTO THE BUDGET, ONE OF THE THINGS IS WE'RE PROPOSING ADDITIONAL WATER CONSTRUCTION CREW IN THE CAPITAL BUDGET. WE HAD ABOUT A HALF $1 MILLION JUST FOR HYDRANT REPLACEMENT. AND AS WE LOOK AT THAT, THE HYDRANTS THAT WE WERE BIDDING, WE WERE GETTING PRICES OF 20 TO $25,000 PER HYDRANT REPLACED. SO ONE

[02:55:06]

HYDRANT 20 TO 25,000. MY TEAM CAN DO THAT FOR 5000. SO WE'RE TRYING TO FORM OUR TEAMS, BECOME EFFICIENT FROM A HYDRANT CREW TO BE ABLE TO GET AT SOME OF THESE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES FOR THE CITY IS PROVIDING FIREFIGHTING WATER FOR FIRE SERVICES. SO JUST SIMPLY HERE WE HAVE ONGOING HALF $1 MILLION IN THE CAPITAL PROGRAM FOR HYDRANT REPLACEMENT, THAT IT JUST KIND OF SHOCKS ME THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT SPENDING THOSE DOLLARS. I DON'T WANT TO SPEND THOSE DOLLARS IN THAT WAY. I THINK WE CAN DO IT BETTER, FASTER INTERNALLY. SO WE'RE PROPOSING SOME ADDITIONAL CREWS WITH SOME EQUIPMENT TO BE ABLE TO RESPOND TO THOSE TYPE OF HYDRANT REPLACEMENTS, BUT THEY CAN ALSO HIT MAIN REPLACEMENTS AS WELL, WHERE YOU DON'T HAVE TO FULLY RELY ON CONTRACTORS. CONTRACTORS PRICING IS SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASING OVER TIME, AND WHERE IN THE PAST IT MAY HAVE BEEN A BENEFIT TO BE ABLE TO OUTSOURCE SOME OF THIS WORK, IT'S NO LONGER THAT MODE ANYMORE. CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE REALLY HIGH, AND I THINK WE CAN DO IT INTERNALLY BETTER AND FASTER AND CHEAPER. SO WE'RE PROPOSING SOME ADDITIONAL CREW THERE.

WASTEWATER INFLOW. THESE ARE FOUR FTES THAT WOULD FOCUS ON ENI AND TRYING TO PREVENT ENI GOING INTO THE SYSTEM. SO AS I SAID WE HAVE CUSTOMER CITIES THAT ARE HAVE INCREASED ENI, BUT SO DOES GARLAND. SO WE'RE TRYING TO QUANTIFY THAT, BUT WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH STAFF DEDICATED TO THAT PROGRAM. SO WE'RE PROPOSING ADDITIONAL STAFF TO BE ABLE TO GO AFTER THIS ENI PROGRAM. THAT WOULD THEN IF WE DIDN'T DO THAT, WE WOULD THEN DOMINO INTO SOME MORE PLANT EXPANSIONS, WHICH IS EVEN MORE EXPENSIVE TO. YEAH. SO THE ENI IS INFLOW, WHICH IS FROM CREEKS OR STREAMS THAT FLOW INTO YOUR SYSTEM, OR INFILTRATION, WHERE YOU HAVE CRACKED PIPES IN THE GROUND AND GROUNDWATER CAN GET INTO YOUR SYSTEM. THUS THEN TAXING YOUR WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM. AND IT'S REALLY TREATING WATER YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD TO TREAT BEFORE. YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE TO TREAT CREEK WATER. IT'S NOT DESIGNED FOR THAT. AND OUR PLANTS AREN'T DESIGNED FOR THAT.

SO INFLOW AND INFILTRATION IS A BIG CHALLENGE FOR MOST CITIES. AND SO AS WE HAVE BEEN REACTIVE IN THE CITY OF GARLAND, WE'RE TRYING TO PUT SOME MORE PROACTIVE EFFORTS TO TRY TO PREVENT THOSE ISSUES THAT THEN DRIVE US INTO ADDITIONAL COST FOR TREATMENT. SO WE HAVE SOME CHALLENGES AT OUR PLANTS. THEY'RE AGING PLANTS. A LOT OF MAINTENANCE HAS BEEN DEFERRED, AND WE'RE ENCOUNTERING A LOT OF THOSE PROBLEMS. AND SO WE'RE LOOKING TO HIRE TWO MORE MECHANICS TO ONE AT DUCK AND ONE AT ROWLETT CREEK PLANT TO HELP US CATCH UP ON AND TRY TO MITIGATE SOME OF THOSE FAILING PUMPS, FAILING VALVES, SOME OF THOSE THINGS THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH AGING PLANTS. BUT WE'RE VERY LEAN AT THESE AREAS. SO FOR SOME REASON, AND WHAT I'M UNDERSTANDING IS PROBABLY IN THE 2010 TIMELINE. 2008 2010 TIMELINE, THEY REALLY STREAMLINED AND MINIMIZED STAFF. AND SO WE'RE SEEING THE EFFECTS OF THAT. THEY USED MORE OUTSOURCED CONTRACTS, AND WE'RE SEEING THAT CATCH UP TO US NOW. AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO PROACTIVELY ADDRESS THOSE CHALLENGES TO KEEP THESE PLANTS RUNNING TO MAKE SURE WE DON'T HAVE ANY EMERGENCIES. SO THESE TWO MECHANICS WOULD HELP US TOWARDS THOSE EFFORTS. WE'RE LOOKING FOR MORE HYDRO EXCAVATORS FOR THE FIELD MAINTENANCE, WHICH CAN HELP US FOR A VARIETY OF PURPOSES, BUT IT HELPS US PREVENT HITTING OTHER UTILITIES, AND PARTICULARLY WHERE UTILITIES CROSS, WE CAN AVOID THOSE HITS. IT CAN ALSO HELP US WITH OUR ENI PROGRAM ON HELP CLEANING MAINS. SO A COUPLE OF DUAL PURPOSES THERE FOR HYDRO EXCAVATORS.

WE'RE LOOKING FOR A COMPACT TRACK LOADER TO HELP US MAKE REPAIRS TO THE SEWER MAINS.

THESE ARE SMALLER TRACKED LOADERS THAT CAN. IT'S JUST ONE THAT WE CAN HELP MAKE REPAIRS TO THE SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM. WE OF COURSE, AS WE REORGANIZED WE HAVE NOW MORE IN-FIELD SUPERVISION WITH REGARDRD TO R FOREMAN. SO WE'RE LOOKING FOR SOME SUPPORT TRUCKS FOR THOSE SUPERINTENDENTS. AND THEN A MINI EXCAVATOR. THIS IS NOT A LARGE ONE. THIS IS A VERY SMALL ONE THAT CAN GET INTO SMALL UTILITY EASEMENTS TO MAKE REPAIRS ON OUR MAINS OR IN SOME CASES, LATERALS THAT GO INTO THE MAINS FOR THE SEWER SYSTEM. SO WE FIND OURSELVES FREQUENTLY IN REALLY TIGHT CONFINES, AND WE NEED SOME SMALLER EQUIPMENT TO BE ABLE TO GET ACCESS TO THOSE REPAIRS. AND THEN WE'VE HAD SOME MOWING CONTRACTS BEFORE. WE REALLY HAVE HAD STAFF TRY TO TAKE ON SOME MOWING ATTEMPTS AND TRY TO MAINTAIN, BUT WE'RE TRYING TO FOCUS OUR STAFF ON CORE BUSINESS

[03:00:02]

UTILITIES AND THOSE OPERATIONS OF MANAGING AND WORKING ON THE PLANT, RATHER THAN WEEDING AND MOWING. IN ADDITION TO THAT, THE LANDSCAPE MOWING PRICES HAVE GONE UP, AND SO WE WENT OUT FOR BIDS AND WE HAVE SIGNIFICANT INCREASES IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT, PLANT MOWING AND TRIMMING AND ALL THAT TYPE OF STUFF TO KEEP KEEP THAT GRASS DOWN, KEEP THOSE FACILITIES IN SHAPE AND TRY TO REDIRECT STAFF AS WELL. BACK TO THEIR CORE BUSINESS OF MAINTAINING PUMPS AND MOTORS AND VALVES, THOSE TYPE OF THINGS. SO IN SUMMARY, ROUGHLY A $2.5 MILLION REQUEST ONGOING OF THAT $930,000. BUT I SEE SOME OPPORTUNITIES FOR SIGNIFICANT PAYBACK VERSUS HIRING CONTRACTORS TO DO SOME OF THIS WORK. I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE HELP US ENHANCE OUR ABILITY TO BE PROACTIVE VERSUS REACTIVE ON SOME OF THAT, AND A WISER USE OF OUR DOLLAR. ANDREW, I'VE GOT A COUPLE SLIDES ON OUR PROPOSED RATES FOR THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE. SO ON THE WATER SIDE, WE'RE PROPOSING A 4.8% RATE INCREASE. AND THIS IS BASED ON THE AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL BILL. SO 4.8% INCREASE ON THE WATER SIDE. THAT'S ABOUT $3.11 PER MONTH. AND ON THE WASTEWATER SIDE, A 4.2% INCREASE JUST UNDER A DOLLAR AND A HALF. SO FOR THE AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER, THEIR WATER AND SEWER BILL WILL GO UP BY 4.6%, OR $4.57. HERE'S A COMPARISON OF THE OTHER REGIONAL CITIES. THESE ARE OTHER NORTH TEXAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT MEMBER CITIES, AND YOU CAN SEE THAT GARLAND THERE. TOWARDS THE BOTTOM WE HAVE GARLAND CURRENT RATES AND GARLAND'S PROPOSED RATES. ALL THE OTHER CITIES WE'VE LISTED HERE. THIS IS THEIR CURRENT RATES. THEY'RE ALL GOING THROUGH THE SAME THING WE ARE RIGHT NOW. THEY'RE PROPOSING RATE INCREASES AS WELL. I'VE I'VE DONE A QUICK SURVEY ON SOME OF THESE OTHER CITIES. AND PLANO, RICHARDSON, WYLIE. THEY'RE IN THE 5 TO 6% RATE INCREREASE. ROWLETT. THEY'E CLOSER TO NINE. AND THEN FRISCO 40 A COUPLE OF THE OTHERS, THEY'RE LOOKING AT 9 TO 15% RATE INCREASES. SO WHAT WE'RE DOING AT ABOUT 4.5% IS ACTUALLY LOWER THAN WHAT WE'VE SOME OF OUR NEIGHBORING CITIES ARE DOING. SO WE KEEP THIS UPDATED. WE PAY REALLY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THIS. WE WANT TO DEFINITELY BE BELOW THAT MIDPOINT, BUT ALSO TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE RECOVERING OUR COSTS, MAINTAINING THE DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE RATIOS, MAINTAINING THE RESERVES IN OUR IN OUR FUNDS TO KEEP THE UTILITY WHOLE AND ABLE TO RESPOND TO CHANGING REQUIREMENTS THAT MIKE WAS SAYING REGULATORY INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS. THERE'S A LOT OF NEEDS IN OUR SYSTEM. YEAH. THANK YOU. AND HERE'S A QUICK CHART ON OUR FIVE YEAR RATE FORECAST. SO EACH YEAR FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. AND WE'LL COME BACK TO COUNCIL EACH YEAR TO TALK ABOUT THESE RATES. BUT WE'RE LOOKING AT ABOUT FOUR AND A HALF TO 5% RATE INCREASES OVERALL FOR WATER AND SEWER. I ALSO WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THE NORTH TEXAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RATES FOR WHOLESALE WATER ARE INCREASING AT HIGHER RATES EACH YEAR. SO OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, THEY'VE PROPOSED SEVEN, 11, 13% INCREASES. SO OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, OUR WHOLELE WATER COSTS ARE PROJECTED TO INCREASE BY 56%. AND OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS, THAT RATE IS PROJECTED TO DOUBLE. SO THERE'S A SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENTS THAT NORTH TEXAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT HAS TO MAKE IN THEIR SYSTEM TO PROVIDE SUPPLY, WATER SUPPLY FOR THIS REGION AND INFRASTRUCTURE, TREATMENT PLANTS, PIPELINES. AND SO I WANTED TO POINT OUT THAT WE ARE A WATER CUSTOMER FOR NORTH TEXAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT.

WE BUY WHOLESALE WATER, BUT WE DO NOT USE THEIR WASTEWATER TREATMENT SERVICES. CITIES THAT USE NORTH TEXAS FOR TREATMENT. THEY ARE LOOKING AT 15 TO 30% INCREASES OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL YEARS FOR THOSE TREATMENT SERVICES. THAT COVERS PLANO, RICHARDSON, SOME OF THE OTHERS AROUND HERE. SO NORTH TEXAS IS HAS SOME HUGE RATE INCREASES ON THE WATER SIDE, BUT EVEN WORSE ON THE WASTEWATER SIDE. SO WE'RE NOT REQUIRED. YOU KNOW, WE HAVE OUR OWN TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY, WHICH IS REALLY IT SHOULD SAVE MONEY FOR THE RESIDENTS IN THE NEXT DECADE, AS NORTH TEXAS RATES KIND OF SKYROCKET. THAT'S IT. AND WITH THAT, ANY QUESTIONS? YES, MAYOR PRO TEM LUCK. HI. SO OTHER OTHER CITIES USE OUR WASTEWATER SERVICES, CORRECT? CORRECT. OH,

[03:05:09]

I DIDN'T REALLY SEE ANY DEDICATED TO THAT IN THE SLIDE. SO HOW ARE WE CHARGING THEM? CAN WE OFFSET SOME OF THESE FEES WE'RE CHARGING OUR RESIDENTS AND PUT THEM TO THOSE CITIES THAT ARE USING OUR SERVICES. ABSOLUTELY. YES. SO PART OF OUR ANNUAL RATE SURVEY, WE DO LOOK AT THOSE OTHER CUSTOMER CITIES RATES. THOSE INCREASES ARE PROJECTED TO BE BETWEEN 5 AND 10% FOR THIS NEXT YEAR. SO A COUPLE OF THE CITIES, THEY ARE RIGHT THERE AT COST OF SERVICE AND KIND OF INCREASING AT THE SAME RATE AS OUR RESIDENTIAL IS. BUT A COUPLE OF THEM HAVE HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE CATCHING UP TO DO. SO I BELIEVE IT'S ROWLETT AND SAXY, BUT I'D HAVE TO DOUBLE CHECK ARE CLOSER TO ABOUT 10% RATE INCREASES WHILE WE GET THOSE COST OF SERVICE RATES.

WITH OUR ACTUAL RATES IN LINE. ALSO, TO KIND OF CONTINUE OFF THAT, SOME OF OUR MAJOR INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS, THEY HAVE RATES THAT ARE SET BASED ON THE STRENGTH OF THEIR WASTEWATER, AND SOME OF THEM ARE INCREASING AT HIGHER RATES THAN OUR OUR REGULAR RETAIL, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS. THEY SHOULD BE. YEAH. AND CATCH THEM UP BECAUSE I'D, I'D RATHER, YOU KNOW, CHARGE PEOPLE WHO ARE USING THAT SYSTEM MUCH MORE AND YOU KNOW, RESIDENTS ARE PAYING FOR IT THROUGH TAXES. SO THEY SHOULD HAVE THE LOWEST OF THE FEES. I KNOW THAT THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, OUR OUR WASTEWATER FACILITIES ARE OLD AND HAVEN'T HAD A LOT OF ATTENTION, WHICH IS WHY THERE ARE SO MANY ASKS FOR ALL THE THINGS IN THESE SLIDES. WHEN DO YOU ANTICIPATE US NEEDING TO DO LIKE AN ACTUAL OVERHAUL OF OUR SYSTEM? SO OUR FACILITIES AT YOUR AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING, WE HAVE A PROPOSAL FOR A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN EFFORT. OKAY. SO IT WILL LOOK AT BOTH PLANTS AND THEN ACTUALLY LOOK AT BOTH PLANTS IN TANDEM TO FIGURE OUT IF THERE'S A WAY TO OPTIMIZE ALL THREE OR MAYBE THREE SCENARIOS THERE. SO THAT'LL COME ON HOPEFULLY FOR YOUR PRESENTATION TUESDAY. AND THEN THAT'LL TAKE ABOUT A YEAR TO EVALUATE ALL THE OPTIONS. BUT THEN WE SHOULD HAVE A PLAN, NOT ONLY A PLAN FOR TYPES OF TREATMENT AND MEETING THE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS THAT THE STATE LIKELY WOULD PUT ON US, BUT ALSO DESCRIBE OUR CAPACITY AND THEN A CAPITAL PLAN THAT SOMEHOW WE'VE GOT TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO PAY FOR THAT. AND SO THAT'S A BIG CONCERN OF OURS RIGHT NOW IS, YOU KNOW, THE CAPACITY THAT WE HAVE IS PRECIOUS. AND SO WE'RE ANXIOUS TO GET THIS CONTRACTOR ON BOARD AND START LOOKING AT THIS MASTER PLAN FOR US TO FIGURE OUT WHAT IS OUR PATH FORWARD. OKAY. YEAH.

AND SAME THING. YOU KNOW, WE HAVE TO PAY FOR THIS. AND THAT COST SHOULD BE KIND OF SUBSIDIZED BY OTHER USERS. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. THANK YOU MAYOR. JUST A COUPLE QUESTIONS ON BACK UP TO THE SLIDE THAT SHOWS THE EQUIPMENT THAT YOU ARE DREAMING ABOUT ASKING FOR. IS THERE A SPECIFIC ONE YOU WANTED TO SEE BACK UP? THE SLIDE THAT HAS ALL OF THEM? OH, OKAY. SORRY. YEAH. RIGHT THERE. MICHAEL HAS HAS SINCE YOU'VE BEEN BEEN ON BOARD, HAS THERE BEEN A, AN AN INVENTORY TO ASSESS EXISTING EQUIPMENT COMPARED TO THAT. AND IF SO HOW WOULD THAT COME OUT? IF NOT, WHEN DO WE PROPOSE IT TO INVENTORY THE EXISTING EQUIPMENT. THAT'S THAT'S MY FIRST QUESTION. SO WE HAVE A GOOD INVENTORY OF ALL THE EQUIPMENT THAT WE POSSESS. SOME OF THE CHALLENGES, PARTICULARLY LARGE EQUIPMENT IS GETTING REPLACEMENT PARTS AND HAVING DOWNTIME ON THAT EQUIPMENT THAT IMPACTS OUR OPERATIONS. SO, FOR EXAMPLE, ONE OF THE FACTOR COMBOS, IN SOME CASES, YOU COULD BE LOOKING AT SIX MONTHS JUST WAITING ON A PART. AND SO WE HAVE STAFF THAT'S ASSIGNED TO THAT PIECE OF EQUIPMENT. SO WE'LL HAVE TO REDIRECT THAT STAFF TO OTHER DUTIES UNTIL THAT EQUIPMENT IS REPAIRED. SO THOSE ARE SOME OF THE CHALLENGES. BUT BUT ALSO WE USED TO HAVE SOME EQUIPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THAT THEY HAVE LET LAPSE IN AND DIDN'T CHOOSE TO RENEW. AND SO SOME OF THAT EQUIPMENT HAS IS NOT THERE

[03:10:01]

ANYMORE. THEY AUCTIONED IT OFF. AND, AND AS THEY. AS THEY REDUCED STAFFING TO BE MORE MAINTENANCE AND RESPONSIVE, THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES CEASED AS WELL. AND THEY OUTSOURCED THAT. SO TO BE ABLE TO BE ABLE TO START CONSTRUCTION AND PERFORM SOME OF THAT, WE NEED THIS EQUIPMENT TO BE ABLE TO HELP US DO THAT JOB DONE. AND DO YOU SEE THIS EQUIPMENT AS SUPPLEMENTING THE EXISTING EQUIPMENT OR REPLACING THE EXISTING. IT'LL BE ACTUALLY NEW EQUIPMENT WHERE WE WOULD ACTUALLY. SUPPLEMENT POSSIBLY THAT COULD THAT COULD BE FOR EXAMPLE, WHEN SOME OF THAT EQUIPMENT IS IN THE SHOP, WE HAVE ANOTHER PIECE TO GO TO. BUT FOR EXAMPLE, THE CONSTRUCTION CREW EQUIPMENT, THERE IS NO EQUIPMENT THAT WE CAN GO RIGHT TO RIGHT NOW UNLESS WE RENT IT. AND SO WE WOULD DESIRE TO HAVE THAT AVAILABLE TO STAFF YEAR ROUND SO THAT THEY CAN GET THE CONSTRUCTION WORK DONE. OKAY. SO ALL OF THAT, THAT THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS REALLY IS REQUESTED. BUT IT'S ALSO NEEDED. RIGHT. ABSOLUTELY. OKAY. OKAY.

RATE INCREASES. OKAY. TELL ME AGAIN. NO. COME AGAIN. WHAT WHAT WE'RE WHAT OUR GOAL IS AND WHY.

SO WE HAVE SEVERAL METRICS THAT WE ARE. IT'S OUR GOAL TO MEET EACH YEAR. SO ONE OF THOSE IS OUR DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE RATIO. IT'S SOMETHING THAT OUR RATING AGENCIES LOOK AT VERY CLOSELY.

WHENEVER WE GO OUT FOR REVENUE BOND SALE TO GET THOSE BEST INTEREST PRICES. SO THEY WANT TO SEE A 1.6% COVERAGE TO KNOW THAT WE CAN COVER THOSE DEBTS. SO THAT'S THAT'S ONE OF THE MAJOR THINGS. ANOTHER IS JUST RECOVERING OUR COSTS. SO OVER THE FIVE YEAR RATE PLAN PERIOD, WITH OUR PROJECTIONS, THE INCREASED COSTS FOR WATER FROM NORTH TEXAS AS WELL AS OUR INCREASING OPERATIONAL COSTS, WE WANT TO KIND OF MAINTAIN THAT POSITIVE COST RECOVERY SO WE DON'T START LOSING MONEY. SO THOSE ARE THE TWO MAIN METRICS THAT I'M TRYING TO MAINTAIN WITH OUR FIVE YEAR RATE PLAN. SO WE ALSO WANT TO KEEP THOSE RATES SMOOTH. YOU KNOW, SOMETHING THAT'S NOT GOING UP AND DOWN EACH YEAR. IF WE CAN COME UP WITH A KIND OF SMOOTH RATE PLAN, SIMILAR RATE INCREASES EACH YEAR FOR OUR CUSTOMERS. THAT'S ANOTHER THING THAT WE TRY TO MAINTAIN. WE DON'T WANT TO HAVE ANY VOLATILITY THERE. I THINK I SAW ONE, ONE OF THE CHARTS, YOUR FIVE YEAR PROJECTION AS IT RELATES TO RATES. WHAT'S THE GOAL AND HOW DO YOU PLAN ON IMEMENTING THAT. THOSE INCREASES OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. YEAH. SO EACH YEAR WE'RE LOOKING AT ABOUT 4.5% RATE INCREASES. AND LIKE I SAID EARLIER THAT THAT'S JUST TO MAINTAIN THOSE MINIMUM METRICS OF DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE RATIO AND COST RECOVERY. SO WE REALLY THOSE ARE THE THINGS THAT WE WORK WITH ON OUR RATE CONSULTANT TO MAINTAIN. AND IF WE FALL BELOW THOSE THINGS, YOU KNOW, OUR OUR FINANCING COSTS FOR OUR DEBT CAN BECOME MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE. SO IT'S REALLY, YOU KNOW, MAINTAINING THAT COST OF SERVICE AND MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE RECOVERING OUR COSTS AS UTILITIES. SO YOUR MESSAGE TO THE RATEPAYERS IS WHAT WOULD BE WOULD BE WHAT BASED ON YOUR FORECAST PROJECTIONS FOR THIS, THIS BUDGET WOULD BE WHAT HOW WOULD YOU SELL THIS TO RATEPAYERS THAT WE HAVE INCREASING COSTS FROM OUR WHOLESALE WATER PROVIDER. THOSE THOSE COSTS ARE INCREASING BY NINE, 10%. AND THAT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT CONTRACTUALLY WE HAVE TO PAY. AND SO WHEN OUR COSTS GO UP, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE TO PUSH SOME OF THOSE INCREASES TO OUR CUSTOMERS AS WELL TO MAINTAIN THE, THE FINANCIAL STABILITY OF THE UTILITY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, I THINK. I THINK ONE ADDITIONAL THANK YOU. YOU'RE ABOUT TO SAY SOMETHING. I THINK ONE ADDITIONAL COMPONENT TO THAT IS FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, GARLAND HAS A TREMENDOUS OPPORTUNITY HERE WITH ITS TWO PLANTS, TO BE ABLE TO KEEP RATES LOWER THAN WHAT OTHER SURROUNDING CITIES ARE SEEING FOR WASTEWATER CHARGES. SO THERE'S A BENEFIT TO OWNING THEIR OWN PLANTS COMPARED TO OUTSOURCING THAT AND ASKING SOMEBODY ELSE TO PROVIDE THOSE

[03:15:04]

SERVICES. SO WHOEVER THOUGHT OF THOSE PLANTS YEARS AGO, IT WAS WISE. AND WE'RE IN A STRATEGICALLY UNIQUE POSITION COMPARED TO OTHER CITIES TO BE ABLE TO CONTROL OUR DESTINY WITH REGARD TO WHAT OUR SEWER RATES WILL BE. BUT ALSO WE NEED TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT HOW WE RECOVER SOME OF THOSE EXPENSES AND HOW WE CAN ASK THOSE ADJACENT CITIES THAT WE SERVE TO HELP US PARTICIPATE IN GROWING THOSE PLANTS AND FIXING THEM AND REPAIRING THEM. BUT WE'RE IN A UNIQUE POSITION TO BE ABLE TO KE ADVANTAGE OF THOSE PLANTS. WHERE MANY OTHER CITIES DON'T HAVE ANY OPTION, THEY HAVE TO GO OUTSOURCE. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. COUNCILMEMB DUTTON. COULD YOU POSSIBLY SEND US THE BILL COMPARISON FOR ROWLETT AND SAXY, AS WELL AS WHAT WE'RE CHARGING COMMERCIAL RATES? SURE. WHENEVER YOU WHENEVER YOU HAVE A MOMENT TO BREATHE, I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MA'AM. COUNCILMEMBER MOORE. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. SO IT SOUNDS LIKE WHAT WE'RE SAYING. OR MAYBE YOU SHOULD EXPLAIN IT, THAT THE FEES ARE STRUCTURED SUCH THAT WHEN PAID AND EVERYTHING WORKS APPROPRIATELY, THE FACILITY THEN BECOMES SELF-SUFFICIENT, THAT YOU'RE ABLE TO KEEP THE FACILITY GOING AND STILL HAVE A RATE OF RETURN TO RETURN MONIES TO THE GENERAL FUND. IS THAT WHAT WE'RE SAYING? ABSOLUTELY. I THINK THAT'S THE PERFECT WORD. IDEALLY, THAT WOULD BE THE SCENARIO THAT WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE. SO EVEN WHEN I SEE THAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR DIFFERENT EQUIPMENTS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE, THE FEE STRUCTURE IS SUCH THAT IT'S ESTABLISHED TO ASSURE THAT THE FACILITY WILL BE SELF-SUFFICIENT. WE WILL HAVE A RATE OF RETURN WHERE WE CAN ACTUALLY GET MONEY BACK INTO THE GENERAL FUND. YEAH, I SAY IT AGAIN BECAUSE I'M GO AHEAD. IF I CAN ADD TO THAT. REALLY THE WATER AND WASTEWATER FUNDS ARE SET UP COMPLETELY SEPARATE FROM THE GENERAL FUND, SO THAT THERE WOULDN'T BE A TRANSFER BACK TO THE GENERAL FUND. THE RATES THAT WE'RE SETTING ARE TO COVER THE COST OF ESSENTIALLY DELIVERING WATER TO HOMES AND TREATING THE SEWER THAT COMES FROM HOMES AND BUSINESSESES. WE DON'T WE DON'T REALLY RETURN FUNDS BACK TO THE GENERAL FUND. THESE ARE INDEPENDENTLY OPERATING UTILITY FUNDS. OKAY. SO WHAT THE FEES TAKE CARE OF THE SALARIES, TAKE CARE OF THE EQUIPMENT AND THINGS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PRESENTLY. YES, THE FEES TAKE CARE OF ALL OF THAT. THIS FACILITY IS SELF-SUFFICIENT. YES. YEAH. THAT'S THE GOAL.

THAT'S WHAT I WANT TO GET TO. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? WATER, WASTEWATER. THAT'S NEXT TIME YOU COME. MAKE SURE YOU BRING THE AGE OF THE TRAILER THAT YOU'RE. WHEN YOU'RE ASKING FOR EQUIPMENT. ALL RIGHT, WE'LL MOVE ON THEN TO OUR NEXT ITEM. IT'S THE SANITATION UTILITY FUND.

ALL RIGHT. GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. MAYOR. COUNCIL. MR. CITY MANAGER, THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE SANITATION DEPARTMENT TODAY, WE HAVE A PRETTY STANDARD REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL TO HELP US MAINTAIN OUR CURRENT SERVICE LEVELS IN OUR RESIDENTIAL SERVICES DIVISION AND ALSO TO HELP US CONTINUE GROWING OUR COMMERCIAL SERVICES DIVISION. AND AT THE END, WE'LL ALSO HAVE SOME RATES THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE TO COUNCIL. SO OUR FIRST REQUEST IS GOING TO BE FOR $65,000 FOR A SANITATION DRIVER TO THAT WILL BE USED AS A FLOATER BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL WASTE AND RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING DIVISION.

CURRENTLY WE HAVE 18 COLLECTION ROUTES IN RESIDENTIAL WASTE AND SEVEN COLLECTION ROUTES IN RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING, AND WE HAVE A TOTAL OF 26 EMPLOYEES. THAT ONLY GIVES US 3.5% BACKUP RATIO. THE INDUSTRY STANDARD IS 20%. SO WE'RE HOPING THAT ADDING THIS POSITION WILL GIVE US SOME FLEXIBILITY. WHENEVER WE HAVE EMPLOYEES EITHER OUT SICK, INJURED, OR TAKING TIME OFF.

COUNCIL. I ALSO WANT TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO BRAG ABOUT THIS EMPLOYEES. THEY DO THIS TWO DIVISIONS COMBINED DO ABOUT 405,000 COLLECTIONS PER MONTH. THAT'S 4.8 COLLECTIONS, 4.8 MILLION COLLECTIONS PER YEAR. THE COLLECTION RATE FOR THIS TWO DIVISIONS COMBINED IS. 99.9996%.

[03:20:13]

ALL RIGHT. SO WE'RE HOPING THAT BY ADDING THIS POSITION, WE'LL, YOU KNOW, WILL HELP US WITH THAT 0.0004%. WE'RE ALSO ASKING FOR ANOTHER FLOATER. ANOTHER ANOTHER SANITATION DRIVER THAT WILL BE USED AS A FLOATER BETWEEN THE BRUSH AND BULKY DIVISION AND OUR TRANSFER STATION OR BRUSH AND BULKY DIVISION IS THE LARGEST DIVISION WITHIN THE SANITATION DEPARTMENT WITH 38 EMPLOYEES.

HOWEVER, OUR MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ARE 36 EMPLOYEES. THAT'S SIX CREWS OF SIX EMPLOYEES EACH.O THAT ONLY GIVES US A BACKUP RATIO OF 5%. ONCE AGAIN, INDUSTRY STANDARD IS 20%. IN THE TRANSFER STATION, WE HAVE A TOTAL OF NINE EMPLOYEES. WE DON'T HAVE AN BACKUPS.

THAT'S OUR MINIMUM. SO WHENEVER SOMEBODY IS OUT ON VACATION SICK RIGHT NOW, I HAVE TWO DRIVERS FROM THE TRANSFER STATION. THEY'VE BEEN OUT FOR A COUPLE OF MONTHS ON MEDICAL LEAVE, SO I'VE HAD TO USE DRIVERS FROM OTHER DIVISIONS TO SUPPLEMENT AND CONTINUE THE OPERATION. ON AVERAGE, THE BRUSH AND BULKY DIVISION DOES ABOUT 91212,000 COLLECTIONS PER YEAR, AND THEIR COLLECTION RATE IS 99.9979%. REALLY GOOD NUMBERS. REALLY PROUD OF THOSE THOSE GUYS. WE'RE ALSO ASKING FOR FUNDING FOR THREE SANITATION HELPERS FOR THE BRUSH AND BULKY DIVISION. THESE ARE THE EMPLOYEES THAT YOU SEE IN THE BACK OF THE REAR LOADERS. WITHOUT A DOUBT, THIS IS THE MOST DIFFICULT JOB WITHIN THE SANITATION DEPARTMENT. IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW COLD IT IS, IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW HOT IT IS. THESE GUYS ARE OUT THERE PICKING UP TRASH, TAKING CARE OF OUR CITIZENS. WE CURRENTLY HAVE NINE FULL TIME POSITIONS, AND WE HAVE TO DEPEND ON TEMPORARY LABOR FOR THE OTHER THREE. THE PROBLEM WITH THAT IS, ONCE AGAIN, IT'S 100 DEGREES OUTSIDE. YOU'RE GETTING $16 AN HOUR. WE GET EMPLOYEES, TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES THAT SHOW UP FOR HALF A DAY.

THEY GO TO LUNCH AND THEY JUST DON'T COME BACK. HOWEVER, WE HAVE SEEN CONSISTENCY WITH THE FULL TIME EMPLOYEES. THE REASON FOR THAT IS THEY HAVE MOTIVATION, THEY HAVE INCENTIVES, THEY GET RETIREMENT, THEY GET SICK TIME, THEY GET VACATION TIME. SO WE HAVE A LOT MORE CONSISTENCY WITH THIS FULL TIME EMPLOYEES. IF I CAN CHIME IN ON THAT AS WELL. YOU'VE ALSO DONE A GREAT JOB IN BUILDING WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT A GROWTH MODEL FOR THOSE THAT ARE INDIVIDUALS THAT COME IN THAT MAY NOT HAVE A COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE OR EXPERIENCE OPERATING EQUIPMENT, THIS IS REALLY A STARTING POINT FOR THEM WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT. SO THEY CAN COME IN, THEY GET THAT FULL TIME JOB, THEY GET THE BENEFITS THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, AND THEN THEY HAVE AN ABILITY TO GROW FROM THERE. IF THEY IF THEY HAVE THAT. SO HAVING THOSE THAT ARE FULL TIME EMPLOYEES, THEY CAN GET PUT ON THAT TRACK IF THEY HAVE THAT INITIATIVE.

CORRECT. WE ACTUALLY PAY FOR THEIR CDL FOR THOSE HELPERS THAT HAVE BEEN WITH THE DEPARTMENT FOR A YEAR OR TWO, AND THEY WANT TO CONTINUE GROWING WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT. WE HELP THEM GET IS GOING TO BE FOR ANOTHERQUEST SANITATION DVER, TWO FOR COMMERCIAL SERVICES DIVISION.

UNLIKE THE OTHER DRIVER POSITIONS, THIS ONE IS NOT GOING TO BE USED AS A BACKUP. THIS IS GOING TO BE USED TO CONTINUE GOING OUT THERE PURSUING NEW ACCOUNTS. WE HAVE A LOT OF COMPETITION IN GARLAND. WE COMPETE AGAINST 49 PRIVATE HAULERS, BUT WE STILL THINK THAT THERE'S A LOT OF OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO CONTINUE GOING OUT THERE MAKING MONEY. SO FAR THIS YEAR, WE'RE UP BY $561,000. THROUGH THE END OF JULY, WE ARE PROJECTING APPROXIMATELY $8 MILLION IN REVENUE JUST FROM THE COMMERCIAL SERVICES DIVISION. WHY IS THAT IMPORTANT? OUR COST OF SERVICE FOR THE COMMERCIAL SERVICES DIVISION IS ONLY $5 MILLION. THAT'S $3 MILLION OF ACTUAL PROFIT. AND THE WAY WE'RE USING THAT PROFIT IS WE'RE USING IT TO SUBSIDIZE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES DIVISION. HISTORICALLY, IT WAS THE OPPOSITE. SO THAT'S WHAT ALLOWS US TO KEEP OUR RESIDENTIAL RATE SO LOW, WITH THE LEVEL OF SERVICES THAT WE PROVIDE. SO IN SUMMARY, WE ARE ASKING FOR A TOTAL OF SIX EMPLOYEES, THREE DRIVERS AND THREE HELPERS FOR THE SANITATION DEPARTMENT. THAT'S $307,000 IN ONGOING FUNDING. AND WE'RE ALSO PROPOSING SOME RATE INCREASES.

WE ARE PROPOSING A $1.90 RATE INCREASE ON THE SINGLE CONTAINER RATE. CURRENTLY IS $24.08. IF COUNCIL APPROVES, THAT WOULD BE THE NEW RATE WILL BE $25.98. AND WE ARE PROJECTING APPROXIMATELY $1.3 MILLION IN NEW REVENUE. NOW, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I WANT TO POINT OUT IS WE'RE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT THAN THE OTHER TWO UTILITIES, ELECTRIC AND WATER. AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS WATER AND ELECTRIC. THE MORE YOU USE IT, THE HIGHER YOUR BILL IS GOING TO BE AT THE END

[03:25:01]

OF THE MONTH. IN SANITATION, YOUR CONTAINER CAN BE COMPLETELY FULL. YOU CAN CLEAN OUT YOUR GARAGE, MOVE OUT, PUT TEN CUBIC YARDS OF TRASH IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE IS GOING TO GET PICKED UP, AND YOUR BILL IS NOT GOING TO GO UP. SO THIS IS A FIXED COST MONTH OVER MONTH. AND THIS IS A COMPARISON WITH SURROUNDING MUNICIPALITIES. ONCE AGAIN, THE REASON WHY YOU SEE THE CITIES UP HERE IS BECAUSE THEY USE A SIMILAR COLLECTION SYSTEM AS THE CITY OF GARLAND. BASICALLY, THEY ARE SERVICED BY CITY EMPLOYEES. RIGHT NOW, RICHARDSON HAS GOT THE LOWEST RATE AT 2508. WE HAVE THE HIGHEST RATE AT 4057. IN DALLAS WE HAVE AN AVERAGE OF 2979, AND GARLAND IS ALMOST $4 BELOW THE AVERAGE AT 2598. NOW, PLEASE BE MINDFUL THAT ALL OF THESE CITIES ARE GOING THROUGH THEIR BUDGET PROCESS RIGHT NOW, JUST LIKE WE ARE. SO THERE'S A GOOD CHANCE THAT SOME OF THESE NUMBERS ARE GOING TO GO UP FOR THOSE CITIES. AND YOU'LL JUST BRING BACK A DISCUSSION WE HAD LAST YEAR, I BELIEVE, OF ALL THE CITIES LISTED HERE AS WELL, WE'RE THE ONLY ONE THAT OFFERS A WEEKLY BULK PICKUP AS WELL. THE OTHERS ARE MONTHLY OR A CALL FOR SERVICE REQUEST. THAT IS CORRECT. AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, IF YOU HAPPEN TO IF YOU HAVE A RENTAL PROPERTY, THE TENANT'S MOVING OUT. IF YOU'RE CLEANING OUT YOUR GARAGE, YOU SAID EVERYTHING OUTSIDE IS GOING TO BE COLLECTED AND YOUR RATE IS NOT GOING TO GO UP. WE'RE ALSO PROPOSING A $2 RATE INCREASE ON THE MULTIPLE CONTAINER RATE. CURRENTLY, THE FEE IS $10.10. IF APPROVED, THE NEW RATE WILL BE $12.10, AND WE ARE PROJECTING APPROXIMATELY $350,000 IN NEW REVENUE. AND THIS IS A COMPARISON WITH OTHER CITIES THAT ALSO HAVE THIS RATE. MESQUITE IS CURRENTLY THE LOWEST AT $10, FOLLOWED BY GARLAND AT 1210. WE HAVE AN AVERAGE OF 1449, AND PLANO HAS THE HIGHEST AVERAGE OF $20.50. I DO WANT TO POINT OUT THE REASON WHY THE CITY OF RICHARDSON AND THE CITY OF IRVING ARE NOT ON THIS CHART IS BECAUSE THEY ACTUALLY DON'T USE THE 96 GALLON CONTAINERS AND THE SIDE LOADERS TO FOR THEIR COLLECTION SYSTEM. THEY USE REAR LOADERS, HEAVY DUTY BAGS AND HELPERS FOR THEIR COLLECTION SYSTEM, SO THEREFORE THEY DO NOT HAVE AN ADDITIONAL CONTAINER FEE. AND THE LAST REQUEST THAT WE HAVE IS WE ARE PROPOSING A 10% INCREASE ON OUR COMMERCIAL RATES. THAT IS OUR FRONT LOAD AND ROLL OFF CONTAINERS FOR BUSINESSES THAT WE SERVICE IN GARLAND. WE ARE NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THIS 10%. TYPICALLY WHAT WE SEE IS ANYWHERE BETWEEN 20 AND 30% FROM OUR COMPETITORS. AS I SAID EARLIER, WE HAVE 49 THAT OPERATE WITHIN GARLAND CITY LIMITS, SO WE DO NOT ANTICIPATE LOSING ANY CUSTOMERS OVER. THIS IS THE COMPLETE OPPOSITE.

TYPICALLY, IF WE RUN INTO A BUSINESS THAT IS NOT TIED TO A MULTI-YEAR CONTRACT, WE PICK THEM UP ON THE SPOT AND ONCE WE PICK THEM UP, THEY DON'T LEAVE US. EVEN WHEN WE DO 10% RATE INCREASES. IF COUNCIL APPROVES, WE ARE PROJECTING APPROXIMATELY $793,000 IN NEW REVENUE FROM THIS RATE INCREASE. THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. COUNCIL MEMBER DUTTON. THANK YOU. MURIEL, CAN YOU TELL ME, WHAT IS IT COST THE CITY TO REPLACE A POLYKARP $57? OKAY. I WOULD PERSONALLY LIKE TO SEE THE SECOND CART RATE BE INCREASED. FAR MORE THAN $12.10.

IF WE'RE CHARGING 24, $25 FOR ONE CART. I FEEL LIKE OUR SECOND CART SHOULD BE AS CLOSE TO EQUAL TO THAT AS POSSIBLE. I DON'T THINK THAT. AND I HAVE A SECOND CART. OKAY, JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, I HAVE TWO CARTS BECAUSE SOMETIMES I FORGET TO PUT MY ONE CART OUT AND SO I NEED IT FOR THE NEXT LEAP. AND I, I DON'T I DON'T FEEL LIKE YOU NEED A. YOU DON'T NEED A GOLD STAR FOR NEEDING A SECOND CONTAINER. AND IF IT'S COSTING US $57 TO REPLACE THOSE, THEN WE NEED TO BE MAKING UP THAT DIFFERENCE SOMEHOW. SO I AM 100% ON BOARD WITH INCREASING THAT SECOND CONTAINER RATE FAR MORE THAN JUST $2. OTHERWISE. I APPRECIATE EVERYTHING THAT YOU GUYS DO. YOU GUYS ARE AMAZING. OUR CREWS ARE KNOCKING IT OUT OF THE PARK, AND I AM THANKFUL THAT WE HAVE NOT HAD ANY CATASTROPHIC, CATASTROPHIC EVENTS TO KEEP YOU GUYS IN OVERTIME THIS YEAR. SO THANK YOU SO MUCH OVER YET. THANK YOU MAYOYOR. THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBR BASS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU GUYS. AND I KNOW I'VE TALKED TO YOU ABOUT THIS BEFORE, BUT MAN, WHAT

[03:30:05]

YOU'VE DONE WITH OUR COMMERCIAL DIVISION IS JUST AMAZING. YOU KNOW IT'S NOTHING LIKE WHAT IT WAS BEFORE. BEFORE YOU TRANSFORMED IT I GUESS WHAT WAS SIX YEARS AGO OR WHATEVER AND JUST AMAZING. AND I HAVE PERSONALLY AND I KNOW MARGARET WAS ALLUDING TO THIS EARLIER TOO. ON THE COMMERCIAL SIDE, I WOULD REALLY LIKE IF WE COULD TAKE AN AGGRESSIVE LOOK AT COMPARISON RATES BECAUSE LIKE FOR EXAMPLE, I'VE HAD AT ONE TIME I HAD PAID PAID FOR SEVEN DIFFERENT COMMERCIAL TRASH ACCOUNTS ACROSS THE METROPLEX, AND MY ONE IN GARLAND WAS JUST SO MUCH CHEAPER. I MEAN, I HAD ONE IN FORT WORTH. IT WAS ABOUT $2,000 A MONTH, AND I THINK AT THE TIME I WAS PAYING LIKE 300 A MONTH HERE. JUST. YEAH, I MEAN, I THINK AND I KNOW WE'VE GOT A LOT OF COMPETITION, BUT I MEAN, LIKE, I THINK PROBABLY THE BIGGEST WOULD BE LIKE WASTE MANAGEMENT OR REPUBLIC. AND I MEAN, I GUARANTEE THEIR RATES ARE DOUBLE AND TRIPLE WHAT OURS ARE. I WOULD HAVE TO THINK SO. YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW. AND I MEAN, IN ANOTHER SELLING POINT, I MEAN I'M YOU KNOW WHEN WE DO GET THE COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS, YOU KNOW, THE BUSINESSES I WOULD THINK SHOULD LOOK AT THE FACT THAT WHEN THEY'RE GIVING THEIR MONEY TO THE CITY OF GARLAND, THEY'RE PUTTING THEIR MONEY BACK IN THE CITY, AND IT'S JUST COMING RIGHT BACK AND BENEFITING THEM, AS OPPOSED TO BENEFITING A FOR PROFIT COMPANY THAT ISN'T GIVING THEM ANYTHING IN RETURN.

SO JUST A GREAT PROGRAM. REALLY APPRECIATE WHAT IT DOES TO REDUCE THE TAX BURDEN ON THE CITIZENS AND JUST KEEP UP THAT GOOD WORK. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR.

COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS, YOU'RE WELCOME BACK. THANKS. I'M GLAD YOU'RE BACK. GLAD TO BE BACK, SIR. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. YOU'VE DONE AN EXCELLENT JOB I HAVE NO I HAVE NO NO PROBLEMS WITH ANY OF YOUR PROPOSED RATE INCREASES. THAT'S FIRST THING, BUT MAIN THING IS, I WANT TO PUBLICLY THANK YOU AND JUDGE. BUT YOU AND YOUR YOUR TEAM FOR ADDRESSING SCHOOL. JUST OPEN AND GSD THIS WEEK. AND WE HAD A CONSOLIDATION AMONG MONTCLAIR WITH HEATHER GLENN AND WHICH CREATED A PLETHORA OF PROBLEMS. AND ONE WAS TRASH AND YOU GOT ON IT AND YOU GOT WITH CODE AND I KNOW THAT THERE'S SOME ONGOING EFFORTS TO ADDRESS THAT SITUATION, BUT I WANTED TO THANK YOU FOR SO QUICKLY GETTING ON TOP OF THAT AND TO PROTECT THE STUDENTS FROM THAT, THAT BECAUSE A NUMBER OF STUDENTS WALK DOWN THAT SIDEWALK, I'M NOT GOING TO GIVE THE ADDRESS EVERY DAY. AND I I WAS CONCERNED THAT, YOU KNO, AFTER A WHILE, YOU KNOW, KIDS SHOULD JUST BE KIDS. AND SO THANK YOU FOR STEPPING UP AND ADDRESSING THAT. THANK YOU, SIR. THANK YOU, THANK YOU MAYOR.

THANK YOU SIR. COUNCILMEMBER THOMAS. YES, AERIAL I'M LOOKING AT YOUR JUST LOOKING AT YOUR NUMBERS HERE TRYING TO UNDERSTAND. SO ON SLIDE SIX THERE $307,000 IN NEW SALARIES OVER AND ABOVE. WHAT WHAT ELSE WE HAVE ON SLIDE. IS THAT RIGHT? YES, SIR. ENTERED 7000. AND IF WE IF WE LOOK AT YOUR OTHER SLIDES FOR NEW REVENUES ON SEVEN, NINE AND 11. IS THAT AM I LOOKING THE RIGHT. YEAH. MILLION THREE. THERE ARE 50 THERE AND ANOTHER 700. THAT'S 2.45 MILLION. THAT'S A LITTLE OVER. YEAH. 2.5 MILLION IN NEW REVENUES VERSUS 300,000 IN NEW SALARIESES. IS THAT THE BIGGESTO BRAINER IN THE HISTORY OF CITY BUDGETS, OR AM I MISSING SOMETHING? SO LET ME EXPAND A LITTLE BIT. SO THE WE HAVE THREE PRIMARY EXPENSES THAT ARE DRIVING THIS GREAT INCREASES. NUMBER ONE JUDD TALKED ABOUT THIS. OUR FLEET RATE IS GOING UP FOR THE SANITATION DEPARTMENT IS GOING UP BY $872,000. WE'RE ALSO INCREASING THE TIPPING FEE FOR COMMERCIAL TONNAGE. THAT'S GOING TO GENERATE APPROXIMATELY $1.5 MILLION FOR THE LANDFILL. AND THE LAST THING IS WE'RE ALSO INCREASING OR RESERVE FUND FROM 45 DAYS TO 69 DAYS. THAT IS THE EQUIVALENT OF $1.5 MILLION. AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS THERE'S IT'S JUST A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE WE GET ANOTHER HURRICANE GARLAND. SO WE JUST WANT TO HAVE THE FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR UNFORESEEN EXPENDITURES. SO THOSE ARE THE THREE EXPENSES THAT ARE DRIVING THIS RATE

[03:35:02]

INCREASES, SALARY INCREASES. THAT'S ABOUT $0.40, $0.45 ON THE MONTHLY RATE. HOPE THAT. ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. YEAH, YEAH. IT JUST SEEMS SEEMS LIKE WE'RE GOT A LOT OF NEW REVENUE COMING IN AND NOT A HUGE ASK ON THE EXPENSE SIDE TO ME, IF I'M IF I'M READING IT RIGHT, GUYS, IT SEEMS LIKE IT SEEMS LIKE A GREAT DEAL AND THE AND FOR THE SERVICE WE PROVIDE I MEAN THE WEEKLY WEEKLY SERVICE, THE BULK PICKUP WITHOUT HAVING TO CALL OR ASK OR EVEN LIFT A FINGER. THAT'S JUST UNHEARD OF. AND SOMETHING THAT I KNOW THAT OTHER CITIES GOT TO BE JEALOUS OF. AND SO I THINK THAT'S A THAT'S A WONDERFUL BENEFIT THAT, YOU KNOW, A LOT OF THEM JUST YOU CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT. YOU HAVE TO BEG TO COME GET THAT. I MOVED HERE FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AND YOU WOULD YOU WOULD HAVE TO RENT A DUMPSTER IS NOT CHEAP. AND GOD FORBID THAT YOUR TRASH WAS ONE INCH HIGH ABOVE THE TOP OF THAT DUMPSTER. THEY WOULD MAKE YOU TAKE STUFF OUT OF THERE BEFORE THEY WOULD COME AND GET IT. SO OUR POLICY OF THAT BULK PICKUP, I THINK, REALLY HELPS KEEP THE CITY CLEAN. IT'S A GREAT BENEFIT. AND SO I'M GLAD WE'RE GLAD WE'RE CONTINUING THAT. AND SO I HOPE COUNCIL WILL SUPPORT YOUR ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL SO WE CAN KEEP UP THOSE PROGRAMS. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU MAYOR THANK YOU SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR SANITATION DEPARTMENT? CONTINUE. GREAT JOB. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU SIR. ALL RIGHT COUNCIL, WE'LL MOVE ON

[3. Council discussion and deliberation on FY26 Proposed Budget]

TO OUR LAST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND DELIBERATION ON THE FY 26 PROPOSED BUDGET. ARE THERE ANY OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS OR. COMMENTS HERE? I SEE ALLISON RUNNING BACK UP HERE TO PROVIDE US A LAST MINE SUMMARY, MAYBE A FEW ANSWERS TO SOME OF THE QUESTIONS WE HAD. QUESTIONS WE HAVE TAKEN NOTE OF, ALL THE QUESTIONS THAT WE'VE PROMISED, RESPONSES TO. I BELIEVE THERE IS GOING TO BE SOME PRESENTATION MONDAY NIGHT RELATED TO THE SRO PROGRAM TO ANSWER THAT VERY FIRST CITIZEN QUESTION, AND THEN WE'LL TAKE THE REST OF THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED TODAY AND GET A WRITTEN RESPONSE OUT TO CITY COUNCIL EARLY NEXT WEEK. ARE THERE ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS THAT WE'RE READY TO SUBMIT NOW? DO RIGHT NOW, MAYOR PRO. EXCUSE ME. YES, MAYOR PRO TEM, LOOK, OKAY ON THE SUMMARY THAT YOU PROVIDED TO US ON PAGE THREE SPECIAL EVENTS, WE'VE LOOKED AT THIS BEFORE AND THOUGHT WE WERE KIND OF ON THE SAME PAGE WITH IT, BUT IT SEEMS LIKE THERE'S A HUGE DISPARITY BETWEEN THE AMOUNT WE'RE SPENDING ON SOME EVENTS. AND I REALLY WANT TO SEE THAT LOOKED AT BEFORE WE FINALIZE THIS BUDGET. CHRISTMAS ON THE SQUARE IS HALF OF THE COST OF THE ASIAN FESTIVAL, AND THAT DOES NOT MAKE ANY SENSE TO ME, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU LOOK AT YOU LIKE VISITORS, NUMBER OF VISITORS THAT GO TO THOSE EVENTS. GO AHEAD. AND IF I CAN CLARIFY, THIS IS THE NEW MONEY THAT WE'RE FUNDING AS PART OF THE PROPOSED BUDGET. IT'S NOT CONTEMPLATING THE AMOUNT THAT'S IN THE BASE BUDGET. SO IF THE COUNCIL WILL RECALL FOR THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS, WE'VE HAD TO TREAT OUR KIND OF EXPANSION OF OUR SPECIAL EVENTS AS ONE TIME FUNDED, WHICH THE WAY OUR PROCESS WORKS IS WE BRING THOSE ONE TIME ALLOCATIONS TO THE COUNCIL'S ATTENTION ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. SO WHAT YOU'RE SEEING THERE IS NOT ANY INCREASE TO ANY ONE SPECIAL EVENT OVER WHAT'S IN THE EXISTING BUDGET. IT'S JUST THE INCREASE THAT WE FUNDED, I BELIEVE, FOR THE FIRST TIME IN FY 24 AND HAVE JUST BEEN CARRYING AS ONE TIME. SO THAT'S NOT THE TOTAL BUDGET FOR THOSE EVENTS. IT'S JUST THE PIECE WE KEEP ROLLING FORWARD BECAUSE WE JUST HAVE NOT HAD THE ONGOING FUNDING CAPACITY WE DID PROVIDE.

I THINK A BREAKDOWN OF THE SPECIAL EVENT BUDGETS IN TOTALITY LAST YEAR AS PART OF THE DISCUSSION, AND THOSE STILL REMAIN TO BE THE TOTAL BUDGETS. I'M HAPPY TO RECIRCULATE THAT INFORMATION. I WOULD DEFINITELY CLARIFY. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH. BECAUSE THE WAY IT LOOKS RIGHT NOW, YES. DOES NOT LOOK GOOD. SORRY. I TRIED TO MARK THINGS TO WHERE I COULD JUST ASK PER PAGE ON PAGE NINE. SPONSORSHIPS. WHAT ARE THOSE SPONSORSHIPS? SAYS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR EVENTS THROUGH SPONSORS, SPONSORSHIPS. JUST CURIOUS WHAT THOSE INCLUDE. SO THIS IS A LINE ITEM IN THE RECREATION PERFORMANCE FUND RELATED TO OUR SPECIAL EVENTS. SO OUR SPECIAL EVENTS DEPARTMENT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS TRIES TO SEEK SPONSORSHIP FUNDING. AND SO THEY ARE BUDGETING A REVENUE ASSOCIATED WITH AN ANTICIPATED AMOUNT OF SPONSORSHIP DOLLARS. THIS IS THE EXPENDITURE THAT THEY WILL INCUR TO ENHANCE THE EVENT IF THAT REVENUE COMES THROUGH. SO IF WE DO NOT RECEIVE ANY SPONSORSHIPS FOR OUR EVENTS, THIS LINE ITEM WILL BE REVISED DOWN TO ZERO BECAUSE THEY WILL

[03:40:04]

NOT BE ABLE TO HAVE THE REVENUE TO SUPPORT THAT ADDITIONAL SPEND. OKAY. GOT IT. WILL YOU PROVIDE THE AMOUNT THAT WE RECEIVED IN SPONSORSHIPS LAST YEAR? YES. THANK YOU. PAGE TEN PROGRAM TO RESTRIPE CITY PARKING LOTS. DOES THAT INCLUDE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT? I WILL HAVE TO ASK THE FACILITY. YES, I'VE GOTTEN A THUMBS UP. THANK YOU. ON PAGE 11. EVENT FOR EXHIBIT IN CITY HALL. I PUT YAY BY THAT ONE BECAUSE THIS. THAT'S REALLY EXCITING. WE LEARNED ABOUT THIS EVENT LAST YEAR AT THE MAGIC 11TH STREET PRESENTATION, AND EVERYBODY THAT WAS THERE WAS REALLY EXCITED, AND WE WERE ALL LIKE, HEY JUDE, WE NEED TO DO THIS. WE NEED TO DO THIS. SO I'M REALLY EXCITED TO SEE THAT IN HERE. AND THEN VISIT GARLAND RADIO ADVERTISING ON THAT SAME PAGE. THERE WAS ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR SPECIAL EVENT ADVERTISING. SO I'M, I'M CURIOUS IF MAYBE. SINCE MOST OF THOSE SPECIAL EVENTS HAPPEN DOWNTOWN, IS THAT SOMETHING MAYBE TIFF ONE CAN HELP WITH OR HOT FUNDS? I DON'T KNOW, JUST CURIOUS BECAUSE I THINK THAT INCREASING THAT, THAT REACH THROUGH THE COMMUNITY IS VERY IMPORTANT TO BRING MORE AND MORE PEOPLE IN. IN FACT, I'D LOVE TO SEE MORE SPECIAL EVENTS ANYWAYS, BUT I KNOW THAT THOSE ARE PRETTY DIFFICULT TO DO. SO IF THERE'S ANY WAY TO INCREASE THAT FUNDING FOR ADVERTISEMENT, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT HAPPEN.

HOPEFULLY ONE OF THOSE OTHER SOURCES CAN HELP US WITH THAT. WE DO HAVE VARIOUS BUDGETS. SOME ARE NEW ADDITIONAL, SOME ARE WITHIN OUR BASE BUDGET FOR ADVERTISING. SO WE'LL PULL TOGETHER A COMPREHENSIVE PACKAGE FOR YOU ON THAT. AND THE VARIOUS SOURCES. GREAT. IT'S JUST IMPORTANT TO GET OUR NAME OUT THERE. SO AND THEN THE LAST PAGE. PAGE 12 DOWNTOWN ARTIFICIAL TURF. VERY EXCITED TO SEE THAT WE'RE PUTTING ARTIFICIAL TURF DOWNTOWN I KNOW THAT IT IT IT WAS A WONDERFUL DREAM TO HAVE REAL GRASS BUT I. IT'S HARD TO TAKE CARE OF. IT'S HARD FOR ME TO TAKE CARE OF MY GRASS. AND YOU KNOW, IT'S JUST A LITTLE TINY LAWN. SO I APPRECIATE THAT THAT IS HAPPENING. AND I'M KIND OF EXCITED TO GO PLAY ON IT. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU MA'AM. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS COUNCIL. I DON'T SEE ANY COUNCIL. AS YOU KNOW WE HAVE A CALENDAR FOR THIS BUDGET. ADOPTION WILL BE HOLDING A HEARING THIS COMING WEEK ON OUR TAX RATE AND OUR BUDGET, AND THEN ANOTHER HEARING TO FOLLOW AS WELL WITH AN ADOPTION SOON IN SEPTEMBER. MR. CITY MANAGER, DO YOU HAVE ANY CLOSING WORDS FOR US? NO. JUST AS YOU GO HOME AND OVER THE WEEKEND, IF YOU THINK ABOUT SOMETHING, SEND AN EMAIL AND WE'LL WE'LL BE BACK TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS. COUNCIL, I APPRECIATE ALL YOUR WORK TODAY AND ALL YOUR QUESTIONS. AND WE HAVE SOME WORK TO DO TO READ THROUGH ALL THE MATERIAL PRESENTED TODAY. AND IF YOU HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS, PLEASE SUBMIT THEM. SO AT 104 WE ARE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU. GOOD NIGHT. 32.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.