[00:00:07]
NOVEMBER 9TH MEETING OF THE PLAN COMMISSION. THIS IS OUR CUSTOM. WE START OUR MEETINGS WITH A PRAYER AND A PLEDGE. YOU'RE INVITED TO JOIN US WHETHER YOU DO OR NOT. NO WAY AFFECTS THE DECISIONS OF THIS COMMISSION. SO IF YOU CARE TO JOIN ME, DEAR HEAVENLY FATHER, WE THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO GET TOGETHER AND HOPEFULLY MAKE THE BEST DECISIONS POSSIBLE FOR THE CITY OF GARLAND AND ITS CITIZENS. WE THANK YOU FOR ALL THE FIRST RESPONDERS AND THEIR FAMILIES WHO HAVE TO PUT UP WITH THE KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY'RE FAMILY IS IN DANGER EVERY DAY, AND OUR ARMED SERVICES AND THEIR FAMILIES. AND WE ASK YOU FOR THE WISDOM TO MAKE THE BEST DECISIONS POSSIBLE TONIGHT FOR US. IN YOUR NAME WE PRAY. AMEN.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
WELL, GOOD EVENING AND THANK YOU FOR COMING OUT TONIGHT. IF YOU PLAN TO SPEAK TONIGHT, I ALREADY HAVE ONE SPEAKER CARD. IF ANYBODY ELSE WISHES TO SPEAK, PLEASE FILL ONE OF THESE OUT AND HAND IT TO THE PLAN COMMISSION SECRETARY, AND WE'LL CALL YOU UP. WHEN YOU COME TO THE MICROPHONES, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. WE NEED THAT FOR THE OFFICIAL RECORD.
APPLICANTS WILL BE GIVEN 15 MINUTES TO PRESENT THEIR CASE. OTHER SPEAKERS WILL BE ALLOWED THREE MINUTES. BUT IF YOU'RE SPEAKING FOR A GROUP SUCH AS A HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION, WE DO ALLOW MORE TIME. AND AFTER EVERYBODY'S SPOKEN, IF THE APPLICANT WANTS TO COME BACK UP AND RESPOND TO ANY ISSUES BROUGHT UP, WE ALLOW THEM TO DO THAT. SO PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME
[a. October 26, 2026 Plan Commission Minutes]
AND ADDRESS. WE'LL JUMP RIGHT INTO OUR AGENDA. ITEM ONE A CONSIDERATION OF THE OCTOBER 26TH, 2026 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES. COMMISSIONER ABEL, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE, AS PRESENTED AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER JENKINS. SEE NO DISCUSSION. SO TAKE A FEW SECONDS HERE AND. AND THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ALL RIGHT. FIRST PUBLIC HEARING[a. Z 26-26 Trak Group Inc. (District 6)]
ITEM ITEM TWO A HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF TRACK GROUP INC.REQUEST APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PROVISION FOR FUEL PUMPS. RETAIL ON PROPERTY ZONED COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT AND ASSOCIATED CONCEPT PLAN. THIS SITE IS LOCATED AT 3420 WEST WALNUT STREET. GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING CHAIR AND ALL THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS.
THIS IS THE PLANNER WITH THE CITY. AS MENTIONED, THE. THE REQUEST IS FOR A SPECIFIC USE PROVISION FOR A FUEL PUMPS RETAIL USE ON A PROPERTY ZONED COMMUNITY RETAIL. AND. 3420 WEST WALNUT STREET IS. THE ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY WHICH IS AT. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WEST WALNUT STREET AND SOUTH JUPITER ROAD AND IS WITHIN COUNCIL DISTRICT SIX. THE PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 0.483 ACRE IN SIZE AND IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A CONVENIENCE STORE AND A FUEL STATION. IT IS ZONED A COMMUNITY RETAIL CR AND THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE ALSO ZONED CR ON THE NORTHWEST. ON THE NORTH SIDE ACROSS WEST WALNUT, WE GET TO SEE AUTOMOBILE REPAIR BUSINESS AND A RESTAURANT ON THE WEST SIDE.
I'M SORRY. ON THE SOUTH SIDE, ACROSS THE CREEK THERE IS A CELL PHONE STORE AND THERE IS A LOAN AGENCY LOCATED IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY AND TO THE WEST, ACROSS SOUTH JUPITER, THERE IS ANOTHER CELL PHONE STORE. UNDER GDC. THE EXISTING CONVENIENCE STORE IS PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND. HOWEVER, THE FUEL PUMPS USE REQUIRES AN SUV. THE SITE CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 2100 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF CONVENIENCE STORE AND A FUEL CANOPY, AND EXISTING WITH EXISTING SIX FUEL PROVIDED FROM WEST WALNUT FROM THE. FROM THE NORTH SIDE AND ALSO SOUTH JUPITER TO THE WEST SIDE. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE GARLAND COMPREHENSIVE
[00:05:04]
PLAN DESIGNATES THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS DESIGNATION BASICALLY ENVISIONS A HIGHER DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, POTENTIALLY INCORPORATING VERTICAL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT THAT COMPLEMENTS THE SURROUING AREA OR INTRODUCES A NEW CHARACTER. THE EXISTING FUEL STATION PRIMARILY SERVES THE AUTOMOBILE TRAFFIC.THEREFORE, STAFF FINDS. THE. STAFF FINDS THAT CONTINUING THE FUEL PUMPS RETAIL USE WOULD NOT ADVANCE THE HIGHER DENSITY, MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ENVISIONED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THESE ARE SOME SIDE PICTURES SHOWING THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE PROPERTY FROM DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS. THERE IS LIKE A SMALL HISTORY TO THIS SIDE. THE CITY COUNCIL ORIGINALLY APPROVED AN SUP FOR FUEL PUMPS IN THE YEAR 1998 FOR A PERIOD OF 20 YEARS, AND WHICH GOT EXPIRED IN THE YEAR 2018. ALTHOUGH THE BUSINESS CONTINUED OPERATING, THE APPLICANT APPLIED FOR A NEW SUP IN JANUARY 2020 FOR. BUT IT GOT APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL IN JULY 2025 WITH A TIME PERIOD OF ONE YEAR, WHICH IS WHICH BASICALLY EXPIRED IN THE YEAR IN 2026. THAT APPROVAL REQUIRED ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE. MEDIANS ACROSS THE PROPERTY. YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THAT LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS HAS BEEN MET BY THE APPLICANT. YOU CAN SEE THEM IN THE PICTURES RIGHT NOW. THIS IS THE CONCEPT PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT, WHICH BASICALLY REFLECTS THE EXISTING SITE CONFIGURATION, INCLUDING CONVENIENCE STORE FUEL DISPENSERS OR PARKING SPACES, DRIVE AISLES AND ACCESS POINTS.
AS A PART OF THIS REQUEST, THE APPLICANT PROPOSED PROPOSED THAT THERE WOULD BE NO BUILDING EXPANSION, NO ADDITIONAL FUEL PUMPS OR NO CHANGES TO THE SITE'S CIRCULATION. THE ONLY IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE THAT BEING PROPOSED AS A PART OF THIS S P WOULD BE SCREENING OF ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT FROM PUBLIC STREET VIEWS. THIS WAS INITIALLY RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, AND THE APPLICANT AGREED TO DO THAT IN CASE IF THIS REQUEST GETS APPROVED. THE APPLICANT REQUESTED THE SUP WITH THE FOR A PERIOD OF 20. WITH A 20 YEAR TIME PERIOD, THE TIME PERIOD GUIDE RECOMMENDS 8 TO 15 YEARS FOR PARTIAL REDEVELOPMENT EXPANSION, OR UPDATE TO UPDATES TO AN EXISTING SITE. AS DISCUSSED EARLIER, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY AS URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS, EMPHASIZING HIGHER DENSITY DEVELOPMENT, MIXED USE OPPORTUNITIES. ADDITIONALLY, THE PROPERTY IS WITHIN A JUPITER WALNUT TARGETED INVESTMENT AREA OF JUPITER TRANSIT ORIENTED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, WHICH WAS ADOPTED IN THE YEAR 2013. THE AREA PLAN IDENTIFIES THIS LOCATION AS A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL CENTER AND ENCOURAGES BUILDING RENOVATIONS, STRATEGIC COMMERCIAL INFILL AND A DIVERSE MIX OF RETAIL AND SERVICE, SERVICE ORIENTED USES, IMPROVE STREETSCAPES AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS. SPECIFICALLY FOR THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF WALNUT STREET AND WALNUT AND JUPITER ROAD, THE PLAN IDENTIFIES OPPORTUNITIES TO ENHANCE THE CREEK ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND INTRODUCE NEW RETAIL AND RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED AMENITIES ALONG WALNUT STREET. THE CURRENT PROPOSAL WOULD MAINTAIN THE EXISTING AUTOMOBILE ORIENTED USE WITHOUT BUILDING RENOVATIONS, COMMERCIAL INFILL OR IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS. AND THE STAFF STAFF ALSO EVALUATED THE REQUEST AGAINST THE STRATEGIC PLAN. GARLAND ON THE RISE ALTHOUGH THE PROPERTY IS OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED ECONOMIC FOCUS AREA, THE STRATEGIC PLAN BROADLY ENCOURAGES FOR REINVESTMENT IN COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, IMPROVE DEVELOPMENT QUALITY, GREATER ECONOMIC PRODUCTIVITY PER ACRE FOR THE THE EXISTING FUEL PUMPS. RETAIL USE PRIMARILY ACCOMMODATES AUTOMOBILE TRAFFIC AND DOES NOT SUPPORT THESE BROADER OBJECTIVES. FOR THESE REASONS, STAFF FINDS THAT THE REQUEST DOES NOT ADVANCE THE LONG TERM
[00:10:03]
REDEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, NOR THE FOREST JUPITER TRANSIT ORIENTED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. THEREFORE, STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL OF BOTH THE SUB AND THE ASSOCIATED CONCEPT PLAN. A TOTAL OF 222 NOTICES HAVE BEEN MAILED OUT AND WE RECEIVED NONE INTEREST.WITH THIS, I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? COMMISSIONER ABEL, DO WE KNOW WHY CITY COUNCIL DID A ONE YEAR'S U. P WHENEVER THIS WAS ORIGINALLY PUT FORTH? BECAUSE I KNOW THE CANOPY HAD FALLEN AND THAT WAS OBVIOUSLY COUNCIL'S PREROGATIVE. BUT THE DISCUSSIONS REVOLVED AROUND THE LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CANOPY RESTORATION, WHICH HAVE BEEN DONE. BUT SOME OF THE LANDSCAPING HAVE DECLINED FROM THE CONDITION THAT WE REQUIRED TO BE. AND THEN THE CANOPY ALSO MAY NOT FULLY IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE IT WAS FULLY RESTORED, BUT AGAIN, THE APPLICANT CAN SPEAK TO THAT. BUT THAT WAS THE DISCUSSION. I DON'T WANT TO SAY THAT WAS THE BASIS OF COUNCIL'S RECOMMENDATION. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I'VE GOT ONE. I WENT OUT THERE AND THERE ARE SOME SCREENING OF THE MECHANICAL ALONG THE JUPITER SIDE AND ALONG THE WALNUT SIDE. I ASSUME YOU WANT THEM TO ADD SCREENING ALONG THE BACK, WHICH IS STILL VISIBLE AS YOU'RE DRIVING DOWN WALNUT. YES. SO AS A PART OF THIS REQUEST, THE APPLICANT WOULD BE SCREENING THE ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT FROM ALL THE SIDES. AND I DID GO OUT THERE. AND IF THE INTENT OF COUNCIL WAS FOR I WON'T I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK TO WHAT COUNCIL WANTED, BUT I DON'T THINK THAT'S LANDSCAPING THAT THEY DISSIPATED. THEIR SHRUBS ARE ABOUT 12IN TALL AND HALF OF THEM ARE DEAD OR DYING. SO I DON'T EVEN KNOW IF THERE'S AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO KEEP THEM ALIVE. GRANT, WE HAD A BAD SUMMER FOR ANY KIND OF LANDSCAPING, BUT THERE MAY BE SOME OPTIONS THERE. ALL RIGHTY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. I'VE GOT THE I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT HERE, KHALID RIZWAN RIZWAN. YEAH. IF YOU WANT TO COME ON DOWN. YEAH. AND NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. MY NAME IS KHALID RIZWAN AND I'M TALKING FOR THE STATION AT 3420 WEST WALNUT STREET, GARLAND, TEXAS, 75042. OKAY. ANYTHING YOU WANTED TO ADD OR. WELL, WHAT I YES, THERE WAS A SCENARIO WHERE THE CANOPY WAS NOT WAS NOT CORRECT AND IT ACTUALLY, BECAUSE OF THE HIGH WIND AND SOMETHING ELSE, IT JUST FELL ON THE ONE SIDE. AND THEN I ALSO DIDN'T KNOW. AND WHEN I KNEW THAT WE OBVIOUSLY FIXED IT, WE FIXED IT THE WAY IT SHOULD BE. AND ACCORDING TO THE PLANS, AND ALSO IT WAS GIVEN TO THE CITY WITH THEIR DEPARTMENT, CORRECT DEPARTMENT, WHOEVER HANDLES THOSE THINGS AND THEY ADDRESS THE ISSUE. AND THE CANOPY WAS FIXED. AND RIGHT NOW THE WAIT IS FIXED. EVEN IT WAS THE LEVEL AND THE SUPPORT IS LOT BETTER THAN IT WAS BEFORE, BECAUSE THAT THING, WE DO NOT WANT TO DO IT AGAIN OR WANT TO SEE IT AGAIN. AND AS FAR AS THE YOUR LANDSCAPING GOES, I DID PUT ALL THE SHRUBS, BUT SOME OF THEM ARE LOOKS LIKE A LITTLE BIT DYING, THAT'S FOR SURE. IT PROBABLY WOULD NEED WATERING. I TALKED TO THEM WHEN I COME AND THEY SAID NO, THEY WATER IT, BUT LOOKS LIKE IT DEFINITELY NEEDS SOME WATERING AND DEFINITELY I'LL BE LOOKING INTO IT. AND I WAS OUT OF TOWN FOR A WHILE, SO I JUST GOT BACK COUPLE OF DAYS AGO. SO AND SO I TALKED TO A COUPLE OF TIMES. AND AS FAR AS THE SCREENING GOES, THAT WILL NOT A PROBLEM.
THAT'S ALSO I ALSO WANTED THAT TO HAPPEN. SO THAT'S NOT AN ISSUE AT ALL. AND AS FAR AS THE BUSINESS GOES, IT'S THERE FOR A WHILE WE NEVER REALLY HAD ANY ISSUE, NOR EVEN WE ARE ANTICIPATING ANY ISSUES. AND MOST OF THE CUSTOMERS ARE HAPPY. AND ACTUALLY WE ARE NOT HAVING THAT MUCH OF A TROUBLE OF ANY DIRECTION. AND AS FAR AS MAINTAINING THE PLACE I DO, AND AS FAR AS THE TANK GOES, OR THE FUEL PUMP GOES, WHICH IS A LITTLE BIT CAN BE A CONCERN BECAUSE IT'S FOR A WHILE. BUT WE DID A STAGE ONE AND STAGE TWO TEST LAST YEAR AND EVERYTHING, EVERYTHING IS OKAY ON THAT ONE. SO WE HAVE THAT REPORT SHOULD IT NECESSARY, I
[00:15:02]
CAN SUPPORT AND PROVIDE THAT. THAT'S NOT AN ISSUE. AND AS FAR AS THE SCREENING GOES, OBVIOUSLY I'M GOING TO TAKE CARE OF IT. AND THE LANDSCAPING, LANDSCAPING I SEE, BUT I'M NOT SURE WHETHER IN MY HOUSE. IT'S ALSO THE GRASS IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT BECAUSE THIS IS THE WINTER IS COMING. BUT THEN AGAIN, PUTTING SOME FERTILIZER OVER THE WATER IS NOT AN ISSUE.THOSE THINGS DEFINITELY. I'LL TAKE CARE OF IT. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING DOWN. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE YOU LISTENING TO ME.
THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE NO OTHER SPEAKER CARDS IN THIS CASE. ANYBODY ELSE WISH TO ADDRESS THIS CASE? SEEING NONE. COMMISSIONERS SESSION. COMMISSIONER ABEL, I, I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THIS A LITTLE FURTHER, BECAUSE IT'S MY DISTRICT AND I DRIVE PAST THIS THREE, FOUR TIMES A DAY. I REALLY FEEL LIKE THERE COULD HAVE BEEN MORE DONE BASED ON OUR OUR PAST CONVERSATIONS UP HERE. AND IT LOOKS LIKE EVERYTHING IS JUST KIND OF GETTING DONE TO THE BARE MINIMUM. AND LOOKING AT THE 2050 AND BEYOND, I REALLY THINK THAT CORNER NEEDS MORE LOVE THAN IT'S GETTING. I JUST, I KIND OF FEEL LIKE IT'S FALLING BY THE WAYSIDE AND FURTHERING THIS WOULD JUST KEEP IT GOING. THOSE ARE MY THOUGHTS. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER JENKINS. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER. THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN. COMMISSIONER, I MIRROR YOUR SENTIMENT. I CAME IN THIS EVENING INCLINED BASED ON STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION, TO FOLLOW WHAT STAFF HAD KIND OF PUT FORTH FORTH FROM US. I LISTENING TO THE HISTORY AS PRESENTED BY STAFF. I THOUGHT IT WAS KIND OF INTERESTING THAT, YOU KNOW, THEY GRANTED A ONE YEAR CP IT SEEMS LIKE THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO RECONSIDER, AND THERE MIGHT HAVE BEEN SOME INTENTIONALITY BEHIND THAT. SO THAT BEING SAID, AGAIN, I WAS IN SUPPORT OF STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION FOR THIS APPLICATION. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? COMMISSIONER LUCIDO? THERE WE GO. THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN. I WAS ALSO INCLINED, I THINK, SIMILARLY, READING THIS, THINKING ABOUT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND CERTAINLY WITH ANOTHER AUTO RELATED BUSINESS IN THAT AREA, WHEN THE LONG RANGE PLAN IS FOR A DIFFERENT MIX OF RETAIL AND RESTAURANT AND IT BEING A PROMINENT CORNER, I, I DO AGREE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? I'VE GOT A LITTLE BIT OF INPUT. FIRST, TO YOUR POINT IN TERMS OF LANDSCAPING. YEAH. I DON'T THINK IT MEETS WHAT ANYBODY INTENDED. AND I WOULD BE INCLINED MAYBE IN THIS CASE, IF WE APPROVE IT AND MAYBE IN FUTURE CASES CONCERNING FUEL PUMPS, IS TO USE THE STANDARD WE HAVE FOR PARKING LOTS, WHICH IS A CONTINUOUS SCREEN OF MINIMUM TWO FOOT TALL SHRUBS. WE DO THAT, YOU KNOW, TO BLOCK THE LIGHTS AND EVERYTHING, YOU KNOW, IN THIS CASE, 2 OR 3FT. AND IF WE DO EXTEND IT, I WOULD SUGGEST POSSIBLY TWO YEARS TO GIVE THEM A CHANCE TO ESTABLISH THAT IF WE SHUT THEM DOWN. I LOOKED AT THE OWNERSHIP PATTERN AND THIS BUILDING AND THE OTHER BUILDING NEXT TO IT ARE DIFFERENT OWNERS, AND IT'S HEMMED IN BY THE, EXCUSE M BY THE CREEK TO THE BACK, AND IT'S ACTUALLY A FLOODPLAIN BACK THERE. SO TO GET A RESTAURANT AND A PARKING INVOLVED, THEY PROBABLY HAVE TO DO A USER AGREEMENT WITH THE SHOPPING CENTER BACK BEHIND OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. I, I SEE DIFFICULTIES IN BRINGING IT UP TO WHAT WE WANT AT THIS POINT IN TIME. I, I'D BE INCLINED TO DO THAT WITH THE PROVISIONS THAT MAY WE JUST INCREASE THAT LANDSCAPING TO OUR STANDARDS FOR PARKING LOTS, WHERE YOU DON'T SEE ALL THE CARS AND EVERYTHING. SO THAT'S MY $0.02.
HERE. MOTION OR DISCUSSION. COMMISSIONER ABEL, I'M JUST GOING TO REQUEST TO SPEAK BECAUSE I, I FEEL LIKE IF THERE HAD BEEN MORE EFFORT A YEAR AND A HALF AGO, I WOULD BE MORE INCLINED TO AGREE WITH YOU. I MEAN, I THIS IS MY DISTRICT. IT NEEDS HELP. I MEAN, WE, WE, WE, WE DO WANT TO BE BETTER THAN. YEAH. AND IT UNFORTUNATELY, CHANGE IS HARD AND DIFFICULT AND IT'S GOING TO BE A BIG DECISION. BUT I THINK LOOKING AT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, LOOKING AT EVERYTHING THAT WE'RE DOING GOING FORWARD, IT HAS TO START SOMEWHERE. AND I.
[00:20:05]
I DON'T WANT A VACANT BUILDING, BUT I WANT THE RIGHT BUILDING THAT SOMEONE'S GOING TO CARE FOR. VERY GOOD. I'M GOING TO MAKE THAT MOTION THEN GO AHEAD. YOUR MIC IS STILL ALIVE. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO DECLINE AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LUCIDO. LET ME CORRECT ALREADY WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LUCIDO TO DECLINE THE APPLICATION. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? GO AHEAD AND VOTE.WE'RE IN A VOTING NOW. SORRY. IT PASSES 5 TO 1 WITH CHAIRMAN ROBERTSON. OPPOSITION. THANK
[b. Z 26-31 Radiant Kidz Academy (District 6)]
YOU. ALL RIGHT. NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF RADITZ KIDS ACADEMY REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PROVISION TO ALLOW DAYCARE, YOUTH LICENSED CHILD CARE CENTER USE AND A CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE DAYCARE.USE LICENSED CHILD CARE USE. THE SITE IS LOCATED AT 916 NORTH JUPITER ROAD. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS BRANT HARVEY. I'M A PLANNER ON STAFF. I AM PRESENTING TONIGHT ON PROJECT Z26-31. SO LIKE YOU JUST SAID, THIS APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A SPECIFIC USE PROVISION FOR A DAYCARE YOUTH LICENSED CHILD CARE CENTER USE ON A PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN SF SEVEN. JUST TO GIVE A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY ABOUT THIS SITE AND GET AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHY THIS REQUEST IS IN FRONT OF YOU TONIGHT. A CHILD CARE AND PRESCHOOL FACILITY HAVE BEEN OPERATING AT THIS ADDRESS SINCE 1983, AND SDP WAS FIRST GRANTED FOR THE USE IN SEPTEMBER 1983, WHICH ALLOWED OPERATION FOR TEN YEARS. A SECOND SUV FOR A CHILD CARE CENTER WAS APPROVED IN FEBRUARY 2004 FOR TEN YEARS, AND A THIRD SUV FOR CHILD CARE CENTER WAS APPROVED IN 2006 TO ALLOW THE USE FOR 20 YEARS, WHICH EXPIRED ON MAY 2ND OF THIS YEAR. SO THAT'S WHY YOU ARE SEEING A NEW REQUEST FOR THAT USE TODAY. SO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 4.98 ACRES. IT'S LOCATED AT 916 NORTH JUPITER ROAD AND IT IS ZONED FS7. THIS IS WITHIN A COUNCIL DISTRICT SIX AS WELL. SURROUNDING USES INCLUDE CHURCHES TO THE NORTH AND THE WEST. SINGLE FAMILY HOMES TO THE EAST WHICH ARE ALL ZONED S, F SEVEN AS WELL. AND TO THE SOUTH ARE A MIX OF COMMERCIAL USES THAT ARE ZONED COMMUNITY RETAIL. THE PROPERTIES DESIGNATED COMPACT NEIGHBORHOODS IN THE CITY'S FUTURE LAND USE PLAN, WHICH SUPPORTS LOW INTENSITY SERVICE USES THAT SERVE NEARBY RESIDENTIAL AREAS. HERE ARE A FEW SITE PHOTOS. TWO ON THE LEFT ARE FROM THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING. THIS IS FROM LARIAT LANE. YOU CAN SEE SOME LANDSCAPE FOUNDATION PLANTINGS AND A FEW MATURE TREES THERE.
AT THE FRONT. ON THE RIGHT SIDE IS THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE BUILDING FROM THE PARKING LOT, AND THEN ALSO THE PLAYGROUND AT THE REAR OF THE BUILDING, WHICH IS REQUIRED FOR THE USE. ALL RIGHT, HERE IS THE CONCEPT PLAN. THE REQUEST IS FOR WHAT'S LABELED DAYCARE. SEE DAYCARE BUILDING C, IT'S SHOWN IN RED. THAT BUILDING IS 16,160FTā S IN SIZE. THIS ENTIRE SITE, THOUGH, IS ALSO USED BY A CHURCH, AND THAT CHURCH BUILDING IS 62,713FTā S. SO EXISTING BUILDINGS, EXISTING PARKING, EXISTING SITE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A TIME PERIOD OF 20 YEARS. STAFF RECOMMENDS A TIME PERIOD OF EIGHT YEARS WITH THE CONDITIONS THAT A CONTINUOUS ROW OF EVERGREEN SHRUBS BE ADDED TO BOBBY LANE, A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE BE INSTALLED AND THE PARKING LOT BE RESTRIPED, AND I WANTED TO INCLUDE SOME S SITE PHOTOS TO HELP SUPPORT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS. THIS IS A PARKING. THE PARKING LOT FACING WEST TOWARDS LARIAT JUST FOR.
STAFF. THOUGHT IT WOULD BE IMPORTANT THAT THE PARKING LOT BE RESTRIPED TO ENHANCE ENHANCE SAFETY. THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSING THAT RATHER THAN HAVING A PICK UP DROP OFF AREA, PARENTS WOULD BE PARKING AND WALKING THEIR CHILDREN IN. SO JUST ENSURING THAT THE SITE IS A LITTLE MORE SAFE WITH STRIPING, CROSSWALKS, THINGS LIKE THAT. HERE IS A PICTURE OF THE DUMPSTER. IT'S FULLY VISIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC STREET, SO JUST ASKING THAT ENCLOSURE BE ADDED TO HELP SCREEN THIS. AND THEN HERE'S JUST A GOOGLE STREET VIEW. THIS IS BOBBY LANE.
THE CHURCH PROPERTY IS ON THE LEFT SIDE, BUT WE ARE PROPOSING THAT SOME EVERGREEN SHRUBS BE ADDED ALONG THIS AREA BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND THE PROPERTY, JUST TO HELP SCREEN THE PARKING
[00:25:03]
LOT AND ENHANCE THE SITE. SO IN SUMMARY, THE REQUEST SUPPORTS THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VISION FOR COMPACT NEIGHBORHOODS AND PROMOTES LIVABILITY. STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST WITH THE PROPOSED CONDITIONS, AND WE SEND OUT 145 LETTERS AND WE RECEIVED ONE IN OPPOSITION. AND THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF. COMMISSIONER JENKINS. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. GOOD EVENING, MA'AM.THREE QUESTIONS FOR YOU. POTENTIALLY. LET'S START WITH THE FIRST TWO. ARE THERE ANY CODE COMPLAINTS FROM THIS LOCATION? NOT THAT I'M AWARE OF, NO. THEY'VE COME IN FOR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE USE. AND SO THAT'S WHY THEY'RE GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS. I WASN'T AWARE OF ANY OUTSTANDING CODE VIOLATIONS. THEY'RE COMING IN FOR CO BECAUSE THERE WAS NO CO JUST BECAUSE THEY I GUESS THERE WASN'T A CO. I'M NOT SURE THE BACKGROUND OF HOW THEY CAME IN, BUT THEY DO REQUIRE AN SUP BECAUSE THEY'RE SUP EXPIRED IN MAY. SO THAT'S HOW THEY ENDED UP HERE. WE DID CONTACT CODE COMPLIANCE AND WE'LL BE HEARING SOME BACKGROUND STUFF IF THERE'S ANYTHING GOING ON. BUT WE ARE CURRENTLY NOT AWARE OF SOMETHING GOING ON ONLY ASKING THE CODE QUESTION. BECAUSE IF WE'RE MAKING A SUGGESTION RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE STRIPING, WHICH I BELIEIEVE IS A CODE ISSUE, THE POTHOLES WOULD ALSO NEED TO BE DONE. I DIDN'T WANT THE POTHOLES FILLED IN BEFORE THE STRIPING, BECAUSE IT WOULD JUST NOT BE TERRIBLY, YOU KNOW, ON THE UP AND UP. OKAY, THAT WAS THE FIRST QUESTION.
SECOND QUESTION. WE'VE DISCOVERED THAT THE CEO WAS IN QUESTION. THIRD IS THE SUP RELATED SPECIFICALLY TO THE ENTIRETY OF THE PROPERTY OR TO THE BUILDING IN WHICH THEY ARE OPERATING AS UPS FOR THE WHOLE SITE. BUT THE CHILD CARE FACILITY WOULD JUST BE OPERATING IN BUILDING C. SO IT'S IT'S AN AMENDMENT TO THE SF SEVEN DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY ITSELF. AMENDMENTS NOT CORRECTLY. IT'S AN SUP. YEAH. IT'S JUST OVERLAYING THAT BASE ZONING DISTRICT, BUT IT WOULD BE FOR THE ENTIRE 4.9 ACRE PROPERTY. SO THEY COULD MOVE IF IN THE EVENT OF SOME SORT OF EMERGENCY, GOD FORBID, THEY COULD MOVE THEIR OPERATION INTO THE INTERIOR OF THE CHURCH IF THEY NEEDED TO. TECHNICALLY, YES, BUT THE CONCEPT PLAN DOES SHOW THEM TO BE IN BUILDING C, AND USUALLY THAT'S HOW WE DETERMINE WHERE THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE. OF COURSE, IT'S A CONCEPT PLAN. SO DEPENDING ON WHY AND WHAT'S CAUSING THE THEM TO BE MOVING, WE CAN RECONSIDER. BUT GENERALLY IT WILL BE CONTAINED IN THIS BUILDING C, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THE CONCEPT PLAN SHOWS. AND THE CONCEPT PLAN IS PART OF THE ORDINANCE.
OKAY, OKAY. JUST LIKE IT'S FOR SWEETS. JUST THINK OF IF THERE'S AN SUP IN A SUITE IN A BUILDING, IT'S THERE CONTAINED WITHIN THAT SUITE ONLY. OKAY, OKAY. THANK YOU. I THINK THAT'S IT. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. IF THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD. AND NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. MATT DAVIS, I'M THE OWNER OF THIS DAYCARE, 916 NORTH JUPITER ROAD, GARLAND.
NICE TO MEET YOU GUYS. ALL. JUST SOME BACKGROUND ON WHAT'S GOING ON IS MY WIFE'S PARENTS USED TO OWN THIS DAYCARE. I WE BOUGHT THIS DAYCARE FOUR MONTHS AGO. HER PARENTS OWNED IT FOR 15, 20 YEARS. IT WAS HIGHLY SUCCESSFUL. HAD LIKE 170 KIDS HERE. THE REASON WHY THIS IS KIND OF HAPPENING IS BECAUSE THEY WERE LICENSED FOR SOME REASON FOR A CHARTER SCHOOL, AND THEY'VE BEEN A DAYCARE FOR 15 PLUS YEARS. SO THAT'S WHY THIS HAS BEEN AN ISSUE, BECAUSE WE WENT TO GET OUR CEO. THEY TOLD US THIS SITE IS LICENSED AS A CHARTER SCHOOL. AND IN ORDER TO GET A CEO FOR DAYCARE, WE WOULD HAVE TO DO THE SUP PROCESS. SO I DON'T KNOW WHY IT WAS LIKE THAT FOR CHARTER SCHOOL WHEN IT'S BEEN A DAYCARE FOR 15 PLUS YEARS. YOU KNOW, WE'VE WE'VE WORKED HARD THESE LAST FOUR MONTHS, COMPLIED WITH EVERY, YOU KNOW, CITY REGULATION. YOU KNOW, WE'VE, WE'VE BEEN ESTABLISHED WITH THE STATE. YOU KNOW, THEY'VE GIVEN US OUR PERMIT. THEY HAVE US LICENSE FOR, I THINK, 260 KIDS. NOW WE'RE JUST ASKING FOR GRACE IN THIS. YOU KNOW, WE'RE GOING TO MAKE SOME CHANGES. WE WANT TO MAKE THIS DAYCARE VERY NICE IN THIS AREA BECAUSE THIS AREA DESPERATELY NEEDS A NICE CHRISTIAN DAYCARE. IT'S A LOWER INCOME AREA. SO WE WANT TO OFFER, YOU KNOW, LUXURY CARE FOR THE PRICE FOR AN AFFORDABLE
[00:30:06]
PRICE. SO WE ARE, YOU KNOW, UP FOR ALL THE RECOMMENDATIONS TO, YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, FIX THE LANDSCAPE TO MAKE IT LOOK NICER. YOU KNOW, WE'VE, WE'VE REPAINTED THE WHOLE BUILDING OUTSIDE. IT LOOKS A LOT NICER ALREADY SINCE WE REPAINTED IT, WE REPAINTED INSIDE FULLY, YOU KNOW, REDID THE FURNITURE. WE'RE UNDERSTANDING THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S SOME WORK THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE TO THIS SITE WITH LANDSCAPING, YOU KNOW, PUTTING, YOU KNOW, A FENCE FOR THE DUMPSTER, YOU KNOW, DOING STRIPING AND STUFF LIKE THAT. BUT WE WOULD JUST APPRECIATE SOME GRACE IN THIS. WE MOVED HERE FROM SOUTH CAROLINA TO TAKE THIS OVER. AND IT'S BEEN A LITTLE STRESSFUL AS FIRST TIME BUSINESS OWNERS. BUT, YOU KNOW, GOD PUT THIS ON OUR HEARTS TO REALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN THIS AREA. SO YEAH, WE WOULD JUST APPRECIATE YOUR GRACE AND JUST OFFERING US, YOU KNOW, SUP SO WE CAN, YOU KNOW, START PROVIDING, YOU KNOW, A GOOD OUTLET FOR THESE KIDS IN THESE AREAS. AND, YOU KNOW, WE'RE, WE'RE WILLING TO DO ALL THE WORK TO MAKE IT, YOU KNOW, LOOK, LOOK A LOT NICER. SO WE APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU.ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? I COMMISSIONER ABLE GO, GO. I JUST WIPED YOU OUT.
SORRY. I'M USED TO IT. HAVING BEEN INVOLVED WITH PTAS AT ALL THE SCHOOLS AROUND JACKSON.
BOBBY. EVEN CLOSER TO MY HOUSE. I MEAN, I'VE KNOWN YOUR PARENTS THROUGH THE YEARS. IS THE CHURCH INVOLVED IN THE PARKING LOT AT ALL? IS THAT IS THAT CONSIDERED YOUR SIDE? YES. SO OUR SIDE IS MAINLY THE FRONT. IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE FRONT WHERE IT SAYS, I THINK IT SAYS LIKE UBC ACADEMY RIGHT THERE, THAT'S NORMALLY WHERE THE PARENTS PICK UP AND DROP OFF.
THERE'S A LITTLE CURBSIDE AREA THAT THEY PARK THEIR CAR THERE AND THEN TAKE THE KIDS OUT.
THERE'S A LOT OF THERE'S ALSO, YOU KNOW, A NUMBER OF STRIPED PARKING SPOTS RIGHT THERE, RIGHT? THE AREAS WITH THE BIGGER POTHOLES ARE KIND OF MORE THE CHURCH SIDE AREA, BUT IT, IT FALLS UNDER THE SITE PLAN, UNFORTUNATELY. RIGHT. SO YEAH, I MEAN, THE CHURCH STILL TECHNICALLY OWNS THE BUILDING. WE'RE JUST, YOU KNOW, LEASING IT. YOU'RE A LEASER. YEAH, WE'RE JUST, WE OWN THE BUSINESS, BUT THEY OWN THE BUILDING. WE'RE PAYING THEM RENT. SO I WOULD, I SAY THIS VERY LOOSELY, BUT ANYTHING THAT WE RECOMMEND, DON'T TAKE IT AS A. YEAH, THIS IS JUST YOU. OKAY. WE'RE WE'RE JUST TRYING TO SET A STANDARD AND IT'S I LIKE IT. I'VE BEEN HERE 28 YEARS AND THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I CAN SIT HERE AND KIND OF SAY, YOU. AT OUR LAST MEETING, WE WERE TOLD TO UP THE STANDARDS. YES, WE WE WE'RE LOOKING AT EVERYTHING THROUGHGHA FINER MICROSCOPE. SIR. I, I WORK AT A BUILDING IN GARLAND AND WE HAD TO HAVE THE DUMPSTER SURROUNDS. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT EVERY BUSINESS IS GOING TO. IF IT COMES BEFORE US, IT'S GOING TO GET. THAT'S NOT PERSONAL. IT'S JUST THE WAY IT IS. AND WE'RE. WE'RE WANTING TO BETTER THE CITY TO BRING YOU A HIGHER CLIENTELE TO SERVE. AND WE WANT THAT TO, YOU KNOW, WE WANT THE LANDSCAPING AND THE PARKING LOT LOOKING NICE BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THAT GENERATES MORE, YOU KNOW, POSITIVE, YOU KNOW, CUSTOMERS, YOU KNOW, WHEN THEY SEE A NICE LANDSCAPED AREA, YOU KNOW, FRESHLY STRIPED, YOU KNOW, PARKING SPOTS, THE PAINTING HAS BEEN NOTICED. IT LOOKS GOOD. WHAT YOU'VE DONE SO FAR. YES, SIR. AND THAT AREA, YOU KNOW, NEEDS IT. AND WE'VE SPENT, YOU KNOW, PROBABLY $80,000, YOU KNOW, INTO THE BUILDING ALREADY TO REPAINT IT FOR US. PAINT, YOU KNOW, FOR US PAINT ON THE OUTSIDE FOR US, PAINT ON THE INSIDE. SO, YOU KNOW, WE WANT TO MAKE THIS, YOU KNOW, LIKE I SAID, WE WANT TO, WE WANT TO OFFER SOMETHING GOOD FOR THIS AREA THAT DESPERATELY NEEDS IT WITH THE FAITH BASED DAYCARE.
AND WANT, WE WANT IT TO LOOK LIKE LUXURY, BUT AFFORDABLE CARE FOR THIS AREA THAT NEEDS IT. THANK YOU SIR. COMMISSIONER DUCKWORTH AND THEN COMMISSIONER JENKINS, TO KIND OF PIGGYBACK ON THAT, THE CHURCH OWNS THE PROPERTY. YES, SIR. DO YOU HAVE THEIR COOPERATION OR INTEREST IN WORKING TO BRING THESE THINGS UP THAT ARE BEING MENTIONED? YES, SIR. YEP. THE CHURCH HAS I THINK IT'S LIKE A MAINTENANCE PERSON THAT'S KIND OF IN CHARGE OF THIS STUFF. SO WE BROUGHT IT TO THEIR ATTENTION. IT'S KIND OF A COLLABORATION BECAUSE LIKE I SAID, MY WIFE'S FATHER IS THE LEAD PASTOR OF THIS CHURCH. SO WE'VE KIND OF BEEN WORKING HAND IN HAND TOGETHER THROUGHOUT THIS PROCESS. SO THEY'RE WILLING TO, TO MAKE THOSE, THOSE CHANGES AND KIND OF, YOU KNOW, MAKE IT LOOK NICER. I THINK IT'S AN OLDER SITE, SO IT PROBABLY HASN'T HAD A LOT OF WORK DONE RECENTLY BECAUSE I THINK IT'S THE CHURCH HAS BEEN
[00:35:01]
THERE FOR A LONG TIME. SO YEAH. OKAY. I'M JUST GOING TO TAKE SOME PARTNERSHIP WITH THE CHURCH TO BRING THINGS UP. YES, SIR. AND WHEN WE GET GET TO THE POINT OF IF THIS IS APPROVED, I THINK WE TALKED ABOUT WHILE AGO, MAYBE SETTING SOME STANDARDS FOR SIZE OF SHRUBS OR BUSHES.CAN WE DO THAT? THERE'S ACTUALLY IT'LL BE PART OF THE GDC. OKAY. YEAH. SO THEY HAVE SIZES. SORRY. YEAH. WE HAVE APPROVED PLANT LIST. OKAY. AND THOSE ARE. YEAH. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER JENKINS. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. GOOD EVENING SIR. THANK YOU FOR THE APPLICATION AND FOR YOUR INTEREST AND DESIRE IN SERVING THE COMMUNITY. MY QUESTION IS AN ATTEMPT TO BE CONCILIATORY. YOU ALL ARE SEEKING 20 YEARS AS AN SCP GUIDELINE. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING EIGHT. I KNOW WE'RE TALKING DAYCARE, SO FORGIVE THE CRUDE AND DARK HUMOR, BUT I'M TRYING TO SPLIT THE BABY. WOULD YOU ALL BE COMFORTABLE WITH A 12 YEAR OR 15 YEAR SCP RECOMMENDATION BASED ON KIND OF THE MIDDLE GROUND BETWEEN WHAT STAFF IS PRESENTING AND WHAT YOU ALL WANT? YEAH, YEAH, I THINK WE WOULD BE OKAY WITH ANYTHING YOU GUYS SUGGEST AT THIS POINT. WE'RE JUST WE'RE LOOKING TO, YOU KNOW, MAKE AN IMPACT. AND THIS IS KIND OF THE LAST LITTLE HURDLE THAT WE HAVE TO GET OVER BEFORE WE CAN REALLY, YOU KNOW, START STEPPING OUT INTO THE COMMUNITY AND MAKING AN IMPACT. SO WE'RE GRACIOUS. YOU KNOW, MY WIFE'S FROM HERE. THIS IS MY FIRST TIME BEING IN TEXAS. SO BUT YEAH, WHATEVER YOU GUYS SUGGEST WE'RE ON BOARD WITH. SO THANK YOU. NOW YOU'RE HERE. YOU CAN'T EVER LEAVE. YEAH. I ALWAYS TOLD MY WIFE IF I MOVED ANYWHERE, IT'D BE TEXAS. SO AWESOME. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THANK YOU. WELCOME TO TEXAS. I THINK I'LL FIRST ASK STAFF A QUESTION. THE REPORT MENTIONED 100 STUDENTS. HE'S TALKING 170 WITH LICENSING UP TO 280. DOES THAT HAVE ANY BEARING ON YOUR RECOMMENDATION? I THINK HE MENTIONED IN THE PAST IT WAS 170. CORRECT. BUT IN THE PAST, I THINK THEY'VE HAD UP TO 170 KIDS THERE. I THINK IT'S LICENSED FOR 255 RIGHT NOW. I WANT TO SAY IT. IT IS. BUT OUR YOU DO UNDERSTAND THE SUP REQUEST IS LIMITING IT TO 100 BASED ON THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THAT Y'ALL DID.
OKAY. I WASN'T AWARE OF THAT. OH, YOU WERE OKAY. YEAH, IT'S THE REASON I BROUGHT IT UP. I DIDN'T KNOW IF IT'D BE PART OF IT. THERE'S A THRESHOLD TO REQUIRE OR TO PROVIDE THAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. IT'S A TRAFFIC STUDY, YES. AND SO A CIRCULATION PLAN WAS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT THAT SHOWED MAX 100 STUDENTS. AND THAT JUST SHOWS THAT THERE'S NO ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE SITE FOR TRAFFIC GENERATED BY THE USE. SO ANY STUDENT COUNT BEYOND 100, A NEW REQUEST WOULD BE REQUIRED AND THAT T WOULD BE REQUIRED AS WELL. OKAY. THANK YOU. SO THERE WOULD BE STILL A AN OPPORTUNITY AND A ROAD TO LICENSE MORE KIDS FOR THEM. WELL ON, ON THIS, WOULD YOU HAVE TO COME BACK AGAIN IF YOU WANT TO, IF THEY'RE WANTING TO GO BEYOND 100, THEN YES, BECAUSE THE CIRCULATION PLAN IS ATTACHED AS A CONDITION, BECAUSE THE CIRCULATION PLAN COULD ONLY PROVE THAT 100 STUDENTS COULD. COULD REALLY OPERATE PROPERLY ON THIS SITE. INTERESTING. YEAH. BEING MORE INCLINED MAYBE TO CHANGE THAT NUMBER IN A MOTION.
BUT OKAY, ANOTHER QUESTION I HAVE IS YOU TALKED TO ME A LITTLE BIT THE EXTENT OF THE PARKING LOT SCREENING. HOW? BECAUSE WE'VE GOT A CHURCH WHICH IS PRIMARILY RESPONSIBLE FOR SCREENING AND THEN THEY'RE RESPONSIBLE. HOW MUCH SCREENING WOULD THEY BE DOING? WOULD THAT BE ALONG LAWLER OR ALL ALONG, OR JUST PART OF LAWLER? WOULD IT BE THE LARIAT? WOULD IT BE THE TWO FOOT CONTINUOUS SCREENING THAT'S REQUIRED FOR PARKING LOTS, OR WHAT WOULD IT BE THE CONCEPT PLAN, IF YOU DON'T MIND? KIND OF WHAT I MAY HAVE MISSED THAT YES, THE CONDITIONS ARE FOR THIS IS ALONG BOBBY LANE. SO HERE'S OH, JUST ALONG BOBBY SITE PLAN.
BOBBY LANE IS ON THE LEFT SIDE. AND THIS IS BASICALLY THIS IS NORTH ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE. WELL, AGAIN, WOULD THAT BE THE CONTINUOUS TWO FOOT TALL. YES. IT'S CONTINUOUS ROW OF EVERGREEN SHRUBS IS WHAT THE CONDITIONS ARE FOR. AND IT WOULD BE MINIMUM 24IN I BELIEVE.
SO THE GDC REQUIRES. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. AND THEN MY OTHER CONCERN, LIKE COMMISSIONER JENKINS AND ABEL, IS THE PARKING LOT. AND AGAIN, THAT'S MORE OF A CHURCH ISSUE RIGHT NOW. SO I THINK STAFF IS GOING TO BE LOOKING INTO CODE COMPLIANCE OF THE PARKING LOT AREN'T WE WILL GET SOME SOME INFORMATION FROM THEM, BUT IF PLAN COMMISSION WOULD LIKE TO TIE SOMETHING TO YOUR
[00:40:06]
RECOMMENDATION WHERE THE PARKING LOT WOULD NEED TO BE COME UP TO STANDARD OR CODE REQUIRED, SOMETHING LIKE CODE. I MEAN, GDC STANDARD, YOU MAY. I MEAN, WE'LL HAVE LEGAL REVIEW IT AND MAKE SURE IT'S IT'S ACCEPTABLE. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH. BECAUSE I DROVE THROUGH THERE AND, AND THEN I WENT TO GET MY CAR LINED. AND IF YOU'RE TALKING SAFETY KIDS AND MORE LIKELY ADULTS COULD TRIP AND FALL IN THOSE POTHOLES AND STUFF. SO AND AGAIN, THIS IS PART CHURCH AND PART YOU. SO THOSE ARE SOME CONCERNS I HAVE. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE ON THAT? AND COMMISSIONER ABEL AND JENKINS HAVE SOME REBUTTAL. CAN CAN WE SEE THAT CONCEPT PLAN AGAIN? I HAVE A REAL QUESTION WITH LOOKING AT THIS. SO WE'RE TALKING SCREENING ALONG BOBBY LANE. CORRECT. THE DAYCARE OPERATES ON THE COMPLETE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THIS THROUGH ME. AND I WILL SAY WE WE ASKED. SO FOR THESE REQUESTS, TY GO THROUGH THE ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AS WELL. THERE ARE EASEMENTS, AND THE RIGHT OF WAY ABUTS THE SIDEWALK ALONG JUPITER AND LARIAT. OR WE WOULD HAVE PROPOSED SOME LANDSCAPING THERE, BUT ENGINEERING DID NOT WANT LANDSCAPING. I UNDERSTAND, AND I KNOW EASEMENTS VERY WELL. I JUST I'M LOOKING AT THIS NOW. I'M HAVING A HARD TIME WRAPPING MY MIND AROUND A DAYCARE, HAVING TO PUT SCREENING ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. I, I KNOW WHAT WEWE'RE TRYING TO GET, BUT THIS IS ON THEM, NOT THE CHURCH. AND I, I GUESS I'M JUST LOOKING FOR SOME HELP HERE BECAUSE WHY ARE WE SCREENING BOBBY LANE WHENEVER EVERYTHING'S GOING TO HAPPEN ā ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE LOT? YEAH. SINCE THE REQUEST IS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE, WE WERE LOOKING AT HOW TO ENHANCE THE ENTIRE SITE. AND SINCE LANDSCAPING COULDN'T BE ADDED ANYWHERE ELSE, WE THOUGHT, BOBBY LANE. SO DOES IT MAKE THE LAND USE MORE APPROPRIATE IN YOUR MIND BECAUSE THE SITE HAS BETTER LANDSCAPING? I'LL BE PERFECTLY HONEST WITH YOU. IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE TO ME. IF IT DOESN'T MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE TO YOU, THEN YEAH, IF I DROVE UP TO THAT AND THERE WAS NO EVERGREEN HEDGE THERE, AND I WAS TAKING MY KID TO A DAYCARE THAT THEY LOVED, I'D TAKE THEM AND DROP THEM OFF AND DRIVE RIGHT PAST IT. I DRIVING PAST IT TO GO TOORK IN THE MORNING.IT'S NOT GOING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE TO ME. I SEE WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO, BUT I JUST DON'T THINK THAT THAT'S VERY IMPACTFUL. I THINK THE MONEY COULD BE SPENT ELSEWHERE IN A BETTER, YOU KNOW, PUT TOWARDS THE PARKING LOT, PUT TOWARDS ANYTHING THAT IS C COMPLETEL UP TO YOU. THAT'S MY THOUGHTS. I'M JUST SHARING. OKAY. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER JENKINS. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. I SECOND COMMISSIONER ABEL'S QUESTIONS AND THOUGHTS. IF THERE IS A MIDDLE GROUND HERE, PERHAPS THE, YOU KNOW, THE TWO FOOT HIGH SHRUBS THAT ARE CONTINUOUS OR WILL WE GET AWAY WITH. AND INSTEAD WE GO WITH MAYBE SOME SOME SOMETHING ELSE. I DON'T KNOW. THE QUESTION I'VE GOT FOR STAFF, I THINK THE SUP RUNS WITH THE LAND, RIGHT. SO THE PROPERTY OWNER IS HAS TO SIGN ON TO THIS AT SOME POINT AS WELL. RIGHT. QUESTION MARK. SO THE APPLICATION WAS SIGNED BY THE OWNER. IT BASICALLY GIVES THEM, THEY'RE GIVING THEIR AUTHORIZATION FOR THEM TO GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS, BUT THEY DON'T HAVE TO SIGN OFF ON ANYTHING ELSE FOR THE SUP IN THE EVENT THAT THE COMMISSION MADE A RECOMMENDATION THAT INCLUDED SIGNIFICANT LANDSCAPING, THE APPLICANT SPECIFICALLY AND ONLY IS ON THE HOOK FOR ANYTHING WE RECOMMEND, NOT THE PROPERTY OWNER. THE OWNER SHOULD BE AWARE OF IT.
SINCE THEY SIGNED OFF ON THE REQUEST, THEY SHOULD BE INVOLVED. SO THAT WOULD BE BETWEEN THE APPLICANT AND THE PROPERTY OWNER. HOW THEY FIGURE IT OUT, THAT WOULD BE BETWEEN THEM. I MEAN, THIS IS THIS IS I MEAN, WE'RE KIND OF PLAYING HERE IN THE MUD BECAUSE BUT WHEN WE THE APPLICANTS APPLICANT'S FAMILY OWNS THE BUILDING AS WELL. SO IT'S NOT THERE. THE QUESTION IS REALLY A LEGAL QUESTION AND NOT NECESSARILY ONE THAT'S. SO WHEN WE SAY THE SUP RUNS WITH THE LAND, WE DON'T REALLY SAY IT FOR THESE MATTERS. IT'S MORE THE SUPS TIED WITH THE LAND. SO EVEN SO WE'RE JUST APPROVING THE USE. I MEAN, YOU'RE WELL AWARE THAT NOT THE USER. THAT'S WHAT WE MEAN WHEN WE MEAN WHEN WE SAY CP RUNS WITH THE LAND.
[00:45:02]
SO EVEN IF THIS PARTICULAR BUSINESS OWNER LEAVES THE SUP FOR THAT USE WOULD STILL BE TIED TO THE LAND. SO THAT'S WHERE IT COMES FROM. WE HAVE NEVER USED THAT ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE WHO'S ON THE HOOK TO IMPLEMENT THE CONDITIONS. SO SO A PURE HYPOTHETICAL, LET'S SAY LEGAL HAS TO ENFORCE A CODE VIOLATION, DECIDES TO LOOK AT THEIR S U, P AND UNDERLYING ZONING DISCOVERS THAT THERE'S A VIOLATION AND UNDERLYING ZONING AND HAS AUTHORITY TO ISSUE A NOTICE TO THEM BECAUSE THEY'RE IN VIOLATION OF THAT. THE OWNER AND THE TENANT WOULD GET THAT NOTICE, RIGHT? THE CONDITION ITSELF WOULD BE CORRECT. AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT IT THEY HAVE TO NOTIFY THE PROPERTY OWNER AS WELL. YEAH. TO CIRCLING BACK, I CIRCLE I SECOND COMMISSIONER ABEL'S THOUGHTS. I DO THINK IT'S A LITTLE ONEROUS TO REQUEST IMPROVED LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING FOR, FOR A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY PERTAIN TO THE APPLICANT. HOWEVER, I ALSO THINK THAT WE ARE TRYING TO ELEVATE EVERY APPLICATION THAT COMES BEFORE THE COMMISSION. SO I WOULD ENTERTAIN OR BE WILLING TO ENTERTAIN SOME THOUGHT TO SOME THINGS. I JUST DON'T HAVE AN IDEA WHAT? I DON'T KNOW HOW TO ASK THAT. THAT'S MY PROBLEM.YEAH. I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION FOR STAFF. WHEN YOU SAY RESTRIPE, THE PARKING IS THAT EVERY PARKING ON THE CHURCH OR JUST THE ONES THAT THEY WILL BE USING, IT'S FOR THE ENTIRE SITE.
THERE IS THIS EXISTING LANDSCAPED ISLAND. IT JUST HAS TWO CANOPY TREES IN IT. YOU COULD PROPOSE SOME TYPE OF SCREENING THERE. IT'S AT THE FRONT OF THEIR BUILDING. THAT'S REALLY THE ONLY LANDSCAPED AREA NEAR THERE THAT'S POSSIBLE. SAT NEXT TO THE HANDICAPPED PARKING.
THAT IS. THIS IS LIKE A KIND OF A JUST A DRIVE RIGHT HERE BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE LANDSCAPED AREA. OH I SEE, OKAY. THANK YOU. I THINK WE HAVE NO MORE QUESTIONS OF THE IT SEEMS LIKE STAFF IS AT THE PODIUM RIGHT NOW INSTEAD OF THE APPLICANT. I WILL ASK IF THERE'S I DON'T SEE ANYBODY. BUT IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THIS CASE? OKAY, COMMISSIONERS, WE'RE IN DISCUSSION MODE NOW. AND COMMISSIONER ABEL, LOOKS LIKE YOU WANT TO. WELL, JUST A SECOND. THERE WE GO. WE'LL DISCUSS FIRST. I LIKE IT. I LIKE 10 TO 12 YEARS. I LIKE THE RESTRIPING OF THE PARKING LOT.
I LIKE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PARKING LOT. I THINK THE SHRUBS ARE I. I JUST THINK THAT WITH FOOT TRAFFIC AND EVERYTHING ELSE GOING ON THERE, IT'S NOT GOING TO LAST. THAT'S THE ONLY PART I REALLY DON'T LIKE. I THINK IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING LANDSCAPING AND. 10 TO 12 YEARS WITH THE DUMPSTERS AROUND OR WHERE I'M LEANING ON THIS ONE. ALL RIGHTY. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? I JUST KNOCK YOU OUT. I TAKE IT THAT WAS YOU, COMMISSIONER JENKINS? YEAH, I GOT YOU. YES, SIR. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. I SUPPORT IT. I AGREE WITH THE STRIPING ON THE PARKING LOT. I AGREE WITH THE 12 YEAR RECOMMENDATION. IF IF THERE IS A SUGGESTION OR RECOMMENDATION TO DO A COUPLE CANOPY TREES IN THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE ISLAND OR EVEN ON THE CORNERS OF BOBBY LANE, I CAN SEE THAT TOO. AGAIN, I DON'T THAT'S NOT A HUGE HURDLE FOR ME.
I THINK THE APPLICATION IS A GREAT, PARTICULAR, GREAT PROPOSED USE FOR THE AREA THAT WOULD ADD BENEFIT. SO THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? I'D LIKE TO LOOK AT THE POSSIBILITY OF INCREASING OUR ALLOWED NUMBER OF STUDENTS TO 150 OR 170 SO THEY CAN I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE NUMBERS ARE FOR 100, ONLY SUCCESSFUL. SO THE 100 WAS DERIVED AS PART OF WITH THE THE CIRCULATION PLPLAN. SO THAT'S WHAT TRANSPORTATION WAS COMFORTABLE WITH WITH THE PROPOSED WITH THE CIRCULATION PLAN THAT THEY PROPOSED, ANY NUMBER BEYOND THAT WILL HAVE TO GO BACK. IF COMMISSION WANTS TO PROPOSE SOMETHING LIKE THAT, THAT WOULD NOT BE BACKED UP BY A SAFE CIRCULATION PLAN, AND WE WOULD DEFINITELY HAVE TO GET TRANSPORTATION INVOLVED. SO I WOULD ADVISE AGAINST THAT. CAN I SAY CAN I ASK A QUESTION OF HIM? COME ON BACK HERE, BECAUSE I LIKE THAT IDEA. I DO, BUT I WANT TO ASK, ARE YOU OKAY WITH 100 TO START? I WOULD PREFER MORE. MY ONLY THING IS THIS. THIS SITE HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR
[00:50:02]
A DAYCARE FOR, YOU KNOW, DECADE, TWO DECADES. YOU KNOW, THEY'VE HAD 180 KIDS HERE BEFORE. WHY ARE WE GOING BACKWARDS WHEN THEY'VE HAD MORE THAN THOSE KIDS? YOU KNOW, THE THE STATE HAS THIS LICENSE FOR 255 KIDS. THIS IS A 11,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING. IF IF I MAY FOLLOW UP ON THAT, WHAT IS YOUR DROP OFF ROUTINE? IS THERE A LENGTH OF TIME PEOPLE ARE DROPPING THEM OFF OR IS IT ALL AT ONCE? IT IT'S VARIES. IT'S LIKE IN STAGES. THERE'S NEVER, YOU KNOW, A LARGE AMOUNT OF PARENTS COMING AT THE SAME TIME. YEAH. BECAUSE OUR ROUTINE IS, YOU KNOW, WE OFFER PICKUP AND DROP OFF. SO WE TAKE KIDS TO SCHOOL FOR PARENTS. SO, YOU KNOW, THEY COME AT INTERVALS. AND THEN WHEN WE COME BACK, IT JUST, IT'S BASED ON WHEN THE PARENT GETS OFF OF WORK AND THEY'RE NOT ALL COMING BACK AT THE SAME TIME. I JUST HAVE TO THINK THAT WITH JUPITER, YOU'VE GOT TRAFFIC CONTROL THERE AT LAWLER, WESTERN JUPITER, I MEAN, TRAFFIC CONTROL. YOU CAN EVEN GO RIGHT DOWN. BOBBY, COME BACK RIGHT TO WALNUT. THERE'S 1,000,001 WAYS TO GET OUT. SO I I'M INCLINED TO AGREE WITH MR. ROBERTS THAT I THINK THAT THAT I JUST DON'T SEE THE TRAFFIC IMPACT. I KNOW THAT THERE'S ENGINEERS SMARTER THAN I AM, BUT WE WOULD WE WOULD HAVE DONE THAT STUDY. BUT WE'VE WE'VE SPENT A HUNDRED GRAND, YOU KNOW, ALREADY ON THE DAYCARE. I THINK IT WAS LIKE 20,000. HOW MUCH WAS IT TO DO? LIKE $20,000 OR I FORGET IT WAS IT WAS AT LEAST A COUPLE GRAND TO DO IT. WE'VE JUST SPENT SO MUCH MONEY ON, YOU KNOW, THE DAYCARE ALREADY. YOU KNOW, THE CP, EVERYTHING WE'RE RECOMMENDING BODY. SO YEAH, WHATEVER, WHATEVER WE RECOMMEND IS GOING TO GO BEFORE COUNCIL. AND YEAH, THEY'RE GOING TO ULTIMATELY DO WHAT COUNCIL DOES. YEAH. SO OUR RECOMMENDATIONS IN $4 WILL BUY YOU A CUP OF COFFEE. YES. AND YOU'LL PROBABLY WILL STILL OWE MONEY, BUT ALRIGHTY, COMMISSIONER JENKINS AND I CLEARED THE MOTIONS. WE ARE. NOT TO NITPICK. I AGREE WITH STAFF INSOFAR AS THAT OUR. WE WOULD WANT EVERYTHING TO BE ON THE UP AND UP, COHESIVE, COPACETIC THROUGH AND THROUGH. I MEAN, THERE'S I WOULD HATE FOR THERE TO BE AN INCONSISTENCY IN OUR RECOMMENDATION THAT'S NOT GROUNDED IN STATE OR LOCAL LAW.AND IF THE ORDINANCE IS REQUIRED, TIA FOR THIS JUST FOR CIRCULATION, EVEN THOUGH THEY'VE BEEN OPERATING, OPERATING NOT AS A DAYCARE, THEY WERE OPERATING AS A CHARTER SCHOOL. AND WE DISCOVERED THE DISCREPANCY, WHICH HAS LED US TO THE PROCE AND TO DO ALL THE REST. I MEAN, THAT'S FROM THE STATE LEVEL. YEAH. YOU ARE LICENSED AS A DAYCARE, BUT NOT LOCALLY. I WANT THEM TO BE, YOU KNOW, BOARD. I DON'T I HEAR THAT THE APPLICANT SAYING THAT THERE IS A COST ASSOCIATED WITH DOING AN ADDITIONAL TIA THAT THEY ARE NOT PREPARED AT THIS POINT TO, TO HANDLE. AND BECAUSE OF THAT, I WOULD BE MORE INCLINED TO RECOMMEND THE EIGHT YEAR TO GIVE THEM THAT TIME. AND THEN AT A LATER TIME, THEY CAN COME THROUGH WITH THE TIA AND DO WHATEVER ADDITIONAL EXPANSION THEY WANT. OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE IN BETWEEN THE TIME THAT THIS RECOMMENDATION HAPPENS AND THE TIME THEY GET TO CITY COUNCIL, THEY COULD COME UP WITH ANOTHER TIA. I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S A HUGE COST, BUT IF YOU WANT THE ADDITIONAL CAPACITY, IT SOUNDS LIKE THE. THEY WOULD, YOU KNOW, REQUEST IT. SO THAT'S, THAT'S WHERE I AM ON IT. I'M AGAIN, I'M STILL FOR THE APPLICATION, BUT I DO THINK IF IF IF STAFF IS SAYING IT'S A HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUE RELATING TO, LET'S SAY, AN EMERGENCY SITUATION COMES AND ALL THOSE FAMILIES ARE RUSHING TO GET THEIR KIDS.
AND I'M LIKE, GOD FORBID ANYTHING LIKE THAT HAPPEN. I WOULD JUST WANT STAFF TO BE COMFORTABLE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT BASED ON, YOU KNOW, WHAT THEY'VE GOT. SO THAT'S WHERE I AM ON THAT. I THINK WE WERE JUST CONFUSED BECAUSE IT'S IT'S BEEN OPERATING WITH 180 KIDS FOR TEN YEARS. LIKE WE WERE CONFUSED, WHY DO WE HAVE TO DO THIS NOW WHEN THEY'VE NEVER HAD TO DO IT? BUT I GUESS BECAUSE IT WAS, YOUNOW, LICENSED AS A CHARTER SCHOOL INSTEAD OF A DAYCARE THE WHOLE TIME WE WE WERE JUST CONFUSED WHY WE HAVE TO DO IT NOW. BUT LIKE I SAID, WE'RE OKAY WITH DOING WHATEVER YOU GUYS SUGGEST. BUT YEAH. WELL, YOU DID MANAGE TO GET IN ONE OF THE BUSINESSES THAT'S VERY REGULATED AND PAPERWORK INTENSIVE. YEAH. AND COMMISSIONER ABEL. OKAY, I'M GOING TO TRY AND WADE MYSELF THROUGH THIS. I AM GOING TO AGREE WITH MR. JENKINS THAT WE APPROVE FOR AN EIGHT YEAR PERIOD TO GIVE YOU TIME WITH 100 KIDS TO PROVE. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. RESTRIPING OF THE PARKING LOT, AND IMPROVEMENTS
[00:55:02]
TO THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE ISLAND, WITH THE POSSIBILITY OF SOMETHING THERE AT BOBBY LANE ON THE CORNER. SOMETHING PRETTIER. BUT I THINK THAT YOU'RE DOING THE RIGHT THING, AND I THINK THAT YOU REALLY HAVE A GOOD VISION AND THAT'S WHAT WE WANT. SO THAT'S MY MOTION. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ABEL AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER JENKINS.I WANT TO CLARIFY. SO YOU SAID SOMETHING ABOUT SOMETHING PRETTY ON BOBBY. HOW DO WE LIKE I DON'T KNOW, I, I, I DON'T KNOW, I, I SOME ENHANCEMENTS, SOME ENHANCEMENTS WHAT, WHAT KIND OR LANDSCAPE? OKAY. LANDSCAPE CANOPY TREE. OKAY. BENCH A BENCH. YEAH. SOMETHING TO IMPROVE THE CORNER. OKAY. ON BOBBY LANE ON BOBBY. OKAY. IF I, IF I, BEFORE WE I SUMMARIZE IT CAN I ASK I'M GOING TO ASK YOU ONE QUESTION IN YOUR PAPERWORK WITH THE STATE. HAVE THEY ASKED FOR ZONING DOCUMENTS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? NO. OKAY. HAS YOUR BANK ASKED FOR ZONING DOCUMENTS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? OKAY. I DIDN'T WANT TIED TO A SUP1 FOR 100 TO GO GET BACK TO THE STATE AND KNOCK THEIR LICENSE BACK DOWN. YEAH, I DON'T I'VE DEALT WITH ENOUGH PAPERWORK THAT THAT IT DOES NOT HAVE TO BE IN THERE, IF THAT'S WHAT WE'RE LIMITING THEM TO ANYWAY. AND I DON'T HAVE TO HAVE THAT IN MY MOTION IF YOU WANT TO CLARIFY, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE LIMITED TO PER THE CIRCULATION. OKAY, I'M FINE WITH DROPPING THAT AND JUST GOING WITH THE CIRCULATION. OKAY. LET ME SUMMARIZE THE MOTION. AS I UNDERSTAND IT NOW, THE MOTION IS TO APPROVE THE SUP FOR A PERIOD OF EIGHT YEARS WITH THE STAFF SUGGESTIONS OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, LANDSCAPING ON THE ISLAND, LANDSCAPING AT THE CORNER AND STRIPING OF THE PARKING LOT. IS THAT OKAY WITH THE SECOND TO DO I OKAY, I USED EIGHT YEAR.
EIGHT YEAR. YEAH. HOPEFULLY THIS WILL GET YOU STARTED. SORRY. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? EVERYBODY UNDERSTAND THE MOTION. COULD SOMEBODY EXPLAIN IT TO ME? NO, I DID IT ONCE ON THE RECORD. PREPARE TO VOTE. THANK YOU GUYS.
AND THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. THAT WAS THE LAST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS CURRENTLY 727. SO UNTIL OUR MEETING OF
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.