[ LEGISLATIVE PRAYER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE]
[00:00:11]
FEBRUARY 3RD, 2026 REGULAR MEETING OF THE GARLAND CITY COUNCIL. IT IS THE TRADITION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO HAVE AN INVOCATION AND RECITAL OF THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF OUR MEETING, LED BY ONE OF OUR MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL, WHO WERE INVITED TO PARTICIPATE, IF YOU SO CHOOSE, BUT YOU'RE NOT REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE IN EITHER OR BOTH. YOUR DECISION IS STRICTLY A MATTER OF YOUR OWN CHOICE, AND WILL NOT AFFECT THE DECISIONS TO BE MADE BY MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL IN ANY MANNER. TONIGHT'S INVOCATION AND PLEDGE WILL BE LED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS, SIR. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MAYOR. IF YOU WOULD JOIN ME IN PRAYER, PLEASE. HEAVENLY FATHER, I LIFT UP ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS, COUNCIL MEMBERS AND NATIONAL. PLEASE GRANT US THE GIFT OF WISDOM TO SEE BEYOND THIS PRESENT MOMENT, TO DISCERN WHAT IS TRUE AND RIGHT, TO GUIDE OUR COMMUNITIES TO SAFETY AND PEACE. PROTECT US, GIVE US COURAGE TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT, AND LET US SERVE WITH INTEGRITY AND HUMILITY. IN YOUR HOLY NAME I PRAY. AMEN. AMEN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
GOOD EVENING AGAIN,ARLAND. AND I'M ALWAYS SO HAPPY TO SEE SO MANY PEOPLE HERE IN THE AUDIENCE, ENGAGED IN THEIR COMMUNITY AND ENGAGED IN THE PROCESS THAT WE GO
[ MAYORAL PROCLAMATIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS]
THROUGH HERE. BUT WE HAVE A FEW RECOGNITIONS WE'D LIKE TO DO FIRST. AND PROBABLY THE REAL REASON YOU'RE HERE IS THIS LITTLE GUY OVER HERE CAN COME INTRODUCE HIM FOR US. HELLO, EVERYBODY. MY NAME IS ALBERTO MALDONADO. I'M THE COMMUNITY OUTREACH COORDINATOR HERE FOR THE GARLAND ANIMAL SERVICES, FOR THE GARLAND ANIMAL SHELTER. AND TODAY I HAVE SOMEBODY ACTUALLY VERY, VERY FUN FOR YOU GUYS TO MEET. THIS IS PANCHITO. PANCHITO? HIS NAME. THE WAY THAT HE GOT IT WAS SO FUNNY. SO HE IS A FIVE YEAR OLD AMERICAN STAFFORDSHIRE TERRIER IN THE INDUSTRY. IT'S CALLED STAFFY. AND WHEN WE SAW HIM, WE WERE LIKE, HE'S A LITTLE PUREBRED.AND PANCHITO IN SPANISH MEANS LITTLE BREAD. SO THAT'S WHY HE GOT THE NAME PANCHITO, BECAUSE HE'S A LITTLE PUREBRED. STAFFY. HE CAME INTO OUR SHELTER AT THE SECOND DAY OF THE NEW YEAR.
THEY FOUND HIM SKIPPING SCHOOL AT THE GARLAND HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT, SO HE PICKED THEM UP. HE'S BEEN A GREAT, GREAT BUNDLE OF FUN. WE'VE BEEN HAVING HIM. WE'VE BEEN PLAYING.
IT WAS FUN TO HAVE HIM IN THE SNOW, BECAUSE ONE OF HIS THINGS THAT HE LIKES TO DO IS RUN AROUND AND PLAY TAG. IN REALITY, WHAT IT IS, IS HE'LL GRAB THE BALL, RUN AWAY FROM YOU. WHEN YOU TRY TO GRAB IT, HE'LL LIKE RUN UP TO YOU, NUDGE AND THEN LIKE RUN AWAY. AND THEN HE LOVES TO PLAY TUG OF WAR, SO HE IS A LOAD OF FUN. AND AT 34 POUNDS AT HIS AGE, THAT'S AS BIG AS HE'S GOING TO GET. HE'S NOT GOING TO GET ANY BIGGER. HE'S A GREAT FIRST TIME DOG.
AND ONE OF THE GREAT THINGS ABOUT HIM AS WELL IS, BELIEVE IT OR NOT, HE IS KENNEL TRAINED AND POTTY TRAINED. HE WILL NOT USE THE POTTY IN HIS KENNEL. HE WILL GO OUT IN THE HALLWAY IF HE NEEDS TO, BUT HE ALWAYS WAITS TILL HE MAKES IT OUTSIDE. SO IT'S A REALLY GOOD DOG TO HAVE AS A FIRST TIME TYPE OF DOG. SO RIGHT NOW WHAT WE HAVE, WHAT WE DID LEARN ABOUT HIM IS THAT HE IS HEARTWORM POSITIVE. BUT WITH THE TREATMENT THAT WE HAVE, HE IS GOING TO BE SCHEDULED TO GET THE HEARTWORM TREATMENT. AND WITH THE SUCCESS THAT WE'VE HAD ALL THE DOGS AT ONCE, WE GIVE THEM THE TREATMENT. THEY COME BACK NEGATIVE AFTER SIX MONTHS. SO I'M VERY CONFIDENT THAT ONCE HE IS GIVEN HIS TREATMENT, HE WILL HEAL UP FROM IT AND HE'LL HAVE NO ISSUES, ESPECIALLY IF YOU KEEP HIM ON PREVENTATIVE. WE'RE CURRENTLY PARTICIPATING IN THE GREAT AMERICAN RESCUE BOWL, AND FROM NOW UNTIL THE EIGHTH, ALL ADOPTIONS AT THE SHELTER ARE FREE. BUT BECAUSE PANCHITO IS PET OF THE MONTH FOR THE WHOLE MONTH, HIS ADOPTION WILL BE FREE. SO GUYS, IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN HANGING OUT WITH A REALLY FUN LITTLE GUY, PLEASE COME VISIT US AT THE SHELTER AT 1902 STATE HIGHWAY 66. WE'RE OPEN EVERY DAY BUT WEDNESDAY FROM 11 TO 6, AND WE'LL PUT PANCHITO RIGHT IN THE FRONT IN THE CRITTER CORNER SO EVERYONE
[00:05:05]
CAN SEE HIM. IF YOU GUYS WANT TO CHECK HIM OUT. SO PLEASE, GUYS, COME, COME SEE US. COME SEE ALL THE GREAT THINGS THAT WE HAVE. AND WE HAVE MICROCHIP CLINICS AND LOW COST VACCINE CLINICS EVERY WEDNESDAY. PLEASE CHECK US OUT ON OUR FACEBOOK TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THAT. THANK YOU.THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SO HOPEFULLY IT WON'T TAKE ALL MONTH TO HAVE PANCHITO FIND HIS FOREVER HOME. YEP. WE HAVE ANOTHER GREAT RECOGNITION. THIS IS FOR THE TOURISM FRIENDLY TEXAS DESIGNATION. SO I ASK THEM TO COME ON UP HERE. IT'S MY PLEASURE TO WELCOME MADDIE PHILLIPS FROM TRAVEL TEXAS, PART OF THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF TEXAS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM. MADDIE SERVES AS A COOPERATIVE ADVERTISING SPECIALIST AND WORKS CLOSELY WITH COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE STATE TO PROMOTE TOURISM AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. WE ARE HONORED TO HAVE HER HERE TODAY WITH US TO FORMALLY RECOGNIZE GARLAND AS A TOURISM FRIENDLY, TEXAS CERTIFIED COMMUNITY. IT'S AN ACHIEVEMENT THAT WE EARNED THIS PAST OCTOBER, AND THIS DESIGNATION REFLECTS GARLAND'S STRONG COMMITMENT TO HOSPITALITY, CULTURAL VIBRANCY, AND CREATING WELCOMING EXPERIENCES FOR VISITORS AND RESIDENTS ALIKE. WE APPRECIATE TRAVEL, TEXAS PARTNERSHIP AND SUPPORT, AND WE ARE GRATEFUL FOR MADDIE FOR BEING HERE. THIS RECOGNITION. SO TO WELCOME YOU UP. THANK YOU. WELL, PANCHITO, THANKS FOR NOTHING. THAT'S A HARD ACT TO FOLLOW. I'D LIKE TO SAY SEVERAL WORDS I SAY. SAYING A FEW WORDS SETS UNHEALTHY EXPECTATIONS. SO I JUST LIKE TO HAVE A COUPLE OF WORDS HERE TO RECOGNIZE THIS ACHIEVEMENT HERE TONIGHT. FIRST AND FOREMOST, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR HAVING ME HERE IN GARLAND. IT'S BEEN A FEW YEARS SINCE I'VE BEEN IN TOWN AND IT HAS CHANGED TREMENDOUSLY. I'VE HAD THE PRIVILEGE OF GETTING A LITTLE TOUR AROUND DOWNTOWN THIS EVENING, AND IT'S REALLY WONDERFUL TO SEE ALL THE HARD WORK THAT THE CITY AND THIS COMMUNITY HAS DONE ON BEHALF OF GARLAND, AND I'M JUST REALLY EXCITED TO BE ABLE TO PRESENT THIS HONOR TODAY. THAT'S MY NOTES HERE. THANK YOU FOR WELCOMING ME HERE TONIGHT.
TONIGHT, I'M HONORED TO OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZE THE CITY OF GARLAND AS A TOURISM FRIENDLY, CERTIFIED COMMUNITY, WITH GARLAND COMPLETING THE CERTIFICATION ON BEHALF OF THE CITY IN 2025. THIS DESIGNATION REPRESENTS COLLABORATION, THOUGHTFUL PLANNING, AND A SHARED UNDERSTANDING THAT TOURISM IS NOT JUST ABOUT ATTRACTING VISITORS. IT'S ABOUT STRENGTHENING THE COMMUNITY. FOR EVERYONE WHO CALLS GARLAND HOME TOURISM PLAYS A SIGNIFICANT ROLE E IN GARLAND'S ECONOMY. IN 2024, VISITORS GENERATED $350 MILLION IN DIRECT TRAVEL SPEND, PRODUCING APPROXIMATELY $30 MILLION IN LOCAL TAX REVENUE THAT SUPPORTS CITY SERVICES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY PRIORITIES. VISITOR SPENDING ALSO HELPS SAVE EACH HOUSEHOLD. IN DALLAS COUNTY, AN AVERAGE OF $1,328 IN TAXES EVERY YEAR. A CLEAR EXAMPLE OF HOW TOURISM WORKS ON BEHALF OF ITS RESIDENTS. GARLAND'S STRENGTH LIES IN ITS AUTHENTICITY. FROM DOWNTOWN GARLAND SQUARE AND THE BANKHEAD CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT TO FIREWHEEL GOLF PARK, LAKE RAY HUBBARD AND THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF SPRING CREEK AND ROWLETT CREEK PRESERVE, GARLAND OFFERS EXPERIENCES ROOTED IN CULTURE, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY. THE BANKHEAD CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT CERTIFICATION FROM THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON THE ARTS FURTHER REINFORCES GARLAND'S COMMITMENT TO ARTS, CULTURE, AND CREATIVE PLACEMAKING. SIGNATURE EVENTS SUCH AS CHRISTMAS ON THE SQUARE, MUSIC MADE HERE CONCERT SERIES, AND THE ASIAN AMERICAN HERITAGE FESTIVAL BRING PEOPLE TOGETHER AND SHOWCASE GARLAND'S DIVERSITY AND LOCAL PRIDE. ADD TO THAT GARLAND'S DESIGNATION AS THE COWBOY HAT CAPITAL OF TEXAS. IT'S ONE OF OUR FAVORITES IN THE OFFICE AND ITS LISTING ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES.
IT'S CLEAR WHY GARLAND HOLDS A UNIQUE AND IMPORTANT PLACE IN THE DFW METROPLEX. GARLAND CONTINUES TO LOOK TOWARDS THE FUTURE. THE CITY IS PREPARING FOR THE GLOBAL ATTENTION THAT'S COMING THIS SUMMER. WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT, THERE'S GOING TO BE A BUNCH OF GERMANS WANDERING AROUND THE STREETS FOR AROUND FIFA WORLD CUP, WORKING IN COORDINATION WITH THE DALLAS SPORTS COMMISSION TO CAPTURE THE BENEFITS OF THOSE INTERNATIONAL VISITORS. AT THE SAME TIME, GARLAND IS ADVANCING A DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN AS THE TEAM SHARED WITH US, WHICH WE'RE REALLY EXCITED TO SEE THE NEXT PHASE OF POTENTIALLY A NEW TENNIS CENTER TO HOST NATIONAL TOURNAMENTS, AND DEVELOPING A METRO SOCCER COMPLEX DESIGNED TO DRIVE TOURNAMENT VISITATION AND LONG TERM ECONOMIC IMPACT. PUTTING ON TOPIC, SPORTS TOURISM THIS YEAR IS VERY STRONG HERE IN AMERICA, AND IT'S REALLY GREAT TO SEE YOU GUYS TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ALL THOSE RESOURCES AND THE INCOME THAT COMES WITH THAT. THESE EFFORTS POSITION GARLAND FOR CONTINUED GROWTH AND REINFORCE TOURISM AS A CATALYST FOR COMMUNITY INVESTMENT. THIS ACHIEVEMENT WOULD HAVE NOT BEEN POSSIBLE WITHOUT STRONG LEADERSHIP AND BROAD COMMUNITY SUPPORT. THANK YOU TO MAYOR DYLAN HEDRICK, CHRIS BEARD, AND A CONSUMMATE
[00:10:06]
SUPPORTER OF THE CVB AND A STRONG REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE CITY OF GARLAND AND THE GARLAND CITY COUNCIL. FOR YOUR CONTINUED LEADERSHIP AND COMMITMENT TO TOURISM AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. I'VE SEEN TIME AND TIME AGAIN, ONE OF THE BIGGEST REASOSONSHAT TOURISM IS SUPPORTED IN A COMMUNITY IS BECAUSE IT'S CITY LEADERSHIP UNDERSTANDS ITS VALUE TO NOT ONLY ECONOMIC BENEFITS, BUT COMMUNITY, THE RESIDENTS QUALITY OF LIFE. WE ALSO APPRECIATE THE PARTNERS WHO HELPED SUBMIT LETTERS OF SUPPORT, WHICH ARE A REQUIREMENT OF THE CERTIFICATION AND HELP DEMONSTRATE GARLAND'S WELCOMING SPIRIT AT TEX MED KITCHEN, HYATT PLACE AND STATE REPRESENTATIVE RHETTA ANDREWS BOWERS CELEBRATING THE TEAM. AT THE HEART OF THIS ACHIEVEMENT IS THE DEDICATED TEAM AT GARLAND SPECIAL RECOGNITION TO LACY CHAPMAN, WHO HEADED UP THE EFFORTS TO GET THE CERTIFICATION. DANA LODGE, THE CVB AND EVENTS DIRECTOR. VERONICA MALDONADO, MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER KARINA BARRA, THE SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGER, AS WELL AS THE ENTIRE VISITOR CENTER TEAM AND EVERYBODY THAT HELPED SUPPORT THE VISIT GARLAND TEAM. ALONG WITH THE ENTIRE GARLAND TEAM. YOU ARE THE STEWARDS OF GARLAND'S STORY. YOUR WORK PRESERVES WHAT MAKES GARLAND AUTHENTIC WHILE CONTINUING TO ELEVATE THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE.YOU SERVE AS AMBASSADORS NOT ONLY TO VISITORS, BUT TO THE COMMUNITY ITSELF, REFLECTING HOSPITALITY, PRIDE AND PROFESSIONALISM EVERY DAY. AND JUST SO YOU GUYS KNOW, IN OUR INDUSTRY, YOUR TEAM IN PARTICULAR WINS ALL THE AWARDS OR A LOT OF THEM, AND HAS BEEN A GREAT MENTOR TO SO MANY YOUNG PROFESSIONALS IN THE INDUSTRY. I MYSELF, NEW TO THE INDUSTRY, REALLY LEANED ON SEVERAL OF YOUR TEAM MEMBERS. SO I'D JUST LIKE TO LET YOU KNOW THAT THEY ARE BEYOND JUST SORT OF THE DAY TO DAY JOB. THEY REALLY ARE LEADERS IN OUR INDUSTRY HERE IN THE STATE OF TEXAS. SO FINALLY, ON BEHALF OF TRAVEL TEXAS AND THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING SUCH A STRONG PARTNER TO US HERE AT THE STATE FOR HELPING PROMOTE TEXAS TO THE WIDER WORLD. CONGRATULATIONS AGAIN TO THE CITY OF GARLAND AND VISIT GARLAND AS ON ACHIEVING TOURISM FRIENDLY CERTIFICATION. WE CONTINUE TO LOOK FORWARD, WE CONTINUING THIS PARTNERSHIP AND TO SEE HOW GARLAND'S TOURISM STORY CONTINUES TO GROW THROUGHOUT THE REST OF 2026 AND BEYOND. THANK YOU SO MUCH AND GOOD EVENING. TO YOU. ALL. WE'RE. WOULD YOU LIKE TO. WELL, WE'RE DEFINITELY THRILLED. WE KNEW THAT GARLAND HAD ALL THE AMENITIES. WE JUST NEEDED TO TELL THE WORLD ABOUT IT. AND IT REALLY BECAME CLEAR AFTER 11 MONTHS OF THE VISITOR CENTER BEING OPENED, THAT WE SAW VISITORS FROM ALL 50 STATES AND 17 COUNTRIES THAT CAME INTO THE VISITOR CENTER JUST SHY OF ONE YEAR, AND IT'S JUST GROWN EXPONENTIALLY SINCE THEN. SO CONGRATS TO MY TEAM. THEY REALLY DID ALL THE WORK TO GET THIS DESIGNATION. I JUST GET TO TALK TONIGHT. SO THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH. AND WE ON COUNCIL, WE COULDN'T DO IT WITHOUT OUR STAFF. OUR STAFF IS FABULOUS FOR PUTTING THAT TOGETHER. AND MADDIE, I HOPE YOU GET A COPY OF GARLAND FROM OUR VISITOR CENTER BEFORE YOU LEAVE. SO MAKE SURE YOU GET THAT. FOR THE TAMALE TRAIL WAS EXCELLENT. YES, YOU NEED TO TRY THE FAUX TRAIL NEXT.
[ CONSENT AGENDA]
RIGHT. NOW ON TO OUR ORDER OF BUSINESS HERE. THE FIRST ITEM IS OUR CONSENT AGENDA. ALL ITEMS UNDER THIS SECTION ARE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY A SINGLE MOTION OF COUNCIL WITHOUT DISCUSSION. COUNCIL HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW EACH OF THESE ITEMS AT A PREVIOUS WORK SESSION, AND APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AUTHORIZES THE CITY MANAGER OR[00:15:02]
HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE EACH ITEM. I WILL ANNOUNCE THE CONSENT AGENDA AND PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE COUNCIL, AS WELL AS MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE, TO REQUEST THAT ANY ITEM BE REMOVED AND CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. AND WE ALREADY ARE PULLING ITEM NUMBER SIX FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. FIRST ITEM ON OUR CONSENT AGENDA IS APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 10TH, 2026 SPECIAL SIP WORK SESSION. ITEM NUMBER TWO IS APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 20TH, 2026 REGULAR MEETING. ITEM NUMBER THREE IS APPROVE THE FOLLOWING BIDS THREE A TRAFFIC SIGNAL. INSTALLATION AND MODERNIZATION THREE B, G, P, AND L KING MOUNTAIN TO GRAND FALLS. TRANSMISSION 345 KV LINE STEEL STRUCTURES THREE C, G, P AND L SUBSTATION CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CONTRACT 3D AMBERWOOD DRIVE AND SUGARBERRY LANE.PAVING WATER, WASTEWATER AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS THREE E SOCCER ACADEMY ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES. CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 13F, G, P AND L CENTERVILLE TO OATS ROAD TRANSMISSION LINE STEEL STRUCTURES. ITEM NUMBER FOUR IS. PUBLIC HEARING WAS PREVIOUSLY CONDUCTED FOR THE ITEM AND INSTRUCTED STAFF TO BRING FORTH THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE FOR A IS CLEANUP AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3204. ITEM NUMBER FIVE IS CALLING THE 2026 GENERAL ELECTION FOR MAY 2ND. ITEM NUMBER SIX HAS BEEN PULLED, AND ITEM NUMBER SEVEN IS ABANDONMENT OF A SLOPE EASEMENT IN THE PROPOSED OVERLOOK SUBDIVISION. COUNSEL, IS THERE ANY OTHER ITEMS THAT YOU WISH TO HAVE PULLED AND CONSIDERED SEPARATELY? IS THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO PULL AN ITEM? HAVE IT CONSIDERED SEPARATELY? SEE NONE.
COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS SIR. MR. MAYOR, A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEM NUMBER SIX BY COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS, A SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER BASS. DISCUSSION. MADAM SECRETARY, PLEASE PREPARE THE VOTE FOR US. AND THAT ITEMS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM
[6. Calling the 2026 Special Home-Rule Election for May 2, 2026]
NUMBER SIX, CALLING FOR THE 2026 SPECIAL HOME RULE ELECTION FOR MAY 2ND, 2026. I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND READ THE. SPEAKER OR ASK MADAM SECRETARY IF YOU'D READ THE SPEAKER GUIDELINES FOR US. YES, SIR. THANK YOU. MAYOR. THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK IS GIVEN TO PROVIDE TESTIMONY RATHER THAN TO QUESTION THE CITY COUNCIL OR STAFF. THE CHAIR MAY CALL A SPEAKER OUT OF ORDER IF THE SPEAKER PRESENTS QUESTIONS, OR PRESENTS QUESTIONS OR REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION THAT WILL UNDULY DELAY THE TRANSACTION OF BUSINESS AT THE MEETING, SPEAKERS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO SPEAK ON A FIRST COME, FIRST SERVE BASIS, AS DETERMINED BY THE ORDER IN WHICH THE CITY SECRETARY RECEIVES THE SPEAKER'S INFORMATION.APPLICANTS ARE ALLOWED TEN MINUTES FOR PRESENTATIONS, AND ALL OTHER SPEAKERS WILL BE ALLOWED THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. WHEN THE PODIUM BUZZER SOUNDS, THE SPEAKER MUST END THEIR COMMENTS. IF ANYONE WISHES TO SPEAK AND HASN'T YET FILLED OUT A SPEAKER CARD, PLEASE DO SO OVER DOWN BY THE CITY SECRETARY. AND I'M GOING TO ASK THE CITY SECRETARY. I KNOW WE HAVE A LOT OF SPEAKERS TONIGHT. SHE'LL READ THE FIRST NAME AND HAVE AN ON DECK, THE SECOND NAME, IF YOU WOULD PLEASE COME UP AND JUST STAND OVER ON THE SIDE AND BE READY FOR WHEN YOUR NAME IS CALLED TO SPEAK. SO DO WE HAVE ANY PRESENTATION ON THIS ITEM? NO PRESENTATION. VERY GOOD. AND, MADAM SECRETARY, GO AHEAD. AND IF YOU COULD CALL THE FIRST SPEAKER ON THIS ITEM, SONNY LIN.
AND ON DECK WE HAVE AMANDA LANCIONI. IF YOU'D GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. MY NAME IS LYNN. I LIVE IN 1442 MORRISON COURT 75040 DISTRICT TWO. I BELIEVE EACH RESIDENT HAS THE RIGHT IN TO MAKE AN INFORMED, PERSONAL, PURPOSEFUL CHOICE TO SUBSCRIBE AND BE CHARGED FOR ANY SERVICE THAT IS PAID FOR THROUGH THE CITY'S BILL. I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THE CONTRACT THAT HAS BEEN NEGOTIATED WITH THE HEALTH TELEHEALTH COMPANY IS IN THAT CATEGORY. I BELIEVE THAT THERE ARE SOME PEOPLE I MEAN, THERE ARE RESIDENTS THAT DON'T EVEN KNOW THIS IS HAPPENING. AND I THINK THAT. IF THEY EVER FOUND OUT OR FOUND A CHARGE ON THEIR CITY BILL THAT THEY DID NOT AUTHORIZE, THEY WOULD BE
[00:20:05]
CALLING THE CITY UTILITIES COMMISSION DEPARTMENT AND LETTING THEM KNOW ABOUT IT. I SOME PEOPLE MAY THINK THERE ARE UNDER THE TABLE PAYMENTS ARRANGED WITH THIS COMPANY, OR THAT THE CITY WILL BENEFIT MONETARILY IN SOME WAY. THAT IS NOT THE IMPRESSION I WANT OUR CITIZENS TO HAVE ABOUT GARLAND. I AM AGAINST ANY OPT OUT CONTRACT BEING CONSIDERED BY THE CITY WITH ANY COMPANY NOW OR IN THE FUTURE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MADAM. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKERS? AMANDA LANCIONI. AND ON DECK WE HAVE JOHN L BOLES. GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. YES. MY NAME IS AMANDA AND I LIVE AT TWO, TWO, SIX WILLOW CREST DRIVE HERE IN GARLAND. AND I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU, COUNCIL, FOR ALLOWING ME TO SHARE WITH YOU THIS EVENING. I WANTED TO ASK YOU TONIGHT TO ALLOW THIS END PATHWAYS DECISION TO COME TO THE VOTERS. I WANT TO FIRST SAY THAT I DO BELIEVE THE INTENTION AND HEART THAT YOU ALL HAVE TO TAKE CARE OF. THE RESIDENTS OF GARLAND IS NOT LOST ON ME. I CARE DEEPLY ABOUT THE PEOPLE TOO, ESPECIALLY THE UNINSURED. AND SO I DO WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THAT. THERE'S NO DOUBT THAT HEALTH CARE HAS BECOME INCREASINGLY DIFFICULT TO OBTAIN AND IS NOT AFFORDABLE FOR MANY, AND I WISH I HAD TIME TO GO INTO THAT, BUT I DON'T. THE BOTTOM LINE FOR ME IS THAT A COST, A TARIFF, A TAX, WHATEVER WE WANT TO CALL IT WILL BE ON EVERY UTILITY BILL IN OUR CITY, AND I FEEL LIKE IT SHOULD BE VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS. I'M A WOMAN WHO'S THANKFUL THAT I HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE, AND THAT'S NOT LOST ON ME EITHER. WHAT OTHER PEOPLE HAVE PAID TO MAKE THAT POSSIBLE.AND I BELIEVE THAT EVERY CITIZEN, ASSUMING THEY AREN'T A FELON OR UNDERAGE, THAT THEY'VE REGISTERED TO VOTE, SHOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO ON MATTERS THAT REGARD. THINGS LIKE THAT AFFECT EVERY CITIZEN IN OUR CITY. EVERY CITIZEN IS GOING TO HAVE TO TOUCH THIS IN SOME WAY, EITHER TO IF THEY CHOOSE TO OPT OUT OR IF THEY CHOOSE TO PAY FOR IT. AND I JUST BELIEVE THAT THE CITIZENS DESERVE TO HAVE THEIR VOICE HEARD. PERIOD. THE PROGRAM IS BEING PAID FOR IN A WAY THAT EACH ONE OF US, THE CITIZENS, SHOULD HAVE INPUT INTO. THIS DECISION FELT HONESTLY PRETTY RUSHED THROUGH WITH LITTLE CITIZEN INPUT, AND I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SEE ALL THE OPTIONS OUT THERE, YOU KNOW, LOOKED UPON. TELEHEALTH ISN'T GOING TO HELP THE BIG PICTURE ISSUE OF HEALTH INSURANCE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, BUT I THINK TOGETHER WE CAN FIND SOMETHING BETTER THAN THAN A $6 AND THEN UP TO A $9 COST ON OUR UTILITY BILL. AND SO I JUST REALLY DO ASK YOU TONIGHT TO CONSIDER PUTTING THIS BEFORE, BEFORE ALL OF US CITIZENS AND ALLOWING US TO TELL YOU, I KNOW CITIZENS, I KNOW THAT VOTER TURNOUT COULD BE LOW, BUT TO ME THAT'S IRRELEVANT. WE ALL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME OUT IF WE SO WISH TO LET OUR VOICE BE HEARD. SO THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. MA'AM. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, JOHN L BOWLES. AND UP ON DECK WE HAVE SHARON MORGAN. NAME AND ADDRESS.
FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. HELLO, MY NAME IS JOHN BOWLES. I'VE BEEN A RESIDENT OF GARLAND PRETTY MUCH MY ENTIRE LIFE, AND THE ONLY TIME I WASN'T HERE WAS WHENEVER I WAS IN THE MILITARY. AND THIS WAS IN COLLEGE, AND THIS WAS MY HOME OF RECORD. I ONLY I HAVEN'T HEARD MUCH ABOUT THIS UNTIL LIKE THE LAST FEW DAYS, I HEARD THAT THE TELEHEALTH WENT THROUGH, AND I GOT TALKED TO BY A BUNCH OF ANGRY PEOPLE ABOUT IT. AND AND THEN I FOUND OUT ABOUT THAT IT COULD COME UP FOR A VOTE. SO I DECIDED TO COME HERE AND TALK ABOUT IT. AND HONESTLY, I THINK IT'S A NO BRAINER. I MEAN, ANY IN IF IT'S GOING TO BE PUT ON ON THE BILL FOR ALL OF US IN GARLAND, THEN WE SHOULD VOTE ON IT. IT AGAIN SEEMS LIKE A NO BRAINER IF IT'S GOING TO BE PUT ON, ESPECIALLY ON A UTILITY BILL THAT MOST PEOPLE AREN'T GOING TO PAY ATTENTION TO. WE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT. WE SHOULD VOTE ON IT. AND AND EVEN MORE THAN THAT, THE FACT THAT, YOU KNOW, IT SEEMS LIKE WHAT OTHER OPTIONS ARE OUT THERE? I MEAN, THAT'S A VALID QUESTION. WE SHOULD LOOK AT ALL THE OTHER OPTIONS OUT THERE FOR GOING TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS. AND IT DEFINITELY SHOULD NOT BE ANYONE THAT POTENTIALLY COULD GO BANKRUPT.
IF THEY DON'T GET THIS CONTRACT. WE SHOULD WE SHOULD LOOK AT THEIR THEIR FINANCIAL SOLUBILITY. WE SHOULD LOOK AT HOW THEIR HISTORY. WE SHOULD LOOK AT WHETHER THEY CAN
[00:25:03]
ACTUALLY TAKE THIS ON WITHOUT POTENTIALLY HAVING MORE COSTS DOWN THE ROAD. I MEAN, WE SEE HOW THE TOLL ROAD WENT WHERE IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE, NOT A TOLL ROAD ANYMORE, BUT YET IT WAS A TOLL ROAD. TOLL ROAD STILL WITH THE STATE OF TEXAS. WHY SHOULD WE DO REPEAT THAT HERE? WHY SHOULD WE REPEAT SOMETHING WITH THE LIKE WITH THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, WHERE IT ENDED UP BEING A BASICALLY A FINE? WHY SHOULD WHY SHOULD WE DO THAT HERE IN GARLAND? WE'RE A NONPARTISAN CITY, AND WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BE LOOKING OUT FOR THE GOOD OF ALL THE RESIDENTS.AND I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF YOU IN THE CITY COUNCIL HAVE THE BEST INTEREST OF GARLANDND IN YOUR HEART. AND I BELIEVE THAT THE BEST WAY TO PROVE THAT IS TO PUT IT TO A VOTE FOR ALL OF US TO DECIDE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. SIR. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, SHARON MORGAN, ON DECK, NANCY CLARK. YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS? FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. SHARON MORGAN AND I LIVE AT 509 PRESTWICK CIRCLE HERE IN GARLAND. I'M HERE TO COMMENT AND SAY THAT I'M IN FAVOR OF PUTTING THIS ON THE BALLOT FOR US TO VOTE FOR. I HAVE I'M LATE TO THE GAME. I WHEN I FOUND OUT ABOUT THIS WHOLE THING, I WAS SHOCKED. I COULDN'T BELIEVE THAT THE CITY ENROLLED ME IN A PROGRAM WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT, WHETHER I WANTED IT OR NOT. AND ADDITIONALLY, THERE WASN'T ANY COMPETITIVE BIDDING.
AND YOU PICKED A PROVIDER WITH AN OPT OUT MODEL VERSUS AN OPT IN MODEL. BY THE WAY, I'VE SEEN ON FACEBOOK THAT IT CAN TAKE 2 TO 3 TRIES TO OPT OUT BEFORE ONE GETS A REPLY BACK. SO I GUESS I HAVE 1 OR 2 MORE TRIES BEFORE I CAN EXPECT A REPLY. SO OPTING OUT IS NOT GOING TO BE EASY. I UNDERSTAND THAT PUTTING THIS TO THE CITIZENS TO DECIDE THAT MD HEALTH PATHWAYS IS POTENTIALLY GOING TO CANCEL THEIR CONTRACT IF THERE IS A VOTE, AND MAYBE THAT'S A GOOD THING. IN ORDER TO START THIS WHOLE THING OVER AGAIN, HAVING A BUSINESS MODEL THAT RELIES ON OPTING OUT IS LIKE SOMEONE PULLING A $10 BILL FROM MY BACKPACK WHILE I'M TRYING TO EAT MY LUNCH. NO ONE'S GOING TO NOTICE, BUT IT SHOULD BE A CONCERN OF EVERYONE. I WATCHED A PORTION OF THE WORK SESSION, AND I AGREE WITH MAYOR HEDRICK'S STATEMENTS FROM THE WORK SESSION, AND I DISAGREE WITH MR. BASS, MY COUNCILMAN, AND OTHERS. IT SEEMS LIKE THERE WAS A RUSH TO JUMP INTO ALL THIS AND THEN TO HERE. LET'S PAUSE ON A VOTE WAS VERY DISAPPOINTING. RESPECTFULLY, I THINK THAT THE COUNCIL NEEDS TO PUT THIS TO A VOTE WHERE IT BELONGS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MA'AM. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER? NANCY, CLICK IN ON DECK. JESSICA LOCKLEAR. HI, NANCY ON ROYAL CRESCENT.
GARLAND. I'VE BEEN UP HERE A COUPLE TIMES, AND I STILL HAVE QUESTIONS. FIRST OF ALL, I DO BELIEVE IT SHOULD BE UP TO THE VOTERS TO VOTE THIS IN OR TO VOTED OUT. THAT IS OUR RIGHT.
AND TO JUST PUSH SOMETHING ON US ON A CHARGE, ON OUR UTILITY BILL, I BELIEVE IS WRONG. AND IN OTHER THINGS I'VE READ IN OTHER STATES OR TOWNS THAT HAVE TRIED TO DO THAT, IT WAS VOTED DOWN BECAUSE IT WAS WRONG. THE ONE QUESTION I HAVE. WE HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT OPT OUT. WELL, I'VE BEEN DOING A LITTLE RESEARCH, AND FERRIS AND HENDERSON, WHICH THEY TAKE CARE OF. THOSE ARE OPT IN. THEY'RE NOT OPT OUT. THEY'RE OPT IN. NOW FERRIS PAYS FOR THE WHOLE BILL, AND ONLY 70% OF THE PEOPLE HAVE OPT IN, BUT THEY PAY FOR THE WHOLE BILL. BUT IT IS AN OPT IN. HENDERSON IS AN OPT IN OF $5 A MONTH. WHY CAN'T THAT BE FOR US? YOU KNOW, THAT WAS PART OF THE ISSUE HERE.
WE DON'T WANT TO BE PUSHED. SOMETHING PUSHED ON US. AND THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE DOING. THE OTHER QUESTION I HAVE, I TRIED TO LOOK, I COULDN'T FIND IT ANYWHERE. AND MAYBE SOMEBODY CAN DIRECT ME TO WHERE TO LOOK. I'M HOPING YOU ALL DID SOME KIND OF A COST STUDY ON WHAT THIS REALLY IS GOING TO COST THE CITY OF GARLAND. YOU HAVE THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT GOING TO TAKE CALLS. WELL, A SERVICE REP CAN TAKE 30 TO 60 CALLS A DAY IF THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, NOT DETAILED AND FROM FROM PATHWAYS. WE'RE GOING TO NEED TO HAVE SERVICE REPS THAT CAN SPEAK VIETNAMESE, ENGLISH AND HISPANIC. HAS THAT BEEN ADDRESSED AND HOW MANY SERVICE REPS ARE YOU GOING TO NEED? YOU HAVE TO EMPLOY THEM, PAY THEM, TRAIN THEM. MINIMUM 20,000 A YEAR. AND THAT'S NOT COUNTING YOUR INSURANCE FOR THEM, YOU KNOW, WHERE IS THAT THOSE FUNDS COMING FROM? THEY'RE GOING TO TAKE CARE OF IT FOR SIX MONTHS. BUT AFTER THAT, THE CITY HAS TO TAKE CARE OF THAT. AND IF WE HAVE 85,000 RESIDENTS OR 85,000 HOUSEHOLDS, IT'S NOT ONE
[00:30:07]
SERVICE REP. YOU'RE GOING TO NEED TO FILL THESE CALLS. YOU'RE LOOKING AT THREE, MAYBE EVEN FOUR. THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY. THANK YOU. MA'AM. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, JESSICA LOCKLEAR, ON DECK? WE HAVE SUMMER WASSEF AND PAUL DUBROW WOULD LIKE TO GIVE HIS THREE MINUTES TO SUMMER WASSEF. YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. MY NAME IS JESSICA LOCKLEAR. I LIVE AT 806 WINIFRED HAMLIN GARLAND 75 041. THAT'S IN DISTRICT FIVE. I WANT TO THANK YOU, MAYOR HEDRICK AND THE MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL, FOR ALLOWING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH YOU TONIGHT. FIRST, I WANT TO SINCERELY PRAISE YOU ALL FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO LISTEN TO THE VOICES OF YOUR CONSTITUENTS. YOU'VE SHOWN TREMENDOUS COURAGE BY RECONSIDERING YOUR PREVIOUS DECISION TO APPROVE THIS AGREEMENT WITH MD PATHWAYS AND THEIR TELEHEALTH PROGRAM, BRINGING THIS BACK UP FOR DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERING WHETHER IT SHOULD GO TO A VOTE OF THE PEOPLE IS THE MARK OF A TRUE SERVANT LEADER. THE HUMILITY TO CHANGE COURSE WHEN NEW INFORMATION COMES TO LIGHT, WHEN CONSTITUENTS SPEAK CLEARLY, AND WHEN COMMUNITY CONCERNS DEMAND A FRESH LOOK,HAT IS THE KIND OF LEADERSHIP THAT IS RARE AND DEEPLY APPRECIATED.THIS PROGRAM AUTOMATICALLY ENROLLS EVERY HOUSEHOLD WITHOUT OUR PRIOR CONSENT TO AN ESCALATING FEE SYSTEM QUIETLY TUCKED INTO OUR CITY. UTILITY STATEMENTS MD PATHWAYS THEMSELVES HAVE STATED THAT THIS IS THE ONLY WAY THEIR COMPANY CAN SUCCEED. THE ONLY BUSINESS MODEL CAPABLE OF WORKING IS AN OPT OUT SYSTEM. IT CANNOT STAND ON ITS OWN LEGS AS AN OPT IN SYSTEM. IN OTHER WORDS, THEY ONLY MAKE MONEY IF THE MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS NEVER NOTICE, NEVER OBJECT, AND SIMPLY PAY UP. BUT NOW, FACED WITH THE POSSIBILITY THAT THE CITIZENS OF GARLAND MIGHT NOW BE INFORMED AND HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE ON THAT INFORMATION, MD PATHWAYS HAS THREATENED TO CANCEL THE CONTRACT ENTIRELY. ANY BUSINESS THAT CAN ONLY THRIVE IN THE SHADOWS, THAT FEARS THE FULL LIGHT OF DEMOCRATIC SCRUTINY, THAT WARNS IT WILL WALK AWAY RATHER THAN LET PEOPLE DECIDE, IS REVEALING ITS TRUE NATURE. A PROGRAM THAT TRULY BENEFITS OUR COMMUNITY SHOULDN'T NEED TO HIDE BEHIND AN AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT AND ESCALATING HIDDEN CHARGES. IT SHOULD NOT CRUMBLE AT THE THOUGHT OF RESIDENTS HAVING KNOWLEDGE AND A VOICE. THIS IS NOT ABOUT TELEHEALTH. IT'S ABOUT DEMOCRACY. IT'S ABOUT FREEDOM. IT'S ABOUT INFORMED CONSENT, THE BEDROCK PRINCIPLE THAT NO ONE SHOULD BE ENROLLED IN A THIRD PARTY FOR PROFIT SERVICE CHARGED BY A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY WITHOUT KNOWINGLY AGREEING TO IT. WE TEACH OUR CHILDREN THAT TRUE INFORMED CONSENT MEANS AN EMPHATIC YES, NOT SILENCE, NOT IGNORANT COMPLIANCE, NOT FORGETTING TO OPT OUT. WHY SHOULD WE ACCEPT LESS FROM A CORPORATION THAT WANTS TO PARTNER WITH OUR GREAT CITY? I URGE YOU TONIGHT, PLEASE STAND BY THE PRINCIPLES THAT HAVE MADE GARLAND STRONG.
LET THE PEOPLE VOTE. BRING THIS ON THE MAY BALLOT. LET EVERY RESIDENT DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES IF THEY WANT THIS PROGRAM AND UNDER WHAT TERMS. TONIGHT, I ASK YOU TO SHOW GARLAND AND THE REST OF TEXAS, BECAUSE THIS IS JUST THEY'VE SAID GARLAND IS THE START. IF IT DOESN'T GO HERE, THEIR COMPANY CAN'T SUCCEED. TEXAS IS WATCHING. LET THEM KNOW THAT OUR LEADERS CHOOSE DEMOCRACY OVER PROFIT, CONSENT OVER COERCION, AND THAT THE PEOPLE'S VOICE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN A GREEDY CORPORATIONS ULTIMATUM. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME AND YOUR CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU MA'AM. MADAM SECRETARY, PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER. SUMMER WAS. IF WE COULD KEEP IT DOWN, PLEASE. ON DECK, IRMA DONAHUE. GOOD EVENING. I AM HERE SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF 114 GARLAND CITIZENS TONIGHT. SO I WAS ASKING FOR SOMEONE WHO IS GOING TO GIVE ME HIS THREE MINUTES, IF THAT'S OKAY. LAST NIGHT AT THE WORK SESSION, I HEARD AGAIN FROM SOME OF YOU THAT IT'S JUST WE KEEP SEEING THE SAME PEOPLE THAT ARE OPPOSED TO THIS, AND WE'RE NOT SEEING MORE FACES. WELL, THERE'S A LOT OF REASONS WHY PEOPLE CAN'T COME, AND THEY HAVE GIVEN ME PERMISSION TO SAY THEIR NAME OUT LOUD, THAT THEY ARE O OPPOSED T THIS, AND WOULD PREFER SOME OF THEM HAD SAID THEY PREFER THAT YOU TAKE IT TO A VOTE. ROBERT JIMENEZ, JEREMY NICHOLS, BYRON AND LISA LAWRENCE, DISTRICT FIVE TIM COVINGTON, LIZ AND PHIL NEWMAN. DISTRICT FIVE BOB AND DOLORES CROWDUS. WE ARE SENIORS AND DON'T DRIVE AT NIGHT ANYMORE. GEORGE BUSBEE, MICHAEL AND STEPHANIE TURNER, KEITH AND VICKI LEWIS, ROSE STEPHENS, DANA SHANNON. DISTRICT SEVEN BRENDA AND MIKE MAYO. THANK YOU FOR BEING OUR VOICE. WE'RE BOTH ON CANES AND IT'S DIFFICULT FOR US TO WALK. PLEASE, PAT
[00:35:06]
ASHCROFT, AMANDA ASHCROFT AND SKYLER MILLER ARE OPPOSING OPTING IN. KELLY BURGESS, LIDA AND TERRY BOATMAN DISTRICT ONE. WE DON'T DRIVE AT NIGHT. MICHAEL AND CANDICE CHAPLIN, DISTRICT FOUR AUDREY SUMRALL, DISTRICT EIGHT JOHN AND VICKI ERICKSON, MICHAEL AND SUE WRIGHT, DISTRICT ONE. WE PLAN TO BE THERE, BUT THE CAR OUR CAR WATER PUMP BLEW UP WENDY AND MICHAEL HINTON AND LITTLE DISTRICT FOUR VICTORIA STEVENS, KARA ROBERTS, PAUL JONES AND SHARON JONES. DISTRICT THREE DEBORAH AND TERRY MORRIS, LESLIE HENRY. DISTRICT SIX TERRY LOCKLEAR, BEVERLY LOCKLEAR, KATHY SMITH. DISTRICT ONE SHARON, ASHLEY AND ROD MASTERSON WE WANT THIS PUT ON THE BALLOT RICHARD WEEKS, BELINDA STEVENS, BRAD AND TANYA PINK. DISTRICT FOUR DAWN BLESSING GAME. DISTRICT EIGHT VOTERS. GLENN WILKINSON. THE DISTRICT THREE SHARON REED. DISTRICT FIVE BRITTANY BISHOP. DISTRICT THREE LISA AND STEVEN WEAVER, ED MOORE'S DISTRICT ALAN ELAINE PIXLEY, ALICIA BASS, JACK AND RHONDA MELTON. I'M A LIFELONG RESIDENT OF GARLAND AND A RETIRED GARLAND FIRE DEPARTMENT. MIKE DOMAN, ZIPCODE 75 040 CYNTHIA BLAIR, BRENDA AND MIKE MAYO, DISTRICT SEVEN ANGELA SESSIONS. DISTRICT EIGHT CHRIS OTT. I'M DISAPPOINTED IN YOUR STANCE ON THIS. KIM AND TONI ULMEN. DISTRICT SEVEN RONNIE AND LINDA BIRD. DISTRICT FIVE PITTED ON THE BALLOT AND NO AUTO OPT IN. ALLISON MCCULLER, BETH PRICE, DISTRICT ONE KRISTIN HARMON, DISTRICT ONE STEPHANIE CANNON, DISTRICT EIGHT KAREN JO COLLINS, WHITE. DISTRICT TWO VICTORIA ESPINOSA, DISTRICT THREE SHERRY VARNELL.DISTRICT FIVE ALEX AND CRYSTAL KOWALSKI. DISTRICT EIGHT RANDY SMITH AND SONYA SMITH, JANA VEIT, MILDRED GARCIA ALLEN AND CHRIS BURNETT. CALDWELL STEVEN RHODES. DISTRICT SEVEN DARYL MARSHALL AND JACK MARSHALL. DISTRICT SIX CATHERINE JAMES, RUSSELL BOWLES, ALLISON MCCULLER, DOLORES MARRERO, DIANE KIRST. DISTRICT EIGHT STACY MORRIS, MARVIN, AND KAREN STEBBINS. DISTRICT ONE MARIBEL DIEGO. DISTRICT EIGHT DARYL MARSHALL. DISTRICT THREE SHERRY BIES. DISTRICT SEVEN JERRY RUDOLPH, KAREN JO COLLINS, WHITE. DISTRICT TWO STEVE GILMORE, AMELIA GREEN, NANCY JO WILLIAMS. DISTRICT FOUR DAVID AND MARIE SEBASTIAN, D3. WE ARE IN OUR 30S AND WOULD HAVE NEVER KNOWN ABOUT THIS IF IT WEREN'T FOR THE FACEBOOK MOVEMENT.
PATRICIA CLAY AND JANINE BARTA, MICHAEL WHALEN, KATRINA JACKMAN, BILL AND RUTH ANDREWS CATHERINE MEJIA DISTRICT TWO LIONEL GALVAN, CHRISTINE HIXON. DISTRICT FOUR CARLA MARTIN SMITH. DISTRICT SIX KATHY BARRON. DISTRICT FOUR WILLIAM AND SHARON PEACH. DISTRICT THREE AMY HAYES, ■PATSY KITTLE'. DISTRICT TWO ANDREA RUSH I WANT THE ABILITY TO VOTE STEVEN RHODES. DISTRICT SEVEN DARYL AND JACK MARSHALL, DISTRICT THREE LISA BOVEY. DISTRICT ONE KEISHA TORRES, SARAH AND DUANE BENNETT. DISTRICT THREE I'M OPPOSED TO UNAUTHORIZED BILLING.
TWEE DOE, DISTRICT ONE MARY MAY AND BRANDON CRAIG, MARCY WISDOM. DISTRICT ONE LAQUITA GOODMAN.
DISTRICT TWO WENDY SAMUELS. DISTRICT THREE KATHY MCGUIRE. DISTRICT THREE SHARON REED.
DISTRICT FIVE JUDY PEACOCK. DISTRICT ONE MARY AND EMMA CANO. DISTRICT ONE MADELINE BACH.
DISTRICT THREE LIBBY HARGROVE. DADAVIDA JOHNSON, DOCTOR AND MR. MICHAEL ALLEN. DISTRICT THREE BILL AND RUTH ANDREWS. DISTRICT EIGHT JOHN SHERMAN. DISTRICT THREE MARIA AND RORY REISER.
DISTRICT FIVE VICKI CHEATWOOD. DISTRICT FIVE. ALLOW OUR CITIZENS TO VOTE. AND PENNY RINEHART, THAT'S 114 NAMES THAT I'VE CALLED OUT TONIGHT. AND THERE'S STILL MORE COMING IN.
AND I ACTUALLY DID IT IN THE TIME. THANK YOU FOR LISTENING. AND THEY DID GIVE ME PERMISSION TO CALL OUT THEIR NAMES TONIGHT TO LET YOU GUYS. THANK YOU. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER? IRMA DONAHUE, UP ON DECK, WESLEY JOHNSON. ADDRESS? FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. IRMA DONAHUE, 4014 GREENWAY DRIVE, GARLAND, TEXAS, 75041. I THINK MD PATHWAYS IS A GOOD PROGRAM ON ITS OWN, BUT I OPPOSE IT BEING AUTOMATICALLY
[00:40:06]
ADDED TO OUR UTILITY BILL WHERE RESIDENTS WOULD NEED TO OPT OUT SO THEY AREN'T CHARGED. I'M IN FAVOR OF ADDING IT TO THE MAY BALLOT. THANK YOU. MA'AM. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, WESLEY JOHNSON, UP ON DECK? DAVID HOGUE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MY NAME IS WESLEY JOHNSON. I LIVE AT 3007 BLUFFVIEW DRIVE. GARLAND. 75043. DISTRICT THREE, MR. MORRIS DISTRICT. FOR 20 YEARS, I'VE BEEN A ELECTION CLERK OR ELECTION JUDGE FOR DALLAS COUNTY. AND THE REASON I AM IS BECAUSE I LOVE DEMOCRACY. GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE IS BEST DEMONSTRATED BY DIRECT VOTES. REMEMBER, THIS IS THE 250TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. AND I SUGGEST TO YOU THAT VOTING BY PEOPLE WAS THE HEART OF THE STRUGGLE. THEY THREW OFF A GOVERNMENT OF A KING FOR THE PURPOSES OF HAVING A GOVERNMENT BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE AND OF THE PEOPLE. AND THAT'S WHY I'M FOR THE SPECIAL ELECTION AND LET THIS ISSUE BE BAITED IN THE ELECTION PROCESS.THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. SIR. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, DAVID HOGUE, UP ON DECK, CARL SMITH? YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. HEY, DAVID HOGUE, 534, PAULA GARLAND 75040. HOPING TO PRESENT A BIT OF A BALANCED APPROACH ON ALL OF THIS. SO, AS MANY HAVE MENTIONED, THIS WHOLE OPT IN AUTOMATICALLY THING, IN MY OPINION, NOT THE BEST WAY TO DO IT. I UNDERSTAND THERE IS MERIT BEHIND THE IDEA OF OFFERING A SERVICE TO THE CITIZENS, BECAUSE LET'S BE HONEST, THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IS A MESS. WE DO NEED SOME WAY TO HELP MAKE IT MORE AFFORDABLE AND MORE ACCESSIBLE, BUT SO FAR WE'VE SEEN ONE OPTION PRESENTED AND THAT'S IT. IF YOU'RE MAKING A MAJOR PURCHASE, YOU DON'T JUST GO WITH THE FIRST OPTION. YOU SEE, YOU DO YOUR RESEARCH. YOU LOOK AT WHO'S OFFERING THE SERVICE, WHO CAN OFFER THE BEST QUALITY FOR THE BEST PRICE, AND SO FAR JUST HAVEN'T SEEN THAT HERE. AND I THINK THAT'S WHERE WE NEED TO START OVER. LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT THE OPTIONS AND SEE WHAT WORKS BEST FOR EVERYONE, AS OPPOSED TO JUST GRABBING THE FIRST THING THAT WE SEE OFF THE SHELF AND JUST CALLING IT A DAY. A LOT OF RED FLAGS HAVE BEEN BROUGHT UP, ESPECIALLY WITH THE WHOLE OPT IN THING THAT'S BEEN DONE TO DEATH. BUT EVEN BESIDES THAT, I'VE ALSO HEARD THAT THERE'S PEOPLE CONCERNED ABOUT. IF YOU DO SIGN UP FOR THIS, IF SOMETHING GOES WRONG AND PATHWAYS ISN'T LIABLE FOR IT. AND I'VE HEARD I DON'T KNOW HOW TRUE THIS IS, BUT SUPPOSEDLY THEY DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO MEDICAL RECORDS. NOT GOOD FOR A HEALTH SERVICE IF THAT IS THE CASE. SO ANOTHER THING TO THINK ABOUT. SO THAT ALL BEING SAID, I SUPPORT PUTTING THIS TO A VOTE. IF WE LOSE EMPTY PATHWAYS, THAT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE THE END OF THE IDEA. LET'S JUST TRY TO DO A LITTLE MORE DUE DILIGENCE IN THE PROCESS AND ULTIMATELY SEEK SOMETHING THAT'S BEST FOR EVERYONE HERE. THANK YOU ALL. THANK YOU SIR. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, CARL SMITH, AND ON DECK, TONYA DOWNING? NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES, THREE SECONDS. MY NAME IS CARL SMITH, 2216 RIDGE OAK DRIVE. WELL, HERE WE ARE AGAIN AFTER MONTHS OF DISCORD. WOULD REALLY BE NICE IF WE COULD END IT. THIS WAS NEVER ABOUT THE PROGRAM. BEING GOOD OR NOT IS ABOUT FUNDAMENTALLY, FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGING A UTILITY BILL AND FORCING THE CITIZENS ON IT WITHOUT SUFFICIENT INPUT. IF THIS STANDS WITHOUT THE COUNCIL PUTTING IT TO A VOTE, WHAT'S NEXT? WHAT OTHER THIRD PARTY FOR PROFIT COMPANY WILL WE FORCE OUR CITIZENS TO ACCEPT THEIR PRODUCT AGAIN WITHOUT OUR PERMISSION? EXCUSE ME. WE NEED TO ALLOW OUR CITIZENS TO VOTE ON ANY NEW FEES ADDED TO THEIR UTILITY BILL. IT IS WITHIN YOUR POWER TO RESTORE THE TRUST THAT YOU HAVE LOST DUE TO THIS SITUATION. IT IS OUR RIGHT TO VOTE FOR FUNDAMENTAL CHANGES TO OUR UTILITY MUNICIPAL UTILITY BILL. DO NOT ALLOW THE GUILT TRIPPING AND THE THREATS BY THE
[00:45:02]
VENDOR TO SWAY YOU FROM YOUR DUTY TO THE CITIZENS OF GARLAND, I KEPT HEARING THE TERM SLOW DOWN LAST NIGHT IN THE WORK SESSION. WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN? YOU'RE EITHER GOING TO VOTE TO DISENFRANCHIZE YOUR VOTERS AND ACCEPT THIS CONTRACT, OR ARE YOU GOING TO ALLOW YOUR VOTERS TO DECIDE THE DIRECTION OF OUR CITY? RESTORE THE TRUST OF YOUR CITIZENS BY ALLOWING THEM TO MAKE THE FINAL DECISION ON THIS DIVISIVE SUBJECT? DO THE RIGHT THING FOR YOUR CITIZENS, NOT FOR MD PATHWAYS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, TANYA DOWNING, ON DECK, DANNY STARNES. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS TANYA DOWNING, AND I SERVE AS THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF HOPE CLINIC OF GARLAND, 800 SOUTH SIXTH STREET. WE ARE IN DISTRICT TWO, AND I'M JUST HERE TO TO SHOW OR TO HAVE WORDS OF APPRECIATION, APPRECIATION FOR THEORK THAT WE DO HERE IN GARLAND, APPRECIATION FOR THE CITY OF GARLAND AND APPRECIATION FOR THE COMMUNITY. HOPE CLINIC IS A FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINIC. WE PROVIDE MEDICAL SERVICES FOR THE UNDERSERVED COMMUNITY, FOR THOSE THAT DO NOT HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE, THOSE THAT ARE 200% BELOW THE FEDERAL POVERTY GUIDELINES. AND THAT MEANS A FAMILY OF FOUR, THOUGH A FAMILY OF FOUR WILL EQUAL TO $66,000 A YEAR. WE ARE SO GRATEFUL TO BE THE ONLY NONPROFIT IN GARLAND FOR 25 YEARS, PROVIDING FREE MEDICAL SERVICES FOR THE UNDERSERVED COMMUNITY, AND I'M SO GRATEFUL TO SERVE AS THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NOW THIS MONTH FOR FIVE YEARS. AND SO I'M HERE TODAY JUST TO SAY THANK YOU TO GARLAND. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY OF FUNDING THE WORK, THE HARD WORK THAT WE DO AT HOPE CNIC THROUGH THE CDBG GRANT. WE ALSO RECEIVE OTHER FUNDING SOURCES FROM INDIVIDUALS, FROM GRANTS, FROM CORPORATE SUPPORTERS RIGHT HERE IN GARLAND. AND SO FOR THAT, WE ARE GRATEFUL. AND THEN I'D LIKE TO EXTEND AN INVITATION. SOME OF YOU KNOW ME AND YOU'VE BEEN THE WHOLE CLINIC, AND I'M THANKFUL FOR THAT. BUT FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT HAVE NOT BEEN TO HOPE CLINIC, I INVITE YOU TO COME AND TOUR HOPE CLINIC, I INVITE ALL OF YOU TO COME AND TOUR HOPE CLINIC TO SEE THE WORK THAT WE DO. 71% OF OUR PATIENT POPULATION IS HISPANICS, AND SO THEREFORE SPANISH IS THE LANGUAGE THAT'S SPOKEN IN THE CLINIC ALL DAY LONG. WE ARE MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAYS. ON THURSDAY WE OPEN LATE SO WE CAN PROVIDE URGENT CARE FOR THOSE THAT HAVE THAT, FOR THOSE THAT WORK IN THE DAY TIME AND CANNOT MAKE IT TO APPOINTMENTS DURING THE DAY THAT WE OPEN LATER. FOR THEM TO ALLOW THEM TO HAVE THEIR MEDICAL NEEDS TAKEN CARE OF. SO AGAIN, I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU TO THE CITY OF GARLAND FOR ALL THE WORK THAT YOU'RE DOING HERE AND ONLY, AND ALSO FOR THE PATIENTS THAT WE SERVE AT HOPE CLINIC OF GARLAND.SO THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOUU MA'AM. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, DANNY STARNES, UP ON DECK? DOCTOR. DIRK PARROT, STARRING 6509 FALLBROOK DRIVE, GARLAND, TEXAS. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. AND THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS, FOR THAT SINCERE PRAYER. I KNOW IT WAS FROM THE HEART. JAMES ONE FIVE TELLS US, IF WE LACK WISDOM, GOD WILL GIVE IT TO US GENEROUSLY. THANK YOU FOR THAT. I WANT TO TAKE EVERYONE BACK TO MARCH 27TH, 2025, WHEN MD HEALTH PATHWAYS FIRST PRESENTED THIS PGRAM TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHAIRED BY COUNCILMAN BASS, HE CLOSED THAT MEETING WITH THREE WORDS TRANSPARENCY. TRANSPARENCY. TRANSPARENCY. I'M NOT HERE TONIGHT TO QUESTION HIS SINCERITY. IN FACT, THIS ITEM WILL NOT EVEN BE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA IF COUNCILMAN BASS HAD NOT REQUESTED IT. BUT COUNCILWOMAN DUTTON SECONDED IT. SO THANK YOU FOR THAT. WHAT I AM HERE TO QUESTION IS THE TRANSPARENCY OF THE COMPANY HIRED TO COMMUNICATE THIS PROGRAM TO THE CITIZENS OF GARLAND. WE'RE TALKING 81,771 HOUSEHOLDS WITH A POPULATION OF 250,000 PEOPLE. AND THEY STILL DON'T KNOW. YOU HEARD PEOPLE COME UP HERE TODAY THAT'S NEVER HEARD ABOUT THIS PROGRAM. IT'S BEEN MONTHS. MD HEALTH PATHWAYS ENTIRE BUSINESS MODEL DEPENDS ON PEOPLE NOT KNOWING. NO TRANSPARENCY WHATSOEVER. YESTERDAY AT THE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION, THEIR CEO, DOCTOR DIRK PARROT, SAID THAT IF THIS COUNCIL ALLOWS THE CITIZENS OF GARLAND TO VOTE, THINK ABOUT THIS. IF Y'ALL ALLOW US TO VOTE, THEY WILL CANCEL THE CONTRACT.
ASK YOURSELF WHY? WHY WOULD A COMPANY WALK AWAY SIMPLY BECAUSE THE PEOPLE ARE ALLOWED TO VOTE? WHY FEAR THE VOICE OF THE CITIZENS? WE WERE PROMISED CLEAR COMMUNICATION ABOUT THE
[00:50:02]
MANDATORY FEE AND HOW TO OPT OUT. YET THE FLOWER I RECEIVED, FLIER I RECEIVED IN MY UTILITY BILL HIGHLIGHTS THE BENEFITS OF THE PROGRAM. THIS IS A GREAT PROGRAM. JOIN. HERE'S A NUMBER.GO TO THE QR CODE. IT PULLS UP THE NUMBER AGAIN TO JOIN. NOT ONE THING ABOUT OPTING OUT, NOT ONE THING ABOUT THE FORCED FEE. NOTHING IS JUST A MARKETING PLOY. MISSED OPPORTUNITY TO TELL US ABOUT THIS PROGRAM AND THAT INFORMATION IS MISSING FROM THIS FLIER. BY DESIRING THIS BUSINESS MODEL ONLY WORKS IF THE PRODUCT IS FORCED ON PEOPLE WITHOUT THEIR KNOWLEDGE AND WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT. IT'S TIME FOR PEOPLE TO HAVE A CHOICE WITH FULL TRANSPARENCY, SOMETHING ONLY A PUBLIC VOTE CAN PROVIDE. THE ONLY WAY TO BEGIN RESTORING PUBLIC TRUST IS TO ALLOW CITIZENS TO CAST THEIR VOTE. THIS IS THE FIRST MEANINGFUL STEP TO HEALING OUR COMMUNITY. VOTING REMOVES ALL GUESSWORK. IT'S A CORNERSTONE OF OUR DEMOCRACY, AND IT LEVELS THE PLAYING FIELD FOR EVERYONE. EACH PERSON, WHETHER YOU'RE A DOCTOR, WHETHER YOU'RE A LAWYER, A TEACHER, A BUSINESS OWNER, A YOUNG ADULT, OR A SENIOR CITIZEN GETS EXACTLY ONE VOTE.
NO ONE ELSE DECIDES HOW THAT VOTE IS CAST. ONLY THE INDIVIDUAL VOTER DOES. I RESPTFULLY ASK ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS TO VOTE TO PLACE THIS DINANCE ON THE BALLOT, AND GIVE EVERY CITIZEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE THEIR VOICE HEARD. THANK YOU SIR. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, DOCTOR DIRK PARROT ON DECK, DEBORAH AYERS. ALL RIGHT. COUNCIL. THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO BE HERE. BEFORE I START, I JUST WOULD LIKE TO TELL WHY WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY. IF THERE'S ANYTHING WE HEARD YESTERDAY, THERE'S THERE'S A LACK OF ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE IN GARLAND. 45% OF GARLAND, EITHER UNINSURED OR UNDERINSURED. I SEE THEM EVERY DAY. I STILL WORK IN THE ER, IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT. A LOT OF THINGS THAT ARE. COULD HAVE JUST BEEN A SIMPLE CONVERSATION.
GET CHARGED $1,500 WHEN THEY SHOW UP TO MY EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT. THIS IS NOT SOME SCHEME. THIS IS NOT SOME SCAM. THIS IS NOT A WAY TO EXTRACT MONEY OUT OF UNWITTING PEOPLE.
WE HAVE OFFERED EASY WAYS TO OPT OUT. WE HAVE GIVEN EVERYONE A DECISION. QUITE FRANKLY, WE'VE GIVEN COUNCIL OFF RAMPS IN THE BEGINNING AND A SIX MONTH OPPORTUNITY TO GET OUT OF THE CONTRACT. BUT AS A DOC, I AM A DOCTOR. I'M NOT A POLITICIAN. AND I ADMIT THIS COULD HAVE BEEN ROLLED OUT MUCH BETTER. PUBLIC INFORMATION COULD HAVE GONE OUT MUCH MORE EASILY. BUT WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS A PROBLEM WITH HEALTH CARE. WE'VE GOT SOME UPSET PUBLIC AND QUITE FRANKLY, I CAN UNDERSTAND THEM BEING UPSET BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOT BEEN AWARE LIKE THEY HAD INTENDED TO BE AWARE, AND PARTIALLY BECAUSE AFTER THE CONTRACT WAS SIGNED AND WE'VE BEEN IN THE COMMUNITY, MY HANDS HAVE BEEN TIED. I'VE ASKED TO SEND A MAILER TO EVERY SINGLE RESIDENT SHOWING HOW TO USE THE SYSTEM, HOW TO OPT OUT. I'VE ASKED TO DO A REVERSE 911 NOTIFICATION TO EVERY SINGLE INDIVIDUAL AT OUR COST, AND WE'VE BEEN TOLD NO. SO I'M GOING TO LEAVE IT UP TO COUNCIL TONIGHT. YOU GUYS ARE THE LEADERS OF THE COMMUNITY. YOU DON'T NEED TO SPEND $200,000 ON A ON A NON-BINDING REFERENDUM OF OF WHAT WILL LIKELY BE 4000 PEOPLE. I JUST CHALLENGE YOU TO TO BE THE LEADERS. WE'VE WE'VE GIVEN YOU OPTIONS TO TO MOVE OUT OF THE CONTRACT. IF COUNCIL DECIDES WE'VE GIVEN YOU A SIX MONTH OPPORTUNITY TO TRY THE SERVICE AND LEAVE, I'LL LEAVE THAT THE LEADERS TODAY, THAT IS YOUR GUYS, RIGHT? THAT IS YOUR DECISION AS ELECTED OFFICIALS TO REPRESENT EVERYONE. BUT WHAT I CANNOT PROMISE, I CANNOT PROMISE THE SERVICE THAT WE'VE NOW OFFERED TO 10,000 INDIVIDUALS THAT WE'RE CURRENTLY SERVING, THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO SERVE, THAT THERE ARE UNFORTUNATELY GOING TO HAVE TO FIND THAT OPPORTUNITY ELSEWHERE. BUT I, I WOULD LOVE TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY OF GARLAND IF GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER? OH, HOLD ON ONE SECOND, DOCTOR. DIRK, I HAVE A QUESTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS. GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING. SIR. YOU YOU TOLD US THAT YOU SHARED HAD CONVERSATION WITH SOMEBODY. THE CITY AND THE OPTION OF OF SENDING A LETTER OR TO EVERY HOME AND OR SENDING A TEXT TO EVERY HOME. AND YOU WERE TOLD NO. RIGHT. YOU DON'T HAVE TO GIVE ME A NAME. BUT WHO WAS THE OFFICIAL? THE CITY THAT TOLD YOU THAT? IT WAS ASKED MULTIPLE TIMES. AND IT'S GARLAND'S STAFF THAT TOLD US, NO, NO, YOU CAN'T. YOU HAVE TO DO BETTER THAN THAT.
[00:55:01]
GIVE ME. YOU TALKED TO AN INDIVIDUAL. I NEED TO KNOW WHAT THAT PERSON'S RESPONSIBILITY WAS OR IS. I'M WAITING. SIR. HE'S SITTING RIGHT NEXT TO YOU. WHAT'S HERE? YES, CITY MANAGER, CAN YOU RESPOND TO THAT, PLEASE? NEVER. I'VE NEVER HEARD SUCH A CONVERSATION. HAVE WE GOT TEXT MESSAGE AND EMAIL? IF YOU WANT TO SEE HIM WITH ME. BRIAN HAD OFFERED TO DO A REVERSE 911 CALL TO EVERY SINGLE ONE OF US TO USE OUR EMERGENCY WARNING SYSTEM, AND OUR EMS DIRECTOR SAID, IF YOU USE THE EMERGENCY WARNING SYSTEM FOR SOMETHING OTHER THAN A TORNADO OR SEVERE STORM, IT WOULD MAKE THAT SYSTEM USELESS. IN THE FUTURE. IF YOU START USING IT FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN THE PURPOSE. IT WAS DESIGNED, AND THAT'S WHAT I TOLD THEM. AND THEN WE HAD REACHED OUT TO ANOTHER COMPANY THAT DOES THE SAME SERVICE. BUT THAT'S NOT YOUR EMERGENCY SERVICE THAT CAN DO THE SAME THING AT OUR COST. WE OFFERED TO DO IT NOT THROUGH YOUR REVERSE 911 EMERGENCY SYSTEM. WE ALSO OFFERED THIS IN A MAILER TO EVERY SINGLE INDIVIDUAL IN THE COUNTY AT OUR COST. I MEAN, IN THE IN THE CITY THAT WAS AT A CITY COUNCIL MEETING, NOT SUGGESTED BY ME, SUGGESTED BY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS TO THE MAYOR WHO SAID NO. OKAY, SIR, I'LL ACCEPT YOUR RESPONSE. BUT I WAS AT I HAVEN'T MISSED BUT A FEW CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, AND I DON'T RECALL THOSE DISCUSSIONS. OKAY, OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. AND WHATEVER I SAY AT A MEETING DOESN'T PREVENT YOUR FIRST AMENDMENT. RIGHT. I RAN A CAMPAIGN FOR THE WHOLE CITY, AND I SENT OUT MAILERS. MANY PEOPLE IN THIS ROOM RIGHT NOW, YOU CAN ALWAYS SEND OUT A MAILER AT YOUR EXPENSE. MY CONTENTION WAS USING CITY FUNDS AND GOING ABOVE AND BEYOND THE CONTRACT THAT WE SIGNED TO SEND OUT TO USE ADDITIONAL CITY FUNDS TO SEND OUT MAILERS ON BEHALF. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, DEBORAH AYERS, ON DECK, BOB DUCKWORTH? GOOD EVENING.
I'M DEBORAH AYERS, 3458 HEATHER HILL DRIVE, DISTRICT ONE. I'M HERE TO RESPECTFULLY ASK YOU TO VOTE TO ADD THE TAP TELEHEALTH TOPIC AS A SPECIAL PROPOSITION IN THE MAY ELECTION AND ITS FUNDING THROUGH A SEPARATE UTILITY TARIFF ON THE CITY UTILITY BILL, WE TAX PAYING CONSTITUENTS DESERVE A VOTE ON THIS TOPIC, WHETHER WE ARE FOR OR AGAINST IT. PLEASE LET US SPEAK. MY COUNCILMAN BASS MADE A SOCIAL MEDIA POST SIX DAYS AGO STATING THAT HE MADE A MOTION TO ADD THIS TOPIC TO THE AGENDA, WITH COUNCILWOMAN DUTTON SECONDING THE MOTION.
AND I APPLAUD YOU BOTH FOR BRINGING THAT THAT MEASURE TO US. LET ME QUOTE COUNCILMAN BASS'S POST. GIVEN HOW THIS PROGRAM WAS ADVANCED LAST YEAR AND THE LEVEL OF PUBLIC INTEREST IT HAS GENERATED, I BELIEVE THE RIGHT PATH FORWARD IS TO RESET AND LET THE VOTERS DECIDE. NEXT WEEK'S CITY COUNCIL AGENDA INCLUDES AN ITEM TO PLACE THIS QUESTION ON THE MAY BALLOT. THIS ENSURES RESIDENTS, NOT CITY HALL, MAKE THE FINAL DECISION ON WHETHER THIS PROGRAM IS RIGHT FOR GARLAND. END QUOTE. AND I WHOLEHEARTEDLY AGREE WITH THAT AND I HOPE YOU HOLD YOURSELF TO IT. MR. BASS, I SPOKE AT THE 120 WORK SESSION BUT WAS UNABLE TO ATTEND LAST NIGHT AT THE JANUARY SESSION. MANY OF YOU STATED YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE DON'T TRUST YOU, OR WHY PEOPLE THINK SOMETHING SHADY IS GOING ON, BUT I FIND OUT THAT LAST NIGHT, MANY OF YOU WHO SAID YOU WANTED TO BRING THIS VOTE TO THE PEOPLE ARE WAFFLING AND I DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT. SO PLEASE BRING IT TO A VOTE. SECOND, I WOULD LIKE TO GET SOME TRANSPARENCY ON WHY WE HAVE BOTH FORMER AND CURRENT DALLAS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ENGAGING IN DISCUSSIONS ON SITE HERE AT CITY HALL AND ON OUR COUNCIL REP SOCIAL MEDIA PAGE.
WHAT IS THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO MD HEALTH PATHWAYS? BACK ON AUGUST 9TH POST VOTE, MY HUSBAND AND I MET CURRENT DALLAS DALLAS CITY COUNCILMAN ADAM BAZALDUA IN THE LOBBY WHEN WE WERE TALKING TO MD PATHWAYS. BRIAN ASKING QUESTIONS. I FOLLOW DALLAS CITY COUNCIL AND I RECOGNIZED HIM AND HE WAS HELPING MD HEALTH WITH THE SPEAKERS THEY BROUGHT IN. THEN JUST THIS AFTERNOON, FORMER DALLAS COUNCILMAN PHILIP KINGSTON COMMENTED ON JEFF BASS POST SOUNDING VERY MUCH LIKE HE IS TRYING TO INFLUENCE MR. BASS'S VOTE, STATING IT'S NOT A
[01:00:05]
GOOD IDEA TO GO BACK ON HIS WORD TO MD HEALTH. WHY IS DALLAS TRYING TO INFLUENCE GARLAND ON THIS SERVICE, AND WHAT IS THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO MD HEALTH? I WILL RESTATE IT AGAIN. WE CONSTITUENTS WANT FULL TRANSPARENCY, SO PLEASE BRING THIS TO A VOTE. THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR TIME TO THE CITY. ONE SECOND, MA'AM. QUESTION FOR YOU, COUNCILMEMBER BASS. THANK YOU. KNOW, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO STATE FOR THE RECORD, I HAVE NEVER MET A FORMER OR PRESENT DALLAS CITY COUNCIL PERSON. I'VE NEVER RECEIVED, NOR GIVEN ANY COMMUNICATION TO ANY OF THEM. I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, BOB DUCKWORTH, ON DECK? GREG YEARSLEY. NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES, SIR. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. BOB DUCKWORTH, 909 WAKEFIELD. NO CLINIC TESTIMONY. I WAS A PART OF THAT ORGANIZATION, A GROUP, 25 YEARS AGO. WE HAD A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT SAID, THAT'LL NEVER WORK. IT TAKES TIME FOR THINGS TO WORK. AND I HOPE THAT WE KEEP AN OPEN MIND TONIGHT. AND MY COMMENTS. Y'ALL ALL KNOW ME. YOU KNOW HOW MY DESIRE FOR TRANSPARENCY AND HONESTY IS.ABOVE ALL. I HOPE YOU ALL LEARNED SOMETHING THROUGH THIS PROCESS. IF WE DIDN'T, WE NEED TO START OVER DOING SOMETHING ELSE. IT'S TRANSPARENCY AND GETTING PEOPLE INVOLVED EARLY.
WE'VE LEARNED THAT. WE'VE HEARD THE COMMENTS OF THE OF THE PEOPLE HERE TONIGHT. WE CAN'T GO BACK AND CHANGE THAT. UNFORTUNATELY, I BELIEVE DOCTOR PERRY AND HIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE AN IMPORTANT LINK FOR MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COMMUNITY WHO NEED THIS SERVICE. AND YES, YOU HAVE TO ADMIT YOU WOULD HAVE TO REDO. YOU'D DO IT DIFFERENTLY. THE WHOLE THING. A LOT OF THINGS IN LIFE WE WOULD DO AS ADULTS DIFFERENTLY. I'VE HAD MORE. I HAD MORE TIME THAN YOU HAVE, SO I'VE GOT MORE MISTAKES TO LEARN FROM. BUT WE'RE HERE TONIGHT TO MAKE A HARD DECISION. I'M GOING TO CHALLENGE YOU. THERE'S A LOT OF FACTS AND FACTORS THAT COULD BE REHEARSED. BOTTOM LINE, WE'RE HERE TONIGHT TO MAKE A DECISION. I BELIEVE WE SHOULD MAKE A DECISION TONIGHT. I PERSONALLY USE THIS SERVICE. I CAN AFFORD TO GO TO THE DOCTOR. I HAVE A VERY FINE DOCTOR THAT I PRAISE GOD FOR, BUT I FOUND OUT HOW EASY IT WAS TO TO CONTACT THEM.
I HAD THE FLU IN THE MIDDLE OF DECEMBER, AND WITHIN TWO HOURS I HAD MEDICATION TAKING IT, THE FLU. SO THEIR SERVICE DOES PAY UP, PAY OUT. I'M I'M ONE OF THE OLDER PEOPLE THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE SAY YOU HAVEN'T HEARD ABOUT IT. THEY DON'T KNOW ABOUT IT. I THINK GOING TO GOING TO YOUR OWN DOCTOR AND DEALING WITH THESE PEOPLE OVER THE, OVER THE PHONE IS KIND OF SIMILAR. IT'S BUT, YOU KNOW, USUALLY WHEN I GO TO THE DOCTOR HE SAYS, HOW ARE YOU FEELING? WHAT'S YOUR SYMPTOMS? AND BETWEEN US, PRETTY QUICK THAT WE DECIDE WHAT'S WRONG. THERE'S NO DIFFERENCE IN THIS PROCESS. IT'S A MATTER OF HOW ARE YOU FEELING, WHAT YOU'RE DOING.
MANY PEOPLE HERE TONIGHT THINK THE OPT OUT IS AN IMPORTANT DOWNSIDE TO THIS. I THINK THE FACT THAT YOU CAN OPT OUT IS AN IMPORTANT PART OF THIS. WE'VE WE'VE COME MANY MONTHS TO THIS POINT. SO I THINK IF WE DON'T WANT THIS TO MOVE FORWARD, I THINK, YOU KNOW, TAKE THAT OPPORTUNITY TO OPT OUT. MY FIRST THOUGHT WAS I PROBABLY WILL OPT OUT, BUT I WON'T. NOW, LIKE MANY PEOPLE, I MIGHT PAY SOMEBODY ELSE'S FEE TO HELP A FAMILY OF 5 OR 6 TO HAVE THIS SERVICE. SOME OF YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY INDICATED YOUR SUPPORT OF THE TELEHEALTH PROGRAM, AND THE RATIO IS IS A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY. AND I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO MOVE FORWARD WITH A VOTE AND NOT CIRCLE THIS AROUND FOR 4 OR 5 MONTHS. I THINK A NONBINDING RESOLUTION IS IS GOING TO GIVE YOU SOME KIND OF A METER TO LOOK AT, BUT IT'S GOING TO BE UP TO YOU TO MAKE THAT DECISION IN THE END. AND I'M ENCOURAGING YOU TO IF YOU HAVE TO REDO YOUR AGENDA, DO THAT AND VOTE TONIGHT TO PROCEED FORWARD WITH WITH THIS PROJECT. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU SIR. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, GREG YEARSLEY, AND UP ON DECK, VICKY BRELSFORD. NAME? ADDRESS? FOR THE RECORD,OU HAVE THREE MINUTES. THANK YOU.
GREG YEARSLEY, 523 BUTTERNUT DRIVE. FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO THANK THE COUNCIL FOR ALL OF YOUR SERVICE TO THE CITIZENS. I KNOW IT'S NOT AN EASY JOB, AND THERE'S OFTEN A FEW POINTS. AND THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR ATTENDING THIS MEETING. I AGREE WITH THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE SPEAKERS SO FAR. I WOULD LIKE TO ADD A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN COVERED QUITE, QUITE AS THOROUGHLY AS PERHAPS THEY SHOULD BE. MOST HEALTH PLANS HAVE A TELEHEALTH SERVICE. AT
[01:05:01]
LEAST THE ONES I'VE SEEN OR BEEN EXPOSED TO. SO WITHOUT A VOTE, THE CURRENT PLAN IS REQUIRING MOST RESIDENTS TO INVOLUNTARILY PAY TWICE THROUGH BOTH THEIR OWN PERSONAL PLAN AND THROUGH A CITY SERVICE FEE. THAT DOESN'T SEEM RIGHT TO ME TO DO THAT TO TO HAVE THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE PAY FOR A FEW WHO MAY USE IT. IN ADDITION, AT A TIME WHEN MOST CITIZENS NATIONWIDE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION AND LACK OF VOICE, THIS AUTOMATIC ADD ON FEE UNLESS RESIDENTS PROACTIVELY OPT OUT SEEMS VERY ILL ADVISED.I'M PARTICULARLY CONCERNED THAT THE FEE IS AUTOMATIC AND BUILT IN, AND THAT WITHOUT A VOTE A HOUSEHOLD IS COMPELLED, REQUIRED AND FORCED TO PAY IT UNLESS THEY PROACTIVELY OPT OUT.
I THINK WE CAN ASSUME THAT MANY CITIZENS MAY NEVER EVEN REALIZE WHAT THE FEE IS, OR THAT IT IS THERE THAT SEEMS DICTATORIAL AND NONTRANSPARENT FOR ALL THOSE REASONS, AND MANY MORE THAT OTHERS MORE ELOQUENT THAN MYSELF HAVE STATED. I THINK A VOTE IN MAY IS MANDATORY, AND WILL GIVE US A MUCH CLEARER IDEA OF WHERE EVERYONE STANDS ON THIS ISSUE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, VICKI BRELSFORD ON DECK, SHIRLEY ROBERTS. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS VICKI BRELSFORD AND I LIVE AT 113 LAFOND CIRCLE IN GARLAND,, TEXA. MY REQUEST IS THAT ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS VOTE TO ADD THE SPECIAL HOME RULE TO THE ELECTION ON MAY 2ND, SO THAT THE CITIZENS OF GARLAND CAN HAVE A VOICE AND A CHOICE. FURTHERMORE, I STRONGLY URGE THAT A LEGITIMATE LETTER BE SENT OUT TO EVERY ADDRESS IN GARLAND, TEXAS REGARDING THE PROGRAM. IT'S IMPERATIVE THAT THIS LETTER PRESENTS A BALANCED VIEW DETAILING NOT ONLY THE POSITIVE ASPECTS, BUT ALSO ADDRESSING ANY POTENTIAL DOWNSIDES. UNLIKE THE ONE SIDED APPROACH SEEN IN THE PREVIOUS LITERATURE NEWSLETTER OR IN SOCIAL MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS BY THE CITY, A MAJOR CONCERN FOR ME IS FOR THE SENIOR CITIZENS OF GARLAND, TEXAS, THAT DO NOT FOLLOW SOCIAL SOCIAL MEDIA AND WHO ARE ON A VERY FIXED BUDGET. IT IS SAD, BUT FOR $6 CAN BE TWO MEALS. FOR SOME INDIVIDUALS, IT MATTERS. MANY SENIORS RELY SOLELY ON THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY CHECKS, AND ANY ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL BURDEN CAN MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR THEM TO AFFORD THE NECESSITIES OR MEDICATIONS.
MY SECOND CONCERN IS FOR THOSE ALREADY PAYING FOR HEALTH CARE AND ON A FIXED BUDGET. WHILE THE CONCEPT OF THE PROGRAM HAS MERIT, IT IS ONE SIDED AND UNFAIR TO IMPOSE A FEE ON INDIVIDUALS IN A HOME AS WELL AS IMPROPER DIAGNOSIS EXPOSURE. I DON'T QUITE UNDERSTAND HOW THE APARTMENT DWELLERS WILL BE EXEMPT AND OR NOT PAY. I'M NOT SURE THAT THAT IS A FAIR PROCESS. IT'S DISHEARTENING TO WITNESS A LACK OF OPEN COMMUNICATION AND GENUINE ENGAGEMENT WITH THE PUBLIC ON SUCH AN IMPACTFUL ISSUE. CITIZENS DESERVE RESPECT AND TRANSPARENCY FROM THEIR ELECTED OFFICIALS, NOT PRESSURE OR MISINFORMATION. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO PRIORITIZE THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS AND ENSURE THAT EVERY RESIDENT IS GIVEN AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE AND BE INFORMED. THEREFORE, AGAIN, URGE THE COUNCIL TO ACT TRANSPARENTLY AND INCLUSIVELY BY ENSURING THAT EVERY RESIDENT IS FULLY INFORMED ABOUT BOTH THE BENEFITS OF THE AND THE POTENTIAL DRAWBACKS OF THE TELEPATH PROGRAM. IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT THE COMMUNICATION SENT TO THE CITIZENS IS UNBIASED AND PROVIDES A BALANCED PERSPECTIVE, ENABLING EACH INDIVIDUAL TO MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION WHEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO. ONLY BY TAKING THESE STEPS CAN WE GUARANTEE THAT THE VOICES OF GARLAND CITIZENS ARE TRULY HEARD AND RESPECTED IN THIS IMPORTANT MATTER. AND COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE IN DISTRICT FOUR AND WHEN YOUR TIME IS UP, I WISH YOU THE BEST OF LUCK. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU MA'AM. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, SHIRLEY ROBERTS, UP ON DECK, AMANDA MADDOX. YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS? FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. SHIRLEY ROBERTS, 2102, COUNTRY OAKS. I WANT TO CORRECT DOCTOR PARROTT FOR SOMETHING THAT HE SAID. HE SAID IT'S GOING TO COST YOU $200,000. TO ADD THIS ON. WE NEED TO CORRECT THAT. IT'S NOT YOUR $200,000. IT'S OUR $200,000 AND IT'S ONLY 150,000 ANYWAY. BUT IT'S THE TAXPAYERS MONEY. AND IF WE WANT TO USE THAT TO ADD THIS AND GET A VOTE ON THIS, WE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO DO THAT. IT'S HARD FOR SOME GARLAND CITIZENS TO COME HERE AND ASK YOU FOR THE RIGHT TO VOICE THEIR OPINION THROUGH THE BALLOT BOX, THE FEW YOU ARE USED TOO SEEING ARE HERE AND NO.
[01:10:02]
I'VE SEEN MANY MORE FACES THAT YOU WANTED TO SEE. NEW FACES, HOPEFULLY ASKING THE SAME QUESTIONS THEY WOULD. FOR INSTANCE, THE WORDS OPT OUT ARE WORDS LISTED ON THIS PROPOSITION. NO, I'M NOT GOING DOWN THAT ROAD, SO DON'T WORRY ABOUT THAT. I SAY THESE WORDS BECAUSE THE LATEST COUNT OF OPT OUTS IS 5771. THERE ARE NOT THAT MANY INDIVIDUALS POSTING THIS ISSUE ON SOCIAL MEDIA. IF WE COULD GET 5771 PEOPLE IN THIS ROOM, I'M SURE THEY WOULD TELL YOU THEY WANT THIS PROPOSITION TO GO ON THE MAY BALLOT. ALSO, YOU WOULD SEE A LOT MORE NEW FACES. THAT'S WHAT YOU WANTED, RIGHT? I'M SURE EVEN MORE THOUSANDS WOULD BE WILLING TO SHOW UP AT THE BALLOT. LET'S TALK ABOUT JUST A MINUTE. LET'S TALK ABOUT TRUST.WHEN AN ELECTED OFFICIAL TELLS YOU HE HAD CONCERNS ABOUT AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT AND TRANSPARENCY, HE BELIEVES THE RIGHT PATH FORWARD IS TO RESET AND LET THE VOTERS DECIDE. AND THEN A WEEK LATER, THE SAME OFFICIAL STATES HE NOW WANTS TO SLOW DOWN THE PROCESS. BUT WE DON'T HAVE TIME. WE HAVE A SHORT WINDOW TO PUT THIS ON THE ISSUE. PUT THIS ISSUE ON THE BALLOT, AND IF IT'S NOT PUT ON, WE HAVE LOST THAT VOTE FOREVER. TRUST IS LOST WHEN WHEN OFFICIALS DO THAT, WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? HOW DO WE BRING OUR COMMUNITY BACK TOGETHER AND MOVE FORWARD? COUNCIL TONIGHT THAT IS FOR YOU TO DECIDE. THANK YOU. MA'AM. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, AMANDA MADDOX, UP ON DECK? JAMES COOK, ADDRESS? FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. AMANDA MADDOX, THREE FIVE, ZERO SIX CLOVER MEADOW DRIVE, GARLAND, TEXAS, 75043. I DO NOT HAVE A SPEECH PREPARED TONIGHT BECAUSE I DIDN'T REALIZE YOU GUYS WERE DOING COMMENTS TONIGHT, SO I'M GOING TO KIND OF WING IT. SO SORRY IN ADVANCE. I DID DO A LITTLE BIT OF LOOKING BACK AT LAST NIGHT'S WORK SESSION, AND THE GOOD DOCTOR FROM MD PATHWAYS STATED THAT THEY SENT OUT 81,000 MAILERS TO ALL GARLAND UTILITY RESIDENTS. I AM A GARLAND UTILITY RESIDENT. I DID NOT RECEIVE A MAILER IN THE NEXT SENTENCE FROM THE WORK SESSION YESTERDAY. HE SAID THAT ABOUT 6% OF PEOPLE HAVE OPTED OUT, AND THUS 95 OR 94% OF PEOPLE HAVE DECIDED TO KEEP THE SERVICE. DO YOU HEAR THE WORD HE USED? DECIDED TO KEEP THE SERVICE? IF YOU DIDN'T GET THE MAILER, HOW DID YOU DECIDE TO KEEP THE SERVICE? SO AT THIS POINT, OBVIOUSLY YOU KNOW MY OPINION ABOUT THE TECHNOLOGY SIDE OF THINGS, IT'S NOT HARD TO DO AN OPT IN ENROLL. NOW. HE OBVIOUSLY IS ABLE TO DO THAT BECAUSE THE TRIAL WAS A TEXT TO JOIN. WHY CAN'T THE REST OF THE SERVICE BE A TEXT TO JOIN? IT'S FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD FROM THE TECHNOLOGY POINT OF VIEW. SO SINCE THERE IS NO OTHER CHOICE, I WOULD LIKE YOU TO ADD IT TO THE BALLOT IF YOU WOULD. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MA'AM. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER? JAMES COOK IS THE FINAL SPEAKER CARD I HAVE, AND I HAVE SIX REGISTERED POSITIONS. MAYOR, WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO READ THEM NOW OR WAIT UNTIL AFTER THE SPEAKER, PLEASE? OKAY. GOOD EVENING. MAYOR. COUNCIL MEMBERS, MY NAME IS JAMES COOK. I LIVE AT 1833 MEADOWVIEW DRIVE HERE IN GARLAND. 75043. I BELIEVE I'M IN DISTRICT THREE. FIRST OFF, I'M IN SUPPORT OF A VOTE IN MAY FOR THIS. I PURCHASED MY HOUSE IN GARLAND SIX YEARS AGO IN MAY, AND I'M ORIGINALLY A CALIFORNIA PERSON. MY FATHER WAS IN THE MILITARY, SO CALIFORNIA WAS THE PLACE WE WENT TO BETWEEN ASSIGNMENTS. MY DAD SERVED ALMOST 35 YEARS. I CHOOSE NOT TO LIVE IN CALIFORNIA. I CHOSE TO LIVE IN TEXAS. I WANT A SMALLER GOVERNMENT AND ONE IN WHICH LISTENS TO ITS PEOPLE. I AM
[01:15:04]
SURPRISED THAT WE'RE EVEN HERE. WHERE THE DISCUSSION ABOUT WHETHER TO ALLOW THE PEOPLE, THE GOVERNMENT, AND I'M TALKING ABOUT THE CITY OF GARLAND, SHOULD NOT BE AN INSURANCE, SHOULD NOT BE A MIDDLEMAN FOR PROVIDING WE HEARD EARLIER FROM SOMEBODY THAT OPERATES A NONPROFIT. THAT'S WHERE WE SHOULD BE LOOKING AT PROVIDE GRANTS FOR THOSE THINGS. I WORK IN HEALTH CARE ON THE IT SIDE, BUT HEALTH CARE. I'M STARTING A BUSINESS IN AI HEALTH CARE BUSINESS THAT WILL HELP HOSPITALS, ESPECIALLY THOSE THAT ARE STRUGGLING, WHICH WILL BRING BACK SOME OF THE MONEY TO THEM. I AM NOT LOOKING AT GARLAND FOR MY BUSINESS PRECISELY BECAUSE OF THIS TYPE OF THING. THE DIFFERENT POLITICS THAT I'VE SEEN AND THE BUSINESS THAT I'M TALKING ABOUT WILL BE BRINGING IN VERY HIGH DOLLAR EMPLOYEES IN BUSINESS, BRINGING BACK MONEY INTO EACH OF THE COMMUNITIES. AND AGAIN, I JUST CAN'T BELIEVE THAT WE'RE EVEN DOING SOMETHING LIKE THIS. BE ONE THING TO HAVE A COMPANY SAY, HEY, WE WANT TO DO THIS.WE WANT TO PROVIDE THIS SERVICE AND LET THE CITY OF GARLAND TO HELP GET OUT THE WORD, BUT NOT FOR IT TO BE PART OF THE UTILITY. AND I CAN TELL YOU, I GET SOME REALLY HIGH UTILITY BILLS I'VE NEVER ONCE GONE THROUGH IN THE ALMOST SIX YEARS AND GONE LINE BY LINE, BECAUSE I TRUSTED THAT EVERYTHING THAT'S ON THAT BILL IS A VALID THING. GUESS WHAT? FROM NOW ON, I DON'T TRUST I WILL GO THROUGH AND I WILL LOOK LINE BY LINE BECAUSE THIS WAS SNUCK IN AND I DON'T KNOW ONE PERSON. AND I'M VERY ACTIVE IN MY CHURCH AND IN MY COMMUNITY. I DO NOT KNOW ONE PERSON THAT'S IN FAVOR OF THIS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU SIR. SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE EXCUSE ME? MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE READ THE CARDS YOU HAVE? YES, SIR. JENNIFER BENZ REGISTERED FOR ITEM SIX. PAUL, DEBRA HAS REGISTERED FOR ITEM SIX.
HEATHER DUBROW HAS REGISTERED FOR ITEM SIX. BRAD TRAYLOR HAS REGISTERED FOR ITEM SIX. ALI TRAYLOR HAS REGISTERED FOR ITEM SIX. JEFF WOODS HAS REGISTERED FOR ITEM SIX. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE. COUNCIL. IT'S UP TO US. OH, PARDON ME ONE MORE. SORRY. DIDN'T SEE YOU BACK THERE. PLEASE COME UP. IF YOU HAVEN'T FILLED OUT A SPEAKER CARD, PLEASE DO SO AFTER YOU SPEAK. OKAY. I'M JUST CHANGING MY POSITION TO SPEAK.
ALL RIGHT. NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. GOOD EVENING EVERYONE, I WOKE UP. SORRY. MY NAME IS JENNIFER VINCE. MY ADDRESS IS 1408 WILDWOOD CIRCLE, 75042 DISTRICT SIX I DID NOT WAKE UP THIS MORNING WITH THE INTENTION TO COME HERE. CERTAINLY DIDN'T HAVE THE INTENTION TO SPEAK, SO. PARDON ME. I'M A LITTLE SHAKY. I DON'T LIKE PUBLIC SPEAKING.
I'M A RELATIVELY NEW GARLAND RESIDENT. I MARRIED MY HUSBAND, LIFELONG THIRD GENERATION GARLAND. I LOVE THIS CITY. I HAVE NEVER HEARD HIM SAY A NEGATIVE WORD UNTIL THIS ISSUE, WHICH IS A LOT. IF YOU KNOW MY HUSBAND, I'M NOT HERE TO DEBATE THE INTENTIONS, THE ORIGINS, THE MERITS, THE BENEFITS, OR EVEN THE EFFICACY. I JUST WANT THE RIGHT TO HAVE A SAY ON THE ISSUE AND VOTE. AND SO I'M ASKING YOU, PLEASE RESTORE MY FAITH IN THE CITY THAT MY HUSBAND LOVES SO MUCH. JUST LET ME HAVE A VOICE IN MAY. I WILL BE HERE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MA'AM. LAST CALL. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? ALL RIGIGHT, COUNSEL, I'LL TURN IT OVER TO YOU. COUNCILMEMBER BASS, YOU'RE FIRST IN THE QUEUE, SIR. THANK YOU. MAYOR, I WANT TO TAKE A MOMENT TO GO BACK TO WHEN MD HEALTH PATHWAYS FIRST CAME TO COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE LAST MARCH. THAT WAS ALMOST A YEAR AGO. I WAS THE CHAIR OF THAT MEETING, AND AT THE TIME, I RAISED WHAT WAS THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM, THE AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT, NOT THE CONCEPT OF TELEHEALTH ITSELF, NOT EVEN THE COST, BUT THE CONCERN THAT ENROLLING RESIDENTS BY DEFAULT INTO A PAID PROGRAM, EVEN WHEN THEY CAN OPT OUT OF, COULD CREATE FEELINGS OF DISTRUST AND LACK OF TRANSPARENCY. SINCE THEN, WE'VE HEARD A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF FEEDBACK FROM THE COMMUNITY SOME IN SUPPORT, SOME OPPOSED, MUCH OF IT ROOTED IN CONCERNS ABOUT THE PROCESS RATHER THAN THE IDEA OF TELEHEALTH. FEEDBACK MATTERS REGARDLESS OF HOW IT'S DELIVERED, BECAUSE IT TELLS US THIS ISSUE HAS GENERATED PUBLIC
[01:20:02]
INTEREST AND HAS RAISED REAL QUESTIONS. MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT DOES PLAY A DIRECT ROLE IN THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELL-BEING OF OUR RESIDENTS. WE ALREADY PROVIDE ESSENTIAL SERVICES ELECTRICITY, WATER, SANITATION, CODE ENFORCEMENT, AND HEALTH INSPECTIONS. WE TAKE THAT RESPONSIBILITY SERIOUSLY. EXPANDING INTO HEALTH CARE RELATED SERVICES IS A SIGNIFICANT STEP, AND ONE THAT SHOULD BE GROUNDED IN TRANSPARENCY AND PUBLIC TRUST, ESPECIALLY WHEN TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION THAT 43% OF OUR POPULACE IS EITHER UNDERINSURED OR UNINSURED. I SUPPORT MOVING FORWARD TONIGHT WITH PLACING THIS DECISION BEFORE THE VOTERS.THIS AFFIRMS THAT WHEN A POLICY CARRIES THIS LEVEL OF COMMUNITY IMPACT, THE FINAL SAY SHOULD REST WITH THE RESIDENTS OF GARLAND. FOR THIS REASON, I ENCOURAGE MY COLLEAGUES TO SUPPORT TAKING THIS TO A VOTE AND ALLOWING OUR CITIZENS TO MAKE THAT CHOICE. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COUNCILMEMBER BASS, A SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM LUCK COUNCIL ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION. MADAM SECRETARY, IF YOU PLEASE, PREPARE THE VOTE FOR US. THIS IS A MOTION TO APPROVE CALLING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION. THAT ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
EVERYONE IS WELCOME TO STICK AROUND FOR OUR ITEMS. FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. MOVE
[a. Hold a public hearing and consider approval of an ordinance adopting the 2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)]
ON NOW TO ITEM NUMBER EIGHT. IT'S HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF OUR 2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. I WILL OPEN UP OUR PUBLIC HEARING. MADAM SECRETARY, DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM? NO, SIR, WE DO NOT. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL RIGHT, COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS, SIR.MR. MAYOR. YES, SIR, I MOVE TO APPROVAL OF THIS ACTION. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE OUR 2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BY COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS. AND I HAVE A SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM LUK. ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT? I SEE NONE. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE VOTE FOR THIS? 2026 CIP BUDGET IS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL. WE'LL MOVE ON.
ACTUALLY, LET'S TAKE A SHORT RECESS HERE BEFORE WE MOVE ON TO OUR OTHER ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. IT IS CURRENTLY 823. I ASK YOU T ALL RIGHT. WELCOME BACK. WE'RE
[b. Consider a request by Lockwood Distilling, requesting approval of a Major Waiver to Chapter 7, Table 7-7 of the Garland Development Code to install an awning sign with 24-inch-tall letters, backlit with internal illumination positioned on top of the awning, where only an awning sign with 8-inch-tall letters, no backlighting, and no internal illumination printed, painted or applied directly on the surface of the sign are permitted on a property zoned Downtown (DT) District, Downtown Historic (DH) sub-district in District 2.]
NOW MOVING ON TO THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS ITEM EIGHT B. IT'S CONSIDER A REQUEST BY LOCKWOOD DISTILLING REQUESTING APPROVAL OF MAJOR WAIVER. CHAPTER SEVEN, TABLE 7-7 TO THE GARLAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO INSTALL AN AWNING SIGN WITH 24 INCH TALL LETTERS, BACKLIT WITH INTERNAL ILLUMINATION, POSITIONED ON TOP OF AN AWNING WHERE ONLY AN AWNING SIGN WITH AN EIGHT INCH TALL LETTERS, NO BACKLIGHTING AND NO INTERNAL ILLUMINATION. PRINTED, PAINTED OR APPLIED DIRECTLY ON THE SURFACE OF THE SIGN ARE PERMITTED ON A PROPERTY ZONED DOWNTOWN DISTRICT DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT IN DISTRICT TWO. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU MAYOR. FOR THE RECORD, ELENA, DIRECTOR OF PNNING AND DEVELOPMENT. I'M NOT GOING TO REPEAT THE WHOLE REQUEST AGAIN. IT'S A MOUTHFUL, BUT THE BASIC THING IS THE THE REQUEST IS FOR A SIGN THAT IS BIGGER THAN WHAT OUR SCIENCE STANDARDS ALLOW AND HAVE ILLUMINATION THAT'S NOT CURRENTLY ALLOWED PER OUR SIGN STANDARDS. SO IT IS LOCATED AT 532 MAIN STREET, SUITE A. THE APPLICANT IS LOCKWOOD DISTILLING. THAT'S THE BUSINESS THAT'S WANTING TO COME IN THERE.IT'S 5000 SQUARE FOOT AND IT'S ZONED IN OUR DOWNTOWN. AND THE SUB DISTRICT IS DOWNTOWN HISTORIC SUB DISTRICT. AS YOU CAN SEE, IT IS LOCATED IN OUR DOWNTOWN AND IS SURROUNDED BY OUR DOWNTOWN, RIGHT NEXT TO OUR SQUARE AND SURROUNDED BY ALL OUR UNIQUE BUSINESSES AND RESTAURANTS. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CALLS THIS AREA OUT FOR COMMUNITY CENTERS. COMMUNITY CENTERS ARE AREAS WITH COMPACT DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARILY NONRESIDENTIAL, SERVING A COLLECTION OF NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS TYPE OF BUSINESSES ARE OBVIOUSLY GREAT FOR COMMUNITY
[01:25:07]
CENTERS DESIGNATION, BUT REMEMBER, THE BUSINESS IS NOT PART OF THE REQUEST. IT'S THE SIGNAGE THAT'S PART OF THE REQUEST HERE. SOME SITE PHOTOS THAT WE HAVE FROM DIFFERENT ANGLES. HERE'S AN EXHIBIT OF THE PROPOSED SIGN. IT IS. IT IS BEING PUT ON TOP OF THE AWNING THAT WE HAVE WITH CHANNEL LETTERS. AND THOSE LETTERS. LOCKWOOD. EACH LETTER WILL BE ILLUMINATED, ILLUMINATED. HERE'S AN EXAMPLE OF THE SIGN THAT THEY'RE WANTING TO PUT IN OUR DOWNTOWN AS WELL. I BELIEVE THIS ONE IS PROBABLY FROM THEIR MCKINNEY LOCATION, AND IT'S GOING TO BE VERY, VERY SIMILAR, IF NOT THE SAME. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS APPROVAL PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION WAS APPROVAL AS WELL. WE SENT OUT 117 LETTERS.WE RECEIVED SIX IN FAVOR, AND WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY IN OPPOSITION. AND WITH THAT, I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. I DO WANT TO KIND OF GO BACK AND TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE REQUEST ITSELF. OUR SCIENCE STANDARDS ALLOW EIGHT INCH SIGN, A BLADE SIGN FOR THAT TYPE OF SCIENCE. AND WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING IS 24 INCH. AND WE DO NOT ALLOW INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGNS AND, AND BACKLIT SIGNS. AND AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE EXAMPLE HERE, THIS IS GOING TO BE ILLUMINATED AND BACKLIT. SO THOSE ARE THE DEVIATIONS THAT THEY'RE REQUESTING. ALL RIGHT. COUNCILMEMBER DUTTON. SORRY WHAT SIZE ARE THESE VERSUS COMPARED TO LIKE DOSE BAND I DON'T KNOW. YEAH. DOSE DOSE WE'LL JUST SAY DOSE. THEY ARE SLIGHTLY 2141 IS DOS BANDERAS. AND THIS IS 24 OKAY. SO IT'S IT'S SMALLER THAN DOS BANDERAS.
AND THEN WE SAY THAT WE DON'T ALLOW BACKLIT BUT WE GOT LIKE THE NEONS RIGHT. BASICALLY EVERYONE SIGNS ARE LIT UP DOWN THERE. IT'S HOW IT'S BEING LIT. SO THERE ARE SOME OTHER WAYS TO GET THEM LIGHT. LIKE YOU COULD HAVE SOME OTHER LIGHTS BEING PROJECTED ON THE LETTERS.
THERE'S SOME OTHER ONES. SO IT'S JUST THAT TYPE OF INTERNAL BACKLIT ILLUMINATION IS NOT PERMITTED R OUR CODE. OKAY. PERFECT. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. DID YOU GET ANY FEEDBACK FROM THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION ON THIS REQUEST? ALL WE GOT ARE SIX LETTERS IN FAVOR. NOTHING IN OPPOSITION, NOTHING. NOTHING IN OPPOSITION. NOTHING OPPOSITION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. COUNCILMEMBER BEARD. I KNOW WE HAVE ALL THESE RULES FOR DOWNTOWN SIGNS AND EVERY BUSINESS THAT COMES THROUGH, WE HAVE TO DO A WAIVER FOR ALL THE DOWNTOWN SIGNS. CORRECT. BUT THOSE WAIVERS MAKE OUR DOWNTOWN SO UNIQUE AND INTERESTING. AND IT'S ACTUALLY BRINGS MORE INTEREST TO OUR DOWNTOWN. SO. I DON'T THIS IS THEIR STANDARD SIGN FOR THEIR OTHER BUSINESSES, RIGHT. THAT THOSE WERE THEIR SIGNS WHEN THEY CAME TO US. IT MAKES SENSE THAT WE WOULD THINK, HEY, THEY'RE GOING TO USE THEIR SAME SIGNAGE WHEN THEY COME HERE TOO. SO. I DON'T REALLY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. I THINK THE SIGN'S BEAUTIFUL. I THINK IT'LL DO. IT'LL ADD TO DOWNTOWN AND BRIGHTEN UP THAT CORNER AND BE AN ADDITION TO WHAT WE NEED. SO THANK YOU. AND TO ADD TO THAT, IN OUR PLANS, WE DO ASK FOR UNIQUE SIGNS. WE DO WANT WALKABLE, PEDESTRIAN THINGS THAT WILL ATTRACT OUR PEDESTRIAN PEOPLE THAT ARE COMING INTO DOWNTOWN. AND THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF HOW THAT CAN BE ACHIEVED. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? AND THEN MADAM SECRETARY, IS THE APPLICANT HERE? YES, SIR. SEAN SAUNDERS AND EVAN BHATT. IF YOU'D LIKE TO COME UP AND SPEAK.
IT'S UP TO YOU. IF YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK OR JUST AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS, IT'S UP TO YOU.
SAUNDERS. HERE WITH THE COMPANY. I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU GUYS. I KNOW WE'VE BEEN HERE A COUPLE TIMES SO FAR, SO I WANT TO THANK YOU ALL FOR WELCOMING US. THIS SIGN IS CERTAINLY ONE.
[01:30:03]
WE HAVE A COUPLE OTHER LOCATIONS. IT'S IN THE HISTORIC, HISTORIC DOWNTOWN MCKINNEY SPOT AS WELL. BEAUTIFUL. BACK LIT IT. IT'S DONE IN A WAY WHERE IT TURNS OFF DURING THE DAY. SO IT IS EFFICIENT. SO IT'S NOT AN OVERUSE OF ANY UTILITIES OR ANYTHING. BUT WE DO THINK I THINK THE COMMENT OF IT ADDING TO THAT CORNER, ADDING A LITTLE BIT OF LIGHT SHOULD HELP. WE HOPE IT ATTRACTS PEOPLE AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO SERVING OUR COMMUNITY. THANK YOU GUYS. ONE SECOND, I GOT A FEW QUESTIONS FOR YOU. MAYOR PRO TEM LOOKED. I LOVE YOUR SIGN. I AM REALLY EXCITED ABOUT YOUR RESTAURANT. WHEN'S IT GOING TO OPEN? WE'RE WAITING ON THE SIGN. ALL RIGHT.VERY SOON. WE WERE IN THERE TODAY. EVAN OVER THERE AND I WERE PUTTING TABLES AND CHAIRS AND PAINTINGS UP AND ALL THAT. SO WE'VE BEEN BUSY. HOPEFULLY VERY SOON, LATER THIS MONTH.
THAT'S GREAT. I GOT A SNEAK PEAK DURING THE CHRISTMAS EVENT ON THE SQUARE, SO I'M SUPER EXCITED. IT LOOKED GREAT THEN. I'M SURE IT LOOKS EVEN BETTER NOW, SO THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBER BASS. SEAN, NO QUESTION FOR YOU. JUST REALLY APPRECIATE YOU AND EVAN BEING PART OF THIS COMMUNITY, BRINGING BRINGING YOUR CONCEPT HERE AND PUTTING THE YOUR FAITH AND TRUST IN US. AND I KNOW THAT OUR CITIZENS WILL WILL RETURN THAT THAT TRUST TO YOU.
THANK YOU. REALLY HAPPY TO HAVE YOU GUYS HERE. COUNCILMAN. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS, GOOD WANTS TO GET IN TOUCH WITH YOU, DO YOU IS YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE, WOULD YOU GIVE US ADDRESSES? FIVE. THREE. TWO. SWEET. A RIGHT THERE ON MAIN STREET. YES, SIR. THANK YOU, THANK YOU.
MAYOR. SIR. COUNCILMEMBER THOMAS SEAN. SO I HAVEN'T BEEN INTO YOUR RESTAURANT, BUT ABOUT A WEEK AGO, I SAID, LET ME JUST. I WAS OVER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, STOPPED IN RICHARDSON. AND SO IF THAT'S THE KIND OF PLACE WE'RE GOING TO GET IN DOWNTOWN GARLAND, AND I THINK WE'RE THE LEAST WE CAN DO IS LET YOU KEEP YOUR BRANDING, BECAUSE THAT THAT SIGN LOOKS VERY NICE ON YOUR RICHARDSON STORE. THE THE LAYOUT IN RICHARDSON I THOUGHT WAS REALLY GOOD. AND SO I'M REALLY LOOKING FORWARD TO HAVING YOU GUYS HERE IN DOWNTOWN. I CERTAINLY APPROVE THIS. WILL VOTE TO APPROVE THIS VARIANCE. THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING GARLAND. THANK YOU COUNCILMAN. WE'RE WORKING ON THAT TAYLOR SWIFT KARAOKE TAYLOR SWIFT KARAOKE NIGHT OKAY.
IF HE DOES THAT, WE MIGHT VOTE TO CENSURE HIM. THAT'S. IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE SPEAKER? THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM SECRETARY. IS THERE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS SIGNED UP FOR THIS ITEM? NO, SIR. COUNCILMEMBER BEARD, THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT. MA'AM, I WHOLEHEARTEDLY MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SIGN VARIANCE AS PRESENTED. I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER RIORDAN, A SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM LUK. ANY DISCUSSION? MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE PREPARE THE VOTE FOR US? MADAM HAS PROVED UNANIMOUSLY. ALL RIGHT, ON TO
[c. Consider a request by ZoneDev, requesting approval of 1) an amendment to Planned Development (PD) District 21-29 to modify sign standards and 2) a Concept Plan for the location of the sign on a property zoned for Multifamily uses. The site is located at 1602 Belt Line Road in District 8.]
OUR NEXT ITEM IS ITEM EIGHT C. CONSIDER A REQUEST BY ZONE DEV REQUESTING APPROVAL OF ONE. AN AMENDMENT TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 2129 TO MODIFY SIGN STANDARDS, AND TWO A CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE LOCATION OF THE SIGN ON A PROPERTY ZONED FOR LTIFAMILY. USES. THE SITE IS LOCATED AT 1602 BELTLINE ROAD IN DISTRICT EIGHT. THANK YOU. MAYOR. AS YOU MENTIONED, THIS IS A REQUEST TO AMEND THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO MODIFY THEIR SIGN STANDARDS. THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IS 21 DASH 29. IT IS THE BASE ZONING IS MULTIFAMILY. NOTHING IS BEING CHANGED IN THE BASE ZONING OR THE PD EXCEPT FOR THE SIGN STANDARD. AS YOU MENTIONED, LOCATED AT 1602 BELTLINE ROAD. IT'S 4.54 ACRES. HERE YOU SEE THE ZONING MAP. AS YOU CAN SEE THE PD, IT'S A RECENT PD 21 DASH 29. THIS PROJECT IS ACTUALLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION, ABOUT TO BE COMPLETED PRETTY SOON. IT IS SURROUNDED BY TO THE TO THE SOUTH. THERE ARE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. TO THE WEST THERE ARE OTHER. THERE'S OTHER MULTIFAMILY TO THE NORTH NORTHWEST THERE, OTHER MULTIFAMILY AS WELL. HOWEVER, IT'S ALSO THERE'S ALSO COMMUNITY RETAIL, ZONING AND COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES TO THE EAST OF THE SITE. SO IT'S TRULY SURROUNDED BY A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT USES RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES CALL THIS AREA OUT FOR COMPACT NEIGHBORHOOD. THESE AREAS PROVIDE TRANSITIONS BETWEEN TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND HIGHER[01:35:01]
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS. IF YOU THINK ABOUT THE USE, THIS PROJECT IS 199 UNITS. I BELIEVE 184 OF IT IS MULTIFAMILY UNITS AND 15 OF IT IS TOWNHOME. SO THE PROJECT ITSELF DOES TRULY FULFILL THE DESIGNATION PER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. HERE THE SITE PHOTO. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE PROJECT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION.IT WENT VERTICAL AND PRETTY PRETTY CLOSE TO BEING COMPLETED. HERE IS THE EXHIBIT WHERE YOU SEE THE RED RECTANGLE. THAT'S WHERE THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A BLADE SIGN. THE.
OUR GDC DOES ALLOW ONE BLADE SIGN PER ENTRANCE. THE SIGN MOFICATIONS THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING IS TO HAVE ONE BLADE SIGN FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT. HOWEVER, THE SIZE OF THE BLADE SIGN THAT THEY'RE REQUESTING EXCEEDS THE GDC REQUIREMENT. AND WE'RE GOING TO GO OVER THAT HERE IN A BIT. HERE YOU CAN SEE WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING. THIS IS WHERE THE BLADE SIGN WILL BE LOCATED AT. THIS IS KIND OF A MORE DETAILING OF THE OF THE SIGN. SO IT IS OUR GDC ALLOWS FOR EIGHT SQUARE FEET. IT IS WAY BIGGER THAN THAT. IT IS 100FT■S. BUT WE DO HAVE OTHER EXAMPLES OF BLADE SIGNS IN THIS URBAN FORM OF MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS THAT ARE BIGGER THAN THAT AS WELL. WE WANTED TO SHOW THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, JUST JUST TO SHOW THAT ALONG BELTLINE 90 SHRUBS ARE REQUIRED, BUT THE APPLICANT NOT AS PART OF THIS REQUEST, BUT AS PART OF THEIR SITE PLAN, THEY WERE PROVIDING 139 SHRUBS, WHICH WILL HELP SOFTEN THE IMPACT OF A OF A LARGE BLADE SIGN. SO AGAIN, THE AMENDMENTS WILL SPECIFY THAT THERE WILL BE A MAXIMUM OF ONE BLADE SIGN FOR THIS ENTIRE PROJECT. THE SIGN AREA OF THE BLADE SIGN WILL NOT EXCEED 100FT■S. THE BLADE SIGN HEIGHT. IT'S NOT THE HEIGHT OF THE SIGN, IT'S WHERE THE SIGN COULD BE PLACED. FROM THE GRADE IT WILL. THE MAXIMUM WOULD BE 20FT, MEASURED FROM THE LOWEST POINT OF THE SIGN TO GRADE. WE DO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. IT DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WE DO BELIEVE THIS TYPE OF SIGN CAN ENHANCE THE URBAN TYPE OF MULTIFAMILY PROJECT THAT WE'RE TRYING TO ENCOURAGE AND PLAN.
COMMISSION ALSO RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. WE SENT OUT 89 LETTERS AND WE DID RECEIVE ONE IN OPPOSITION. THAT'S FROM WITHIN THE NOTIFICATION AREA THAT WAS SENT TO YOU EARLIER TODAY. THE COMMENTS DID SAY THEY DON'T NECESSARILY THINK A BIG SIGN WOULD LOOK GOOD IN THERE, AND THEY BELIEVED IT MAY LOOK UGLY. AND THEY ALSO MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT TRAFFIC, WHICH OBVIOUSLY THE DOES NOT NECESSARILY HAVE MUCH TO DO WITH THE REQUEST FOR THE SIGN. WITH THAT, I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. COUNCILMEMBER DUTTON NABILA, CAN YOU GIVE US KIND OF THE THOUGHT PROCESS OF WHATHY OUR SIGN, LIKE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT BEING 20FT BECAUSE IT IN THE RENDERING IT LOOKS VERY SCALED. YEAH, I MEAN IT LOOKS APPROPRIATE. CORRECT.
AND SO I DIDN'T KNOW IF THERE'S SOME SCIENCE BEHIND THE 20 FOOT. IS THAT COMMON FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT. SO 20 FOOT IS WHERE THE SIGN CAN BE PLACED FROM THE GRADE. THE ACTUAL SIGN AREA ALLOWED IS ACTUALLY EIGHT SQUARE FEET, WHICH IS SO SMALL. AND WHAT THEY'RE HAVING WHICH DOES IN THE RENDERING LOOKS LIKE IT'S UP TO SCALE, IS 100FT, AND IT STILL LOOKS LIKE IT DOESN'T LOOK OUT OF PROPORTION. I CAN'T TELL WHY OUR SIGN STANDARDS HAVE THAT, BUT AS WE MOVE TOWARD MORE URBAN TYPE OF PROJECTS, THAT IS SOMETHING. AS YOU ALL ARE AWARE, WE'RE WORKING ON OUR SCIENCE STANDARDS. THE BLADE SIGNS WEREN'T NECESSARILY A PRIORITY FOR US TO WORK ON, BUT AS THESE KIND OF PROJECTS ARE COMING IN AND WE ARE NOTICING THESE DISCREPANCIES AND SOMETIMES THE LACK OF PRACTICALITY IN OUR STANDARDS, WE'RE LOOKING AT THE WHOLE SIGN STANDARDS HOLISTICALLY. SO YOU'LL BE YOU'LL BE SEEING SOME CHANGES TO THAT. BUT I'M NOT AWARE OF WHY WE HAD EIGHT SQUARE FEET TO BEGIN WITH. THAT'S TINY. IT IS VERY TINY. I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU'D BE ABLE TO READ ANYTHING, BUT THAT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN WHEN IT WAS PUT IN PLACE IN THE GDC. IT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN PUT IN PLACE FOR THESE TYPE OF PROJECTS. IT WAS PROBABLY PUT IN PLACE FOR A ONE STORY RESTAURANT OR SOMETHING LIKE
[01:40:01]
THAT. OKAY, COOL, I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM NABILA, THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION. I'M DEFINITELY IN FAR OF THIS. IT'S IT'S SIZE APPROPRIATE FOR THE PROJECT AND IT'S A. WELL, I'LL SAVE THE REST FOR THE APPLICANT. I KNOW HE'S HERE, SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBER THOMAS. SO I'M LOOKING AT THE RESPONSE LETTER. THE ONE RESPONSE THAT WE GOT WAS AND THEIR THEIR COMMENT WAS THAT THEY DIDN'T WANT TO SIGN, THAT THEY COULD SEE FROM THEIR FRONT WINDOW, BUT IT APPEARS ON THE MAP WHERE THEY ARE, THE SIGNS ON THE OTHER SIDE, THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE COMPLEX, SO THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO SEE THE SIGN AT ALL.THEY MAY BE SAYING ALONG BELTLINE. THEY MAY NOT WANT TO SEE A SIGN OF THAT SIZE, BUT WE DIDN'T REALLY. I'M JUST READING THEIR COMMENT. WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER STUPID SIGN IN VIEW FROM OUR FRONT WINDOW. THAT'S A DIRECT QUOTE FROM THE COMMENT HERE. THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO SEE THIS FROM THEIR FRONT WINDOW. I AGREE, IT'S COMPLETELY ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COMPLEX. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WAS THE CASE. IT IS A LONG BELT LINE ON ONE OF WHERE IT'S BEING PLACED ALONG BELT LINE. EVEN IF YOU'RE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF BELTLINE, YOU'RE NOT REALLY GOING TO SEE IT BECAUSE YOU'RE LOOKING AT IT EDGE ON. NO. IF YOU'RE ON. SO YOU'VE GOT TO BE GOING UP AND DOWN BELTLINE TO EVEN SEE IT AT ALL. IS THAT RIGHT? I MEAN, I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO SEE IT. YEAH. YEAH. I MEAN IF YOU'RE BUT IF YOU'RE DRIVING UP OR EAST OR WEST ON BELTLINE, YOU'LL BE ABLE TO SEE IT FROM THAT ANGLE, BUT NOT IF YOU'RE DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET. CORRECT. BECAUSE YOUR EDGE ON TO THE SIGN. IT'S JUST THE NATURE OF THIS KIND OF A SIGN. OKAY. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MAYOR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS ITEM? MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL THE APPLICANT UP? MAXWELL FISHER.
MR. FISHER, YOU KNOW THE PROCESS. NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE TEN MINUTES FOR A PRESENTATION. MAYOR COUNCIL. MY NAME IS MAXWELL FISHER FOR ZONE TWO, 502 GRANDVIEW DRIVE, RICHARDSON, TEXAS, 75080. REPRESENTING PINNACLE FACILITY ENGINEERING.
ANY OF YOU MAY MAY THIS PROJECT MAY LOOK FAMILIAR JUST FROM VOTING ON IT IN THE PAST OR SEEING IT BEING CONSTRUCTED. IT IS ONE OF THE MORE EXPENSIVE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY, WITH ME DRIVING RENT RATES, PARTICULARLY FOR THIS. THIS AREA OUTSIDE OF FIREWHEEL AND OUTSIDE OF DOWNTOWN AND OTHER AREAS IN THE CITY. IT IS ROUGHLY 202 HUNDRED UNITS.
ELEVAT SERVE, STRUCTURED PARKING. IT'S GOT TONS OF AMENITIES. IT IS A GREAT ASSET FOR THE CITY. THIS SITE IS IT IS MID-BLOCK. IT'S OFF THE HARD CORNER. SO THERE IS EVEN THOUGH THE BUILDING IS FAIRLY LARGE, WE DON'T HAVE QUITE THE VISIBILITY AS YOU WOULD HAVE ON AN INTERSECTION. THE SIGN IS AS YOU HAVE A SIGN LIKE THIS. IT'S NEAR THE FRONT ENTRANCE. IT WOULD JUST DISPLAY MILLENNIUM VILLAGE. IT'S INTERNALLY LIT ALUMINUM SIGN. IT PROJECTS PERPENDICULAR TO THE BUILDING. AS STAFF MENTIONED, IT'S ABOUT 100FT■S. IT'S 25.5FT TALL AND ABOUT FOUR FEET WIDE. THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE IS ABOUT JUST OVER 17FT. STAFF WAS GIVING US UP TO 20FT JUST SO WE HAVE SOME FLEXIBILITY THERE FROM GRADE. ESSENTIALLY IT WILL EXTEND. THIS IS LOOKING AT IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT IT STRAIGHT AWAY FROM BELTLINE, YOU BARELY SEE THE SIGN. IT'S LEFT OF THE CENTER THERE. YOU'RE SEEING OF COURSE THE END OF THE SIGN. YOU CAN SEE HOW TALL IT IS COMPARED TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING. AND HERE IT IS LOOKING IF YOU'RE LOOKING WEST, IF YOU'RE LOOKING DOWN BELTLINE, YOU CAN SEE IT STARTS TO TOWARDS THE TOP OF THE SECOND STORY AND EXTENDS UP TO CLOSE TO THE TOP OF THE FOURTH STORY, BUT WELL BELOW THE PARAPET. AND IT'S ARCHITECTURALLY INTEGRATED WITH THE BUILDING. THE OTHER EXAMPLES IN THE CITY WHERE YOU SEE THIS 190 FIREWALL, CAMPBELL AND LOOKOUT HAS THIS TYPE OF SIGN. SO DOES FIFTH STREET CROSSING. FIFTH STREET CROSSING SIGN IS ACTUALLY A LITTLE LARGER. IT'S ABOUT 120 ISH SQUARE FEET IN SIGN AREA. THERE'S ALSO DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, A RETAIL BUILDING THAT HAD A FIREWALL THAT HAS A SIMILAR SIGN LIKE THIS. WE WOULD ASK THE COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE SIGN. WE THINK IT'S ARCHITECTURALLY INTEGRATED WITH THE BUILDING. IT'LL BE A NICE ASSET. IT PROVIDE GOOD ACCESS, GOOD VISIBILITY TO BOTH PEDESTRIANS AND MOTORISTS TRAVELING DOWN BELTLINE. THERE'S A PRECEDENT FOR THIS IN THE CITY, AND WE'D ASK YOU TO FOLLOW STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION, AND THE PLANNING AND PLANNING COMMISSION'S VOTE WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS HERE. START WITH MAYOR PRO TEM LUCK, MR. FISHER. HELLO. I REALLY LIKE THE SIGN. I THINK IT ARTICULATES WELL WITH THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS ALSO VERY NICE. I'VE DRIVEN BY IT. I LOVE THAT THERE'S A BIG M ON THE TOP OF IT. FOR WHATEVER REASON. SURE. SO I REALLY I REALLY LIKE
[01:45:08]
IT. THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS FORWARD. THANKS. THANK YOU MA'AM. DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM I MAXWELL, THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS REQUEST TO US. I, I LOVE IT. I THINK IT'S REALLY GREAT.IT'S THIS WHOLE PROJECT HAS BEEN JUST A THRILL TO WATCH. I THINK IT'S THE ONLY CRANE PROJECT THAT THERE'S BEEN IN DISTRICT EIGHT IN A LONG, LONG TIME. SO IT'S BEEN NEAT TO SEE.
SO I JUST WANTED TO CONGRATULATE YOU ALL FOR BRINGING THIS ACROSS THE FINISH LINE AND LOOK FORWARD TO IT OPENING. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER BASS. THANK YOU.
I AGREE WITH WHAT EVERYONE ELSE IS SAYING HERE. THIS IS A OUTSTANDING PROJECT AND WE ALL THINK THE SIGN IS A REALLY GREAT ADDITION TO IT AS WELL. BUT I WANTED TO SAY JUST, YOU KNOW, OVER THE PAST THREE TERMS THAT I'VE BEEN HERE, I HAVE SEEN THE QUALITY OF THE PRODUCTS THAT YOU'VE BROUGHT US GETTING BETTER. AND I REALLY LIKE THAT. THE I FEEL THAT BETTER DEVELOPMENTS ARE COMING TO GARLAND, AND I'VE SEEN THAT IN THE PROJECTS THAT YOU BROUGHT TO US OVER THE YEARS. AND, YOU KNOW, I THINK THE WORD IS OUT THAT GARLAND IS A GREAT PLACE TO BE FOR HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMENT. SO I APPRECIATE YOU BEING A PART OF THIS PROCESS. THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE YOUOT HOLDING THE EARLIER PROJECTS. WE ALL LEARN AND GROW TOGETHER. ALL RIGHT. I SEE NO OTHER SPEAKERS. IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE PRESENTER? MADAM SECRETARY, DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM? NO, SIR. ALL RIGHT.
DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM, THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT, SIR. THANK YOU. MR. MAYOR. I'D LIKE TO PROPOSE THAT WE APPROVE THE REQUEST AS PRESENTED. MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM ON A SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER THOMAS. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE ITEM? MADAM SECRETARY, PLEASE PREPARE THE VOTE FOR US.
COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. YEAH. THAT ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. SIR. MOVE ON TO OUR NEXT ITEM
[d. Consider a request by David Najafi, requesting approval of 1) a Specific Use Provision (SUP) to allow a Laundry, Self-Serve (Laundromat) use and 2) a Concept Plan for the Laundry, Self-Serve (Laundromat) use. The site is located at 429 East Interstate 30 Suites 3, 4, and 5 on a property zoned Neighborhood Services (NS) District in District 3.]
IS ITEM EIGHT D CONSIDER A REQUEST BY DAVID NAJAFI REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PROVISION TO ALLOW LAUNDRY, SELF SERVE, LAUNDROMAT USE, AND A CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE LAUNDRY SELF SERVE LAUNDROMAT USE SITE IS LOCATED AT 429 EAST INTERSTATE 30, SUITES THREE, FOUR, AND FIVE ON A PROPERTY ZONED NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES DISTRICT IN DISTRICT THREE.THANK YOU MAYOR. ONCE AGAIN, IT IS A REQUEST FOR AN SCP FOR A LAUNDRY SELF-SERVICE AKA LAUNDROMAT. USE THE PROPERTY ZONED NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES, NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ZONING DISTRICT. THAT USE DOES REQUIRE AN SCP, WHICH IS WHY THEY'RE BEFORE YOU TODAY. AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S LOCATED IN DISTRICT THREE. THE WHOLE SITE IS 3.79 ACRES. WITHIN THAT SITE THERE IS AN EXISTING BUILDING, AND THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO OCCUPY THREE SUITES WITHIN THAT BUILDING TO MAKE IT A LAUNDROMAT. HERE YOU CAN SEE THE ZONING MAP. THIS IS SURROUNDED BY COMMUNITY OFFICE DISTRICT JUST BUT JUST IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST. THERE ARE MULTIPLE MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS GOING ON, MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS HAPPENING, LOTS OF NEW NEW PROJECTS GOING ON. THERE'S ALSO HOTEL, DIFFERENT TYPE OF RESTAURANTS AND OTHER COMMERCIAL FACILITIES IN THE SURROUNDING AREAS. THE SITE IS ACCESSED FROM I-30 AND RONE.
BOTH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES IDENTIFY THIS AREA AS BUSINESS CENTERS, AND BUSINESS CENTERS ARE GENERALLY LOCATED AT INTERSECTIONS OF MAJOR AND OR SECONDARY ARTERIAL STREETS OR SIGNIFICANT TRANSIT AREAS, SO THESE TYPE OF CATEGORIES. WHEN A COMP PLAN ASKS FOR A BUSINESS CENTER, THEY ARE LOOKING TO HAVE MORE ELEVATED USES, THINGS THAT CAN GENERATE MORE JOBS, MORE EMPLOYMENT, OR SOMETHING MORE SIGNIFICANT THAN A LAUNDROMAT, IN OUR OPINION.
HERE ARE SOME OF THE SITE PHOTOS. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE BUILDING IT'S ALREADY THERE.
[01:50:02]
THESE ARE THE THREE VACANT SUITES. THERE ARE SOME OTHER PHOTOS FROM DIFFERENT ANGLES.THIS BUILDING DOES HAVE DOUBLE FRONTAGE,O THAT'S ONE OF THE UNIQUE THINGS ABOUT THIS BUILDING. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, THESE ARE THE SUITES THAT ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING.
THEY HAVE ACCESS FROM I-30 FROM RONE AND ALSO FROM UPTOWN. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE SCP FOR TEN YEAR TIME PERIOD. ACCORDING TO THEM, THAT WILL WORK WELL WITH THE LEASE THAT THEY'RE TAKING WITH THEIR LANDLORD. AS YOU MAY REMEMBER, WE ARE WORKING ON UPDATING THE TIME PERIOD FOR SPS AND BASED ON THE DISCUSSED TIME PERIOD WHICH HASN'T BEEN FORMALLY ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL YET. BUT FOR THESE KIND OF PROJECTS, WHERE THERE IS A BUILDING AND USES GOING INTO AN EXISTING SUITE, WE HAVE DISCUSSED 5 TO 8 YEARS. SO WE ARE TRYING TO KIND OF SOFTLY TRANSITION INTO THAT MINDSET AND THAT TIME PERIOD RECOMMENDATION. SO FOR THIS ONE WE WOULD RECOMMEND 5 TO 10 YEARS. WE DO REALIZE THERE ARE LOTS OF MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS HAPPENING NEARBY. AND THIS TYPE OF USE, THEY CAN FUNCTION WITHIN THE EXISTING ZONING DISTRICT. IT MAY IT PROBABLY DOES HAVE LIMITED OFFSITE IMPACT. HOWEVER, WE ALSO SEE THAT THE LOCATION ALONG A MAJOR ROADWAY, THERE COULD BE OTHER ALTERNATIVE USES, MORE ELEVATED USES THAT MAY ALIGN MORE WITH THE LONG TERM COMP PLAN BUSINESS CENTER DESIGNATION. SO WE COULD SEE KIND OF PROS AND CONS. THERE ARE EMPTY SUITES ON AN EXISTING BUILDING. WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE BUSINESSES GOING IN THERE, BUT WE WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SEE THE RIGHT KIND OF BUSINESSES GOING IN THERE. AND ACCORDING TO THE COMP PLAN, IT'S SUBJECTIVE RIGHT NOW. BUT WE DO THINK FROM STAFF'S PERSPECTIVE, THERE ARE OPPORTUNITIES FOR MORE ELEVATED USES TO GO IN THERE. PLAN COMMISSION DID RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR TIME PERIOD OF TEN YEARS. WE DID SEND OUT 38 RESPONSES ON YOUR THE PACKET THAT YOU GOT, YOU SAW THERE. WE RECEIVED THREE RESPONSES, ONE IN FAVOR FROM WITHIN THE NOTIFICATION AND TWO FROM OUTSIDE OF THE NOTIFICATION AREA. ONE IN FAVOR, ONE IN OPPOSITION. AFTER WE SENT OUT THAT PACKAGE, WE RECEIVED ANOTHER LETTER IN FAVOR FROM WITHIN THE NOTIFICATION AREA.
SO THAT BRINGS A TOTAL OF RESPONSES RECEIVED. AS FOR ONE OF THE LETTERS THAT ARE FROM OUT, THAT IS OUTSIDE, THAT IS FROM OUTSIDE OF THE NOTIFICATION AREA THAT IS IN OPPOSITION, THEY DID SAY THAT THEY DON'T NECESSARILY SEE A LAUNDROMAT BEING APPROPRIATE THERE. WITH THAT, I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF ON THIS ITEM? MAYOR PRO TEM LUCK. WHAT OTHER KIND OF USES COULD YOU SEE THERE? AGAIN, IT'S SUBJECTIVE. IT IS A IT IS A REALLY ATTRACTIVE BUILDING IN OUR OPINION. IT HAS DOUBLE FRONTAGE. THERE ARE THERE'S ALREADY A DONUT SHOP. THERE IS A I BELIEVE THERE'S A SALON THERE. THERE ARE A COUPLE DOCTORS OFFICE. I FEEL LIKE OTHER USES THAT ARE MORE ALIGNED WITH WHAT'S ALREADY THERE, MAYBE A COUPLE MORE OFFICES, MAYBE A RESTAURANT, MAYBE A FINE DINING STAFF DOES FEEL LIKE ONCE A LAUNDROMAT IS THERE AND IT'S OCCUPYING THREE SUITES, IT MAY BE HARDER FOR THE LANDLORD TO ATTRACT A FINE DINING RESTAURANT OR MORE A MORE HIGHER END RETAIL FOR THAT LOCATION. BUT AGAIN, ON THESE KIND OF SITUATIONS, WE CAN SEE PROS AND CONS OFOF THE REQUEST I AGREE.HANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. HELLO. GOOD EVENING. ONE QUESTION IS THIS A DROP OFF OR DO IT YOURSEL OR THEY DO IT AND AND HAND IT TO THE CUSTOMER.
SO THE APPLICANT WILL SPEAK ABOUT THE OPERATIONAL SIDE OF IT. BUT PER OUR DEFINITION IT'S SELF-SERVICE THAT WAY. IT'S YES, LAUNDRY SELF-SERVICE, WHICH IS THE DEFINITION THAT THEY'RE BEING CLASSIFIED AS, MEANING PEOPLE ARE GOING TO DO IT BY THEMSELVES. BUT ACCORDING TO THE APPLICANT, THEY WILL BE FULLY STAFFED. BUT THAT'S AN OPERATIONAL MATTER THAT DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE LAND USE. OKAY, I'LL WAIT FOR THAT. AWESOME. THANKS, SIR.
COUNCILMEMBER DUTTON. DO YOU KNOW WHEN THESE WHEN THAT BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED, THIS WAS I BELIEVE THE PERMIT WAS THEY GOT THEY GOT THE PERMIT AROUND WHEN THE GDC WAS BEING UPDATED AROUND 20 1415 AROUND THAT TIME. SO YES, THERE HAS BEEN SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT
[01:55:04]
PART OF GDC APPLIES TO THEM AND WHAT PART OF GDC DOES NOT. BUT FOR THE USE PERSPECTIVE, IT ALL APPLIES THE TWO DAYS GDC APPLIES. BUT YES, IT'S AROUND 2015, 16 AROUND THAT TIME. SO DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE VACANCY PERCENTAGE IS IN THAT? I DO NOT KNOW THAT, BUT I DO KNOW THERE ARE SEVERAL SUITES THAT ARE VACANT IN THAT BUILDING. YEAH, I, HAVE ACTUALLY DROVE PAST THAT LOCATION QUITE A BIT, ODDLY, BECAUSE I DON'T GO DOWN THAT WAY. BUT I'VE NOTICED THAT THERE IS A LOT THERE IS A THERE ARE A LOT OF SUITES. SO THAT'S WHERE SOMETIMES FOR A LONG TIME ASIAN COMES IN. LIKE, DO WE WANT TO SEE THOSE SUITES BEING OCCUPIED WITH SOME USES, OR DO WE WANT THE RIGHT KIND OF USES? THAT'S THE QUESTION BEFORE COUNCIL TONIGHT. SURE. OKAY. I THANK YOU. THANK YOU MAYOR PRO TEM LUCK. THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME CHIME IN AGAIN. WHAT USES ARE DO NOT REQUIRE AN SUP IN ORDER TO BE HERE. THEY CAN DO DENTIST OFFICE OR REGULAR OFFICE, GENERAL OFFICE, RESTAURANT. THEY ALREADY GOT AN SUP FOR US. SO LONG. SO THAT ONE'S WELL. NO, I DON'T THINK SALON IS PERMITTED RIGHT NOW. THERE. SO THOSE TYPE OF USES WILL BE PERMITTED BY RIGHT. SO PHILOSOPHICALLY AN SUP BECOMES PART OF A. A ZONING GUIDELINE FOR USES THAT. CITY COUNCIL, CITY STAFF, PEOPLE FROM YEARS AGO DECIDED THAT MAYBE WE NEED TO REALLY TAKE A HARD LOOK AT SOMETHING. RIGHT. SO WE'RE GOING TO REQUIRE AN SUP BECAUSE THESE USES MAY NOT ALIGN WITH WHAT WE INTEND FOR THIS AREA, DEPENDING ON THE LOCATION.CORRECT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MA'AM. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF ON THIS ITEM? MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL THE APPLICANT? FAYE BAKER? ALL RIGHT. IF YOU GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE TEN MINUTES TO GIVE A PRESENTATION. MY ADDRESS? OKAY.
JUST BUSINESS ADDRESS WORKS AS WELL. 3225 TURTLE CREEK BOULEVARD, DALLAS, TEXAS. THANK YOU GUYS FOR LETTING US COME IN HERE AND PRESENT. I KNOW THE TRADITIONAL WHEN THEY SAY SELF-SERVICE LAUNDROMATS, IT KIND OF GIVES THAT IMPRESSION THAT, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE ARE JUST GOING IN AND OUT ON THEIR OWN. IT'S NOT LIKE THAT ANYMORE. THEY'RE THEY'RE HIGH TECH, ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY. I JUST I FEEL LIKE IT'S MISLED BY THIS WHOLE SELF-SERVE. IT'S 100% ALWAYS GOING TO HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE ON STAFF. THERE'S ALWAYS GOING TO BE AN AREA FOR LIKE CHILDREN, FAMILY, YOU KNOW, LIKE A WI FI AREA SITTING IN A PLAY AREA FOR THE KIDS. SO IT'S NOT REALLY JUST A SELF-SERVE. SO I FEEL LIKE IT'LL BE A NICE FIT. THERE'S A LOT OF APARTMENT COMPLEXES, PEOPLE WITH THE NEED TO COME IN AND DO LARGE AMOUNTS OF LAUNDRY AT ONE TIME VERSUS, YOU KNOW, ONE LOAD AT A TIME AT HOME. SO, YOU KNOW, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. YOU MAY HAVE. GOOD COUNSEL. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I DO HEAR COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS START WITH YOU, SIR. WHEN YOU SAY GOOD EVENING, WHEN YOU SAY, CAN YOU GIVE US A LAYOUT AND YOU HAVEOW MANY APPROXIMATELY HOW MANY STAFF PERSONS ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE? AND WILL THEY BE DOING LAUNDRY FOR PEOPLE WHO BRING THEIR LAUNDRY THERE? SURE.
AND THERE IS A SERVICE OF FLUFF AND FOLD. THERE WILL BE. YES, THEY WILL BE DOING THEY CAN DO DROP OFF SERVICE. CORRECT. DROP OFF AND PICK UP. CORRECT. AND THERE WILL BE A SERVICE. SO YOU GIVE THEM, THEY'LL PICK UP A TICKET. SURE. YEAH. IT'S LIKE A IT'S A POS SYSTEM. THEY'LL PUT THEIR NAME IN THERE. YOU KNOW THEIR TAG NUMBER. IT'S KIND OF LIKE THE LIKE THE DRY CLEANING.
OKAY OKAY OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. COUNCILMEMBER BEARD OKAY, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I'M CLEAR, BECAUSE THERE'S A LAUNDROMAT AROUND THE CORNER FROM ME. IT'S GOT A CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA. IT'S GOT A COUPLE OF VIDEO GAMES. IT'S GOT TABLES THAT YOU CAN SIT AND READ. IT'S GOT A COUPLE OF TVS ON THE WALL. HAS LITTLE PURCHASE AREA IN THE BACK WHERE YOU CAN BUY LAUNDRY.
IS THAT WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT? SO AND THEY DO OFFER A DROP OFF SERVICE AS WELL AS I CAN GO IN AND WASH MY OWN TEN LOADS OF LAUNDRY ALL AT ONE TIME. RIGHT. DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY APARTMENT COMPLEXES ARE MULTIFAMILY OR AROUND YOU? THERE'S. YEAH, ON ROMAN ROAD,
[02:00:06]
THERE'S TONS OF APARTMENTS ON THAT. AS A FORMER APARTMENT PERSON, I DO KNOW THAT A LAUNDROMAT NEARBY IS VERY, VERY IMPORTANT AT TIMES BECAUSE WE ALL HAVE WASHING. IF WE DO EVEN HAVE A WASHING MACHINE, THEY DO GO OUT. SO YOU DO NEED TO HAVE. OKAY, SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS, SEE IF IT WAS A SIMILAR LAYOUT BECAUSE THE ONE I HAVE THAT MY HOUSE IS VERY NICE. YES, THEY'RE VERY MODERN, HIGH TECH, I MEAN ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY, CONSUMER FRIENDLY. IT REALLY IS.IT'S A NICE ATMOSPHERE. IT'S NOT THE OLD SCHOOL KIND OF SELF-SERVICE. OKAY. I JUST MAKING SURE I UNDERSTOOD THE LAYOUT. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBER MOORE. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. COUNCIL, THIS IS ONE OF THOSE TIMES WHEN WE COME BEFORE YOU. WITH A PROJECT THAT. AS YOU HAVE HEARD 2 OR 3 OTHER PROJECTS AND WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THEM, VERY EXCITING. THE SIGNS AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. WE'RE TALKING NOW, THOUGH, ABOUT A FRONTAGE ROAD.
I 30 AND FOR HOW MANY YEARS NOW, HOW MANY YEARS YOU SAID 2015. CORRECT. THAT WAS WHEN THE INITIAL BUILD OUT WE'RE TALKING NOW 20 1520. WE'RE TALKING 11 YEARS ON THE OTHER SIDE. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT I WOULD TRULY LIKE TO SEE. I TRULY LIKE TO SEE THIS AREA BE MORE UPSCALE.
I WOULD REALLY LIKE TO SEE IT, HAVE A NICE RESTAURANT, A LITTLE FAST FOOD OR SOMETHING, SOMETHING AS YOU'RE DRIVING DOWN 30 AND YOU LOOK TO YOUR LEFT AND TO YOUR RIGHT, THE ESTHETICS ARE SUCH THAT THEY DRAW YOU IN. BUT AS I HAVE STATED IN THE PAST, THIS AREA TRULY HAS TAKEN ON A LIFE OF ITS OWN. AND WHAT I MEAN BY THAT IS RIGHT NEXT TO MATTER OF FACT, I'M GOING TO ASK YOU SOME QUESTIONS HERE, AND AS YOU ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS, WE'LL GIVE COUNCIL AN OPPORTUNITY TO KIND OF GET AN IDEA OF WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. TELL ME ABOUT THE OTHER ESTABLISHMENTS, THE OTHER BUSINESSES THAT ARE PRESENTLY THERE AND IF YOU WILL, CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE BUILDING? I'D LIKE FOR THE BUILDINGS AS WE LOOK. OH. THIS ONE. YES. NO, NO NO NO, THE OTHER ONE. THE ACTUAL BUILDINGS. OH, YES. THERE YOU GO, THERE YOU GO. AND AS YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE BUILDING STRUCTURE. BEAUTIFUL STRUCTURE, BEAUTIFUL BUILDING FRONTAGE, AS YOU'RE GOING DOWN I-30, YOU'RE GOING TO LOOK OVER THERE AND YOU'RE GOING TO SEE IT'S SOMETHING THAT I FEEL RIGHT NOW WOULD DRAW YOU IN. HOWEVER, A WASHETERIA A LAUNDROMAT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT NORMALLY DRAWS PEOPLE IN. AND I THINK THAT WE'VE ALRDY STATED THAT ONCE THEY'RE IN, PROBABLY THAT'S GOING TO BE THE USE. AND IT DOES CONCERN ME THAT WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO DRAW AND ATTRACT A TYPE OF OTHER BUSINESSES THAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR IN THAT AREA. AT THE SAME TIME. AGAIN, THE AREA IS TAKING ON ITS OWN COMPLEXION, AND I THINK RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM THERE, THERE IS A NEW HOTEL MOTEL BEING BUILT THERE, THE JACK IN THE BOX, THERE'S A CONVENIENCE STORE AND LOTS OF APARTMENTS, LOTS OF MULTIFAMILY APARTMENTS AROUND IT. ACROSS THE STREET THERE IS THE WICKED WINGS. THERE'S THE STATION, THERE'S THE THE CAR WASH. IN OTHER WORDS, IT IS TAKING ON A LIFE THAT I CAN SEE THAT. OKAY, THIS MAY NOT BE EXACTLY WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR WHEN WE LOOKED AT THE ENVISION GARLAND, AND WHEN WE LOOKED AT THE I-30 CATALYST STUDY. BUT I DO SEE THAT THIS BUSINESS HAS BEEN HERE FOR A WHILE. AND THIS LANDLORD, THIS OWNER HAS BEEN HOLDING. YOU MAY EVEN RECALL THEY CAME BEFORE US SEVERAL MONTHS BACK WHERE WE ACTUALLY DID NOT APPROVE OF A WASHETERIA THAT THEY WANTED TO PUT THEIR. AND SO AS I LOOK AT IT, I CAN SIT AROUND AND WAIT FOR A VENDOR OR WAIT FOR A BUSINESS TO COME IN. THAT MIGHT BE MORE APROPOS. OR I CAN GO AHEAD AND ASK COUNCIL TO APPROVE THIS, SUCH THAT THIS LANDLORD CAN BEGIN TO FILL IT UP. BECAUSE ONE THING ABOUT IT, IF IT'S NOT PEOPLE IN THERE, HE'S NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO ATTRACT OTHER BUSINESSES EITHER. SO I'VE SAID ALL THAT JUST TO SAY TO YOU THAT WE HAVE TRULY STRUGGLED WITH MAKING A DECISION ON HOW WE WANT TO GO FORWARD WITH THIS, BUT IF THERE ARE NO OTHER QUESTIONS, I WILL AT THIS POINT MAKE A RECOMMENDATION, MAKE A MOTION. I AM GOING TO ASK IF
[02:05:03]
THERE'S ANY OTHER SPEAKERS FIRST. WE GET THERE, SIR, AND WE HAVE A FEW MORE IN THE QUEUE.QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. WAIT ONE SECOND, COUNCILMEMBER DUTTON. SO IN THIS PHOTO WE CAN SEE THERE'S A DONUT SHOP, A NAIL SHOP, ONE OF THE RESPONSES ON THE ZONING REQUEST SAID THERE WAS A CASINO CONVENIENCE STORE. WHAT WHAT OTHER BUSINESSES DO YOU HAVE IN YOUR BUILDING? THIS IS MR. NAJAFI OWNS THE BUILDING. THERE IS A CONVENIENCE STORE. ACTUAL C STORE. THERE IS NO CASINO THAT I KNOW OF. STORE IT. IT HAS A MEDICAL PLACE ON THE CORNER SALON COMING SOON AND A DONUT SHOP. AND THEN WHAT ELSE IS THERE? IS THE WELLNESS. AND THEN EVERYTHING ELSE HAS BEEN VACANT. THINK OF. SO THIS BUILDING WAS BUILT JUST TO LET YOU KNOW. OF COURSE, THE IDENTICAL TWO FACADES. SO THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE ARE COMING IN FROM ROWAN ROAD. SO IT DOES GIVE THE IMPRESSION THAT EVERYBODY'S CONCERNED ABOUT THE HIGHWAY IMAGE. AND REALLY EVERYONE'S ACCESSING FROM THE HOUSING AREA. SO I'M NOT SURE IF THAT HELPS A LITTLE BIT. YEAH. I MEAN, IF YOU GO ON GOOGLE AND YOU TRY TO DO LIKE THE GOOGLE IMAGE, IT DOESN'T GIVE YOU A WHOLE LOT BECAUSE IT'S FOUR YEARS OLD. SO. I THINK THAT IT'S ALSO IMPORTANT THAT WE KIND OF KEEP IN MIND WHAT'S ALREADY THERE, BECAUSE IT IS ALREADY SETTING THE TONE. THE BUILDING RIGHT NEXT DOOR BEHIND THIS IS A DOLLAR GENERAL.
SO THEN YOU'VE GOT DONUTS AND NAIL SPA. NAIL SALON. DO YOU KNOW WHERE THE CLOSEST LAUNDROMAT TO THIS LOCATION WOULD BE? YEAH, TOWARDS BELTLINE. THANK YOU. MAYOR PRO TEM LUCK. I THINK THE I'M NOT A FAN OF LAUNDROMATS. NO MATTER WHAT'S IN THEM. I THINK THE ONLY REASON THAT THIS MAKES SENSE IS BECAUSE IT'S SURROUNDED BY MULTIFAMILY. THAT.
MAKES IT BETTER, I GUESS. DO YOU HAVE OTHER LAUNDROMATS? DO YOU OPERATE? THIS IS YOUR FIRST ONE WE HAVE IN FLORIDA. THIS WILL BE THE FIRST. HOW MANY DO YOU HAVE IN FLORIDA? TWO.
WHAT'S NEXT DOOR TO THEM? WELL, TWO OF THEM ARE NOT RELEVANT TO THIS CASE, BUT THEY ARE FREESTANDING BUILDINGS. OKAY. YEAH. I MEAN, FOR AN AREA THAT HAS SO MANY MULTIFAMILY UNITS, IT DOES MAKE SENSE, EVEN THOUGH I KNOW THAT MOST APARTMENTS HAVE THEIR OWN UNITS INSIDE.
BUT I GUESS, YEAH, THEY GO OUT. THEY DO. A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE WORKING SO MUCH, THEY COME IN AND THEY DO ALL THEIR LAUNDRY ON ONE DAY. YOU KNOW, ONE TIME THEY'LL PUT IN 5 TO 10 UNITS AND GO. THEY DON'T STAY ALL DAY ON THEIR DAY OFF TO DO LAUNDRY. IT'S JUST KIND OF THE, YOU KNOW, YEAH, THAT WOULD BE THE ONLY REASON THAT I WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF IT IS BECAUSE OF THE MULTIFAMILIES THAT ARE SO CLOSE. OTHERWISE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM, MAYOR.
WELL, WITH THIS LAUNDRY LAUNDROMAT, DO YOU EXPECT TO HAVE ANY OTHER ANCILLARY BUSINESSES WITH IT, LIKE CONVENIENCE ITEMS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT WILL BE LIKE. YOU MEAN LIKE THE SNACK AREA AND ITEMS PURCHASED FOR THE LAUNDRY? BEYOND TT, SOMETIMES YOU SEE THAT WITH WITH AGING LAUNDRY MATS WHERE THEY START TO LOSE A LITTLE BIT OF THEIR THEIR LOSS AND THEY AND PEOPLE START ADDING A LOT OF THINGS IN THERE TO TRY. AND IT'S REALLY EFFICIENT, VERY CLEAN LINE CENTER. I MEAN, I JUST I DON'T SEE ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE RECEPTION AREA TYPE LOBBY SELLING A FEW ITEMS. OKAY. I HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY. IS IT POSSIBLE TO RESTRICT? AN SUV TO LAUNDRY AND LAUNDRY RELATED ITEMS? AS A SO WHAT ITEMS ARE YOU TRYING TO RESTRICT, LIKE RETAIL ITEMS? TRYING TO MAKE IT WHERE YOU DON'T, WHERE WE DON'T HAVE A THRIFT STORE SUDDENLY WITHIN IT, OR A OR A CONVENIENCE STORE.
THAT OR A TOBACCO AND A VAPE SHOP THAT SUDDENLY POPS UP INSIDE OF A LAUNDROMAT DOWN THE
[02:10:06]
ROAD. Y CAN, BECAUSE IT'S AN SUV. YOU HAVE SOME MORE FLEXIBILITY IN WHAT YOU WHAT ACTIVITIES YOU ALLOW ON, ON THE ACTUAL LOCATION. SO YOU COULD CERTAINLY PUT IN A CONDITION OF EXPERTISE WITH RESTRICTIONS ON WHAT CAN BE SOLD. OKAY. AND THAT COULD BE COULD THE LANGUAGE BE DETERMINED AFTER OUR SUV? WHAT I'M THINKING IS IF WE IF THIS IS TO GO FORWARD, A RECOMMENDATION THAT I WOULD HAVE WOULD BE TO HAVE IT RESTRICTED TO. YES, THEY NEED TO SELL SOAPS AND TOWELS AND ALL THE TYPICAL THINGS THAT COUNCIL GIVES ME DIRECTION. IT COMES BACK A SECOND TIME BECAUSE IT'S A ZONING CASE. FOR THE SECOND TIME IN TWO WEEKS.BETWEEN NOW AND THEN, I CAN AMEND THE LANGUAGE TO REFLECT WHAT THE COUNCIL'S DESIRE. OKAY, WELL, THAT WOULD BE MY RECOMMENDATION FOR TO PROTECT THIS FROM FUTURE CHANGES, THAT SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE AGREEABLE. OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I NEED TO PUNCH IN AGAIN, SIR. COUNCILMEMBER MOORE. OKAY. THAT DISCUSSION THAT YOU ALL HAD WAS KIND OF BETWEEN THE TWO OF YOU. CAN YOU GIVE ME WHAT IT IS THAT YOU'RE DOING THERE? COUNCILMAN OTT REQUESTED THAT HE WOULD RECOMMEND AND ASK THAT THE COUNCIL ADD A PROVISION IN THE CP, A RESTRICTION THAT CP THAT IT'S NOT THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER, THE BUSINESS OWNER, CANNOT SELL RETAIL GOODS EXCEPT FOR THOSE THAT ARE ACCESSORY TO THE LAUNDRY BUSINESS. THERE ARE PRECEDENTS. IN OTHER WORDS, HAVE WE SEEN THIS HAPPENING SOMEPLACE THAT WE NEED TO IMPOSE THAT TYPE OF RESTRICTION ON THIS PARTICULAR BUSINESS? GO TO SOME OF THE AGING LAUNDROMATS I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT TODAY. I'M CERTAIN FROM MY PLANNING COMMISSION DAYS, WE ARE WE ARE GIVING A CP THAT GOES WITH THE LAND, NOT WITH THE OPERATOR. AND SO IF THEY SELL THIS BUSINESS IN THREE YEARS AND SOMEONE COMES IN THERE AND DECIDES THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AN ACCESSORY VAPE SHOP AT THE SAME TIME, THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.
OKAY. YEAH, RIGHT. I CAN SEE THAT I WOULDN'T WANT THAT TYPE OF USE. BUT AGAIN, I JUST I'M THINKING ABOUT OTHER BUSINESSES, OTHER AREAS. IS THAT GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT WE'RE GOING TO BEGIN TO ESTABLISH AS A PRECEDENT FOR WASHETERIA? FROM MYSELF, YES. ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE SPEAKER? MADAM SECRETARY, DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS SIGNED UP THIS ITEM? YES, SIR. WE HAVE TWO. ALL RIGHT. WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR FIRST SPEAKER, STEPHEN J. SMITH? GOOD EVENING. STEPHEN JOHN SMITH. 5525 LIONS ROAD, ARLINGTON, TEXAS. THANKS FOR Y'ALL'S SERVICE. I'VE BEEN IN GARLAND FOR 46 YEARS AND I'VE LOVED IT.
RAISED MY FAMILY HERE AND MY BOY WENT TO SCHOOL HERE AND NOW HE'S OFF TO MEDICAL STUFF. BUT TONIGHT WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE I-30 CORRIDOR. I KNOW A LITTLE BIT ABOUT IT. ABOUT 6.3 ACRES OF IT ABOUT 27 YEARS AGO. OKAY. AND I'VE WATCHED US TURN DOWN USES FOR THAT LONG.
FOR 30 YEARS I'VE SEEN IT. WE WANT IT. PAPPADEAUX. THEY DIDN'T COME. WE WANTED OTHER SIT DOWN RESTAURANTS. NONE OF THEM CAME, WERE OUTSIDE OF THEIR SERVICE AREA, AND WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET THEM. WE HAVEN'T GOT THEM AND THEY'RE NOT COMING. SO WHAT I'VE HAD OUT THERE IS JUST EMPTY LAND. SOME OF THE CHEAPEST FREEWAY LAND AND ALL OF DALLAS FORT WORTH STILL THERE TODAY, SOME OF IT EMPTY. AND I GOT A NEIGHBOR THAT BUILT A NICE BUILDING RIGHT ACROSS THE HIGHWAY, ABOUT 70% EMPTY, I THINK. BUT HE'S HANGING IN THERE AND IT'S A IT'S A IT'S A NEIGHBOR SERVICE BUILDING. THAT'S WHAT IT'S FOR, FOR SERVICES THAT WE NEED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND WE'VE APPROVED. NOW I'VE GOT THREE GAS STATIONS. I ONLY NEED ONE, BUT I GOT THREE, WHICH IS GOOD COMPETITION. AND I'M NOT TRYING TO BE CYNICAL. I JUST IT'S JUST A SHOCKING TO ME THAT WE BUILT A NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE AND WE
[02:15:08]
BUILT APARTMENTS, WHICH ARE GREAT, BUT NOW WE HAVE A LAUNDROMAT AND IT'S A SERVICE THAT WE NEED OUT THERE. GUYS, I'VE BEEN THERE 27 YEARS AND WE HAVE TO COME WAY ALL ALONG IN THE BROADWAY OR WHATEVER TO GET ONE. AND EVEN WE HAVE WASHERS AND DRYERS, BUT SOME OF THEM, YOU WANT TO WASH YOUR BLANKETS AND STUFF LIKE THAT, OR YOU'RE IN A HURRY. YOU WANT TO DROP IT OFF AND GET IT FOLDED. AND I UNDERSTAND WE'D NOTHING. I'D LOVE. WE HAD EVERYTHING THAT WE WANTED THERE. AND WAY BACK BEFORE YOU GUYS WERE SITTING HERE, I THINK WE SPENT ABOUT $2 MILLION FOR THE BEST LAND USE IN THE I-30 CORRIDOR. AND AND THEY CAME UP WITH ALL THESE GREAT IDEAS OF WHAT WE'RE GOING TO GET. WE DID NOT GET IT. WE'VE SOLD IT OFF FOR $2 A SQUARE FOOT OVER THE YEARS. AND I'M JUST SHARING WITH YOU BECAUSE I LOVE GARLAND AND I LOVE EVERYTHING WE'RE DOING. AND IF WE DON'T THINK IT WORKS, WALK THROUGH DOWNTOWN AND WALK THROUGH ALL THE GREAT THINGS THAT THE LEADERSHIP OF GARLAND HAS DONE. IT'S AMAZING. IT'S AMAZING. BUT OUT IN THE I-30 CORRIDOR, IT'S BEEN THE LOST MAKING OUT THERE BECAUSE WE JUST KEEP HOLDING OFF FOR THINGS THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET. AND SO I'M JUST HOPING WE CAN VOTE, PUT A GOOD BUSINESS, PUT IT IN THERE, SERVE THE COMMUNITY. AND SOMEDAY WHEN SOMEBODY WANTS IT, THEY'LL COME TAKE IT. UNTIL THEN, IT'S SITTING EMPTY. AND BUT I WANT MOST OF ALL THANK YOU GUYS BECAUSE GARLAND HAS BEEN A GREAT PLACE TO LIVE. I'VE BEEN HERE 46 YEARS. I'VE LOVED EVERY YEAR OF IT. AND I APPRECIATE WHAT YOU GUYS ARE DOING. THANK YOU. ONE SECOND. SIR, I HAVE QUESTIONS FOR YOU. MAYOR PRO TEM LUCK. THANK YOU FOR COMING UP TO SPEAK. YES. SO DO YOU THINK THAT THE BOND PROGRAM THAT WAS PASSED IN MAY 2025, WHERE WE WILL BE INFUSING OVER 3 MILLION. WHERE WE WILL BE INFUSING OVER $30 MILLION INTO THAT PARTICULAR AREA, DO YOU THINK THAT THAT MAY HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE LAND IN THE FUTURE? SURE. AND THAT LAND STILL THERE, BUT RIGHT NOW WE'VE GOT AN EMPTY BUILDING, MR. MAYOR, I'M NOT SURE. I JUST CAN'T FIND THE CONNECT. I DID LISTEN, I REALLY TRIED TO FIND THE CONNECTION. I JUST CAN'T SEE THE CONNECTION IN THIS CASE. IN THAT PARTICULAR QUESTION.RIGHT. I GUESS THE POINT IS, IF THERE'S CONCERN ABOUT THE QUALITY OF BUSINESS THAT WOULD BE GOING IN AS A LAUNDROMAT, DO YOU THINK THAT THERE'S HOPE OF BETTER IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE OF MONEY THAT MAY BE INFUSED INTO THE AREA? IS THAT BETTER? WELL, MA'AM, I'M GOING TO TELL YOU, I DON'T SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE LAUNDROMAT. OKAY? SOME PEOPLE SAY GARLAND IS BLUE COLLAR AND I'M BLUE COLLAR. AND I PUT TWO DOCTORS THROUGH SCHOOL WORKING HARD. I DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH A LAUNDROMAT OR A PLACE THAT FIXES A CAR. AND SO WE'RE NOT FRISCO, AND I DON'T WANT TO BE. WE'RE GARLAND, TEXAS. WE ALL WORK HARD IN GARLAND, SO I DON'T HAVE THAT PROBLEM WITH THE LAUNDROMAT. THAT'S A SERVICE WE USE, AND WE'VE HAD AN ABUNDANCE OF SOME CLOSING DOWN AND SOME OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS, BUT WE'RE CREATING OUT HERE VIBRANT LIVE NEIGHBORHOOD WITH MORE UNITS COMING ONLINE, TOUCHING MY PROPERTY LINE THAT HAVE BEEN CHANGED OVER NOW TO MULTIFAMILY. SO NOW WE HAVAVE MORE PEOPLE OUT THERE NEEDING THE SERVICE, SO I DON'T FIND IT DISTASTEFUL OR ANYTHING. I JUST THINK IT'S IT'S A NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE THAT'S NEEDED. AND AND THAT CORNER, IF WE GO OUT THERE, THERE'S WE'VE DROPPED A LOT OF UNITS IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS RIGHT THERE ON THAT CORNER AT BOBTOWN AND I-30. AND WE'RE DROPPING MORE, MORE MULTIFAMILY UNITS. SO THE CUSTOMER BASE IS THERE ALSO. BUT BUT I'M JUST MORE INTERESTED IN THAT. THERE'S A USE THAT'S NEEDED BUILDINGS EMPTY. AND YOU KNOW, WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET WE'RE NOT GOING TO ATTRACT A SIT DOWN RESTAURANT IN AN IN-LINE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE. THEY DON'T WANT TO BE THERE. THTHEY WANT TO BE OUT FRONT. SO I JUST FEEL LIKE IF WE PASS ON THESE OPPORTUNITIES, THEN WE'RE I'VE BEEN SEEING IT PASSED ON FOR ALMOST THREE DECADES, AND WE CAN GO OUT THERE AND LOOK AT THE EMPTY LAND STILL THERE. BUT THEN WE HAVE AN INVESTOR THAT BUILT A BUILDING, AND NOW WE'RE LETTING HIM SUFFER BECAUSE WE STILL DON'T LIKE WHAT'S COMING. EVENTUALLY WE GOT TO TAKE IT.
IT'S JUST MY TAKE ON THE DEAL. I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM. YEAH, AND.
AND IF YOU DON'T THINK I BELIEVE IN IT, I BOUGHT IT, AND I LOVED, LOVED THAT I HAD IT,
[02:20:06]
YOU KNOW, AND AND I'VE SEEN IT GROWING AND, AND I JUST APPRECIATE THE LEADERSHIP AND THE WHOLE THING IS ABOUT BALANCE AND CONTROL AND YOU KNOW, AND I, I JUST THINK OVERALL IF WE JUST WALK AROUND GARLAND, WE KNOW IT WORKS. AND SO WE'RE JUST TAKING THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION, LOOKING AT THAT EMPTY BUILDING, JUST LIKE WE TOOK THE SIGN ORDINANCE.DOES IT MAKE SENSE FOR THIS PARTICULAR OCCASION RIGHT IN FRONT OF US TONIGHT? THANK YOU SIR. YES, MA'AM. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS, GOOD EVENING SIR. YES, SIR. I ASK YOU ONE QUESTION.
YES. NO REPLY. DO YOU SUPPORT THE BUSINESS THAT HAS AN APPLICATION BEFORE US TONIGHT? YES OR NO? YES. THANK YOU. YES. RIGHT. THANK YOU SIR. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR NEXT SPEAKER, BERNARD SHAW? YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS? FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. MY NAME IS BERNARD SHAW, 3102 MAPLE AVENUE, DALLAS, TEXAS. I AM NOT RELATED TO THIS CASE WHATSOEVER. OUR CASE IS THE NEXT CASE 80. BUT I BUT I HEARD I HEARD THE COMMENTS AND THESE CASES ARE RELATED. SO I JUST WANT TO GIVE RESPECT. AND HERE'S THE PERSPECTIVE. IF I CAN HELP. I WORK AS AN ASSET MANAGER WITH WEITZMAN AND WE BUILD SHOPPING CENTERS. WE'VE GOT FOUR IN THE CITY OF GARLAND. WE AS AN ASSET MANAGER, I'M RESPONSIBLE. I'M FIDUCIARY TO MAKE SURE THAT I GET THE SHOPPING CENTERS LEASED UP AND WITH THE RIGHT TENANTS, WITH THE RIGHT TENANT MIX. BEFORE I GOT THERE, I WAS A LITTLE BOY WHO GREW UP IN SOUTH DALLAS FAIR PARK. MY MOM LIVED IN A PROJECTS FOR 40 YEARS. WE DIDN'T HAVE A WASHER AND DRYER.
WE COULDN'T AFFORD IT, AND SHE COULDN'T AFFORD IT UNTIL PROBABLY 15 YEARS INTO THE OVER 40 YEARS THAT SHE LIVED IN THE PROJECTS. AND SO I'M HERE JUST TRYING TO ADVOCATE WHEN WE TALK ABOUT LAUNDROMATS. I'M HERE TO ADVOCATE FOR THE MOTHERS AND FATHERS, THE PARENTS WHO CAN'T AFFORD IT. AND I KNOW IN 2026 WE MIGHT THINK THAT THAT'S RIDICULOUS. WHY CAN'T YOU AFFORD A WASHER AND DRYER? YOU CAN'T AFFORD IT JUST BECAUSE THINGS ARE CHANGING. THE PEOPLE WHO CAN'T AFFORD THE LOWER CLASS OR THINGS ARE WORSE. THEY'RE LIVING PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK. THEY'RE WORKING THREE AND FOUR JOBS JUST TO TRY TO PUT FOOD ON THE TABLE. THEY DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO BUY WASHERS AND DRYERS. AND SO A LAUNDROMAT BEING A CONVENIENCE FOR THEM IS IS IT'S I DON'T SEE WHY IT'S EVEN AN OBNOXIOUS USE. I MEAN, IT'S IT'S ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT'S A NECESSITY. AND TO BE QUITE HONEST WITH YOU, IF I JUST FAST FORWARD TO WHAT I DO RIGHT NOW IN RETAIL, I MEAN, THE LIST OF RETAILERS IS SHRINKING DAILY. THERE'S A FINITE LIST, AND THE PROCESS OF FILLING UP SPACE IS REALLY BY SELF-SELECTION. IT'S AN ORGANIC PROCESS. WHAT? I DON'T KNOW THIS PROPERTY, BUT I CAN TELL YOU RIGHT NOW IF THEY COULD GET A PAPPADEAUX OVER THERE, IF THEY COULD GET SOMETHING THAT'S UPSCALE, THEY WOULD HAVE GOTTEN IT. THE MARKET DICTATES WHAT YOU CAN GET IN A LOT OF THESE ENVIRONMENTS. IT'S NOT YOU. I HAVE A WISH LIST OF THINGS THAT I WANTED. MY SHOPPING CENTERS AND I MANAGE OVER DONE OVER 3,000,000FT■S OF DEALS. I DON'T GET EVERY DEAL THAT I WANT. I GET THE DEALS THAT THE MARKET WOULD GIVE ME. TO USE A FOOTBALL ANALOGY, I HAVE TO SOMETIMES JUST TAKE WHAT THE DEFENSE GIVES ME. PERHAPS THE DEFENSE HAS ONLY GIVEN THEM A LARGER MAC FOR THIS SPACE. I HEARD METRICS THAT THIS THING HAS BEEN IT'S 70% VACANT, AND IT'S BEEN LIKE THAT FOR 15 YEARS. GOD BLESS YOU. I MEAN, SERIOUSLY. GOD BLESS YOU. IN MY WORLD, THAT'S THEY'RE LOSING MONEY. THEY'RE LOSING MONEY. LAUNDROMATS ARE NOT OFFENSIVE. THEY HELP PEOPLE. AND I TELL YOU WHAT, WHEN THE MONEY RUNS OUT, IF IF THE MARKET DOESN'T WANT THE LAUNDROMAT, THEN THEY'LL GO OUT OF BUSINESS AND THEY'LL PUT SOMETHING ELSE IN IT. RIGHT. SO I'M I'M HERE TO ADVOCATE FOR THEM, BUT IT IMPACTS THE NEXT CASE TO. SO THAT'S THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY.
THANK YOU. SIR, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU, COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. YES. YES, SIR. THANKS FOR COMING DOWN FROM DALLAS. ABSOLUTELY. WE HAVE FOUR SHOPPING CENTERS HERE. ENJOY.
ENJOY YOUR BACKGROUND. BUT THAT'S NOT THE CASE BEFORE US TONIGHT, SIR. AND I HAVE ONE
[02:25:02]
QUESTION FOR YOU. DO YOU SUPPORT OR DON'T YOU SUPPORT THE REQUEST THAT'S BEFORE US TONIGHT? YES, I SUPPORT IT. THAT'S ALL I NEED TO HEAR. NO MORE. YES, SIR. THANK YOU. YES, SIR. THANK YOU, THANK YOU SIR, THANK YOU, I APPRECIATE IT. ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SIR, IF YOU'D SPEAK NOW OR AFTERWARDS, I ASK YOU TO FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD.THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY? YES. YOU STILL HAVE TO FILL OUT A CARD. YES, SIR. AFTER. AFTER YOU SPEAK, PLEASE SPEAK FIRST. YEP. DAVID NAJAFI, 5482 TRAVIS DRIVE IN FRISCO. THEY BUILT THIS SHOPPING CENTER ABOUT FIVE YEARS AGO. THEY CHANGED THE ZONING ON US MANY, MANY TIMES.
DO YOU THINK WE ARE NOT LOOKING FOR RESTAURANT IN THAT LOCATION WE HIRED IN THE LAST FOUR YEARS, THREE DIFFERENT TOP REAL ESTATE COMPANY TO GET US TO SOME KIND OF RESTAURANT OVER THERE. WE COULDN'T GET IT. NOW WE ARE LUCKY TO HAVE HER TO COME AND DO A COIN LAUNDRY. THIS COIN LAUNDRY IS GOING TO COST HER PROBABLY OVER 1 MILLION, 1.2 MILLION, AND IT'S GOING TO BE A STATE OF ART LAUNDRY. IT'S NOT GOING TO BE ONE OF THOSE CHEAPIE COIN LAUNDRY YOU SEE ON THE OLD NEIGHBORHOOD. SO WE ARE PAYING MORE THAN 6 MILLION. I MEAN, 660. WHAT IS THAT? WHAT, ALMOST $120,000 A YEAR TAXES ON THIS PROPERTY? EVERY TIME WE COME TO CITY, FOR SOME UNKNOWN REASON, THEY REJECT US. LOOKS LIKE THEY DON'T WANT THAT PROPERTY TO BE OCCUPIED. SO NOW SHE'S HERE. YOU GIVE HER A HARD TIME ASKING SO MANY QUESTIONS. DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY APARTMENTS IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD? ANYBODY ON STAFF KNOWS EXACTLY HOW MANY APARTMENTS ARE OUT THERE? DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY OF THEM? THEY DO NOT HAVE WASHER AND DRYER IN THEIR APARTMENTS? NO. SHE HAS DONE A STUDY AND SHE'S GOING TO DO A COIN LAUNDRYANUFACTURE. THEY COME OUT THERE, THEY DO INVESTIGATION. THEY DO RESEARCH TO FIND OUT IF THAT BUSINESS IS GOING TO SURVIVE OR NOT. THEY HAVE DONE ALL THAT SO THEY KNOW WHAT IS THE CLOSEST COIN LAUNDRY TO THIS ONE. THEY KNOW IT'S PROBABLY ABOUT 4 OR 5 MILES. SO THIS IS GOING TO SURVIVE THIS COIN LAUNDRY IS ONLY GOING TO SELL THE MERCHANDISE RELATED TO COIN LAUNDRY, NOTHING MORE, NOTHING LESS. ONE OF YOUR CITY COUNCIL WAS ASKING IF THEY WANT TO SELL SOME MERCHANDISE. WE DO HAVE A STORE IN THE SAME SHOPPING CENTER AND THEY HAVE COMPETING CLAUSE. SO IF THEY ARE SELLING SOME MERCHANDISE, THIS COIN LAUNDRY CANNOT SELL THE SAME THING. SO COIN LAUNDRY IS GOING TO REMAIN A COIN LAUNDRY. THERE HAS ANY QUESTION YOU CAN ASK ALL MAYOR PRO TEM. LOOK SIR, WHEN WAS THE BUILDING BUILT? I'VE HEARD 11, 15, FIVE. IT HAS A LONG HISTORY. WE STARTED IN 2014. IN 2017, THEY CHANGED THE ZONING ON US. AND THEY SAID BECAUSE WE STARTED GETTING THE PERMIT FOR RETAIL 2017, THEY SAID, OH, YOU CANNOT DO THAT. THEN SOMEBODY IN THE CITY SAID, NO, YOU CAN'T GO AHEAD AND DO SHOPPING CENTER. SO WE START BUILDING THE SHOPPING CENTER.
IT TOOK US ALMOST FOUR YEARS TO BUILD THE SHOPPING CENTER. THEN WE STARTED LISTENING TO SOME OF THE TENANTS. THE CITY CAME BACK TO US AND SAID, OH, THERE'S A MISTAKE HERE. THIS IS A COMMUNITY OFFICE YOU CANNOT DO. WE HAD SO MANY APPLICATIONS TO THE CITY. THEY REJECTED IT.
THEY SAID, YOUR ZONING IS COMMUNITY. COMMUNITY SERVICE. THEN THEY PUT US TO GO TO ANOTHER REZONING PROCESS THAT TOOK US ANOTHER 5 OR 6 MONTHS. SO THIS BUILDING BEEN SITTING THERE. WE ARE PAYING TAXES FOR NO GOOD REASON. THIS IS NOT A FRIENDLY CITY. WE DO PROJECT IN EVERY OTHER CITY, THE CITY COUNCIL, THE CITY. THEY WOULD HELP US HERE EVERY TIME WE CAME TO THE CITY, THE ONLY PERSON HELP US SO FAR IS MR. MOORE. EVERYBODY ELSE HAS REJECTED US FOR SOME UNKNOWN REASON. THAT'S ALL I'M AFRAID TO ASK. WHAT YEAR WAS THE BUILDING COMPLETED?
[02:30:11]
2022, I GUESS 2021. SO FIVE YEARS AGO. THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. SIR.HERE. THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN TONIGHT AND GIVING US THAT HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF THIS, THIS PROPERTY. I JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION TO ASK YOU. THE QUESTION, THE ISSUE THAT'S BEFORE US TONIGHT TO APPROVE OR NOT APPROVE. DO YOU SUPPORT, OF COURSE, THAT THAT THE MATTER BEFORE US TONIGHT? OF COURSE WE HAVE SUPPORT. YES. YOU DO. YES. ALL RIGHT. THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO ASK. THANK YOU. I SEE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. SIR, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, SIR, THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. THE HISTORY THAT YOU HAVE JUST HEARD IS VERY ACCURATE, AND I'VE HAD THE PRIVILEGE OF WORKING WITH THEM THROUGH THE ENTIRE PROCESS. AND WE'VE WATCHED THIS PROPERTY TIME AND AGAIN COME BEFORE US. AND YES, THERE HAVE BEEN A LOT OF DIFFERENT CHANGES AND A LOT OF HURDLES. HE'S HAD TO OVERCOME. FOR SOME REASON, THOUGH, HE KEEPS COMING BACK.
HE KEEPS STANDING AND COMING BACK. AND THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS, YOU SEE, BECAUSE I DO I DO THIS QUESTIONING OFTENTIMES BECAUSE I WANT OUR PUBLIC ALSO TO HEAR AND TO UNDERSTAND WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON. WE HAVE STRATEGIC PLANS AND THESE STRATEGIC PLANS ENVISION GARLAND, THE I30 CORRIDOR CATALYST STUDY. ALL OF THESE STUDIES CAUSE US TO WANT TO BE PURPOSEFUL ABOUT HOW WE'RE GOING TO IMPLEMENT BUILDING ZONING IN PARTICULAR AREAS SUCH THAT WE CAN GROW THE CITY. AND IN GROWING THE CITY, OF COURSE, THAT'S GOING TO, OF COURSE, IMPROVE OUR TAX BASE. IT'S GOING TO BRING BUSINESS TO THE COMMUNITY. THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION IS ONE WHERE YOU'RE RIGHT THERE ON I-30. AND BECAUSE THAT BUILDING IS SO BEAUTIFUL, YOU ARE KIND OF WHAT WE CALL A ENTRY POINT. YOU'RE A GATEWAY, AND WE WANT IT TO BE SUCH THAT WHEN YOU DRIVE IN OR WHEN YOU'RE DRIVING BY, IT'S A SITUATION OF WHERE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO WANT TO BE ATTRACTED TO IT. THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS I DID, BECAUSE I KNOW THERE ARE PEOPLE ON THIS COUNCIL WHEN THEY HEAR A WASHATERIA. AND SO THAT'S THE REASON I TRIED TO PREFACE IT IN THE MANNER OF WHICH I DID. BUT THAT'S ALSO THE REASON THAT I SAID TO YOU AND I SAY TO YOU AGAIN, I AM GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TONIGHT TO APPROVE YOU BECAUSE I KNOW WHAT YOU'VE BEEN THROUGH. I KNOW YOU'RE SITTING THERE WITH A VACANT BUILDING, AND I ALSO KNOW THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH A WASHATERIA NOTHING WHATSOEVER. THAT BUILDING IS SUCH THAT MOST OF YOUR PEOPLE DON'T EVEN COME IN THROUGH THAT INTEREST. THEY COME IN THROUGH THE BACK ENTRANCE. AND SO IT WILL BE A NICE FACILITY. IT WILL BE A NICE BUSINESS. BUT THE OTHER THING ABOUT ALL OF THIS IS WE CAN CONTINUE TO TRY AND PUT THINGS IN THERE THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE. BUT I THINK THE BOTTOM LINE IS WHAT IS THE BEST USE OF THE LAND. AND I DO BELIEVE A WASHATERIA WOULD GO WELL THERE. MR. MAYOR, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE. THE PROJECT AS IT'S COME BEFORE US WITH A TEN YEAR SUB MOTION TO APPROVE WITH A TEN YEAR SUPPLY AND SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER BASS. IS THAT CORRECT? SIR? WE HAVE A FEW MEMBERS IN THE QUEUE TO DISCUSS. DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM OUGHT FOR DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION. MY DISCUSSION WAS JUST TO ASK IF THAT MOTION WOULD INCLUDE THE THE EXTRA PROVISIONS THAT I DISCUSSED EARLIER. THE APPLICANT DIDN'T HAVE ANY RESERVATION FOR IT. ARE YOU OKAY WITH THAT? I DON'T KNOW WHETHER HE WANTS TO ASSURE, BUT YES, 705 AMENDMENT ACCEPTED.
ALL RIGHT. AND CAN YOU RESTATE THE AMENDMENT THEN PLEASE RESTATE THE AMENDMENT. THE AMENDMENT WOULD BE THAT WE THAT THE THIS PARTICULAR BUSINESS WOULD BE RESTRICTED TO, TO THE BUSINESS OF A COIN OPERATED LAUNDRY, BUT ALSO THE THINGS THAT THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO SELL
[02:35:07]
WOULD BE THINGS THAT ARE RELATED TO THAT PARTICULAR BUSINESS. IT WOULD BE EXCLUDING THINGS THAT I WAS MENTIONING BEFORE, BUT IT'S THE ONLY THINGS THEY CAN SELL IS THINGS THAT ARE RELATED TO THE COIN OPERATED LAUNDRY. COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, DO YOU ACCEPT THE AMENDMENT? I'LL ACCEPT THE AMENDMENT IF THE OWNER IS ACCEPTING IT, BUT I REALLY DON'T SEE THE NEED FOR IT. BUT YES, I'LL ACCEPT. ACCEPT. AND COUNCILMEMBER BASS, YOU'RE THE SECOND TO ACCEPT THE AMENDMENT. I DO NOT KNOW THAT IT'S PRESENTED. IT'S TOO SPECIFIC.HE'S IT DOESN'T TAKE CERTAIN THINGS INTO CONSIDERATION THAT ARE A COMMON PART OF THE BUSINESS, NOT RELATED TO COIN OPERATED LAUNDRY, SUCH AS THEY SAID THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE FLUFF AND FOLD SERVICE. SO NO, I DON'T SECOND IT AS PRESENTED BY COUNCILMEMBER. THAT IS NOT SECONDED. WE WE'RE PAST DISCUSSION OR I'M SORRY SIR I'M SORRY WE'RE PAST DISCUSSION.
YEAH. WE'VE ALREADY PASSED THAT PART OF IT. I'M SORRY I ASKED FOR SPEAKERS SEVERAL TIMES.
THANK YOU SIR, THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. SIR, YOUR REQUEST TO SPEAK ON T THE MOTION. NO, I WAS I MEAN, I SUPPORT THAT THE MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMEMBER, COUNCILMAN, COUNCILMAN, I DON'T SUPPORT. ONE SECOND, SIR. SPEAK. DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM, I'D LIKE TO PUT MY MOTION TO A VOTE. I HAVE A MOTION. IS THAT A MOTION FOR AN AMENDMENT? YES, I HAVE A MOTION FOR AMENDMENT. DO WE HAVE A SECOND ON THAT MOTION FOR AMENDMENT? A SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM. ALL RIGHT. SO WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND. WE'LL TAKE THAT ITEM FIRST. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION? ALL RIGHT. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE PREPARE A VOTE FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE ORIGINAL MOTION? AMENDMENT FAILS 5 TO 4. SO WE'LL PICK UP THE ORIGINAL MOTION. THERE'S A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CIP FOR A TEN YEAR TIME PERIOD. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT? MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE PREPARE THE VOTE ON THAT ITEM? OKAY. IT TAKES A MOMENT WHEN WE'RE GETTING A COUPLE LEVELS DEEP THERE. AND THAT ITEM PASSES 7 TO 2 WITH MAYOR PRO TEM LUK AND DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM IN OPPOSITION. THANK YOU
[e. Consider a request by WashWell US-001 LLC, requesting approval of 1) a Specific Use Provision (SUP) to allow for a Laundry, Self-Serve (Laundromat) use and 2) a Concept Plan for the Laundry, Self-Serve (Laundromat) use. The site is located at 1861 North Garland Avenue, Suite 103 on a property zoned Community Retail (CR) District in District 8.]
VERY MUCH. MOVE ON. NOW TO OUR NEXT ITEM IS ITEM EIGHT E. CONSIDER A REQUEST BY WASH WELL US 001 LLC REQUESTING APPROVAL OF ONE SPECIFIC USE PROVISION TO ALLOW FOR LAUNDRY, SELF-SERVICE LAUNDROMAT USE, AND TWO A CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE LAUNDRY SELF-SERVICE LAUNDROMAT USE. THE SITE IS LOCATED AT 1861 NORTH GARLAND AVENUE, SUITE 103. PROPERTY ZONED COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT IN DISTRICT EIGHT. THANK YOU MAYOR. AS YOU MENTIONED, THIS IS AN REQUEST FOR ANOTHER LAUNDRY SELF-SERVICE LAUNDROMAT USE. THIS TIME. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT AND IT IS AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER SUITE. THIS IS LOCATED IN DISTRICT EIGHT, 1861 NORTH GARLAND AVENUE. IT IS ONE SWEET SUITE 103. THE ENTIRE SITE IS 8.83 ACRES. THE SUBJECT SUITE IS 4800 SQUARE FOOT. AS MENTIONED, THE ZONING IS COMMUNITY RETAIL. HERE YOU CAN SEE THE ZONING MAP, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE SURROUNDING USES. THERE ARE LOTS OF DIFFERENT COMMERCIAL USES. THERE'S DOMINOS, A DOLLAR GENERAL, DIFFERENT OTHER. THERE'S ACROSS THE STREET THERE'S AN AUTO USE, DIFFERENT TYPE OF COMMERCIAL. HOWEVER, FURTHER SOUTHEAST AND EVEN NORTHWEST ON ALL DIFFERENT SIDES. AS YOU GO A LITTLE FURTHER, THOSE ARE ALL SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CALLS THIS AREA. AS FOR CALL CALLS, THIS AREA OUT FOR NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS. NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS PROVIDE A MIX OF RETAIL SERVICES AND COMMUNITY GATHERING PLACES. THIS CENTER SHOULD BE APPROPRIATELY SCALED TO ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS.ONCE AGAIN, IT IS AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS ONE AND
[02:40:03]
THE ONE THAT WE JUST DISCUSSED. ONE OF THE POINTS THAT WAS DISCUSSED DISCUSSED DURING THE LAST ONE WAS WHAT ARE THE SURROUNDING USES? AND THERE WERE A LOT OF MULTIFAMILY USES AROUND THAT, THAT PROPERTY AS OPPOSED TO ON THIS ONE. IT IS SURROUNDED BY A LOT OF DIFFERENT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, AND SINGLE FAMILY HOMES MAY NOT HAVE AS MUCH NEED FOR A LAUNDROMAT AS MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS MAY HAVE. HERE ARE SOME SITE PHOTOS FROM DIFFERENT ANGLES. SOME OTHER SITE PHOTOS SHOWING DIFFERENT BUSINESSES ON THE SITE. ON THIS WE SHOW THE SHOPPING CENTER AND THE PARKING. THEY ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH PARKING, SO HAVING THIS NEW USE WILL NOT CREATE A PARKING ISSUE. THIS IS WHERE THERE WHERE YOU SEE THE RED RECTANGLE. THAT'S WHERE THE SWEET IS, WHERE THEY'RE PROPOSING THE LAUNDROMAT. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A 20 YEAR SUPPY. AGAIN, THEY'RE TRYING TO ALIGN IT WITH THEIR LEASE. I'M NOT GOING TO REPEAT MYSELF ABOUT THE S U P POLICY GUIDELINES, BUT FOR THESE KIND OF SCENARIOS, WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT RECOMMENDING 5 TO 10 YEARS, AS THIS DOES NOT HAVE ANY PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS. AGAIN, WE ANALYZE SOME OF THE SURROUNDING USES. THIS PROPOSED USE IS ALREADY VERY COMMON IN THE AREA. THERE ARE THREE OTHER LAUNDROMATS WITHIN ONE MILE FROM THE SUBJECT SITE, SO THAT'S ALREADY PROVIDING THE SERVICE THAT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR THE SURROUNDING AREAS. AND AGAIN, WE BELIEVE THERE'S POTENTIAL FOR MORE ELEVATED USES AT THIS LOCATION. IF COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO APPROVE, WE DO RECOMMEND 5 TO 8 YEAR TIME PERIOD. PLANNING COMMISSION DID RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR TEN YEARS. WE SENT OUT 145 LETTERS AND WE RECEIVED TWO IN FAVOR. AND WITH THAT, I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.ALL RIGHT COUNCIL, ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS ITEM? COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THE OTHER TWO, THE OTHER LAUNDROMATS THAT ARE IN THAT AREA, DID YOU GET ANY RESPONSE FROM THEM? THEY MAY NOT HAVE GOTTEN THERE WITHIN A MILE, BUT THEY MAY NOT BE WITHIN 400FT WHERE WE SEND THE LETTERS. SO YOU DID YOU DID NOT GET YOU DID NOT GET A RESPONSE FROM THEM, NOT FROM THE OTHER LAUNDROMATS? NO, SIR. SEND THEM NOTICE. THAT'S WHAT I CAN'T. I'M SURE WE HAVE NOT SENT THEM LETTERS ALL THE, ALL THE WAY UP UNTIL ONE MILE RADIUS, BECAUSE WE ARE ONLY SENDING LETTERS WITHIN 400FT, WHICH IS WAY LESS THAN ONE MILE.
AND THEY THEY BOTH BOTH BOTH OF THEM, ALL OF THEM ARE SELF SERVICE. THEY'RE LAUNDROMATS, PER OUR DEFINITIONS. YES. SO WHEN WE SAY LAUNDROMATS, THOSE ARE BY DEFINITION SELF SERVICE OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU. MAYOR. DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM MAYOR. THERE WAS A THERE WAS A LAUNDROMAT THAT WAS IN THIS COMPLEX IN THE PAST. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT, SIR. WHERE IN THE COMPLEX WAS IT? YOU KNOW, I DO NOT KNOW THE EXACT SUITE WHERE IT WAS. BUT THIS THE APPLICANT ON THAT. OKAY, BUT THAT WAS BEFORE WE HAVE THE WE HAD THE SUV REQUIREMENT IN THE COMMUNITY RETAIL ZONING DISTRICT. SO AT THAT TIME THAT WAS PERMITTED BY.
RIGHT. BUT THEN THEY CLOSED. SO NOW THEY'RE SUBJECT TO OUR CURRENT CDC REQUIREMENT, WHICH REQUIRES AN SUV. RIGHT. OKAY. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. SIR. MAYOR PRO TEM LUCK, WILL YOU GO BACK TO THE. THE MAP WHERE IT SHOWS THE LAUNDROMATS WITHIN THE SUBJECT AREA? I DO WANT TO PROVIDE A DISCLAIMER. THIS DID COME FROM THE APPLICANT, SO YOU MAY PROBABLY SEE IT IN THE ON THE APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION AS WELL. I JUST HAD IT HANDY IN CASE IT COMES UP. SO 123456.
AND THEN ONE LOOKS LIKE IT'S LESS THAN HALF A MILE AWAY. IS THAT CORRECT? LAUNDRY. WELL, THERE'S ONE WITHIN 0.5 MILES, ONE WITHIN 0.7 MILES AND ONE WITHIN ONE MILE FROM. SEEMS PRETTY SATURATED WITH LAUNDROMATS IN THAT AREA. AND WHAT WHAT IS THE CLOSEST MULTIFAMILY? DO YOU KNOW? I DO NOT KNOW WHERE THE CLOSEST MULTIFAMILY IS BECAUSE WHEREVER I, I THE EXTENT THAT I LOOKED AT IT WAS SINGLE FAMILY. SO WITHIN THAT MILE RADIUS, WERE THERE ALREADY SIX LAUNDROMATS? THERE'S NO APARTMENT COMPLEXES. I DO NOT BELIEVE SO. IT. SO BUCKINGHAM AND SHILOH HAS ONE THE BAM WASH AND THEN. BUCKINGHAM AND GLENBROOK.
WHAT'S THE CLOSEST ONE? OH, I GUESS THAT WOULD BE. THAT WOULD BE THE CLOSEST ONE. BUT LAUNDRY
[02:45:04]
WELLS LESS THAN HALF A MILE AWAY. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF ON THIS ITEM? MADAM SECRETARY, PLEASE CALL OUR APPPPLICANT. BARRY LOVALLO. ALL RIGHT. TO GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE TEN MINUTES FOR YOUR PRESENTATION.THANK YOU. LONG TIME RESIDENTS CURRENTLY LIVING IN. 16 SOUTH LAKE DRIVE, SANTA ROSA BEACH, FLORIDA. THIS IS VERY INTERESTING TO BE UP HERE, ESPECIALLY AFTER THE THE LAST CONVERSATION THAT WAS JUST GOING ON. WE HAVE SEVERAL THINGS IN COMMON AND SEVERAL THINGS THAT ARE DIFFERENT. I'M GOING TO TRY TO TAKE YOU QUICKLY THROUGH WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE, AND TRY TO STAY COGNIZANT OF THE TIME. I MAY SKIP THROUGH A FEW THINGS. IF I DO, THEN I APOLOGIZE. WE MAY BE ABLE TO COME BACK TO THEM. WE'RE SEEKING AN SUP FOR SELF SERVE LAUNDROMAT. WE'RE SEEKING 20 YEARS TO ALIGN WITH OUR LEASE, AND WE'LL BE COMING BACK TO THAT IN A MOMENT TO EXPLAIN WHY THAT'S IMPORTANT TO US. THE FACILITY ITSELF IS A TOP QUALITY OFFERING. LIKE YOU HEARD BEFORE, LAUNDROMATS ARE NOT THE PLACES YOU'RE PROBABLY THINKING OF. THIS IS A SPEED QUEEN FRANCHISE, SO IT'S ADHERING TO THE RULES OF THE FRANCHISE, WHICH ARE VERY STRICT, CLEAN, BRIGHT, NEW. WE'RE DESIGNED WITH FAMILIES.
ROUGHLY 95 MACHINES WILL BE PUT IN PLACE. WE ARE FAMILY FORWARD OVERALL, PLENTY OF SEATING AND TABLES. IT'S BRIGHTLY LIT. IT'S GOT CLEAR LINES OF SIGHT SO PARENTS CAN SEE THEIR CHILDREN AND THEY CAN MAINTAIN THE SAFETY. IT IS ALWAYS STAFFED. THERE WILL ALWAYS BE AT LEAST ONE AND SOMETIMES THREE PEOPLE ON STAFF AT ALL TIMES. THERE'S VIDEO SURVEILLANCE INSIDE AND OUT, CUSTOMER INTERNET AND KIDS AREAS FOR PLAYING AND SO ON. I WANT TO JUST SHOW YOU A COUPLE OF PICTURES SO YOU CAN SEE WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. YOU CAN SEE HERE THE THE IPADS AND THE LEARNING CENTER. OKAY. SO I WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE SAFETY AND SECURITY. ONE OF THE REASONS I GOT INTO THIS IS I HAVE TWO DAUGHTERS OFF IN SCHOOL. IN COLLEGE, I WAS TALKING TO THEM ONE DAY AND ASKING WHAT THEY WERE DOING WITH THEIR LAUNDRY, AND THEY BOTH TOLD ME THEY WOULD NEVER LEAVE BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T FEEL SAFE IN ANY OF THE LAUNDROMATS THAT WERE NEAR THEM. THEY WERE THE TRADITIONAL LAUNDROMATS, NOT STAFFED. THAT'S HOW I STARTED LOOKING AND HOW I FOUND THE SPEED QUEEN MODEL. SO FOR US, SAFETY AND SECURITY ARE VERY IMPORTANT. WE WILL ALWAYS BE STAFFED WHEN OPEN. AS I SAID, FULL SURVEILLANCE, CHROMOSOME ALARM, PANIC BUTTONS IN A SECURED ROOM FOR THE STAFF AND THERE ARE NO DIRECT TRANSFER CASH TRANSACTIONS. EVERYTHING IS DONE BY CARD OR APP. THERE IS A BILL BREAKER THAT WILL ACTUALLY CONVERT CASH TO CARD, BUT IT'S OFF IN THE CORNER. WE ARE A LOW IMPACT BUSINESS.
THERE'S NO UNUSUAL PROCESSES OR CHEMICALS INVOLVED. THERE'S NO NEED FOR ADDITIONAL WATER TREATMENT OR AIR TREATMENT OR ANYTHING RELATED TO IT. LIMITED TRASH GENERATION REALLY NOTHING OTHER THAN WHAT YOU WOULD HAVE IN YOUR OWN HOME DOING LAUNDRY. WE'RE GOING TO BE FULLY STAFFED, AS I SAID, BETWEEN 1 AND 3 EMPLOYEES. WE EXPECT TO INITIALLY HIRE ABOUT 20 INDIVIDUALS. MOST OF THOSE WILL BE PART TIME. A LOT OF THOSE WILL BE PARENTS WHO ARE SEEKING FLEXIBILITY IN THEIR SCHEDULES. WE PICKED NORTH STAR PLUS FOR A COUPLE REASONS. IT'S A SOLID NEIGHBORHOOD WITH RENTALS IN THE AREA. I KNOW WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT DENSITY, SINGLE FAMILY VERSUS MULTIFAMILY. WE'RE MUCH MORE INTERESTED IN RENTAL VERSUS OWNERSHIP. THE DEMOGRAPHIC FOR LAUNDROMATS TENDS TO FOCUS NOT ON THE APARTMENT COMPLEX AS MUCH AS IT DOES ON THE NUMBER OF RENTALS IN THE AREA, BECAUSE RENTALS ARE MUCH LESS LIKELY TO HAVE THEIR OWN LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT. WE SEE A GOOD MIX OF RETAIL IN THE AREA AND THE EXTENDED AREA THAT'S GOING TO BE GOOD FOR US, AND THERE WAS PREVIOUSLY A LAUNDROMAT IN THE SPOT THAT SURVIVED FOR 20 YEARS AND DID QUITE WELL. THEY WERE EVENTUALLY CLOSED BECAUSE THE LANDLORD YOU ACTUALLY MET, BERNARD EARLIER WAS LOOKING FOR A HIGHER LEVEL OFFERING. THERE IS LOCAL COMPETITION. I'LL BRING THAT MAP UP AGAIN IN A MOMENT, BUT I VISITED EVERY ONE OF THOSE AND NONE OF THEM ARE STAFFED FULL TIME. THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT MODEL, PROBABLY CLOSER TO THE MODEL. YOU'RE THINKING OF WHERE PEOPLE COME IN ALONE. THERE MIGHT BE SOMEONE WHO COMES IN AND CLEANS UP OCCASIONALLY, BUT IF SOMEONE COMES IN THERE, THEY ARE THE ONLY PERSON, SO THEY'RE NOT ASSISTED. THEY TYPICALLY DON'T OFFER CONTROLS AS WELL.
CHALLENGES. THE VACANCY RATE IN THIS MALL IS, I THINK, A LITTLE HIGHER THAN PEOPLE WOULD LIKE.
IN PARTICULAR, THE SPOT WE'RE LOOKING AT HAS BEEN VACANT SINCE 2013. IT IS NOT A GREAT SPACE, FRANKLY, IF YOU'RE TRYING TO DO RETAIL, IT IS INTERIOR. YOU CAN'T SEE IT FROM THE STREET. IT FACES THE HASN'T REALLY HAD ANYTHING IN THERE IN A VERY LONG TIME, THE EQUIPMENT IS FAR OUTDATED. SO WE'RE E GOING TOE SPENDING A LOT OF MONEY TO BRING THAT UP
[02:50:02]
TO SPEC. BUT I THINK THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY HERE TO CREATE BASICALLY THE VIRTUOUS CIRCLE, WHICH IS, AS WE GET IN, UPGRADE THE FACILITIES, WE WILL BE DRAWING MORE INTO THE INTO THE PLAZA. AND I THINK THAT WILL BENEFIT THE OTHER BUSINESSES IN THE AREA. THIS IS THE MAP YOU WERE LOOKING AT BEFORE, SO I WON'T GO INTO IT ANY MORE. BUT AS I SAID, I'VE PHYSICALLY BEEN TO EVERY ONE OF THOSE AND NONE OF THEM ARE FULLY STAFFED AT ALL TIMES. SO THE OFFERING IS FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT. HERE IS A MODEL OF WHO'S COMING INTO THE PLAZA. AT THE MOMENT, YOU CAN SEE ROUGHLY 75% OF THE PEOPLE ARE COMING FROM WITHIN A THREE MILE RADIUS. ABOUT HALF OF THAT IS ACTUALLY COMING FROM 1 TO 2 MILE OR 1 TO 3 MILES AWAY ALREADY. SO PEOPLE ARE NOT SIMPLY WALKING IN FROM THE SURROUNDING AREA, THEY'RE STOPPING BY ON PURPOSE. THIS IS A MAP TO ANSWER ONE OF YOUR QUESTIONS BEFORE EACH OF THE GREEN DOTS IS A MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE. THIS IS A THREE MILE RADIUS AND THE AREAS IN THE LOWER RIGHT YOU CAN SEE THE COLOR CODING CORRESPOND TO THE AMOUNT OF RENTAL IN THE AREA. AGAIN, WE'RE MORE INTERESTED IN RENTAL THAN WE ARE. WHETHER IT'S SINGLE OR MULTI-FAMILY. WE'D LOVE IT ALL TO BE SOLID BLUE. BUT YOU CAN SEE THIS IS A THREE MILE RADIUS, THE DRAW AREA. WE JUST LOOKED AT ABOUT AN 8 TO 10 MINUTE DRIVE. IN MOST CASES WE HAVE PLENTY OF BLUE, A GOOD AMOUNT OF PINK.CERTAINLY THE AREA IMMEDIATELY AROUND THE FACILITY IS IS NOT WHAT I WOULD HAVE WANTED NORMALLY, BUT THE EXTENDED AREA FROM WHICH WE DRAW IS IS GREAT AND SHOULD WORK OUT VERY WELL FOR US. THERE ARE A COUPLE OF OBJECTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED IN THE PAST, SO I JUST WANTED TO HIT THEM. I DID TALK TO TO SOME OF YOU ALREADY. WE'RE HAPPY TO ACCEPT THE RESTRICTION ON THE ITEMS WE CAN SELL. I WOULD ASK THAT WE INCLUDE THE STANDARD CONVENIENCE ITEMS. WE EXPECT TO HAVE A CANDY MACHINE AND A DRINK MACHINE THAT SELLS NONALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. WE KNOW THAT THE WE'VE ALREADY DISCUSSED THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. WE KNOW THAT THE SCP APPLIES TO THE OCCUPANT AND NOT THE BUSINESS, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT. AND THAT A DIFFERENT TYPE OF RETAIL, PERHAPS YOU WOULD THINK IT WOULD SERVE THE COMMUNITY BETTER. BUT I THINK AT THIS POINT WE'RE REALLY NOT DISCUSSING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ALTERNATIVE RETAIL. WE'RE DISCUSSING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MAINTAINING OR CONTINUING TO BE EMPTY FOR ANOTHER 13 YEARS. OUR INVESTMENT, WE'RE GOING TO COMPLETELY REFINISH EVERYTHING NEW SIGNAGE, MULTIPLE LARGE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY AC SYSTEMS, NEW GAS, ELECTRIC WATER WITH INCREASED CAPACITY, ROUGHLY 1.4 MILLION IN INITIAL INVESTMENT. AND WE HAVE SIGNED A LEASE FOR 20 YEARS BECAUSE WE THINK IT'S GOING TO TAKE A LOT OF THAT TIME TO ACTUALLY RECOUP THE VALUE. OUR EQUIPMENT LIFESPAN IS BETWEEN 20 AND 40 YEARS. THOSE AIR CONDITIONERS THAT ARE GOING IN, THEY ARE VERY EXPENSIVE AND THEY ARE VERY LARGE. WE'RE GOING TO NEED, I THINK, 3 OR 4 OF THEM. SO IF WE WERE TO ONLY HAVE TEN YEARS, THAT WOULD BE QUITE A PROBLEM. HARD FOR US TO RECOUP THAT INVESTMENT BECAUSE AS I SAID, IT'S AN OLD BUILDING. THE OTHER THING TO CONSIDER IS OUR FINANCING REQUIRES TEN YEARS OF OPERATION. AND THERE'S A QUESTION ABOUT THE SUP WHEN IT ACTUALLY TAKES EFFECT. I HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO FIND AN ANSWER. I DON'T KNOW IF ANYONE KNOWS, BUT IF IT WERE TO TAKE EFFECT, FOR EXAMPLE, TODAY AND WE SEE 9 TO 15 MONTHS OF PERMITTING AND BUILD OUT, I WOULD ACTUALLY BE IN VIOLATION OF MY FINANCING, WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO FINANCE IT. SO WHAT I'M ACTUALLY LOOKING FOR IS, ALTHOUGH I WOULD LIKE THE 20 YEARS, IF WE HAVE LESS THAN 11.5 YEARS, I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO FINANCE IT AND I'LL BE EFFECTIVELY IN VIOLATION OF THE LEASE THAT I'VE SIGNED. OKAY, SO THAT'S KIND OF IT. I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU AND REMIND YOU THAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR 20 YEARS, BUT AT LEAST TEN YEARS OF OPERATION, IF THE SUB CAN BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY, OR 11.5 YEARS IF IT CAN'T, THAT'S ALL I HAVE. I WENT FASTER THAN I THOUGHT. WE HAVE SEVERAL QUESTIONS FOR YOU, SIR. SO WE'LL START WITH TIM LUCK. YOU DON'T ACCEPT CASH. WE HAVE THE MACHES THEMSELVES DO NOT TAKE CASH. THEY RUN ON APP OR CARDS.
THERE'S A BILL BREAKER IN THE BACK CORNER SO PEOPLE CAN PUT CASH INTO IT AND GET A CARD OR LOAD THEIR APP. IS THERE A FEE TO USE THE BILL BREAKER? NO, THERE'S NO FEE THAT GOES TO A SECURED ROOM. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER DENTON. IS DO YOU KNOW IS THE COIN OP LAUNDRY THAT IS IN THE ADJACENT BUILDING? IS THAT STILL OPEN AND FUNCTIONING? THERE WAS A PLACE THAT WAS OPEN FOR, I UNDERSTAND, AS MANY AS 30 YEARS, ALTHOUGH PERHAPS BERNARD COULD GIVE US THE DETAILS. IT'S BEEN CLOSED FOR MORE THAN A YEAR IN THAT PARTICULAR CASE, MUCH AS WE'VE DISCUSSED OR HAS BEEN DISCUSSED, THEY STOPPED PAYING ATTENTION. IN THE END, THEY WENT DOWNHILL. THEY WERE NOT PROVIDING QUALITY SERVICE. THEY HAD PROBLEMS WITH CRIME AND SO ON, WHICH IS ONE OF THE REASONS THE CURRENT MANAGEMENT WAS SO STRICT ON MY LEASE ABOUT WHAT I'M ALLOWED TO DO AND NOT DO, AND I'LL LEAVE IT AT THAT SO THAT YOU'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT
[02:55:02]
IN THE SAME SPOT THAT YOU'RE CURRENT. NO, IT WAS IN A DIFFERENT, DIFFERENT POINT ON BACK CORNER. OKAY. I WAS JUST MAKING SURE THAT I WASN'T CRAZY. YES. THAT WAS A FAR LESS DESIRABLE LAUNDROMAT. I HAVE A WASHER AND DRYER IN MY HOUSE. HOWEVER, I LIKE TO GO TO THE LAUNDROMAT AND WASH BLANKETS, SO I CURRENTLY DRIVE TO MARKETS DISTRICT TO GO TO A LAUNDROMAT BECAUSE I THE ONES THAT ARE IN MY DISTRICT ARE NOT. MOST OF THEM DON'T EVEN HAVE AIR CONDITIONING. IF WE'RE JUST BEING HONEST AND IT'S TOO HOT FOR ALL THAT BUSINESS. SO. IF YOU WOULD HAVE ASKED ME MY OPINION BEFORE I SAW YOUR PROPOSAL BEING A SPEED QUEEN AND THE QUALITY OF WHAT YOU'RE OFFERING, I PROBABLY WOULD HAVE BEEN AGAINST IT. MY HOPE WOULD BE THAT HAVING A NICE QUALITY LAUNDROMAT WILL PUSH SOME OF THE OLD ONES OUT. HOWEVER, MARGARET AND I WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT THAT. I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT REALLY HAPPENS, BUT THAT WOULD BE THE HOPES AND DREAMS, BUT ALSO THAT THAT AREA NEEDS SOME SOME LIFE. BREATHE BACK INTO IT AND IT NEEDS LESS VACANCIES FOR SURE. SO I DO APPRECIATE YOUR YOUR PRESENTATION. AND I THINK IT'LL BE I THINK IT'LL BE A GREAT ADDITION TO THAT SHOPPING STRIP.THEY JUST ADDED THE ACE HARDWARE. I THINK I GO TO THAT AREA NOW MORE AND ALSO ACROSS THE STREET THEY JUST GOT ROSS. AND SO YES, THANK IF THAT'S IF THAT WAS YOUR FAULT. THANK YOU.
OKAY. BECAUSE WE'RE WE'RE A ROSS GIRL. SO THERE'S THAT. THAT AREA IS GETTING A LOT OF NEW AND DIFFERENT THINGS THAT ARE DRAWING PEOPLE OVER THERE. AND LIKE, I MEAN, I GO TO THE ACE HARDWARE ALL THE TIME. AND BEFORE THAT I NEVER WENT OVER IN THAT AREA. SO I ANYTHING TO LIVEN IT UP A LITTLE BIT. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. THANK YOU SIR. MY FIRST QUESTION. YOU LIVE IN FLORIDA, RIGHT? I DO, I MOVED ABOUT EIGHT MONTHS AGO.
ARE YOU ARE YOU GOING TO BECOME THE FRANCHISEE I AM THIS IS MY FIRST FRANCHISE. I'M A RETIRED COMPUTER IT GUY OR QUASI RETIRED. AND I PICKED THIS AREA BECAUSE I LIVED HERE FOR NEARLY 20 YEARS AND I KNOW IT REASONABLY WELL. WOULD YOU GO BACK TO THAT ONE OF THOSE MAPS WHERE YOU HAD THE. THE CIRCLES? YEP. THERE ARE TWO OF THEM. ARE YOU THINKING OF THIS ONE OR THE OTHER ONE? THE OTHER ONE. YEAH. YEAH. OKAY. OKAY. ALL OF THOSE THAT YOU SEE CIRCLE, ARE THEY FUNCTIONING NOW. THEY ARE TO MY KNOWLEDGE, YES. I WAS IN THEM WITHIN THE LAST TWO MONTHS. AND WHAT WHAT WAS THEIR VOLUME? I DO NOT KNOW. OKAY. WHEN I WAS PHYSICALLY THERE THEY TYPICALLY HAVE BETWEEN 1 AND 5 PEOPLE IN THEM. AND TWO OF THEM HAD CLEANING PEOPLE. AND ONE OF THEM HAD SOMEONE SITTING IN THE BACK OF A CHAIR WHO SEEMED TO BE SECURITY OF SOME SORT. OKAY.
AND YOUR LOCATION IS NOT WITHIN ANY OF THOSE CIRCUITS RIGHT THERE. RIGHT. THE LOCATION WOULD BE THE EXACT CENTER OF THIS BULLSEYE RIGHT THERE. YEAH. BUCKINGHAM THERE. OKAY. 1400 WOULD BE YOUR ADDRESS. I CAN'T SAY I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THE ADDRESS IS OF THE SWEET. OKAY.
YEAH. WHAT? OKAY. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. MY LAST QUESTION IS. YOU SAID YOU SAID YOU'RE NOT INTERESTED IN THE MULTIFAMILY, BUT JUST THE RENTAL PROPERTY. WHAT'S WHAT'S THE RATIO OF RENTAL PROPERTIES IN THAT AREA? SO IF WE LOOK AT THIS MAP, WE THEY RANGE FROM THE BOTTOM, WHICH IS KIND OF YELLOWISH UP TO THE TOP WHICH IS BLUE. AND YOU CAN SEE THAT WITHIN THAT INITIAL RADIUS WE HAVE A GOOD AMOUNT OF PINK, WHICH IS 20% TO 50%, A LITTLE BIT OF BLUE. AS WE MOVE OUT TO THE TWO MILE RADIUS, WE SEE A LOT MORE BLUE. AND FINALLY THE THREE MILE RADIUS A LOT MORE BLUE AND PINK. THIS SHOPPING CENTER. AS I SAID, THIS IS ROUGHLY WHAT THE DRAW LOOKS LIKE NOW. SO WITHIN THAT THREE MILE RADIUS, THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE COMING TO THE SHOPPING CENTER NOW. AND YOU CAN SEE OF THE 75% WHO ARE COMING FROM WITHIN THAT THREE MILE RADIU ABOUT HALF ARE ACTUALLY MORE THAN A MILE AWAY. OKAY. NOW MY LAST QUESTION, HOW IS HOW IS THE THE TERM OF YOUR PRESCRIBED THE TERM OF 20 YEARS VERSUS 15 OR LESS? IS THAT
[03:00:12]
AFFECTING? TELL ME AGAIN HOW IS THAT AFFECTING. NOT SHOULD BE. IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD FIRST CONSIDER. BUT TELL ME AGAIN, HOW WOULD IT AFFECT YOUR ABILITY TO OPEN THIS PLACE? WELL, IT'S NOT SO MUCH THE LEASE ITSELF. IT'S THE AMOUNT OF TIME IT TAKES TO RECOVER THE INVESTMENT, REALLY TWO PARTS TO IT. THE FIRST IS THAT THE FUNDING ASSOCIATED WITH THIS IS TEN YEARS OF OPERATION, MEANING TEN YEARS FROM THE TIME WE OPEN THE DOOR UNTIL THE UNTIL WE CAN COMPLETELY PAY OFF THE LOAN. SO IF THE S&P WERE TO START, FOR EXAMPLE, TODAY, THEN IN THEORY I WOULD HAVE ROUGHLY NINE YEARS LEFT ON THE LEASE. I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO FUND IT. AND TO BE FRANK, I DO NOT HAVE THE CASH IN MY POCKET TO DO THIS. THE OTHER ISSUE IS SIMPLY THE AMOUNT OF MONEY WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO SPEND TO BRING THE FACILITIES UP TO SPEED. NO ONE'S BEEN IN THERE FOR 13 YEARS. THE AIR CONDITIONERS, I DON'T KNOW IF THEY FUNCTION. I KNOW THEY ALL NEED TO BE REPLACED. THE ELECTRICAL IS UNDERSIZED. PROBABLY HASN'T BEEN UPDATED SINCE LONG BEFORE MY KIDS WERE BORN. THE WATER NEEDS TO BE UPDATED. THE SEPTIC.EVERYTHING BASICALLY NEEDS TO BE BROUGHT UP TO SPEED AND THE SPEC, AND THAT'S GOING TO COST A LOT OF MONEY. THE AIR CONDITIONING UNITS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT THEMSELVES ARE GOING TO BE CLOSE TO $100,000. THEY HAVE A UP TO 40 YEAR LIFESPAN. SO HAVING A LONG TIME TO RECOVER THAT IS IMPORTANT TO US TO CONSIDER SOMETHING LESS THAN 20 YEARS, 15 YEARS, FOR EXAMPLE.
HOW WOULD THAT AFFECT YOU? MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT WHEN YOU SAY YOU UNDERSTAND, IT IS YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTION. ARE YOU GETTING THE MONEY FOR FROM TO OPEN THIS? I WOULD BE ABLE TO FINANCE? YES. IF I HAD A 15 YEAR. YUP, YOU WOULD BE. I WOULD BE ABLE TO THANK YOU. MAY I EXTEND THAT A LITTLE BIT? MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT I CAN REAPPLY FOR THE SUP AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE. YE YOU COULD NOT REAPPLY THAT I COULD REAPPLY AND THAT I COULD DO THAT. FOR EXAMPLE, 5 OR 7 YEARS OUT. THE OTHER KIND OF RELATED ISSUE, HAVING MADE SUCH A LARGE INITIAL INVESTMENT, THERE'S A CONCERN ABOUT WOULD I BE ABLE TO SELL IT SOMEDAY IN THE FUTURE, FOR EXAMPLE, WITH THE SUP, WOULD A CONTINUING SUP BE APPROVED? AND SO ON? MY LAST QUESTION IS WITH YOU BEING THE RESIDENT OF FLORIDA, WHO WOULD BE ON SITE MANAGING THIS, THERE WOULD BE MANAGERS, FULL TIME EMPLOYEES THERE WORKING FOR WHO THEY WOULD WORK FOR ME. YOU? YES. YEAH, OKAY. BUT THEY LIVE HERE. THEY WOULD LIVE HERE. OKAY. THAT'S INTERESTING. THANK YOU. MAYOR, WE PREFER THE EMPLOYEES ALL BE WITHIN A SHORT DISTANCE BECAUSE SOMETIMES THE MANAGERS IN PARTICULAR NEED TO BE THEIR OFF HOURS IF SOMETHING GOES WRONG. OKAY. ALL RIGHT.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU. SIR, I'M GONNA ASK MR. CITY ATTORNEY IF YOU COULD CLARIFY. ONE QUESTION THAT'S BEEN RAISED IS ABOUT THE. WHEN THE TIMELINE STARTS, IT WILL START IMMEDIATELY UPON PASSAGE. IMMEDIATELY, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY IN TWO WEEKS. SO IF COUNCIL APPROVES THE PLAN TONIGHT AND THEN APPROVES THE ORDINANCE IN TWO WEEKS WITH THE SUP, IT'LL BE EFFECTIVE THAT TUESDAY NIGHT. THANK YOU. SIR. OKAY. COUNCILMEMBER THOMAS, SO I DID A QUICK GOOGLE SEARCH OF SPEED QUEEN LAUNDROMAT. AND AS A FORMER IT PROFESSIONAL, I CAN TELL THAT THIS WAS DESIGNED BY A FORMER IT PROFESSIONAL. IT LOOKS VERY, VERY HIGH TECH. GOOGLE SAYS 33 SPEED QUEEN FRANCHISES IN THE US SO FAR, BUT OVER 800 OF THESE IN EUROPE. AND SO THIS IS A MODEL THAT SEEMS TO BE WORKING QUITE WELL. THAT'S NOW BEING COME INTO THE STATES. IS THAT HOW DID YOU COME ACROSS THIS FRANCHISE? HOW DID YOU DECIDE TO DO THIS? MR. MAYOR, THAT'S NOT RELEVANT TO THE DISCUSSION. NO. OKAY. BUT YOUR YOUR MODEL IS IS MUCH MORE OF A HIGH TECH MODEL WHERE THERE'S AN APP THEY PAY WITH THEIR PHONE, THAT KIND OF THING. RIGHT. AND YOU'RE YOU SAID YOUR ATM IS A REVERSE ATM. PUSH CASH IN, GET A CARD OUT AND PAY WITH THE CARD. IS THAT RIGHT? YES.
THAT'S CORRECT. OUR ORIGINAL MY GOING IN POSITION AS I SAID WAS SAFETY FOR YOUNG DAUGHTERS AND THEY WERE TELLING ME HORROR STORIES. AND SO THAT'S HOW I APPROACHED IT INITIALLY. AND SO THE CASHLESS OPERATION IS AN IMPORTANT PART OF THAT. YEAH. OKAY. THAT'S VERY GOOD FOR SECURITY AND WHY A LOT OF PLACES DO DO THAT. SO OKAY. WELL THIS THIS IS JUST THE PICTURES ON THE SPEED QUEEN WEBSITE. VERY ATTRACTIVE. CERTAINLY WOULD DRESS UP THIS
[03:05:03]
LOCATION BASED ON THE PICTURES WE'VE SEEN. SO I I'M IN FAVOR OF YOUR APPLICATION, SIR.THANKS FOR COMING TO GARLAND. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM LOVELL, THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS THIS PROPOSAL TO US. THE EXHIBITS THAT YOU'RE SHOWING THE OF THE ACTUAL BUSINESS STYLE, IS THAT WHAT YOU PLAN TO BUILD SOMETHING WITH IS WITH THAT KIND OF A LOOK ON THE OUTSIDE ALSO, YES. THE SINCE IT'S A FRANCHISE, IT'S VERY TIGHTLY THE VISUALS ARE VERY TIGHTLY CONTROLLED VISUALS, OPERATIONS, EMPLOYMENT, PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING IS VERY TIGHTLY CONTROLLED. SO WE'LL BE IN LINE WITH THOSE. YES. DID YOU DID YOU DISCUSS WITH THE CITY STAFF ABOUT THE SIGNAGE WHETHER THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING WE HAVE NOT? AND GIVEN THE CONVERSATIONS ABOUT SIGNAGE EARLIER TODAY, I'M SUITABLY WORRIED I'LL BE GETTING ON THAT IMMEDIATELY. OKAY. WELL, IF THIS DOES GO THROUGH, I WOULD I WOULD SAY THAT'D BE SOMETHING TO START ON. THANK YOU. ONE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT I HAVE WOULD BE FOR THE OUR CITY ATTORNEY. WITH THE SUP. CAN WE RESTRICT WHAT THE THAT NEEDS TO LOOK LIKE, THE EXHIBITS THAT ARE SHOWN OR SOMETHING RELATIVE TO THAT? WELL, THE COUNCIL AS YOU AS YOU ARE AWARE COUNCIL NOT TO IN THE NOT TOO DISTANT PAST HAD DECIDED THAT THEY WERE GOING TO REQUIRE DEVELOPMENT AS A POLICY TO BE CONCEPT IN NATURE AND NOT BE DETAILED IN NATURE. SO WHAT WOULD YOU BE ASKING FOR? BE SOMETHING THAT THE COUNCIL WOULD NEED TO APPROVE BECAUSE OF WHAT THE POLICY THEY PUT IN PLACE? OKAY, CONCEPT PLAN. THAT'S NOT SOMETHING WE CAN DO ON AN INDIVIDUAL ON THIS INDIVIDUAL. CITY COUNCIL COULD DO THAT. YES. OKAY. THAT COULD BE A RESTRICTION WE HAVE ON IT. IT WOULD BE HARD TO ENFORCE BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WITHOUT SOME VERY TIGHT LANGUAGE, I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY HOW I WOULD DRAFT THAT. I COULD SAY SIMILAR, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, I'M SURE WITH THE FRANCHISE HE HAS OPTIONS TO WHAT COMPONENTS TO THE DESIGN THAT HE CAN PUT IN THERE AND WHAT HE CAN'T. SO CAN IT BE RESTRICTED BETWEEN FRANCHISE? WE KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION BECAUSE YOUR ZONING THE LAND AND NOT THE NOT THE ZONING THE USE TO BUT YOU'RE ALSO IT'S IT GOES WITH THE LAND AND YOU CAN'T RESTRICT IT TO A BECAUSE WHAT HAPPENS IF SPEED QUEEN SOLD OUT TO ANOTHER CORPORATION. RIGHT. RIGHT. SO RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I'M IN FAVOR OF OF WHAT YOU'RE SHOWING US. I THINK THAT IT'S A, IT'S A, IT'S A BUSINESS THAT'S INSIDE THE PLACEMENT OF IT. IT'S INSIDE OF AN EXISTING COMPLEX. YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF INVESTMENT WITHIN THAT COMPLEX.
IT IS SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN VACANT SINCE 2015, 2013. AND THERE HAVE BEEN LAUNDRY USES IN PROXIMITY TO IT. IN THE PAST, THEY'VE GONE OUT OF BUSINESS, BUT THIS WOULD BE A NICE FRESH UPTAKE FOR IT. SO I AM IN FAVOR OF IT, BUT I'LL JUST WE HAD YOU HAD MENTIONED THAT YOU WERE IN FAVOR OF SOME TYPICAL JUST THE RESTRICTIONS I WAS SPEAKING OF EARLIER WITH THE EARLIER CASE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ALSO ADDING STANDARD CONVENIENCE VENDING. IS THAT CORRECT? IN FACT, THE THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT THAT I'VE SIGNED HAS SEVERAL COMPONENTS TO IT. IT VERY CAREFULLY DICTATES EVERY PRODUCT THAT CAN BE SOLD. IT CAN. IT IS RESTRICTED TO LAUNDRY AND CONVENIENCE VENDING. OKAY. AND I GUESS WHILE I'M AT IT, I SHOULD MENTION THAT SHOULD I VARY FROM THAT IN ANY WAY OR FAIL TO UPHOLD THE STANDARDS THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO COME IN AND TAKE OVER THE BUSINESS. AND SINCE THEY ARE IN FACT THE FINANCER OF THE BUSINESS, THEY ALSO HAVE A FINANCIAL INTEREST AND THEY HAVE THE POWER ASSOCIATED WITH IT. SO I WOULD BASICALLY BE I HATE TO USE THE WORD MERCY, BUT SUBJECT TO THEIR RULES FOR AT LEAST TEN YEARS. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. COUNCILMEMBER BASS THANK YOU MAYOR. AND I UNDERSTAND THAT WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WITH SOME YOU KNOW, WE'RE SPEAKING OF LAND USE, BUT WHEN A BUSINESS OWNER COMES BEFORE US AND WE TALK ABOUT THE THE TIME LENGTH OF AN SUP, IT'S RELATED TO THINGS FROM THEIR PERSPECTIVE, SUCH AS THEIR ROI, THE LOANS THAT THEY HAVE OUTSTANDING AS WELL AS LEASE AGREEMENTS. ALL OF THESE THINGS HAVE TIME CONSTRAINTS ASSOCIATED WITH THEM, AND THAT'S WHY WE NEED TO WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT, YOU KNOW, IF YOU GIVE SOMEONE AN SUP THAT'S SHORTER THAN ANY OF THOSE THINGS THAT THEY HAVE TO CONSIDER, THEN THAT'S PRETTY MUCH A DEATH SENTENCE FOR THEM,
[03:10:03]
AND IT MIGHT AS WELL NOT BE GRANTED AT ALL. SO I WILL BE IN FAVOR OF THE 20 YEAR SP FOR THIS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. MAYOR PRO TEM LUCK. SO YOU'RE POURING $1.4 MILLION INTO A SPACE. YOU'RE NOT GETTING ANY TENANT IMPROVEMENT INCENTIVES. I AM. I THINK IT'S IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF $210,000. OKAY, THE 1.4 IS ON TOP OF THAT. OKAY. AND YOU ARE AWARE THAT AN SCP IS ASSOCIATED TO LAND USE, NOT YOUR BUSINESS, I UNDERSTAND. YES, THAT WORRIES ME A LITTLE.ARE YOU FRANK? WELL, IT WORRIES ME TOO, BECAUSE WHEN IF YOU CLOSE AFTER TEN YEARS AND YOU'RE OUT OF YOUR FRANCHISE AGREEMENT AND YOU DON'T HAVE TO FOLLOW THAT ANYMORE, AND WE GIVE YOU A LONGER SCP, THEN WE ARE AT, WE ARE BEHOLDEN TO YOU TO EITHER MAINTAIN THE PROPERTY OR NOT TO SELL IT TO SOMEONE WHO WON'T. I CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND, SHOULD I PASS AND MY CHILDREN OR MY WIFE DON'T MAINTAIN IT IN THE APPROPRIATE WAY? OR SHOULD I SELL IT AT SOME POINT? I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY WOULD BE LEFT WITH WHOEVER IS ACTUALLY RUNNING IT.
PROBABLY THE BEST I CAN OFFER IS THAT IT IS A VERY EXPENSIVE ENTERPRISE. THIS IS NOT LIKE SOMEONE JUST OPENING, SAY, A PRIMARILY LABOR FOCUSED BUSINESS. THIS IS CAPITAL INTENSIVE. AND SO IT WOULD BE VERY, IN MY OPINION, VERY UNLIKELY THAT SOMEONE WOULD COME IN AND SPEND THAT KIND OF MONEY FOR A CAPITAL INTENSIVE BUSINESS AND NOT RUN IT IN A SIMILAR WAY. IT'S CERTAINLY POSSIBLE. I MEAN, WE COULD SEE A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE IN THE CLIENTELE OR THE SERVICES AROUND THE SHOPPING CENTER, BUT I WOULD EXPECT THAT IT WILL PROBABLY CONTINUE TO OPERATE IN THE SAME WAY. THESE MACHINES HAVE ROUGHLY UP TO A 40 YEAR LIFESPAN, BUT TYPICALLY BECAUSE OF TECHNOLOGY REQUIREMENTS AND THE COMPETITION IN THE MARKET, WE EXPECT TO REPLACE THEM ABOUT EVERY TEN YEARS, WHICH MEANS ABOUT TEN YEARS FROM NOW, I AM GOING TO BE LOOKING AT SPENDING THE MONEY TO BUY ALL NEW EQUIPMENT, REFURB EVERYTHING.
HOPEFULLY THE AIR CONDITIONERS WON'T NEED IT, BUT ALL NEW EQUIPMENT IN PLACE BECAUSE TO COMPETE IN THE MARKETPLACE YOU NEED TO HAVE THE NEW EQUIPMENT. EQUIPMENT PUT IN JUST 3 OR 4 YEARS AGO. CAN'T BE STARTED BY APP, STILL TAKES COINS OR PERHAPS A CREDIT CARD READER DIRECTLY ON THE MACHINE, AND THE CUSTOMERS ARE NOT AS INTERESTED IN THAT AS THEY ARE IN THE BRIGHT, SHINY NEW. RECENTLY REMODELED PLACE. THANK YO COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. YES, SIR. I WANT TO ASK YOU, GIVEN ALL ALL YOUR COMMENTARY, WOULD YOU WOULD YOU LIVE WITH 15 YEAR? EXCUSE ME, 15 YEAR? SUP? I WOULD, BASED ON THE WAY BEEN EXPLAINED TO YOU HERE. YES.
BASED ON IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN COMMISSION EXPLAINED TO ME THAT I CAN REQUEST A NEW SUV AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE BEFORE THE EXPIRATION OF THE EXISTING ONE. SO, FOR EXAMPLE, IF YOU WERE TO GRANT 15 YEARS, I COULD DO SO AT YEAR 14. SO YES. YES. RIGHT. WELL, WELL, THAT'S WHERE WHERE I AM RIGHT NOW. I WOULD SUPPORT YOU IN THIS BUSINESS WITH THE 15 YEAR TERM TIME PERIOD FOR AND THEN YOU COULD REQUEST A RENEWAL IN YEAR 14. RIGHT. THANK YOU. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I SEE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. MADAM SECRETARY. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM? YES WE DO. ALL RIGHT. WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR FIRST SPEAKER, DAVID KOHN? GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. SIR DAVID KAHNE, 840 DUDLEY MEADOWS LANE, HOUSTON, TEXAS. AND I AM DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE AND CONSTRUCTION, SPEED QUEEN LAUNDRY. WE ARE A PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANY BASED OUT OF RIPON, WISCONSIN. I'M PROUD TO SAY WE'VE GOT, I DON'T KNOW, 7 OR 8 SPEED QUEEN LAUNDRIES STORES IN THE DFW MARKET. AND IT'S PRESENTED TO ME AUT AN OPPORTUNITY TO COME TO GARLAND, TEXAS. I WENT TO THE SITE, LOOKED AT IT, AND I SAID, THIS IS EXACTLY WHERE WE WANT OUR NEXT DOOR. AND THAT'S HOW WE GOT TO GARLAND, TEXAS. WE DID NOT SELL BURY A FRANCHISE. WE AWARDED HIM A FRANCHISE. WHY? BECAUSE HE HAD A BACKGROUND.
THAT WAS WHAT WE FELT WOULD MAKE A VERY SUCCESSFUL FRANCHISEE. I'D RUN A BUSINESS
[03:15:05]
VERY SUCCESSFULLY AND UNDERSTOOD THE BUSINESS OF THE LAUNDRY SIDE IN THE CONVERSATIONS THAT WE HAD WITH HIM. WE ALSO HAVE BRAND STANDARDS. UNDERSTAND THAT THE QUESTIONS THAT YOU ASKED IS THAT, ARE WE GOING TO ALLOW THE SPEED QUEEN LAUNDRY TO TURN INTO A HODGEPODGE? NO OR NOT, WE WILL BE IN THAT STORE EVERY QUARTER GRADING HIM, MAKING SURE THAT IT'S UP TO OUR STANDARDS AND THAT HE'S FOLLOWING OUR RULES AND REGULATIONS. WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE SELLING ANY OF THE PARAPHERNALIA, ANY ITEMS THAT ARE GOING TO MAKE YOU UNCOMFORTABLE. AND AS YOU SAW AS I WALKED UP HERE, I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THE PREVIOUS PERSON THAT IF YOU DID PUT IN SOME OTHER ITEMS IN THERE THAT WE ALLOWED VENDING THE VENDING, BUT THAT Y'ALL GOT CAUGHT UP IN THAT BECAUSE WE DO HAVE SOFT DRINKS AND SNACKS ON SITE. IF STARBUCKS WERE IN THE LAUNDRY BUSINESS, THEY WOULD BUILD A STORE THAT WE BUILD, YOU KNOW? SO I BARRY SAID IT'S A SIZABLE INVESTMENT. MY COMPANY IS FINANCING IT. WE'VE GOT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN. GET A TEN YEAR AMORTIZATION BACK OUT OF THE EQUIPMENT. AND YOU'RE CORRECT ABOUT THE IT SIDE. IT WAS ALL DESIGNED BY IT, AND IT IS EVEN TO THIS DAY. AND THERE'S MORE STUFF COMING DOWN THE ROAD. AS YOU CAN IMAGINE, EVEN THE CAMERA SYSTEMS THAT WE HAVE IN OUR STORE ARE NOT THE KIND OF CAMERAS THAT YOU BUY AT COSTCO AND HOOK UP IN THE CORNER, BUT THEY ARE NOT FACIAL RECOGNITION. BUT IT'S VERY HIGH TECH, YOU KNOW? AND WHAT WE'RE SEEING IS THE OLD LAUNDROMATS ARE GOING AWAY AND THE NEW LAUNDROMATS THAT YOU SAW, NOT JUST US, BUT THEIRS IS THE WAY OF THE FUTURE. AND THAT'S WHERE WE ARE TODAY. THANK YOU SIR. MADAM SECRETARY, DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS? HOLD ON ONE SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. GOOD EVENING, SIR. SINCE YOU SINCE YOU REPRESENT THE AWARDEE, SO TO SPEAK. YES, SIR. 15 YEARS ON SP. CAN YOU LIVE WITH THAT? WELL, I MEAN ANYTHING. THAT KICKS THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD THAT DOESN'T GET US TO THE TO THE FINISH LINE AND, AND I SAY THAT BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE STRUCTURED THE LEASE WITH BERNARD AND WEITZMAN THAT WE'VE GOT, I THINK IT'S A TEN YEAR AND TWO, FIVE OPTIONS. AND SO WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO MAKE SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, WE KNOW WHAT WE'RE DEALING WITH TODAY. WE DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE DEALING WITH 15 YEARS FROM NOW. YOU MAY NOT BE ON THE COUNCIL THERE. AND SO IT WOULD BE A LOT EASIER TO GIVE THE 20 YEARS. NOW, I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM, BUT THAT, YOU KNOW, THE LEASE IS WHERE IT IS. AND AT YEAR TEN, AND THIS IS WHAT WE DID IN ATLANTA, WAS WE HAD STORES THAT WERE COMING ON TEN YEARS. WHAT DID WE DO WITH THE OLD EQUIPMENT? WE PULLED IT OUT, PUT NEW EQUIPMENT IN BECAUSE THE TECHNOLOGY CHANGED. AND SO.AT YEAR TEN, IF WE SIT THERE AND HAVE A 15 AND WE'VE ALREADY BURNED, WHATEVER, NINE MONTHS FROM TODAY JUST TO GET THE STORE OPEN, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THE PERMITTING PROCESS IS GOING TO BE GOING THROUGH YOUR CITY. THEY'RE GOING TO ASK A LOT OF QUESTIONS. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF ANSWERS, A LOT OF BACK AND FORTH, AND THEN WE HAVE TO DO THE CONSTRUCTION. AND THE CONSTRUCTION IS NOT A 30 DAY CONSTRUCTION. IT'S PROBABLY 4 TO 6 MONTHS. IRVING. WE OPENED UP A FEW MONTHS AGO. IT TOOK US SIX MONTHS TO GET GET THROUGH. SO SO THE 15 YEARS IT GETS US TODAY, WE WALK OUT OF HERE, I'M ABLE TO GO BACK TO OUR CORPORATION AND SAY, LOOK, WE'VE GOT THE FINANCING COVERED. WE GOT ALL THAT COVERED. BUT THE 20 YEAR WILL WILL GET US TO WHERE WE NEED TO BE AT THE END OF THE DAY. WELL, WHAT DO YOU THINK THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED TEN YEARS? I THINK THEY DID 5 TO 8. AND SO THEY HAD A RANGE 5 TO 8. RIGHT. AND I THINK THAT THE PROCESS IS LIKE COMMISSIONER BASS BROUGHT UP IS THAT. THE PLANNING
[03:20:01]
COMMISSION UNDERSTANDS PLANNING. RIGHT. THAT'S WHAT THEY KNOW. BUT WHAT THEY DIDN'T TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION IS WHAT THE FINANCING IS AND WHAT THE LEASES LEASE IS. AND SO AND WHAT THE INVESTMENT IS AND HOW TO RECOUP THAT INVESTMENT. AGAIN, IT'S A VERY SIZABLE INVESTMENT AND VARIES PERSONALLY ON THE HOOK FOR IT, YOU KNOW. AND SO HE DIDN'T GO ANYWHERE. YEAH. AND YOU KNOW SO AND WE REALLY WE HAVEN'T HAD ANY SPEED QUEEN LAUNDRIES THAT HAVE FAILED. YEAH. WE'REREERY WE DO A GREAT JOB ON SITE SELECTION AND ALSO ON FRANCHISEE SELECTION. YEAH. YEAH. SO WHAT WHAT NUMBER CAN YOU LIVE WITH AS HIS AWARD. OUR SPONSOR. YES SIR I THINK TWO TWO NUMBERS 15 YEARS GETS US TODAY. 20 YEARS GETS US WHERE WE DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT WHAT'S THE NEXT COUNCIL GOING TO BE LIKE IN IN 12, 13, 14 YEARS. AND SO WHAT WE DON'T WANT IS LET'S SAY YOUR TEN COMES AROUND, WE WANT TO REPLENISH THE EQUIPMENT, REPLACE IT. RIGHT. BUT THEN YOU SIT THERE AND SAY, WELL, WE'VE ONLY GOT 4 OR 5 YEARS LEFT ON OUR SUPPLY. SO THEN WE SAID, OKAY, WE GOT TO GO IN FRONT OF THE COUNCIL AND, YOU KNOW, LET ME INTERRUPT YOU. HE JUST SAID YOU REPLACED. IF YOU REPLACED REPLACING EQUIPMENT FOUR YEARS AVERAGE, RIGHT. FOUR YEARS TO REPLACE THE WASHING MACHINES, THE THAT, THAT THAT KIND OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT THAT RUNS THE LIFE OF THE, THE LAUNDROMAT.OKAY. SO SO GIVEN THAT, TELL ME WHAT I KNOW. YOU SAID WHAT CAN YOU YOU DEFINE YOU THE FINANCING. RIGHT? RIGHT. WHAT CAN YOU LIVE WITH? HE'S TOLD ME WHAT HE CAN LIVE WITH. WHAT CAN YOU LIVE WITH? OKAY, SO IT'S NOT FOUR YEARS. IT'S GOING TO BE IN TEN YEARS AFTER YOU OPEN.
PROBABLY GOING TO REPLACE THE EQUIPMENT. OKAY. SO IF YOU HAVE 15 YEARS FROM TODAY IT'LL GIVE US SAY 14 YEARS. SO THEN YOU ONLY GOT FOUR YEARS TO TO TO FINANCE THE OTHER EQUIPMENT.
YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT. SO IN TEN YEARS YOU ONLY GOT FOUR YEARS LEFT ON YOUR SCP. AND SO YOU'RE LIKE, WELL, YOU KNOW WHAT? LET'S JUST DON'T CHANGE OUT THE EQUIPMENT UNTIL WE KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THE COUNCIL WILL ALLOW US AND NOT ALLOW US TO DO SO. IF YOU GO 20 YEARS, THAT GETS US REALLY TO MIRRORS THE LEASE AND WE'LL BE FINE ON THE FINANCING. THAT'S THAT'S THAT OR WASHATERIA FOR 20 YEARS. THAT'S, THAT'S THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT'S THAT THAT NORMAL BUT NORMAL AS FAR AS THE SHOP IS CONCERNED. AND 1,000,006 INVESTMENT IS NOT THAT AVERAGE EITHER. RIGHT, RIGHT. AND SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. YOU KNOW, IT'S A IT'S IT'S NOT THE OLD LAUNDROMAT OF 1500 2000FT. OKAY. THIS IS THIS IS WHAT ARE WE, 4000, 5000, 4800FT, YOU KNOW, A 4800 FOOT STORE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. AND I APPRECIATE WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM. AND THOSE ARE GREAT QUESTIONS. YOU KNOW, YOU'RE LIKE, OKAY, WHAT CAN WE GIVE THEM TO GET THEM WHERE THEY NEED TO BE WITHOUT GIVING THEM TOO MUCH MORE THAN WHAT THEY NEED? RIGHT, RIGHT. AND SO, SO 15 YEARS WE WALK OUT OF HERE TODAY. GOOD. WE'RE OFF TO THE RACES, BUT WE'RE STILL GOING TO HAVE A PROBLEM DOWN THE ROAD.
YOU KNOW, AND LET ME SAY THAT IN A PREVIOUS LIFE I OWNED BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO STORES. I WAS A FRANCHISEE, I WAS THE LARGEST FRANCHISEE IN THE COUNTRY. AND I REMEMBER TRYING TO GET A VARIANCE ONE FOR SIGN AND ONE FOR A PARKING. AND I WENT TO A CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND THEY AGAIN, THEY THOUGHT THAT THE VIDEO STORE WAS THE OLD 15 SMALL VIDEO STORE, YOU KNOW, WITH THE MOVIES IN THE BACK. THEY HAD NEVER SEEN A BLOCKBUSTER BEFORE. AND SO I'M SITTING THERE TRYING TO EXPLAIN TO THEM WHAT WHAT THE BLOCKBUSTER WAS 6000 FOOT BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO STORE THAT STARTED HERE IN THE DALLAS FORT WORTH AREA. PEOPLE IN DALLAS KNEW THE PEOPLE IN MISSISSIPPI AND ALABAMA DIDN'T. AND SO BUT ONCE WE GOT OPEN, EVERYBODY'S, HEY, PUT ONE OVER HERE. WE WANT ONE OVER HERE, WE WANT ONE OVER HERE. AND THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED WITH SPEED QUEEN IS, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. PEOPLE TALKED TO ME AT THE REAL ESTATE CONFERENCES. COME TO GARLAND, YOU KNOW, WE'RE EXCITED TO BE HERE. RIGHT? THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU SIR. DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM, MR. KHAN. YES, SIR. THANK YOU FOR BEING
[03:25:05]
HERE. THIS IS THANK YOU FOR HELPING TO HELP US UNDERSTAND A LITTLE MORE OF THE CONCEPT. AND YOU HAVE A VERY, VERY COMPELLING PRODUCT. IT LOOKS GREAT. I HAVE A QUESTION FOR OUR CITY ATTORNEY. IS IS THERE ANYTHING THAT WOULD KEEP SOMEONE FROM AT YEAR TEN RIGHT BEFORE THEY CAPITALIZE ON NEW EQUIPMENT? DO THEY GO TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT THAT MOMENT AND APPLY FOR AN UPDATE TO THEIR SUV? SURE, THEY COULD DO IT IN YEAR FIVE. THEY COULD DO IT IN YEAR THREE. I THINK IT'S TWO YEAR LIMITATION ON A REZONING, MAYBE A YEAR, ONE YEAR. SO THEY COULD DO IT AT ANY POINT. IT WOULD BE UP TO THAT PARTICULAR COUNCIL AND WHETHER OR NOT THEY WANT TO EXTEND THAT SUV OR NOT. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THAT'S WHAT I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY. I WANTED TO THANK YOU ALSO FOR BEING HERE. I, I HAVE LEANED VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF THIS PROJECT. IT'S BEAUTIFUL. IT LOOKS REALLY NICE. AND I HOPE IT LOOKS JUST LIKE WAS PRESENTED. WELL, LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING YOYOU A AT THE RIBBON CUTTING. AWESOME. THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBER BASS. THANK YOU. AND I KNOW THERE'S BEEN QUITE A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT SPEED LIMIT. AND I WANTED TO POINT OUT THAT THE, THE OUR POLICY GUIDELINES ARE NOT RELATED TO USE OF A LAUNDROMAT. OUR POLICY GUIDELINES ARE RELATED TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. SO THE RECOMMENDATION THAT WE HAVE APPROVED THE RECOMMENDATION FOR POLICY GUIDELINES OF 5 TO 8 YEARS IS RELATED TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS, NOT RELATED TO THE USE OF A LAUNDROMAT, AND PLAN COMMISSION ACTUALLY RECOMMENDED A TEN YEAR TIME PERIOD. I KNOW THERE WAS A HAD DISCREPANCY ON THAT, BUT PLANNING COMMISSION ACTUALLY RECOMMENDED A TEN YEAR TIME PERIOD. BUT I'M GOING TO REPEAT THAT. I RECOMMEND A 20 YEAR. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. SEE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MADAM SECRETARY. DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM? YES. ONE MORE, BERNARD SHAW. GOOD EVENING ONCE AGAIN. BERNARD SHAW, 3102 MAPLE AVENUE, DALLAS, TEXAS. SO I WANTED TO JUST ADDRESS A COUPLE OF THINGS. THE PREVIOUS OPERATOR THAT WE HAD IN THE SHOPPING CENTER, WE GAVE THEM OPPORTUNITY, I THINK COUNCIL MEMBER DUTTON SAID IT WAS A IT WAS A IT WAS A SHOW. WE'RE JUST GOING TO LEAVE OUT THE FIRST WORD. BUT IT WAS A SHOW, SO WE GAVE THEM OPPORTUNITY AFTER OPPORTUNITY TO GET THEIR ACT TOGETHER. AND AS A LANDLORD, YOU JUST DON'T WANT TO, NOT IF YOU HAVE A TENANT, YOU WANT TO TRY TO WORK WITH THEM. BUT WE COULDN'T WORK WITH THEM ANYMORE. AND SO WE MADE THE DECISION THAT WE NEEDED TO GO IN A DIFFERENT DIRECTION. AND THAT'S WHEN I MET WITH DAVID. AND TO TALK ABOUT OPTIONS. AND WE BRING SOMETHING NEW, SOMETHING FRESH TO THE SHOPPING CENTER. SO THAT'S HOW WE GOT HEREE. NOW, NOT IN A MILLION YEARS DID I THINK THAT SINCE WE HAD LAUNDROMAT THERE FOR IT WAS OVER 30 YEARS THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO LEASE TO A LAUNDROMAT? THAT CAME AS A COMPLETE SHOCK. AND SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE PUSHING FOR 20. BUT AGAIN, I STATED BEFORE, I DON'T UNDERSTAND THE ANGST AROUND LAUNDROMATS, AND I'M PLEASE HEAR ME OUT. THIS IS NOT TO BE ANTAGONISTIC, AND I'M BUT I'M TRYING TO JUST PAINT A PICTURE. THE CITY OF GARLAND AND OTHER CITIES HAVE MORE RESTAURANTS THAN ANYTHING LIKE LAUNDROMATS, AND THEY'RE ALL CLOSE TOGETHER. AND SOME PRESENT, WELL, SOME DON'T PRESENT WELL, SOME HAVE GOOD FOOD, SOME DON'T. BUT THERE IS NO SOUP FOR RESTAURANT.THERE'S ABSOLUTELY NO RUSH. BUT, YOU KNOW, YOU'VE PROBABLY EATEN SOME BAD FOOD JUST LIKE I HAVE, AND YOU'VE PROBABLY SEEN SOME DIVES LIKE I HAVE. AND WE DON'T GOVERN WHETHER WE'RE GOING TO ALLOW RESTAURANT TO GO INTO THE SHOPPING CENTER. SO I'M, I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED ABOUT HOW WE GOT TO THIS POINT WHERE WE'RE SAYING THAT IT'S NOT A RIGHT FOR LAUNDROMAT. WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT SOMEONE THAT'S SELLING, YOU KNOW, WHAT IS IT, CANNABIS. I GUESS THAT'S THE TERM. THAT'S THE THAT'S THE THING. NOW, WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT CANNABIS. WE'RE NOT EVEN WE'RE NOT EVEN TALKING ABOUT BEER AND WINE OR ALCOHOL. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A LEGITIMATE USE FOR SOMEBODY THAT NEEDS TO DO LAUNDRY. AND IT'S GOING TO START OUT REALLY, REALLY NICE WITH RESTAURANTS. AGAIN, WE WE MANAGE A LOT OF SHOPPINING CENTERS ACROSS STATE OF TEXAS, RESTAURANTS. THEY GO INTO DISREPAIR. DOLLAR STORES GO INTO DISREPAIR. GROCERY STORES GO INTO DISREPAIR. A LOT OF USES GO INTO DISREPAIR. SO I'M NOT IT'S IT'S REALLY I WAS TRYING TO UNDERSTAND HOW WE GOT HOW CITY OF GARLAND GOT HERE, TO NOT ALLOW LAUNDROMAT TO GO
[03:30:09]
INTO A SHOPPING CENTER, WHICH IS A PERFECTLY FINE USE IN TERMS OF TENANT MIXED STRATEGIES. ESPECIALLY IN A SHOPPING CENTER LIKE OURS. I SO I'M I'M JUST CONFUSED. I, I AS A LANDLORD, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO HAVE IT BY RIGHT NOT BY SUP AND ALLOW THE MARKET TO DICTATE IF THE LAUNDROMAT GOES OUT BECAUSE THERE'S COMPETITION AND THEY CAN'T MAKE IT. SO THAT'S ALL I'VE GOT. I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS FOR YOU, SIR. OKAY. MAYOR PRO TEM LUCK. SO I URGE YOU TO DRIVE DOWN CENTERVILLE FROM 635 TO SATURN. TURN LEFT. KIND OF. WELL, YOU CAN'T TURN LEFT OFF OF THERE, BUT GO AROUND SATURN AND AND NORTHWEST HIGHWAY. JUST TRAVEL MY DISTRICT AND THEN YOU MIGHT UNDERSTAND WHY THERE ARE SOME USES THAT I AM OPPOSED TO. SO THAT'S WHY. BECAUSE 20 YEARS AGO, WHEN THOSE USES LIKE LAUNDROMATS WERE ALLOWED BY RIGHT, THEY HELPED PROPEL SHOPPING CENTERS THAT ARE REALLY MAJOR PAIN POINTS FOR MY RESIDENTS NOW. SO THAT'S WHY. THERE'S THE ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION. AND I'M NOT GIVING YOU ANY PUSHBACK. I GET IT, BUT, WELL, APPARENTLY YOU DON'T, BECAUSE YOU KEEP ASKING WHY, WHY, WHY? WELL, THAT'S WHY. BECAUSE THE THE FORMER. RIGHT? I MEAN, WE CAN RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE. I'M JUST REAL ESTATE IS A IT'S A IT'S AN ANIMAL THAT TAKES A LONG TIME TO TURN THE PAGE RIGHT AND TURN THE CORNER. WHEN IS THE LAST TIME YOU DID A FACADE IMPROVEMENT IN THE SHOPPING CENTERS THAT YOU'RE HAVING A HARD TIME FILLING? MR. MAYOR, THAT'S NOT REALLY THE QUESTION IS NOT RELEVANT. YEAH, I YOU YOU'RE TAKING IT PERSONALLY. I'M NOT I'M NOT TRYING TO MAKE THIS PERSONAL. I'M JUST I WAS JUST SIMPLY ASKING THE QUESTION. I ANSWERED, TRYING TO BE ANTAGONISTIC. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO. OKAY. DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM I. MR. SHAW, THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN TO TESTIFY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR THE YOUR THE THE LEASING AGENT FOR THIS PROPERTY, CORRECT? YES. SO, MANAGER, I'M RESPONSIBLE FOR LEASING, CONSTRUCTION, PROPERTY MANAGEMENT. AND YOU AND YOU ACTIVELY WENT AND SOUGHT THIS THIS OPERATOR. AND THIS IS A THIS IS A BEAUTIFUL OPERATION. I REALLY I REALLY APPRECIATE IT. AND WERE YOU ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR AND THIS MAY NOT BE ON TOPIC, BUT FOR THE TRUE VALUE, IS THAT PART OF IT WHERE HACIENDA BUFFET IS COMING IN? THEY'RE STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION. WE'RE WORKING ON THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ROSS, ACROSS THE STREET. YEAH, I LIKE THE I LIKE THE THE DIRECTION THAT IT'S GOING IN ON THAT. SO IT'S LOOKING VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. I JUST WANTED TO THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS TO DISTRICT EIGHT AND HOPE IT LOOKS LIKE WITH THE RENDERINGS LOOK LIKE WE'RE GOING TO PUSH FOR IT RED AND BOLD AND ALL THAT COOL STUFF. YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO WORK ON THIS WORK WITH CITY ON THE SIGN BECAUSE I KNOW WE'RE PRETTY SENSITIVE. THE LANDLORD HAS A SIGN CRITERIA TOO, SO IT'S GOING TO IT NEEDS THAT SIGN. LOOKS PRETTY COOL. YEAH.THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU SIR. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. YEAH, I YOU GIVING US MORE HISTORY AND WE REALLY DON'T NEED THAT TONIGHT. I NEED YOU TO SPEAK TO THIS PROJECT AND THAT'S IT FOR US THAT WE'RE TRYING TO DELIBERATE AND CONSIDER. AND YOU'VE GIVEN US HISTORY. BUT I'LL, I'LL I'LL GIVE YOU ANOTHER TOURIST TOURIST SUGGESTION NEXT TIME YOU GO DOWN TO THE SHOPPING CENTER AT I-30 AND BROADWAY. RIGHT. YOU'RE LOOKING FOR SOMETHING FERTILE GROUND. SEE WHAT YOU CAN DO THERE. OKAY. ALRIGHT, ALRIGHT. SO THAT'S ALL.
AND I'LL JUST LEAVE IT WITH YOU. ALRIGHT, ALRIGHT, ALRIGHT. APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU MAYOR.
THANK YOU SIR, I DON'T HAVE ANY THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE IT. MADAM SECRETARY, DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS SIGNED UP FOR THIS? NO, SIR, WE DO NOT. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE. DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM, THIS IS IN YOUR DISTRICT, SIR. WELL, THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. COUNCIL, I WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE THAT WE APPROVE THE REQUEST WITH THE ADDITIONAL WITH THE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS THAT I HAD
[03:35:04]
MENTIONED, WHICH IS LAUNDRY RELATED. IT'S RESTRICTED TO LAUNDRY RELATED BUSINESS AND STANDARD CONVENIENCE VENDING. AND I WOULD LIKE THAT SUP TO BE FOR 15 YEARS. THE MOTION HAD.COUNCILMEMBER BASS YOU SECOND THAT MOTION. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM COUNCIL BEFORE YOU? I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY I SEE MANY PARALLELS BETWEEN THIS CASE AND THE PREVIOUS CASE AND ZONING ITEM Z 2523 THAT WE HAD FOR OUR SEPTEMBER 2ND, 2025 MEETING. THAT WAS THE CASE. IF YOU RECALL, WE HAD A ANOTHER PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANY WHO WAS WILLING TO COME AND INVEST SEVERAL MILLION DOLLARS INTO A VERY DIFFICULT SITE. AND YOU'VE HEARD MANY OF THE SAME FACT PATTERNS HERE. AND THAT WAS THE MAVIS TIRES THAT WAS OFF OF ARAPAHOE ROAD. AND SOMEONE WILLING TO INVEST THAT MUCH MONEY INTO IT. I WOULD HOPE THAT WE'D BE WILLING TO GIVE THEM A FULL 20 YEAR ESP THAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR. IT'S RARE THAT WE SEE THIS KIND OF INVESTMENT IN THESE KIND OF WORN DOWN SHOPPING CENTERS. AND WHAT I'VE HEARD FOR THE PAST SEVERAL MINUTES AND SPEAKERS IS JUST WE'RE TRYING TO BEAT THEM DOWN, TRYING TO GET IT APPROVED, YOU KNOW, CHANGE IT. BUT THIS IS CHANGING THAT SHOPPING CENTER. YOU LOOK IN THERE THAT WHATABURGER IS DESPERATE NEED OF AN UPDATE. MY CAREER I'VE BUILT WHATABURGERS THAT ONE DOES NOT MEET THEIR CURRENT STANDARDS. IT'S VERY SMALL AND VERY OLD INSIDE THE OTHER SHOPPING, OTHER SHOPS IN THE AREA. THIS COULD BE A THE KINDLING TO START THE FIRE TO REFRESH THAT WHOLE THING. SO I WISH WE WOULD CONSIDER A LONGER SUPP, BUT THAT IS THE MOTION I HAVE ON THE TABLE RIGHT NOW.
AND AS YOUR MAYOR, I DON'T MAKE MOTIONS OR MAKE AMENDMENTS. SO THAT'S JUST MY INPUT ON THIS ITEM. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A REQUEST TO SPEAK. COUNCILMEMBER THOMAS. YES, MR. MAYOR, I'D LIKE TO MOVE THAT. WE AMEND THE MOTION TO ALLOW FOR A 20 YEAR SP. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE AMENDMENT? MAKE A COMPLEX. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE SAUSAGE HERE.
YES, SIR. COUNCILMEMBER ART, YOU ARE IN THE QUEUE, SIR. EXCUSE ME, DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM AND MY BUTTON. THERE WE GO. THERE WE GO. I HAVE NO I HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE 20 YEAR SP.
MY ONLY INTENTION WAS TO TRY AND BALANCE THE SENTINTS OF STAFF AND AND WHAT THEIR NEEDS ARE. IF THAT'S THE IF THAT IS THE PREVAILING FEELING OF THE COUNCIL THAT WE DON'T EVEN HAVE TO HAVE A VOTE ON IT. I WOULD BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO AMEND MY MOTION. ALL RIGHT, SIR, BUT I HAVE A MOTION A SECOND FOR THAT AMENDMENT. I'D HAVE TO HAVE THE SECOND AND THE MAKER PULL THEIR MOTION, THEIR AMENDMENTS. COUNCILMEMBER THOMAS, DO YOU PULL YOUR ORIGINAL. MOTION? I WILL PULL MY AMENDMENT. VERY GOOD. AND DOES THE SECOND CONCUR? ALL RIGHT. WE'RE BACK TO THE ORIGINAL. ALL RIGHT. AND WE WILL. CAN YOU RESTATE YOUR MOTION, SIR? OKAY. I WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE WE APPROVE THE REQUEST. AS WITH THE. WITH THE WITH THE CHANGES THAT I HAD EXPRESSED BEFORE, WHICH WOULD BE THAT THE BUSINESS WOULD BE RESTRICTED TO LAUNDRY RELATED SALES AND ALSO STANDARD CONVENIENCE VENDING. AND THAT WOULD BE FOR A PERIOD OF 20 YEARS. AND DOES THE SECOND. MR. EXCUSE ME, COUNCILMEMBER BASS, CONCUR. VERY GOOD DISCUSSION ON THAT MOTION. SEEING NONE. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE PREPARE THE VOTE FOR THIS ITEM? AND THAT ITEM PASSES 7 TO 2 WITH MAYOR PRO TEM AND COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS IN OPPOSITION. WELCOME TO GARLAND, SIR. NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS CITIZEN COMMENTS. MADAM
[ CITIZEN COMMENTS]
SECRETARY, DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS SIGNED UP? YES WE DO. WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL OUR FIRST SPEAKER, CARL SMITH? MR. SMITH, YOU KNOW HOW THIS WORKS. NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES, SIR. AND IF YOU GIVE ME ONE SECOND, I APOLOGIZE. I GOT TO READ MY LITTLE SCRIPT HERE ABOUT THIS, THAT MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WISH TO ADDRESS. ISSUES NOT ON THE MEETING AGENDA MAY HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. HOWEVER, ACCORDING TO THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, COUNCIL IS PROHIBITED FROM DISCUSSING ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. PAUL[03:40:05]
SMITH 2216. RACHEL GRAY I'D LIKE TO THANK THE COUNCIL MAYOR FOR THEIR VOTE TONIGHT. I SPEAK FOR MYSELF AND OUR MERRY BAND OF RAGTAG CRUSADERS, SO TO SPEAK. BUT WE APPRECIATE THAT YOU'RE YOU'VE ALLOWED THE VOTERS TO BE THE FINAL ARBITER OF THIS ISSUE. AND WE JUST WE JUST AS A GROUP, WANTED TO THANK EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU FOR. THAT'S IT. THANK YOU, SIR.THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? ALL
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.